DESC:SYSTEM TO ENABLE SECURE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A COMPUTING DEVICE AND A VEHICLE
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICTIONS
The present application claims priority from Indian Provisional Patent Application No. 202X210 filed on DD/MM/YYYY, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by a reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure generally relates to secure communication systems. Further, the present disclosure particularly relates to a system to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle.
BACKGROUND
Secure communication between computing devices and vehicles is a significant aspect of modern vehicular systems. Further, various authentication mechanisms are employed to verify the identity of communicating entities before establishing communication sessions. Moreover, authentication mechanisms in conventional vehicular communication systems comprise pre-shared keys, static encryption keys, and certificate-based authentication.
Further, pre-shared key authentication mechanisms involve the use of a common secret key between communicating entities. Moreover, such mechanisms require manual key distribution, which increases the risk of unauthorized access if the key is compromised. Furthermore, pre-shared key authentication mechanisms lack scalability and flexibility, particularly when multiple computing devices are required to communicate with a vehicle in dynamic environments.
Moreover, static encryption key mechanisms employ fixed cryptographic keys to secure communication sessions. Further, the use of static encryption keys leads to vulnerabilities, as attackers can exploit compromised keys to decrypt intercepted communication. Furthermore, replacing static encryption keys in large-scale vehicular networks is challenging due to key management complexities.
Additionally, certificate-based authentication mechanisms utilize digital certificates issued by certificate authorities to authenticate communicating entities. Further, said mechanisms rely on a centralized infrastructure for certificate issuance and revocation. Moreover, certificate revocation and renewal processes introduce latency in secure communication establishment. Furthermore, unauthorized access remains a concern if an attacker gains access to valid certificates through credential theft or fraudulent certificate issuance.
Additionally, conventional vehicular communication systems lack real-time monitoring of communication patterns. Further, the absence of real-time monitoring increases the risk of undetected intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors. Moreover, unauthorized entities can exploit the lack of monitoring to gain unauthorized access or inject malicious data into vehicular communication networks. Furthermore, delayed detection of security threats leads to increased vulnerabilities in data transmission between computing devices and vehicles.
Moreover, malware attacks on computing devices interacting with vehicles pose additional security risks. Further, malware attacks compromise data integrity and confidentiality, resulting in unauthorized modifications of transmitted data. Furthermore, conventional systems lack mechanisms to analyze the integrity of computing devices during authenticated communication sessions. Additionally, the absence of security breach identification techniques prevents effective countermeasures from being activated, thereby increasing the risk of data compromise.
In light of the above discussion, there exists an urgent need for solutions that overcome the problems associated with conventional systems and techniques for enabling secure communication between computing devices and vehicles.
SUMMARY
The aim of the present disclosure is to provide secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle by authenticating communication entities, preventing encryption key reuse, monitoring communication patterns, and mitigating malware attacks while preserving data confidentiality.
The present disclosure relates to a system to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. A processing unit and a memory are comprised in the system. The memory is operatively coupled to the processing unit. The memory stores computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processing unit, cause the system to receive a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle. The digital certificate serves as an authentication credential verifying an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session. A dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session is generated. The dynamic encryption key is generated to prevent reuse of the key across multiple communication sessions. Communication patterns are monitored in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors. Deviations from predefined secure communication parameters trigger predefined security responses. System integrity is analyzed in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session. The analysis identifies security breaches and activates countermeasures to mitigate the detected malware attack while preserving confidentiality of data exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle.
Further, a physical pairing process between the computing device and the vehicle is required before enabling communication. The physical pairing process comprises an authentication step which mandates direct interaction between the computing device and the vehicle to establish a trusted communication channel. A multi-factor authentication mechanism is implemented by the processing unit. The multi-factor authentication mechanism verifies behavioral interaction patterns between the computing device and the vehicle before allowing access. The behavioral interaction patterns comprise a device interaction frequency, keystroke dynamics, gesture recognition, mouse movement characteristics, and navigation behavior within the computing device. Furthermore, the vehicle initiates secure communication with the computing device under predefined conditions comprising remote diagnostics and preventive maintenance. Additionally, customizable privacy settings are provided to regulate access permissions of the computing device to specific vehicle systems.
Moreover, an Over-The-Air (OTA) update mechanism is incorporated within the processing unit. The OTA update mechanism enables wireless delivery of security patches and software updates to the vehicle and the computing device. Further, prioritization of OTA updates is performed based on the severity of detected intrusion attempts in the computing device and the vehicle. Additionally, an emergency access mechanism is provided to enable authorized personnel to securely access specific vehicle systems under predefined emergency conditions. Furthermore, an adaptive security response mechanism is implemented to adjust encryption strength based on communication risk levels detected during active sessions.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for enabling secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. The method comprises receiving a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle. The digital certificate serves as an authentication credential verifying an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session. A dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session is generated. The dynamic encryption key is generated to prevent key reuse across multiple communication sessions. Communication patterns are monitored in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors. Deviations from predefined secure communication parameters trigger predefined security responses. System integrity is analyzed in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session. The analysis identifies security breaches and activates countermeasures to mitigate the detected malware attack while preserving confidentiality of data exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle.
Further, encryption key generation parameters are modified based on the computational capability of the computing device. A dual-channel authentication process is initiated which requires simultaneous verification from an external security server and the vehicle. Additionally, an access duration token is generated to define a predetermined session expiration time based on a risk assessment. Furthermore, security threats detected in communication patterns are prioritized based on the type of intrusion attempt. Additionally, an encryption technique is dynamically selected for securing data transmission based on environmental security factors. Power consumption patterns of the computing device are analyzed to detect unauthorized background processes attempting to access the communication session.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
The summary above, as well as the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the present disclosure, exemplary constructions of the disclosure are shown in the drawings. However, the present disclosure is not limited to specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed herein. Moreover, those in the art will understand that the drawings are not to scale. Wherever possible, like elements have been indicated by identical numbers.
Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following diagrams wherein:
FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 for enabling secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 illustrates a sequence diagram for secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle through the system 100, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure; and
FIG. 4 illustrates the dynamic encryption key generation process for secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle through the system 100, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure.
In the accompanying drawings, an underlined number is employed to represent an item over which the underlined number is positioned or an item to which the underlined number is adjacent. A non-underlined number relates to an item identified by a line linking the non-underlined number to the item. When a number is non-underlined and accompanied by an associated arrow, the non-underlined number is used to identify a general item at which the arrow is pointing.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The following detailed description illustrates embodiments of the present disclosure and ways in which they can be implemented. Although some modes of carrying out the present disclosure have been disclosed, those skilled in the art would recognise that other embodiments for carrying out or practising the present disclosure are also possible.
The description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of certain embodiments of a system to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle and is not intended to represent the only forms which may be developed or utilised. The description sets forth the various structures and/or functions in connection with the illustrated embodiments; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the disclosure that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimised to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiment thereof has been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail below. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the disclosure is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the disclosure.
In the following detailed description of the embodiments of the disclosure, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, and which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the disclosure may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The following description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
The present disclosure will be described herein below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description, well known functions or constructions are not described in detail since they would obscure the description with unnecessary detail.
As used herein, the term "system" is used to refer to an arrangement of hardware and software components which collectively enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. The system performs authentication, encryption, intrusion detection, and security analysis to assure only authorized communication entities exchange data. The system operates within a computing environment which comprises secure transmission channels, cryptographic mechanisms, and real-time monitoring capabilities. The system may be implemented in various vehicular applications, comprising onboard security contexts, cloud-based infrastructures, or hybrid deployments which combine local and remote security management. The system facilitates controlled access to vehicle systems while preventing unauthorized entities from intercepting or modifying transmitted data. The system applies security plans and predefined communication parameters to detect anomalies, trigger appropriate responses, and prevent cyber threats.
As used herein, the term "processing unit" is used to refer to an electronic component which executes computer-executable instructions to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. The processing unit performs authentication procedures, encryption operations, intrusion detection, and security breach analysis. The processing unit may comprise a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or an application-specific integrated circuit capable of executing cryptographic computations. The processing unit interacts with other system components to implement access control measures, enforce security policies, and analyze real-time communication patterns. The processing unit validates authentication credentials, generates encryption keys, and detects unauthorized access attempts by comparing observed communication behaviors with predefined security parameters. The processing unit assures real-time security monitoring and decision-making are performed to mitigate cybersecurity risks.
As used herein, the term "memory" is used to refer to a storage component which retains computer-executable instructions, authentication credentials, cryptographic keys, and predefined security policies required for enabling secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. The memory is operatively coupled to the processing unit, allowing retrieval and execution of stored instructions to authenticate communication entities, generate encryption keys, and monitor communication patterns. The memory may comprise volatile storage for example random-access memory and non-volatile storage for example flash memory or solid-state drives. The memory contains data used for intrusion detection, security breach identification, and enforcement of access control measures. The memory also stores firmware updates, security patches, and cryptographic improvements which are periodically applied to counter emerging cybersecurity threats. The memory assures secure storage and retrieval of data are maintained to support reliable communication security operations. The memory provides structured data retention mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive security-related information.
As used herein, the term "digital certificate" is used to refer to an authentication credential which verifies the identity of a computing device and a vehicle before initiating a secure communication session. The digital certificate is issued by a trusted certification authority and comprises cryptographic elements for example a public key, certificate issuer details, expiration date, and cryptographic signatures. The digital certificate is used to validate the authenticity of communication entities and prevent unauthorized access. The digital certificate is exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle during the authentication process, allowing the system to confirm the legitimacy of communication requests. The digital certificate prevents impersonation attacks by assuring that only verified entities participate in communication sessions. The digital certificate may be stored securely within the computing device and the vehicle to prevent tampering, unauthorized modifications, or fraudulent use.
As used herein, the term "dynamic encryption key" is used to refer to a cryptographic key which is generated for each authenticated communication session to secure data transmission between a computing device and a vehicle. The dynamic encryption key is uniquely generated for every session to prevent key reuse and mitigate the risk of cryptographic attacks. The dynamic encryption key is used to encrypt and decrypt transmitted data, assuring that only authorized entities with valid authentication credentials can access secure communication content. The dynamic encryption key is derived based on cryptographic methods and predefined security policies. The dynamic encryption key may be generated using session-specific parameters, authentication tokens, or device-specific attributes to improve communication security. The dynamic encryption key is discarded after the termination of each communication session, assuring previously used keys cannot be exploited to decrypt intercepted data from previous transmissions. The dynamic encryption key prevents unauthorized access to secure communication channels.
As used herein, the term "communication patterns" is used to refer to structured sequences of interactions and data exchanges between a computing device and a vehicle during a communication session. Communication patterns comprise message transmission frequency, authentication handshake sequences, data packet structures, and encryption methods applied to transmitted information. Communication patterns are monitored in real time to detect deviations which indicate intrusion attempts, abnormal behaviors, or security threats. Communication patterns enable identification of unauthorized access attempts by comparing observed interactions with predefined secure communication parameters. Communication patterns facilitate the detection of compromised communication sessions by analyzing inconsistencies in expected data exchange behaviors. Communication patterns are used as a reference to initiate security responses, comprising blocking unauthorized access, terminating compromised sessions, and revalidating authentication credentials when suspicious activities are detected.
As used herein, the term "intrusion attempts" is used to refer to unauthorized actions aimed at gaining access to secure communication sessions between a computing device and a vehicle. Intrusion attempts comprise unauthorized login attempts, exploitation of security vulnerabilities, injection of malicious code, and attempts to access cryptographic keys or authentication credentials without authorization. Intrusion attempts are detected by monitoring communication patterns and identifying deviations from predefined security policies. Intrusion attempts may involve brute-force attacks, credential theft, unauthorized certificate usage, or impersonation of legitimate communication entities.
As used herein, the term "malware attack" is used to refer to a security threat in which malicious software compromises the integrity of a computing device engaged in a communication session with a vehicle. Malware attacks may involve unauthorized access, data manipulation, disruption of secure communication channels, or injection of harmful code into system memory. Malware attacks are detected through system integrity analysis, which identifies security breaches and vulnerabilities introduced by unauthorized software activity. Malware attacks may exploit weaknesses in authentication mechanisms, encryption methods, or access control policies to gain unauthorized control over communication sessions.
FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. The system 100 comprises a processing unit 102 to perform computational operations required for enabling secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle. The processing unit 102 is operatively coupled to a memory 104 and is responsible for executing computer-executable instructions which facilitate authentication, encryption, real-time monitoring, and security analysis. The processing unit 102 may comprise a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, or an application-specific integrated circuit capable of handling cryptographic computations and security-related tasks. The processing unit 102 interacts with various system components to validate digital certificates, generate encryption keys, analyze communication patterns, and detect security threats. The processing unit 102 may support real-time decision-making by evaluating communication activities and enforcing security measures based on predefined parameters. The processing unit 102 may execute predefined security policies stored within the memory 104 to detect anomalies and initiate corrective actions in response to cybersecurity threats. The processing unit 102 enables controlled access to vehicle systems while preventing unauthorized entities from intercepting or modifying transmitted data. The processing unit 102 may operate in various vehicular environments, comprising onboard vehicle networks, cloud-based infrastructures, or hybrid security contexts which integrate local and remote authentication mechanisms. The processing unit 102 may process authentication requests, verify cryptographic signatures, and trigger predefined security responses when unauthorized access attempts are detected.
In an embodiment, the memory 104 is operatively coupled to the processing unit 102 and stores computer-executable instructions which are executed by the processing unit 102 to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle. The memory 104 may comprise volatile and non-volatile storage components, for example random-access memory, flash memory, solid-state drives, or other persistent storage devices. The memory 104 retains authentication credentials, cryptographic keys, security policies, and predefined communication parameters required for intrusion detection and security enforcement. The memory 104 may store firmware updates, software patches, and cryptographic improvements which are periodically applied to counter emerging cybersecurity threats. The memory 104 provides structured data storage mechanisms to assure secure retrieval and execution of security-related operations. The memory 104 enables the storage and retrieval of encryption keys required for securing communication sessions, assuring that each session is protected against unauthorized access. The memory 104 may also maintain historical security logs, intrusion detection data, and authentication records for forensic analysis and system integrity verification. The memory 104 facilitates controlled access to stored security credentials, assuring that unauthorized modifications or access attempts are restricted based on predefined security parameters.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 executes instructions stored in the memory 104 to receive a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle, wherein the digital certificate serves as an authentication credential verifying an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session. The digital certificate is issued by a trusted certification authority and comprises cryptographic elements for example a public key, certificate issuer details, expiration date, and cryptographic signatures. The digital certificate is used to validate authenticity and prevent unauthorized access to communication sessions. The digital certificate is exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle during the authentication process, allowing the system 100 to confirm the legitimacy of communication requests. The digital certificate prevents impersonation attacks by assuring only verified entities participate in communication sessions. The digital certificate may be stored securely within the computing device and the vehicle to prevent unauthorized modifications or fraudulent certificate usage. The digital certificate is validated against predefined security policies stored in the memory 104, assuring that only authenticated devices are granted access to the communication session.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 executes instructions stored in the memory 104 to generate a dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session, wherein the dynamic encryption key is generated to prevent reuse of the key across multiple communication sessions. The dynamic encryption key is uniquely generated for every session to mitigate the risk of cryptographic attacks and unauthorized access. The dynamic encryption key is used to encrypt and decrypt transmitted data, assuring that only authorized entities with valid authentication credentials can access secure communication content. The dynamic encryption key is derived based on predefined cryptographic methods and security policies stored in the memory 104. The dynamic encryption key may be generated using session-specific parameters, authentication tokens, or device-specific attributes to improve communication security. The dynamic encryption key is discarded after the termination of each communication session, assuring that previously used keys cannot be exploited to decrypt intercepted data from previous transmissions. The dynamic encryption key prevents unauthorized access to secure communication channels by continuously generating unique encryption credentials for each session.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 executes instructions stored in the memory 104 to monitor communication patterns in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors, wherein deviations from predefined secure communication parameters trigger predefined security responses. Communication patterns comprise message transmission frequency, authentication handshake sequences, data packet structures, and encryption methods applied to transmitted information. Communication patterns are continuously analyzed to detect deviations which may indicate unauthorized access, security breaches, or malicious activities. Communication patterns are compared against stored security programs in the memory 104 to determine whether an authenticated communication session exhibits expected behavioral characteristics. Communication patterns are used as a basis for triggering security responses, comprising blocking unauthorized access, terminating compromised sessions, and initiating authentication revalidation.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 executes instructions stored in the memory 104 to analyze system 100 integrity in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session, wherein the analysis identifies security breaches and activates countermeasures to mitigate the detected malware attack while preserving confidentiality of data exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle. The system 100 performs continuous integrity checks to detect unauthorized modifications, malicious code injections, and security vulnerabilities introduced by unauthorized software activity. The system 100 compares system integrity parameters against predefined security baselines stored in the memory 104 to identify anomalies. The system 100 initiates countermeasures for example isolating compromised computing devices, revoking authentication credentials, and terminating affected communication sessions. The system 100 may deploy security updates, quarantine malicious software, and restrict unauthorized access attempts in response to detected malware attacks. The system 100 performs forensic analysis on compromised systems to identify attack vectors and improve security policies.
In an exemplary use case scenario, a vehicle owner attempts to establish a secure communication session between a smartphone and a vehicle for remote diagnostics and software updates. Upon initiating the connection, the processing unit 102 in the system 100 receives a digital certificate from the smartphone and the vehicle. The digital certificate, issued by a trusted certification authority, contains a public key, expiration date, and a cryptographic signature verifying an identity of both entities. The processing unit 102 validates the digital certificate against a stored authentication database in the memory 104 and proceeds with the session if the credentials match. A dynamic encryption key is then generated using a cryptographic method to assure that the encryption key is unique to the session. If the vehicle owner starts data transmission, the system 100 continuously monitors communication patterns, tracking message frequency, packet structures, and authentication handshakes. During the session, an intrusion attempt is detected when an unrecognized IP address attempts to intercept transmitted data. The processing unit 102 compares the detected behavior with predefined security parameters and immediately triggers a response by terminating the session and alerting the vehicle owner. Subsequently, an automated malware analysis is initiated when suspicious background activity is detected on the smartphone. The system 100 analyzes integrity logs and identifies an unauthorized application attempting to access stored authentication credentials. In response, the processing unit 102 isolates the compromised application, revokes active encryption keys, and prevents further unauthorized access while assuring that vehicle data remains confidential.
In an embodiment, the system 100 may comprise a physical pairing process, required between the computing device and the vehicle before enabling communication. The physical pairing process comprises an authentication step which mandates direct interaction between the computing device and the vehicle to establish a trusted communication channel. The physical pairing process involves secure key exchange mechanisms, wherein cryptographic credentials are generated and shared during the initial pairing sequence. The physical pairing process may require the user to authenticate the computing device through manual validation methods, comprising entering a unique passcode, scanning a QR code displayed on a vehicle interface, or using biometric authentication. The physical pairing process may utilize near-field communication, Bluetooth, or wired connections to establish an initial authentication handshake. The physical pairing process assures that unauthorized computing devices cannot gain access to the communication session without first undergoing direct verification. The physical pairing process prevents remote unauthorized access attempts by enforcing a requirement for proximity-based authentication. The physical pairing process may store pairing records within a secure memory location in the computing device and the vehicle, preventing unauthorized modification of pairing credentials. The physical pairing process may comprise session expiration parameters that require periodic re-authentication to maintain a secure connection between the computing device and the vehicle. The physical pairing process may incorporate additional security layers, comprising two-step verification or challenge-response authentication, to improve access control measures. The physical pairing process may trigger security alerts if an unrecognized computing device attempts to pair with the vehicle, preventing unauthorized access.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 may comprise multi-factor authentication mechanism to verify behavioral interaction patterns between the computing device and the vehicle before allowing access. The multi-factor authentication mechanism utilizes multiple authentication factors, comprising behavioral biometrics, device activity patterns, and contextual security parameters. The multi-factor authentication mechanism analyzes a device interaction frequency to determine whether communication behavior aligns with an expected access pattern. The multi-factor authentication mechanism examines keystroke dynamics by analyzing typing speed, pressure variations, and input sequences to distinguish between legitimate users and unauthorized entities. The multi-factor authentication mechanism utilizes gesture recognition, wherein movement patterns, touch pressure, and screen navigation behaviors are evaluated for authentication purposes. The multi-factor authentication mechanism monitors mouse movement characteristics, comprising cursor speed, click patterns, and interaction zones, to establish user identity verification. The multi-factor authentication mechanism analyzes navigation behavior within the computing device, comprising frequently accessed applications, browsing history, and input sequences, to detect anomalies. The multi-factor authentication mechanism dynamically adjusts security thresholds based on observed behavioral trends, assuring that only authorized computing devices gain access to the communication session. The multi-factor authentication mechanism continuously monitors authentication factors throughout an active session to detect unauthorized access attempts. The multi-factor authentication mechanism may require secondary authentication if deviations in behavioral interaction patterns are detected, preventing unauthorized access. The multi-factor authentication mechanism may integrate with an external authentication server to cross-verify behavioral metrics before granting access to the communication session. The multi-factor authentication mechanism may utilize historical authentication records to establish a behavioral profile for each authorized computing device, improving authentication accuracy. The multi-factor authentication mechanism may trigger security alerts if authentication parameters deviate from predefined security baselines, assuring that unauthorized computing devices are denied access.
In an embodiment, the vehicle may initiate a secure communication with the computing device under predefined conditions, comprising remote diagnostics and preventive maintenance. The vehicle determines predefined conditions based on operational status, system health, and detected fault conditions requiring remote assessment. The vehicle may transmit diagnostic data, sensor readings, and error logs to the computing device to facilitate remote troubleshooting. The vehicle may request security authentication before establishing communication, assuring that only authorized computing devices access diagnostic information. The vehicle may communicate with remote service centers, cloud-based diagnostic platforms, or authorized computing devices to receive maintenance recommendations. The vehicle may utilize encrypted transmission channels to prevent unauthorized interception of diagnostic data. The vehicle may dynamically adjust data transmission parameters based on network security policies, assuring that confidential information remains protected. The vehicle may initiate a communication session based on scheduled maintenance intervals, allowing computing devices to receive timely alerts regarding required servicing. The vehicle may continuously monitor system parameters and autonomously trigger a secure communication session if performance anomalies are detected. The vehicle may integrate with predictive maintenance systems that analyze operational data trends to determine when maintenance intervention is required. The vehicle may restrict access to specific vehicle subsystems during remote diagnostics to prevent unauthorized data modifications. The vehicle may incorporate user authorization controls which require manual approval before initiating a secure communication session with a computing device. The vehicle may generate security audit logs detailing communication interactions, authentication events, and transmitted data during remote diagnostics. The vehicle may implement session expiration policies which terminate a communication session after a predefined duration, preventing unauthorized extended access. The vehicle may prioritize diagnostic data transmission based on severity levels, assuring that imprtant faults receive immediate attention. The vehicle may integrate with vehicle management systems to provide real-time maintenance insights and improve overall security.
In an embodiment, the system 100 may provide customizable privacy settings to regulate access permissions of the computing device to specific vehicle systems. Customizable privacy settings define access levels for different computing devices based on authentication credentials and user-defined security policies. Customizable privacy settings may restrict access to certain vehicle elements, comprising navigation systems, infotainment controls, and onboard diagnostics, assuring that only authorized computing devices gain access. Customizable privacy settings may allow vehicle owners to establish role-based access permissions, defining different levels of system control for drivers, passengers, and maintenance personnel. Customizable privacy settings may comprise encryption policies which secure sensitive data exchanges between the computing device and the vehicle. Customizable privacy settings may provide granular control over data-sharing preferences, allowing users to enable or disable specific communication aspects. Customizable privacy settings may allow temporary access permissions for guest computing devices, assuring that access is granted for a limited duration. Customizable privacy settings may log access requests and authentication events to generate security audit reports. Customizable privacy settings may comprise biometric authentication requirements to improve access control measures. Customizable privacy settings may integrate with remote management platforms, allowing users to modify access permissions through a secure interface. Customizable privacy settings may dynamically adjust based on contextual factors, for example location, time of day, or driving conditions. Customizable privacy settings may enforce data anonymization policies to protect user-sensitive information during communication sessions. Customizable privacy settings may comprise compliance controls which assure adherence to regulatory security standards. Customizable privacy settings may generate security alerts if unauthorized attempts to modify access permissions are detected. Customizable privacy settings may implement session expiration policies, requiring periodic re-authentication to maintain secure access. Customizable privacy settings may restrict background data access, preventing unauthorized computing devices from retrieving stored vehicle information. Customizable privacy settings may enable the vehicle owner to selectively grant or revoke access permissions for different computing devices.
In an embodiment, the processing unit 102 may comprise an Over-The-Air (OTA) update mechanism to enable wireless delivery of security patches and software updates to the vehicle and the computing device. The OTA update mechanism facilitates remote installation of updates without requiring physical intervention, assuring that system vulnerabilities are addressed in a timely manner. The OTA update mechanism may authenticate an update package before installation by verifying cryptographic signatures, assuring that only authorized updates are applied. The OTA update mechanism may establish a secure communication session with a remote update server to retrieve necessary files while preventing unauthorized modifications. The OTA update mechanism may validate update integrity by performing hash verifications to detect corruption or tampering. The OTA update mechanism may schedule updates based on predefined system policies, allowing automatic installation during idle periods to prevent disruptions. The OTA update mechanism may provide rollback functionality, allowing the system to revert to a previous stable version if an update introduces unintended issues. The OTA update mechanism may comprise version control tracking, assuring that each computing device and vehicle component remains up to date with the latest security improvements. The OTA update mechanism may encrypt update transmissions to prevent unauthorized interception of software files. The OTA update mechanism may utilize incremental update deployment, minimizing bandwidth consumption by delivering only modified components instead of full system updates. The OTA update mechanism may notify users of pending updates, allowing manual approval before installation. The OTA update mechanism may integrate with diagnostic systems to assess compatibility before applying updates. The OTA update mechanism may store update logs for auditing purposes, tracking installation history and system modifications. The OTA update mechanism may prioritize important security patches over non-essential software updates to mitigate known vulnerabilities effectively. The OTA update mechanism may verify network integrity before initiating a download process, assuring that updates are retrieved securely.
In an embodiment, the system 100 may prioritization of OTA updates is performed based on the severity of detected intrusion attempts in the computing device and the vehicle. The prioritization process determines the urgency of security patches and applies updates accordingly to mitigate risks associated with ongoing cyber threats. The prioritization process may categorize updates into severity levels, comprising important, high, medium, and low, based on the impact on system security. The prioritization process may accelerate deployment of security patches addressing active intrusion attempts, assuring that vulnerabilities are mitigated before exploitation occurs. The prioritization process may delay non-essential updates until important security concerns are resolved, preventing resource allocation to less significant updates. The prioritization process may dynamically adjust update schedules based on detected security threats, assuring that emerging vulnerabilities receive immediate attention. The prioritization process may integrate with anomaly detection mechanisms, analyzing patterns of intrusion attempts to determine update urgency. The prioritization process may assess attack vectors exploited during security breaches to prioritize relevant patches. The prioritization process may perform risk assessments based on historical security logs, determining which updates are important to prevent reoccurrence of known threats. The prioritization process may trigger automated update installation when intrusion attempts exceed predefined security thresholds. The prioritization process may prevent unauthorized rollback to outdated software versions which reintroduce vulnerabilities. The prioritization process may enforce mandatory update policies for important patches, preventing system exposure to unpatched security risks. The prioritization process may generate update reports, detailing applied patches and their corresponding threat mitigation impact. The prioritization process may incorporate real-time monitoring, adjusting update urgency based on evolving security threats. The prioritization process may notify system administrators of important updates requiring immediate action. The prioritization process may utilize predictive threat analysis to determine future update priorities based on identified attack trends.
In an embodiment, the system 100 may comprise an emergency access mechanism to enable authorized personnel to securely access specific vehicle systems under predefined emergency conditions. The emergency access mechanism grants temporary access permissions to authorized entities, assuring that important interventions can be performed when required. The emergency access mechanism may activate upon detecting specific emergency events, comprising vehicle malfunctions, driver incapacitation, or security breaches. The emergency access mechanism may validate authorized personnel through multi-factor authentication, preventing unauthorized activation. The emergency access mechanism may integrate with law enforcement or emergency response systems, allowing authorized agencies to access vehicle data when necessary. The emergency access mechanism may impose restrictions on accessible systems, assuring that only predefined functions can be controlled under emergency conditions. The emergency access mechanism may generate security logs detailing access events, preventing misuse or unauthorized exploitation. The emergency access mechanism may comprise session expiration policies, automatically revoking access after the emergency condition is resolved. The emergency access mechanism may utilize biometric authentication for verification of authorized personnel. The emergency access mechanism may enforce encryption during emergency access sessions, assuring data confidentiality. The emergency access mechanism may initiate a secure connection with remote monitoring centers for real-time status updates. The emergency access mechanism may incorporate role-based permissions, allowing different levels of access based on the assigned authority of the requesting personnel. The emergency access mechanism may restrict modification of important security settings to prevent unauthorized changes. The emergency access mechanism may utilize time-sensitive access codes which expire upon completion of an emergency event. The emergency access mechanism may trigger security alerts if unauthorized attempts to invoke emergency access are detected. The emergency access mechanism may integrate with vehicle telematics systems to provide location-based access control. The emergency access mechanism may assure that access logs are securely stored for post-incident review and compliance verification.
In an embodiment, the system 100 may apply an adaptive security response mechanism to adjust encryption strength based on communication risk levels detected during active sessions. The adaptive security response mechanism evaluates communication patterns, intrusion attempts, and environmental security factors to determine appropriate encryption parameters. The adaptive security response mechanism may increase encryption strength when abnormal communication patterns indicate security threats. The adaptive security response mechanism may dynamically switch encryption methods based on risk assessments, assuring that sensitive data remains protected under varying conditions. The adaptive security response mechanism may reduce encryption complexity during low-risk communication to optimize system performance. The adaptive security response mechanism may analyze real-time authentication patterns, adjusting security measures based on user interaction trends. The adaptive security response mechanism may integrate with intrusion detection systems to enforce stricter encryption policies when threats are detected. The adaptive security response mechanism may utilize historical security logs to refine encryption approaches, adapting based on previously identified vulnerabilities. The adaptive security response mechanism may enforce stronger encryption during remote communication sessions to prevent unauthorized interception. The adaptive security response mechanism may trigger additional authentication requirements when risk levels exceed predefined security thresholds. The adaptive security response mechanism may restrict access to specific vehicle subsystems when security concerns are detected. The adaptive security response mechanism may implement periodic key regeneration to mitigate risks associated with prolonged encryption key usage. The adaptive security response mechanism may integrate with anomaly detection systems, assuring that emerging threats trigger appropriate encryption adjustments. The adaptive security response mechanism may enforce encryption downgrades for computing devices with limited processing capabilities to maintain compatibility. The adaptive security response mechanism may generate security reports documenting encryption strength variations and their impact on communication security. The adaptive security response mechanism may dynamically enforce security policies based on detected risk levels, preventing unauthorized access while optimizing data transmission efficiency. The adaptive security response mechanism may integrate with predictive threat models to anticipate future security risks and adjust encryption approaches accordingly.
FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 for enabling secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. At step 202, the processing unit 102 receives a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle, wherein the digital certificate serves as an authentication credential which verifies an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session. The digital certificate is issued by a trusted certification authority and contains cryptographic elements, comprising a public key, certificate issuer details, an expiration date, and a cryptographic signature. The digital certificate is transmitted through a secure communication channel to prevent unauthorized interception or modification and is validated against predefined authentication parameters stored in the memory 104. At step 204, the processing unit 102 generates a dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session to secure transmitted data between the computing device and the vehicle, wherein the dynamic encryption key is uniquely generated for every session to prevent key reuse across multiple communication sessions, mitigating cryptographic vulnerabilities and unauthorized decryption attempts. The dynamic encryption key is derived using predefined cryptographic methods stored in the memory 104 and may be based on session-specific parameters, authentication tokens, or device-specific attributes to improve security. The dynamic encryption key is securely exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle through an encrypted channel and is discarded after the termination of each communication session to prevent unauthorized decryption of intercepted data. At step 206, the processing unit 102 monitors communication patterns in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors, wherein the communication patterns comprise message transmission frequency, authentication handshake sequences, data packet structures, and encryption methods applied to transmitted information. The communication patterns are continuously compared against predefined secure communication parameters stored in the memory 104 to identify deviations which may indicate unauthorized access attempts, security breaches, or malicious activities. The communication patterns trigger predefined security responses when anomalies are detected, comprising blocking unauthorized access, terminating compromised sessions, or enforcing multi-factor authentication. At step 208, the processing unit 102 analyzes system 100 integrity in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session, wherein the system 100 performs integrity verification checks to detect unauthorized modifications, malicious code injections, or other security breaches which may compromise data confidentiality. The system 100 compares current system integrity parameters against predefined security baselines stored in the memory 104 and activates countermeasures in response to detected malware attacks, comprising isolating compromised computing devices, revoking authentication credentials, terminating affected communication sessions, and deploying security patches to mitigate ongoing security threats. The system 100 generates security audit logs documenting detected malware activity, response actions, and identified vulnerabilities for forensic analysis while assuring continuous monitoring and enforcement of necessary security countermeasures.
In an embodiment, the encryption key generation parameters may be modified based on a computational capability of the computing device to optimize encryption processes and assure efficient resource utilization. Encryption key generation parameters comprise key length, cryptographic complexity, and processing overhead, which may be adjusted dynamically based on available processing power and memory resources of the computing device. A computing device with high computational capability may generate encryption keys with longer bit lengths and higher complexity to improve security, while a computing device with limited processing resources may use optimized key generation methods to maintain encryption strength while minimizing processing delays. Encryption key generation parameters may be determined based on hardware specifications, comprising processor speed, available memory, and cryptographic processing capabilities of the computing device. Encryption key generation parameters may also be influenced by system load conditions, assuring that encryption operations do not interfere with other computing processes. Encryption key generation parameters may be adjusted in real-time during active communication sessions, allowing the computing device to balance security requirements with computational efficiency. Encryption key generation parameters may be stored in a memory 104 and retrieved during key initialization to assure compatibility with predefined security policies. Encryption key generation parameters may be periodically updated through software patches to address evolving security threats and maintain encryption robustness. Encryption key generation parameters may be analyzed to detect anomalies which indicate unauthorized tampering with encryption processes, preventing security breaches.
In an embodiment, a dual-channel authentication process may be initiated, wherein the dual-channel authentication process requires simultaneous verification from an external security server and the vehicle before establishing a communication session with the computing device. The dual-channel authentication process strengthens security by requiring authentication from two independent verification sources, reducing the risk of unauthorized access. The external security server validates authentication credentials associated with the computing device and transmits an authentication approval to the vehicle. The vehicle independently verifies identity parameters stored locally, assuring that authentication requests originate from legitimate sources. The dual-channel authentication process may comprise cryptographic challenge-response verification, wherein authentication tokens generated by the external security server must match expected credentials stored within the vehicle. The dual-channel authentication process improves resistance to credential spoofing attacks by preventing unauthorized computing devices from accessing communication sessions without approval from both authentication entities. The dual-channel authentication process may comprise a time-sensitive verification mechanism, assuring that authentication responses are received within a predefined time window to prevent replay attacks. The dual-channel authentication process may be implemented using secure communication channels, preventing unauthorized interception of authentication data. The dual-channel authentication process may store authentication logs within a secure storage location for audit and compliance purposes, allowing for verification of authentication events. The dual-channel authentication process may require re-authentication at periodic intervals to maintain session integrity and prevent unauthorized access attempts.
In an embodiment, an access duration token may be generated, wherein the access duration token defines a predetermined session expiration time based on a risk assessment to regulate communication access between the computing device and the vehicle. The access duration token specifies a maximum allowable duration for an authenticated communication session, assuring that access is automatically terminated upon expiration. The access duration token may be generated based on a security risk level associated with the computing device, wherein devices exhibiting higher security risks are granted shorter session durations. The access duration token may be dynamically adjusted based on user activity, environmental conditions, and historical authentication trends. The access duration token may integrate with multi-factor authentication mechanisms, requiring re-authentication before extending an active communication session. The access duration token may comprise a session renewal parameter, allowing authorized computing devices to request an extension of the communication session within predefined security constraints. The access duration token may be encrypted and securely stored within a memory 104, preventing unauthorized modifications. The access duration token may be transmitted through a secure channel to prevent tampering and interception by unauthorized entities. The access duration token may be revoked in response to detected security threats, immediately terminating an active session to prevent further unauthorized access. The access duration token may generate session expiration alerts, notifying users before session termination to prevent unexpected communication disruptions. The access duration token may be integrated with access logs, enabling administrators to review historical session durations and associated security events.
In an embodiment, the security threats may be detected in communication patterns which are prioritized based on a type of intrusion attempt to facilitate efficient threat mitigation policies. Communication patterns are analyzed in real time to identify unauthorized access attempts, abnormal behavior, and deviations from predefined secure communication parameters. Intrusion attempts are categorized based on risk severity, allowing security responses to be prioritized accordingly. Brute-force attacks involving repeated authentication failures may trigger immediate account lockout mechanisms, preventing further unauthorized access attempts. Man-in-the-middle attacks, wherein communication data is intercepted and manipulated, may result in session termination and key regeneration to restore communication integrity. Unauthorized data injection attempts detected within communication patterns may trigger packet filtering and anomaly-based intrusion detection mechanisms to prevent malicious payload execution. The prioritization of security threats may consider contextual risk factors, comprising the source of the intrusion attempt, historical attack patterns, and the sensitivity of transmitted data. Security threats exhibiting high-risk characteristics may be escalated for immediate intervention, while lower-risk anomalies may undergo further validation before triggering security responses. Security threat prioritization may be logged in a secure storage location, allowing security administrators to analyze intrusion patterns and refine threat mitigation policies. Security threat prioritization may be dynamically adjusted based on evolving attack methodologies, assuring that security measures remain responsive to emerging cyber threats.
In an embodiment, an encryption technique may be dynamically selected for securing data transmission based on environmental security factors, assuring optimal protection against security threats. Environmental security factors influencing encryption selection may comprise network conditions, communication latency, and the presence of known security vulnerabilities. An encryption technique providing stronger security may be selected in high-risk environments, for example public networks with eavesdropping threats. The encryption technique offering faster performance may be used in low-risk environments where secure communication must be maintained with minimal computational overhead. The encryption technique may be dynamically adjusted based on historical attack patterns, assuring that encryption methods remain resilient against evolving security threats. The encryption technique may be selected based on hardware capabilities of the computing device, allowing encryption parameters to be optimized for available processing resources. The encryption technique may be periodically evaluated to determine effectiveness, with weaker encryption mechanisms being replaced with stronger alternatives when necessary.
In an embodiment, the consumption patterns of the computing device may be analysed to detect unauthorized background processes attempting to access the communication session. Power consumption patterns may be monitored in real time to identify deviations from expected energy usage, indicating security threats. Unauthorized background processes attempting to execute without user consent may exhibit abnormal power usage signatures, triggering security alerts. Power consumption patterns may be analyzed alongside communication activity logs to determine whether unauthorized access attempts coincide with unusual energy consumption. Power consumption analysis may be integrated with intrusion detection mechanisms to automatically restrict unauthorized background processes from interacting with the communication session. Power consumption anomalies may indicate the presence of malware or spyware attempting to intercept transmitted data, prompting immediate security intervention. Power consumption analysis may consider environmental factors, for example battery health and system load, to differentiate between legitimate power fluctuations and unauthorized process execution. Power consumption patterns may be logged in a secure memory location, allowing forensic analysis of historical security incidents.
In an embodiment, the system 100 enables secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle by utilizing the processing unit 102 and the memory 104. The processing unit 102 executes computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 104 to authenticate communication entities, encrypt transmitted data, monitor communication patterns, and analyze system 100 integrity. The processing unit 102 receives a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle, verifying an identity of both entities before establishing a communication session. A dynamic encryption key is generated for each authenticated session to prevent key reuse across multiple communication sessions, reducing vulnerability to cryptographic attacks. Communication patterns are continuously monitored in real time to detect intrusion attempts and abnormal behaviors. Deviations from predefined secure communication parameters trigger predefined security responses, preventing unauthorized access. System 100 integrity is analyzed when a malware attack is detected on the computing device, identifying security breaches and activating countermeasures to mitigate risks while preserving data confidentiality.
In an embodiment, a physical pairing process between the computing device and the vehicle is required before enabling communication, wherein an authentication step mandates direct interaction between both entities to establish a trusted communication channel. The physical pairing process involves generating a secure authentication token which is exchanged only through a proximity-based method, for example Bluetooth pairing, NFC scanning, or wired authentication. The physical pairing process prevents remote unauthorized access by enforcing direct user involvement in the authentication step. The physical pairing process assures that only verified computing devices can initiate a communication session with the vehicle, preventing external entities from intercepting authentication credentials. The physical pairing process may require periodic revalidation to maintain a secure link between the computing device and the vehicle. The physical pairing process restricts unauthorized devices from establishing communication, mitigating risks of man-in-the-middle attacks. The physical pairing process enables a controlled authentication sequence, assuring that communication is established within a verified and trusted frame.
In an embodiment, a multi-factor authentication mechanism is implemented by the processing unit 102 to verify behavioral interaction patterns between a computing device and a vehicle before allowing access. The multi-factor authentication mechanism analyzes a device interaction frequency to detect anomalies in user behavior. Keystroke dynamics, comprising typing speed and input sequences, are examined to validate identity. Gesture recognition is used to track touch input patterns and navigation preferences within a computing device. Mouse movement characteristics, comprising cursor speed and interaction patterns, are monitored to establish authentication accuracy. Navigation behavior within the computing device is analyzed to detect unauthorized usage attempts. The multi-factor authentication mechanism continuously evaluates behavioral metrics to verify whether an access request is legitimate. If deviations are detected in authentication patterns, additional verification steps may be required before granting access. The multi-factor authentication mechanism improves security by preventing unauthorized computing devices from accessing vehicle communication systems based solely on static credentials.
In an embodiment, the vehicle initiates a secure communication session with the computing device under predefined conditions, comprising remote diagnostics and preventive maintenance. The vehicle transmits diagnostic data to the computing device to facilitate troubleshooting of detected faults. The vehicle may determine predefined conditions based on operational anomalies, system health metrics, or scheduled maintenance intervals. The vehicle restricts communication access to authorized computing devices to prevent unauthorized data retrieval. The vehicle may transmit encrypted data logs to a remote service center for analysis. The vehicle autonomously identifies issues and establishes a communication session with an authenticated computing device to receive updates or diagnostics feedback. The vehicle prevents unauthorized modifications to transmitted data by enforcing security measures during the communication session. The vehicle dynamically adjusts data transmission parameters based on security requirements. The vehicle generates access control logs to document remote diagnostic sessions. The vehicle may restrict communication characteristics based on detected threats, assuring data security during maintenance operations.
In an embodiment, customizable privacy settings are provided to regulate access permissions of the computing device to specific vehicle systems. Customizable privacy settings define access levels based on authentication credentials and user-defined policies. Customizable privacy settings prevent unauthorized computing devices from accessing sensitive vehicle functionalities. Customizable privacy settings allow users to selectively enable or disable communication privileges for different computing devices. Customizable privacy settings may comprise encryption policies for securing data exchanges between a computing device and the vehicle. Customizable privacy settings support role-based access control, allowing vehicle owners to define permissions for drivers, passengers, and maintenance personnel. Customizable privacy settings enable temporary access restrictions based on contextual factors for example location or time of day. Customizable privacy settings generate security logs documenting access modifications and authentication events. Customizable privacy settings enforce security compliance requirements by restricting data access according to predefined policies. Customizable privacy settings allow granular control over vehicle communication systems to protect user privacy.
In an embodiment, an OTA update mechanism is incorporated within the processing unit 102 to enable wireless delivery of security patches and software updates to the vehicle and the computing device. The OTA update mechanism transmits updates securely over an encrypted communication channel to prevent unauthorized modifications during data transfer. The OTA update mechanism verifies update integrity before installation, assuring that only authenticated software versions are deployed. The OTA update mechanism may operate in scheduled intervals or on-demand based on security requirements. The OTA update mechanism stores a backup of the previous software version to enable rollback in case of update failures. The OTA update mechanism dynamically adjusts bandwidth allocation to minimize disruption during the update process. The OTA update mechanism prevents unauthorized entities from injecting malicious software by validating digital signatures of update packages. The OTA update mechanism enforces update prioritization policies to apply important security patches before non-essential characteristic updates.
In an embodiment, prioritization of OTA updates is performed based on the severity of detected intrusion attempts in the computing device and the vehicle. Intrusion attempts are analyzed to determine threat levels, assuring that security-important updates receive priority over non-important software patches. The prioritization process evaluates system vulnerability levels and applies security patches accordingly. Updates addressing known exploits are prioritized to prevent further exposure to security threats. The prioritization process may adjust update schedules based on detected anomalies in communication patterns. The prioritization mechanism assures that high-risk vulnerabilities are patched immediately, reducing exposure to cyberattacks. The prioritization mechanism restricts update deployment to authorized computing devices, preventing unauthorized installations. The prioritization mechanism logs update activities to track applied security patches and intrusion detection events. The prioritization process dynamically adapts based on evolving security threats, assuring timely deployment of important updates. The prioritization mechanism maintains system integrity by preventing delays in applying important security patches.
In an embodiment, an emergency access mechanism enables authorized personnel to securely access specific vehicle systems under predefined emergency conditions. The emergency access mechanism verifies authorization credentials before granting access to restricted vehicle functionalities. The emergency access mechanism allows predefined personnel, for example law enforcement or emergency responders, to override standard access restrictions. The emergency access mechanism is activated through secure authentication methods, comprising biometric verification or time-sensitive access codes. The emergency access mechanism restricts access duration to prevent unauthorized prolonged use. The emergency access mechanism generates access logs to document authentication events during emergency overrides. The emergency access mechanism prevents unauthorized activation by enforcing multi-step authentication procedures. The emergency access mechanism restricts data exposure to only necessary vehicle functionalities, preventing security risks. The emergency access mechanism allows remote authentication approvals from trusted entities to facilitate access control. The emergency access mechanism dynamically adjusts access permissions based on emergency severity levels.
In an embodiment, an adaptive security response mechanism adjusts an encryption strength based on communication risk levels detected during active sessions. The adaptive security response mechanism continuously monitors risk factors for example unusual authentication attempts, unexpected data exchange patterns, and deviations from predefined secure communication parameters. The adaptive security response mechanism increases encryption complexity in response to high-risk conditions, for example access from an unrecognized computing device or a detected intrusion attempt. The adaptive security response mechanism may reduce encryption overhead when communication occurs within a low-risk environment, optimizing computational efficiency without compromising security. The adaptive security response mechanism dynamically modifies encryption protocols to respond to emerging cybersecurity threats. The adaptive security response mechanism may trigger additional authentication verification steps when high-risk activity is detected. The adaptive security response mechanism restricts access to sensitive vehicle systems based on security risk evaluations. The adaptive security response mechanism logs security adjustments for forensic analysis and compliance verification.
In an embodiment, encryption key generation parameters are modified based on a computational capability of the computing device to optimize encryption performance while maintaining data security. The encryption key generation process dynamically selects key lengths and cryptographic processing methods based on available computing resources. The encryption key generation process reduces computational load for low-power devices while maintaining encryption integrity. The encryption key generation process allows high-performance computing devices to utilize stronger encryption methods without causing processing delays. The encryption key generation process evaluates processor speed, available memory, and power consumption before determining appropriate encryption parameters. The encryption key generation process dynamically adapts to changing system conditions, assuring consistent security levels across different computing environments. The encryption key generation process prevents performance degradation by balancing security requirements with system limitations. The encryption key generation process may integrate with hardware security modules to improve encryption capabilities. The encryption key generation process maintains compatibility with predefined security policies while optimizing encryption efficiency.
In an embodiment, a dual-channel authentication process is initiated which requires simultaneous verification from an external security server and the vehicle before granting access to the computing device. The dual-channel authentication process improves security by requiring independent verification from multiple sources. The dual-channel authentication process validates authentication credentials against a centralized security database while assuring that the computing device meets predefined authentication criteria stored in the vehicle. The dual-channel authentication process prevents unauthorized access by assuring that authentication tokens from both channels match expected values. The dual-channel authentication process mitigates risks associated with single-point authentication failures by requiring confirmation from two separate entities. The dual-channel authentication process prevents impersonation attacks by enforcing multi-source verification. The dual-channel authentication process integrates with cryptographic security mechanisms to protect authentication data from interception. The dual-channel authentication process generates authentication logs for tracking access events. The dual-channel authentication process dynamically adjusts authentication policies based on detected security threats.
In an embodiment, an access duration token is generated which defines a predetermined session expiration time based on a risk assessment. The access duration token regulates communication session lengths based on security risk factors, assuring that unauthorized access is automatically revoked upon session expiration. The access duration token may assign shorter session durations to high-risk computing devices while allowing extended sessions for trusted entities. The access duration token requires re-authentication when the session time limit is reached to maintain secure access. The access duration token prevents unauthorized persistent connections by enforcing session timeout policies. The access duration token dynamically adjusts expiration times based on observed communication patterns and detected security threats. The access duration token may integrate with multi-factor authentication methods to extend or restrict session access based on risk analysis. The access duration token generates access logs to track session expiration events. The access duration token restricts access renewal privileges to authenticated users with valid security credentials.
In an embodiment, security threats detected in communication patterns are prioritized based on a type of intrusion attempt to facilitate efficient threat mitigation. Communication patterns are continuously monitored to identify unauthorized access attempts, abnormal data exchanges, and deviations from predefined security protocols. Security threats are categorized based on severity, allowing immediate responses to high-risk attacks for example brute-force login attempts and unauthorized data modifications. Security threat prioritization assigns higher importance to intrusion attempts involving credential theft, network spoofing, and unauthorized system access. Security threat prioritization determines whether an identified security event requires immediate action, extended monitoring, or additional verification. Security threat prioritization dynamically adjusts based on evolving attack methodologies, assuring that high-risk threats receive immediate intervention. Security threat prioritization integrates with intrusion detection systems to automate response actions. Security threat prioritization generates security logs documenting detected threats and corresponding mitigation actions. Security threat prioritization prevents delayed security responses by classifying threats based on their impact on system integrity.
In an embodiment, an encryption technique is dynamically selected for securing data transmission based on environmental security factors to maintain communication confidentiality. The encryption technique selection process considers network conditions, eavesdropping risks, and system processing capabilities before applying encryption measures. The encryption technique selection process improves security by adjusting cryptographic complexity based on detected threats. The encryption technique selection process applies stronger encryption when communication occurs in unsecured environments for example public networks. The encryption technique selection process reduces encryption overhead in trusted environments to optimize system performance without compromising data integrity. The encryption technique selection process dynamically modifies encryption policies to respond to changing security conditions. The encryption technique selection process prevents unauthorized decryption attempts by assuring that encryption methods remain unpredictable. The encryption technique selection process may integrate with secure key exchange mechanisms to protect encryption parameters. The encryption technique selection process generates logs documenting encryption modifications for security audits.
In an embodiment, power consumption patterns of the computing device are analyzed to detect unauthorized background processes attempting to access a communication session. Power consumption analysis identifies unexpected fluctuations in energy usage which may indicate unauthorized software activity. Power consumption monitoring detects hidden malware or spyware attempting to intercept transmitted data. Power consumption patterns are compared against historical usage trends to differentiate between legitimate system processes and unauthorized background activity. Power consumption anomalies trigger security alerts and automated mitigation responses. Power consumption analysis integrates with intrusion detection systems to prevent unauthorized access attempts. Power consumption monitoring may restrict background applications from accessing sensitive communication channels. Power consumption tracking generates security logs to document detected anomalies and corresponding response actions. Power consumption-based security analysis prevents unauthorized applications from compromising encryption processes or intercepting authentication credentials. Power consumption monitoring dynamically adapts to device activity, assuring accurate detection of unauthorized background processes attempting to manipulate communication sessions.
FIG. 3 illustrates a sequence diagram for secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle through the system 100, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Initially, the computing device transmits a digital certificate to the vehicle, which forwards the digital certificate to system 100 for authentication. The processing unit 102 within system 100 validates the certificate by retrieving authentication data from memory 104. Upon successful verification, system 100 confirms authentication to the computing device. Following authentication, the processing unit 102 generates a dynamic encryption key for the session, storing the dynamic encryption key in memory 104 to prevent key reuse. Once communication is initiated, the computing device and vehicle exchange encrypted data while system 100 monitors real-time communication patterns for intrusion attempts. If anomalies are detected, predefined security responses are triggered. Additionally, the processing unit 102 analyzes system integrity by retrieving security logs from memory 104 to detect malware attacks on the computing device. If a malware threat is identified, countermeasures are activated, comprising terminating the secure session and notifying the computing device and vehicle of the detected risk.
FIG. 4 illustrates the dynamic encryption key generation process for secure communication between the computing device and the vehicle through the system 100, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. The dynamic encryption key generation process begins when authentication approval is received following a successful verification of the computing device and the vehicle. Once authentication is confirmed, a unique encryption key is generated by deriving the unique encryption key from session-specific parameters for example timestamp, device identity, and cryptographic attributes. The generated encryption key is securely stored in a memory location to assure restricted access. The encryption key is then used to encrypt data before transmission to the vehicle, preventing unauthorized interception. During the active session, system 100 continuously monitors key usage to detect anomalies and prevent key misuse. If the session remains active, the encryption key continues securing data exchanges. Once the session terminates, the encryption key is discarded to eliminate risks associated with key reuse.
In the description of the present invention, it is also to be noted that, unless otherwise explicitly specified or limited, the terms “disposed,” “mounted,” and “connected” are to be construed broadly, and may for example be fixedly connected, detachably connected, or integrally connected, either mechanically or electrically. They may be connected directly or indirectly through intervening media, or they may be interconnected between two elements. The specific meaning of the above terms in the present invention can be understood in specific cases to those skilled in the art.
Modifications to embodiments and combination of different embodiments of the present disclosure described in the foregoing are possible without departing from the scope of the present disclosure as defined by the accompanying claims. Expressions such as “comprising”, “comprising”, “incorporating”, “have”, “is” used to describe and claim the present disclosure are intended to be construed in a non- exclusive manner, namely allowing for items, components or elements not explicitly described also to be present. Reference to the singular is also to be construed to relate to the plural where appropriate.
Although embodiments have been described with reference to a number of illustrative embodiments thereof, it should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art that will fall within the spirit and scope of the principles of this disclosure. More particularly, various variations and modifications are possible in the component parts and/or arrangements of the subject combination arrangement within the scope of the present disclosure, the drawings and the appended claims. In addition to variations and modifications in the component parts and/or arrangements, alternative uses will also be apparent to those skilled in the art.
,CLAIMS:WE CLAIM:
1. A system 100 to enable secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle, the system 100 comprising:
a processing unit 102;
a memory 104 operatively coupled to the processing unit 102, the memory 104 storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processing unit 102, cause the system 100 to:
receive a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle, wherein the digital certificate serves as an authentication credential verifying an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session;
generate a dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session, wherein the dynamic encryption key is generated to prevent reuse of the key, across the multiple communication sessions;
monitor the communication patterns in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect the intrusion attempts and the abnormal behaviors, wherein the deviations from the predefined secure communication parameters trigger the predefined security responses; and
analyze system 100 integrity in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session, wherein the analysis identifies the security breaches and activates the countermeasures to mitigate the detected malware attack, while preserving confidentiality of data exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle.
2. The system 100 of claim 1, wherein a physical pairing process between the computing device and the vehicle is required before enabling communication, wherein the physical pairing process comprises an authentication step to mandate direct interaction between the computing device and the vehicle to establish a trusted communication channel.
3. The system 100 of claim 1, wherein a multi-factor authentication mechanism is implemented by the processing unit 102, wherein the multi-factor authentication mechanism verifies the behavioral interaction patterns between the computing device and the vehicle before allowing access, wherein the behavioral interaction patterns comprise a device interaction frequency, the keystroke dynamics, a gesture recognition, the mouse movement characteristics, and a navigation behavior within the computing device.
4. The system 100 of claim 1, wherein the vehicle is configured to initiate a secure communication with the computing device under the predefined conditions, comprising the remote diagnostics and preventive maintenance.
5. The system 100 of claim 1, wherein the customizable privacy settings are provided to regulate the access permissions of the computing device to the specific vehicle systems.
6. The system 100 of claim 1, further comprises an Over-The-Air (OTA) update mechanism that is incorporated within the processing unit 102, wherein the OTA update mechanism enables wireless delivery of the security patches and the software updates to the vehicle and the computing device.
7. The system 100 of claim 6, wherein prioritization of OTA updates is performed based on the severity of the detected intrusion attempts in the computing device and the vehicle.
8. The system 100 of claim 1, further comprises an emergency access mechanism that is provided to enable authorized personnel to securely access the specific vehicle systems under the predefined emergency conditions.
9. The system 100 of claim 1, further comprises an adaptive security response mechanism that adjusts an encryption strength based on the communication risk levels detected during the active sessions.
10. A method 200 for enabling secure communication between a computing device and a vehicle, the method 200 comprising:
receiving, by a processing unit 102, a digital certificate from the computing device and the vehicle, wherein the digital certificate serves as an authentication credential verifying an identity of the computing device and the vehicle before establishing a communication session;
generating, by the processing unit 102, a dynamic encryption key corresponding to each authenticated communication session, wherein the dynamic encryption key is generated to prevent key reuse across multiple communication sessions;
monitoring, by the processing unit 102, the communication patterns in real time during each authenticated communication session to detect the intrusion attempts and the abnormal behaviors, wherein the deviations from the predefined secure communication parameters trigger the predefined security responses; and
analyzing, by the processing unit 102, system 100 integrity in response to a detected malware attack on the computing device during an authenticated communication session, wherein the analysis identifies the security breaches and activates the countermeasures to mitigate the detected malware attack while preserving confidentiality of data exchanged between the computing device and the vehicle.
11. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising modifying the encryption key generation parameters based on computational capability of the computing device.
12. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising initiating a dual-channel authentication process that requires simultaneous verification from an external security server and the vehicle.
13. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising generating an access duration token that defines a pre-determined session expiration time based on a risk assessment.
14. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising the prioritizing security threats detected in the communication patterns based on a type of intrusion attempt.
15. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising dynamically selecting an encryption algorithm for securing data transmission based on the environmental security factors.
16. The method 200 of claim 1, further comprising analyzing the power consumption patterns of the computing device to detect the unauthorized background processes attempting to access the communication session.