Abstract: Disclosed herein is a wideband Doherty Power Amplifier (DPA) circuit. The wideband DPA circuit comprises a main PA, an auxiliary PA, and an input power splitter configured to split input power into main PA and auxiliary PA. Further, the circuit comprises a multi-phasing block component to provide phase difference between the main PA and the auxiliary PA. Furthermore, the circuit comprises a parasitic compensator & impedance inverter connected to the main PA to compensate a parasitic load on the main PA and modulate load in the DPA. Also, the circuit comprises a parasitic canceler connected to the auxiliary PA to compensate for the parasitic load on the auxiliary PA and avoid leakage of current from the main PA to the auxiliary PA, when the auxiliary PA is in an ‘OFF’ state. Additionally, the circuit comprises an output impedance transformer connected to the main PA and the auxiliary PA.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS:
[0001] This application is related to and claims priority from the Indian Provisional Patent
Application No: 202341082863 filed on 5th December 2023.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure, in general, relates to power amplifiers, and more specifically,
to a wideband Doherty power amplifier with device parasitic compensation and impedance
inversion.
BACKGROUND
[0003] In wireless communication, advanced modulation techniques such as Quadrature
Amplitude Modulation (QAM) and Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)
have been widely employed to achieve high data rate and spectrum efficiency. To achieve
spectrum efficiency, front-end Power Amplifier (PA) must operate significantly below its
saturation to prevent signal distortion (non-linearity), since the transmitted signal has a high
Peak-to-Average-Power Ratio (PAPR). However, traditional PA architectures, such as class
B/C, often suffer from poor efficiency when operating at significant Output Back-Off
(OPBO). Consequently, the conventional PAs lead to an increase in Operating Expenditures
(OPEX) of the wireless network, as they play a vital role in determining overall wireless link
performance.
[0004] Various topologies have been proposed recently for enhancing the efficiency of the
PAs. Some of these topologies include Envelope Tracking, Dynamic Load Modulation
(DLM), Doherty Power Amplifier (DPA), and Envelope Elimination and Restoration.
Among these, DPA is one of the frequently used topologies in commercial wireless systems,
since it is a fully analogue architecture that amplifies complex and modulated signals
efficiently over an extensive dynamic range and handles high PAPR signals.
[0005] FIG. 1 illustrates circuit diagram of a conventional DPA 100, which includes an input
power splitter 101, which splits the input power across a main PA 103 path and an auxiliary
PA 105 path. In an example, the main PA 103 is biased (i.e., gate voltage value setting) at its
pinch-off threshold or at a value which is slightly above the pinch off threshold. This ensures
3
that the main PA 103 operates at low power levels. On the other hand, the auxiliary PA 105
is biased well below the pinch-off threshold, which enables the auxiliary PA 105 to operate
only when input power drive is high and crosses a certain a threshold value. The main PA
103 includes an input offset line 1 1071, an input matching network 1 1091, a transistor 1 (Q1)
1101, an output matching network 1 1111, and a quarter wave transformer 1131. The auxiliary
PA 105 includes an input offset line 2 1072, an input matching network 2 1092, a transistor 2
(Q2) 1102, an output matching network 2 1112, and a phase-offset line 115. Further, a quarter
wave transformer 2 1132 is placed at junction ‘J’, where the main PA 103 and the auxiliary
PA 105 are connected.
[0006] By operation, in the conventional DPA 100, at low power level, only the main PA
103 operates, while reaching a maximum voltage (i.e., voltage saturation) even at the low
output current. At a certain back-off, when the output voltage of the main PA 103 reaches its
saturation value, the auxiliary PA 105 starts operating and gradually contributes to the output
current, thereby reducing the load on the main PA 103. Therefore, the load seen by the main
PA 103 reduces, whereas the output current still increases, thereby keeping the output voltage
of the main PA 103 constant at its saturation value. In other words, the main PA 103 operates
at a voltage saturation even at the back-off power, and thereby endures high efficiency. The
auxiliary PA 105 starts contributing an additional current after the back-off, thereby keeping
the main PA 103 operating at a saturation value, beyond the back-off region, till the auxiliary
PA 105 reaches its saturation. Thus, the conventional DPA 100 has good efficiency from
back-off to the peak value, where both the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 reach their
saturation, resulting into dynamic range of input power level for which the DPA 100 operates
in high efficiency region.
[0007] Additionally, in the conventional DPA 100, the transistor Q1 1101 of the main PA
103 and the transistor Q2 1102 of the auxiliary PA 105 are matched to their optimum loads
using the output matching networks 1111 and 1112. Due to load modulation, the output of the
matching network 1111 also varies as the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 interact
through their currents. In other words, load modulation occurs due to interaction between the
main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 through their currents. Therefore, the matching
network 1111 must ensure that, at different values of the input power drive, an optimum load
is always presented to the transistor Q1 1101 even when the terminating loads of the output
matching network 1111 are varying due to the load modulation. This requirement makes it
4
difficult for the matching logic implemented on the conventional DPA 100 to cover a wide
bandwidth and wide dynamic range of input power drive during an actual operation of the
DPA.
[0008] Additionally, the quarter wave transformer 1 1131 on the main PA 103 is used to
provide an impedance inversion from inherent low impedance (i.e., R0/2 seen by the main
PA 103 towards junction ‘J’) to the required high impedance value (2R0) seen by the output
matching network 1111 of the main PA 103 at back-off. This is required for the main PA 103
to operate in saturation region at back-off power level, to achieve the desired high efficiency
at low power region. However, due to impedance transformation introduced by the quarter
wave transformer 1 1131, an additional phase shift of 90o must be added at the output of the
main PA 103. To compensate for this additional phase shift, a phase offset of 90o must be
added at the input offset line 2 1072 of the auxiliary PA 105.
[0009] Moreover, in the auxiliary PA 105, the phase-offset line 115 must be designed to
ensure that no current leaks from the main PA 103 to the auxiliary PA 105, when the auxiliary
PA 105 is in ‘OFF’ condition. The leakage may occur due to parasitic load of the device used
in the auxiliary PA 105 and the output matching network 1112, which presents a non-open
circuit impedance. Therefore, on the conventional DPA 100, the phase-offset line 115 must
be configured to transform the non-open circuit impedance to the open circuit at junction ‘J’,
so that the main PA 103 current does not leak to the auxiliary PA 105. However, the
introduction of the phase-offset line 115 adds an additional phase offset at the output of the
auxiliary PA 105. In order to compensate for this additional phase offset, the input offset line
1 1071 must be used in the main PA 103 to provide the same phase offset. Since the load at
the terminating junction ‘J’ is R0/2 (where R0 is typically 50 Ω), an additional quarter wave
transformer, i.e., quarter wave transformer 2 1132 must be used to transform the standard
50Ω load to the required load at the junction ‘J’.
[0010] Due to the need to compensate various additional phase shifts, as explained above,
the conventional DPA 100 suffers from numerous limitations. One of the main limitations is
that the conventional DPA 100 is limited only to narrowband operation due to the narrow
band impedance inversion by the quarter wave transformer 1 1131 and the quarter wave
transformer 2 1132. Even if the input matching network 1 1091 and the output matching
5
network 1111 on the main PA 103, as well as the input matching network 2 1092 and the
output matching network 1112 on the auxiliary PA 105 are broadband, the impedance
inversion by the quarter wave transformer 1 1131 still limits the performance. Also, though
the conventional matching networks can match the standard load R0 (usually 50 Ω) to the
required optimum load impedance Ropt at transistor intrinsic current generator reference plane
over a wide bandwidth, ensuring the application of the Ropt becomes uncertain when the
standard load R0 undergoes changes with the input drive due to load modulation. Moreover,
the conventional DPA 100 exhibits leakage of the current from the main PA 103 to the
auxiliary PA 105, when the auxiliary PA 105 is in the ‘OFF’ state. This reduces the efficiency
and gain of the DPA at low power operation. The leakage may be reduced by the phase-offset
line 115, but only in a narrow band region. Consequently, the loads required in the
conventional DPA 100 cannot guarantee a nonlinear compensation.
[0011] Furthermore, in the conventional DPA 100, the matching networks of the main PA
103 and the auxiliary PA 105 are designed independently without considering the overall
device parasitic of the DPA 100. For example, the output matching network 2 1112 of the
auxiliary PA 105 is designed considering its operation only at the saturation point. Since the
parasitic of the auxiliary PA 105 and the output matching network 2 1112 are not considered,
it becomes challenging to obtain a required load presented to the main PA 103 at back-off.
This once again results into leakage of current from the main PA 103 towards the auxiliary
PA 105 at back-off, when the auxiliary transistor is in ‘OFF’ condition. Though these
variations are minimal and can be disregarded, however, in devices of different sizes, where
parasitic effects are more significant, such variations are not negligible and cannot be
ignored. Consequently, it is also essential to design the matching network and the impedance
inversion as an integrated unit, considering the overall device parasitic of the DPA.
[0012] The information disclosed in this background of the disclosure section is only for
enhancement of understanding of the general background of the invention and should not be
taken as an acknowledgement or any form of suggestion that this information forms the prior
art already known to a person skilled in the art.
6
SUMMARY
[0013] The present disclosure discloses a wideband Doherty Power Amplifier (DPA) circuit.
The wideband DPA circuit comprises a main PA, an auxiliary PA, and an input power splitter
configured to split input power into main PA and auxiliary PA. Further, the circuit comprises
a multi-phasing block component to provide phase difference between the main PA and the
auxiliary PA. Furthermore, the circuit comprises a parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter connected to the main PA to compensate a parasitic load on the main PA and
modulate load in the DPA. Also, the circuit comprises a parasitic canceller connected to the
auxiliary PA to compensate for the parasitic load on the auxiliary PA and avoid leakage of
current from the main PA to the auxiliary PA, when the auxiliary PA is in an ‘OFF’ state.
Additionally, the circuit comprises an output impedance transformer connected to the main
PA and the auxiliary PA.
[0014] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter is designed based on parasitic of one or more transistors connected to the main PA,
an impedance ZL provided by the output impedance transformer and a quasi-open circuit
impedance provided by the parasitic canceller, such that the parasitic compensator &
impedance inverter provides a required load modulation over a large variation in the input
power and wide bandwidth.
[0015] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter is configured with a plurality of sections, each section comprising a transmission line
and a shunt admittance. The number of sections in the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter is determined based on frequency of operation of the circuit, optimum load for
transistor and corresponding parasitic of the transistor.
[0016] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the parasitic canceller provides
cancellation of the parasitic load presented by an auxiliary transistor in the auxiliary PA based
on the parasitic load presented by the one or more transistors on the main PA. Also, the
parasitic canceller is configured with a plurality of sections, each section comprising a
transmission line and a shunt admittance. The number of sections in the parasitic canceller is
determined based on frequency of operation of the circuit, optimum load for transistor and
corresponding parasitic of the transistor.
7
[0017] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the transmission line on each of the
plurality of sections has a characteristic impedance corresponding to each of the plurality of
sections. Further, an admittance value of the shunt admittance is realized using at least one
inductor in the circuit, at least one capacitor in the circuit, a series combination of the at least
one inductor and the at least one capacitor or a shunt combination of the at least one inductor
and the at least one capacitor. The admittance value of the shunt admittance is realized using
a transmission line stub with a predefined characteristic impedance value.
[0018] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the multi-phasing block component is
configured with a combination of delay lines to provide multiple phase shifts corresponding
to different values of a frequency of operation to compensate a phase difference between the
main PA and the auxiliary PA.
[0019] In an embodiment of the present disclosure, operation of the auxiliary PA is triggered
when an output voltage of the main PA is more than a predefined peak voltage. An output
current generated during the operation of the auxiliary PA causes modulation of the load on
the main PA such that the load on the main PA reduces with increase in the input power. The
network parameters of the circuit are obtained simultaneously over the wide bandwidth,
while considering their effect on each other and the effect of load impedance ZL provided by
the output impedance transformer. Also, the circuit may be configured to modify the load to
the one or more transistors in the main PA over a wide input drive and wide bandwidth while
avoiding clipping and corresponding addition of nonlinearity in operation of the DPA.
[0020] The foregoing summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way
limiting. In addition to the illustrative aspects, embodiments, and features described above,
further aspects, embodiments, and features will become apparent by reference to the drawings
and the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
[0021] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this
disclosure, illustrate exemplary embodiments and, together with the description, explain the
disclosed principles. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the
figure in which the reference number first appears. The same numbers are used throughout
8
the figures to reference like features and components. Some embodiments of system and/or
methods in accordance with embodiments of the present subject matter are now described,
by way of example only, and regarding the accompanying figures, in which:
[0022] FIG. 1 [PRIOR ART] illustrates architecture of a conventional Doherty Power
Amplifier (DPA);
[0023] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary architecture of the proposed Doherty Power
Amplifier (DPA), in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure;
[0024] FIG. 3 illustrates a detailed architecture of the proposed DPA, in accordance with
various embodiments of the present disclosure;
[0025] FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary internal architecture of a parasitic compensator &
impedance inverter of the proposed DPA, in accordance with an embodiment of the present
disclosure;
[0026] FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary internal architecture of a parasitic canceller of the
proposed DPA, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0027] FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary architecture of an output impedance transformer of
the proposed DPA, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
[0028] FIG. 7A illustrates simulation of drain efficiency of the proposed DPA with
normalized input voltage drive, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;
and
[0029] FIG. 7B illustrates simulation of drain efficiency in the proposed DPA with
normalized frequency, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.
[0030] It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any block diagrams herein
represent conceptual views of illustrative systems embodying the principles of the present
subject matter. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts, flow diagrams, state
transition diagrams, pseudo code, and the like represent various processes which may be
9
substantially represented in computer readable medium and executed by a computer or
processor, whether such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0031] In the present document, the word "exemplary" is used herein to mean "serving as an
example, instance, or illustration." Any embodiment or implementation of the present subject
matter described herein as "exemplary" is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or
advantageous over other embodiments.
[0032] The present disclosure relates to a wideband Doherty Power Amplifier (DPA) with
device parasitic compensation and impedance inversion. In an embodiment, the proposed
wideband DPA performs wideband compensation for impedance inversion, matching of main
Power Amplifier (PA) and auxilary PA and parasitic cancellation for optimal operation of
the DPA. Consequently, the proposed wideband DPA aims to rectify one or more
imperfections such as, leakage of current from the main PA to the auxiliary PA when the
auxiliary PA is in an ‘OFF’ condition, providing optimum load impedance and so on. In other
words, in the proposed wideband DPA, the matching network and the impedance inversion
is integrated into a single unit, which facilitates: (1) proper impedance matching between the
main PA and the auxiliary PA; (2) proper load modulation and optimal load conditions for
both main PA and the auxiliary PA; and (3) reduced distortion and improved linearity of the
DPA. The structure and internal architecture of the proposed wideband DPA is explained in
detail with reference to Figures 2-7 in the following paragraphs.
[0033] In the following detailed description of the embodiments of the disclosure, reference
is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by
way of illustration specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. These
embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the
disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes
may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The following
description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
[0034] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary architecture of the proposed Doherty Power
Amplifier (DPA) 200, which may be used to provide a frequency agile power amplification.
10
In an embodiment, the DPA 200 may comprise, without limitation, an input power splitter
101, a multi-phasing block 201, a main Power Amplifier (PA) 103 path, an auxiliary PA 105
path and an output impedance transformer 207. In an embodiment, the main PA 103 may
further comprise, without limiting to, an input matching network 1 1091, a transistor 1 Q1
1101 and a parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203. The auxiliary PA 105 may
comprise, without limiting to, an input matching network 2 1092, a transistor 2 Q2 1102 and
a parasitic canceller 205.
[0035] In an embodiment, the input power splitter 101 may be used to divide an input power
across the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 and transmit the split input power to the
multi-phasing block 201. In an embodiment, the operation of the the auxiliary PA 105 may
be triggered only when an output voltage of the main PA 103 is more than a predefined peak
voltage.
[0036] In an embodiment, the multi-phasing block 201 may be configured to provide
multiple phase shifts to different values of the input power. The multi-phasing block 201 may
be comprised of a combination of multiple delay lines, which can provide a required phase
shift to the main PA 103, relative to the auxiliary PA 105. That is, the multi-phasing block
201 ensures that desired phase shifts are provided to different values of the input power.
Consequently, the multi-phasing block 201 compensates for the phase difference between
the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105, which primarily occurs due to the phase difference
between the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 and parasitic canceller 205, and
the input matching network 1 1091, and input matching network 2 1092. Additionally, the
multi-phasing block 201 may be also configured to compensate for the phase disparity
between the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105. In such a case, the input to the main PA
103 may be shifted by a factor of ‘ejϕ’, where the input to the auxiliary PA 105 will be shifted
by a relative 0o
phase. This difference between phases added to the main PA 103 and the
auxiliary PA 105 ensures appropriate load modulation in the proposed wideband DPA 200.
[0037] In an embodiment, the input matching network 1 1091 on the main PA 103 and the
input matching network 2 1092 on the auxiliary PA 105 may be configured to match the
inputs of the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105, respectively. In an embodiment, the
operation and functionality of the input matching network 1 1091 and the input matching
11
network 2 1092 may be same as the input matching networks on the conventional DPA 100,
discussed with reference to FIG. 1 of the present disclosure.
[0038] The transistor 1 Q1 1101 and the transistor 2 Q2 1102 represent the parasitic load on
the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 respectively. Both the transistor 1 Q1 1101 and
the transistor 2 Q2 1102 may be an electrical manifestation of physical geometry of the
transistors.
[0039] In an embodiment, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 helps in
achieving a frequency agile impedance inversion for the operation of the DPA 200 over the
wider bandwidth. In an implementation, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203
may be designed based on the parasitic load of the transistor 1 Q1 1101 connected to the main
PA 103, an impedance provided by the output impedance transformer 207 and a quasi-open
circuit impedance provided by the parasitic canceller 205, such that the parasitic compensator
& impedance inverter 203 provides a required load modulation over a large variation in the
input power for operation of the DPA 200 over a wider bandwidth. Further, the parasitic
compensator & impedance inverter 203 may be configured with a plurality of sections, and
each section of the plurality of sections may comprise a transmission line and a shunt
admittance. The detailed internal architecture of the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter 203 is explained with reference to FIG. 4 of the present disclosure.
[0040] In an embodiment, the parasitic canceller 205 may be configured to provide a
frequency agile parasitic cancellation for the DPA 200 while considering the effect of the
parasitic load of the transistor 2 Q2 1102 on the auxiliary PA 105. That is, the parasitic
canceller 205 ensures both parasitic cancellation and modulation of an overall load on the
DPA 200. In an implementation, the parasitic canceller 205 may be configured with a
plurality of sections. Each section of the plurality of sections may comprise, without
limitation, a transmission line and a shunt admittance. The detailed internal architecture of
the parasitic canceller 205 is explained with reference to FIG. 5 of the present disclosure.
[0041] In an embodiment, the output impedance transformer 207 may be configured to
provide an output impedance transformation of the load passing through a junction ‘J’ of the
DPA 200, where the main PA 103 and the auxiliary PA 105 are connected. The detailed
12
internal architecture of the impedance transformer 207 is explained with reference to FIG. 6
of the present disclosure.
[0042] FIG. 3 illustrates a detailed architecture of the proposed DPA 200, in accordance with
various embodiments of the present disclosure.
[0043] In an embodiment, FIG. 3 shows an equivalent circuit diagram of architecture of the
proposed DPA 200, which is shown in FIG. 2. Particularly, in FIG. 3, the transistor Q1 1101
and transistor Q2 1102 are represented with their simplified equivalent circuits showing the
parasitic load P1 301 and parasitic load P2 303, respectively.
[0044] In an emboidment, during operation of the DPA 200 at a low power level, the
auxiliary PA 105 is maintained at an ‘OFF’ condition since the transistor Q2 1102 is biased
below its pinch-off value. Alternatively, the transistor Q1 1101 in the main PA 103 is biased
at the pinch-off or above the pinch-off value. Therefore, the main PA 103 starts operating
even at the low power level, when the auxiliary PA 105 is in the ‘OFF’ condition. In such a
case, the main PA 103 is terminated to a load, which is higher than its optimum value, thereby
reaching a maximum voltage (i.e., voltage saturation) even at the low output current. In an
embodiment, this required load may be provided by the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter 203, which is terminated with the parasitic canceller 205 and the output impedance
transformer 207. Therefore, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 is designed
with a prior knowledge of the parasitic load P1 301 and parasitic load P2 303, while
considering an impedance value ZL presented at the junction J and the parasitic canceller 205.
The impedance value ZL may be provided by the output impedance transformer 207. As an
example, the impedance value ZL may be 50 Ω, as shown in FIG. 3.
[0045] In an embodiment, when the input power is at a certain back-off value, when the
ouput voltage of the main PA 103 reaches to its peak value, the auxiliary PA 105 starts
operating and gradually contributes to the output current. This output current will modify the
load presented to the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203, which eventually
ensures that the the load seen by the main PA 103 gradually reduces, as the input power drive
increases. Therefore, the load seen by the main PA 103 reduces, whereas, the output current
of the main PA 103 still increases. This ensures that the output voltage of the main PA 103
is maintained at its peak value from back-off phase to its saturation. Since the main PA 103
13
operates at voltage stauration (i.e., output voltage maintained at its peak value) even at the
back-off power, it exhibits high efficiency operation.
[0046] In operation, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203, along with the
parasitic load P1 301 of the transistor Q1 1101 of the main PA 103, ensures transformation
of the transistor Q1 1101 as a constant-voltage source at junction ‘J’. In an embodiment, the
parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 may utilize the parasitic load P1 301 to
achieve the desired output matching and impedance inversion to achieve the required
frequency agile impedance inversion, and thereby extend the operation of the DPA 200 over
the wide bandwidth. The network parameters of the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter 203 may be obtained while considering the parasitic load P1 301, parasitic load P2
303, the impedance ZL presented at junction ‘J’. Therefore, in an implementation, the
parasitic load P1 301, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203, the parasitic
canceller 205, the parasitic load P2 303 and the impedance ZL may be considered as a threeport network, where the impedance ZL is terminating the third port. In other words, the
impedance ZL may be realized by the output impedance transformer 207 when it is terminated
by 50Ω. Since the network parameters of the parasitic load P1 301 and the parasitic load P2
303 are known from the configuration of the transistor Q1 1101 and transistor Q2 1102
respectively, network parameters of the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 and
the parasitic canceller 205, along with the impedance ZL, may be obtained by enforcing the
optimum load conditions at the back-off and saturation power values.
[0047] In an embodiment, the optimum load condition may be determined based on standard
operation of the DPA 200, where, at saturation, the optimum load is Ropt and is obtained from
the Current-Voltage (I/V) characteristics of the transistors. Thus, at back-off power, the main
PA 103 should see the load Ropt/β, where ‘β’ is a back-off factor. The back-off factor may be
related to the average input power drive (back-off from saturation), where the efficiency
needs to be improved in the operation of a typical DPA. For example, a 6dB back-off may
correspond to β = 0.5, which results in 2 Ropt load, which in turn terminates the main PA 103
at back-off power. However, due to the nonlinear current profile of the transistor Q2 1102
with the input power, the load modulation presented by it results in a higher load seen by the
main PA 103. This eventually exceeds the voltage swing over the maximum voltage rating
of the transistor Q1 1101, which eventually results in voltage clipping and increased
nonlinearity. Therefore, the network parameter of the parasitic compensator & impedance
14
inverter 203 are obtained by considering the load presented to the main PA 103, less than
Ropt/β at back-off. The network parameters of the parasitic compensator & impedance
inverter 203 and the parasitic canceller 205 can be represented as Y, Z, ABCD or Sparameters. Once the network parameters of the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter
203 and parasitic canceller 205 are obtained, the network may be synthesized using the circuit
topology.
[0048] In an embodiment, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 provides a
frequency agile parasitic compensation and has the capability of wideband operation, because
of its unique architecture, which is explained with reference to FIG. 4.
[0049] In an embodiment, the parasitic canceller 205, along with the parasitic load P2 303 of
the auxiliary PA 105, ensures a constant current source at junction ‘J’, irrespective of the
presence of the transistor device parasitic. The parasitic canceller 205 may also provide an
output matching to the transistor Q2 1102 to perform optimally. The parasitic canceller 205
is designed with a prior knowledge of the parasitic loads P1 301 of the transistors Q1 1101,
and parasitic load P2 303 associated with the transistor Q2 1102. The network parameters of
the parasitic canceller 205 may be obtained while considering the parasitic load P1 301 and
parasitic load P2 303, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203, and the
impedance ZL presented at the junction ‘J’ due to the output impedance transformer 207. The
network parameters of the parasitic canceller 205 may be represented by S, Y, Z and ABCD
parameters. These parameters may be obtained along with the network parameters of the
parasitic compensator & impedance invertor, as described above. In summary, the network
parameters of the whole circuit of the DPA 200 may be obtained simultaneously over the
wide bandwidth, while considering their effect on each other and the effect of the impedance
ZL provided by the output impedance transformer 207. In an embodiment, the logic of
obtaining the network parameters of the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 and
the parasitic canceller 205 with a prior knowledge of the parasitic load P1 301 and parasitic
load P2 303, as described above, helps in solving the following two problems of the
conventional DPA 100:
1. The matching networks can guarantee the Ropt application since the load at junction ‘J’
changes dynamically with the input power drive due to the load modulation.
2. The slight leakage of the current from the main PA 103 to the auxiliary PA 105 may
15
be minimized due to quasi-open circuit condition achieved by the parastic canceller,
when the auxiliary PA 105 is in the ‘OFF’ condition at the low power operation. This
is possible by designing the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter 203 in
presence of the quasi-open circuit condition provided by the parastic canceller at
junction J. This, in turn, enables the application of the appropriate loads to the
transistors and thereby avoids clipping and enables linearity in the operation of the
DPA 200.
[0050] In an embodiment, the parasitic canceller 205 ensures that there is no current leakage
from the main PA 103 to the auxiliary PA 105 at the back-off power (i.e., when the Auxiliary
PA 105 is OFF). Consequently, the parasitic canceller 205 ensures a frequency agile parasitic
compensation of the transistor Q2 1102 on the auxiliary PA 105. Also, the parasitic canceller
205 has the capability of wide band operation.
[0051] FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary internal architecture of a parasitic compensator &
impedance inverter 203 of the proposed DPA 200, in accordance with an embodiment of the
present disclosure. In an implementation, the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter
203 may have a plurality of sections, each section comprising of, without limiting to, a
transmission line 401 and a shunt admittance YM1, YM2, …, YMn, as shown in FIG. 4. In an
embodiment, the number of sections ‘n’ in the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter
203 and values of the components in each section may differ based on the frequency of
operation, the optimum loads for different devices and different values of the corresponding
parasitic loads. The transmission lines 401 may have a characteristic impedance value of ZM1,
ZM2, ZM3, …, ZMn corresponding to ‘n’ different sections. Similarly, the electrical length of
the transmission lines 401 may be represented as θM1, θM2, θM3, …, θMn corresponding to ‘n’
different sections. In an embodiment, the electrical lengths may independently take any
values ranging from 0o
to 360o
for different values of the operating frequency. The
characteristic impedances ZM1, ZM2, ZM3, …, ZMn may also independently vary to any value
from 10Ω to 300Ω.
[0052] In an embodiment, the shunt admittance YM1, YM2, YM3, …, YMn corresponding to the
‘n’ different sections can have a ‘zero’ admittance value in some scenario. Alternatively, the
values of the shunt admittances may be realized using an inductor, a capacitor or their series
and shunt combinations in the circuit. The shunt admittance can also be realized using a
16
transmission line stub, with a characteristic impedance that can take any value from 10Ω to
300Ω and electrical length that can take any value from 0o
to 360o
for different values of the
operating frequency.
[0053] FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary internal architecture of a parasitic canceller 205 of
the proposed DPA 200, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In an
implementation, the parasitic canceller 205 may have a plurality of sections, each section
comprising of, without limiting to, a transmission line 501 and a shunt admittance YA1, YA2,
…, YAm, as shown in FIG. 5. In an embodiment, the number of sections ‘m’ in the parasitic
canceller 205 and values of the components in each section may differ based on the frequency
of operation, the optimum loads for different devices and different values of the
corresponding parasitic loads. The transmission lines 501 may have a characteristic
impedance value of ZA1, ZA2, ZA3, …, ZAm corresponding to ‘m’ different sections. Similarly,
the electrical length of the transmission lines 501 may be represented as θA1, θA2, θA3, …, θAm
corresponding to ‘m’ different sections. In an embodiment, the electrical lengths may
independently take any values ranging from 0o
to 360o
for different values of the operating
frequency. The characteristic impedances ZA1, ZA2, ZA3, …, ZAm may also independently vary
to any value from 10Ω to 300Ω.
[0054] In an embodiment, the shunt admittance YA1, YA2, YA3, …, YAm corresponding to the
‘m’ different sections can have a ‘zero’ admittance value in some scenario. Alternatively, the
values of the shunt admittances may be realized using an inductor, a capacitor or their series
and shunt combinations in the circuit. The shunt admittance can also be realized using a
transmission line stub, with a characteristic impedance that can take any value from 10Ω to
300Ω and electrical length that can take any value from 0o
to 360o
for different values of the
operating frequency.
[0055] FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary architecture of an output impedance transformer 207
of the proposed DPA 200, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In an
embodiment, the output impedance transformer 207 provides output impedance
transformation for the DPA 200. The output impedance transformer 207 may comprise,
without limiting to, a plurality of sections of transmission line 601 and a shunt admittance,
as shown in FIG. 6. The characteristic impedances of the transmission lines 601 are
represented by ZJ,1, ZJ,2, ZJ,3, …ZJ,k. The electrical length of the transmission lines 601 are
17
represented by θ J,1, θ J,2, θ J,3, … θ J,k. The characteristic impedances ZJ,1, ZJ,2, ZJ,3, …ZJ,k may
take values from 10Ω to 300Ω. The electrical length θ J,1, θ J,2, θ J,3, … θ J,k may take values
from 0o
to 360o
at a particular frequency of operation. Similarly, shunt admittances YJS,1,
YJS,2, YJS,3, … YJS,k may have ‘zero’ admittance value in some scenario. Alternatively, the
shunt admittances may be of a definite, non-zero value, which will be realized using
inductors, capacitors or their series and shunt combinations in the circuit.
[0056] FIG. 7A illustrates the outcome of simulation of drain efficiency of the proposed
DPA 200 with a normalized input voltage drive in accordance with embodiments of the
present disclosure. In embodiment, the results in FIG. 7 indicate that the value of drain
efficiency peaks for 6 dB and 10 dB of power back-off values, corresponding to the
normalized input voltage (Vin) of 0.5V and 0.2V respectively.
[0057] FIG. 7B illustrates the outcome of simulation of drain efficiency in the proposed DPA
200 architecture with normalized frequency, in accordance with embodiments of the present
disclosure. FIG. 7B particularly indicates the drain efficiency at an average power value of
6dB back-off from the saturation value, with respect to the normalized frequency. It is evident
that the efficiency remains at 10% of its maximum value over a fractional bandwidth of 51%.
This means that the proposed DPA 200 shows a significant improvement over the
conventional DPA 100, which has a fractional bandwidth of typically 15% in practice.
[0058] Advantages of the embodiments of the present disclosure are illustrated herein.
[0059] In an embodiment, the proposed DPA is configured to support a wideband
performance with the use of a frequency agile parasitic compensator & impedance inverter.
[0060] In an embodiment, the proposed DPA is configured to provide an optimal
performance over a wide bandwidth, while accommodating significant variations in input
power drive and ensuring operational efficiency. Since the matching network and the
parasitic compensator & impedance invertor are designed together as one unit, i.e., frequency
agile parasitic compensator & impedance inverter, any changes in the load at a junction ‘J’,
due to the load modulation, will not affect the required optimum load impedance Ropt of the
circuit.
18
[0061] In an embodiment, the proposed architecture enhances overall efficiency and
performance of the DPA even when the DPA is operating at reduced power levels or in backoff scenarios. The proposed architecture for DPA also ensures that the amplifier remains
effective across a wideband frequency operation, contributing to its flexibility and reliability
in practical applications.
[0062] In an embodiment, the proposed architecture helps in avoiding clipping and ensures
linearity in the operation of the DPA. The DPA will maintain a stable and linear performance
even when faced with varying input signals and a wide frequency spectrum. In other words,
the proposed architecture improves the bandwidth and linearity metric of the DPA.
[0063] In an embodiment, the proposed architecture helps to bridge the gap between
theoretical expectations and real-world implementation of the DPAs and ensures that the
performance of the DPA closely aligns with simulation results. This is possible since the
parastic canceller is designed considering the effect of frequency agile impedance inverter
and the impedance ZL provided by the output impedance transformer.
[0064] In an embodiment, the proposed architecture improves the overall effectiveness of
the power amplification systems with the use of the parasitic canceller.
[0065] In an embodiment, the proposed architecture helps in maintaining signal integrity and
fidelity, making it suitable for applications where precise and undistorted signal amplification
is crucial.
[0066] In an embodiment, the proposed DPA supports wideband operation modes on the
power amplifier to achieve wide bandwidth extending to the octave range. The proposed
DPA supports applying modified load modulation, which provides nonlinearity
compensation for achieving good linearity at average power. As a result, the proposed DPA
helps in mitigating the frequency dependence effects of the parasitic loads on the required
load modulation, thereby enabling the wider frequency response.
[0067] In light of the technical advancements provided by the disclosed DPA architecture,
the claimed architecture, as discussed above, is not routine, conventional, or well-known
aspect in the art, as the claimed architecture provides the aforesaid solutions to the technical
problems existing in the conventional PA architectures. Further, the claimed architecture
19
clearly brings an improvement in the functioning of the DPA itself, as the claimed
architecture provides a technical solution to a technical problem.
[0068] While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and
embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments
disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the
true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
WE CLAIM:
1. A wideband Doherty Power Amplifier (DPA) (200) circuit, the circuit comprising:
a main PA (103) and an auxiliary PA (105);
an input power splitter (101) configured to split an input power into the main
PA (103) and the auxiliary PA (105);
a multi-phasing block (201) component to provide a phase difference between
the main PA (103) and the auxiliary PA (105);
a parasitic compensator & impedance inverter (203) connected to the main
PA (103) to compensate a parasitic load P1 (301) on the main PA (103) and modulate
an overall load on the DPA (200);
a parasitic canceller (205) connected to the auxiliary PA (105) to compensate
the parasitic load P2 (303) on the auxiliary PA (105) and avoid leakage of current
from the main PA (103) to the auxiliary PA (105), when the auxiliary PA (105) is in
an ‘OFF’ state; and
an output impedance transformer (207) connected to the main PA (103) and
the auxiliary PA (105).
2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter (203)
is designed based on parasitic load P1 (301) of transistor Q1 (1101) connected to the
main PA (103), an impedance ZL provided by the output impedance transformer
(207) and a quasi-open circuit impedance provided by the parasitic canceller (205),
such that the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter (203) provides a required
load modulation over a large variation in the input power and wide bandwidth, and
wherein the parasitic compensator & impedance inverter (203) is configured
with a plurality of sections, each section comprising a transmission line and a shunt
admittance.
3. The circuit of claim 2, wherein number of sections in the parasitic compensator &
impedance inverter (203) is determined based on frequency of operation of the circuit,
22
optimum load for the transistor (1101) and corresponding parasitic of the transistor
(1101).
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the parasitic canceller (205) provides cancellation of
the parasitic load P2 (303) presented by a transistor Q2 (1102) in the auxiliary PA
(105) based on the parasitic load P1 (301) presented by the transistor Q1 (1101) on
the main PA (103), and wherein the parasitic canceller (205) is configured with a
plurality of sections, each section comprising a transmission line and a shunt
admittance.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein number of sections in the parasitic canceller (205) is
determined based on frequency of operation of the circuit, optimum load for the
transistor (1102) and corresponding parasitic loads P1 (301), P2 (303) of the
transistors Q1 (1101), Q2 (1102), respectively.
6. The method of claims 2 and 4, wherein the transmission line on each of the plurality
of sections has a characteristic impedance corresponding to each of the plurality of
sections.
7. The circuit of claims 2 and 4, wherein an admittance value of the shunt admittance is
realized using at least one inductor in the circuit, at least one capacitor in the circuit,
a series combination of the at least one inductor and the at least one capacitor or a
shunt combination of the at least one inductor and the at least one capacitor.
8. The circuit of claims 2 and 4, wherein the admittance value of the shunt admittance
is realized using a transmission line stub with a predefined characteristic impedance
value.
9. The circuit of claim 1, wherein network parameters of the circuit are obtained
simultaneously over the wide bandwidth, while considering their effect on each other
and the effect of load impedance ZL provided by the output impedance transformer
(207).
10. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the circuit is configured to modify the load to the
transistor (1101) in the main PA (103) over a wide input drive and wide bandwidth
while avoiding clipping and corresponding addition of non-linearity in operation of
the DPA (200).
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 202341082863-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 2 | 202341082863-PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 3 | 202341082863-POWER OF AUTHORITY [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 4 | 202341082863-FORM 1 [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 5 | 202341082863-DRAWINGS [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 6 | 202341082863-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [05-12-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-12-05 |
| 7 | 202341082863-Request Letter-Correspondence [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 8 | 202341082863-Power of Attorney [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 9 | 202341082863-FORM 18 [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 10 | 202341082863-Form 1 (Submitted on date of filing) [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 11 | 202341082863-DRAWING [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 12 | 202341082863-Covering Letter [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 13 | 202341082863-CORRESPONDENCE-OTHERS [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 14 | 202341082863-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [29-03-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-03-29 |
| 15 | 202341082863-Proof of Right [03-06-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-06-03 |
| 16 | 202341082863-FORM 3 [05-06-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-06-05 |