Abstract: TITLE: A SUSPENSION CONCENTRATE FORMUALATION OF CHLORANTRANILIPROLE AND ABAMECTIN ABSTRACT: A suspension concentrate formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin. More particularly the present invention relates to a suspension-concentrate (SC) formulation of stable and synergistic insecticidal composition comprising Chlorantraniliprole; and Abamectin of formula for plant pest control. The present invention further relates to component (A) Chlorantraniliprole present in a range between 1% to 10%w/w/; and component (B) is Abamectin present in a range between 0.1% to 5%w/w along with inactive excipients. The suspension concentrate formulation of the present invention is stable and the insecticidal composition show synergistic insecticidal activity.
DESC:FIELD OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to a suspension-concentrate (SC) formulation of stable and synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B) for plant pest control. More particularly, the present invention relates to a suspension-concentrate insecticidal composition with enhanced action for plant pest control, the said insecticidal composition comprises two active chemical compounds i.e. (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B). The present invention also relates to a process for the preparation of the above said suspension-concentrate composition for plant pest control.
Formula (A) (chlorantraniliprole / CAS NO: 500008-45-7)
Formula (B) (Abamectin / CAS No. 71751-41-2/65195-55-3/65195-56-4).
Moreover, the invention relates to formulations having combinations of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin and their use for combatting plant insects.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Insecticides are the substances or mixture of substances, which are used in order to inhibit, control or reduce the damage to plants done by pests. Insecticides may be a chemical substance, a biological agent such as virus or bacteria, an antimicrobial agent, a disinfectant or any other agent. Since most of the chemical insecticides are unable to exhibit an activity selective for the target organism, they may at the same time cause various side (adverse) effects on the organisms other than the targeted organism or even the death of the same. Many insecticides are also harmful for the human. They cause common diseases and undesirable problematic conditions in the humans as a result of the consumption of the living beings to which they are applied as a food by the humans. Many insecticides are also harmful for the human.
Chlorantraniliprole is an insecticide of the ryanoid class, developed by DuPont belonging to a new class of selective insecticides featuring a novel mode of action to control a range of pests belonging to the order Lepidoptera and some other Coleoptera, Diptera and Isoptera species.
Chlorantraniliprole activates ryanodine receptor via stimulation of the release of calcium stores from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of muscle cells ( i.e. for chewing insect pest) causing impaired regulation, paralysis and ultimately death of sensitive species.
Chlorantraniliprole is an insecticide that activates insect ryanodine receptors, leading to unregulated loss of internal calcium stores, uptake is primarily through ingestion, and secondary by contact, with exposed insects exhibitory general lethargy and muscle paralysis, the insects rapidly stop feeding, and ultimately die. The differential selectivity of Chlorantraniliprole had towards insect rynodine receptors explained the outstanding profile of low mammalian toxicity.
IUPAC name:-5-bromo-N-[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-(methylcarbamoyl) phenyl]-2-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (CAS No. 500008-45-7 )
Abamectin is an insecticide, acaricide, nematicide and anthelmintic. Abamectin is also used as a veterinary antihelmintic. Resistance to abamectin-based antihelmintics, although a growing problem, is not as common as to other classes of veterinary antihelmintics. The benzoate salt emamectin benzoate is also used as an insecticide.
Abamectin was first disclosed by G. Albers-Schönberg et al., DE 2717040; eidem, US 4310519 (1977, 1982 both to Merck & Co.). Abamectin is a fermentation product belonging to the Avermectin group, which is a well-known agricultural chemical in the industry. It is a compound, which is effective on many pests and which elicits the insecticide, nematicide and miticide characteristics.
Abamectin act by stimulating the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, thus finally activating chloride channels with contact and stomach action, has limited plant systemic activity, but exhibit translaminar movement.
IUPAC Name : Mixture of 80% (2aE,4E,8E)-(5'S,6S,6'R,7S, 11R,13S,15S,17aR,20R,20aR,20bS)-6'-[(S)-sec-butyl]-5',6,6',7,10, 11,14,15,17a,20,20a,20b-dodecahydro-20,20b-dihydroxy-5',6,8,19-tetramethyl-17-oxospiro[11,15-methano-2H,13H,17H-furo[4,3,2-pq] [2,6]benzodioxacyclooctadecin-13,2'-[2H]pyran]-7-yl 2,6-dideoxy-4-O-(2,6-dideoxy-3-O-methyl-a-L-arabino-hexopyranosyl)-3-O-ethyl-a-L-arabino-hexopyranoside and 20% (2aE,4E,8E)-(5'S,6S,6'R,7S, 11R,13S,15S,17aR,20R,20aR,20bS)-5',6,6',7,10,11, 14,15, 17a,20, 20a, 20b-dodecahydro-20,20b-dihydroxy-6'-isopropyl-5',6,8,19- tetramethyl-17-oxospiro[11,15-methano-2H,13H,17H-furo[4,3,2-pq][2,6] benzodioxacyclooctadecin-13,2'-[2H]pyran]-7-yl2,6-dideoxy-4-O-(2,6-dideoxy-3-O-methyl-a-L-arabino-hexopyranosyl)-3-O-methyl-a-L-arabino-hexopyranoside
Chemical abstracts name:- mixture of 5-O-demethylavermectin A1a and 5-O-demethyl-25-de (1-methylpropyl)-25- (1-methylethyl) avermectin A1a (4:1)
CAS No. :- (71751-41-2 ) ABAMECTIN: (65195-55-3)(i) (65195-56-4)(ii).
Insect / pests are one of the worst enemies of crops. They causes severe damages to the crops resulting in reduced crop productivity. In heavily infested areas 80 to 90 percent crop damages has been reported. In agrarian countries like India it badly impacts the economy of the country. Controlling crop pest population has been a major issue and various traditional and advanced means are being used to minimize the damage caused by insect pests. Most frequently and widely used method to control insect pests is use of insecticides/pesticides. Continuous use of pesticides and insecticides years after years, in uncontrolled and unscientific manner has resulted in development of resistance in the insect pests and this resistance continues to broaden in spectrum against the number of insecticides/pesticides. Continuous high intensity use of insecticides and pesticides has given rise to some other critical issues like presence of high quantity of insecticide residues in agricultural products, increasing environmental pollution and damage to ecological balance and deteriorating health of consumers.
Insecticides are the substances or the substance mixtures, which are used in order to inhibit, control or reduce the damage caused by the pests.
Therefore, there is a need for an insecticidal formulation that is highly efficient, has low toxicity, covers a broader spectrum of insects and is environment friendly and economical.
The present invention relates to agrochemical compositions based on suspension concentrate formulation; their use for application in crop protection flowable formulations for controlling agricultural pests, weeds or diseases and reducing the wash-off of active ingredients by rainfall. Biological efficacy of pesticides is influenced by many factors, particularly the residence time of the pesticide on the treated surface, which is often a plant leaf surface. For example, emulsified oil or water insoluble polymers prepared as emulsions have been used to improve liquid formulation.
A number of chemical agents have been used for controlling plant pest control. However, the problem that plant pest have acquired resistance to the chemical agents becomes remarkable due to frequent use or excessive application, etc., of the chemical agents having similar structures and same functions for controlling the same kinds of pest.
Pesticide compounds are often applied in the form of a dilute aqueous composition in order to achieve a good interaction with the target organism, such as plants, and insects. As most active compounds that are used as pesticides, in particular insecticide/pesticide active compounds, are only sparingly or even insoluble in water, in most of the cases, formulators are often confronted with difficulties in formulating pesticide compounds in stable formulations.
On the other hand, consumers' needs for agricultural chemical-reduced crops and social needs to reduce environmental loads due to agricultural chemicals have now increased. Also, in a farmer's field where the chemicals have been actually used, when two or more kinds of chemicals are used in admixture for the treatment by the tank mix method, there are many risks to lower the effect of the other chemical to be mixed with each other or possibilities to cause chemical damages against plant materials depending on a combination of chemicals where they are not well-suited to each other.
Applicant is desirous to provide suspension concentrate of insecticidal composition comprising components (compounds) having different basic structures and different functions with well-suited to each other, and a method for controlling plant pest.
Applicant is desirous to provide insecticidal composition in suspension concentrate form wherein insecticidal composition comprises Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) as main active chemical compound which is further used in preparing suspension concentrate combining it with the other chemical compound selected from Abamectin of formula (B).
The conventional formulation of pesticides available in market of Chlorantraniliprole, the pesticide formulation are often prepared by use of toxic organic solvents, more conventional single product formulations disadvantages. A conventional suspension concentrate when stored under severe environment conditions at high temperature or low temperature, oil droplets and particles (dispersoids) dispersed in water may sometimes cause a change such as particle growth, separation of an aqueous layer and formation of a hard cake due to aggregation and precipitation of dispersoids, or a change in appearance such as creaming of the formulation, and thus the conventional suspension concentrate was not necessarily sufficient in storage stability.
The formulation / combination of insecticides manufacturers always search the ways for developing the mixture of insecticides in a way that is safer for the environment, humans and other non-targeted organisms and for formulating the same in a way that provides more effective and economical use against the targeted pests, or they receive the support from the academic institutions in this regard. The increasing environmental consciousness and the research conducted about the harmful effects of the chemicals have accelerated these efforts even further. Moreover, different combinations and different formulations are resorted to, in order to eliminate the situations such as the resistance to insecticides, which is acquired for various reasons. The harmful effects of the insecticides on the one hand and the health risks and economic losses caused by the insect pests on the other hand prompted the researches to seek a safer and more effective insecticide.
According to current practice, formulations of Chlorantraniliprole and formulations of Abamectin individual molecules are used as formulations such as single suspension concentrates (SC), emulsion concentrates (EC), microcapsulation (CS, MC), water dispersible powder (WP), water dispersible granules (WDG, WG, SG), oil in water emulsions (EW), microemulsions (ME), oil based concentrates (ODC, OC, OD), etc. In this case, considerable resistance issues emerge with the continued applications of insecticide molecule and as a result, the desired result may not be achieved. In addition, undue economic losses and environmental pollution occur.
Furthermore, the combinations of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin, is not known in the present the state of the art. The combinations / formulation comprising Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin that are used together in suspension concentrate (SC) formulation according to the present invention have been observed to provide great efficacy at low dose, exhibit insecticidal and acaricidal action against the insects damaging the agricultural products and achieve the successful results, which were not possible to obtain previously with any insecticide.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION/ SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION:
The object of the invention, is to combine the active molecules of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin by means of the formulation technique, which formulation would eliminate the risks of insecticide resistance for the effective control of the insect pests posing a problem in the fields of agriculture and which would be capable of controlling more than one generation and different insect species by a single application.
With the invention, a novel formulation comprising of composition is developed for the management of resistance, by way of combination of two different molecules with two different mechanism of action in a single formulation.
The object of the invention is to allow the development of the effective, ecological and economical compositions that achieve the ideal combination via ideal formulae.
Another object of the invention is to eliminate the irritation, enhance the activity and prolong the duration of action to advanced standards by way of suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and abamectin that are used together, in a single combination.
With the invention, it is also intended to take more than one generation under control via single administration. This is achieved owing to the long duration of action of the invention.
Another object of the invention is to control multiple agricultural pests via single administration.
Another object of the invention is to provide, via single administration, the possibility of effective control over Lepidoptera, Coleptera, Diptera, Isoptera, Mites, Leaf minors, Leaf suckers, Colorado beetles Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm , Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites, which is also an important problem in the vineyards and Rice, Cabbage, Cotton, Sugarcane, Tomato, Potato, Nut crops, Chili, Brinjal, Pigeon pea, Soybean, Bengal gram, Black gram, Bitter gourd, Okra, Rose (Ornamental), Grapes. In other words, it is intended to control two separate important pests by means of single administration.
The present invention provides a formulation comprising of composition of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin and at least one agrochemically acceptable excipient, has unexpectedly high activities in the control of various pests.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a formulation of composition of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin, with a view to effective resistance management and effective control of harmful pests, at a reduced total amount of active compounds applied, have improved activity against the harmful pest (synergistic mixtures) and minimize risk of phytotoxicity.
The present invention is related to a combination insecticidal formulation in a suspension concentrate (SC) form. Insecticidal formulation of this invention is stable, less hazardous, safe to handle, environmentally safe and cost effective. The pesticides used in this formulation act synergistically to cover broader spectrum of pests of crops.
Accordingly, the main object of the present invention is to provide a suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of stable and synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) second compound Abamectin of formula (B) for plant pest control.
It is an object of the present invention suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of stable and synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) in amount of 1% to 10% (w/w) (preferably 5% to 6%) and (ii) second compound Abamectin of formula (B) in a range between 0.1% to 5% (w/w) (preferably 1.5% to 2.5%).
It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for the preparation of the suspension concentrate combination formulation of the present insecticide, comprising the step of:
a) Forming the aqueous solution comprising of wetting and dispersing agent or emulsifier;
b) An aqueous dispersion (suspension concentrate, SC) of Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) in amount of 1% to 10% (w/w) (preferably 5% to 6%);
c) A suspension concentrate (SC) at second compound Abamectin of formula (B) in a range between 0.1% to 5% (w/w) (preferably 1.5% to 2.5%);
d) Addition of anti-freeze agent;
e) Addition of antifoam agent;
f) An emulsion polymer system comprising I) hydrophobically modified copolymers i.e. Acrylate copolymer; and II) non-ionic surfactant, polyalkoxylated butyl ether; and
g) One or more additives selected from the group consisting of non-ionic or anionic surfactants or dispersing aids;
h) Wet grinding of the suspension in pressurized bead mill to reduce particle size of the suspension up to D90 less than 10 micron;
i) Mixing of components into formulation to prepare suspension concentrate (SC) formulation;
j) Finally adding the stabilizing agent /viscosity agent & preservative to the suspension concentrate (SC) to enhance viscosity.
In above objective suspension concentrate (SC) formulation according to the invention may additionally comprise: e) penetration promoters, wetting agents, spreading agents and/or retention agents.
It is an object of the present invention to provide improved a suspension concentrate formulation, of synergistic insecticidal composition is which stable and ready to use, and has superior properties compared to prior art formulations or mixtures or compositions.
It is further an object of the present invention to provide a suspension concentrate composition that will protect crop from pest.
Yet it is an object of the present invention to provide a suspension concentrate composition for plant pest control wherein the said composition comprises two active chemical compounds (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and second compound Abamectin, of formula (B).
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a synergistic suspension concentrate composition for plant pest control, the said composition mainly comprises: (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B).
Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for the preparation of suspension concentrate (SC) composition for plant pest control.
The further object of the present invention is to provide highly storage-stable suspension concentrate formulation of synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) second compound Abamectin of formula (B), which show excellent storage stability and biological efficacy for use in plant pest control.
It is also an object to provide a method of application of composition to the plants to control the plant pest.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the formulation comprising of composition of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin.
According to the invention, the simultaneous presence of the Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin molecules owing to the suspension concentrate (SC) formulation generates a synergistic action as well as allowing the insecticidal, nematicidal and acaricidal actions to be obtained via a single product and resulting in a controlled long-time activity.
Abamectin is an insecticide, nematicide and acaricide. The duration of action for the Abamectin molecule formulated other than the suspension concentrate (SC) formulation is limited to 5-7 days. Suspension concentrate (SC) formulation has strong insecticidal action, but it exhibits the character of a medium-strength acaricide. According to the invention, high insecticidal action as well as enhanced acaricidal action is achieved in a single combination. The studies demonstrating said action and the results of comparisons made with the existing formulations of the state of the art are presented to your attention in the examples.
By way of concomitant use of two molecules with different mechanisms of action, Chlorantraniliprole is a anthranilic diamide class insecticides is a ryanodine receptor activator and abamectin is effective as an activator of chloride channels, in a suspension concentrate (SC) formulation, the invention controls the insects resistant to Chlorantraniliprole group owing to the synergy of Abamectin, while controlling the insects resistant to Abamectin group owing to the synergy of Chlorantraniliprole. On the other hand, this action takes place via the capsule form. The other types of formulations have a short duration of action and the insect control remains limited to a part of the life phases of the insects. Since the capsule continuously releases these two active agents in the field of application, it controls both the young hatching individuals (larvae and nymphs) and the adult individuals, in other words, all the phases. The invention also exhibits activity to control the next 2-3 generations, thereby demonstrating an extraordinary biological activity. In short, the invention is a combination that adds a new dimension to the insect pest control against the problems frequently caused worldwide by the insects with and without resistance. With the formulations of the state of the art, new Insecticide application is required against every generation of the Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm , Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle & Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites and other plant pests in the spectrum, thus failing to enable an economical insect control due to the intensive labor involved and the great amount of insecticide used.
In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the treated plant is increased.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.
According to the present invention, "increased yield" of a plant, in particular of an agricultural, silvicultural and/or horticultural plant means that the yield of a product of the respective plant is increased by a measurable amount over the yield of the same product of the plant produced under the same conditions, but without the application of the mixture according to the invention.
The invention optimizes the aforesaid benefit via the suspension concentrate (SC) formulation. With the applications involving the formulation techniques other than suspension concentrate (SC) formulation, the two molecules in free state will shortly disappear from the ambience due to the solar rays and other environmental factors (first Abamectin, then Chlorantraniliprole). The shorter half-life of the Abamectin molecule than Chlorantraniliprole will destroy the dual molecule action expected from the combination. The invention of suspension concentrate (SC) formulation both molecules, thereby preventing them from being affected by the solar rays and other environmental conditions and providing the possibility to obtain the desired action from both molecules in the pest control.
A feature of the invention is that the formulations according to the invention are used for the control of the plant pests. The invention provides the possibility of control over Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm, Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites, etc.
In another especially preferred embodiment of the invention condition of the plant by treatment with suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of composition of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin, the plant Vitality of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the pest control of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.
The improvement of the pest control according to the present invention a formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin particularly improves any one or several or all of the above mentioned plant characteristics are improved independently of the another indicator for the condition of the plant is the "quality" of a plant and/or its products.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a formulation of,
1) Chlorantraniliprole;
2) Abamectin;
3) at least one or more inactive excipient.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a method for controlling harmful pest using a formulation of (A) Chlorantraniliprole and (B) Abamectin and (C) at least one or more inactive excipient.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention composition of present invention can be in form of suspension concentrate (SC) formulation.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of the formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin is effective for management of pest control in following crops Rice, Citrus fruits, Nut crops, Cabbage, Cotton, Sugarcane, Tomato, Chili, Brinjal, Pigeon pea, Soybean, Bengal gram, Black gram, Bitter gourd, Okra, Rose (Ornamental), Grapes.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of the formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin have very good pestecidal properties and can be employed for controlling control of various pest such as Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm , Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle & Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera & Isoptera.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to Suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin. The Suspension concentrate (SC) formulation is obtained by mixing active ingredients Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin, with dispersing agents, wetting agents, thickeners and carriers were added mixing tank to the first high shear coarsely pulverized, homogenized, and then drawn into a sand mill for fine grinding, a particle size distribution cytometry sanding material, when the particle size of the standard requirements, and then modulation into the reactor, after passing the last filter used for filtration, to obtain the finished product
The present inventors have extensively studied to improve the suspension concentrate (SC) formulation of combination of Chlorantraniliprole and Abamectin, and as a result, have found that a suspension concentrate (SC) is obtained by using Chlorantraniliprole (a.i.) 1-10% w/w , Abamectin ( a.i.) 0.1-5% w/w, Dispersing agent 1-15% w/w, Anti-freezing agent 1-15% w/w, Suspending agent 1-15% w/w, Deforming agent/antifoaming agent 0.1-5% w/w, Preservative agent or stabilizing agent 0.1-5% w/w, Viscosity Agent 1-15% w/w, Emulsifier 1-15% w/w, Wetting agent 1-5% w/w, Filler 30-80% w/w. The present inventors thus completed the present invention.
In more details as below
Chemical composition of Chlorantraniliprole + Abamectin Suspension concentrate (SC) formulation:-
Table-1:-
Component Name Value Unit Range (%)
Chlorantraniliprole a. i. ~5 % w/w 1-10%
Abamectin a.i ~2.0% w/w 0.1-5%
Dispersing agent ~7.5 % w/w 1-15%
Anti-freezing agent ~2.5 % w/w 1-5%
Suspending agent ~7.5 % w/w 1-15%
Deforming agent/antifoaming agent ~2.5 % w/w 1-5%
Preservative agent or stabilizing agent ~1 % w/w 1-5%
Viscosity Agent ~7.5 % w/w 1-15%
Emulsifier ~7.5 % w/w 1-15%
Wetting agent ~1 % w/w 1-5%
Filler Q.S w/w 35-65 %
Total 100.0 w/w
The process for preparing the present novel formulation can be modified accordingly by any person skilled in the art based on the knowledge of the manufacturing the formulation. However all such variation and modification is still covered by the scope of present invention.
In describing the embodiments of the invention, specific terminology is resorted for the sake of clarity. However, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific terms so selected and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
As used herein, the term "synergistic effect" or grammatical variations thereof means and includes a cooperative action encountered in a combination of two or more active compounds in which the combined activity of the two or more active compounds exceeds the sum of the activity of each active compound alone.
The term "synergistically effective amount," as used herein, means and includes an amount of two or more active compounds that provide a synergistic effect defined above.
The term "pesticidally effective amount," as used herein, means and includes an amount of active pesticide that causes an adverse effect to the at least one pest, wherein the adverse effect may include deviations from natural development, killing, regulation, or the like.
As used herein, the term "control" or grammatical variations thereof means and includes regulating the number of living pests or regulating the number of viable eggs of the pests or both.
A suspension concentrate formulation of synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) chlorantraniliprole of Formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B) where in oil droplets of a liquid pesticidal ingredient and particles of a solid pesticidal ingredient are dispersed together in water, and these ingredients are stably dispersed together in water.
The present inventors have studied in view of these circumstances and found that a suspension concentrate containing a Propylene Glycol (Anti freezing agent), Jemol D-425, JEEMOX-1269, Agrilan 788, Ethylin 500 LQ (emulsifiers) is a formulation having excellent storage stability, which suppresses the particle growth of dispersoids, namely, oil droplets of a liquid pesticidal ingredient and particles of a solid pesticidal ingredient, and also cause neither aggregation nor separation of dispersoids, nor formation of a hard cake, nor a change in appearance, during storage at high temperature and low temperature. Thus, the present invention has been completed. Namely, the present invention will be shown.
The active and inert ingredients in formulation of present invention are dispersed in aqueous solution, preferably water, to compose a stable and safe insecticide suspension.
The inert ingredients include wetting agents and dispersing agents, anti freeze agents, anti foam agents.
In one particular embodiment, a of the present invention is to provide a suspension concentrate formulation of synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B) for plant pest control.
The present invention contains two active chemical compounds that mutually complement each other when used together and exhibit synergistic plant pest control capabilities that is greater than the individual compound’s capability to control the plant pest when used alone.
The present innovators have comprehensively and successfully investigated the possibility of developing a synergistic suspension concentrate composition comprising: (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B).
According to the first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a suspension concentrate composition for plant pest control where in a composition may comprise two active chemical compounds i.e. (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) Abamectin of formula (B).
According to another embodiment of the present invention a suspension concentrate formulation compositions comprising:
a) an solvent / aqueous dispersion (suspension concentrate, SC) of Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A);
b) an solvent / aqueous dispersion (suspension concentrate, SC) of Abamectin of formula (B);
c) an emulsion polymer system comprising emulsifier or dispersing agent; and Anti freezing agent; and
d) one or more additives selected from the group consisting of non-ionic or anionic surfactants or dispersing aids.
In an embodiment, suspension concentrate formulation according to the invention may additionally comprise: e) penetration promoters, wetting agents, spreading agents and/or retention agents.
According to another embodiment of the present invention relates to a synergistic suspension concentrate composition comprising:
i. an effective amount of Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) in a range between 1% to 10% (W/W) dissolved in an organic solvent or aqueous medium:
ii. an effective amount of Abamectin of formula (B) in a range between 0.1 to 5% in organic solvent or aqueous medium;
iii. auxiliaries used in stage-(i) and stage-(ii) to prepare suspension concentrate composition; and
iv. optionally viscosity agent or deformer for adjusting viscosity of suspension concentrate composition.
The composition of the present invention also contains auxiliaries to be used in stage-(i) and stage-(ii) in the process for preparing suspension concentrate composition. In order to prepare stable, ready to use suspension concentrate compositions, Auxiliaries may be selected from but not limited to emulsifiers or dispersing agent, antifreeze agents, antifoaming agents, viscosity agents, thickeners, binders, fillers, stabilizers.
For the purpose of suspension concentrate composition, organic / aqueous solvent and auxiliaries may be selected from the list provided in the following paragraphs:
At least one organic solvent is selected from water, ethyl acetate, ethylene glycol, glycerine, heptane, hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), Hexamethylphosphoroustriamide (HMPT), monohydric alcohols, methanol, ethanol, ispropyl alccol, butanol, methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE), Toluene, Mix xylene, Acetone, Acetonitrile , solvent C-9 .
At least one emulsifier or dispersing agent is selected from a group comprising polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylalcohol, lignosulphonates, phenyl naphthalene sulphonates, phenyl naphthalene sulphonates, ethoxykated alkyl phenols, ethoxylated fatty acids, alkoxylated linearalcohols, polyaromaticsulphonates, glyceryl esters, maleic anhydridecopolymers, phosphate esters, condensation products of arylsulphonic acids and formaldehyde, addition product of ethylene oxideand fatty acid esters, lignin derivatives, naphthalene formaldehydecondensates, sodium salts of isodecylsulfosuccinic acid half ester, polycarboxylates, sodium alkylbenesulfonates, sodium salts ofsulfonated naphthalene, ammonium salts of sulfonated naphthalene, salts of polyacrylic acids, salts of phenolsulfonic acids and salts of naphthalene sulfonic acids.
At least one antifoaming agent / antifreezing agent selected from a group comprising polyvinyl alcohols, phenyl naphthalene sulphonate, lignin derivatives, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyalkylpyrrolidone, carboxymethylcellulose, xanthan gum, polyethoxylated, fatty acids, polyethoxylated fattyalcohols, ethylene oxide copolymer, propylene oxide copolymer, polyethylene glycols and polyethylene oxides.
Anti freeze agents such as Propylene glycol (polyols) are added in an amount ranging from 0.1-8% w/w based on the weight of the insecticidal combination to avoid the freezing of the liquid insecticide upon application so as to enhance the duration of activity of the said insecticidal composition on the pests.
Antifoam, preferably silicon or alcohol based, is added in an amount ranging from 0.1-5% w/w based on the weight of the insecticidal suspension.
Anti foam agents are significant when the ingredients in the suspension are mixed or ground so as to avoid the occurrence of froth during particle size reduction of the ingredients.
The stabilizing agents or viscosity enhancing agents, such as naturally occurring guar gum, xanthan gum, polyvinyl alcohol, gelatin, etc. is used to stabilize the suspension. The stabilizing agents are added in an amount ranging from 0.1-8% based on the weight of the suspension. Stabilizing agents forms a polymorphic matrix in the insecticidal formulation to provide a stabilized suspension of the active ingredients.
Though there are list of fillers known in the art, used in the suspension concentrate composition, inventors of the present invention has used mainly water as filler for suspension concentrate composition.
Viscosity agent or deformer may be added for adjusting viscosity of the suspension concentrate composition for example but limited to xanthan gum. The other examples of viscosity agent or deformer is a group comprising polyvinyl alcohols, phenyl naphthalene sulphonate, lignin derivatives, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyalkylpyrrolidone, carboxymethylcellulose, xanthan gum, polyethoxylated, fatty acids, polyethoxylated fatty alcohols, ethylene oxide copolymer, propyleneoxide copolymer, polyethylene glycols, silicon and polyethylene oxides.
The formulation thus prepared with varying amounts of wetting agents, dispersing agents were subjected to stability study and the optimum dose of the ingredients was selected. Formulation selected after various permutation and combination of ingredients was found to be stable and the best stable formulation was checked for parameters of description, suspensibility, dispersibility, pourability, viscosity, pH, under conditions of ambient temperature, heat stability and cold conditions at 10°C.
In general, synergistic suspension concentrate insecticidal composition comprising (i) Chlorantraniliprole of formula (A) and (ii) second compound Abamectin may be provided as follows:
Table-2:-
Name of Content in Composition Range of component (%)
Chlorantraniliprole 1-10%
Abamectin 0.1-5%
Antifreezing agent 0.1-10%
Organic solvent(s) 0-15%
Polymerization inhibitor 0.1-10%
Emulsifier 0.1-15%
Dispersing agent/emulsifier 0.1-15%
Filler (water ) Q.S.
Deforming agent 0.1-15%
Stabilizer 0.1-15%
Viscosity agent 0.1-8%
An aqueous suspension concentrate composition is a mixture of water-insoluble active ingredients dispersed in an aqueous solution, where one (or more) of the active ingredients is in suspension form and one (or more) of the active ingredients is in emulsion form. The formulation is intended for dilution into water prior to spray application. Mixtures of active ingredients are often used to provide a broader spectrum of pest control. Formulating the active ingredients together eliminates the need for tank mixing (which can lead to incompatibilities). Like other aqueous liquid formulations, suspension concentrate are easy to handle and measure, dust free, non-flammable and offer good miscibility with water.
According to second embodiment of the present invention, there is also a process provided for the preparation of suspension concentrate composition for controlling plant pest.
The selection of insecticide, quantity of each contents of additives/auxiliaries, particle size of insecticide compounds in the said suspension concentrate composition plays an important role in treating plant pest control.
ADVANTAGES OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The suspension concentrate insecticidal compositions of the present invention may show a broad spectrum activity against various insect-pest mentioned above and including insects resistant to chemicals, and shows excellent controlling effects (synergistic controlling effects) which could never be expected from a single component alone.
Also, it shows high plant insects (Lepidoptera, Coleptera, Diptera, Isoptera, Mites, Leaf minors, Leaf suckers, Colorado beetles, Stem borer, Leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm , Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mite) controlling effects against existing insects resistant to chemicals, and no chemical damage against plants can be admitted.
The said suspension concentrate insecticidal composition may be useful but not limited onto the plants such as paddy, sugarcane, cotton, vegetables, citrus fruits, pome fruits, nut crops, vegetables, ornamentals, grass, potatoes, leafy vegetables, oil crops, soybean, flowering ornamentals vine crops and fruit trees.
Example-1: Preparation of chlorantraniliprole (~5%) + Abamectin (~1.7%) suspension concentrate (SC) formulation:
Table-3:-
S. No. Raw Material Name Inputs quantity (g)
1 Chlorantraniliprole Technical (Purity 94.55% w/w ) 55.00
2 Abamectin technical (Purity 96.46% w/w) 17.80
3 Jemol D-425 (Emulsifier ) 10.0
4 JEEMOX-1269 (Emulsifier) 50.0
5 Propylene Glycol (Anti freezing agent) 100.00
6 Silicon defoamer 20.00
7 Formaldehyde (40% in water) 10.00
8 Xanthum gum (2.0% solution in water) 50.00
9 Water ( Q.S ) 687.2
Out put quantity (g) 1000.00
Process of Preparation for Chlorantraniliprole (~5% w/w) and Abamectin (~1.7%w/w) suspension concentrate (SC) formulation:-
• Charge Water (687.2gm) and Propylene glycol (100.0gm) to reactor stirred well, then add JEEMOX-1269 (50.0gm) and Jemol D-245 (10.0gm) to reactor and stir the mixture well till complete homogenization of the mass.
• Add Chlorantraniliprole (55.0gm) to above mass in liquid form under stirring and maintain the mass till complete dissolution under stirring.
• Abamectin (17.8 gm) added to the above stirred mass and stirred well till mass gets well mixed, this mass is transferred to bed mill for grinding of mass till required particle size (NMT 10µm) achieved.
• Add 2% Xantham gum solution (50.0gm), Silicon defomer (20.0gm) and Formaldehyde (10.0gm) to above stirred mass and maintain for 120 minute.
More preferably the suspension concentrate formulation for the present insecticidal composition comprises and not limited to depict in following table:
Table-4:-
S.No. Component / Ingredients % Quantity (w/w)
1. Chlorantraniliprole 1-10%
2. Abamectin 0.1-5%
3. Jemol D-425 (Emulsifier) 1%
4. JEEMOX-1269 (Emulsifier) 5%
5. Propylene Glycol (Anti freezing agent) 10%
6. Silicon defoamer 2%
7. Formaldehyde (40% in water) 1%
8. Xanthum gum (2.0% solution in water) 5%
9. Water ( Q.S. ) 68.72%
Storage Stability study:
The stability data of formulation of Chlorantraniliprole (~5%) + Abamectin (~1.7%) suspension concentrate (SC) formulation prepared
Table-5:-
Specification Initial Heat Stability study at 54± 2OC for 14 Days Cold Storage stability study at 0 ± 2OC for 14 Days
Parameter In House
Description Off white to Light brown to colored viscous liquid. Complies Complies Complies
Chlorantraniliprole (A.I.Content ) 5 to 6 % w/w
(by HPLC) Complies Complies Complies
Abamectin
(A.I.Content ) 1.5 to 2.5 % w/w (by HPLC) Complies Complies Complies
Suspensibility Min 80 % Complies Complies Complies
pH. 4.5-9.0 Complies Complies Complies
Viscosity (cps) 300 to 500 cps Complies Complies Complies
Storage stability study was done for the suspension concentrate formulation prepared comprising Chlorantraniliprole (~5%) + Abamectin (~1.7%). The results were found to be satisfactory and this formulation is passing in all physicochemical properties.
Bio-Efficacy field trials:
Evaluation of bio-efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Chlorantraniliprole (~5%) + Abamectin (~1.7%) SC on Cotton, Tomato, Okra, Eggplant and Pigeon pea crops for the control of pest like Lepidoptera, Coleptera, Diptera, Isoptera, Mites, Leaf minors, Leaf suckers, Colorado beetles, Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm, Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Fruit borers & Caterpillars, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mite, Aphid.
Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC (Code:- C+A-01)
Objective:
(i) To determine the bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC against Lepidoptera, Coleptera, Diptera, Isoptera, Mites, Leaf minors, Leaf suckers, Colorado beetles, Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm, Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Fruit borers & Caterpillars, Fruit Borer, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mite, Aphid.
(ii) To determine Phytotoxicity of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC on Cotton, Tomato, Okra, Eggplant and Pigeon pea crops.
Table-6:-
Details of Experiment
a) Test chemical Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
b) Crop Cotton, Tomato, Okra, Eggplant and Pigeon pea crops
C) Target insects Bollworm, Whitefly, Leaf Miner, Fruit borer, Corn borer, Aphids, Pod borer, Beetles
d) Plot size 3.0 m × 3.0 m
e) Design RBD (Randomized Block Design)
f) Treatment 7(Seven); Table 1
g) Number of reapplication 03
h) Application method Spray by knapsack sprayer fitted with flat fan nozzle
i) Water volume used 500 liters/ha
Table-7:-Treatment details for bio-efficacy of different insecticide
S. No. Treatment Dosage Formulation
(A.I. gm/ha)
1. Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC (1.0 ml) 25+8.5=33.5
2. Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC (0.8 ml) 20+6.8=26.8
3. Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC (0.6 ml) 15+5.1=20.1
4. Chlorantraniliprole 55% + Abamectin 5% SC (1.2 ml) 30+10.2=40.2
5. Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30.0
6. Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5
7. Untreated control (water only) -
Example-4: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Cotton Bollworm.
Table-8:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Bollworm
(15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 25 18.13 5.75 3.1 3.53 3.3 83.5%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 21 15.2 5.9 4.8 4.2 5.3 76%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 21 18 8.5 8.5 5.5 6.5 62%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 30 13.5 4.5 3.1 1.3 3.01 86.5%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 23 19.5 9.25 6.86 8.32 7.51 61%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 21 19.5 12.25 15.86 8.32 9.51 35%
Untreated control - 20 22.5 23 22.1 23 23.5 5%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 87, 89 per cent after 7 days and 86, 88.5 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Example-5: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Cotton Whitefly.
Table-9:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Whitefly (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 20 16.5 4.5 2.2 2.6 2.5 87.50%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 18 13.5 6.8 3.8 4.5 5.2 71%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 16 14.5 9.5 6.5 7.6 8.2 49%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 18
13 5.5 2.1 1.5 1.85 89.72%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 17 15 10.5 7.5 6.5 7.8 54%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 18 15.5 12 9.5 10 10.5 42%
Untreated control - 16 15.5 14.5 13 14.5 14.8 8%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 87, 97 per cent after 7 days and 87, 89 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Report of Phyto-Toxicity evaluation on Cotton crop
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of suspension concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% and Abamectin ~1.7% SC on 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha on Cotton crop.
Table-10:- Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample C+A-01 on Cotton crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Whereas, DAS= Days After spray
C+A-01=Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
Treatment:
T1= C+A-01 (25+8.5) F=1.0ml/L
T2= C+A-01 (20+6.8) F=0.8ml/L
T3= C+A-01 (15+5.1) F=0.6ml/L
T4= C+A-01 (30+10.2) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)
Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in Table-10. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on Cotton plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC is safe to use on Cotton crop at the dosage from 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha.
Example-6: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Tomato Leaf miner.
Table-11:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Leaf Minor (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 25 16.5 4.5 2.2 2.6 2.5 90.00%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 23 13.5 6.8 3.8 4.5 5.2 77%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 14.5 9.5 6.5 7 7.5 63%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 25 13 5.5 2.1 1.6 1.8 92.80%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 18 15 10.5 7.5 6.5 7 61%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 18 15.5 11.5 10 9.5 10.5 42%
Untreated control - 15 14.5 14.2 13.8 13 1.38 8%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 89, 93 per cent after 7 days and 90, 92 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Example-7: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Tomato Fruit borer.
Table-12:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Fruit borer (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 27 16.5 4.5 3.1 2.7 2.9 89.26%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 23 13.5 7.1 3.7 4.5 5.5 76%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 17 9.5 6.5 7.1 7.3 64%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 30 15 10.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 92.33%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 21 14.5 11 8.5 6.5 7.1 66%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 20 16 12.5 10 8.5 9.8 51%
Untreated control - 18 17.8 16.5 16 16.1 16.5 8%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 90, 91 per cent after 7 days and 89, 93 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Report of Phyto-Toxicity evaluation on Tomato crop
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of suspension concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% and Abamectin ~1.7% SC on 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha on Tomato crop.
Table-13:- Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample C+A-01 on Tomato crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Whereas, DAS= Days After spray
C+A-01=Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
Treatment:
T1= C+A-01 (25+8.5) F=1.0ml/L
T2= C+A-01 (20+6.8) F=0.8ml/L
T3= C+A-01 (15+5.1) F=0.6ml/L
T4= C+A-01 (30+10.2) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)
Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in Table-13. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on Tomato plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC is safe to use on Tomato crop at the dosage from 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha.
Example-8: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Okra Aphids.
Table-14:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Aphids (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 20 16.5 4.5 3.1 2.7 2.9 85.50%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 18 13.5 7.1 3.7 4.5 5.5 69%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 19 17 9.5 6.5 7.1 7.3 62%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 25 15 10.5 3.1 2.5 2.3 90.80%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 18 14.5 11 8.5 6.5 7.1 61%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 18 16 12.5 10 8.5 9.8 46%
Untreated control - 15 14.5 14 13.5 13 1.38 8%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 86, 90 per cent after 7 days and 85, 90 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Example-9: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Okra Fruit borer.
Table-15:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Fruit borer (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 27 16.5 4.5 3.1 2.7 3.1 88.52%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 23 13.5 7.1 3.7 4.5 5.8 75%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 17 9.5 6.5 7.1 7.3 64%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 30 15 10.5 3.1 2.5 2.7 91.00%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 21 14.5 11 8.5 6.5 7.1 66%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 20 16 12.5 10 8.5 9.8 51%
Untreated control - 18 17.8 16.5 16 15.5 15.5 14%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 90, 91 per cent after 7 days and 88, 91 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Report of Phyto-Toxicity evaluation on Okra crop
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of suspension concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% and Abamectin ~1.7% SC on 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha on Okra crop.
Table-16:- Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample C+A-01 on Okra crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Whereas, DAS= Days After spray
C+A-01=Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
Treatment:
T1= C+A-01 (25+8.5) F=1.0ml/L
T2= C+A-01 (20+6.8) F=0.8ml/L
T3= C+A-01 (15+5.1) F=0.6ml/L
T4= C+A-01 (30+10.2) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)
Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in Table-16. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on Okra plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC is safe to use on Okra crop at the dosage from 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha.
Example-10: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Eggplant Aphid.
Table-17:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Aphid (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 25 16.5 6.5 4 3.1 3.5 86.00%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 22 13.5 7.1 3.7 4.5 5.5 76%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 16 9.5 6.5 5.9 6.3 69%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 25 14.5 7.5 5.8 2.3 2.8 88.80%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 18 14.5 11.5 7.1 6.5 7.5 58%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 20 16 13.5 9.5 8.7 9.3 54%
Untreated control - 17 16 15.5 15.5 14.5 15.5 9%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 87, 90 per cent after 7 days and 86, 88 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Example-11: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Eggplant Pod borer.
Table-18:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Pod borer (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 22 16.5 5.8 3.5 2.6 2.7 87.73%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 20 14 8 4.5 3.8 4.3 79%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 18 14.5 8.5 7.1 6.5 7.2 60%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 25 13.5 7.5 2.8 2.1 2.3 90.80%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 18 15.5 11.5 8.5 7.5 7.7 57%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 17 16 1.3 7.5 7.4 7.9 54%
Untreated control - 15 14.5 14 12.5 13.5 13.5 10%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 88, 91 per cent after 7 days and 87, 90 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Report of Phyto-Toxicity evaluation on Eggplant crop
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of suspension concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% and Abamectin ~1.7% SC on 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha on Eggplant crop.
Table-19:- Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample C+A-01 on Eggplant crops:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Whereas, DAS= Days After spray
C+A-01=Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
Treatment:
T1= C+A-01 (25+8.5) F=1.0ml/L
T2= C+A-01 (20+6.8) F=0.8ml/L
T3= C+A-01 (15+5.1) F=0.6ml/L
T4= C+A-01 (30+10.2) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)
Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in Table-19. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on Eggplant plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC is safe to use on Eggplant crop at the dosage from 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha.
Example-12: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Pigeon pea Pod borer.
Table-20:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Pod borer (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 27 16.5 4.5 3.1 2.65 2.8 89.63%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 23 13.5 7.1 3.7 4.5 4.9 79%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 17 9.5 6.5 7.1 7.2 64%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 30 15 6 3.1 2.5 2.3 92.33%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 21 14.5 11 8.5 6.6 7.2 66%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 20 16 13 9.8 8.4 8.8 56%
Untreated control - 18 17 16.5 15.5 15.5 16 11%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 90, 91 per cent after 7 days and 89, 92 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Example-13: Bio-efficacy of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SE against Pigeon pea beetles.
Table-21:-
Treatments Dose gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Beetles (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.0ml/L) 25 + 8.5 25 16.5 8.5 3.1 2.8 3 88.00%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 6.8 23 13.5 8.5 4.5 3.1 5 78%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 5.1 20 17.5 9.5 8.5 7.1 7.5 63%
Chlorantraniliprole 5%+ Abamectin 1.7% SC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 10.5 26 14.5 7 5.5 2.1 2.5 90.38%
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC 30 20 18.5 10.5 9.5 6.5 7.3 63%
Abamectin 1.9% SC 9.5 17 15.5 11.5 9.5 6.5 7.3 57%
Untreated control - 15 15 14.5 14.5 13 12.5 17%
Results:
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 88, 91 per cent after 7 days and 88, 90 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 33.5 gm (a.i./ha) and Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC @ 40.2 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed systemic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 30 and Abamectin 1.9% SC @ 9.5 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
Report of Phyto-Toxicity evaluation on Pigeon pea crop
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of suspension concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Chlorantraniliprole ~5% and Abamectin ~1.7% SC on 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha on Pigeon pea crop.
Table-22:- Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample C+A-01 on Pigeon pea crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Whereas, DAS= Days After spray
C+A-01=Chlorantraniliprole ~5% + Abamectin ~1.7% SC
Treatment:
T1= C+A-01 (25+8.5) F=1.0ml/L
T2= C+A-01 (20+6.8) F=0.8ml/L
T3= C+A-01 (15+5.1) F=0.6ml/L
T4= C+A-01 (30+10.2) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)
Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in Table-22. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on Pigeon pea plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Chlorantraniliprole 5% + Abamectin 1.7% SC is safe to use on Pigeon pea crop at the dosage from 33.5, 26.8, 20.1 & 40.2 gm/ha.
,CLAIMS:CLAIMS:
We claim;
[CLAIM 1]. The suspension concentrate formulation of stable and synergistic insecticidal composition comprises:
a) component (A) Chlorantraniliprole in a range between 1% to 10%w/w/;
b) component (B) is Abamectin in a range between 0.1% to 5%w/w;
c) anti-freeze agent in an amount of 0.1-8% w/w;
d) Emulsifier in an amount of 0.1-8% w/w;
e) antifoam agent in an amount of 0.1-5% w/w;
f) stabilizing agent in an amount of 0.1-5% w/w;
g) viscosity agent in an amount of 0.1-8% w/w.
[CLAIM 2]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the process for the preparation of the suspension concentrate, comprising step off:
a) Forming the aqueous solution comprising of wetting and dispersing agent or emulsifier;
b) An aqueous dispersion (suspension concentrate, SC) of Chlorantraniliprole in amount of 1% to 10% (w/w), mixture of Chlorantraniliprole with of anti-freezing agent, antifoam agent and emulsifier in water;
c) An aqueous dispersion (suspension concentrate, SC) of Abamectin in a range between 0.1% to 5% (w/w) with emulsifier in water;
d) One or more additives selected from the group consisting of non-ionic or anionic surfactants or dispersing aids.
e) Wet grinding of the suspension in pressurized bead mill to reduce particle size of the suspension up to D90 less than 10 micron.
f) Mixing of components of formulation into formulation to prepared suspension concentrate (SC) formulation.
g) Finally adding the stabilizing agent /viscosity agent & preservative to the suspension concentrate (SC) to enhance viscosity
[CLAIM 3]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, where in solvent is water or organic solvent.
[CLAIM 4]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein emulsifier or dispersing agent is selected from a group comprising of Jemol D-425, JEEMOX-1269, Agrilan 788, 500 L,Q, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylalcohol, lingo sulphonates,phenyl naphthalene sulphonates, phenyl naphthalene sulphonates,ethoxykated alkyl phenols, ethoxylated fatty acids, alkoxylated linearalcohols, polyaromaticsulphonates, glyceryl esters, maleic anhydridecopolymers, phosphate esters, condensation products of arylsulphonic acids and formaldehyde, addition product of ethylene oxide and fatty acid esters, lignin derivatives, naphthalene formaldehydecondensates, sodium salts of isodecylsulfosuccinic acid half ester, polycarboxylates, sodium alkylbenesulfonates, sodium salts of sulfonated naphthalene, ammonium salts of sulfonated naphthalene,salts of polyacrylic acids, salts of phenolsulfonic acids and salts of naphthalene sulfonic acids.
[CLAIM 5]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 5, wherein emulsifier are are slected from Jemol D-425, JEEMOX-1269, Agrilan 788, 500L,Q.
[CLAIM 6]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein anti-freezing agent selected from a group comprising of propylene glycol, polyol, polyvinyl alcohols, phenyl naphthalene sulphonate, lignin derivatives, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyalkyl pyrrolidone, carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, polyethoxylated, fatty acids, polyethoxylated fatty alcohols, ethylene oxide copolymer, propylene oxide copolymer, polyethylene glycols and polyethylene oxides.
[CLAIM 7]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 8, wherein anti-freezing agent is Preferably propylene glycol.
[CLAIM 8]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein viscosity agent is a group comprising polyvinyl alcohols, phenyl naphthalene sulphonate, lignin derivatives, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyalkyl pyrrolidone, carboxy methyl cellulose, xanthan gum, polyethoxylated, fatty acids, polyethoxylated fatty alcohols, ethylene oxide copolymer, propylene oxide copolymer, polyethylene glycols and polyethylene oxides.
[CLAIM 9]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 11, wherein viscosity agent is selected from the group consisting of natural polysaccharides.
[CLAIM 10]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 12, wherein viscosity agent is preferably Xanthan Gum.
[CLAIM 11]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein anti foam/deforming agent is silicon or alcohol based antifoam agent.
[CLAIM 12]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 15, wherein anti foam /deforming agent is selected from the group consisting of silicon based.
[CLAIM 13]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein fillers is water.
[CLAIM 14]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein Particle size D(50) is 1.0-5.0 µm & D(90) is 3.0 -10.0 µm.
[CLAIM 15]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein Viscosity is 300cps to 550cps.
[CLAIM 16]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein synergistic composition comprises:
i. Chlorantraniliprolein a range between 1-10%w/w;
ii. Abamectin in a range between 0.1-5% w/w;
iii. Antifreezing Agent is Propylene glycol in a range between 0.1-8% w/w;
iv. Aqueous/ organic solvent in a range between 0-15% w/w;
v. Emulsifier in a range between 0.1-8% w/w;
vi. Dispersing agentin a range between 0.1-5% w/w;
vii. Water Q.S.
viii. Deforming Agent in a range between 0.1-5% w/w;
ix. Stabilizer (Formaldehyde) in a range between 0.1-5% w/w;
x. Viscosity Agent (Gum, Xanthan) in a range between 0.1-8.0% w/w.
[CLAIM 17]. The suspension concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 21, wherein synergistic Chlorantraniliprole (~5%) and Abamectin (~1.7%) Particle size is:-
i. D(10) = 0.595µm
ii. D(50) = 2.216µm
iii. D(90) = 6.466µm
iv. D(100) = 13.423µm
Dated this 23 day of December, 2020
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 201921025957-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 2 | 201921025957-PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 3 | 201921025957-POWER OF AUTHORITY [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 4 | 201921025957-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY(FORM-28) [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 5 | 201921025957-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 6 | 201921025957-FORM 1 [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 7 | 201921025957-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI(FORM-28) [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 8 | 201921025957-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 9 | 201921025957-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [28-06-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-06-28 |
| 10 | 201921025957-ORIGINAL UR 6(1A) FORM 1, FORM 3, FORM 5, FORM 26 & FORM 28-040719.pdf | 2019-10-18 |
| 11 | 201921025957-PostDating-(20-06-2020)-(E-6-138-2020-MUM).pdf | 2020-06-20 |
| 12 | 201921025957-APPLICATIONFORPOSTDATING [20-06-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-06-20 |
| 13 | 201921025957-PA [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 14 | 201921025957-FORM28 [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 15 | 201921025957-FORM FOR STARTUP [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 16 | 201921025957-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 17 | 201921025957-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 18 | 201921025957-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [25-08-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-08-25 |
| 19 | 201921025957-ENDORSEMENT BY INVENTORS [28-12-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-12-28 |
| 20 | 201921025957-CORRESPONDENCE-OTHERS [28-12-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-12-28 |
| 21 | 201921025957-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [28-12-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-12-28 |
| 22 | 201921025957-FORM-9 [16-07-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-07-16 |
| 23 | 201921025957-STARTUP [29-07-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-07-29 |
| 24 | 201921025957-FORM28 [29-07-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-07-29 |
| 25 | 201921025957-FORM 18A [29-07-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-07-29 |
| 26 | 201921025957-ORIGINAL UR 6(1A) FORM 1,3,5,26 ,28 & ASSIGNMENT-051020.pdf | 2021-10-19 |
| 27 | 201921025957-FER.pdf | 2021-10-19 |
| 28 | 201921025957-FER_SER_REPLY [26-03-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-03-26 |
| 29 | 201921025957-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 30 | 201921025957-POA [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 31 | 201921025957-PA [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 32 | 201921025957-FORM28 [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 33 | 201921025957-FORM 13 [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 34 | 201921025957-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 35 | 201921025957-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [25-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-25 |
| 36 | 201921025957-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-02-02-2023).pdf | 2023-01-18 |
| 37 | 201921025957-Correspondence to notify the Controller [29-01-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-01-29 |
| 38 | 201921025957-Written submissions and relevant documents [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 39 | 201921025957-POA [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 40 | 201921025957-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 41 | 201921025957-FORM 13 [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 42 | 201921025957-Annexure [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 43 | 201921025957-AMMENDED DOCUMENTS [17-02-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-02-17 |
| 44 | 201921025957-PatentCertificate27-02-2023.pdf | 2023-02-27 |
| 45 | 201921025957-IntimationOfGrant27-02-2023.pdf | 2023-02-27 |
| 46 | 201921025957-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY [31-07-2025(online)].pdf | 2025-07-31 |
| 47 | 201921025957-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [31-07-2025(online)].pdf | 2025-07-31 |
| 48 | 201921025957-FORM-27 [20-09-2025(online)].pdf | 2025-09-20 |
| 49 | 201921025957-FORM-27 [20-09-2025(online)]-1.pdf | 2025-09-20 |
| 1 | PatseersearchE_03-09-2021.pdf |