DESC:FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a synergistic insecticidal compositions comprising A) meta- diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen; formulation thereof and to a method of controlling undesired insects-pests in economically important crops.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The emergence of insects showing resistance to various insecticides is a serious problem worldwide, and new insecticides with a novel mode of action are always needed in agriculture. During the past decade, insecticides possessing a variety of novel MoAs have been launched, specifically the diamide insecticides, chlorantraniliprole and flubendiamide exhibit high bioactivity levels and excellent control performances against lepidopteran species when compare to existing insecticide emamectin benzoate. However frequent applications of diamide insecticides have resulted in the selection of diamide resistance in field populations of H. armigera, S. exigua, P. xylostella etc. This poses a huge challenge to control these pests owing to the limited number of effective insecticides available.
Thus, there is an urgent need to explore novel MoA insecticides for suppressing diamide- and avermectin-resistant lepidopteran pests, such as H. armigera, S. exigua. A recently developed meta-diamide compound, Broflanilide, which acts on a novel site in the insect c-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABAR) is expected to exhibit high activity against lepidopteran pests, which have developed resistance to diamide and other insecticides. Further Broflanilide also exhibits high activity against various pests coleopteran and thysanopteran besides lepidopteran.
However to minimize the cost of efficient integrated pest management programs, easy availability of insecticides and to delay the pest resistance towards new meta-diamide compound it is necessary to develop the feasible mixing partner of different MoA chemistries.
Therefore, there exists a need in the art to develop an insecticidal compositions, which are stable, synergistic, broad spectrum, environmentally safe and effective in control of a wide spectrum of insect pests in crops. The insecticidal compositions must show a broader scope of activity to avoid or to prevent the development of resistant varieties of strains to the active ingredients or to the mixtures of known active ingredients used by farmer while minimising the doses/cost of chemicals sprayed in the agriculture fields.
As a solution to the above mentioned problems, the inventors of the present invention surprisingly found that compositions comprising A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen, provides effective control of a wide spectrum of insect-pests.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides a compositions comprising A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In one aspect, the compositions of the present invention comprises A) meta-diamide compound in the range of 2-40% w/w; insecticide B) which is selected from Abamectin in the range of 0.5-5% w/w or Emamectin Benzoate in the range of 0.5-25% w/w or Chlorantraniliprole in the range of 10-60% w/w; insecticide C) which is selected from Deltamethrin in the range of 0.5-20% w/w or Diafenthiuron in the range of 10-70% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in the range of 5-25% w/w or Spiromesifen in the range of 10-50% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In one other aspect, the compositions of the present invention comprises A) meta-diamide compound in the range of 3-20% w/w; insecticide B) which is selected from Abamectin in the range of 0.8-4.8% w/w or Emamectin Benzoate in the range of 1-8% w/w or Chlorantraniliprole in the range of 6-12% w/w; insecticide C) which is selected from Deltamethrin in the range of 6.4-13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron in the range of 50-60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in the range of 14-20% w/w or Spiromesifen in the range of 12-48% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In another aspect, the compositions of the present invention is selected from a group comprising:
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 0.8 to 4.8% w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipient;
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 8 % w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w, and Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 6 to 12 % w/w and Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a process of preparation of the compositions comprising A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an aspect, the compositions of the present invention are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) or any other formulation suitable for combinations.
In another aspect, the compositions of the present invention comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable excipient selected from the group comprising of dispersing agent(s), wetting agent(s), dispersing cum wetting agent(s), disintegrating agent(s), defoaming agent(s) / defoamer(s) / antifoaming agent(s) / antifoamer(s), biocide(s)/preservative(s), viscosity modifier(s)/ rheology modifier(s)/ thickener(s), anti-freeze agent(s), pH modifier(s), stabilizer(s), solvent(s), filler(s), diluent(s) or a combination thereof and other excipients as will be required in a particular type of formulation.
In another aspect, the compositions of the present invention comprises;
the dispersing agent, is selected from the group comprising ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer, graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, blend of acrylic graft copolymer and emulsifier, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate, anionic tristyrylphenol phosphate surfactant, non-ionic surfactant, polyalkoxylated butyl ether dispersant, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate condensate, sodium lignosulphonate, sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, sodium polycarboxylate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric dispersant, modified styrene acrylic polymeric aqueous dispersant, proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulphate formaldehyde condensate, lignosulfonic acid dispersant, kraft lignosulfonate with a low degree sulfonation, modified sodium lignosulphonate, naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid and phenol, alkyl naphthalene sulfonate sodium salt, modified naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonated kraft lignin, naphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 0.1-20% w/w;
the wetting agent, is selected from the group comprising branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend, polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend with a anionic blend, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, sulphonated anionic wetter, copolymer condensate of ethylene and propylene oxide, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, comb-type polymeric surfactant, polyalkylene oxide block copolymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate, dibutyl naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, dialkyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 0.1-10% w/w;
the dispersing cum wetting agent, is selected from the group comprising Jeemox SCR, Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer, sodium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, ammonium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid condensation, proprietary blend of anionic surfactant, proprietary blend of polymeric surfactant, sodium methyl oleoyl taurate, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate ester or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 2-10% w/w;
the disintegrating agent, is selected from ammonium sulphate, lactose or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 5-25% w/w;
the anti-freeze agent, is selected from the group comprising glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 1 to 10% w/w;
the antifoamer/defoamer, is selected from the group comprising polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 0.01 to 2% w/w;
the biocide/preservative, is selected from the group comprising 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1,2- benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, isothiazolinone or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 0.01 to 1% w/w;
the thickener, is selected from the group comprising xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 0.1-5% w/w;
the filler, is selected from the group comprising, silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth or a combination thereof and present in an amount quantity sufficient; and
the diluent is demineralised water and present in an amount quantity sufficient.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The definitions provided herein for the terminologies used in the present disclosure are for illustrative purpose only and in no manner limit the scope of the present invention disclosed in the present disclosure.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although other methods and materials similar, or equivalent, to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention, the preferred materials and methods are described herein.
It is to be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the terms "comprises", "comprising", "includes", "including", “has”, “having”, “contains”, “containing”, “characterized by” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, subject to any limitation explicitly indicated. For example, a composition, mixture, process or a method that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, mixture, process or method.
The transitional phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step or ingredient not specified. If in the claim, such would close the claim to the inclusion of materials other than those recited except for impurities ordinarily associated therewith. When the phrase “consisting of” appears in a clause of the body of a claim, rather than immediately following the preamble, it limits only the element set forth in that clause; other elements are not excluded from the claim as a whole.
As used herein, the terms “composition” or “compositions” or "formulation" or "formulations" can be used interchangeably, unless stated otherwise, is meant to encompass, and are not limited to, compositions or formulations containing the combination of A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen.
As used herein, the term “agriculturally acceptable excipient (s)” refers to inert substances and are auxiliary substances added to the processing or use of pesticide preparations and used to improve the physical and chemical properties of formulations. The auxiliaries themselves are essentially free of biological activity, but can affect the control effect.
The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w/w” or “%” means the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solute on or composition unless otherwise specified.
The term “active ingredient” (a.i.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the composition responsible for control of insects-pests in crops of useful plants.
As used herein, the term "effective amount" means the amount of the active substances in the compositions to achieve an observable effect on death, retardation, prevention, and removal, destruction, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of the target pests. An effective amount of the compositions will also vary according to the prevailing conditions such as desired insecticidal effect and duration, weather, target pests and species, target crops, locus, mode of application, and the like.
As used herein, the term “insecticide”, refers to any chemical substance used to destroy/kill, inhibit or otherwise adversely affect the insect pests.
As used herein, “Meta-diamide compound” is Broflanilide and encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form(s). Broflanilide belongs to the IRAC Group 30 (GABR) with a novel mode of action and demonstrating excellent efficacy in the control of many problematic chewing insect pests (Leps), including caterpillars and beetles in specialty and row crops, and non-crop pests such as termites, ants, cockroaches and flies. It has potential use applications in cereals as a seed treatment for control of wireworms, as well as for foliar use in leafy and fruiting vegetables, potato, soybean, cotton, corn and legumes.
As used herein, the term “Abamectin” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Abamectin. Abamectin is known for its insecticide, acaricide (miticide) and a nematicide activities. It acts by stimulating the release of gamma aminobutyric acid, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, thus finally activating chloride channels. It is used for control of motile stage of mites, leaf miners, suckers, beetles etc. on ornamentals, cotton, citrus fruit, pome fruit, nut crops, vegetables, potatoes and other crops.
As used herein, the term “Emamectin Benzoate” belongs to the class of avermectin insecticides and is produced by bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis and is effective against many insect pests. It acts by stimulating the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, thus finally activating chloride channels. It is a non-systemic insecticide which penetrates leaf tissues by translaminar movement.
As used herein, the term “Chlorantraniliprole” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Chlorantraniliprole. Chlorantraniliprole belongs to the class of diamide insecticide. It acts by activation of ryanodine receptors, leading to loss of internal calcium stores. It is used for control of wide range of chewing pests primarily Lepidopteran, Coleopteran, Dipetran and Isopteran in a broad range of crops including fruit, vegetables, vines, cotton, sugarcane, rice and grass.
As used herein, the term “Deltamethrin” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Deltamethrin. Deltamethrin belongs to pyrethroid group of insecticides. It is a non-systemic insecticide with contact and stomach action. It prevents the sodium channels from functioning, so that no transmission of nerve impulses can take place. It is potent insecticide effective by contact and ingestion against a wide range of pests in cereals, citrus, cotton, grapes, maize, oilseed rape, soybeans, top fruits and vegetables.
As used herein, the term “Diafenthiuron” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), polymorph(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Diafenthiuron. Diafenthiuron belongs to the class of thiourea insecticide/acaricide. Diafenthiuron is a potent in vivo inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration. It is an insecticide/acaricide which kills larvae, nymphs and adults by contact and/or stomach action and also shows some ovicidal action. It is effective against phytophagous mites and other sucking pests in cotton, various field and fruit crops, ornamental plants and vegetables.
As used herein, the term “Pyriproxyfen” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Pyriproxyfen. Pyriproxyfen belongs to the class of juvenile hormone mimic. It acts as an insect juvenile hormone analogue that inhibits insect maturation processes.
As used herein, the term “Spiromesifen” encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), polymorph(s), derivative(s) or any other modified form of Spiromesifen. Spiromesifen belongs to the class of tetronic acid. It is a lipid biosynthesis inhibitor and non-systemic. It is effective against whiteflies and against Tetranychus spp., Polyphagotarsonemus spp., and Paratrioza spp., in cotton, maize, potatoes, vegetables and ornamentals.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a compositions comprising A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the compositions of the present invention comprises A) meta-diamide compound in the range of 2-40% w/w; insecticide B) which is selected from Abamectin in the range of 0.5-5% w/w or Emamectin Benzoate in the range of 0.5-25% w/w or Chlorantraniliprole in the range of 10-60% w/w; insecticide C) which is selected from Deltamethrin in the range of 0.5-20% w/w or Diafenthiuron in the range of 10-70% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in the range of 5-25% w/w or Spiromesifen in the range of 10-50% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the compositions of the present invention comprises A) meta-diamide compound in the range of 3-20% w/w; insecticide B) which is selected from Abamectin in the range of 0.8-4.8% w/w or Emamectin Benzoate in the range of 1-8% w/w or Chlorantraniliprole in the range of 6-12% w/w; insecticide C) which is selected from Deltamethrin in the range of 6.4-13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron in the range of 50-60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in the range of 14-20% w/w or Spiromesifen in the range of 12-48% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the compositions of the present invention is selected from a group comprising:
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 0.8 to 4.8% w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipient;
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 8 % w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
meta-diamide compound is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w, and Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 6 to 12 % w/w and Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients.
In another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) or any other formulation suitable for combinations.
In one other embodiment, the compositions of the present invention comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable excipient selected from the group comprising of dispersing agent(s), wetting agent(s), dispersing cum wetting agent(s), disintegrating agent(s), defoaming agent(s) / defoamer(s) / antifoaming agent(s) / antifoamer(s), biocide(s)/preservative(s), viscosity modifier(s)/ rheology modifier(s)/ thickener(s), anti-freeze agent(s), pH modifier(s), stabilizer(s), solvent(s), filler(s), diluent(s) or a combination thereof and other excipients as will be required in a particular type of formulation.
The compositions of present invention uses dispersing agents to prevent agglomeration of solid particles and keep them suspended in fluid. Non-limiting examples of dispersing agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine salt, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer, graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, blend of acrylic graft copolymer and emulsifier, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate, anionic tristyrylphenol phosphate surfactant, non-ionic surfactant, polyalkoxylated butyl ether dispersant, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate condensate, sodium lignosulphonate, sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, sodium polycarboxylate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric dispersant, modified styrene acrylic polymeric aqueous dispersant, proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulphate formaldehyde condensate, lignosulfonic acid dispersant, kraft lignosulfonate with a low degree sulfonation, modified sodium lignosulphonate, naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid and phenol, alkyl naphthalene sulfonate sodium salt, modified naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonated kraft lignin, naphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate. One or more dispersing agents may be used in the compositions of the present invention. The dispersing agent is present in the range from 0.1-20% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses wetting agent to facilitate the process of dispersion of the granules in the liquid. Non-limiting examples of wetting agents that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend, polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend with a anionic blend, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, sulphonated anionic wetter, copolymer condensate of ethylene and propylene oxide, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, comb-type polymeric surfactant, polyalkylene oxide block copolymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate, dibutyl naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, dialkyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate. One or more wetting agents may be used in the compositions of the present invention. The wetting agents is present in the range from 0.1-10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention also uses dispersing cum wetting agent. Non-limiting examples of dispersing cum wetting agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to, Jeemox SCR, Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer, sodium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, ammonium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid condensation, proprietary blend of anionic surfactant, proprietary blend of polymeric surfactant, sodium methyl oleoyl taurate, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate ester. One or more dispersing cum wetting agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Dispersing cum wetting agent is present in the range from 2-10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention also uses disintegrating agent that can swell or disintegrate the composition. Non-limiting examples of disintegrating agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to, ammonium sulphate, lactose. One or more disintegrating agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Disintegrating agent is present in the range from 5-25% w/w.
The composition of present invention also uses defoaming agent. The term “defoaming agent(s)” or “defoamer(s)” or “antifoaming agent(s)” “antifoamer(s)” refers to a chemical additive that reduces and hinders the formation of foam in liquid, semi-solid, or solid formulations. The terms defoaming agent and anti-foaming agent can be used interchangeably. Suitable defoamer used herein, but not limited to, polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion, organic fluorine compounds. One or more defoaming agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Defoaming agent is present in the range from 0.01 to 2% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses biocide/preservatives to prevent the composition from spoilage due to bacteria, yeasts and fungi or deterioration due to undesirable chemical changes. Suitable biocide/preservative used herein, but not limited to 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1,2- benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, potassium sorbate, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid esters, 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one or a combination thereof and present in the range from 0.01-1% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses thickener which are usually polymeric material, and at a low concentration increases the viscosity of an aqueous solution and helps to stabilize the composition. Suitable thickener used herein, but not limited to xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon or a combination thereof and present in the range from 0.1-5% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses anti-freeze agent which are used to prevent deleterious effects due to freezing and lyophilization (lyophilisation). Suitable anti-freeze agent used herein, but not limited to glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol or a combination thereof and present in the range from 1 to 10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses filler. Suitable fillers that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include, but not limited to, silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth. The filler may be used in an amount of quantity sufficient to make 100%w/w formulation.
The compositions of present invention uses diluents. Suitable diluents that may be used in the composition of the present invention is demineralised water and present in an amount quantity sufficient to make 100%w/w formulation.
The compositions of the present invention is found to be effective to control wide spectrum of insect pests from the orders of Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Acarina, Thysanoptera, particularly the compositions of present invention gave excellent control on shoots and fruits borer, jassids, aphid, whitefly, mites, thrips and leaf miner. Further the composition of the present invention may be used to control variety of insect pests in cereals, paddy/rice, pulses, oilseeds, fibre crops, vegetables, fruit crops, plantations and spice crops, particularly the compositions of present invention tested on vegetables viz., Tomatoes and Chilli crops and gave significantly better results compared to solo and binary compositions.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process of preparation of the compositions comprising A) meta-diamide compound B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a SC formulations which comprises: a) diluting and solubilizing a biocide, defoamer and antifreeze agent in demineralised water in a mixing vessel and adding dispersing and wetting agent under stirring to get homogeneous mixture; b) adding active ingredients one by one under stirring and mixing till homogeneous slurry obtained; c)wet grinding at suitable temperature till desired particle size obtained, and d) adding previously prepared viscosity modifier solution and stirring to obtain SC formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a WDG formulations which comprises: a) preparing homogenous mixture of all ingredients; b) milling and grinding till desired particle size; c) preparing dough; d) extruding the granules and drying to obtain the water dispersible granules formulation.

The compositions of the present invention can be applied by any one of the methods selected from atomization, spreading, dusting, spraying, diffusion, immersion, irrigation (chemigation), mixing, foaming, dressing, coating, blasting, fumigation, smoking, smog and painting.

The rate of application amount of the prepared compositions varies depending on, for example, the blending ratio of active ingredients, meteorological condition, dosage form, application time, application method, application place, insects to be controlled, and a target crop, in ordinary cases.
The inventors of the present invention have surprisingly found that the compositions of the present invention showed enhanced control over existing compositions. Moreover the composition of the present invention is more effective than their individual counterparts. This allows a substantial reduction in the application rates of each of these active ingredients, while maintaining good efficacy. The decrease in application rates reduces treatment cost to the farmer and also eases the burden on the environment both from manufacturing waste and crop protection chemical residues.
The insecticidal compositions of present invention provides a wide spectrum control of insect-pests, delays the emergence of the resistant strains, minimizes the risk of development of resistance and achieves effective and economical control of undesired insect-pest.
The insecticidal compositions of present invention provides a wide spectrum control of insect-pests and minimizes the risk of development of resistance ultimately, which reflects the delays in emergence of the resistant strains hence provide effective and economical control of undesired insect-pest.
The insecticidal compositions of the present invention provides a number of other advantages:
Significant increased efficacy in comparison to the other formulations tested during the trials.
Is synergistic hence denies the need of sequential application of solo insecticides to control different pest spectra thereby reducing the environmental load of insecticides.
Uses lesser amounts of active ingredients hence considerable reduction in cost, which would benefit farmers.
The compositions provided one shot solution to farmers to control broad spectrum of pests.
Is storage stable.
Is completely safer to crops (non-phytotoxic).
Reduction in environmental load of insecticidal residues.
Reduction in quantity of water required for spray of the product in agriculture fields.
Reduction in generation of empty containers of product, thereby, reducing concerns of their disposal.
Provides a broad range of product choice for effective pest management.

Thus, from the foregoing description, it will be apparent to one of the person skilled in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the description. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the foregoing description be limited to the description set forth above, but rather that such description be construed as encompassing such features that reside in the present invention, including all the features and embodiments that would be treated as equivalents thereof by those skilled in the relevant art.
The embodiments of the present invention are more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrations only, since numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those of skill in the art. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight basis and all reagents used in the examples were obtained or are available from the chemical suppliers.
EXAMPLES
The insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprising A) meta-diamide compound, B) at least one insecticide selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole and C) at least one more insecticide selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen, Spiromesifen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s) in the form of suspension concentrate (SC) and water dispersible granule (WDG) is provided in table 1-29. The unit of each component of the compositions are expressed in “% w/w” i.e. the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solution or composition. All the compositions are prepared by following the processes as disclosed in description. All the prepared compositions of the present invention has been tested for stability/shelf life at accelerated temperature.

Table 1: Examples 1 to 3: Composition of Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 1 Eg: 2 Eg: 3
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 17.6 20 14.4
2 Abamectin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 3.2 4.0 4.8
3 Deltamethrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 9.6 13.6 6.4
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0 7.0
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt Dispersing Agent 0.5 0.5 0.5
6 Branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter Wetting Agent 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
7 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend Wetting Agent 2 1.0 1.5 1.0
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.2 0.2 0.2
11 D. M. Water Diluent 59.3 51.6 62.1
Total 100 100 100

Table 2: Quantities of ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 17.6% + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 17.77
2 Abamectin Tech. (Purity 97%) 3.29
3 Deltamethrin Tech. (Purity 97%) 9.89
4 Propylene glycol 5
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt 0.5
6 Branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter 3
7 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend 1
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum 0.2
11 D. M. Water 58.75
Total 100

Table 3: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 17.6% + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 17.6% (±10%) 17.21% 16.9%
Abamectin Content % w/w Min. 3.2% (±10%) 3.24% 3.16%
Deltamethrin Content % w/w Min. 9.6% (±10%) 9.69% 9.55%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 93.6% 89.7%
Abamectin Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.17% 98.72%
Deltamethrin Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 95.26% 91.73%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve

99.94% 99.90%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 7.1 7.1
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. NIL NIL

Table 4: Examples 4 to 5: Composition of Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 4 Eg: 5
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 3.6
2 Abamectin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.8 1.2
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 50 55
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer Dispersing Agent 1.5 1.5
6 Polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer Wetting Agent 2.5 2.5
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.6 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.15 0.15
10 D. M. Water Diluent 34.35 30.35
Total 100 100

Table 5: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 5% + Abamectin 0.8% + Diafenthiuron 50% (SC)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 5.05
2 Abamectin Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.84
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (Purity 97%) 51.54
4 Propylene glycol 5.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer 1.5
6 Polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer

2.5
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum 0.15
10 D. M. Water 32.72
Total 100

Table 6: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 5% + Abamectin 0.8% + Diafenthiuron 50% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 5.00% (±10%) 5.23% 5.22%
Abamectin Content % w/w Min. 0.8% (±15%) 0.8% 0.75%
Diafenthiuron Content % w/w Min. 50.00% (±2.5%) 49.96% 49.58%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 94.7% 94.1%
Abamectin Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 99.1% 98.3%
Diafenthiuron Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 96.92% 97.53%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.94% 99.95%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 4.99% 5.23%
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 7: Examples 6 to 8: Composition of Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron (WDG)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 6 Eg: 7 Eg: 8
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 4.4 3.6
2 Abamectin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.8 1.0 1.2
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 50 60 55
4 Modified sodium lignosulphonate Dispersing agent 1 4.0 5.0 4.0
5 highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer dispersant Dispersing agent 2 4.0 5.0 4.0
6 Sodium Isopropyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 2.0 3.0 2.0
7 Ammonium sulphate Disintegrating agent 10 10 10
8 China Clay filler 24.2 11.6 20.2
Total 100 100 100

Table 8: Examples 9 to 11: Composition of Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 9 Eg: 10 Eg: 11
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 18 10 8.8
2 Abamectin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 2.4 1.6 2.0
3 Spiromesifen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 12 2 38
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 7.0 7.0 7.0
5 Graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol Dispersing Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter Wetting Agent 1.0 1.0 1.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.2 0.3 0.2
10 D. M. Water Diluent 55.8 74.5 39.4
Total 100 100 100

Table 9: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 18% + Abamectin 2.4% + Spiromesifen 12% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 18.18
2 Abamectin Tech. (Purity 97%) 2.47
3 Spiromesifen Tech. (Purity 98%) 12.24
4 Propylene glycol 7.0
5 Graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol 3.0
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter 1.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum 0.2
10 D. M. Water 55.31
Total 100

Table 10: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 18% + Abamectin 2.4% + Spiromesifen 12% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 18.0% (±10%) 18.11% 18.05%
Abamectin Content % w/w Min. 2.4% (±15%) 2.45% 2.46%
Spiromesifen Content % w/w Min. 12.0% (±10%) 12.52% 12.45%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 90.3% 86.1%
Abamectin Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 96.1% 96.00%
Spiromesifen Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 92.44% 87.00%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.95% 99.91%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 6.45 5.86
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 11: Examples 12 to 14: Composition of Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen (WDG)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 12 Eg: 13 Eg: 14
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 18 10 8.8
2 Abamectin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 2.4 1.6 2
3 Spiromesifen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 12 2.0 38
4 Sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate Dispersing agent 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend Wetting agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer dispersant Dispersing agent 2 1.0 1.0 1.0
7 Ammonium sulphate Disintegrating agent 10 20 10
8 China clay Filler 48.6 57.4 32.2
Total 100 100 100

Table 12: Examples 15 to 17: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Deltamethrin (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 15 Eg: 16 Eg: 17
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 12 20 16
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.0 8.0 8.0
3 Deltamethrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 6.4 13.6 9.6
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) Dispersing cum wetting Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend Wetting Agent 2.0 2.0 2.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.6 0.6 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.2 0.2 0.2
10 D. M. Water Diluent 66.7 47.5 55.5
Total 100 100 100

Table 13: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 12% + Emamectin Benzoate 4% + Deltamethrin 6.4% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 12.24
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (Purity 97%) 4.21
3 Deltamethrin Tech. (Purity 97%) 6.70
4 Propylene glycol 5.0
5 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) 3.0
6 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend 2.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum 0.2
10 D. M. Water 62.44
Total 100

Table 14: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 12% + Emamectin Benzoate 4% + Deltamethrin 6.4% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 12.00% (±10%) 12.30% 12.20%
Emamectin Benzoate Content % w/w Min. 4.00% (±10%) 4.16% 4.15%
Deltamethrin Content % w/w Min. 6.4% (±10%) 6.67% 6.62%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 88.00% 82.3%
Emamectin Benzoate Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 85.6% 80.2%
Deltamethrin Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 87.31 81.42
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.94 99.95
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 4.49 4.33
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 15: Examples 18 to 19: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Diafenthiuron (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 18 Eg: 19
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 3.0
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.0
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 50 55
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer Dispersing Agent 1.5 1.5
6 Polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer Wetting Agent 2.5 2.5
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.6 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.15 0.1
10 D. M. Water Diluent 33.75 31.2
Total 100 100

Table 16: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 5% + Emamectin Benzoate 1.4% + Diafenthiuron 50% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 5.05
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.47
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (Purity 97%) 51.54
4 Propylene glycol 5.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer 1.5
6 Polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer 2.5
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.6
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum 0.15
10 D. M. Water 32.09
Total 100

Table 17: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 5% + Emamectin Benzoate 1.4% + Diafenthiuron 50% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 5.00% (±10%) 5.1% 5.14%
Emamectin Benzoate Content % w/w Min. 1.4% (±15%) 1.39% 1.4%
Diafenthiuron Content % w/w Min. 50.00% (±2.5%) 50.3% 49.33%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.00% 91.6%
Emamectin Benzoate Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 93.8% 87.9%
Diafenthiuron Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.27% 91.74%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.94% 99.93
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 6.1 6.2
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 18: Examples 20 to 22: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Diafenthiuron (WDG)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 20 Eg: 21 Eg: 22
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 4.0 3.0
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.8 1.0
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 50 60 55
4 Modified sodium lignosulphonate Dispersing agent 1 4.0 5.0 4.0
5 highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer dispersant Dispersing agent 2 4.0 5.0 4.0
6 Sodium Isopropyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 2.0 3.0 2.0
7 Ammonium sulphate Disintegrating agent 10 10 10
8 China Clay filler 23.6 11.2 21
Total 100 100 100

Table 19: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 5% + Emamectin Benzoate 1.4% + Diafenthiuron 50% (WDG)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (99% Basis) 5.05
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (95%% Basis) 1.47
3 Diafenthiuron Tech. (96%% Basis) 52.08
4 Modified sodium lignosulphonate 4.0
5 highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer dispersant 4.0
6 Sodium Isopropyl Naphthalene Sulfonate 2.0
7 Ammonium sulphate 10
8 China Clay 21.4
Total 100

Table 20: Examples 23 to 25: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Pyriproxyfen (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 23 Eg: 24 Eg: 25
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.0 5.0 3.0
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.8 1.4 1
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 20 17 14
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 7.0 7.0 7.0
5 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) Dispersing cum wetting Agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
6 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
8 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.2 0.2 0.2
9 D. M. Water Diluent 62.4 64.8 70.2
Total 100 100 100

Table 21: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 4% + Emamectin Benzoate 1.8% + Pyriproxyfen 20% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 4.04
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.89
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 98%) 20.40
4 Propylene glycol 7.00
5 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) 4.00
6 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
7 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
8 Xanthan Gum 0.2
9 D. M. Water 61.87
Total 100

Table 22: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 4% + Emamectin Benzoate 1.8% + Pyriproxyfen 20% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 4.00% (±10%) 4.19% 4.20%
Emamectin Benzoate Content % w/w Min. 1.8% (±15%) 1.86% 1.84%
Pyriproxyfen Content % w/w Min. 20.00% (±6%) 20.48% 20.50%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 97.30% 84.00
Emamectin Benzoate Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.20% 98.2
Pyriproxyfen Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80.00% 98.94% 89.00
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.96% 99.94%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 3.5 to 6.5 4.11 4.5
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 23: Examples 26 to 28: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Spiromesifen (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 26 Eg: 27 Eg: 28
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 10 8.0 6.0
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 2.8 4.0 2.0
3 Spiromesifen Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 32 40 48
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) Dispersing cum wetting Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend Wetting agent 1.0 1.0 1.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.1 0.1 0.1
10 D. M. Water Diluent 45.5 38.3 34.3
Total 100 100 100

Table 24: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 10% + Emamectin Benzoate 2.8% + Spiromesifen 32% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 10.10
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 2.94
3 Spiromesifen Tech. (Purity 98%) 32.65
4 Propylene glycol 5.00
5 Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.) 3.00
6 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend 1.00
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum 0.10
10 D. M. Water 44.61
Total 100

Table 25: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 10% + Emamectin Benzoate 2.8% + Spiromesifen 32% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 10.00% (±10%) 9.95% 9.91%
Emamectin Benzoate Content % w/w Min. 2.8% (±10%) 2.89% 2.77%
Spiromesifen Content % w/w Min. 32.00% (±5%) 32.44% 30.24%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.70% 96.3%
Emamectin Benzoate Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.00% 98.1%
Spiromesifen Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.76% 95.14%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.94% 99.95%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 3.5 to 6.5 4.4 4.3
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

Table 26: Examples 29 to 31: Composition of Broflanilide + Emamectin Benzoate + Spiromesifen (WDG)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 29 Eg: 30 Eg: 31
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 10 8.0 6.0
2 Emamectin Benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 2.8 4.0 2.0
3 Spiromesifen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 32 40 48
4 Sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate Dispersing agent 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend Wetting agent 2.0 2.0 2.0
6 Modified Lignosulfonate Dispersing agent 2 1.5 1.5 1.5
7 Ammonium sulphate Disintegrating agent 10 10 10
8 China clay Filler 36.7 29.5 25.5
Total 100 100 100

Table 27: Examples 32 to 34: Composition of Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen (SC)
SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 32 Eg: 33 Eg: 34
% w/w
1 Broflanilide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.0 5.0 3.0
2 Chlorantraniliprole Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 9.0 6.0 12
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 20 17 14
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate in polyethylene glycol Dispersing Agent 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate Dispersing Agent 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
7 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend witha an anionic blend Wetting agent 1.0 1.0 1.0
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.18 0.18 0.18
11 D. M. Water Diluent 55.22 60.22 59.22
Total 100 100 100

Table 28: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Broflanilide 4% + Chlorantraniliprole 9% + Pyriproxyfen 20% (SC)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Broflanilide Tech. (Purity 99%) 4.04
2 Chlorantraniliprole Tech. (Purity 95%) 9.47
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 98%) 20.40
4 Propylene glycol 5.0
5 Graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate in polyethylene glycol 3.0
6 Sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate 2.0
7 Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend witha an anionic blend 1.0
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum 0.18
11 D. M. Water 54.31
Total 100

Table 29: Stability studies of the composition of Broflanilide 4% + Chlorantraniliprole 9% + Pyriproxyfen 20% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Broflanilide Content % w/w Min. 4.00% (±10%) 4.17% 4.15%
Chlorantraniliprole Content % w/w Min. 9.00% (±10%) 9.09% 9.13%
Pyriproxyfen Content % w/w Min. 20.00% (±6%) 20.15% 20.66%
Broflanilide Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 97.00% 92.10
Chlorantraniliprole Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.70% 95.94
Pyriproxyfen Suspensibility % w/w Min. 80.00% 98.83% 98.94
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.95% 99.94%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 5.00 to 8.00 6.75 6.35
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. Nil Nil

As evident from the foregoing tables (1-29) that all the desired compositions have been prepared successfully and has been tested for stability/shelf life at accelerated temperature. After 14 days of storage at 54.0 ± 2 °C, there were no significant changes in active ingredient content, suspensibility, wettability, dispersibility, pH and has passes the sieve test. Therefore, it is concluded that compositions of present invention has good stability and shelf life.

BIO-EFFICACY OF THE INSECTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
Experimental trial was conducted to evaluate the insecticidal compositions of the present invention in India against major insects on Tomato and Chilli Crop with ternary compositions of present invention and comparative solo and binary compositions as per the details provided in Table 30-67. The abbreviations used in table 30-69 are as follows:
TN: Treatment Number
g.a.i: gram active ingredients
ha: hectare
DAA: Days after Insecticide application
O=Observed % insect reduction (%) Calculated using Abbott Formula;
E=Expected % insect reduction Calculated using Colby Formula;
CR=Colby ratio
UTC: Untreated control
Experimental design and method for Tomato Crop
The present field experiment was conducted at Pimpalgaon of Nashik district of Maharashtra state during the season Kharif-2022 with ten treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design. The popular and widely cultivated Tomato variety Aryaman selected for this experiments was sown in a plot size of 5m X 5m for each replication with a spacing of 60cm X 45cm in sandy loam soil. The crop was maintained well by adapting standard agronomic practices. The treatments were imposed when thrips, jassids, whitefly population and fruit borer and leaf miner attained economic threshold level. Total two round of sprays were given, 1st at 0 days and 2nd at after 10 days. The observations on counts of sucking pest viz., thrips, jassids and whitefly were recorded on five randomly selected and tagged plants per treatment plot. On each plant, five leaves (two each from bottom and middle and one from top portion of the plant) were observed to note the pest count also the observation on larva of leaf miner was recorded on five randomly selected and tagged plants per treatment plot. First count was taken at a day (0 day) before first spray and post treatment counts were made at 7 and 14 days after application (DAA) whereas crop damage caused by Tomato fruit borer was measured on the basis of damaged fruits. In order to assess the % fruit damage, the damage fruits on five randomly selected and tagged plants were counted as against total available fruits on the observed plants. Fruit damage was recorded after first and second application. The applications were carried out by using the hand operated aspire Knapsack sprayer pump fitted with hollow cone nozzle. The required quantity of water volume was used @ 500 litre per hectare. The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula: Reference: Abbott, W.S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol.; 18 : 265-267.
n in T after treatment
Corrected % Insect Reduction= 1- --------------------------- X 100
n in Co after treatment
Where, n = no. of insects; T = Treated; Co = Control
The % fruit damage by Tomato fruit borer was calculated by using following formula:
No. of damaged fruits
Percent fruit damage = –––––––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
Total number of fruits

Experimental design and method for Chilli Crop
The present field experiment was conducted at Baptala of Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh state during the season Kharif-2022 with ten treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design. The popular and widely cultivated Guntur Chilli variety S-4 selected for this experiments was sown in a plot size of 5m X 5m for each replication with a spacing of 60cm X 45cm in sandy loam soil. The crop was maintained well by adapting standard agronomic practices. The treatments were imposed when thrips, jassids, whitefly and mites population and fruit borer attained economic threshold level. Total two round of sprays were given, 1st at 0 days and 2nd at after 10 days. The observations on counts of sucking pest viz., thrips, jassid, whitefly and mites were recorded on five randomly selected and tagged plants per treatment plot. On each plant, five leaves (two each from bottom and middle and one from top portion of the plant) were observed to note the pest count. First count was taken at a day (0 day) before first spray and post treatment counts were made at 7 and 14 days after application (DAA) whereas crop damage caused by Chilli fruit borer was measured on the basis of damaged fruits. In order to assess the % fruit damage, the damage fruits on five randomly selected and tagged plants were counted as against total available fruits on the observed plants. Fruit damage was recorded after first and second application. The applications were carried out by using the hand operated aspire Knapsack sprayer pump fitted with hollow cone nozzle. The required quantity of water volume was used @ 500 litre per hectare. The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula as given above. The % fruit damage was calculated using the formula as given above.
Evaluation of synergistic effect
A synergistic effect exists whenever the action of an active ingredient combination is greater than the sum of the actions of the individual components. Synergism was calculated by using Colby’s method, Weeds, vol. 15 No. 1(Jan 1967), pp. 20-2.
The synergistic action expected for a given combination of three active components can be calculated as follows:
?(E=(X+Y+Z) - ((XY+YZ+XZ))/100 +) ?( XYZ/10000)
Where:
E represents expected percentage of control for the combination of the three active ingredients at defined doses (for example equal to x, y and z respectively),
X is the percentage of control observed by the compound (I) at a defined dose (equal to x),
Y is the percentage of control observed by the compound (II) at a defined dose (equal to y),
Z is the percentage of control observed by the compound (III) at a defined dose (equal to z).
If observed control of the combination > Expected control, the combination is synergistic (Colby ratio > 1)
If observed control of the combination < Expected control, the combination is antagonistic (Colby ratio < 1)
If observed control of the combination = Expected control, the combination is additive (Colby ratio =1)

Phytotoxicity Observations: Insecticidal combinations of the present invention were found completely safe (non-phytotoxic) on tested crops.

Table 30: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin on Chilli Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Abamectin 4% + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+4+13.6 250 95 67.62 1.40 94 69.69 1.35
T2 Broflanilide 17.6 % + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 17.6+3.2+9.6 250 93 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 14.4 % + Abamectin 4.8% + Deltamethrin 6.4% SC 14.4+4.8+6.4 250 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 49 49.4 0.99 51 51.12 1.00
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 61 64.8 0.94 60 67.76 0.89
T6 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 7+15 375+150 40 41.12 0.97 41 41.72 0.98
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 45 - - 48 - -
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 8 - - 6 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 36 - - 38 - -
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 13.0 16.0

Table 31: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin on Chilli Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Abamectin 4% + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+4+13.6 250 94 70.86 1.33 92 70.67 1.30
T2 Broflanilide 17.6 % + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 17.6+3.2+9.6 250 93.0 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 14.4 % + Abamectin 4.8% + Deltamethrin 6.4% SC 14.4+4.8+6.4 250 95.0 ,, ,, 93.3 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 53 54.88 0.97 51 51.12 1.00
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 70 70.24 1.00 64 68.8 0.93
T6 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 7+15 375+150 41 41.72 0.98 42 43.6 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 48 - -
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 6 - - 6 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 38 - - 40 - -
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 12.0 16.0

Table 32: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin on Chilli Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Abamectin 4% + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+4+13.6 250 90 44.8 2.01 89 40.75 2.18
T2 Broflanilide 17.6 % + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 17.6+3.2+9.6 250 91.8 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 14.4 % + Abamectin 4.8% + Deltamethrin 6.4% SC 14.4+4.8+6.4 250 90 ,, ,, 88 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 31 31 1.00 26 26.85 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 40 40 1.00 36 37.63 0.96
T6 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 7+15 375+150 23 26.4 0.87 22 23.05 0.95
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 25 - - 23 - -
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 8 - - 5 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 20 - - 19 - -
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 14.0 18.0

Table 33: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin on Chilli Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Abamectin 4% + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+4+13.6 250 91.8 66.71 1.38 90 62.52 1.44
T2 Broflanilide 17.6 % + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 17.6+3.2+9.6 250 90.0 ,, ,, 88 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 14.4 % + Abamectin 4.8% + Deltamethrin 6.4% SC 14.4+4.8+6.4 250 89.0 ,, ,, 88 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 46 46.31 0.99 42 42.34 0.99
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 60 63.42 0.95 55 59.7 0.92
T6 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 7+15 375+150 43 43.58 0.99 39 39.55 0.99
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 41 - - 38 - -
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 9 - - 7 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 38 - - 35 - -
T10 UTC (mean of jassid at 5 leaves/plant) 15.00 19

Table 34: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Deltamethrin on Chilli Crop against Mites.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Mites
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Abamectin 4% + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+4+13.6 250 95 55.07 1.73 93 47.66 1.95
T2 Broflanilide 17.6 % + Abamectin 3.2% + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 17.6+3.2+9.6 250 93.1 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 14.4 % + Abamectin 4.8% + Deltamethrin 6.4% SC 14.4+4.8+6.4 250 94.2 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 42 42.4 0.99 37 37.69 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 28 29.8 0.94 20 21.88 0.91
T6 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 7+15 375+150 49 50.08 0.98 41 43.72 0.94
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 10 - - 7 - -
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 36 - - 33 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 22 - - 16 - -
T10 UTC (mean of mites at 5 leaves/plant) 13.0 16.0

Table 35: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+4+250 500 94 59.38 1.58 92 55.35 1.66
T2 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 18+6+275 500 91.2 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+4+250 500 94 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4.4 % + Abamectin 1 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 22+5+300 500 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 18+6+275 500 93 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 55 56.32 0.98 52 53 0.98
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 53 55.36 0.96 50 52.5 0.95
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 7+300 375+600 12 15.37 0.78 9 10.7 0.84
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 52 - - 50 - -
T10 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 9 - - 6 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 7 - - 5 - -
T12 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 13.0 15.0

Table 36: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+4+250 500 95 69.92 1.36 93 66.05 1.41
T2 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 18+6+275 500 92.0 ,, ,, 91.3 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+4+250 500 91.0 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4.4 % + Abamectin 1 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 22+5+300 500 93.2 ,, ,, 91.8 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 18+6+275 500 91 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 52 53 0.98 49 50.08 0.98
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 67 68 0.99 61 64.64 0.94
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 7+300 375+600 38 39.84 0.95 32 34.72 0.92
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 48 - -
T10 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 6 - - 4 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 36 - - 32 - -
T12 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 16.0 18.0

Table 37: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+4+250 500 91.6 54.14 1.69 90 48.22 1.87
T2 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 18+6+275 500 92.9 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+4+250 500 94 ,, ,, 92.4 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4.4 % + Abamectin 1 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 22+5+300 500 95 ,, ,, 93.2 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 18+6+275 500 92 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 20 23.56 0.85 14 19.09 0.73
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 49 49.6 0.99 43 44.32 0.97
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 7+300 375+600 45 45.4 0.99 39 40.48 0.96
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 16 - - 13 - -
T10 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 9 - - 7 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 40 - - 36 - -
T12 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 15.00 17

Table 38: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+4+250 500 94 74.8 1.26 92.4 70.74 1.31
T2 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 18+6+275 500 92.0 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+4+250 500 94.0 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4.4 % + Abamectin 1 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 22+5+300 500 91.0 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 18+6+275 500 93.3 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 54 55 0.98 50 51.24 0.98
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 68 72 0.94 66 68.2 0.97
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 7+300 375+600 49 49.6 0.99 44 44.8 0.98
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 47 - -
T10 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 10 - - 8 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 44 - - 40 - -
T12 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 17

Table 39: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Mites.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Mites
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+4+250 500 94 67.26 1.40 92 64.26 1.43
T2 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 18+6+275 500 93 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Abamectin 0.8 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+4+250 500 91 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4.4 % + Abamectin 1 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 22+5+300 500 94 ,, ,, 93 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3.6 % + Abamectin 1.2 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 18+6+275 500 92.4 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 48 48.85 0.98 44 45.85 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 38 40.48 0.94 37 37.3 0.99
T8 Abamectin 1.90 % EC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 7+300 375+600 60 64.8 0.93 59 62.38 0.95
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 7 - - 5 - -
T10 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 45 - - 43 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 36 - - 34 - -
T12 UTC (mean of mites at 5 leaves/plant) 12.00 14.00

Table 40: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 25+4+100 250 95 58.49 1.62 93 54.88 1.69
T2 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % SC 22+5+95 250 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % SC 45+6+30 250 92 ,, ,, 90.6 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 25+4+100 250 91.4 ,, ,, 90.8 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % WDG 22+5+95 250 93.2 ,, ,, 91.7 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % WDG 45+6+30 250 93 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 54 55.84 0.97 52 53 0.98
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 54 54.88 0.98 50 52 0.96
T9 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 7+96 375+400 10 13.52 0.74 7 9.76 0.72
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 52 - - 50 - -
T11 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 8 - - 6 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 6 - - 4 - -
T13 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 15.0 18.0

Table 41: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 25+4+100 250 94 57.7 1.63 92.1 53.57 1.72
T2 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % SC 22+5+95 250 93.0 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % SC 45+6+30 250 92.5 ,, ,, 91.4 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 25+4+100 250 91.9 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % WDG 22+5+95 250 92.6 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % WDG 45+6+30 250 91 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 52 53 0.98 49 50.08 0.98
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 53 55 0.96 50 51.64 0.97
T9 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 7+96 375+400 14 15.4 0.91 10 10.72 0.93
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 48 - -
T11 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 6 - - 4 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 10 - - 7 - -
T13 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 13.0 16.0

Table 42: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 25+4+100 250 90.8 53.83 1.69 90.2 49.51 1.82
T2 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % SC 22+5+95 250 94 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % SC 45+6+30 250 95.2 ,, ,, 94 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 25+4+100 250 92.4 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % WDG 22+5+95 250 91.8 ,, ,, 90.5 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % WDG 45+6+30 250 92.2 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 17 21.74 0.78 14 17.23 0.81
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 48 49.26 0.97 44 45.71 0.96
T9 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 7+96 375+400 46 46.31 0.99 42 43.27 0.97
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 14 - - 11 - -
T11 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 9 - - 7 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 41 - - 39 - -
T13 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 12.00 15

Table 43: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 25+4+100 250 94 59.38 1.58 93 55.83 1.67
T2 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % SC 22+5+95 250 91.0 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % SC 45+6+30 250 93.2 ,, ,, 91.8 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 25+4+100 250 93.9 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % WDG 22+5+95 250 91.8 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % WDG 45+6+30 250 92 ,, ,, 91.3 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 55 56.32 0.98 52 53.5 0.97
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 55 55.36 0.99 50 52.5 0.95
T9 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 7+96 375+400 12 15.37 0.78 10 11.65 0.86
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 52 - - 50 - -
T11 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 9 - - 7 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 7 - - 5 - -
T13 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 15.00 18

Table 44: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Abamectin + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Mites.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Mites
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 25+4+100 250 95 71.33 1.33 93.2 66.07 1.41
T2 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % SC 22+5+95 250 93.1 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % SC 45+6+30 250 94.4 ,, ,, 92.6 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Abamectin 1.6 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 25+4+100 250 92.6 ,, ,, 91.3 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8.8 % + Abamectin 2 % + Spiromesifen 38 % WDG 22+5+95 250 91.5 ,, ,, 90.3 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 18 % + Abamectin 2.4 % + Spiromesifen 12 % WDG 45+6+30 250 92.4 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Abamectin 1.90 % EC 25+7 125+375 50 51.4 0.97 46 46.99 0.98
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 45 46.9 0.96 40 40.48 0.99
T9 Abamectin 1.90 % EC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 7+96 375+400 66 68.14 0.97 61 63.52 0.96
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 10 - - 7 - -
T11 Abamectin 1.90 % EC 7 375 46 - - 43 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 41 - - 36 - -
T13 UTC (mean of mites at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 17.00

Table 45: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Deltamethrin on Tomato Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+8+13.6 100 92 83.07 1.11 90 78.16 1.15
T2 Broflanilide 16 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 16+8+9.6 100 95.2 ,, ,, 94 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide12 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Deltamethrin 6.4 % SC 12+4+6.4 100 93.4 ,, ,, 92.3 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 72 73.54 0.98 66 68.8 0.96
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 68 68.64 0.99 62 63.6 0.97
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 10+15 200+150 55 65.44 0.84 51 58 0.88
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 51 - - 48 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 46 - - 40 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 36 - - 30 - -
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 16.00

Table 46: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Deltamethrin on Tomato Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+8+13.6 100 95.2 71.67 1.33 93 67.02 1.39
T2 Broflanilide 16 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 16+8+9.6 100 94.0 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 12 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Deltamethrin 6.4 % SC 12+4+6.4 100 93.0 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC+Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 61 61.72 0.99 55 56.6 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC+Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 56 57.08 0.98 50 52.88 0.95
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG+Deltamethrin 11 % EC 10+15 200+150 50 51.16 0.98 45 46.8 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 42 - - 38 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 34 - - 30 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 26 - - 24 - -
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 15

Table 47: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Deltamethrin on Tomato Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+8+13.6 100 92.8 46.72 1.99 90.8 42.67 2.13
T2 Broflanilide 16 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 16+8+9.6 100 94 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 12 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Deltamethrin 6.4 % SC 12+4+6.4 100 92.3 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 28 28 1.00 24 24.56 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 40 40.8 0.98 36 37.68 0.96
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 10+15 200+150 32 33.4 0.96 29 30.08 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 20 - - 18 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 10 - - 8 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 26 - - 24 - -
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 17.00 19

Table 48: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Deltamethrin on Tomato Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+8+13.6 100 94.1 59.28 1.59 92.1 55.28 1.67
T2 Broflanilide 16 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 16+8+9.6 100 93 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 12 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Deltamethrin 6.4 % SC 12+4+6.4 100 92.8 ,, ,, 91.3 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC+Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 47 47.8 0.98 43 44.2 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC+Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 51 53.2 0.96 49 50.4 0.97
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG+Deltamethrin 11 % EC 10+15 200+150 31 32.14 0.96 25 28 0.89
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 40 - - 38 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 13 - - 10 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 22 - - 20 - -
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 10.00 13

Table 49: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Deltamethrin on Tomato Crop against Leaf miner.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Leaf miner
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 20 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 13.6 % SC 20+8+13.6 100 93.4 75.29 1.24 92.2 70.21 1.31
T2 Broflanilide 16 % + Emamectin benzoate 8 % + Deltamethrin 9.6 % SC 16+8+9.6 100 92.4 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 12 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Deltamethrin 6.4 % SC 12+4+6.4 100 95 ,, ,, 93.4 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 65 65.68 0.99 60 60.8 0.99
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 25+15 125+150 61 62.56 0.98 56 57.44 0.97
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Deltamethrin 11 % EC 10+15 200+150 50 52.48 0.95 45 46.8 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 48 - - 44 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 34 - - 30 - -
T9 Deltamethrin 11 % EC 15 150 28 - - 24 - -
T10 UTC (mean of larva per plant) 12.00 16.00

Table 50: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+7+250 500 92 75.66 1.22 90.2 71.24 1.27
T2 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.0 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 15+5+275 500 93.2 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+7+250 500 92.8 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 20+9+300 500 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 15+5+275 500 93 ,, ,, 91.6 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 71 73.54 0.97 68 69.4 0.98
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 52 54.92 0.95 50 52.06 0.96
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 10+300 200+600 49 50.32 0.97 40 43.6 0.92
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 51 - - 49 - -
T10 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 46 - - 40 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 8 - - 6 - -
T12 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 11.00 15.00

Table 51: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+7+250 500 95 82.08 1.16 93.2 79.49 1.17
T2 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 15+5+275 500 92 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+7+250 500 92.8 ,, ,, 91.8 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 20+9+300 500 93.0 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 15+5+275 500 91 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC+Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 70 72 0.97 67 69.84 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 67 68 0.99 62 64.64 0.96
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG+Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 10+300 200+600 55 64.16 0.86 52 60.56 0.86
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 48 - -
T10 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 44 - - 42 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 36 - - 32 - -
T12 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 12.00 15

Table 52: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+7+250 500 92 56.8 1.62 90.4 51.72 1.75
T2 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 15+5+275 500 93.3 ,, ,, 91.4 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+7+250 500 91.9 ,, ,, 90.1 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 20+9+300 500 94.8 ,, ,, 92.9 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 15+5+275 500 92 ,, ,, 90.5 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 26 28 0.93 20 24.56 0.81
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 50 52 0.96 46 47.52 0.97
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 10+300 200+600 45 46 0.98 40 41.12 0.97
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 20 - - 18 - -
T10 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 10 - - 8 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 40 - - 36 - -
T12 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 17

Table 53: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+7+250 500 92 80.56 1.14 91 76.3 1.19
T2 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 15+5+275 500 95 ,, ,, 93.4 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+7+250 500 91.8 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 20+9+300 500 94.0 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 15+5+275 500 92.2 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 61 62.62 0.97 56 57.68 0.97
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 68 78.16 0.87 65 74.24 0.88
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 10+300 200+600 50 53.72 0.93 47 48.48 0.97
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 58 - - 54 - -
T10 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 11 - - 8 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 48 - - 44 - -
T12 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 16

Table 54: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Diafenthiuron on Chilli Crop against Mites.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Mites
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % SC 25+7+250 500 94 45.84 2.05 92 41.06 2.24
T2 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % SC 15+5+275 500 94.6 ,, ,, 92.3 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Diafenthiuron 50 % WDG 25+7+250 500 91.9 ,, ,, 90.8 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 60 % WDG 20+9+300 500 92.6 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Diafenthiuron 55 % WDG 15+5+275 500 92 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 14 15.37 0.91 9 10.7 0.84
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 25+300 125+600 40 40.48 0.99 35 37.3 0.94
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 10+300 200+600 39 41.76 0.93 37 37.96 0.97
T9 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 7 - - 5 - -
T10 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 9 - - 6 - -
T11 Diafenthiuron 50 % WP 300 600 36 - - 34 - -
T12 UTC (mean of mites at 5 leaves/plant) 16.00 20.00

Table 55: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % SC 25+7+80 250 91.1 75.39 1.21 90.4 70.36 1.28
T2 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 20+10+100 250 92 ,, ,, 90.8 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % SC 15+5+120 250 92.9 ,, ,, 91.4 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % WDG 25+7+80 250 91 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 20+10+100 250 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % WDG 15+5+120 250 90.8 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 72 73.54 0.98 67 68.8 0.97
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 52 54.43 0.96 50 50.6 0.99
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 10+96 200+400 48 49.78 0.96 40 43 0.93
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 51 - - 48 - -
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 46 - - 40 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 7 - - 5 - -
T13 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 16.00

Table 56: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % SC 25+7+80 250 95.2 73.96 1.29 93 71.35 1.30
T2 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 20+10+100 250 92.2 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % SC 15+5+120 250 91 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide e 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % WDG 25+7+80 250 92.8 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 20+10+100 250 94.0 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % WDG 15+5+120 250 91 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 70 72 0.97 68 69.84 0.97
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 51 53.5 0.95 49 50.6 0.97
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 10+96 200+400 45 47.92 0.94 42 44.9 0.94
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 50 - - 48 - -
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 44 - - 42 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 7 - - 5 - -
T13 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 17

Table 57: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % SC 25+7+80 250 92.2 56.8 1.62 90 51.72 1.74
T2 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 20+10+100 250 93.8 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % SC 15+5+120 250 91.2 ,, ,, 90.6 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % WDG 25+7+80 250 92 ,, ,, 90.9 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 20+10+100 250 94 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % WDG 15+5+120 250 91 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 27 28 0.96 24 24.56 0.98
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 51 52 0.98 45 47.52 0.95
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 10+96 200+400 45 46 0.98 40 41.12 0.97
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 20 - - 18 - -
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 10 - - 8 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 40 - - 36 - -
T13 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 17

Table 58: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % SC 25+7+80 250 95 67.25 1.41 94 60.22 1.56
T2 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % +Spiromesifen 40 % SC 20+10+100 250 94.4 ,, ,, 93 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % SC 15+5+120 250 91.4 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % WDG 25+7+80 250 91.9 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 20+10+100 250 93.4 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % WDG 15+5+120 250 92 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC+Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 63 64.4 0.98 56 57.68 0.97
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC+Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 62 63.2 0.98 56 56.76 0.99
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG+Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 10+96 200+400 17 18.12 0.94 12 13.52 0.89
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 60 - - 54 - -
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 11 - - 8 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 8 - - 6 - -
T13 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 11.00 14

Table 59: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Spiromesifen on Chilli Crop against Mites.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Mites
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % SC 25+7+80 250 93 50.32 1.85 92 43.46 2.12
T2 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % SC 20+10+100 250 92.6 ,, ,, 91.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % SC 15+5+120 250 91.8 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 10 % + Emamectin benzoate 2.8 % + Spiromesifen 32 % WDG 25+7+80 250 92.4 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T5 Broflanilide 8 % + Emamectin benzoate 4 % + Spiromesifen 40 % WDG 20+10+100 250 94.1 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T6 Broflanilide 6 % + Emamectin benzoate 2 % + Spiromesifen 48 % WDG 15+5+120 250 92 ,, ,, 90.4 ,, ,,
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 16 17.2 0.93 11 11.65 0.94
T8 Broflanilide 20% SC + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 25+96 125+400 43 44.8 0.96 38 39.2 0.97
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 10+96 200+400 44 46 0.96 38 40.48 0.94
T10 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 8 - - 5 - -
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 10 - - 7 - -
T12 Spiromesifen 22.90 % SC 96 400 40 - - 36 - -
T13 UTC (mean of mites at 5 leaves/plant) 12.00 15.00

Table 60: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+7+85 500 91.2 75.13 1.21 90.4 70.05 1.29
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+9+100 500 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+5+70 500 92 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 72 73.54 0.98 67 68.8 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 52 53.94 0.96 49 50.08 0.98
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 10+50 200+500 48 49.24 0.97 41 42.4 0.97
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 51 - - 48 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 46 - - 40 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 6 - - 4 - -
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 11.00 15.00

Table 61: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+7+85 500 95.2 68.08 1.40 93 62.1 1.50
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+9+100 500 91.6 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+5+70 500 94.0 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 65 65.68 0.99 59 60.1 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 58 59.08 0.98 50 52.5 0.95
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 10+50 200+500 26 27.46 0.95 23 24.19 0.95
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 56 - - 50 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 22 - - 20.2 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 7 - - 5 - -
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 16

Table 62: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+7+85 500 92.2 66.52 1.39 90 59.96 1.50
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+9+100 500 94 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+5+70 500 91 ,, ,, 90.2 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 43 44.2 0.97 36 37.44 0.96
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 61 62.8 0.97 55 56.48 0.97
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 10+50 200+500 45 46 0.98 39 41.12 0.95
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 38 - - 32 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 10 - - 8 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 40 - - 36 - -
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 17

Table 63: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+7+85 500 95.1 74.66 1.27 94.1 67.84 1.39
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+9+100 500 93.4 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+5+70 500 92 ,, ,, 90.3 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 70 71.2 0.98 64 65.04 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 63 64.8 0.97 56 57.68 0.97
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 10+50 200+500 35 36.64 0.96 29 30.08 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 60 - - 54 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 28 - - 24 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 12 - - 8 - -
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 12.00 16

Table 64: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Leaf miner.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Leaf miner
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.4 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+7+85 500 93 66.51 1.40 92 61.7 1.49
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Emamectin benzoate 1.8 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+9+100 500 95 ,, ,, 93.6 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Emamectin benzoate 1 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+5+70 500 93.6 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 25+10 125+200 63 63.6 0.99 59 59.68 0.99
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 51 52.16 0.98 46 46.8 0.98
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 10+50 200+500 35 35.6 0.98 30 31.6 0.95
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 48 - - 44 - -
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5 % SG 10 200 30 - - 28 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 8 - - 5 - -
T10 UTC (mean of larva per plant) 15.00 17.00

Table 65: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against fruit borer.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Chlorantraniliprole 6 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+30+85 500 91 74.6 1.22 90.6 69.42 1.31
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Chlorantraniliprole 9 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+45+100 500 94.6 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Chlorantraniliprole 12 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+60+70 500 90 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 25+30 125+150 72 73.54 0.98 67 68.8 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 51 52.96 0.96 48 49.04 0.98
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 30+50 150+500 47 48.16 0.98 40 41.2 0.97
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 51 - - 48 - -
T8 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 150 46 - - 40 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 4 - - 2 - -
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 14.00

Table 66: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Thrips.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Chlorantraniliprole 6 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+30+85 500 95 68.57 1.39 94 61.7 1.52
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Chlorantraniliprole 9 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+45+100 500 94.2 ,, ,, 92 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Chlorantraniliprole 12 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+60+70 500 92.0 ,, ,, 91 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 25+30 125+150 66 66.56 0.99 58 60.1 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 58 58.64 0.99 50 52 0.96
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 30+50 150+500 27 28.56 0.95 22 23.39 0.94
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 56 - - 50 - -
T8 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 150 24 - - 20.2 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 6 - - 4 - -
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 17

Table 67: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Whitefly.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Chlorantraniliprole 6 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+30+85 500 92.6 72.72 1.27 90.2 66.95 1.35
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Chlorantraniliprole 9 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+45+100 500 94.2 ,, ,, 92.8 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Chlorantraniliprole 12 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+60+70 500 92 ,, ,, 90 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 25+30 125+150 44 45.44 0.97 38 38.8 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 68 69 0.99 62 63.28 0.98
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 30+50 150+500 55 56 0.98 50 51.4 0.97
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 38 - - 32 - -
T8 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 150 12 - - 10 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 50 - - 46 - -
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 13.00 15

Table 68: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Jassids.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Chlorantraniliprole 6 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+30+85 500 95.4 72.78 1.31 94.8 66.07 1.43
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Chlorantraniliprole 9 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+45+100 500 93 ,, ,, 91.5 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Chlorantraniliprole 12 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+60+70 500 92.2 ,, ,, 91.1 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 25+30 125+150 68 69.76 0.97 62 63.52 0.98
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 61 62.2 0.98 54 55.36 0.98
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 30+50 150+500 34 35.2 0.97 28 29.32 0.95
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 58 - - 52 - -
T8 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 150 28 - - 24 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 10 - - 7 - -
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 14.00 16

Table 69: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Broflanilide + Chlorantraniliprole + Pyriproxyfen on Tomato Crop against Leaf miner.
TN Treatments Dose Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Leaf miner
O E CR O E CR
T1 Broflanilide 5 % + Chlorantraniliprole 6 % + Pyriproxyfen 17 % SC 25+30+85 500 92.2 68.08 1.35 91.6 62.76 1.46
T2 Broflanilide 4 % + Chlorantraniliprole 9 % + Pyriproxyfen 20 % SC 20+45+100 500 93 ,, ,, 92.2 ,, ,,
T3 Broflanilide 3 % + Chlorantraniliprole 12 % + Pyriproxyfen 14 % SC 15+60+70 500 94.1 ,, ,, 93 ,, ,,
T4 Broflanilide 20% SC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 25+30 125+150 64 65.68 0.97 59 60.8 0.97
T5 Broflanilide 20% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 25+50 125+500 50 51.64 0.97 45 46.8 0.96
T6 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC + Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 30+50 150+500 37 38.62 0.96 32 33.5 0.96
T7 Broflanilide 20% SC 25 125 48 - - 44 - -
T8 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 150 34 - - 30 - -
T9 Pyriproxyfen 10 % EC 50 500 7 - - 5 - -
T10 UTC (mean of larva per plant) 12.00 16.00

It is evident from the above tables 30-69 that the ternary insecticidal compositions of the present invention gave excellent control on crops against tested insects wherein all the prepared ternary compositions found synergistic as compared to the reference products (solo or binary compositions). It has also been found that use of ternary compositions of present invention not only gave better efficiency by using low a.i., content compared to binary and solo composition but also broaden the spectrum of compositions as the solo and binary compositions are not providing sufficient insect control in given duration.

From Table 30-44 it is clear that abamectin solo is ineffective to control fruit borer, thrips, whitefly and jassids but shown good to moderate effect on mites only, whereas broflanilide solo have medium effect on all the tested pests except mites and whitefly where it is completely ineffective. It is also very clear from table 30-34 that deltamethrin solo has minor effectiveness on tested insects-pest, but the combination of broflanilide and abamectin and deltamethrin shows the significantly excellent efficacy on all the tested insects-pests hence proved to be broad spectrum. It is also clear from table 35-39 that diafenthiuron solo has some efficacy on whitefly and jassids and minor effect on thrips and mites but it is completely ineffective on fruit borer however in combination of diafenthiuron with broflanilide and abamectin broadens the activity spectrum and efficacy has increased manifolds. Similar pattern is reflected in table 40-44, wherein spiromesifen is ineffective on all the tested insects-pests except whitefly but its combination with broflanilide and abamectin turns to be broad spectrum and able to control all the tested insects-pests effectively. Besides the broad spectrum activity all the ternary combinations of table 30-44 found synergistic.

From Table 45-64 it is clear that emamectin benzoate solo has good effect on fruit borer and minor effectiveness on thrips and leaf minor but no effect on whitefly, jassids and mites; whereas broflanilide solo has good to moderate effect on fruit borer, thrips, jassids and leaf minor but has no considerable effect on whitefly and mites. From table 45-49 it is seen that deltamethrin solo has minor effect on all tested insects-pests, whereas the combination of broflanilide with emamectin benzoate and deltamethrin proves to be synergistic and turns to be excellent combination for controlling all the tested insects-pests. It can also be seen from table 50-54, except whitefly and jassids diafenthiuron solo is not promising on fruit borer, thrips and mites but when it combine with broflanilide and emamectin benzoate, effectiveness of prepared combination has increased manifold and controlling of all the tested insects-pests becomes possible in single shot. Similar pattern is observed in table 55-59 wherein, in comparison to spiromesifen and emamectin benzoate solo their combination with broflanilide turns to be synergistic. In table 60-64 solo pyriproxyfen has no effect on tested insect-pest except whitefly, but the ternary combination of broflanilide and emamectin benzoate and pyriproxyfen gives excellent control on all the tested insects-pests.

In quest of diamide insecticide effectiveness on the tested insects-pests, in table 65-69, solo chlorantraniliprole, alongwith solo pyriproxyfen and solo broflanilide is tested, it is clear that solo chlorantraniliprole has no promising effect on thrips, whitefly, jassids, leaf minor except fruit borer, similarly except whitefly pyriproxyfen has no effect at all on fruit borer, thrips, jassids and leaf minor, however ternary combination of broflanilide and chlorantraniliprole and pyriproxyfen proves to be excellent and able to control all the tested insects-pests effectively.

From the foregoing it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitations with respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
,CLAIMS:We Claim:
1. A synergistic insecticidal compositions comprising:
a) A meta-diamide compound;
b) at least one compound selected from Abamectin, Emamectin Benzoate, Chlorantraniliprole;
c) at least one compound selected from Deltamethrin, Diafenthiuron, Pyriproxyfen Spiromesifen; and
d) agriculturally acceptable excipients.

2. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein meta-diamide compound is Broflanilide.

3. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein,
a) Broflanilide is present in the range from 2 to 40 % w/w;
b) Abamectin is present in the range from 0.5 to 5 % w/w or Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 0.5 to 25 % w/w or Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 10 to 60 % w/w;
c) Deltamethrin is present in the range from 0.5 to 20% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 10 to 70% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 5 to 25% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 10 to 50% w/w.

4. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein,
a) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 20 % w/w;
b) Abamectin is present in the range from 0.8 to 4.8 % w/w or Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 8 % w/w or Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 6 to 12 % w/w;
c) Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w.

5. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein the composition is one of:
a) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 0.8 to 4.8% w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
b) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 8 % w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w or Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w or Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
c) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 20% w/w, and Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 6 to 12 % w/w and Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients.

6. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein the compositions is one of:
a) Broflanilide is present in the range from 14.4 to 20% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 3.2 to 4.8% w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
b) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3.6 to 5% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 0.8 to 1.2% w/w and Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
c) Broflanilide is present in the range from 8.8 to 18% w/w and Abamectin is present in the range from 1.6 to 2.4% w/w and Spiromesifen is present in the range from 12 to 40% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
d) Broflanilide is present in the range from 12 to 20% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 4 to 8% w/w and Deltamethrin is present in the range from 6.4 to 13.6% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
e) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 5% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 1.8% w/w and Diafenthiuron is present in the range from 50 to 60% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
f) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 5% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 1 to 1.8% w/w and Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
g) Broflanilide is present in the range from 6 to 10% w/w and Emamectin Benzoate is present in the range from 2 to 4% w/w and Spiromesifen is present in the range from 32 to 48% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients;
h) Broflanilide is present in the range from 3 to 5% w/w and Chlorantraniliprole is present in the range from 6 to 12% w/w and Pyriproxyfen is present in the range from 14 to 20% w/w and agriculturally acceptable excipients.

7. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein the compositions are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) preferably SC and WDG.

8. The synergistic insecticidal compositions, as claimed in claim 1, wherein the agriculturally acceptable excipient is selected from the group comprising dispersing agent, wetting agent, dispersing cum wetting agent, disintegrating agent, anti-freezing agent, defoamer, biocide, thickener, diluent or filler.

9. The synergistic insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 8, wherein,
a) the dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer, graft copolymer of polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, blend of acrylic graft copolymer and emulsifier, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate, anionic tristyrylphenol phosphate surfactant, non-ionic surfactant, polyalkoxylated butyl ether dispersant, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate condensate, sodium lignosulphonate, sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, sodium polycarboxylate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric dispersant, modified styrene acrylic polymeric aqueous dispersant, proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulphate formaldehyde condensate, lignosulfonic acid dispersant, kraft lignosulfonate with a low degree sulfonation, modified sodium lignosulphonate, naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid and phenol, alkyl naphthalene sulfonate sodium salt, modified naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonated kraft lignin, naphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 20% w/w;
b) the wetting agent is selected from the group comprising branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend, polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend, Sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend with a anionic blend, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, sulphonated anionic wetter, copolymer condensate of ethylene and propylene oxide, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, comb-type polymeric surfactant, polyalkylene oxide block copolymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate, dibutyl naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, dialkyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate or a combination thereof, and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 10% w/w;
c) the dispersing cum wetting agent is selected from the group comprising Jeemox SCR, Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer, sodium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, ammonium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid condensation, proprietary blend of anionic surfactant, proprietary blend of polymeric surfactant, sodium methyl oleoyl taurate, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate ester or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 2 to 10% w/w;
d) the disintegrating agent is selected from ammonium sulphate, lactose or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 5-25% w/w;
e) the anti-freezing agent is selected from the group comprising glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol or a combinations thereof, and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 10% w/w;
f) the defoamer is selected from the group comprising polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.01 to 2% w/w;
g) the biocide is selected from the group comprising 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, isothiazolinone or a combinations thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.01 to 1% w/w;
h) the thickener is selected from the group comprising xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 0.50% w/w;
i) the filler is selected from the group comprising, silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth or a combination thereof and present in an amount quantity sufficient; and
j) the diluents is demineralized water and present in an amount quantity sufficient.