Description:FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of pesticides. The present invention in particular relates to a synergistic, broad spectrum insecticidal composition comprising Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride. The present invention further relates to the process of preparation of said composition and uses thereof.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.
Enhancement of agricultural produce requires the protection of the crops and its produce from pest damage. Various chemicals and their formulations have been developed and are in use currently for the effective management of insects and pests. Due to non-judicious use of the hitherto known pesticides, the pests gain resistance and become hard to kill. Physically compatible pesticide mixtures exhibit a better pest management. These mixtures show multifaceted advantages than when applied individually, providing a synergistic effect.
The need for more food has to be met through higher yields per unit of land, water, energy and time. Excessive use of mineral fertilizers and chemical pesticides has caused soil degradation, ground water pollution and the spread of the pest's resistant to pesticides in several areas. Hence their judicious use includes avoiding prophylactic sprays, adopting strip treatment, spot application to only those areas with heavy incidence of pests, application to the soil to avoid direct contact with the natural enemies and using selective or non-persistent pesticides. The systemic pesticides are sprayed at a concentration of 0.02 to 0.05 percent active ingredient. The contact pesticides are sprayed at 0.05 to 0.07 or even 0.1 percent active ingredient. The soil application of the granular systemic insecticides varies from 1 to 2 kg a.i./ha. The fungicides are applied up to 2 g/l depending upon the chemical used, pest species and season of the application.
Processes for insecticidal agents and compositions have been developed to control insect pests and in practice have been used as a single or a mixed agent. However, processes for the economically efficient and ecologically safe insect control compositions are still being sought. A process for the preparation of insecticidal compositions which allows for reduced effective dosage rates, increased environmental safety and lower incidence of insect resistance are highly desirable. Although the rotational application of insect control agents having different modes of action may be adopted for good pest management practice, this approach does not necessarily give satisfactory insect control. Further, even though combinations of insect control agents have been studied, a high synergistic action has not always been found. Obtaining an insecticidal composition which demonstrates no cross-resistance to existing insecticidal agents, no toxicity problems and little negative impact on the environment is extremely difficult.
Cyantraniliprole with CAS registration number 736994-63-1,is a carboxamide a ryanodine receptor agonist, it is used as insecticide for the control of whitefly, thrips, aphids, fruit flies, and fruit worms in crops such as onions, potatoes and tomatoes. It is highly toxic to honeybees. It has a role as a ryanodine receptor agonist. It is a pyrazole insecticide, a nitrile, an organochlorine compound, an organobromine compound, a member of pyridines and a secondary carboxamide.
It has an IUPAC name 5-bromo-2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-(methylcarbamoyl)phenyl]pyrazole-3-carboxamide having chemical structure as:

CYANTRANILIPROLE
Cartap hydrochloride with CAS registration number 15263-52-2, a derivative of nereistoxin, a naturally occurring insecticidal substance isolated from the marine segmented worms Lumbrinereisheteropoda and Lumbrinereisbrevicirra. Cartap hydrochloride is a highly effective, broad-spectrum, low toxic and low residual insecticide, causing paralysis by cholinergic blocking action on the central nervous system of insect. It is a systemic insecticide with stomach and contact action. Insects discontinue feeding and die of starvation
It has an IUPAC name s,s'-(2-dimethylaminotrimethylene) bis (thiocarbamate) hydrochloride] having chemical structure as:

Cartap hydrochloride
Bifenthrin with CAS registration number 82657-04-3,is a pyrethroid insecticide. It is a contact insecticide, and it acts by disrupting the gating mechanism of sodium channels that are involved in the generation and conduction of nerve impulses, causing rapid paralysis and death of the insects. Bifenthrin controls insect species such as Coleoptera, Diptera, Heteroptera, Lepidoptera, Orthoptera and some Acarina.
It has an IUPAC name (2-methylbiphenyl-3yl-methyl-(Z)-(1RS,3RS)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl]-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate.

BIFENTHRIN
The existing problems and limitations in the current agricultural pest management techniques that the present disclosure seeks to address:
1. Development of Pest Resistance:
a. Many pests have developed resistance to single active ingredient insecticides, making them less effective over time.
b. Conventional insecticides often require increased dosages to achieve the same level of pest control, which is unsustainable and increases the risk of environmental contamination.
c. The frequent use of single-action insecticides leads to the rapid evolution of resistant pest populations, reducing long-term pest management efficacy.
2. Limited Spectrum of Pest Control:
a. Single active ingredient insecticides or basic tank mixtures may not be effective against a broad range of insect pests, leading to incomplete control.
b. Farmers often need to use multiple products to target different pests, which increases costs and complicates pest management practices.
c. Existing solutions may fail to control certain pests like whiteflies, thrips, aphids, and mites effectively in crops like cotton and chili.
3. Sub optimal Synergy in Tank Mixes:
a. Tank mixtures of individual insecticides do not always exhibit true synergistic effects. The combination may result in antagonistic or merely additive effects, which do not significantly enhance pest control.
b. Inconsistent performance of tank mixes can be attributed to the instability of the combined components, leading to inadequate pest control and uneven application.
4. Stability Issues in Formulations:
a. Existing insecticidal formulations often suffer from stability issues, especially under varying environmental conditions such as high or low temperatures.
b. Instability can lead to the separation of active ingredients, reduced efficacy, and challenges in storage and transport.
c. Unstable formulations are harder to apply uniformly, affecting the overall effectiveness of pest control measures.
5. Need for Higher Dosages:
a. Due to the lack of synergistic action, traditional formulations or single active ingredient products may require higher dosages to achieve effective pest control.
b. Increased dosages not only raise the cost of pest management but also heighten the risk of crop phytotoxicity and environmental damage, including potential harm to beneficial insects and non-target organisms.
6. Environmental and Safety Concerns:
a. The use of higher concentrations of insecticides contributes to environmental pollution and poses health risks to farmworkers and consumers.
b. There is a growing need for formulations that are effective at lower concentrations, minimizing environmental impact while maintaining pest control efficacy.
c. Safety concerns also arise from formulations that produce harmful residues or have poor degradability, necessitating safer and more eco-friendly options.
7. Application Challenges and Inconsistent Results:
a. Some existing formulations are difficult to mix or apply, leading to inconsistent distribution of the insecticide on crops.
b. Poorly mixed insecticides may form clumps or separate into different phases, making uniform application challenging and reducing the effectiveness of the treatment.
c. The variability in application quality can result in areas of the crop being under protected, leaving them vulnerable to pest damage.
8. Economic Inefficiency:
a. The need for multiple insecticides or repeated applications due to inadequate control increases the financial burden on farmers.
b. Inefficient pest management practices can lead to significant crop losses and reduced profitability for farmers.
c. A more effective, stable, and broad-spectrum insecticidal composition can reduce overall costs and enhance agricultural productivity.
The present disclosure aims to overcome these limitations by providing a synergistic insecticidal composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride,, ensuring high efficacy at lower dosages, broad-spectrum pest control, formulation stability, and minimal environmental impact.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
The main objective of the disclosure is to provide a synergistic insecticidal composition combining Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride that enhances pest control efficacy beyond the sum of individual effects.
Another important object of the present disclosure is to deliver broad-spectrum pest control that effectively targets a variety of insect pests, including leaf folder across different crops like Paddy.
Another object of the present disclosure is to reduce the likelihood of pest resistance by utilizing a multi-component approach, thereby decreasing the dependence on single-action insecticides.
Yet another object of the present disclosure is to ensure stability of the formulation under various environmental conditions, minimizing separation or degradation of active ingredients for consistent performance.
Yet another object of the present disclosure is to lower the required dosage levels while maintaining effective pest control, reducing potential phytotoxicity to crops and minimizing environmental impact.
Yet another object of the present disclosure is to provide an easy-to-mix and apply formulation that ensures uniform distribution on crops, improving application efficiency and overall pest control results.
Yet another object of the present disclosure is to create an environmentally safer alternative by minimizing harmful residues, thus reducing health risks for farmers, consumers, and non-target organisms.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention provides an insecticide composition comprising Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a synergistic composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride and agrochemically acceptable additives.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a synergistic composition comprising Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride, the composition possesses Insecticidal activity.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides a method for effective control of various pests in plants.
In another aspect, the agriculturally accepted excipients are selected from the group comprising group comprising an emulsifier; dispersing agent; wetting agent; antifoaming agent; rheology modifier; solvent; pH modifier; inert carrier; biocide; an antifreezing agent; Rheology Modifier; pH Stabilizers; Binding agents ; Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent, stabilizing agent; and coloring agent wherein the composition comprises- about 0.1% to about 20.0% emulsifier; about 0.1% to about 20.0% dispersing agent; about 0.1% to about 15.0% wetting agent; about 0.01% to about 5.0% antifoaming agent; about 0.01% to about 20.0% rheology modifier; about 0% to about 95.0% solvent; about 0% to about 90.0 % inert carrier; about 0% to about 15 % anti freezing agent; about 0% to about 5 % stabilizing agent; about 00.1 to 5% binding agent; about 0.1 to 5.0% Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent,; about 0.01 to 10% pH stabilizers; about 0.01% to 5 % pH modifier; and 0.01% to 5.0 % coloring agent.
In another further aspect the insecticidal composition of the present invention is preferably formulated as a Water dispersible granules (WDG), Wettable powders (WP) ,Granules (GR) and Oil Dispersion (OD).
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the invention further provides the process for preparation of the said formulation wherein, the said formulation can be one or more of capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG) Emulsifiable water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsifiable for seed treatment (ES), Emulsifiable oil-in-water (EW), flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Suspension Concentrate (SC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible granules (WDG) and Wettable powders (WP), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC), soluble liquid (SL).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Discussed below are some representative embodiments of the present invention. The invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details and representative methods. The illustrative examples are described in this section in connection with the embodiments and methods provided. The invention according to its various aspects is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the appended claims read in view of this specification and appropriate equivalents.
It is to be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w/w” or “%” means the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solution or composition unless otherwise specified.
The term “active ingredient” (a.i.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the composition responsible for control of Fungal-pests or disease.
As used herein, the terms "comprises", "comprising", "includes", "including", or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, subject to any limitation explicitly indicated. For example, a composition or a method that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, or method.
The term "synergistic", as used herein, refers the combined action of two or more active agents blended together and administered conjointly that is greater than the sum of their individual effects.
As used herein, the term “composition” or "formulation" can be used interchangeably, unless stated otherwise, is meant to encompass, and are not limited to, compositions or formulations containing the combination of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride.
As used herein, the term “additive(s)” or "auxiliary agent(s)" or “agrochemically acceptable carrier(s)” can be used interchangeably and refers to inert substances which are commonly used as diluent, to provide stability or to increase the activity profile of the composition or formulation with or without having agrochemical activity or direct effect on the undesired phytopathogenic insects and/or microorganisms.
As used herein, the term "agrochemically acceptable salts" are typically acid addition salts of inorganic or organic acids, preferably of hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, perchloric acid, phosphoric acid, formic acid, acetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, oxalic acid, malonic acid, toluenesulfonic acid or benzoic acid.
As used herein, the term "effective amount" means the amount of the active substances in the compositions to achieve an observable effect on growth, including the effects of necrosis, death, retardation, prevention, and removal, destruction, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of the target organism. The effective amount can vary for the various compositions used in the present invention. An effective amount of the compositions will also vary according to the prevailing conditions such as desired pesticidal effect and duration, weather, target species, locus, mode of application, and the like.
In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Cyantraniliprole ranging from 0.1% to 25.0% by weight of the Insecticidal composition.
In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Bifenthrin ranging from 0.1% to 25.0% by weight of the Insecticidal composition.
In an embodiment, the Insecticidal composition wherein the Cartap hydrochloride ranging from 0.1% to 50.0% by weight of the Insecticidal composition.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the invention further provides the process for preparation of the said formulation wherein, the said formulation can be one or more of as suspension concentrate (SC), wettable granules (WG), wettable powder (WP), a water dispersible granule (WDG), a water dispersible tablet (WT), an ultra-low volu (ULV) liquid (UL), an ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension (SU), a water soluble powder (SP), a suspo-emulsion (SE), granule (GR), an emulsifiable granule (EG), an oil-in-water or water in oil emulsion (EW), an emulsifiable concentrate (EC), a micro-emulsion (ME), an oil dispersion (OD), a capsule suspension (CS), a dustable powder (DP) or an aerosol (AE).
In preferred embodiment of the present invention, the formulation is Suspension Concentrate (SC), Suspo-emulsion (SE), oil dispersion (OD), Water dispersible granules (WDG), Granules (GR) and Wettable powders (WP).
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the agrochemically acceptable excipients of the formulation are selected from the group consisting of Emulsifiers dispersing agents, wetting agents, antifoaming agents, Rheology modifiers, binding agents, solvents, inert carrier, biocides, pH Modifiers, Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent, pH Stabilizers, Stabilizing agents, anti-freezing agent and coloring agents .
Emulsifiers is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to ethoxylated propoxylated alcohols, alkylphenol ethoxylates, alkoxylatedtristyrylphenols, calcium dodecyl benzenesulfonate, mixture of fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester, ethoxylated propoxylatedpolyaryl phenol, ethoxylated fatty acids, fatty alcohol ethoxylates, ethoxylatedricinoleic acid triglycerides, sorbitan trioleate, tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, castor oil ethoxylate, alkoxylated phosphate ester or mixtures thereof; These binders or adhesive imparting agents may be used alone or in combination thereof. The Emulsifiers is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to polymeric ester dispersant, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate/naphthalene sulphonic acid condensate, acrylic copolymer,nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, polycarboxylates, calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, aryl sulphonate condensate,sodium lignosulphonate, dispertox BS SPL, polystyrenated acrylated co-polymer, modified styrene acrylic copolymer, salts of phenol sulfonic acids, Terwet 2700,butyl polyalkylene oxide block co-polymer, mixture of tristyrylphenolethoxylates and polyalkylene oxide derivative of a synthetic alcohol, random co-polymer of alcoxylated polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof; The Dispersing agent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Wetting agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, alpha olefin sulfonates, disodium laureth sulfosuccinate, diisodecyl sodium sulfosuccinate, alkyl sulfosuccinic monoesters, dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt, sulfonic acids C14-16-alkane hydroxy and C14-16-alkene sodium salts, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene ether or mixtures thereof. The Wetting agent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 15.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Antifoaming agent is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to polydimethyl siloxane, polydimethyl siloxane emulsion or mixtures thereof; The Antifoaming agent is present in an amount of from 0.01% to 5.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Rheology modifier is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to precipitated silica, fumed silica, modified fumed silica, bentonite, hydroxymethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, thickening silica, hydrated clay minerals, magnesium aluminium silicates, organic derivative of hectorite clay, hydrophobic fumed silica, Bentonite clay, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or mixture thereof; The Rheology modifier is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 20.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Solvents is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to Demineralized (DM) water, N-alkyl-pyrrolidone, oil medium selected from the group comprising, esterified fatty acids selected from methyl and/or ethyl ester of vegetable oil such as methyl soyate, ethyl soyate, rapeseed methyl ester, rapeseed ethyl ester or mixtures thereof. The Solvents is present in an amount of from 0% to 95% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Anti freezing agents is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to selected from the group comprising of ethylene glycol, propane-1,2-diol, propane-1,2,3-triol, urea or mixtures thereof. The Anti freezing agent is present in an amount of from 0% to 15% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Stabilizing agents is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to selected from the group comprising of epoxidized soyabean oil, butylated hydroxy toluene, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, sodium benzoate, etc. or mixtures thereof. The Stabilizing agents is present in an amount of from 0% to 5% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
PH modifiers is selected from the group comprising of, but not limited to selected from the group comprising of sodium pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, sodium oxalate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, trisodium phosphate, trisodium citrate, monoethanol amine, triethanol amine, triethylamine, dibasic esters selected from dimethyl succinate, dimethyl glutarate, dimethyl adipate, ortho phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, hydrochloric acid or mixtures thereof. The pH modifier is present in an amount of from 0.01% to 5% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Inert carrier is selected from the group comprising of kaolin, china clay, alumina, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, crushed and fractionated natural minerals such as calcite, marble, pumice, dextrin, precipitated silica, sepiolite, bentonite, river sand, white sand, zeolites, starch, sand, talc, quartz, dolomite, diatomaceous earth, aluminium oxide, silicates, calcium phosphates, calcium hydrogen phosphates, ammonium sulphate or mixtures thereof. The inert carrier is present in an amount of from 0% to 90.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Binding agent is selected from the group comprising of aluminium silicate, precipitated silica, fumed silica, diatomaceous earth, glucose polymers: amylose and amylopectin, a branched form, lactose anhydrous, silicic acid, sodium lignosulonate, modified phyllosilicate, Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate either alone or mixtures thereof. The binding agent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 5.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
pH Stabilizers selected from the group comprising of sodium pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, sodium oxalate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, trisodium phosphate, citric acid, trisodium citrate, monoethanol amine, triethanol amine, triethylamine, dibasic esters selected from dimethyl succinate, dimethyl glutarate, dimethyl adipate, ortho phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, hydrochloric acid. The pH Stabilizers is present in an amount of from 0.01% to 10.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Coloring agent is selected from the group comprising of dye, pigment or mixtures thereof such as Triaryl methane acid blue, 3-hydroxy-N-(2-methylphenyl)-4-[(E)-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)diazinyl]-2-naphthamide and Acid Brilliant Green. The Coloring agent is present in an amount of 0.01% to 5.0 % by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent is blend of methylated seed oil-organic silicone compound may be selected from methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified trisiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified polydimethylsiloxane, methylated seed oil-20 trisiloxane ethoxylate, Polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane methylated seed oil-polyoxyethylene methyl polysiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyether polymethyl siloxane copolymer, methylated seed oil-polyether modified polysiloxane. The Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 5.0% by weight based on a total weight of the composition.
The composition of the present invention is effective for management of insect or pests selected from one or more of Cotton (Gossypium spp.), Paddy (Oryza sativa), Wheat (Triticumaestavum), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), Maize (Zea mays), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) , Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), Soybean (Glycin max), Peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) , Mustard (Brassica juncea), Rape seed (Brassica napus), Linseed (Linum usitatissimum), Sesame (Sesamum indicum), Castor (Ricinus communis), Green gram (Vigna radiate), Black gram (Vigna mungo), Chickpea (Ciceraritinum), Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), Redgram (Cajanus cajan), Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Indian bean (Lablab purpureus), Horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum), Field pea (Pisum sativum), Cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), Lentils (Lens culinaris), Brinjal (Solanum melongena), Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), Onion (Allium cepa L.), Tomato (Solanum lycopersicun) , Potato (Solanum tuberosum) , Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), Chilly (Capsicum annum), Garlic (Allium sativum), Cucumber (Cucumis sativus), Muskmelons (Cucumis melo), Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia), Radish (Raphanus sativus), Carrot (Dacus carota subsp. sativus), Turnip (Brassica rapasubsprapa), Apple (Melus domestica), Banana (Musa 25 spp.), Citrus groups (Citrus spp.), Grape (Vitis vinifera), Guava (Psidium guajava), Litchi (Litchi chinensis), Mango (Mangifera indica), Papaya (Carica papaya), Pineapple (Ananas comosus), Pomegranate (Punica granatum) , Sapota (Manilkara zapota), Tea (Camellia sinensis), Coffea (Coffea Arabica), Turmeric (Curcuma longa), Ginger (Zingiber officinale), Cumin (Cuminum cyminum), Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-30 graecum), Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), Coriander (Coriandrum sativum), Ajwain (Trachyspermumammi), Psyllium (Plantago ovate), Black Pepper (Piper nigrum), Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana), Safedmusli (Chlorophytum tuberosum), Drum stick (Moringa oleifera), Coconut (Coco nucifera), Mentha ( Mentha spp.), Rose (Rosa spp.), Jasmine (Jasminum spp.), Marigold (Tagetes spp.), Common daisy (Bellis perennis), Dahlia (Dahlia hortnesis), Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii), Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) or GMO form thereof.
In yet another preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a insecticidal combination or composition comprising of Cyantraniliprole Bifenthrin and Cartap hydrochloride to control the pathogenic microorganism on economically important crops such as rice, chilli, apple, peppers, soybean, cotton, chick pea, Brinjal, pigeon pea, Grapes, Apple and pomegranate, tea, potato, and tomato.
The invention is illustrated by the experiments as exemplified below.
Examples:
The examples below are given solely for the purpose of illustration and are not to be construed as limitations of the present invention, as many variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Example 1: Preparation of insecticidal composition as Water dispersible granule (WDG):
In an embodiment, the chemical composition of the present insecticidal is depicted below in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Insecticidal Composition for Water dispersible granule (WDG).
Component Quantity
(% w/w) Function
Cyantraniliprole technical 8.50 Active ingredient
Bifenthrin technical 4.50 Active ingredient
Cartap Hydrochloride technical 35.50 Active ingredient
Sodium lauryl sulphate 3.00 Wetting agent
Sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate 3.00 Dispersing agent
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyoxyethylene Ether 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer 1.50 Emulsifier
Ethoxylated tristyrylphenol 1.50 Emulsifier
Polydimethylsiloxane emulsion 0.50 Antifoaming agent
Tartaric acid 3.00 pH modifier
Citric acid 0.50 pH modifier
Polyvinylpyrrolidone 2.00 Binding agent
Ammonium sulphate 1.00 Inert carrier
Dextrin 5.00 Inert carrier
Precipitated silica 2.00 Inert carrier
Kaolin QS Inert carrier

Process for preparing Water dispersible granule (WDG) formulation:
The required amounts of Cyantraniliprole technical, Bifenthrin technical, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, dextrin, tartaric acid, citric acid, polyvinylpyrrolidone, ammonium sulphate, precipitated silica and kaolin were blended with suitable equipment. The mixture was milled with appropriate equipment to form milled Cyantraniliprole and Bifenthrin pre-mix. To this milled Cyantraniliprole and Bifenthrin pre-mix required amount of Cartap Hydrochloride technical, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene ether, polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer, ethoxylated tristyrylphenoland polydimethylsiloxane emulsion were blended. Then dough was prepared by adding appropriate amount of water. The dough was extruded with the help of a suitable extruder. The extrudes were dried with appropriate equipment. The dried extrude was sieved to form insecticidal composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap Hydrochloride water dispersible granules.
Example 2: Preparation of insecticidal composition as wettable powder (WP) formulation:
Table-1 (b): Insecticidal Composition of the wettable powder (WP) formulation
Component Quantity
(% w/w) Function
Cyantraniliprole technical 8.50 Active ingredient
Bifenthrin technical 4.50 Active ingredient
Cartap Hydrochloride technical 35.50 Active ingredient
Sodium lauryl sulphate 3.00 Wetting agent
Sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate 3.00 Dispersing agent
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyoxyethylene Ether 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer 1.50 Emulsifier
Ethoxylated tristyrylphenol 1.50 Emulsifier
Polydimethylsiloxane emulsion 0.50 Antifoaming agent
Tartaric acid 3.00 pH modifier
Citric acid 0.50 pH modifier
Ammonium sulphate 1.00 Inert carrier
Dextrin 5.00 Inert carrier
Precipitated silica 3.00 Inert carrier
Kaolin QS Inert carrier

Process for preparing wettable powder (WP) formulation:
The required amounts of Cyantraniliprole technical, Bifenthrin technical,sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, dextrin, tartaric acid, citric acid, ammonium sulphate, precipitated silica and kaolin were blended with suitable equipment. The mixture was milled with appropriate equipment to form milled Cyantraniliprole and Bifenthrin pre-mix. To this milled Cyantraniliprole and Bifenthrin pre-mix required amount of Cartap Hydrochloride technical, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene ether, polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer, ethoxylated tristyrylphenol and polydimethylsiloxane emulsion were blended with suitable equipment to form insecticidal composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap Hydrochloride wettable powder.
Example 3: Preparation of insecticidal composition as granules (GR) formulation:
Table-1 (c): Insecticidal Composition of the granules (GR) formulation
Component Quantity
(% w/w) Function
Cyantraniliprole technical 0.85 Active ingredient
Bifenthrin technical 0.45 Active ingredient
Cartap Hydrochloride technical 3.55 Active ingredient
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyoxyethylene ether 1.00 Wetting agent
Polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer 0.50 Emulsifier
Ethoxylated tristyrylphenol 0.50 Emulsifier
Polyvinylpyrrolidone 0.50 Binding agent
Acid Brilliant Green 0.10 Coloring agent
Citric acid 0.50 pH modifier
Precipitated silica 0.30 Inert carrier
China clay 4.00 Inert carrier
White sand QS Inert carrier
Process for preparing granules (GR) formulation:
The required amount of white sand was added appropriate mixing vessel. To this polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene ether, polyalkoxylated butyl ether block co-polymer and ethoxylated tristyrylphenol added under mixing. Then Cyantraniliprole (pre-grinded), Bifenthrin (pre-grinded) and Cartap Hydrochloride, dye, polyvinylpyrrolidone, citric acid, china clay and precipitated silica were added and blended with for sufficient time. The material then sieved with suitable sieve to form insecticidal composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap Hydrochloride granules.
Example 4: Preparation of insecticidal composition as Oil Dispersion (OD) formulation:
Table-1 (d): Insecticidal Composition of Oil Dispersion (OD) formulation.
Component Composition (%w/w) Remark
Cyantraniliprole technical 4.25 Active Ingredient
Bifenthrin technical 2.25 Active Ingredient
Cartap Hydrochloride technical 17.75 Active Ingredient
Castor oil ethoxylate (10 mole) 6.00 Emulsifier
Calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate 2.00 Emulsifier
Mixture of fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester 4.00 Emulsifier
Polymeric ester dispersant 0.5 Dispersing agent
Ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester 0.5 Dispersing agent
Propane-1,2,3-triol 2.00 Anti freezing Agent
Polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane 1.00 Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent
Polydimethylsiloxane 0.30 Antifoaming agent
Fumed silica 1.50 Rheology modifier
Citric acid 0.10 pH stabilizer
Sodium benzoate 1.00 Stabilizing agent
Bentonite clay 1.50 Rheology modifier
Methyl ester of vegetable oil Balance to 100 Solvent

Process for preparing Oil Dispersion (OD) formulation
In methyl ester of vegetable oil constituents namely, polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane, polydimethylsiloxane, propane-1,2,3-triol, castor oil ethoxylate (10 mole),calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester, mixture of fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester and polymeric ester dispersant were added into the clean pre-mixing vessel fitted with the homogenizer and all the ingredients were mixed for sufficient time with the homogenizer to obtain a mixture. The active ingredients, Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap Hydrochloride as well as pH stabilizer and stabilizing agent were added to the obtained mixture and continued to mix for sufficient time with the homogenizer to obtain a slurry. The slurry was passed through jacketed bead mill with chilled water circulation for particle size reduction to obtain a milled slurry of desirable particle size. The milled slurry was collected into post mixing vessel fitted with the stirrer. To milled slurry bentonite clayand fumed silica were added under stirring into the post mixing vessel and continued to mix for sufficient time up to proper mixing to form insecticidal composition of Cyantraniliprole, Bifenthrin and Cartap Hydrochloride oil dispersion (OD) formulation.

Stability Data
Stability Study (Accelerated Storage test and low-temperature storage test)
According to the FAO/WHO manual, the “accelerated storage test” is considered as an indicative of product stability. That is, accelerated storage test data provides an indication that the product is stable for at least two years at ambient temperature. Further, the FAO/WHO manual indicates storage at 54 ± 2°C for 14 days as the default test conditions. Further, the FAO/WHO manual indicates low-temperature storage at 0 ± 2°C for 7 days.
The “accelerated storage” is the sample after subjecting the sample to accelerated storage tests at 54±2°C for 14 days.
The insecticidal formulation composition of examples 1 - 3 were found stable after accelerated stability study at 54 ± 2° C for 14 days. The insecticidal formulation composition of example 4 was found stable after accelerated stability study at 54 ± 2° C for 14 days and low temperature at 0 ± 2°C for 7 days.

Example 5: Bioefficacy and phytotoxicity of an Insecticidal Composition and thereof (Cyantraniliprole + Bifenthrin + Cartap hydrochloride) on paddy against leaf folder.
Table 2: Effect of different treatments on population of Leaf folder (Rice)-
Sr. No. Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha % Leaf infestation
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 5 DAT 10 DAT % reduction over control 10 DAT Colby value 10 DAT 15 DAT % reduction over control 15 DAT Colby value 15 DAT
1 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD 90 900 8.24
(16.75) 9.58
(17..84) 55.81 10.54
(18.98) 55.40
2 Bifenthrin 10% EC 50 500 9.51
(18.03) 10.42
(18.76) 51.94 11.76
(19.67) 50.23
3 Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 500 1000 10.52
(18.94) 11.27
(19.12) 48.02 13.35
(22.23) 43.50
4 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 90 +50+500 900+500+1000 3.16
(10.25) 2.25
(9.29) 89.62 1.01 2.74
(9.79) 88.40 1.01
5 Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5% 45 + 24 + 165 600 4.82
(12.66) 3.79
(10.87) 82.52 0.93 4.83
(12.75) 79.56 0.91
6 Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5% 52.50 + 28 + 192.50 700 4.15
(11.73) 3.32
(10.48) 84.69 0.95 3.81
(11.17) 83.88 0.96
7 Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5% 60 + 32 + 220 800 3.38
(10.47) 2.76
(9.83) 87.27 0.98 3.73
(10.82) 84.26 0.96
8 Untreated Check - - 17.96
(25.14) 21.68
(28.04) 0.00 23.63
(29.10) 0.00
CD at 5% (2.20) (2.63) (1.76)
SE (m) (0.69) (0.87) (0.58)
DAT: Days after Treatment; Figures in parenthesis are arc sin transformed values

Among all the doses rates of combination and individualtreatment, Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha and Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5% @ 60 + 32 + 220 gm a.i./ha and @ 52.50 + 28 + 192.50 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent leaf infestation by leaf folder at 5th, 10th and 15th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed 88.40%, 84.26% and 83.88% reduction over control at 15 DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5% showed better result compared to individual application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD @ 90 gm a.i./ha (55.40%), Bifenthrin 10% EC @ 50 gm a.i./ha (50.23%) and Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 500 gm a.i./ha (43.50%) against leaf folder of Rice at 15 DAT. The application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha showed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.01 (>1) at 15 DAT (Table 2)

Table 3: Effect of Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% treatments on population of Leaf folder (Rice)-
Sr. No. Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha % Leaf infestation
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 5 DAT 10 DAT % reduction over control 10 DAT Colby value 10 DAT 15 DAT % reduction over control 15 DAT Colby value 15 DAT
1 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD 90 900 9.34
(17.65) 9.52
(17.73) 53.29 10.52
(18.56) 52.76
2 Bifenthrin 10% EC 50 500 10.27
(18.48) 10.19
(18.39) 50.00 11.46
(19.27) 48.54
3 Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 500 1000 11.38
(19.24) 11.65
(19.74) 42.84 13.38
(21.15) 39.92
4 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 90 +50+500 900+500+1000 3.36
(10.50) 2.19
(9.18) 89.25 1.03 2.65
(9.32) 88.10 1.03
5 Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% 51 + 27 + 213 600 5.18
(13.05) 3.64
(10.72) 82.14 0.95 4.33
(11.12) 80.56 0.94
6 Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% 59.50 + 31.50 + 248.50 700 2.42
(9.53) 1.81
(6.13) 91.12 1.05 2.19
(9.20) 90.17 1.06
7 Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% 68 + 36 + 284 800 1.95
(6.13) 1.73
(6.04) 91.51 1.06 2.08
(9.06) 90.66 1.06
8 Untreated Check - - 18.61
(25.68) 20.38
(26.75) 0.00 22.27
(28.57) 0.00
CD at 5% (2.37) (2.53) (1.85)
SE (m) (0.60) (0.86) (0.48)
DAT: Days after Treatment; Figures in parenthesis are arc sin transformed values

Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individual treatment, Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha and Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% @ 68 + 36 + 284 gm a.i./ha and @ 59.50 + 31.50 + 248.50 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent leaf infestation by leaf folder at 5th, 10th and 15th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed at par results with 88.10%, 90.66% and 90.17% reduction over control at 15 DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% showed better result compared to individual application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD @ 90 gm a.i./ha (52.76%), Bifenthrin 10% EC @ 50 gm a.i./ha (48.54%) and Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 500 gm a.i./ha (39.92%) against leaf folder of Rice at 15 DAT.
The application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha and Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% @ 68 + 36 + 284 gm a.i./ha and @ 59.50 + 31.50 + 248.50 gm a.i./ha, showed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.03, 1.06 & 1.06 respectively (>1) at 15 DAT (Table 3).

Table 4: Effect of Cyantraniliprole 9.5% + Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% treatments on population of Leaf folder (Rice).
Sr. No. Treatment Compositions Dosage/ha % Leaf infestation
Dosage/ha
a.i. (gm) Formulation (gm/ml) 5 DAT 10 DAT % reduction over control 10 DAT Colby value 10 DAT 15 DAT % reduction over control 15 DAT Colby value 15 DAT
1 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD 90 900 8.37
(16.74) 7.48
(15.26) 60.98 9.68
(18.07) 58.31
2 Bifenthrin 10% EC 50 500 9.72
(18.15) 9.65
(18.06) 49.66 12.13
(20.12) 47.76
3 Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 500 1000 10.63
(18.98) 10.37
(18.82) 45.91 12.83
(20.53) 44.75
4 Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP 90 +50+500 900+500+1000 1.95
(7.26) 1.90
(7.21) 90.09 1.01 2.57
(9.46) 88.93 1.01
5 Cyantraniliprole 9.5% +Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% 57 + 36 + 240 600 4.63
(11.88) 2.85
(9.82) 85.13 0.95 3.78
(10.51) 83.72 0.95
6 Cyantraniliprole 9.5% +Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% 66.50 + 42 + 280 700 2.59
(9.65) 1.45
(6.05) 92.46 1.03 1.96
(7.20) 91.56 1.04
7 Cyantraniliprole 9.5% +Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% 76 + 48 + 320 800 1.88
(7.19) 1.38
(5.89) 92.80 1.04 1.70
(7.08) 92.68 1.05
8 Untreated Check - - 16.34
(16.27) 19.17
(26.31) 0.00 23.22
(29.56) 0.00
CD at 5% (2.25) (2.68) (1.79)
SE (m) (0.66) (0.74) (0.61)
DAT: Days after Treatment; Figures in parenthesis are arc sin transformed values

Results:
Among all the doses rates of combination and individual treatment, Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha and Cyantraniliprole 9.5% + Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% @ 76 + 48 + 320 gm a.i./ha and @ 66.50 + 42 + 280 gm a.i./ha, treated plots were observed with highest per cent reduction over control, along with lowest per cent leaf infestation by leaf folder at 5th, 10th and 15th days after treatment (DAT) in comparison with other treatments. All the three doses showed at par results with 88.93%, 92.68% and 91.56% reduction over control at 15 DAT, respectively.
All the doses of Cyantraniliprole 9.5% + Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% showed better result compared to individual application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD @ 90 gm a.i./ha (58.31%), Bifenthrin 10% EC @ 50 gm a.i./ha (47.76%) and Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 500 gm a.i./ha (44.75%) against leaf folder of Rice at 15 DAT.
The application of Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP @ 90 +50+500 gm a.i./ha and Cyantraniliprole 9.5% + Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% @ 76 + 48 + 320 gm a.i./ha and @ 66.50 + 42 + 280 gm a.i./ha, showed synergistic effect with the synergistic ratio 1.01, 1.04 & 1.05 respectively (>1) at 15 DAT (Table 4).
Phytotoxicity observations
For the evaluation of phytotoxicity on brinjal, cotton and tomato crops, observations were made by observing the temporary or long lasting damage to the leaves if any viz., yellowing, wilting, necrosis, epinasty and hyponasty at 5, 10 and 15DAT of the synergistic insecticidal composition of the present invention. Crop injury was observed on visual rating from 0-10 scale as presented in Table 1.

Phytotoxicity rating scale
Rating Crop Injury (%) Verbal Description
0 - No symptoms
1 1-10 Verbal slight discoloration
2 11-20 More severe, but not lasting
3 21-30 Moderate and more lasting
4 31-40 Medium and lasting
5 41-50 Moderately heavy
6 51-60 Heavy
7 61-70 Very heavy
8 71-80 Nearly destroyed
9 81-90 Destroyed
10 91-100 Completely destroyed

Table 5: Phytotoxic effect of synergistic composition of the present invention on Rice
Treatments Phytotoxicity rating
Yellowing Wilting Necrosis Epinasty Hyponasty
Days After Spray
5 10 15 5 10 15 5 10 15 5 10 15 5 10 15
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Conclusion
After evaluation of three formulations i.e., Cyantraniliprole 7.5% + Bifenthrin 4.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 27.5%, Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% and Cyantraniliprole 9.5% + Bifenthrin 6.0% + Cartap hydrochloride 40% at three different doses (600 ml/ ha, 700 ml/ha & 800 ml/ha). Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% @ 700 ml/ ha found to be effective against Leaf folder of Rice crop in comparison to Tank mix formulation (Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD + Bifenthrin 10% EC + Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP) as well as solo treatments (Cyantraniliprole 10.26% OD, Bifenthrin 10% EC & Cartap hydrochloride 50% SP). Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% @ 700 ml/ ha was found at par with higher formulation, higher dose and higher active ingredient.
Therefore, application of Cyantraniliprole 8.5% + Bifenthrin 4.5% + Cartap hydrochloride 35.5% @ 700 ml/ ha (59.50 + 31.50 + 248.50 gm a.i/ ha) formulation can be recommended for effective control of Leaf folder in Rice crop. , Claims:
1. An insecticidal composition, comprising:
(a) 0.1% to about 25.0% Cyantraniliprole, by weight of the composition;
(b) 0.1% to about 25.0% Bifenthrin by weight of the composition ;
(c) about 0.1% to about 50.0% Cartap hydrochloride by weight of the composition; and
(d) agriculturally accepted excipient.

2. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is selected from a suspension concentrate (SC), flowable suspension for seed treatment (FS), oil dispersion (OD), suspo-emulsion (SE), water-dispersible granule (WDG), or wettable powder (WP).

3. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the agriculturally accepted excipient is selected from the group comprising emulsifier; dispersing agent; wetting agent; antifoaming agent; rheology modifier; solvent; pH modifier; inert carrier; binding agent; an anti freezing agent; pH Stabilizers; Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent; stabilizing agent; and coloring agent wherein the composition comprises- about 0.1% to about 20.0% emulsifier; about 0.1% to about 20.0% dispersing agent; about 0.1% to about 15.0% wetting agent; about 0.01% to about 5.0% antifoaming agent; about 0.01% to about 20.0% rheology modifier; about 0% to about 95.0% solvent; about 0% to about 90.0 % inert carrier; about 0% to about 15 % antifreezing agent; about 0% to about 5 % stabilizing agent; about 00.1 to 5% binding agent ; about 0.1% to about 5.0% Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent; 0.01 to 10 % pH Stabilizers; about 0.01% to 5 % pH modifier; and 0.01% to 5.0 % coloring agent.

4. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the emulsifier is selected from the group comprising ethoxylated propoxylated alcohols, alkylphenolethoxylates, alkoxylatedtristyrylphenols, calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, mixture of fatty acid polyethylene glycol ester, ethoxylated propoxylatedpolyaryl phenol, ethoxylated fatty acids, fatty alcohol ethoxylates, ethoxylated ricinoleic acid triglycerides, sorbitan trioleate, tridecyl alcohol ethoxylate, castor oil ethoxylate, alkoxylated phosphate ester or mixtures thereof.

5. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising polymeric ester dispersant, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate ester, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, acrylic copolymer, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, polycarboxylates, calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, aryl sulphonate condensate, sodium lignosulphonate, dispertox BS SPL, polystyrenated acrylated co-polymer, modified styrene acrylic copolymer, salts of phenol sulfonic acids, Terwet 2700, butyl polyalkylene oxide block co-polymer, mixture of tristyrylphenol ethoxylates and polyalkylene oxide derivative of a synthetic alcohol, random co-polymer of alcoxylated polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof.

6. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the wetting agent is selected from the group comprising sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, alpha olefin sulfonates, disodium laureth sulfosuccinate, diisodecyl sodium sulfosuccinate, alkyl sulfosuccinic monoesters, dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt, sulfonic acids C14-16-alkane hydroxy and C14-16-alkene sodium salts, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene ether or mixtures thereof.

7. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the antifoaming agent is selected from the group comprising polydimethyl siloxane, polydimethyl siloxane emulsion or mixtures thereof.

8. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the rheology modifier is selected from the group comprising precipitated silica, fumed silica, modified fumed silica, bentonite, hydroxymethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, thickening silica, Bentonite clay, hydrated clay minerals, magnesium aluminium silicates, organic derivative of hectorite clay, hydrophobic fumed silica, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) or mixture thereof.

9. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the solvent is selected Demineralized (DM) water, N-alkyl-pyrrolidone, oil medium selected from the group comprising, esterified fatty acids selected from methyl and/or ethyl ester of vegetable oil such as methyl soyate, ethyl soyate, rapeseed methyl ester, rapeseed ethyl ester or mixtures thereof.

10. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the binding is selected from the group comprising aluminium silicate, precipitated silica, fumed silica, diatomaceous earth, glucose polymers, Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, amylose and amylopectin, a branched form, lactose anhydrous, silicic acid, sodium lignosulonate, modified phyllosilicate, either alone or mixtures thereof.

11. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein inert carrier is selected from the group comprising kaolin, china clay, dextrin, alumina, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite, crushed and fractionated natural minerals such as calcite, marble, pumice, precipitated silica, sepiolite, bentonite, river sand, white sand, zeolites, starch, sand, talc, quartz, dolomite, diatomaceous earth, aluminium oxide, silicates, calcium phosphates, calcium hydrogen phosphates, ammonium sulphate or mixtures thereof.

12. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the anti freezing agent is selected from the group comprising ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol, propane-1,2,3-triol, urea or mixtures thereof.

13. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the stabilizing agent is selected from the group comprising epoxidized soyabean oil, butylated hydroxy toluene, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, sodium benzoate, etc. or mixtures thereof.

14. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the pH modifier is selected from the group comprising sodium pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, sodium oxalate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, trisodium phosphate, trisodium citrate, monoethanol amine, triethanol amine, triethylamine, dibasic esters selected from dimethyl succinate, dimethyl glutarate, dimethyl adipate, ortho phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, hydrochloric acid or mixtures thereof.

15. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the coloring agent is selected from selected from dye, pigment or mixtures thereof such as Triaryl methane acid blue, 3-hydroxy-N-(2-methylphenyl)-4-[(E)-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)diazinyl]-2-naphthamide and Acid Brilliant Green.

16. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the Super-Wetting-spreading-penetrating agent is blend of methylated seed oil-organic silicone compound may be selected from methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified trisiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyalkyleneoxide modified polydimethylsiloxane, methylated seed oil-20 trisiloxane ethoxylate, Polyalkyleneoxide modified heptamethyltrisiloxane methylated seed oil-polyoxyethylene methyl polysiloxane, methylated seed oil-polyether polymethyl siloxane copolymer, methylated seed oil-polyether modified polysiloxane.

17. The insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein the pH Stabilizers selected from the group comprising of sodium pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, sodium oxalate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, trisodium phosphate, citric acid, trisodium citrate, monoethanol amine, triethanol amine, triethylamine, dibasic esters selected from dimethyl succinate, dimethyl glutarate, dimethyl adipate, ortho phosphoric acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, hydrochloric acid.

18. The process of preparation of an insecticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, the process comprising: preparation of the said composition with agriculturally acceptable excipients.