Abstract: TITLE: “ADVANCED ROCKET LAUNCHER SIMULATION SYSTEM” 7. ABSTRACT The present invention relates to an advanced rocket launcher simulation system (100) designed to provide realistic, safe, and cost-effective training for military and law enforcement personnel. The system replicates the physical handling, aiming, and firing of rocket launchers, incorporating components such as a velocity measurement mechanism (1), recoil simulation system (12), and customizable tactical accessories (3, 4). The system includes an electronic triggering mechanism (32) for precision firing and a target engagement system (34) with automatic calibration to account for environmental factors. Simulated gas-loaded rounds (35) provide tactile feedback, while the high-performance graphics unit simulates varying weather conditions, enhancing training realism. The system allows for modular customization, enabling the simulation of different rocket launcher models and accessories. The Figure associated with abstract is Fig. 1.
DESC:4. DESCRIPTION
Technical Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to the field of military and defense technology, specifically to an advanced rocket launcher simulation termed as the rocket launcher simulation system.
Background of the Invention
The rocket launcher is a crucial tool in modern military arsenals, providing powerful offensive capabilities in various combat scenarios. It allows military personnel to engage armored vehicles, fortified positions, and enemy forces with precision and lethal force. Rocket launchers have become indispensable weapons on the battlefield due to their versatility, mobility, and devastating firepower.
In the context of the Indian Army, rocket launchers play a vital role in both offensive and defensive operations. These weapons enable soldiers to neutralize key threats, particularly in difficult terrains where conventional artillery or air support may not be effective. One of the most advanced rocket launchers in the Indian Army's arsenal is the RL Mark 4, a cutting-edge system designed for high-precision strikes against enemy targets. With its long-range capabilities and powerful warheads, the RL Mark 4 is particularly effective against armored vehicles, bunkers, and other hardened military installations.
The RL Mark 4 is a highly sophisticated weapon, incorporating advanced targeting systems, precision-guided rockets, and versatile firing modes. This complexity, however, comes with the need for extensive training to ensure that soldiers can operate the system efficiently and accurately under combat conditions. Effective training in the use of rocket launchers like the RL Mark 4 is critical to mission success and the safety of the personnel involved.
While live-fire training with rocket launchers is the most effective way to prepare soldiers for real-world combat, it poses significant challenges. First and foremost are the safety concerns. Handling live rockets during training exercises can be extremely dangerous. Rocket launchers fire high-explosive projectiles, and any mistake in handling or operation can lead to catastrophic accidents, causing injuries or even fatalities. Ensuring the safety of both trainees and instructors during live-fire exercises is a paramount concern, and this often results in limiting the frequency and scope of such exercises.
Additionally, live-fire training is resource-intensive and costly. Each training session requires a significant expenditure of rockets, which are expensive to produce and maintain. Beyond the cost of ammunition, the wear and tear on the launchers themselves, as well as the maintenance of firing ranges, contributes to the high financial burden associated with live-fire training. Moreover, firing live rockets during training can damage the training grounds and requires constant upkeep of designated firing ranges. These ranges must be secured, managed, and protected to prevent unauthorized access and ensure that exercises are conducted safely. The financial and logistical hurdles involved in this process place a heavy burden on military budgets.
Logistical challenges also compound the difficulties of live-fire training. Transporting and storing live rockets is a complex task requiring high security and careful management. Rockets are classified as hazardous materials and must be handled with extreme care to avoid accidents. In many cases, rocket launcher training can only be conducted at specific, highly controlled locations, making it difficult for soldiers to gain the necessary experience in using these weapons.
Another significant issue is the environmental impact of live-fire training exercises. Firing rockets can cause extensive damage to the surrounding environment, leading to deforestation, erosion, and soil degradation. The explosions generated by rocket fire create noise pollution and can also have detrimental effects on local wildlife. In sensitive ecological areas, this environmental damage can be long-lasting, forcing military authorities to seek alternative training methods that are more sustainable.
These challenges necessitate a more practical, cost-effective, and safe approach to rocket launcher training. However, the complexity of the RL Mark 4 means that traditional small arms training simulators are not adequate for this purpose.
In response to the challenges posed by live-fire training, many militaries, including the Indian Army, have adopted training simulators for various weapons. Simulators have long been used to train soldiers in handling and operating small arms such as rifles, pistols, and light machine guns. These simulators allow trainees to practice their skills in a safe, controlled environment, without the need for live ammunition or the risks associated with live firing.
Small arms simulators typically consist of weapon replicas connected to computer systems that generate virtual environments for training. Soldiers use the simulated weapons to aim and fire at digital targets displayed on a screen or through a virtual reality (VR) interface. These systems are designed to replicate the weight, feel, and operation of the real weapons as closely as possible, allowing trainees to develop muscle memory and hone their marksmanship skills.
For small arms training, simulators offer several key advantages. They eliminate the risk of accidents associated with live ammunition, reduce the cost of training by avoiding the need for real bullets, and allow soldiers to train more frequently. Simulators are also portable and flexible, making it easier to set up training sessions in various locations without requiring specialized firing ranges. Additionally, advanced simulators incorporate sophisticated tracking systems that provide detailed feedback on a trainee's performance, helping instructors to identify areas for improvement.
However, when it comes to more complex weapons like rocket launchers, the limitations of existing simulators become apparent. Rocket launchers, unlike small arms, involve indirect fire and more complex ballistic trajectories, making it difficult to simulate their operation accurately using small arms training systems. The need for a realistic simulation of a weapon as sophisticated as the RL Mark 4 presents challenges that are not adequately addressed by existing training technologies.
The simulators currently available for small arms are insufficient for training soldiers in the operation of advanced rocket launchers like the RL Mark 4. One of the primary limitations of these simulators is their inability to replicate the complexity of rocket launcher operations. Small arms simulators are generally designed to simulate direct fire weapons with relatively simple firing mechanisms. However, rocket launchers like the RL Mark 4 require soldiers to perform more advanced tasks, including target acquisition, ballistic calculations, and indirect fire operations.
A critical drawback of small arms simulators is their lack of realistic recoil and feedback. When firing a rocket launcher, soldiers experience a powerful recoil as the rocket is propelled from the launcher. This recoil is a critical part of the firing experience, and it affects the soldier's handling of the weapon. Small arms simulators, while capable of replicating the weight and feel of lighter firearms, often fail to provide the necessary tactile feedback for larger, more powerful weapons like rocket launchers. Without this feedback, soldiers cannot develop the muscle memory and physical coordination needed to handle the RL Mark 4 effectively in a real-world scenario.
Moreover, small arms simulators are limited in their ability to simulate complex battlefield scenarios. Rocket launchers are typically used in situations where indirect fire is necessary, such as when engaging targets that are out of sight or behind cover. The RL Mark 4, for instance, may be used to fire at long-range targets that require precise calculations for trajectory, wind speed, and elevation. These factors are difficult to simulate in small arms training systems, which tend to focus on straightforward marksmanship.
Another disadvantage is the inability of small arms simulators to replicate the environmental and operational conditions that rocket launchers are used in. Rocket launchers are often deployed in rugged, unpredictable environments where terrain, weather, and enemy movements all affect the outcome of an operation. Simulators designed for small arms training typically lack the sophistication needed to simulate these variables accurately, which limits the training experience and leaves soldiers unprepared for real combat situations.
Given the shortcomings of existing simulators and the challenges associated with live-fire training, there is a clear and urgent need for a dedicated rocket launcher simulator that can accurately mimic the operation of the RL Mark 4. This simulator would provide the Indian Army with a safe, cost-effective, and highly realistic alternative to live-fire training, allowing soldiers to gain the necessary experience in handling this sophisticated weapon system without the associated risks.
A dedicated simulator for the RL Mark 4 would replicate not only the physical characteristics of the weapon, such as its weight, recoil, and firing mechanism, but also its ballistic properties. The simulator would need to incorporate advanced ballistics software to accurately simulate the trajectory of rockets fired from the launcher, taking into account factors such as wind speed, distance, and elevation. This would allow soldiers to practice aiming and firing in a variety of conditions, from basic target practice to complex battlefield scenarios.
In addition to providing realistic physical feedback, the simulator would enable soldiers to train in different tactical environments, simulating the conditions they are likely to encounter in the field. The system could generate a wide range of virtual environments, from urban combat zones to mountainous terrain, complete with varying weather conditions and enemy behavior. By training in these environments, soldiers would develop the skills and confidence needed to operate the RL Mark 4 effectively in real combat situations.
Moreover, a dedicated simulator would allow for repeated practice without the cost or risk associated with live ammunition. Soldiers could conduct multiple training sessions, refining their skills and improving their proficiency over time. The simulator would also provide detailed performance feedback, allowing instructors to assess each trainee's abilities and tailor their training accordingly.
Brief Summary of the Invention
The following presents a simplified summary of the disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding to the reader. This summary is not an extensive overview of the disclosure, and it does not identify key/critical elements of the invention or delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts disclosed herein in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The primary objective of the present invention is to provide an advanced rocket launcher simulation system that replicates the physical and operational characteristics of real-world rocket launchers. The system aims to offer military and law enforcement personnel an immersive training experience that eliminates the inherent risks associated with live-fire exercises. By simulating the mechanical operation, aiming, and firing of a rocket launcher, the system provides trainees with hands-on experience in handling complex weapons, thus enhancing their operational proficiency.
Another object of the present invention is to significantly reduce the costs associated with traditional live-fire training. Rocket launchers, particularly advanced models like the RL Mark 4, are expensive to maintain, and the cost of live rockets, ammunition, and upkeep of firing ranges adds up quickly. The simulation system allows for repeated training sessions without incurring the high operational expenses of live firing. This results in significant cost savings for military organizations, enabling them to allocate resources more efficiently.
The present invention also seeks to address the logistical challenges of live-fire rocket launcher training. Transporting and storing live ammunition, particularly rockets, involves strict safety protocols, extensive security measures, and the availability of dedicated facilities. The rocket launcher simulation system eliminates the need for live ammunition, thus simplifying logistics. Training can be conducted in a wide variety of locations, including indoor environments, without compromising safety.
Safety is another key objective of the present invention. Training with live rocket launchers presents considerable risks, including the possibility of accidental detonation, misfires, and injuries to personnel. The simulation system removes these risks by eliminating the need for live rockets. Trainees can practice handling, aiming, and firing the simulated launcher in a controlled environment, ensuring safety for both the trainees and instructors. The system is also designed to provide realistic feedback, ensuring that trainees can develop the necessary skills to handle real rocket launchers safely and effectively.
Environmental sustainability is also a central goal of the present invention. Live-fire training exercises often result in environmental degradation, including deforestation, soil erosion, and noise pollution. The simulation system minimizes the environmental impact of training by replacing live rockets with virtual projectiles. This allows military organizations to conduct frequent and intensive training without harming the surrounding environment.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a versatile and customizable training platform. The simulation system is designed to replicate different types of rocket launchers and can be configured to simulate various operational scenarios. This flexibility allows military organizations to tailor the training to specific mission requirements, thus enhancing the preparedness of personnel. The system can also simulate different environmental conditions, such as wind, rain, or fog, further increasing the realism of the training experience.
In addition to addressing cost, safety, logistics, and environmental concerns, the present invention also seeks to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of rocket launcher training. By providing trainees with immediate feedback on their performance, the system allows for continuous improvement. Trainees can repeat exercises until they achieve the desired level of proficiency. The system can also track the progress of each trainee, generating performance reports that instructors can use to identify strengths and areas for improvement.
The present invention, the Advanced Rocket Launcher Simulation System, provides a novel and comprehensive solution for training military and law enforcement personnel in the use of rocket launchers. The system replicates the key components and operational characteristics of real rocket launchers while offering significant advantages in terms of safety, cost, logistics, and environmental sustainability.
The simulation system comprises a venturi tube for fluid velocity measurement, which is secured by a venturi clamp. This configuration allows for precise control of the virtual projectile's velocity, thereby simulating the physics of real rocket launches. The system also includes a set of tactical accessories, such as a red dot sight for enhanced aiming accuracy and a shot counter to track the number of rounds fired. These accessories are mounted on picatinny rails, which allow for modular customization of the system, enabling trainees to practice with different configurations of sighting systems.
A critical aspect of the system is its recoil kit assembly, which is designed to simulate the recoil force experienced when firing a real rocket launcher. The recoil kit comprises a spring-loaded mechanism and hydraulic pistons, which work together to provide adjustable recoil feedback based on the type of rocket being simulated. A feedback sensor continuously measures the force exerted during firing and adjusts the recoil simulation accordingly, providing a realistic training experience.
The barrel of the simulation system is designed to direct virtual projectile trajectories. It includes an integrated laser unit (ILU) that is responsible for target engagement. The ILU is housed inside the barrel and is connected to the system via wired communication, allowing for precise alignment with the simulated targets. The ILU also features automatic calibration capabilities, adjusting for environmental factors such as wind speed and target distance, thus providing a highly realistic simulation of the aiming and firing process.
A key feature of the present invention is its triggering operation, which involves an electronic switch for precise trigger activation. This electronic system replicates the firing mechanism of a real rocket launcher, allowing trainees to experience the timing and force required to fire the weapon. The electronic switch is linked to the system's control unit, ensuring that the trigger is activated only when the system detects proper target alignment, thus preventing accidental firings.
The system also includes rounds loaded with gas, which simulate the loading and firing of real rocket projectiles. These gas-loaded rounds provide variable pressure settings, allowing the system to replicate different types of rockets, such as anti-tank or anti-aircraft projectiles. This feature adds to the versatility of the system, enabling trainees to practice with a wide range of rocket types in different operational scenarios.
Another important aspect of the present invention is its ability to simulate environmental effects. The system is equipped with a high-performance graphics unit that generates realistic environmental conditions, including wind, rain, fog, and dust. These environmental factors influence the trajectory of the virtual projectiles, requiring trainees to adjust their aiming and firing techniques accordingly. This feature ensures that trainees are prepared to operate rocket launchers in a variety of challenging conditions, enhancing their overall readiness for combat.
The system is designed for modular customization. The picatinny rails allow for the attachment of different accessories, such as thermal imaging devices or night vision optics, providing flexibility in the type of training conducted. Additionally, the barrel and front handle are constructed to simulate different rocket launcher models, allowing trainees to practice with various types of rocket launchers using the same base system.
The present invention also includes an advanced firing mechanism that incorporates a failsafe. This feature prevents accidental trigger activation unless the system detects that the launcher is properly aligned with the target. This safety mechanism ensures that trainees cannot engage in unsafe firing practices during the simulation, further enhancing the overall safety of the training environment.
The system is designed to provide comprehensive data analysis and feedback. The shot counter tracks the number of rounds fired, and the system continuously monitors the trainee's performance, including aiming accuracy, trigger timing, and projectile trajectory. This data is fed into the system's control unit, which generates real-time feedback for the trainee. Instructors can access detailed performance reports, allowing them to assess the trainee's progress and identify areas for improvement.
Additionally, the system includes a recoil kit assembly that simulates the force experienced when firing real rockets. The recoil kit includes adjustable hydraulic pistons and a feedback sensor that modulates the intensity of the recoil based on the type of rocket being simulated. This feature provides trainees with a realistic experience of handling the rocket launcher under different conditions, thus improving their muscle memory and operational proficiency.
The cocking operation is another important feature of the present invention. This operation simulates the mechanical action of preparing the launcher for firing, providing trainees with hands-on experience in handling the weapon. The system is designed to replicate the exact sequence of actions required to cock a real rocket launcher, further enhancing the realism of the training experience.
The advanced rocket launcher simulation system can be applied in a variety of military and law enforcement training environments. It is particularly well-suited for training personnel in the use of rocket launchers like the RL Mark 4, which are commonly used in combat situations where precision and accuracy are critical. The system can be used to train soldiers in basic handling and operation, as well as in more advanced combat scenarios that require the use of indirect fire, target acquisition, and ballistic calculations.
In addition to military applications, the system can also be used in law enforcement training, particularly for special operations units that may need to engage in high-risk operations involving armored vehicles or fortified positions. The system's ability to replicate different rocket types and firing conditions makes it a versatile tool for preparing law enforcement personnel for a wide range of operational scenarios.
The system is also suitable for use in tactical training centers, where military and law enforcement personnel undergo specialized training in the use of advanced weapons. These centers can use the system to simulate different combat environments, allowing trainees to practice in a variety of conditions, from urban warfare to mountainous terrain.
The Advanced Rocket Launcher Simulation System offers several key advantages over traditional live-fire training methods. First and foremost, it enhances safety by eliminating the need for live rockets, thus reducing the risk of accidents during training. The system also provides cost savings by eliminating the expenses associated with live ammunition, maintenance of firing ranges, and transportation and storage of hazardous materials.
The system's modular design allows for versatility in training, enabling military and law enforcement personnel to practice with different types of rocket launchers and tactical accessories. The ability to simulate various environmental conditions further enhances the realism of the training experience, ensuring that trainees are prepared for the complexities of real-world combat.
Another major advantage is the system's ability to provide immediate feedback and performance analysis. Trainees can improve their skills through repeated practice, and instructors can monitor their progress in real time, making adjustments to the training as necessary.
Finally, the system promotes environmental sustainability by reducing the environmental impact of training exercises. By replacing live rockets with virtual projectiles, the system eliminates the noise pollution, deforestation, and soil degradation associated with traditional live-fire training exercises, ensuring that military organizations can train their personnel in an environmentally responsible manner.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description presented in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig’s. 1-2a illustrates an advanced rocket launcher simulation system with its components in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2b illustrates flow chart of the simulation system in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
It is appreciated that not all aspects and structures of the present invention are visible in a single drawing, and as such multiple views of the invention are presented so as to clearly show the structures of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
It is to be understood that the present disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The present disclosure is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
The use of “including”, “comprising” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. The terms “a” and “an” herein do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced items. Further, the use of terms “first”, “second”, and “third”, and the like, herein do not denote any order, quantity, or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another.
The present invention relates to an advanced rocket launcher simulation system designed to provide a safe, cost-effective, and realistic training environment for military and law enforcement personnel. The system replicates the handling, aiming, and firing of real-world rocket launchers, such as the RL Mark 4, using advanced simulation technologies. By simulating the mechanical operations of a rocket launcher, the system offers a hands-on training experience that significantly reduces the risks and costs associated with live-fire training exercises.
In an exemplary embodiment, the system comprises several key components that work together to replicate the physical characteristics and operational processes of a real rocket launcher. These components include a venturi tube for fluid velocity measurement, a barrel for directing projectile trajectories, a recoil kit assembly to simulate the recoil force of firing, and tactical accessories like a red dot sight and shot counter to aid in precision aiming. Additionally, the system includes an integrated laser unit (ILU) for target engagement and gas-loaded rounds to replicate the loading and firing experience of real rockets.
The system is designed to provide adjustable and customizable features to enhance the realism of the training experience. For example, the recoil kit assembly can simulate variable recoil intensities depending on the type of rocket being simulated, while the integrated laser unit automatically calibrates for environmental conditions such as wind speed and target distance. The system is also modular, allowing for different configurations of tactical accessories and rocket launcher types, making it a versatile platform for various training scenarios.
One of the key features of the present invention is its electronic triggering mechanism, which replicates the process of firing a rocket launcher with precision. The trigger operation is controlled by an electronic switch, ensuring that the trigger is only activated when the system detects proper alignment with the target. This feature enhances safety by preventing accidental firings during training.
The system is also equipped with advanced data analysis and feedback capabilities. Trainees can receive immediate feedback on their performance, including information on their aiming accuracy, trigger timing, and the trajectory of the simulated projectiles. This data is captured and analyzed by the system’s control unit, which generates performance reports that can be used by instructors to evaluate the trainee’s progress and provide targeted feedback.
The present invention is further described with reference to the accompanying figures, which illustrate various components and aspects of the rocket launcher simulation system. The reference numerals used in the drawings correspond to those used in the claims, and they provide a detailed understanding of the system's construction and operation.
In Figures 1-2, the venturi tube (1) is shown as a key component of the system, responsible for measuring fluid velocity, which is essential in simulating the physics of rocket launches. The venturi tube is secured by a venturi clamp (2), ensuring that it remains stable during operation. This setup is crucial for maintaining the precision of the projectile trajectory simulation.
The barrel (8), as depicted is another main component responsible for directing the virtual projectiles along their simulated trajectories. The barrel is designed with picatinny rails (9) that allow for the attachment of tactical accessories, such as the red dot sight (3) and shot counter (4). These accessories are modular and can be swapped out for other systems, such as thermal imaging or night vision optics, depending on the training requirements. The front handle (10) is located near the barrel and provides the trainee with enhanced maneuverability, especially during close-quarters training scenarios.
The recoil kit assembly (12), as illustrated is an integral part of the system, providing a realistic simulation of the recoil experienced when firing a real rocket launcher. The recoil kit comprises a spring-loaded mechanism and hydraulic pistons, which work together to simulate recoil forces. A feedback sensor continuously monitors the intensity of the recoil and adjusts the simulation accordingly, providing a variable recoil experience based on the type of rocket being simulated.
The integrated laser unit (ILU) (34), located inside the barrel, is responsible for engaging targets during training exercises. The ILU operates via wired communication and ensures precise alignment with the simulated targets. Additionally, the ILU includes automatic calibration features that adjust for environmental factors such as wind speed and target distance. This level of precision makes the ILU a critical component in ensuring the accuracy of the simulation.
In Figure 2b, the triggering operation (32) is shown, which is controlled by an electronic switch (33). This switch replicates the action of firing a real rocket launcher, allowing trainees to experience the timing and force required to activate the launcher. The system’s control unit ensures that the trigger is only activated when the system detects proper target alignment, thus preventing accidental firings during training.
The system also includes rounds loaded with gas (35), as depicted in Figure 3. These gas-loaded rounds simulate the process of loading and firing real rockets. The system allows for variable pressure settings, which replicate different rocket types, such as anti-tank or anti-aircraft rockets. The use of gas-loaded rounds adds to the realism of the training experience, as it simulates the tactile and auditory feedback associated with real rocket launches.
In addition to these core components, the system is equipped with a high-performance graphics unit, which generates realistic environmental conditions such as wind, rain, fog, and dust. These environmental factors influence the trajectory of the virtual projectiles, requiring trainees to adjust their aiming and firing techniques accordingly. This feature ensures that trainees are prepared to operate rocket launchers in a variety of challenging conditions, further enhancing their combat readiness.
The method of manufacturing the rocket launcher simulation system (100) involves several key steps, each designed to ensure the accuracy and realism of the simulation. The manufacturing process begins with the fabrication of the venturi tube (1), which is critical for fluid velocity measurement. The venturi tube is secured with a venturi clamp (2) to ensure stability during operation.
Next, the tactical accessories, including the red dot sight (3) and shot counter (4), are assembled and mounted on the picatinny rails (9). These accessories are designed to be modular, allowing for easy customization depending on the specific training requirements. The launcher frame, which includes the shoulder rest (5), bipod handle (6), and grip handle (7), is then constructed to provide trainees with the handling and stability needed to operate the simulated launcher.
The barrel (8) is manufactured to simulate projectile trajectories and includes attachment points for additional accessories. The cocking mechanism (31) is integrated into the system to replicate the mechanical process of preparing the launcher for firing. This feature is essential for providing trainees with a realistic experience of handling the launcher during training exercises.
The electronic switch (33), which controls the triggering operation, is installed next. This switch is linked to the integrated laser unit (ILU) (34) inside the barrel, allowing for precise target engagement during training exercises. The gas-loaded rounds (35) are then produced, with variable pressure settings to simulate different types of rockets.
Finally, the recoil kit assembly (12) is incorporated into the system to simulate the recoil effects experienced when firing real rockets. The system components are then assembled into a comprehensive simulator platform, integrating the high-performance graphics unit and environmental simulation software. The system is thoroughly tested to ensure that it meets the required performance standards before being deployed for training purposes.
The method of using the rocket launcher simulation system (100) begins with the initialization of the system and the selection of the desired training scenario. The trainee first engages the cocking operation (31), which simulates the mechanical process of preparing the rocket launcher for firing. This action replicates the sequence of steps required to cock a real rocket launcher.
Next, the trainee uses the electronic switch (33) to activate the triggering operation (32). The system ensures that the trigger can only be activated when the integrated laser unit (ILU) (34) has properly aligned with the simulated target. This feature enhances safety by preventing accidental firings.
Once the launcher is cocked and aligned with the target, the trainee can proceed to aim at the target using the red dot sight (3) mounted on the picatinny rails (9). The trainee then activates the trigger, which simulates the firing of a real rocket. The system generates firing effects using the gas-loaded rounds (35), which replicate the auditory and tactile feedback of firing real rockets. The recoil kit assembly (12) simulates the recoil force, providing a realistic training experience.
During the exercise, the system monitors the trainee’s performance, including aiming accuracy, trigger timing, and projectile trajectory. This data is fed into the system’s control unit, which generates real-time feedback for the trainee. After the exercise, the trainee can review their performance using the system’s data analysis features, which provide detailed reports on their accuracy and efficiency.
The trainee can repeat the exercise as many times as necessary to improve their skills. The system allows for customization of the training scenario, including adjustments to the environmental conditions simulated by the high-performance graphics unit. Trainees can practice in a variety of conditions, such as wind, rain, or fog, to ensure that they are prepared for the complexities of real-world combat.
In conclusion, the rocket launcher simulation system (100) provides a comprehensive, realistic, and safe training environment for military and law enforcement personnel. The system’s advanced simulation features, including its recoil kit assembly, integrated laser unit, and electronic trigger mechanism, replicate the experience of using a real rocket launcher while minimizing the risks associated with live-fire training. Through detailed performance feedback and customizable training scenarios, the system ensures that trainees are well-prepared to operate rocket launchers in various combat situations.
,CLAIMS:5. CLAIMS
I/We claim:
1. A rocket launcher simulation system (100), comprising:
a venturi tube (1) configured for fluid velocity measurement secured by a venturi clamp (2);
tactical accessories including a red dot sight (3) for enhanced aiming accuracy and a shot counter (4) to track rounds fired;
a shoulder rest (5), a bipod handle (6), and a grip handle (7) configured for improved handling and stability;
a barrel (8) configured for directing projectile trajectories, with picatinny rails (9) for mounting accessories;
a front handle (10) configured for close-quarters maneuverability and a trigger mechanism (11) for firing;
a recoil kit assembly (12) configured to provide adjustable recoil simulation;
Characterized in that,
the system (100) includes a cocking operation (31) that simulates the mechanical action of preparing the launcher for firing;
the system (100) includes a triggering operation (32) involving an electronic switch (33) for precise trigger activation;
the system (100) includes a target engagement system utilizing an integrated laser unit (ILU) inside the barrel with wired communication (34) for precise alignment with simulated targets; and
the system (100) includes rounds loaded with gas (35) for realistic loading and firing experience.
2. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the recoil kit assembly (12) comprises:
a spring-loaded mechanism integrated within the launcher body to simulate recoil force;
a dampening unit composed of adjustable hydraulic pistons to modulate the intensity of the recoil;
a feedback sensor connected to the control unit, measuring the force exerted during the firing operation and adjusting the recoil simulation accordingly;
wherein, the recoil kit is designed to provide variable recoil intensity based on the simulated rocket type and firing conditions.
3. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the tactical accessories mounted on the picatinny rails (9) are modular and interchangeable, allowing for customization of sighting systems, including thermal imaging and night vision optics.
4. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the shot counter (4) is linked to a real-time data display, providing information on the number of rounds fired and remaining ammunition.
5. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the barrel (8) and front handle (10) are designed to simulate different rocket launcher types through modular configurations.
6. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the integrated laser unit (ILU) inside the barrel (34) is equipped with automatic calibration features to adjust for environmental factors and target distance.
7. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the firing mechanism includes a failsafe that prevents accidental triggering unless the system detects a proper target alignment.
8. The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rounds loaded with gas (35) simulate variable pressures to replicate different projectile types, such as anti-tank or anti-aircraft rockets.
9. The system as claimed in claim 1, comprising a high-performance graphics unit that simulates environmental effects, including wind, rain, and dust, which influence the projectile's trajectory.
10. A method of manufacturing an advanced rocket launcher simulation system (100), as claimed in claim 1, comprising the steps of:
(a) fabricating a venturi tube (1) and securing it with a venturi clamp (2) for fluid velocity measurement;
(b) assembling tactical accessories, including a red dot sight (3) and shot counter (4), on modular picatinny rails (9);
(c) constructing the launcher frame with a shoulder rest (5), bipod handle (6), and grip handle (7) for enhanced handling and stability;
(d) manufacturing a barrel (8) configured to simulate projectile trajectories and incorporating modular attachment points for accessories;
(e) integrating a cocking mechanism (31) to simulate the loading operation of the rocket launcher;
(f) installing an electronic switch (33) for precise triggering, linked to a target engagement system with an integrated laser unit (ILU) inside the barrel (34) for target alignment;
(g) producing gas-loaded rounds (35) for simulating realistic firing, with variable pressure settings;
(h) incorporating a recoil kit assembly (12) to simulate recoil effects upon firing;
(i) assembling the system components into a comprehensive simulator platform, integrating high-performance graphics and environmental simulation software.
6. DATE AND SIGNATURE
Dated this on 16th September 2024
Signature
Mr. Srinivas Maddipati
IN/PA 3124-In house Patent Agent
(For., Zen Technologies Limited)
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 202341067460-PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 2 | 202341067460-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY(FORM-28) [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 3 | 202341067460-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 4 | 202341067460-FORM 1 [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 5 | 202341067460-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI(FORM-28) [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 6 | 202341067460-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 7 | 202341067460-DRAWINGS [09-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-09 |
| 8 | 202341067460-Proof of Right [13-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-13 |
| 9 | 202341067460-FORM-26 [13-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-13 |
| 10 | 202341067460-FORM 3 [13-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-13 |
| 11 | 202341067460-ENDORSEMENT BY INVENTORS [13-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-13 |
| 12 | 202341067460-Defence-30-08-2024.pdf | 2024-08-30 |
| 13 | 202341067460-DRAWING [16-09-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-09-16 |
| 14 | 202341067460-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [16-09-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-09-16 |
| 15 | 202341067460-FORM-9 [30-09-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-09-30 |
| 16 | 202341067460-MSME CERTIFICATE [11-10-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-10-11 |
| 17 | 202341067460-FORM28 [11-10-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-10-11 |
| 18 | 202341067460-FORM 18A [11-10-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-10-11 |
| 19 | Reply from Defence.pdf | 2024-12-20 |