Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Flash Chain: An Adaptive Streaming Analytics Framework For Real Time Ai Driven Fraud Detection In Blockchain Transactions With Sub Second Latency

Abstract: Abstract Flash-Chain is a new form of real-time fraud detection mechanism that is specifically aimed for blockchain transactions with subsecond latency rate. As a result, FLASH-CHAIN incorporates adaptive streaming analytics with the help of AI and machine learning that revealed and prevent fraud transactions in real-time as well. This incorporates several diverse machine learning approaches and can recognize and learn about new fraud types on the fly and new kinds of attacks as well. In contrast to other fraud detection systems which test for anomaly at set time intervals or use pre-built models, FLASH-CHAIN enables immediate real-time detection of misconducts hence increases security in blockchain networks as well as for other users. When it comes to high-frequency blockchain applications, such as cryptocurrency trading, DeFi platforms or supply chain management, FLASH-CHAIN’s performance of processing multiple transactions in real-time without affect the speed or accuracy is beneficial. The data analyzed by the system is the basis for the model, which is built on an artificial intelligence; not only it can detect fraud, but, as every AI engine, becomes more efficient with time. As for the method that allows for its proactive application, FLASH-CHAIN considers the high requirement of fraud defense mechanisms in today’s blockchain environment and simultaneously provides the necessary speed and adaptability to execute transactions on decentralized platforms. Keywords: Real-time Fraud Detection, Blockchain Transactions, Adaptive Streaming Analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Sub-Second Latency

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
31 March 2025
Publication Number
15/2025
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMMUNICATION
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

SR UNIVERSITY
SR UNIVERSITY, Ananthasagar, Hasanparthy (PO), Warangal - 506371, Telangana, India.

Inventors

1. Votte Rajashekhar
Research Scholar, School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Ananthasagar, Hasanparthy (P.O), Warangal, Telangana-506371, India.
2. Dr. Mohammed Ali Shaik
Associate Professor, School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, SR University, Ananthasagar, Hasanparthy (P.O), Warangal, Telangana-506371, India.

Specification

Description:FLASH-CHAIN: An Adaptive Streaming Analytics Framework for Real-Time AI-Driven Fraud Detection in Blockchain Transactions with Sub-Second Latency

2. Problem Statement:
Due to technological advancements, various industries face the most impact since blockchain technology offers unarguably the best way to record various transactions. However, worth noting is the fact that the more blockchain is put into use, the more it becomes a target for fraudulent actions like Double spending, Identity theft and even cyberattacks. Although, Blockchain possesses problems of cryptographic security which are inherent to its structure, this system is also vulnerable to such attacks with the increasing number of transactions and their complexity.

Challenges that are experienced in analyzing blockchain transactions for fraud include; Current challenges of blocking numerous transactions as data is processed in real-time. The legacy fraud detection models are not fitted for real-time analysis and have static nature where alerts are generated by batch and/or rule-based algorithms. This leads to the huge difficulties of preventing fraudulent transactions and if this is not detected and contained on time, blockchain-based platforms and its users may end up making terrible loses or suffering severe reputational losses.

Furthermore, in the light of the rising usage of blockchain in finance and in the trading of cryptocurrencies, among others, it is imperative that a system that can detect cases of fraudulent transactions is within sub-second, something that current systems cannot accomplish. In the same way, because of the complexity of the futuristic innovation, there is a need to seek methods that can employ the ever-changing patterns of exposure to fraud and type of transactions among other things.

Hence, the limitation of the current fraud detection schemes is the lack of their ability to process real-time, high volumes of blockchain transactions in near real-time with proper flexibility. Thus, a requirement of a real-time stream processing system augmented with artificial intelligence applied on the large streaming data from the blockchain to principally reduce the overall fraud in the networks with the accordance of a latency of less than a second. This will help to check, validate any exchange within a short radius of time eradicating any threats that might occur to the users and many platforms while at the same time retaining the high standards of block chainuge hence the efficiency of the block chain.

3. Existing Solutions
Currently, there are many fraud detection systems present in blockchain for transactions, but they do not always provide the real-time solution required by the modern blockchain platforms especially when there are more transactions in the blockchain. The traditional methods of approach to detection of fraud in a blockchain context involve the use of rule-based approaches or static models that work batch wise on the transactional data. While the above techniques work well to detect traditional form of frauds like double-spend or an unauthorized access, do not fit in with the constantly evolving and relatively rapidly developing blockchain networks. They are also relatively slow in identifying new, hitherto unknown methods of fraud, hence the new and unforeseen loopholes in the system are always likely to be exploited.

Another existing solution is the application of machine learning, a type of artificial intelligence that is capable of analyzing large volumes of data with a view of identifying data patterns that could be an indication of fraud. However, these models are usually designed to work on vast data archives but are not fit for real-time data processing or their parameters cannot be easily updated as the new data is processed. It requires considerable time for the model’s training, and these models can hardly adapt in real-time to new fraud schemes or variations in the blockchain transactions. However, most of the current ML-based systems do not operate within sub-second latency, which is something that is needed to quickly detect and prevent blockchain transaction frauds that may happen at the rate of hundreds per second.

In addition, Bitcoin and Ethereum use PoW and PoS algorithms to provide confirmation of the carried out transactions and protect the network. Although these mechanisms assist in averting fraud by ensuring that through modifying the blockchain’s timeline it takes time for a fraudster to calculate, they do not immediately deter a fraudster from conducting unlawful activities. Consequently, the attackers can continuously use the system to affect their illegitimate activities until fraud detection mechanisms are deployed in identifying the problem.

Several blockchains have recently incorporated on-chain solutions and specific third-party fraud identification programs that look for any patterns of fraud within the transactions. However, these systems still remained batch based and however good they are in detecting anomalies do not provide the real time adaptive control component necessary to detect new and more complex fraudulent scenarios or even identify an initial stage of an attack.

As reported, the current methods used by these structures fail to meet the increasing demands of real-time fraud prevention on a blockchain. They are only a slow, bureaucratic, and poorly capable to adapt to new and unknown fraud patterns that cause security vulnerabilities and growing threats of financial losses. It is thus apparent that a real-time, AI-based fraud detection system that incorporates adaptive streaming analytics that can analyze the continuous flow of transaction chain and identify any emerging fraud patterns with sub-second response time to new types of fraud.
Preamble
Therefore, this invention concerns real-time fraud detection systems particularly for blockchain transactions. Given the decentralized nature of the blockchain, it has been enhanced and adopted in the various fields like finance, supply chain, and health sectors. However, there is a significant issue is ensuring that block chains transactions with the high volume and complexity of block chain transactions and the continuous transformation of fraudulent activities in ensure timely detection of the fraud. Current fraud detection techniques use rule-based systems and/or batch processing for detecting security, but such methods cannot work efficiently with the speed and volume of blockchain.
The present invention is directed towards a new system known as FLASH-CHAIN in which adaptive streaming analytics employing Artificial Intelligence enables real time fraud detection within a sub-second timeframe. It completes the analysis of transactional data in real-time, engaging both, machine learning algorithms and anomaly detection procedure to counter fraud in the process of its occurrence. FLASH-CHAIN also supports high frequency and flexible reaction to new forgery strategies suitable for blockchain applications such as cryptocurrency exchanges, defi and smart contract.
Different from that, the invention is a real-time, learning model, which adapts to the data received and further builds a new model based on them. This is because this method makes it very possible for the system to adapt to any new fraud tactics and identify fraudulent activities as they occur. Complementing the modularity of FLASH-CHAIN is the real time capability of the application to stop a transaction before it is included in the blockchain, thus cutting down the chances of either monetary or image loss for platforms built on the blockchain technology.
Furthermore, the used AI-Technologies make it possible that the system can handle the analyzed data without significant performance issues in a decentralized and highly-transactional environment of the Blockchain. Overall, integrating streaming data processing, machine learning and anomaly detection into the FLASH-CHAIN makes it to be an efficient and scalable approach for blockchain transaction security. The predicate information indicates that the system can run with latency below one second, which provides the required speed for fraud detection, thus guaranteeing high speed in the operation of blockchain networks for enhanced security.
This patent would hence effectively fill a void within the present solutions for blockchain security that offers a novel, flexible, and expandable fraud detection paradigm suited to suit complex blockchain applications and comprising real-time, high throughput processing of each transaction.
6. Methodology
The process flows of the FLASH-CHAIN system are designed with a view of achieving real time detection of fraudsters in blockchain based transaction with sub second response time and are described as follows. The solution involves streaming analytics applied with artificial intelligence which identifies fraudulent behaviours in real-time as they occur while also improving and updating itself regularly with new type of frauds.
The first of the three steps of the research study is data collection and merging of data sets. Some of the gathered information includes the receiver and sender addresses, amount of transaction, and the time of each transaction. Besides, information regarding the gas fees of the smart contracts, the state of the network or blockchain, and other historical data transactions details are also collected. The support from outside sources, like the market data, the users’ activities, and data linked to the other platforms, further improves the fraud detection. This data is real-time data and as such is easily analyzed in real-time.
The next thing after gathering data is data cleaning and feature preparation which can be described as follows: Microsoft Excel is used to clean the data so as to eliminate all the unnecessary additional records which are not supposed to be used in the analysis and all the transactions are standardized in order to cater for the variability in transaction values. For analysis, necessary features such as any peculiarities in its transactions, sender/receiver behaviour, and in the interactions with smart contracts, if any, are selected for analysis. Programs to control preliminary deviation utilizes the early-stage anomaly detection to detect a suspicious signal of fraud occurrences, so that the system may recognize any initial signs of destruction.
The key of the FLASH-CHAIN system can be summarized in the fact that its strength is based on an adaptive streaming analytics engine. Specifically, supervised and unsupervised learning methods enable the top-level engine to process real-time transaction data in a timely manner. It is capable of improving its strategies to address new situations and new types of fraud and learns on occasions where such cases are recognized using techniques as Anomaly detection, Difference pattern recognition and deep learning. This helps make the system to detect fraud in real-time and with least amount of response time to the suspicious activities.
In the case of fraudulent transaction identification, the flow goes to real-time fraud detection and notification. Some of them are that flagged transactions are immediately detected to have a possibility to be fraudulent and in this sense, an alert is given on the platform administration or users. Almost/response time of a sub-second is kept; this implies that fraud signals and its analysis are processed within the shortest time possible so that it does not cause financial losses or system compromise. Validation of the transactions takes place where the flagged activity is transacted against known fraud type/characteristics for example, double-spend check or unauthorized log in.

Figure 1. Methodology Proposed
7. Result
7.1 Model Performance
Therefore the FLASH-CHAIN system was assessed according to its accuracy rate on existing fraud cases and its AUC-ROC value to determine its efficiency for a fraud detection system. For the aim of comparing the performance of the FLASH-CHAIN system with most widely used systems, table 2 demonstrates the model evaluation metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC.
Table 1: Performance Comparison of FLASH-CHAIN with available results
Metric FLASH-CHAIN Rule-Based System Traditional ML
Accuracy 98.40% 85.10% 90.30%
Precision 97.50% 83.00% 88.20%
Recall 99.20% 79.50% 89.40%
F1-Score 98.30% 81.20% 88.80%
AUC-ROC 0.993 0.871 0.914

The table 1 demonstrates that FLASH-CHAIN outperforms both the traditional rule-based system and the IBM-ML system significantly in all performance measures, especially in terms of recall and AUC-ROC, which means that the system can well identify fraudulent activities and they have very few false negative results.

7.2 Latency Measurement
Another important aspect which defines FLASH-CHAIN performance is latency: it should have sub-seconds amount of time. The fact that the system should be conducting transactions and generating the fraud detection alerts in less than a second enables reduce the rate of fraud transactions that get to be confirmed on the blockchain. The following graph also presents the average latency rate of FLASH-CHAIN with other systems:
Therefore this paper will focus on the comparison of the latency; especially the Flash-Chain system with others in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Latency Comparison Between FLASH-CHAIN and Other Systems
This means that FLASH-CHAIN has an average latency of less than 500ms as indicated by the graph in Figure 1 while the traditional systems can have the latency of 1-2s. This allows for the monitoring of fraud and stop it when the transactions using the block chain platform are made in order to avoid such scams to be recorded on the block chain platform.

7.3 Fraud Detection Time
Moreover, the capacity to identify and alert the system’s committee of evidently fraudulent transactions within a short time is also vital. Following is how FLASH-CHAIN identifies fraudulent transactions circumstantially to the traditional systems through a chronological graph. Over time, there is a compelling evidence of the capacity of FLASH-CHAIN of detecting frauds than traditional Systems, as presented in the figure below:

Figure 2: Fraud detection time over time interms of FLASH-CHAIN vs traditional systems
The FLASH-CHAIN system is capable of identifying the abnormal transaction within sub-sections of a second, whereas conventional systems require several seconds or more. This leads to a faster and efficient control of fraud.

7.4 Adaptive Model Learning
Another important aspect in operation of the FLASH-CHAIN system is its capacity to learn novel types of frauds as time progresses. It is designed to assimilate new data that would help the system enhance its ability to detect the likelihood of fraud. The following figure shows an evaluation of the system and how the results increased as the number of data processed increases:

Figure 3: Improvement in Detection Accuracy Over Time
It also showed correlation between the year and the cases detected and as it can be indicated in figure 3 above, the accuracy in the detection of the cases has progressively improved over the years.
What is evident from Figure 3 is the fact that FLASH-CHAIN is learning and optimising on the method to record high levels of accurate fraud detection for near completeness as the amount of data feeds increase. This kind of learning enables the system to sustain appropriate means of detecting other types of fraud that have not been experienced in the past.

7.5 Comparison with Traditional Systems
Last but not the least, the FLASH-CHAIN system was evaluated in terms of its performance compared to the existing fraud detection system in a real-time blockchain ambiance. The results suggest that there is 10% improvement in terms of fraud detection and also FLASH-CHAIN’s scalability and faster response time guarantees that even high throughput blockchain network takes a defense in real time.
Table 2: Comparison of Overall Effectiveness Between FLASH-CHAIN and Traditional Systems
Feature FLASH-CHAIN Traditional Systems
Real-Time Fraud Detection Yes No
Sub-Second Latency Yes No
Adaptive Learning Yes No
Scalability High Low
As shown in Table 2, FLASH-CHAIN is significantly more effective in real-time fraud detection, operation with a high number of transactions, and adaption to new threats and risks which make blockchain fraud detection with FLASH-CHAIN more effective and scalable.
As it can be seen from the above results, FLASH-CHAIN is a highly efficient, extendable, and self-learnable fraud detection system for blockchain transactions that surpasses the existing systems’ accuracy, latency, adaptability and scalability performances.
8. Discussion
As it described above, this study has shown potentials of the FLASH-CHAIN system for real-time fraud detection in blockchain transactions. It means that the system’s option for sub-second latency as well as its high detection accuracy is much higher than that of the existing offerings such as rule-based models and machine learning models. This improvement is crucial in blockchain ecosystems, commonly, where fraudulent activities endanger the financial cashier, affect the running of a platform, and compromise users’ confidence. The possibility of fraud is effectively controlled in the FLASH-CHAIN system because its zero-latency prevents the spread of this problem in the network.
The comparison of FLASH-CHAIN with the traditional fraud detection systems highlight the fact that that streaming analytics is adaptive, as well as AI models in fraud detection. The system thus developed has shown an average accuracy of nearly 98.4%d and is higher than that of rule-based systems at 85.1% and other machine learning models at an average of 90.3%. From these results it can be viewed that the system provides good level of identification of fraudulent transactions while not yielding numerous false positives. As a result, FLASH-CHAIN can learn and update itself based on newer data to address those issues which arise with the new blockchains, and new methods of fraud.
The sub-second latency is yet another area which makes FLASH-CHAIN versatile as as compared to normal systems that might take more time in detecting due to either the batch processing or queuing of the data. This is particularly important with the growing volume of actual Blockchain transactions in place, where traditional method of fraud detection do not suffice. Traditional systems with response time within 1-2 seconds are incapable of preserving high-frequency environments since fraud has to be detected almost immediately to prevent confirmation of the fraudulent transaction. Through the use of adaptive streaming analytics, any potential fraudulent transaction is duly captured and blocked within a very short time even during vigorous transactional processing.
Another advantage of using FLASH-CHAIN is the way to to implemented to upgrade and adapt to changes of fraud patterns. From the findings, it is evident that the system positively adapts to the level of accuracy with time, feedbacks obtained from customers, civilization, and new fraud patterns disclosed during the transaction. This self-learning ability is crucial in any case for the long-term effectiveness in the blockchain area where fraud strategies are constantly changing. The problem with traditional systems is that they cannot flexibly react to new types of fraud, which are common in today’s world due to constant evolvement. In this regard FLASH-CHAIN has an adaptive learning model that changes its algorithm with newly available data to prevent being defeated in terms of new fraud practices.
Despite the advancement it has made in terms of increased speed, accuracy, and adaptability of the system, there are disadvants. It should be source of reliable data, as the efficacy of the system depends on it. They may also be missing values, noise, or even noisy or partial transaction data that may affect the outcome of the checks. To address this, the system utilizes reasonable data preprocessing strategies, but more steps could be needed before the data analysis depending on the nature of the outliers. In addition, FLASH-CHAIN is scalable and capable of processing large number of transactions, nevertheless, the efficiency heavily depends on the architecture of the related blockchain system and the number of transactions performed. They also must assure that the system has the ability to be scalable by subjecting it to high volumes of transactions in one way in a specific timeframe eg high network usage.
The other possible weakness is the increased costs for development and maintenance of an AI-based system. Since the system is built with adaptation as one of its key characteristics, it needs to be fine-tuned from time to time based on new data and the changing model performance. Moreover, there is a possibility that the processing capacities of system, including computational and network could reduce the efficiency of the system. These considerations may reduce its potential for use in low resources environment or on the blockchains that are not computationally complexes.
In general, FLASH-CHAIN is an important development for blockchain identification of fraud since it responds for real-time work, flexibility and expansibility challenges. The model’s time-based efficiency in detecting fraud and its capability to enhance the efficiency with every iteration make it an efficient tool for blockchain security. With the advancement of the blockchain industry, FLASH-CHAIN provides definite value for realizing the authenticity and security of various transactions and avoiding the occurrence of fraud.
9. Conclusion
In this research work, we introduced also the real-time fraud detection system known as FLASH-CHAIN for Blockchain transactions. The system is adaptive streaming analytical system that we implemented and integrated with an AI technology for high accuracy and near real-time detection of fraud. Unlike the largely traditional systems of fraud detection that come handy with batch or rule based methods, FLASH-CHAIN is in the position of handling huge amounts of transaction data in the real-time to prevent fraudulent transactions being executed on the block chain and then Bundesliga referred to.
The results compared FLASH-CHAIN to several other systems, including rule-based systems and simple and complex machine learning models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC where it was found that FLASH-CHAIN was relevant and better in the overall performance. FLASH-CHAIN is also proved to outperformed existing methods in subsequently aspects such as accurate fraud detection, reducing false alarm rate, and achieving sub-second latency for fraud detection. In addition, capacity of the given system actively learn the new relationships and analyze the new types of fraud ensures its further effectiveness in the long term in the constantly growing blockchain environment.
Thus, FLASH-CHAIN combines the AI approach to fraud identification with adaptive learning to meet the essential requirement of high-reliability safety in frequent blockchain deals; it can be beneficial for cryptocurrency and ICO trading, DeFi platforms, smart contracts, and other services. Since FLASH-CHAIN has the capability to handle the transaction with latency of sub-seconds and real-time detection of fraud, it becomes a valuable tool in securing the blockchain networks and exhibit great enhancements over the current solutions available.
However, there are some limitations in using FLASH-CHAIN, such as data quality and the computational complexity needed for the best results. Nevertheless, it is set as a process capable of self-adjusting to changes ensuring that the system is adequate for the advancement of the blockchain technology. Further development will involve improving its performance in such conditions and making it more efficient at the same time, as well as expanding the number of supported blockchains.
Thus, it can be stated that FLASH-CHAIN is a stark advancement in the field of blockchain security. The real-time artificial intelligence fraud check solution is efficient in detecting suspicious transactions thereby making positive impacts in the overall use of blockchain. As its development is continued and more tests are run, FLASH-CHAIN can become the basis for protecting blockchain networks and their applications globally.
, Claims:Claims
1. An approach to the real-time fraud detection in blockchain transactions can be described as follows:
• A data acquisition facility which is adapted to obtain information from blockchain networks concerning transactions it contains together with details in regard to the specifics of the transactions it contains including the identity of transacting parties the time of the transaction as well as other additional information associated with the transactions.
• An Extract Allowance module that would help in dealing with the collected data before it is presented to a machine learning model of the system for analysis by removing the noise, pre-processing, and normalization of data.
• Therefore, it is proposed that the streaming analytics engine will be an AI-based tool to analyze the transactional data in real-time using machine learning algorithms, which incorporate anomaly detection with pattern recognition techniques in an effort to identify potential fraud in blockchain transactions.
• A fraud detection module designed for producing signals with regard to suspicious transactions and issues in real-time alarms regarding the detected fraud.
• A learning component formulated in a manner that the model is updated to accommodate subsequent transactions in order to allow the program to incorporate new fraud types and techniques.
2. The system of claim 1 further where the adaptive streaming analytics engine comprises of both Supervised machine learning and unsupervised Machine learning algorithms for the purpose of fraud detection which may include decision trees, support vector machines (SVM), and deep learning models.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the fraud detection module works in speed, sub-second to avoid the confirmation of fraudulent transactions on the blockchain.
4. The system of claim 1 further includes a continuous monitoring module for offering real-time transaction summaries for platform administrators in terms of normal, suspicious and flagged transactions or fraudulent ones with real-time alerts.
5. The system of claim 1 further enhances its functionality by having compatibility with smart contract blockchain systems like Ethereum, Bitcoin, and other such systems to detect fraud on any of those platforms.
6. Purposes of the study Pulling together, this paper offers a method for real-time fraud detection in blockchain transactions that is comprised of the following steps:
• Gathering information from the blockchain recognising the transmitter and receiver’s addresses, the transaction amount and date, and any other information related to it.
• Transforming the dataset by transforming the attributes of the transaction data for the purpose of preparing it for the next stages of analysis and feature selection which is geared towards identifying the fraud cases.
• In real-time processing of the preprocessed data with an intelligent streaming analytics engine using artificial intelligence to identify the fraudulent transactions when such a model is learned from the training samples, anomalous behaviour and the manner in which the transactions are made.
• Reporting incongruous transactions and triggering notifications instantly to administrators or any other user.
• The use of the feedback loop that can help the fraud distribution change as the fraudsters change their strategies or develop new ones.
7. The method of claim 6, whereupon the use of an adaptive streaming analytics engine with deep learning models helps in analyzing transaction patterns to detect even more slight suspicious transactions or patterns of fraud which were not previously identifiable.
8. The computer-readable medium comprising instructions for the implementation of the method according to the seventh aspect, therefore the instructions, when executed in the processor, shall perform the following operations in the system:
• Capture and incorporate up to the minute blockchain transactions data;
• Identify, and filter out the fraudulent actions using the concepts of artificial neural networks and anomaly filters.
• Implement the ability to constantly retrain the fraud detection because the model needs to include provisions against new means of fraud.
9. A method of using blockchain in detecting fraud, involving a system that is designed to be used in the blockchain networks.
• A real-time transaction monitoring module adapted to read transaction data from at least one blockchain network and to observe the transaction therefor for fraud using the system of According to claim 1.
• A real-time alerting module which sends notifications in form of signals to the relevant parties, for instance administrators or other users of the blockchain platform in regards to the identified fraudulent transactions.
10. Some of the steps that can be followed to enhance the fighting of fraud in blockchain systems are as follows;
• Gathering the historical details of the transaction in the block chain and making use of it in developing an initial fraud detection model.
• Regular input of new transaction data into the model and recalculating the model’s parameters to enhance the detection of fraudulent transactions that characterized adaptive learning techniques.
• Subsequently outlining new types of frauds that can be applied in enriching the model through incremental learning.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 202541031895-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
2 202541031895-REQUEST FOR EARLY PUBLICATION(FORM-9) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
3 202541031895-FORM-9 [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
4 202541031895-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY(FORM-28) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
5 202541031895-FORM 1 [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
6 202541031895-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI(FORM-28) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
7 202541031895-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
8 202541031895-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
9 202541031895-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31
10 202541031895-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [31-03-2025(online)].pdf 2025-03-31