Description:storage at 0 ± 2°C for 7 days.
The “accelerated storage” is the sample after subjecting the sample to accelerated storage tests at 54±2°C for 14 days.
The insecticidal formulation composition of examples 1 - 2 were found stable during accelerated stability study at 54±2° C for 14 daysand low temperature at 0 ± 2°C for 7 days.Example 3 was found stable during accelerated stability study at 54±2° C for 14 days.
Example 3: Evaluation of Bio-efficacy of insecticidal Composition and thereof (Etofenprox + Diafenthiuron + Spiromesifen) against whitefly on Cotton crop.

Table 2: Effect of different treatments on population of whitefly in cotton crop.
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of whitefly per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS % Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS % Control
10 DAS Colby Value 10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 7.55
(2.92) 8.60
(3.09) 40.07 9.36
(3.21) 11.17
(3.48) 43.15
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 6.67
(2.76) 4.75
(2.39) 66.91 6.47
(2.73) 7.94
(2.98) 59.83
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 6.76
(2.82) 5.87
(2.61) 59.10 6.85
(2.79) 9.70
(3.26) 50.94
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 +600 +625 2.7
(2.78) 2.77
(1.62) 88.61 1.008 2.00
(1.72) 2.10
(1.76) 89.38 1.017
5 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 30 + 174 + 60 600 3.40
(1.92) 3.17
(1.95) 80.25 0.913 2.73
(1.93) 3.00
(1.99) 84.82 0.965
6 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 35 + 203 + 70 700 2.93
(2.03) 2.03
(1.73) 85.82 0.977 2.27
(1.80) 2.60
(1.89) 86.85 0.988
7 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 40 + 232 + 80 800 2.73
(1.99) 2.00
(1.73) 86.06 0.979 2.20
(1.78) 2.50
(1.87) 87.35 0.994
8 Untreated Check - - 11.67
(2.04) 14.34
(3.91) 16.46
(4.17) 19.77
(4.55)
CD at 5% 0.226 0.218 0.210 0.196
SE (m) 0.074 0.071 0.068 0.064
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value
Results :
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% @ 40 + 232 + 80 gm a.i./ha and @ 35 + 203 +70 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent whitefly per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 89.38 %, 87.35 % and 86.85% reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (43.15%),Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (59.83%) and Spiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (50.94%) against whitefly in cotton at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./hashowed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.017 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 2)

Table 3: Effect of different treatments on population of whitefly in cotton crop.
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of whitefly per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS % Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS % Control
10 DAS Colby Value 10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 8.45
(3.06) 8.63
(3.10) 42.50 9.08
(3.17) 11.23
(3.49) 44.84
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 6.40
(2.71) 4.79
(2.40) 68.09 6.47
(2.73) 8.79
(3.12) 56.82
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 6.76
(2.78) 6.15
(2.67) 59.03 6.87
(2.80) 9.41
(3.22) 53.80
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 + 600 + 625 2.8
(1.95) 1.87
(1.69) 87.56 1.007 2.90
(1.75) 2.07
(1.75) 89.85 1.010
5 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 45 + 198 + 84 600 3.23
(2.05) 2.17
(1.77) 85.57 0.984 3.03
(1.86) 2.77
(1.94) 86.42 0.971
6 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 52.50 + 231 + 98 700 2.86
(1.96) 1.80
(1.66) 88.01 1.012 2.60
(1.72) 2.13
(1.76) 89.53 1.006
7 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 60 + 264 + 112 800 2.87
(1.96) 1.70
(1.64) 88.67 1.020 2.25
(1.67) 1.97
(1.72) 90.34 1.015
8 Untreated Check - - 12.34
(3.65) 15.01
(4.00) 18.13
(4.37) 20.37
(4.62)
CD at 5% 0.173 0.198 0.197 0.163
SE (m) 0.056 0.065 0.064 0.053
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value
Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC @ 75 + 300 + 150 gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 60 + 264 + 112 gm a.i./ha and @ 52.50 + 231 +98 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent whitefly per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 89.85 %, 90.34 % and 89.53% reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (44.84%),Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (56.82%) and Spiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (53.80%) against whitefly in cotton at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./hashowed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.010,1.015, and 1.006 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 3)

Table 4: Effect of different treatments on population of whitefly in cotton crop.
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of whitefly per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS % Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS % Control
10 DAS Colby Value
10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 8.23
(3.03) 8.98
(3.15) 37.39 9.10
(3.17) 11.50
(3.53) 45.41
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 6.63
(2.75) 5.25
(2.50) 63.37 6.47
(2.73) 8.79
(3.12) 58.26
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 6.76
(2.78) 6.15
(2.67) 57.12 6.87
(2.80) 9.66
(3.26) 54.16
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 + 600 + 625 4.5
(2.33) 1.63
(1.61) 88.61 1.006 1.97
(1.71) 2.03
(1.73) 90.35 1.009
5 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 51 + 222 + 108 600 4.76
(2.39) 2.13
(1.76) 85.13 0.967 2.23
(1.79) 2.77
(1.93) 86.87 0.970
6 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 59.50 +259+126 700 2.90
(1.79) 1.60
(1.60) 88.84 1.009 2.00
(1.72) 1.80
(1.66) 91.46 1.021
7 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 68 + 296 + 144 800 2.56
(1.88) 1.43
(1.55) 90.01 1.022 1.90
(1.70) 1.60
(1.60) 92.41 1.032
8 Untreated Check - - 11.34
(3.51) 14.34
(3.91) 17.80
(4.33) 21.07
(4.69)
CD at 5% - - 0.243 0.210 0.237 0.214
SE (m) - - 0.079 0.069 0.077 0.070
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value

Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC @ 75 + 300 + 150 gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC @ 68 + 296 + 144 gm a.i./ha and @ 59.50 + 259 +126 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent whitefly per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 90.35 %, 92.41 % and 91.46% reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (45.41%),Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (58.26%) and Spiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (54.16%) against whitefly in cotton at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./hashowed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.009, 1.032, and 1.021 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 4)
Conclusion
After evaluation of three formulations i.e., Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC, Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC and Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC at three different doses (600 ml/ ha, 700 ml/ha & 800 ml/ha)., Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 700ml/ha. found to be effective against whitefly in cotton crop in comparison to tank mix formulation Tank mix formulation (Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC) as well as solo treatments (Etofenprox 10% EC, Diafenthiuron 50% WP and Spiromesifen 22.90% SC) Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 700ml/ha. was found at par with higher formulation, higher dose and higher active ingredient.

Example 4: Evaluation of Bio-efficacy of insecticidal Composition and thereof (Etofenprox + Diafenthiuron + Spiromesifen) against Jassids on Brinjal crop.
Table 5: Effect of different treatments on population of Jassids in Brinjal crop
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of Jassids per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS % Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS % Control
10 DAS Colby Value 10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 5.27
(2.50) 5.93
(2.63) 55.05 6.90
(2.81) 7.23
(2.86) 58.67
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 4.50
(2.34) 5.43
(2.53) 58.84 5.77
(2.60) 6.20
(2.68) 64.57
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 4.97
(2.43) 6.37
(2.71) 51.77 6.67
(2.76) 7.07
(2.84) 59.62
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 +600 +625 2.87
(1.96) 1.4
(1.55) 89.14 1.003 2.27
(1.80) 1.83
(1.68) 89.52 1.007
5 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 30 + 174 + 60 600 3.40
(2.09) 2.30
(1.81) 82.58 0.929 2.53
(1.87) 2.63
(1.90) 84.95 0.956
6 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 35 + 203 + 70 700 3.20
(2.04) 2.00
(1.72) 84.85 0.955 1.90
(1.70) 2.37
(1.83) 86.48 0.973
7 Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC 40 + 232 + 80 800 3.03
(2.00) 1.87
(1.69) 85.86 0.966 1.70
(1.64) 2.13
(1.76) 87.81 0.988
8 Untreated Check - - 10.40
(3.37) 13.20
(3.76) 15.00
(3.99) 17.50
(4.30)
CD at 5% 0.219 0.227 0.145 0.197
SE (m) 0.007 0.074 0.047 0.064
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value

Results
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% @ 40 + 232 + 80 gm a.i./ha and @ 35 + 203 +70 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent Jassids per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 89.52%, 87.81% and 86.48% reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (58.67.15%),Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (64.57%) andSpiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (59.62%) against Jassids in Brinjal at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./hashowed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.007 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 5)

Table 6: Effect of different treatments on population of Jassids in Brinjal crop.
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of Jassids per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS %
Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS %
Control
10 DAS Colby Value 10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 5.60
(2.56) 6.07
(2.65) 55.17 6.13
(2.67) 7.43
(2.90) 57.36
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 4.97
(2.43) 5.30
(2.51) 60.84 5.30
(2.50) 6.87
(2.80) 60.61
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 5.30
(2.51) 5.83
(2.61) 56.90 6.23
(2.68) 7.73
(2.95) 55.64
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 + 600 + 625 3.37
(2.08) 1.5
(1.56) 89.16 1.002 2.00
(1.72) 1.83
(1.68) 89.48 1.005
5 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 45 + 198 + 84 600 3.47
(2.11) 2.07
(1.75) 84.73 0.952 2.33
(1.82) 2.40
(1.84) 86.23 0.969
6 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 52.50 + 231 + 98 700 2.40
(1.82) 1.67
(1.63) 87.68 0.985 2.03
(1.73) 1.77
(1.66) 89.87 1.010
7 Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC 60 + 264 + 112 800 2.23
(1.97) 1.60
(1.61) 88.18 0.991 1.80
(1.67) 1.60
(1.60) 90.82 1.021
8 Untreated Check - - 11.73
(3.56) 13.53
(3.81) 15.17
(4.02) 17.43
(4.29)
CD at 5% 0.281 0.171 0.207 0.139
SE (m) 0.092 0.056 0.068 0.045
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value

Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC @ 75 + 300 + 150 gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 60 + 264 + 112 gm a.i./ha and @ 52.50 + 231 +98 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent Jassids per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 89.48 %, 90.82 % and 89.87 % reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (57.36%), Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (60.61 %) and Spiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (55.64 %) against Jassids in Brinjal at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC @ 75 + 300 + 150 gm a.i./ha showed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.016,1.012, and 1.005 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 6)

Table 7: Effect of different treatments on population of Jassids in Brinjal crop.
Sr. No.
Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha Average no. of Jassids per leaf
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 3 DAS 5 DAS %
Control
5 DAS Colby Value 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS %
Control
10 DAS Colby Value 10 DAS
1 Etofenprox 10% EC 75 750 5.27
(2.50) 5.97
(2.63) 56.87 6.17
(2.67) 7.53
(2.92) 56.79
2 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 300 600 4.90
(2.42) 5.40
(2.52) 60.96 5.53
(2.55) 6.53
(2.74) 62.52
3 Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 150 625 5.30
(2.51) 5.83
(2.61) 57.83 6.00
(2.64) 7.40
(2.89) 57.55
4 Etofenprox 10% EC +Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC 75 + 300 + 150 750 + 600 + 625 3.37
(2.08) 1.4
(1.53) 90.12 1.006 1.90
(1.70) 1.80
(1.67) 89.67 1.001
5 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 51 + 222 + 108 600 3.90
(2.21) 2.60
(1.89) 81.20 0.907 2.50
(1.87) 2.30
(1.81) 86.81 0.969
6 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 59.50 +259+126 700 3.07
(2.01) 1.43
(1.55) 89.64 1.001 1.93
(1.71) 1.77
(1.66) 89.87 1.003
7 Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC 68 + 296 + 144 800 2.80
(1.94) 1.40
(1.54) 89.88 1.004 1.60
(1.61) 1.50
(1.58) 91.40 1.021
8 Untreated Check - - 10.73
(3.42) 13.83
(3.85) 15.70
(4.08) 17.43
(4.29)
CD at 5% - - 0.158 0.192 0.178 0.147
SE (m) - - 0.052 0.063 0.058 0.048
Figure in parenthesis represents square root transformed value

Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC @ 75 + 300 + 150 gm a.i./ha and Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC @ 68 + 296 + 144 gm a.i./ha and @ 59.50 + 259 +126 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent Jassids per leaf at 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 89.67 %, 91.40 % and 89.87% reduction over control at 10th DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% showed better result compared to individual application of Etofenprox 10% EC @ 75 gm a.i./ha (56.79%),Diafenthiuron 50% @ 300 gm a.i /ha (62.52%) and Spiromesifen 22.90% @ 150 gm a.i /ha (57.55%) against Jassids in Brinjal at 10 DAT. The application of Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC@ 75 + 300 + 150gm a.i./hashowed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.001, 1.021, and 1.003 (>1) at 10 DAT (Table 7)
Conclusion
After evaluation of three formulations i.e., Etofenprox 5% + Diafenthiuron 29% + Spiromesifen 10% SC, Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC and Etofenprox 8.5% + Diafenthiuron 37% + Spiromesifen 18% SC at three different doses (600 ml/ ha, 700 ml/ha & 800 ml/ha)., Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 700ml/ha. found to be effective against Jassids in Brinjal crop in comparison to tank mix formulation Tank mix formulation (Etofenprox 10% EC + Diafenthiuron 50% WP + Spiromesifen 22.90% SC) as well as solo treatments (Etofenprox 10% EC, Diafenthiuron 50% WP and Spiromesifen 22.90% SC) Etofenprox 7.5% + Diafenthiuron 33% + Spiromesifen 14% SC @ 700ml/ha. was found at par with higher formulation, higher dose and higher active ingredient.
, Claims:
1. An insecticidal composition comprising a synergistic combination of-
a. an Etofenprox in an amount ranging from 0.1% to 30.0% by weight;
b. a Diafenthiuron is present in an amount ranging from 0.1% to 50.0% by weight;
c. an Spiromesifen is present in an amount ranging from 0.1% to 30.0% by weight; and
d. agrochemical acceptable excipient.

2. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein Etofenprox is present in an amount of 7.5% w/w, Diafenthiuron is present in an amount of 33% w/w and Spiromesifen is present in an amount of 14% w/w.

3. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1 wherein, the agrochemically acceptable excipient is Emulsifier, Dispersing agent, AntifreezingAgent, Antifoaming agent, Rheology modifier, pH stabilizer, Solvent and Biocide.

4. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is selected from a suspension concentrate (SC), flowable suspension for seed treatment (FS), oil dispersion (OD), suspo-emulsion (SE), water-dispersible granule (WDG), or wettable powder (WP).

5. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the emulsifier is in an amount ranging from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight, selected from selected from but not limited to ethoxylated propoxylated alcohols, alkylphenolethoxylates, alkoxylatedtristyrylphenols, calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, Polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer, ethoxylatedpropoxylatedpolyaryl phenol, ethoxylated fatty acids, fatty alcohol ethoxylates, ethoxylatedricinoleic acid triglycerides, sorbitan trioleate, tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, castor oil ethoxylate, alkoxylated phosphate ester.

6. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the dispersing agent is in an amount ranging from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight, selected from selected from but not limited to polymeric ester dispersants, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate esters, or sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, acrylic copolymer,nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, polycarboxylates, calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, sodium lignosulphonate, polystyrenatedacrylated co-polymer, modified styrene acrylic copolymer, salts of phenol sulfonic acids, butyl polyalkylene oxide block co-polymer, mixture of tristyrylphenolethoxylates and polyalkylene oxide derivative of a synthetic alcohol,random co-polymer of alcoxylated polyethylene glycol.

7. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the antifoaming agent is in an amount ranging from 0.01% to 5.0% by weight, selected from selected from but not limited to polydimethylsiloxane or polydimethyl siloxane emulsion.

8. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rheology modifier is in an amount ranging from 0.01% to 20.0% by weight, selected from precipitated silica, fumed silica, modified fumed silica, bentonite clay, Rhodopol 23, hydroxymethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, thickening silica, hydrated clay minerals, magnesium aluminium silicates, organic derivative of hectorite clay, hydrophobic fumed silica, polyvinylpyrrolidone.

9. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the solvent component in an amount ranging up to 95.0% of the composition by weight, selected from selected from but not limited to demineralized water or oil media, wherein, oil medium selected from the group comprising, esterified fatty acids selected from methylethyl ester ofvegetable oil triglycerides containing C12–C22 saturated and unsaturated fatty acid.

10. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the biocide is in an amount ranging up to3.0% by weight, selected from but not limited to 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one or formaldehyde-based solutions or dipropylene glycol solution of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one.

11. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the antifreezing agent is in an amount ranging up to 15% by weight, selected from but not limited to ethylene glycol or propane-1,2-diol or propane-1,2,3-triol, urea.

12. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the stabilizing agent is in an amount ranging up to 5% by weight, selected from but not limited to epoxidized soyabean oil, butylated hydroxy toluene, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.

13. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the pH stablilizers is in an amount ranging up to 5% by weight, selected from but not limited to sodium pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, sodium oxalate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, trisodium phosphate, citric acid, trisodium citrate, monoethanol amine, triethanol amine, triethylamine, dibasic esters selected from dimethyl succinate, dimethyl glutarate, dimethyl adipate, ortho phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, hydrochloric acid.

14. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent is an amount 0.1% to 5.0% by weight is a blend of methylated seed oil-organic silicone compound may be selected from methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified trisiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified polydimethylsiloxane, methylated seed oil-20 trisiloxane ethoxylate, Polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane methylated seed oil-polyoxyethylene methyl polysiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyether polymethyl siloxane copolymer, methylated seed oil-polyether modified polysiloxane.

15. A process for preparing a Suspo-emulsion insecticidal composition comprising the steps of-
a. mixing Etofenprox with polyalkoxylated butyl ether and ethoxylated tristyrylphenol to create the Etofenprox oil phase.
b. adding dipropylene glycol solution of 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, polydimethylsiloxane emulsion, propane-1,2,3-triol, a nonionic surfactant blend, and acrylic copolymer to demineralized water in a pre-mixing vessel with a homogenizer.
c. homogenizing the mixture until uniform.
d. introducing Spiromesifen and Diafenthiuron, and mixing to obtain a slurry.
e. reducing the particle size of the slurry using a jacketed bead mill to achieve d(90) less than 20 microns.
f. collecting the aqueous phase into a mixing vessel.
g. adding the Etofenprox oil phase to the aqueous phase under continuous agitation.
h. incorporating a pH adjuster, stabilizer, and Rhodopol 23, then agitating to form the insecticidal suspo-emulsion composition.

16. A process for preparing an Oil-dispersion insecticidal composition comprising the steps of-
a. adding polyalkylene oxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, polydimethylsiloxane, propane-1,2,3-triol, castor oil ethoxylate, calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester, and a fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester mixture to methyl ester of vegetable oil in a pre-mixing vessel with a homogenizer.
b. mixing until uniform.
c. incorporating Etofenprox, Diafenthiuron, and Spiromesifen , and mixing to create a slurry.
d. reducing the particle size of the slurry using a jacketed bead mill to achieve d(90) less than 20 microns.
e. collecting the milled slurry into a post mixing vessel.
f. adding a pH stabilizer, bentonite clay, and fumed silica under stirring.
g. mixing until homogeneous to form the insecticidal Oil-dispersion formulation.