DESC:TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of electronic testing systems and, more particularly relates to an automatic testing and tracking of electronic devices using a central server.
BACKGROUND
[0002] This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of art that may be related to various aspects of the present disclosure, which are described below. This disclosure is believed to be helpful in providing the reader with background information to facilitate a better understanding of the various aspects of the present disclosure. Accordingly, it should be understood that these statements are to be read in this light, and not just as admissions of prior art.
[0003] Traditionally, testing electronic devices involves the use of a range of specialized equipment such as multimeters, oscilloscopes, and other meters. These tools are used to measure various aspects of the device’s performance, such as voltage, current, and resistance. The test rig with a load connected to it is used to simulate real-world conditions and ensure that the device can handle the stresses it may encounter in use.
[0004] Conducting these tests requires the presence of a skilled engineer who is knowledgeable about the product and the testing process, and who can operate the equipment. This can be a time-consuming process, taking at least 45 minutes or more depending on the complexity of the device and the number of tests being performed.
[0005] The testing process for electronic devices can be cumbersome because it requires a different setup for each different type of product. This means that the testing process must be customized for each specific device, which can be time-consuming and inefficient. For example, if a manufacturer produces a range of different electronic devices, each with its own unique features and specifications, they will need to set up a separate testing process for each individual device. This can be a challenge because it requires the manufacturer to have a deep understanding of the unique characteristics of each device and to be able to design a testing process that is tailored to those characteristics.
[0006] In addition to the time and effort required to customize the testing process for each different device, there is currently no automation for testing the finished product. This means that the entire process must be carried out manually, which can be labour-intensive and error-prone. Manual testing requires skilled operators who are knowledgeable about the testing process and the specific characteristics of the device being tested. This can be a challenge, especially during peak demand periods when demand for the product is high and skilled labour may be in short supply.
[0007] Overall, the lack of automation in the testing process and the need for a different testing setup for each different type of product can make the testing process cumbersome and inefficient. There is a need for a more streamlined and efficient testing process that can be applied to a wide range of electronic devices.
[0008] The manual testing process also requires a skilled operator with in-depth knowledge of the testing process, especially during peak demand periods when demand for the product is high. This can be a challenge for manufacturers who may not have the necessary skilled workforce available at all times.
[0009] Given these challenges, there is a need for a universal, automated testing system that can test a wide range of electronic devices and track warranty periods more efficiently. Such a system would be able to streamline the testing process and reduce the time and resources required to test electronic devices, while also providing a more accurate and reliable assessment of the device’s performance.
SUMMARY
[00010] The present disclosure relates to an automatic testing and tracking system.
[00011] The present disclosure provides a universal automated testing method and apparatus which can test a wide range of electronic devices and can determine the working status of the devices.
[00012] The method for testing and tracking of one or more devices comprising collecting values of one or more parameters from the one or more devices. The method further comprises comparing the collected values with predefined values of the parameters of the one or more devices, and updating the status of the one or more devices based on the comparison of the collected values with predefined values of the parameters.
[00013] Optionally, updating the status of the one or more devices comprises updating the status of the one or more devices to indicate the devices are working properly when the collected values match the predefined values, and updating the status of the one or more devices to indicate the devices have failed when the collected values do not match the predefined values.
[00014] Optionally, the method comprises assigning a serial number to the one or more devices for future tracking.
[00015] Optionally, the method comprises tracking the real time warranty of the one or more devices.
[00016] Optionally, the method comprises updating the software of the one or more devices when the devices are not updated with the latest software.
[00017] Optionally, the one or more devices are one of inverter, solar devices, and battery.
[00018] Optionally, the one or more parameters are one of temperature, voltage, current, power, charging time, and boost voltage.
[00019] Optionally, the method comprises determining and configuring the predefined parameters, and configuring values of the predefined parameters, wherein the method is performed in a server managing the one or more devices.
[00020] In an another aspect of the presented disclosure an apparatus is disclosed for testing and tracking of one or more devices. The apparatus includes a memory to store processor-executable instructions, and a processor that, upon execution of the instructions, causes the processor to collect values of one or more parameters from the one or more devices, compare the collected values with predefined values of the parameters of the one or more devices, and update the status of the one or more devices based on the comparison of the collected values with predefined values of the parameters.
[00021] The present disclosed apparatus can quickly and accurately identify any issues with the electronic devices, helping to prevent failures and other problems.
[00022] The apparatus can track real-time warranty status of the electronic device being tested. This can be useful for both the manufacturer of the device and the end user, as it helps to ensure that any issues with the device are addressed within the warranty period. Additionally, real-time tracking of the warranty status can help to prevent disputes or misunderstandings regarding the status of the warranty.
[00023] The disclosed method and apparatus can help to ensure that any issues with the electronic device are addressed in a timely and efficient manner.
[00024] The disclosed method and apparatus identifies and tracks the electronic device over its lifetime and can be useful in identifying and addressing the root cause of the failure.
[00025] The disclosed method and apparatus streamlines the testing process and reduces the time & resources required to test electronic devices, while also providing a more accurate and reliable assessment of the device’s performance.
[00026] The above advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent when reference is made to the following description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00027] To further clarify advantages and features of the present disclosure, a more particular description of the disclosure will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof, which is illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The disclosure will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail with the accompanying drawings in which:
[00028] Figure 1a illustrates a schematic diagram of the one or more devices connected to the server according to an embodiment of this application;
[00029] Figure 1b illustrates a main mode operation of the server in an embodiment of this application;
[00030] Figure 2 illustrates a method for testing and tracking of the one or more devices according to an embodiment of this application;
[00031] Figure 3 illustrates a method for testing and tracking of the one or more devices according to an embodiment of this application; and
[00032] Figure 4 is a block diagram of an apparatus to which an embodiment of this application is applicable.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[00033] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory of the disclosure and are not intended to be restrictive thereof.
[00034] Reference throughout this specification to “an embodiment”, “another embodiment”, “an implementation”, “another implementation” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present disclosure. Thus, appearances of the phrase “in an embodiment”, “in another embodiment”, “in one implementation”, “in another implementation”, and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
[00035] The terms “comprises”, “comprising”, or any other variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process or method that comprises a list of steps does not include only those steps but may include other steps not expressly listed or inherent to such process or method. Similarly, one or more devices or sub-systems or elements or structures proceeded by “comprises a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of other devices or other sub-systems or other elements or other structures or additional devices or additional sub-systems or additional elements or additional structures.
[00036] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. The apparatus, system, and examples provided herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
[00037] The terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced items. Further, the term sterile barrier and sterile adapter denotes the same meaning and may be used interchangeably throughout the description.
[00038] The present disclosure pertains to a method and system for the automated testing of electronic devices. The entire system is centrally controlled by a server responsible for managing and coordinating its various functions, as illustrated in Figures 1a-1b.
[00039] In an exemplary embodiment depicted in Figure 1, the server is connected to multiple devices, including the 50KVA device, Bess Faridabad device, Indian Oil Gurugram device, Manhattan device, Ravi Khanna device, Sun Food device, and Whiteland device. These devices are interconnected via Wireless Fidelity (WI-FI), although alternative communication technologies can also be employed. This embodiment showcases the diversity of devices that can be integrated into the system.
[00040] Figure 1b provides insight into the monitoring process conducted by the server on these connected devices. In this exemplary embodiment, the monitoring reveals the MAIN mode operation of the remotely located device. It presents crucial parameters such as RBY input and output voltages, the specific type of battery employed (illustrated using a Lithium battery in this case), output frequency, battery charge status, as well as bypass and grid statuses. This embodiment exemplifies the comprehensive nature of the monitoring system, offering a detailed view of essential device parameters to ensure effective testing and operation.
[00041] To test a specific electronic device using the system described in the present disclosure, the central server is first configured with the predefined or ideal parameters of that device. These parameters are specific to each type of electronic device and may include specifications such as operating voltage, current draw, and temperature range.
[00042] When a device is chosen for testing, these parameters are input into the central server. The central server then collects readings from the device, such as its current voltage, current draw, and temperature. These readings are compared to the predefined or ideal parameters that were input into the central server. If the readings match the predefined or ideal parameters, it can be concluded that the device is functioning properly. If the readings differ from the predefined or ideal parameters, it may indicate that the device has failed or is not functioning properly.
[00043] This process of comparing the readings of the electronic device to the predefined or ideal parameters allows the system to automatically determine the status of the device. By automating this process, the system can quickly and accurately identify any issues with the device, helping to prevent failures and other problems.
[00044] One embodiment of the system described in the present disclosure includes a timer that is installed on the central server. This timer is specifically designed to track the warranty status of the electronic device being tested.
[00045] The timer is configured to align with the warranty period of the device. This means that it is programmed to count the amount of time that has passed since the device was sold or turned on. The timer begins counting as soon as the device is sold or turned on, allowing for real-time tracking of the device’s warranty status.
[00046] This feature is useful for a number of reasons. For one, it allows the system to automatically keep track of the warranty status of the device. This can be useful for both the manufacturer of the device and the end user, as it helps to ensure that any issues with the device are addressed within the warranty period. Additionally, real-time tracking of the warranty status can help to prevent disputes or misunderstandings regarding the status of the warranty.
[00047] Overall, the inclusion of a timer on the central server helps to provide a more comprehensive and efficient solution for tracking the warranty status of electronic devices. By automating this process, the system can help to ensure that any issues with the device are addressed in a timely and efficient manner.
[00048] The central server described in the present disclosure has the capability to store a serial number corresponding to each electronic device that is tested. This serial number is unique to each device and is typically used to identify and track the device over its lifetime.
[00049] By storing the serial number of each device in the central server, it becomes possible to track any faults or past repairs that may have been made to the device. This can be useful for a number of reasons. For example, if a device experiences a failure, the central server can be used to determine whether the device has a history of similar failures or repairs. This information can be useful in identifying and addressing the root cause of the failure.
[00050] In some cases, the serial number may be linked to the country in which the device is sold or used. This can be useful for tracking the location of the device and identifying any regional trends or patterns in terms of failures or repairs. By linking the serial number to the country of use, it becomes easier to identify and track the device, which can be useful for a variety of purposes.
[00051] Overall, the ability of the central server to store and track the serial number of each electronic device provides a useful tool for identifying and addressing any issues that may arise with the device. By storing and tracking this information, the system can help to ensure that devices are properly maintained and operated over their lifetime.
[00052] In addition to the functions described above, the central server described in the present disclosure also has the capability to facilitate the easy updating of software on the electronic devices that are being tested. This can be a useful feature for a number of reasons.
[00053] One of the main benefits of updating software on electronic devices is ensuring the devices are running the latest and most up-to-date version of the software. This can be important for a variety of reasons. For example, newer versions of software may include bug fixes or other improvements that can help to prevent failures or other issues with the device. Additionally, newer versions of software may include new features or capabilities that can enhance the performance or functionality of the device.
[00054] By facilitating the easy updating of software on electronic devices, the central server can help to ensure that the devices are always running the latest and most up-to-date version of the software. This can help to prevent failures and other issues with the device, improving its reliability and overall performance.
[00055] The ability of the central server to facilitate the easy updating of software on electronic devices is an important aspect of the system. By ensuring that the devices are always running the latest and most up-to-date software, the system can help to improve the reliability and performance of the devices over their lifetime.
[00056] Figure 2 shows a method for testing and tracking electronic devices. The method comprises collecting values of one or more parameters from the one or more devices (step 202). A data collection module is used for obtaining values associated with various parameters from a plurality of devices. These parameters encompass a wide range of metrics, including but not limited to performance indicators, temperature, power consumption, and network connectivity. The data collection module employs diverse sensing mechanisms, communication interfaces, or probes to ensure a comprehensive and accurate acquisition of the parameter values.
[00057] The data gathering process is not limited to a specific frequency or method, allowing for flexibility based on the nature of the parameters and the devices involved. The collected data is stored in a centralized repository for subsequent analysis and comparison.
[00058] The method further comprises comparing the collected values with predefined values of the parameters of the one or more devices (step 204). Following the data collection process, a comparison module designed to assess the collected parameter values against predefined thresholds associated with each parameter. These predefined values can be set by system administrators, users, or adaptively adjusted based on historical data patterns. The comparison module employs algorithms and logic to determine the degree of variance between the collected values and the predefined thresholds.
[00059] This step ensures that the system can identify instances where the parameters of the devices deviate from expected or acceptable ranges. The comparison results serve as a basis for further decision-making in the subsequent stage of the process.
[00060] Furthermore, the method comprises updating the status of the one or more devices based on the comparison of the collected values with predefined values of the parameters (step 206). Upon completion of the parameter comparison, the system features a dynamic status update module. This module is responsible for adjusting the operational status of the devices based on the outcomes of the comparison. Devices may be categorized into different states, such as normal, warning, or critical, depending on the severity of the deviations detected.
[00061] The status update module is equipped to trigger automated responses, corrective actions, or notifications in real-time, ensuring a proactive approach to managing the devices. Additionally, the module may include features for logging and reporting the status changes for further analysis or auditing purposes.
[00062] In addition to the testing and tracking functionalities, the method incorporates a robust system for assigning a unique serial number to each device. This serial number serves as a distinctive identifier, facilitating future tracking and management of individual devices. Furthermore, the method integrates a real-time warranty tracking feature, ensuring that the warranty status of each device is continuously monitored. This real-time monitoring enables prompt and effective responses to warranty-related issues, ensuring that maintenance or replacements are carried out within the specified warranty period.
[00063] An additional layer of functionality is introduced through the software update feature. If a device is identified as not running the latest software version, the method triggers an update process. This ensures that devices are consistently equipped with the most recent software enhancements and security patches, contributing to both performance optimization and cybersecurity.
[00064] Crucially, the method is designed to be versatile, accommodating various device types such as inverters, solar devices, and batteries. The parameters used for comparison and testing are configurable, allowing adaptability to different types of electronic devices. The entire process is orchestrated in a server-based environment, emphasizing centralized control and management. The server determines and configures predefined parameters and values, ensuring consistent and efficient execution of the testing, tracking, and management processes across multiple devices.
[00065] Figure 3 describes the further embodiments of the configuration and monitoring process. Step 302: Configuration of Server: The system initiates by configuring a central server with ideal or predefined values and corresponding parameters for one or more devices. This configuration sets the standard for expected device performance. Step 304: Receiving Current Parameter Values: In real-time, the system continuously receives parameter values from the monitored devices. These values represent the instantaneous operational state of the devices.
[00066] Step 306: Comparison with Ideal Values: The received parameter values are systematically compared with the predefined values stored in the server. This step serves to assess whether the devices are operating within the designated parameters. Steps 308a and 308b: Determination of Device Status: 308a: The devices are working properly: If the received values fall within the predetermined range of ideal values, the system determines that the one or more devices are functioning properly. 308b: The devices are not working properly: Conversely, if the received values deviate from the predetermined range, the system concludes that the one or more devices are not working as expected.
[00067] Step 310: Updating Warranty Status and Fault Tracking: Based on the determination of device status: Step 3078a: If the devices are working properly, the system updates the warranty status accordingly. Step 308b: If the devices are not working properly, the system adjusts the warranty status. Additionally, the serial numbers of the devices are stored for efficient fault tracking and recording of previous repairs.
[00068] The automated monitoring process reduces reliance on manual intervention, ensuring continuous and efficient evaluation of device parameters.
[00069] Timely identification of devices not meeting predefined parameters allows for proactive maintenance, minimizing downtime and potential malfunctions. Further, automated and accurate updates to warranty status enhance the overall efficiency of warranty management processes. Additionally, serial number tracking facilitates quick identification of faults and provides a comprehensive history of repairs, aiding in diagnostic analyses.
[00070] The integration of automated device monitoring, evaluation, and warranty management outlined in this invention offers a comprehensive solution for enhancing the reliability and performance of monitored devices. The standardized process ensures efficient operations and maintenance across diverse industries.
[00071] Figure 4 shows an apparatus (400) designed for testing and tracking one or more devices is a system comprised of essential components, namely a memory (402) and a processor (404). The memory serves as a repository for storing instructions that the processor will execute. This interplay of memory and processor functionality forms the core operational framework of the apparatus. In an embodiment, the server is connected to the one or more devices using a controller card (410). Further, for tuning of the one or more devices, a tuning device (420) is connected between the server (400) and the controller card (410).
[00072] In operation, the processor (404) executes the stored instructions to perform a series of actions crucial for testing and tracking the monitored devices. One of the primary functions involves the collection of real-time values of one or more parameters from the devices under scrutiny. This step ensures that the apparatus is constantly informed of the current operational state of the devices.
[00073] Following the parameter value collection, the processor (404) engages in a critical process of comparison. It measures the collected values against predefined parameters also stored within the apparatus. These predefined values serve as a benchmark, representing the anticipated or ideal performance parameters for the devices.
[00074] The apparatus doesn’t merely collect data; it interprets and acts on it. After the comparison, the processor updates the status of the one or more devices. This status update is a reflection of how the devices are performing in relation to the predefined values. If the collected values align with expectations, the devices are deemed to be operating properly. Conversely, deviations from the predefined parameters prompt the system to acknowledge that the devices are not operating as expected.
[00075] The strength of this apparatus lies in its ability to provide real-time insights into the operational status of monitored devices. By automating the process of collecting, comparing, and updating status based on predefined parameters, it offers a streamlined and efficient solution for industries that demand precise and timely monitoring of device performance. In essence, this apparatus becomes an invaluable asset for industries where optimal device functionality is paramount.
[00076] Overall, the aspects of the present disclosure provide a comprehensive solution for automatically testing electronic devices for failures and their warranty status. By automating these processes, the system can help to identify and address issues with electronic devices more efficiently and effectively.
[00077] Benefits, other advantages, and solutions to problems have been described above with regard to specific embodiments. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any component(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential feature or component of any or all the claims.
[00078] While specific language has been used to describe the disclosure, any limitations arising on account of the same are not intended. As would be apparent to a person in the art, various working modifications may be made to the apparatus in order to implement the inventive concept as taught herein. ,CLAIMS:WE CLAIM:
1. A method for testing and tracking of one or more devices, the method comprising:
collecting (202) values of one or more parameters from the one or more devices;
comparing (204) the collected values with predefined values of the parameters of the one or more devices; and
updating (206) the status of the one or more devices based on the comparison of the collected values with predefined values of the parameters.

2. The method as claimed in Claims 1, wherein updating the status of the one or more devices comprises:
updating (308a) the status of the one or more devices to indicate the devices are working properly when the collected values are in the acceptable range of the predefined values; and
updating (308b) the status of the one or more devices to indicate the devices are not working properly when the collected values deviate from the acceptable range of the predefined values.

3. The method as claimed in Claims 1, further comprising assigning (310) a serial number to the one or more devices for future tracking.

4. The method as claimed in Claim 1, further comprising tracking the real time warranty of the one or more devices.

5. The method as claimed in Claim 1. further comprising updating the software of the one or more devices when the devices are not updated with the latest software.

6. The method as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the one or more devices are one of inverters, solar devices, and batteries.

7. The method as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the one or more parameters are one of temperature, voltage, current, power, charging time, and boost voltage.

8. The method as claimed in Claim 1, further comprising:
determining and configuring (302) the predefined parameters; and
configuring values of the predefined parameters,
wherein the method is performed in a server managing the one or more devices.

9. An apparatus (400) for testing and tracking of one or more devices, comprising:
a memory (402) to store processor-executable instructions;
a processor (404) that, upon execution of the instructions, causes the processor (404) to:
collect values of one or more parameters from the one or more devices;
compare the collected values with predefined values of the parameters of the one or more devices; and
update the status of the one or more devices based on the comparison of the collected values with predefined values of the parameters.