DESC:FIELD OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to synergistic insecticidal compositions comprising bioactive amounts of (A) at least one insecticide from organophosphorus group; (B) Indoxacarb or a salt or adduct thereof. The present invention further relates to process of preparing said composition along with at least one inactive excipients and formulation thereof.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Insecticides are the substances or the substance mixtures, which are used in order to inhibit, control or reduce the damage of crops done by insects. Insecticides may be a chemical substance, a biological agent such as virus or bacteria, an antimicrobial agent, a disinfectant or any other agent. Since most of the chemical insecticides are unable to exhibit an activity selective for the target organism, they may at the same time cause various side (adverse) effects on the organisms other than the targeted organism or even the death of the same. Many insecticides are also harmful for the human. They cause common diseases and undesirable problematic conditions in the humans as a result of the consumption of the living beings to which they are applied as a food by the humans.

Profenofos is an insecticide and acarcide of the organophosphorus class. Profenofos is being introduced world-wide by Ciba-Geigy belonging to a selective insecticides featuring a novel mode of action to control a range of insects of Lepidoptera and mites species.

Profenofos is a non systemic insecticide / acarcide with contact and stomach action which inhibits cholinesterase (i.e. for chewing insect pest) causing translaminar effect and explained the outstanding profile of low mammalian toxicity. Profenofos is active on chewing pest insects primarily by ingestion and secondarily by contact. IUPAC name:- 4-bromo-2-chloro-1-[ethoxy(propylsulfanyl) phosphoryl] oxybenzene (CAS No:-41198-08-7) and having the following structure:

Indoxacarb is an oxadiazine insecticide and a methyl ester. It has a role as a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker. It has IUPAC name as methyl (4aS)-7-chloro-2-[methoxycarbonyl-[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]carbamoyl]-3,5-dihydroindeno[1,2-e ][1,3,4]oxadiazine-4a-carboxylate (CAS No:-173584-44-6 & 144171-61-9) and having the following structure:

Indoxacarb was developed by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & CO., US 5462938. Indoxacarb is a synthetic product belonging to oxadiazine group, which is a well-known agricultural chemical in the industry. It is a compound, which is effective on many insect species.
Indoxacarb inhibits sodium channels and certain subtypes of nicotinic receptors. Indoxacarb is oxadiazine pesticide used as broad spectrum insecticide to control pest, worm, caterpillars, weevils, leafhoppers, plant bugs, maggot, corn rootworm, apple maggot, corn rootworm adults, cockroaches, mites, fire ants, ants, crickets, etc. in vegetables, tree fruits, cotton, maize, sugar beet, soya beans, potatoes, tobacco, corn, soybeans, grapes, turf, lawns etc.
Indoxacarb is a voltage dependent sodium channel blocker in insect nerve cells, it act by contact and ingestion, affected insect cease feeding, with poor coordination, paralysis and ultimately death.
The synergistic composition has very advantageous curative, preventive and systemic insecticidal properties for protecting cultivated plants. As has been mentioned, said active ingredient composition can be used to inhibit or destroy the pathogens that occur on plants or parts of plants (fruit, blossoms, leaves, stems, tubers, roots) of different crops or useful plants, while at the same time those parts of plants which grow later are also protected from attack by such pathogens. Active ingredient composition has the special advantage of being highly active against diseases in the soil that mostly occur in the early stages of plant development.

Insecticides are the substances or the substance mixtures, which are used in order to inhibit, control or reduce the damage of crops from insects. Insecticides may be a chemical substance, a biological agent such as virus or bacteria, an antimicrobial agent, a disinfectant or any other agent. Since most of the chemical insecticides are unable to exhibit an activity selective for the target organism, they may at the same time cause various side (adverse) effects on the organisms other than the targeted organism or even the death of the same. Many insecticides are also harmful for the human. They cause common diseases and undesirable problematic conditions in the humans as a result of the consumption of the living beings to which they are applied as a food by the humans.

The formulation / combination of Insecticides manufacturers always search the ways for developing the mixture of insecticides in a way that is safer for the environment, humans and other non-targeted organisms and for formulating the same in a way that provides more effective and economical use against the targeted insects, or they receive the support from the academic institutions in this regard. The increasing environmental consciousness and the research conducted about the harmful effects of the chemicals have accelerated these efforts even further. Moreover, different combinations and different formulations are resorted to, in order to eliminate the situations such as the resistance to Insecticides, which is acquired for various reasons. The harmful effects of the Insecticides on the one hand and the health risks and economic losses caused by the insect insects on the other hand prompted the researches to seek a cheaper, safer and more effective Insecticide.

According to current practice, formulations of Profenofos and formulations of Indoxacarb individual molecules are used as formulations such as Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Suspo emulsion (EC), Water dispersible granules (WDG), Dispersible powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Wettable Powders (WP), Granule (GR), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsion, oil in water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Ultra low volume liquid (UL),oil based concentrates (ODC, OC, OD), etc. In this case, considerable resistance issues emerge with the continued applications of an Insecticide molecule and as a result, the desired result may not be achieved. In addition, undue economic losses and environmental pollution occur.

Furthermore, the combinations of Profenofos and Indoxacarb, is yet not known in the present the state of the art. The combinations / formulation comprising Profenofos and Indoxacarb that are used together in Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation according to the present invention have been observed to provide great efficacy at low dose, exhibit insecticidal and acaricidal action against the insects damaging the agricultural products and achieve the successful results, which were not possible to obtain previously with any Insecticide.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Therefore an aspect of the present invention provides an insecticidal composition comprising (A) at least one insecticide from organophosphorus group and (B) Indoxacarb as active compound or a salt or adduct thereof and one or more customary formulation adjuvants.
Accordingly, in a further aspect, the present invention provides a method of protecting a plant propagation material, a plant, parts of a plant and/or plant organs that grow at a later point in time against pathogenic damage or pest damage by applying to the plant propagation material a composition comprising an insecticidal composition defined in the first aspect.
As per one embodiment formulation for the an insecticidal composition is selected from Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Suspo emulsion (EC), Water dispersible granules (WDG), Dispersible powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Wettable Powders (WP), Granule (GR), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsion, oil in water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Ultra low volume liquid (UL).; and one or more customary formulation adjuvants such as dispersant, wetting agent, anti-foaming agent, biocides, anti-freezing agent, suspending agent, thickener, coating agent and buffering agent.
The remainder of the formulation is preferably wholly solvent but may comprise other materials, such as in/organic compounds/salts etc.
In an embodiment of the present invention the present insecticidal composition controls various insects in field crops, vegetables, oil seed and pulses, horticulture & forestry, Veterinary.
In an embodiment of the present invention the present insecticidal composition can be applied as a foliar spray, soil drenching, seed dressing, application as paste of the targeted plants/ trees, broadcasting.
Accordingly, in a first aspect, the present invention provides an insecticidal composition comprising (A) at least one insecticide from organophosphorus group; (B) Indoxacarb as active compound or a salt or adduct thereof and one or more customary formulation adjuvants and resulting formulation shows synergistic activity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The term "synergistic", as used herein, refers the combined action of two or more active agents blended together and administered conjointly that is greater than the sum of their individual effects.
"Bioactive amounts” as mentioned herein means that amount which, when applied treatment of crops, is sufficient to effect such treatment.
Therefore an aspect of the present invention provides an insecticidal composition comprising (A) at least one insecticide from organophosphorus group; (B) Indoxacarb or a salt or adduct thereof; and one or more customary formulation adjuvants; and one or more customary formulation adjuvants.
In an embodiment of the present invention organophosphorus group of insecticides are selected from Acephate, Azinphos methyl, Bromophos, Bromophos ethyl, Chlorphoxim, Chlorpyrifos, Chlorpyrifos-methyl, Chlorthiophos, Coumaphos, Crotoxyphos, Crufomate, Cyanofenphos, Cyanophos, Demeton, Demeton-O, Demeton-S, Demeton-S-methyl, Demeton-S-methylsulphon, Diazinon, Dichlofenthion, Dichlorvos, Dicrotophos, Dimefox, Dimethoate, Dioxabenzophos, Dioxathion, Disulfoton, Ditalmifos, Edifenphos, EPBP, EPN, ESP, Ethion, Ethopropos, Etrimfos, Famphur, Fenamiphos, Fenchlorphos, Fenitrothion, Fensulfothion, Fenthion, Fonofos, Formothion, Heptenophos, Isothioate, Isoxathion, Jodfenphos, Leptophos, Malathion, Mephosfolan, Methamidophos, Methidathion, Mevinphos, Monocrotophos, Naled, Omethoate, Oxydemeton-methyl, Parathion, Parathion-ethyl, Phenthoate, Phorate, Phosphamidon amide, Phospholan, Phoxim, Pirimiphos-ethyl, Profenofos, Propaphos, Prothiofos, Quinlphos, Schradan, Sulfotep, Sulprofos, Temephos, TEPP, Terbufos, Tetrachlorvinphos, Thiometon, Thionazin, Triazophos, Trichlorfon, Vamidothion.
Profenofos is an organic thiophosphate, an organophosphate insecticide, an organochlorine insecticide and a member of monochlorobenzenes. It has a role as an EC 3.1.1.7 (acetylcholinesterase) inhibitor, an acaricide and an agrochemical. It derives from a 4-bromo-2-chlorophenol.
It has an IUPAC name as 4-bromo-2-chloro-1-[ethoxy(propylsulfanyl) phosphoryl] oxybenzene and having chemical structure as follows:

Pesticides designed to control insects that are harmful to human/crops. The insects may be directly harmful, as those acting as disease vectors, or indirectly harmful, as destroyers of crops, food products, or textile fabrics. It is a Cholinesterase inhibitor, non-systemic insecticide & acaricide with contact & stomach action, exhibits a translaminar effect and has ovicidal properties.
Profenofos is orgnaophosphorus pesticide particularly used as insecticide on numerous food and feed crops, turf, ornamentals and residential sites. It is effective for control of insect and mites on cotton, maize, sugar beet, soya beans, potatoes, tobacco, etc.
Indoxacarb is an oxadiazine insecticide and a methyl ester. It has a role as a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker. It has IUPAC name as methyl (4aS)-7-chloro-2-[methoxycarbonyl-[4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl]carbamoyl]-3,5-dihydroindeno[1,2-e ][1,3,4]oxadiazine-4a-carboxylate and having the following structure:

Indoxacarb inhibits sodium channels and certain subtypes of nicotinic receptors. Indoxacarb is oxadiazine pesticide and a voltage dependent sodium channel blocker in insect nerve cells, it act by contact and ingestion, affected insect cease feeding, with poor coordination, paralysis and ultimately death and used as broad spectrum insecticide to control pest, worm, caterpillars, weevils, leafhoppers, plant bugs, maggot, corn rootworm, in vegetables, tree fruits, corn soybeans, grapes etc.
The synergistic composition has very advantageous curative, preventive and systemic fungicidal properties for protecting cultivated plants. As has been mentioned, said active ingredient composition can be used to inhibit or destroy the pathogens that occur on plants or parts of plants (fruit, blossoms, leaves, stems, tubers, roots) of different crops or useful plants, while at the same time those parts of plants which grow later are also protected from attack by such pathogens. Active ingredient composition has the special advantage of being highly active against diseases in the soil that mostly occur in the early stages of plant development.
The composition according to the invention can be applied to any and all developmental stages of pests. The pests may be controlled by contacting the target pest, its food supply, habitat, breeding ground or its locus with a pesticidally effective amount of the inventive mixtures or of compositions comprising the mixtures.
The novel active ingredient composition has very advantageous curative, preventive and systemic insecticidal properties for protecting cultivated plants. As has been mentioned, said active ingredient composition can be used to inhibit or destroy the pests that occur on plants or parts of plants (fruit, blossoms, leaves, stems, tubers, roots) of different crops or useful plants, while at the same time those parts of plants which grow later are also protected from attack by such pathogens. Active ingredient composition has the special advantage of being highly active against diseases in the soil that mostly occur in the early stages of plant development.
It controls insects pests from the following orders: Lepidoptera, for example Agrotis ypsilon, Anticarsia gemmatalis, Chilo partellus, Cnaphalocrosis medinalis, Cydia pomonella, Diaphania nitidalis, , Earias insulana, Elasmopalpus lignosellus, Heliothis armigera, Heliothis virescens, Heliothis zea, Hellula undalis, Hyphantria cunea, Hyponomeuta malinellus, Leucoptera coffeella, Leucoptera scitella, Ostrinia nubilalis, Panolis flammea, Pectinophora gossypiella, Peridroma saucia, Phalera bucephala, Phthorimaea operculella, Phyllocnistis citrella, Pieris bras-sicae, Plutella xylostella, Sitotroga cerealella, Sesamia inferans, Sparganothis pilleriana, Spodoptera frugiperda, Spodoptera littoralis, Spodoptera litura, Thaumatopoea pityocampa, Tortrix viridana, Trichoplusia ni, beetles (Coleoptera), for example Agrilus sinuatus, Agriotes lineatus, Agriotes obscu-rus, Amphimallus solstitialis, Anisandrus dispar, Anthonomus grandis, Anthonomus pomorum, Aphthona euphoridae, Apogonia aerea, Athous haemorrhoidalis, Atomaria linearis, Blasto-phagus piniperda, Blitophaga undata, Brahmina coriacea , Bruchus rufimanus, Bruchus pisorum, Bruchus lentis, Byctiscus betulae, Cassida nebulosa, Cerotoma trifurcata, Cetonia aurata, Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis, Ceuthorrhynchus napi, Chaetocnema tibialis, Conoderus vespertinus, Crioceris asparagi, Ctenicera ssp., Diabrotica longicornis, Diabrotica semipunctata, Diabrotica 12-punctata Diabrotica speciosa, Diabrotica virgifera, Epila-chna varivestis, Epitrix hirtipennis, Eutinobothrus brasiliensis, White grub species, Holotrichia consanguinea , Holotrichia serrata, Holotrichia longipennis, Hylobius abietis, Hypera brunneipennis, Hypera postica, Ips typographus, Lema bilineata, Lema melanopus, Lepidiota stigma, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Limonius califomicus, Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus, Melanotus communis, Meligethes aeneus, Melolontha hippocastani, Melolontha melolontha, Oberea (Obereopsis) brevis, Oulema oryzae, Ortiorrhynchus sulcatus, Otiorrhynchus ovatus, Phaedon cochleariae, Phyllobius pyri, Phyllotreta chrysocephala, Phyllophaga sp., Phyllopertha horticola, Phyllotreta nemorum, Phyllotreta striolata, Popillia japonica, Sitona lineatus and Sito-philus gran aria, flies, (Diptera), e.g. Atherigona orientalis, Atherigona soccata, Athalia lugen proxima, Dacus cucurbi-tae, Dacus oleae, Glossina palpalis, Haematobia irritans, Haplodiplosis equestris, Hippelates spp., Hylemyia platura, Hypoderma lineata, Leptoconops torrens, Leaf miner, Liriomyza sativae, Liriomyza trifolii, Lucilia caprina, Lucilia cuprina, Lucilia sericata, Lycoria pectoralis, Mansonia titillanus, Mayetiola destructor, Oscinella frit, Phorbia brassicae, Prosimulium mixtum, Rhagoletis cerasi, Sarcophaga sp., Simulium vittatum, Stomoxys calcitrans, Tabanus bovinus, Tabanus atratus, Tabanus lineola, and Tabanus similis, Tipula oleracea, and Tipula paludosa, thrips (Thysanoptera), e.g. Dichromothrips corbetti, Dichromothrips ssp , Frankliniella fusca, Frankliniella occidentalis, Frankliniella tritici, Scirtothrips citri, Scirtothrips dorsalis, Thrips oryzae, Thrips palmi and Thrips tabaci, termites (Isoptera), e.g. Calotermes flavicollis, Coptotermes formosanus, Heterotermes aureus, Leucotermes flavipes, Microtermes spp., Odontotermes, Reticulitermes flavipes, Reticulitermes virginicus, Reticulitermes lucifugus and Termes natalensis; true bugs (Hemiptera), e.g. Acrosternum hilare, Amrasca biguttula biguttula, Amrasca devastans, Blissus leucopterus, Dysdercus cingulatus, Eurygaster integriceps, Euschistus impictiventris, Leptoglossus phyllopus, Lygus lineolaris, Lygus pratensis, Nezara viridu-la, Piesma quadrata, Solubea insularis , Thyanta perditor, Acyrthosiphon onobrychis, Adelges laricis, Aphidula nasturtii, Aphis fabae, Aphis forbesi, Aphis pomi, Aphis gossypii, Aphis crassivora, Aphis grossulariae, Aphis schneideri, Aphis spiraecola, Aphis sambuci, Acyrtho-siphon pisum, Aulacorthum solani, Bemisia argentifolii, Bemisia tabaci, Brachycaudus cardui, Brachy-caudus helichrysi, Brachycaudus persicae, Brachycaudus prunicola, Brevicoryne brassicae, Capitophorus horni, Cerosipha gossypii, Chaetosiphon fragaefolii, Cryptomyzus ribis, Dreyfusia nordmannianae, Dreyfusia piceae, Dysaphis radicola, Dysaulacorthum pseudosolani, Dysaphis plantaginea, Dysaphis pyri, Empoasca fabae, Hyalopterus pruni, Hyperomyzus lactucae, Macrosiphum avenae, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, Ma-crosiphon rosae, Megoura viciae, Melanaphis pyrarius, Metopolophium dirhodum, My-zus persicae, Myzus ascalonicus, Myzus cerasi, Myzus varians, Nasonovia ribis-nigri, Nilaparvata lugens, Pemphigus bursarius, Perkinsiella saccharicida, Phorodon humuli, Psylla mail, Psylla piri, Rhopalomyzus ascalonicus, Rhopalosiphum maidis, Rhopalosi-phum padi, Rhopalosiphum insertum, Sappaphis mala, Sappaphis mail, Schizaphis graminum, Schizoneura lanuginosa, Sitobion avenae, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Toxoptera aurantiia d, Viteus vitifolii, Cimex lectularius, Cimex hemipterus, Reduvius senilis, Triatoma spp., and Arilus critatus, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, Amrasca biguttula, Empoasca spp., Myzus spp., Nephotettix spp., Nilaparvata spp., Planococcus spp., Pseudococcus spp., Psylla spp., Rhopalosiphum spp., Sitobion spp., Amritodus atkinsoni, Idioscopus spp., ants, bees, wasps, sawflies (Hymenoptera), e.g. Athalia rosae, Atta cephalotes, Atta capiguara, Atta cephalotes, Atta laevigata, Atta robusta, Atta sexdens, Atta texana, Crematogaster spp., Hoplocampa minuta, Hoplocampa testudinea, Monomorium pha-raonis, Solenopsis geminata, Solenopsis invicta, Solenopsis richteri, Solenopsis xyloni, Pogonomyrmex barbatus, Pogonomyrmex californicus, Pheidole megacephala, Dasy-mutilla occidentalis, Bombus spp. Vespula squamosa, Paravespula vulgaris, Paraves-pula pennsylvanica, Paravespula germanica, Dolichovespula maculata, Vespa crabro, Polistes rubiginosa, Camponotus floridanus, and Linepithema humile, crickets, grasshoppers, locusts (Orthoptera), e.g. Acheta domestica, Gryllotalpa gryllo-talpa, Locusta migratoria, Melanoplus bivittatus, Melanoplus femurrubrum, Melanoplus mexicanus, Melanoplus sanguinipes, Melanoplus spretus, Nomadacris septemfasciata, Schistocerca americana, Schistocerca gregaria, Dociostaurus maroccanus, Tachycines asynamorus, Oedaleus senegalensis, Zonozerus variegatus, Hieroglyphus daganensis, Kraussaria angulifera, Calliptamus italicus, Chortoicetes terminifera, and Locustana pardalina, plant parasitic nematodes such as root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne arenaria, Meloidogyne incognita, Meloidogyne javanica; cyst nematodes, Globodera rostochiensis, Heterodera avenae; seed gall nematodes, Anguina funesta, Anguina tritici and other Anguina species; stem and foliar nematodes, Aphelenchoides besseyi, sting nematodes, Belonolaimus longicaudatus and other plant parasitic nematode species.
Suitable targets for seed treatment are various crop seeds, fruit species, vegetables, spices and ornamental seed, for example corn/maize (sweet and field), durum wheat, soybean, Groundnut, wheat, barley, oats, rye, triticale, bananas, rice, cotton, sunflower, potatoes, pasture, alfalfa, grasses, turf, sorghum, rapeseed, Brassica spp., sugar beet, egg-plants, tomato, lettuce, iceberg lettuce, pepper, cucumber, squash, melon, bean, dry-beans, peas, leek, garlic, onion, cabbage, carrot, tuber such as sugar cane, tobacco, coffee, turf and forage, cruciferous, cucurbits, grapevines, pepper, fodder beet, oil seed rape, pansy, impatiens, petunia and geranium.
The composition of the present invention is effective for management of insect or pests in of Cotton (Gossypium spp.), Paddy (Oryza sativa), Wheat (Triticumaestavum), Barley (Hordeumvulgare), Maize (Zea mays), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), Sugarcane (Saccharumofficinarum) , Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris), Soybean (Glycin max), Peanut (Arachishypogaea), Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) , Mustard (Brassica juncea), Rape seed (Brassica napus), Linseed (Linumusitatissimum), Sesame (Sesamumindicum), Castor (Ricinuscommunis), Green gram (Vigna radiate), Black gram (Vignamungo), Chickpea (Ciceraritinum), Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata), Redgram (Cajanuscajan), Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris), Indian bean (Lablab purpureus), Horse gram (Macrotylomauniflorum), Field pea (Pisumsativum), Cluster bean (Cyamopsistetragonoloba), Lentils (Lens culinaris), Brinjal (Solanum melongena), Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata), Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), Onion (Allium cepa L.), Tomato (Solanumlycopersicun) , Potato (Solanumtuberosum) , Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), Chilly (Capsicum annum), Garlic (Allium sativum), Cucumber (Cucumissativus), Muskmelons (Cucumismelo), Watermelon (Citrulluslanatus), Bottle gourd (Lagenariasiceraria), Bitter gourd (Momordicacharantia), Radish (Raphanussativus), Carrot (Dacuscarota subsp. sativus), Turnip (Brassica rapasubsprapa), Apple (Melusdomestica), Banana (Musa spp.), Citrus groups (Citrus spp.), Grape (Vitisvinifera), Guava (Psidiumguajava), Litchi (Litchi chinensis), Mango (Mangiferaindica), Papaya (Carica papaya), Pineapple (Ananascomosus), Pomegranate (Punicagranatum) , Sapota (Manilkarazapota), Tea (Camellia sinensis), Coffea (Coffea Arabica), Turmeric (Curcuma longa), Ginger (Zingiberofficinale), Cumin (Cuminumcyminum), Fenugreek (Trigonellafoenum-graecum), Fennel (Foeniculumvulgare), Coriander (Coriandrumsativum), Ajwain (Trachyspermumammi), Psyllium (Plantago ovate), Black Pepper (Piper nigrum), Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana), Safedmusli (Chlorophytumtuberosum), Drum stick (Moringaoleifera), Coconut (Coco nucifera), Mentha ( Mentha spp.), Rose (Rosa spp.), Jasmine (Jasminum spp.), Marigold ( Tagetes spp.), Common daisy (Bellisperennis), Dahlia (Dahlia hortnesis), Gerbera ( Gerbera jamesonii), Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) or GMO form thereof.
The composition of the present invention can be used to control the insects-pests belongs to Lepidopteran insects, Chilopartellus, Chilosuppressalis, Cydiapomonella, Plutellaxylostella, Peirisrapae, beetles (coleopteran), e.g. Dicladispaarmigera, Phyllotretanemorum, Phyllotretastriolata, flies (Diptera), e.g. Atherigonaorientalis, Dacuscucurbi-tae, Dacusoleae, Liriomyzasativae, Liriomyzatrifolii, Melanagromyza obtuse, Ophiomyiaphaseli, thrips (Thysanoptera), e.g. Frankliniellaoccidentalis, Scirtothripscitri, Scirtothrips dorsalis, Thrips oryzae, Thrips palmi and Thrips tabaci, true bugs (Hemiptera), e.g. Amrascabiguttulabiguttula, Amrascadevastans, Amritodusatkinsoni, Aphis fabae, Aphis pomi, Aphis gossypii, Aphis crassivora, Bemisiaargentifolii, Bemisiatabaci, Brevicorynebrassicae, Clavigrallagibbosa, Dysdercuscingulatus, Idioscopus spp., Leptocorisaacuta, Lyguslineolaris, Myzuspersicae, Nilaparvatalugens, Nephotettixvirescens, Nephotettixnigropictus, Planococcus spp., Pseudococcus spp., Pyrillaperpusilla, Psylla mail, Psyllapiri, Rhopalomyzusascalonicus, Rhopalosiphummaidis, Rhopalosi-phumpadi, Rhopalosiphuminsertum, Sappaphis mala, Sappaphis mail, Schizaphisgraminum, Schizoneuralanuginosa, Sitobionavenae, Sogatellafurcifera, Trialeurodesva- porariorum, Toxopteraaurantiia, Psylla spp., Rhopalosiphum spp., Sitobion spp., crickets, grasshoppers, locusts (Orthoptera), e.g. Gryllotalpagryllo-talpa, Locustamigratoria, Melanoplusbivittatus, Locustanapardalina., from the order Acarina, for example, Brevipalpus spp., Eriophyes spp., Olygonychuscoffeae, Panonychus spp., Polyphagotarsonemuslatus, Tarsonemus spp. and Tetranychus spp. (Tetranychusurticae, Tetranychuscinnabarinus, Tetranychustelarius).
The term "health of a plant" or "plant health" is defined as a condition of the plant and/or its products. As a result of the improved health, yield, plant vigor, quality and tolerance to abiotic or biotic stress are increased. Noteworthy, the health of a plant when applying the method according to the invention, is increased independently of the pesticidal properties of the active ingredients used because the increase in health is not based upon the reduced pest pressure but instead on complex physiological and metabolic reactions which result for example in an activation of the plant's own natural defense system. As a result, the health of a plant is increased even in the absence of pest pressure. Accordingly, in an especially preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention, the health of a plant is increased both in the presence and absence of biotic or abiotic stress factors. The above identified indicators for the health condition of a plant may be interdependent or they may result from each other. An increase in plant vigor may for example result in an increased yield and/or tolerance to abiotic or biotic stress.
One indicator for the condition of the plant is the yield. "Yield" is to be understood as any plant product of economic value that is produced by the plant such as grains, fruits in the proper sense, vegetables, nuts, grains, seeds, wood (e.g. in the case of silviculture plants) or even flowers (e.g. in the case of gardening plants, ornamentals). The plant products may in addition be further utilized and/or processed after harvesting.
In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the treated plant is increased.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.
According to the present invention, "increased yield" of a plant, in particular of an agricultural, silvicultural and/or horticultural plant means that the yield of a product of the respective plant is increased by a measurable amount over the yield of the same product of the plant produced under the same conditions, but without the application of the mixture according to the invention.
Increased yield can be characterized, among others, by the following improved proper-ties of the plant: increased plant, weight, increased plant height, increased biomass such as higher overall fresh weight, increased number of flowers per plant, higher grain yield, more tillers or side shoots (branches), larger leaves, increased shoot growth, increased protein content, increased oil content, increased starch content, increased pigment content, increased leaf are index. According to the present invention, the yield is increased by at least 4 %, preferable by 5 to 10 %, more preferable by 10 to 20 %, or even 20 to 30 % compared to the untreated control plants or plants treated with pesticides in a way different from the method according to the present invention. In general, the yield increase may even be higher.
A further indicator for the condition of the plant is the plant vigor. The plant vigor becomes manifest in several aspects such as the general visual appearance. In another especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant vigor of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant vigor of the plants treated according to the method of the invention is increased synergistically. Improved plant vigor can be characterized, among others, by the following improved properties of the plant: improved vitality of the plant, improved plant growth, improved plant development, improved visual appearance, improved plant stand (less plant verse/lodging), improved emergence, enhanced root growth and/or more developed root system, enhanced nodulation, in particular rhizobial nodulation, bigger leaf blade, bigger size, increased plant weight, increased plant height, increased tiller number, increased number of side shoots, increased number of flowers per plant, increased shoot growth, increased root growth (extensive root system), increased yield when grown on poor soils or unfavorable climate, enhanced photosynthetic activity (e.g. based on increased stomata conductance and/or increased CO2 assimilation rate), increased stomata conductance, increased CO2 assimilation rate, enhanced pigment content (e.g. chlorophyll content), earlier flowering, earlier fruiting, earlier and improved germination, earlier grain maturity, improved self-defense mechanisms, improved stress tolerance and resistance of the plants against biotic and abiotic stress factors such as fungi, bacteria, viruses, insects, heat stress, cold stress, drought stress, UV stress and/or salt stress, less non-productive tillers, less dead basal leaves, less input needed (such as fertilizers or water), greener leaves, complete maturation under shortened vegetation periods, less fertilizers needed, less seeds needed, easier harvesting, faster and more uniform ripening, longer shelf-life, longer panicles, delay of senescence, stronger and/or more productive tillers, better extractability of ingredients, improved quality of seeds (for being seeded in the following seasons for seed production), better nitrogen uptake, improved reproduction, reduced production of ethylene and/or the inhibition of its reception by the plant.
The improvement of the plant vigor according to the present invention particularly means that the improvement of any one or several or all of the above mentioned plant characteristics are improved independently of the pesticidal action of the mixture or active ingredients (components).
Another indicator for the condition of the plant is the "quality" of a plant and/or its products.
In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the quality of the treated plant is increased.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the quality of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.
According to the present invention, enhanced quality means that certain plant characteristics such as the content or composition of certain ingredients are increased or improved by a measurable or noticeable amount over the same factor of the plant produced under the same conditions, but without the application of the mixtures of the present invention. Enhanced quality can be characterized, among others, by following improved properties of the plant or its product: increased nutrient content, increased protein content, increased content of fatty acids, increased metabolite content, increased carotenoid content, increased sugar content, increased amount of essential amino acids, improved nutrient composition, improved protein composition, improved composition of fatty acids, improved metabolite composition, improved carotenoid composition, improved sugar composition, improved amino acids composition, improved or optimal fruit color, improved leaf color, higher storage capacity, higher process ability of the harvested products.
Another indicator for the condition of the plant is the plant's tolerance or resistance to biotic and/or abiotic stress factors. Biotic and abiotic stress, especially over longer terms, can have harmful effects on plants. Biotic stress is caused by living organisms while abiotic stress is caused for example by environmental extremes. According to the present invention, "enhanced tolerance or resistance to biotic and/or abiotic stress factors" means 1) that certain negative factors caused by biotic and/or abiotic stress are diminished in a measurable or noticeable amount as compared to plants exposed to the same conditions, but without being treated with a mixture according to the invention and 2) that the negative effects are not diminished by a direct action of the mixture according to the invention on the stress factors, e.g. by its fungicidal or 10 insecticidal action which directly destroys the microorganisms or pests, but rather by a stimulation of the plants' own defensive reactions against said stress factors.
Formulation of the present invention can be in any of the formulations selected from Suspension Concentrate (SC), Suspo emulsion (SE), Water dispersible granules (WDG), Dispersible powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Wettable Powders (WP), Granule (GR), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Microemulsion (ME), Emulsion, oil in water (EW), Flowable concentrate (FS), Ultra low volume liquid (UL).
Further composition comprising A) at least one insecticide from organophosphorus group; (B) Indoxacarb and at least one further active compound or a salt or adduct thereof are present in the said composition in specific fixed ratio.
The present inventors believe that the combination of the present invention surprisingly results in a synergistic action. The combinations of the present invention allow for a broad spectrum of pest control and has surprisingly improved plant vigor and yield. The broad spectrum of the present combination also provides a solution for preventing the development of resistance.
The composition of the present invention in addition to bioactive amounts of active ingredients further comprises inactive excipients including but not limited to emulsifier, solvent, and stabilizer.
The solvent for the formulation of the present invention may include polar, dipolar, non-polar, aromatic, cyclic, aliphatic, aqueous, protic, aprotic, oxygenated, nitrogenated and halogenated.
The process for preparing the present novel synergistic composition can be modified accordingly by any person skilled in the art based on the knowledge of the manufacturing the formulation. However all such variation and modification is still covered by the scope of present invention.
The present invention relates to the formulation comprising of composition of Profenofos and Indoxacarb.
According to the invention, the simultaneous presence of the Profenofos and Indoxacarb molecules owing to the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation generates a synergistic action as well as allowing the insecticide and acaricide actions to be obtained via a single product and resulting in a controlled long-time activity.

According to the invention, high insecticidal action as well as enhanced acaricidal action is achieved in a single combination. The studies demonstrating said action and the results of comparisons made with the existing formulations of the state of the art are presented to your attention in the examples.
By way of concomitant use of two molecules with different mechanisms of action (Profenofos is a organophosphorus insecticides, it is a cholinesterase inhibitor and Indoxacarb is effective as an voltage dependent sodium channel blocker in insect nerve cells), in a emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation, the invention controls the insects resistant to Profenofos group owing to the synergy of Indoxacarb, while controlling the insects resistant to Indoxacarb group owing to the synergy of Profenofos. The other types of formulations have a short duration of action and the insect control remains limited to a part of the life phases of the insects, it controls both the young hatching individuals (larvae and nymphs) and the adult individuals, in other words, all the phases. The invention also exhibits activity to control the next 2-3 generations, thereby demonstrating an extraordinary biological activity. In short, the invention is a combination that adds a new dimension to the insect pest control against the problems frequently caused worldwide by the insects with and without resistance. With the formulations of the state of the art, new Insecticide application is required against every generation of the Stem borer and leaf folder, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm , Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Fruit borer, Fruit borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Pod borers, Pod borers, Fruit borers & Caterpillars, Fruit Borer, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites and other plant insects in the spectrum, thus failing to enable an economical insect control due to the intensive labor involved and the great amount of Insecticide used.

In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the treated plant is increased.

In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.

According to the present invention, "increased yield" of a plant, in particular of an agricultural, silvicultural and/or horticultural plant means that the yield of a product of the respective plant is increased by a measurable amount over the yield of the same product of the plant produced under the same conditions, but without the application of the mixture according to the invention.

The invention optimizes the aforesaid benefit via the Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation. With the applications involving the formulation techniques other than Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation, the two molecules in free state will shortly disappear from the ambience due to the solar rays and other environmental factors (first Profenofos, then Indoxacarb). The shorter half- life of the molecule Profenofos than Indoxacarb will destroy the dual molecule action expected from the combination. The invention of Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation both molecules, thereby preventing them from being affected by the solar rays and other environmental conditions and providing the possibility to obtain the desired action from both molecules in the pest control.

A feature of the invention is that the formulations according to the invention are used for the control of the plant insects. The invention provides the possibility of control over Stem borer, Leaf folder, Aphids, Jassids, Diamond back moth, American bollworm, Spotted bollworm, Tobacco caterpillar, Termite, Early shoot borer, Top borer, Fruit borer, Fruit borer, Shoot & Fruit borer, Pod borer, Green Semi looper, Stem fly, Girdle beetle, Pod borers, Pod borers, White flys, Thrips, Fruit borers & Caterpillars, Fruit Borer, Red Spider Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Mites etc.
In another especially preferred embodiment of the invention condition of the plant by treatment with emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation of composition of Profenofos and Indoxacarb, the plant vitality of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the pest control of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically.

The improvement of the pest control according to the present invention a formulation of Profenofos and Indoxacarb particularly improves any one or several or all of the above mentioned plant characteristics are improved independently of the another indicator for the condition of the plant is the "quality" of a plant and/or its products.

In another preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a formulation of,
1) Profenofos;
2) Indoxacarb;
3) at least one or more inactive excipient.

In another preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a method for controlling harmful pest using a formulation of Profenofos (A), Indoxacarb (B) and at least one or more inactive excipient.

In another preferred embodiment of the invention relates to a process for preparation formulation of Profenofos (A), Indoxacarb (B) and at least one or more inactive excipient.

In another preferred embodiment of the invention composition of present invention can be in form of emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of the formulation of Profenofos and Indoxacarb is effective for management of pest control in following crops Rice, Cabbage, Cotton, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Tomato, Chilli, Brinjal, Pigeon pea, Soybean, Bengal gram, Black gram, Maize, Sugar beet, Potatoes, Tree fruits, Bitter gourd, Okra, Rose (Ornamental), Grapes etc.
One embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of the formulation of Profenofos and Indoxacarb have very good pesticidal properties and can be employed for controlling control of various pest such as pest, worm, mites, caterpillars, weevils, leafhoppers, plant bugs, maggot, corn rootworm, apple maggot, corn rootworm adults, cockroaches, fire ants, ants, crickets, etc.

EC is a formulation obtained by mixing of active ingredients Profenofos and Indoxacarb, surface active agents and if necessary other auxiliaries and granulating the mixture into a granule, and capable of disintegrating into a dispersion of fine particles when being diluted with water.

The present inventors have extensively studied to improve the emulsion of EC formulation, and as a result, have found that a EC having a high dispersion stability is obtained by using Profenofos (a.i.) 1-50 %w/w, Indoxacarb (a.i) 0.5-15 %w/w, Emulsifier/s 1-20 %w/w, Stabilizing agent 0.1-5 %w/w and Solvent 30-70/Q.S.%w/w. The present inventors thus completed the present invention.

Example 1: Chemical composition of Profenofos + Indoxacarb Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation:-

Table-1:

Component Name Unit Range (%)
Profenofos a. i. w/w 1-50%
Indoxacarb a.i w/w 1-25%
Emulsifier PX (Profeno X) w/w 1-10%
Emulsifier PY (Profeno Y) w/w 1-10%
Stabilizer (Isro proxy-P) w/w 0.1-5 %
Solvent (NMP) w/w 30-65 %
Total w/w

Advantages of the present invention:
The Emulsifiable concentrate insecticidal compositions of the present invention may show a broad spectrum activity against various insect-pest (for example, pest, worm, caterpillars, weevils, leafhoppers, plant bugs, maggot, corn rootworm, apple maggot, corn rootworm adults, cockroaches, mites, fire ants, ants, crickets, etc.) including insects resistant to chemicals, and shows excellent controlling effects (synergistic controlling effects) which could never be expected from a single component alone.
Also, it shows high plant insects controlling effects against existing insects resistant to chemicals, and no chemical damage against plants can be admitted.
It also shows activity against pest, worm, caterpillars, weevils, leafhoppers, plant bugs, maggot, corn rootworm, apple maggot, corn rootworm adults, cockroaches, fire ants, ants, crickets, etc.
The said emulsifiable concentrate insectidal composition may be useful but not limited onto the plants such as paddy, sugarcane, cotton, cabbage, chick pea, pigeon pea, cauliflower, tabacco, tomatoes, chilli, leafy vegetables, oil crops, soybean, flowering ornamentals vine crops and fruit trees.
Example 2: Profenofos (42.49%) + Indoxacarb (15.26%) Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation:
Table-2:
Sr.No. Raw Material Name Inputs Qty (gm)
1 Profenofos technical (Purity 94% w/w ) 42.49
2 Indoxacarb technical (Purity 98% w/w) 15.26
3 Emulsifier PX (Profeno X) 6.0
4 Emulsifier PY (Profeno Y) 6.0
5 Stabilizer (Isro proxy-P) 1.0
6 Solvent (NMP) Q.S.
Total Qty 100.00

Preparation of part-A: Process of Preparation of Profenofos (42.49%) + Indoxacarb (15.26%) Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation:-
Profenofos Technical (42.49g), Emulsifier PX (Profeno X) (6.0g), Emulsifier PY (Profeno Y) (6.0g), Stabilizer (Isro proxy-P) (1.0g), Solvent (NMP) (Q.S.) and Indoxacarb technical (15.26g) was added reactor and stirred for 10-30 minutes at room temperature (Temperature 30 ±5 OC).

STORAGE STABILITY DATA

Example 3: stability data of formulation of Profenofos (42.49%) + Indoxacarb (15.26%) Emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation (Example 2)

Table-3:

Specification Initial Heat Stability study at 54± 2OC for 14 Days Cold Storage stability study at 0 ± 2OC for 14 Days

Parameter In House ( crop life science ltd )

Description White to off white colored viscous liquid.
Complies Complies Complies
Profenofos (A.I. Content) 39.5 to 40.5% w/w
( by HPLC )
Complies Complies Complies
Indoxacarb
(A.I.Content) 14.0 to 15.0 % w/w ( by HPLC )
Complies Complies Complies
Emulsion stability Stable emulsion Pass Pass Pass
Cold test No turbidity & separation @10°C Pass Pass Pass
Acidity as H2SO4% w/w Passes to test Complies Complies Complies

The results were found satisfactory and this formulation is passing in all physicochemical properties.

Biological Examples:
Bio-field efficacy trial:
Evaluation of bio-efficacy and Phytotoxicity of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC on Cotton, Chilli, Soybean, Tomato, Rice, Cabage, Pigeon Pea, Chick Pea for the control of pests like Aphids, Thrips, Semi looper, Fruit borer, Leaf folder, Diamond back moth & Pod borer.

Example 4:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% SE (Code:- P+I-01)

Objective:
(i) To determine the bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Aphids, Thrips, Semi looper, Fruit borer, Leaf folder, Diamond back moth & Pod borer of Cotton, Chilli, Soybean, Tomato, Rice, Cabage, Pigeon Pea, Chick Pea crop.
(ii) To determine Phytotoxicity of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% SE on Cotton, Chilli, Soybean, Tomato, Rice, Cabage, Pigeon Pea, Chick Pea crop.
Table-4:
Details of Experiment
a) Test chemical Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
b) Crop Cotton, Chilli, Soybean, Tomato, Rice, Cabbage, Pigeon Pea, Chick Pea
C) Target pests Aphids, Thrips, Semi looper, Fruit borer, Leaf folder, Diamonv back moth, Pod borer, Fruit borer
d) Plot size 3.0 m × 3.0 m
e) Design RBD (Randomized Block Design)
f) Treatment 7(Seven); Table 1
g) Number of reapplication 03
h) Application method Spray by knapsack sprayer fitted with flat fan nozzle
i) Water volume used 500 liters/ha

Table-5: Treatment details for bio-efficacy of different insecticide:
SR. No. Treatment Dosage Formulation
(A.I. gm/ha)
1. Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (1 ml) 25+25= 50
2. Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (0.8 ml) 20+20=40
3. Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (0.6 ml) 15+15=30
4. Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (1.2 ml) 30+30=60
5. Profenofos 40% EC 30
6. Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50
7. Untreated control (water only) -

Example 5: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Cotton Aphids.
Table-6:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Aphids /leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 25 18.10 5.75 4.0 3.05 2.0 92%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 23 16.50 8.50 6.47 5.38 4.0 83%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 21 18.5 9.0 6.58 6.25 6.10 71%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 25 13.25 6.50 2.75 1.70 1.65 93%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 23 15.50 12.65 10.80 9.5 8.0 65%
Indoxacarb 15% EC 50 22 16.0 12.69 8.25 6.75 5.81 74%
Untreated control - 22 21.52 19.14 20.0 21.5 21.0 5%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 87.8, 89 per cent after 7 days and 92, 93 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON COTTON CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on cotton crop.
TABLE-7 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Cotton crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% SE
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 6: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Chilli Thrips.
Table-7:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Thrips/leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 28 19.6 7.0 5.60 4.2 2.3 92%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 25 19.0 9.5 6.5 5.25 4.5 82%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 21 17.82 8.5 7.6 7.5 7.45 65%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 28 14.0 6.16 3.08 1.68 2.1
93%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 25 18.0 14.5 11.85 10.28 8.64 65%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 25 19.02 8.25 6.6 6.3 6.5 76%
Untreated control - 21 20.68 19.14 19.82 20.38 19.98 5.0%
Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 85, 94 per cent after 7 days and 92, 93 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON CHILLI CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on chilli crop.
TABLE-8 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Chilli crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 7: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Soybean Semilooper.
Table-9:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Semi looper /leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 21 18.5
6.5
4.5 2.8 1.5 93%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 20 17.5 9.5 6.5 5.25 3.2 84%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 19 17.82 10.5 7.6 5.5 3.9 79%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC (F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 21 6.5
4.2 3.2 1.58 1.3
94%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 20 17.0 14.5 11.85 8.28 6.9 67%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 20 15.2 9.25 7.6 7.1 5.01 75%
Untreated control - 15 14.8 14.75 13.72 14.8 14.23 6.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 86, 93 per cent after 7 days and 93, 94 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON SOYBEAN CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on soybean crop.
TABLE-10 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Soybean crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 8: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Soybean Tomato fruit borer.
Table-11:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of fruit borer /leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5%
EC (F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 28 19.5 7.0 5.60 4.2 2.3 92%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 25 19.0 10.5 6.5 5.25 4.5 82%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 21 17.82 9.5 8.6 7.5 7.45 65%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 28 14.2. 6.16 3.08 1.68 2.11
93%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 25 18.10 14.5 11.85 10.28 8.64 65%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 25 19.02 8.25 6.65 6.63 6.54 76%
Untreated control - 21 20.67 19.14 19.82 20.38 19.98 5.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 85, 94 per cent after 7 days and 92, 93 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON TOMATO CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on tomato crop.
TABLE-12 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on tomato crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 9: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Rice leaf folder.
Table-13:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Leaf folder /leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 21 18.5
6.5
4.5 2.8 1.51 93%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 20 17.5 9.5 6.5 5.25 3.21 84%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 19 17.82 10.5 7.62 5.5 3.9 79%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 21 6.5
4.2 3.22 1.58 1.32
94%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 20 17.0 14.5 11.85 8.28 6.9 67%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 20 15.2 9.25 7.61 7.12 5.01 75%
Untreated control - 15 14.8 14.75 13.72 14.8 14.23 6.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 87, 93 per cent after 7 days and 93, 94 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.
REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON RICE CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on Rice crop.
TABLE-14 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Rice crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 10: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Cabbage diamond back moth.
Table-15:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Diamond back moth /leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 20 15.5 8.75 4.60 3.2 2.0 90%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 18 16.0 9.8 7.4 4.8 3.5 81%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 15 12.82 10.5 8.6 5.7 4.85 68%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 20 13.5 8.16 5.08 2.30 1.8
91%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 18 15.6 11.5 9.85 8.48 6.39 65%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 18 14.32 9.52 7.66 6.38 5.51 70%
Untreated control - 21 20.68 19.14 19.82 20.38 19.98 5.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 84, 89 per cent after 7 days and 90, 91 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON CABBAGE CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50, 40, 30 & 60 gm/ha on Cabbage crop.
TABLE-16 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Soybean Cabbage crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 11: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Pigeon pea pod borer.
Table-17:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of Pod borer/leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 28 19.59 9.8 5.63 4.2 2.3 92%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 25 19.0 10.95 6.55 5.52 4.55 82%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 23 17.82 8.5 8.3 8.15 7.98 65%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 28 13.5 6.16 3.08 1.68 2.1
93%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 25 17.8 15.4 12.85 10.28 8.64 65%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 25 19.02 8.25 6.6 6.3 6.5 76%
Untreated control - 21 20.68 19.14 19.82 20.38 19.58 7.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 85, 94 per cent after 7 days and 92, 93 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON PIEGEON PEA CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on Pigeon pea crop.
TABLE-18 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on pigeon pea crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Example 12: Bio-efficacy of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC against Chick pea fruit borer.
Table-19:
Treatments DOSE
Gm/ha Observed Value Before Spray Observed Value After Spray % Pest control
Mean of No. of fruit borer/leaf (15 leaves/ 5 Plants/ treatment)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
1 day 3 day 5 day 7 day 10 day
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1ml/L) 25 + 25 25 18.5 7.5 5.3 2.9 1.5 94%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.8ml/L) 20 + 20 23 19.0 9.5 6.5 5.2 4.2 83%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=0.6ml/L) 15 + 15 21 18.5 10.5 9.6 7.5 7.15 67%
Profenofos 40%+ Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
(F=1.2ml/L) 30 + 30 25 16.0 8.5 4.08 1.85 1.35
95%
Profenofos 40% EC 30 23 18.0 15.5 10.75 9.28 8.24 64%
Indoxacarb 14.5% EC 50 23 19.02 12.25 8.6 6.5 6.1 73%
Untreated control - 21 20.5 19.91 19.82 20.38 19.62 7.0%

Results:
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose were at as per they exhibited pest control 88, 93 per cent after 7 days and 94, 95 per cent after 10 days of spray.
Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 gm (a.i./ha) and Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 60 gm (a.i./ha) dose showed synergistic effect and significantly superior or standard check by separately Profenofos 40% EC @ 30 and Indoxacarb 14.5% EC @ 50 for control of pest after 7 and 15 days of spray.

REPORT OF PHYTO-TOXICITTY EVALUATION ON CHICK PEA CROP
Evaluation of phyto-toxicity effect of emulsifiable concentrate formulation of insecticidal composition of Profenofos 40% and Indoxacarb 14.5% on 50,40,30 & 60 gm/ha on Chick pea crop.
TABLE-20 : Symptoms of Leaf injury, Epinasty, Hyponasty, Necrosis, Vein clearing, Wilting before and after spraying of CLSL sample P+I-01 on Chick pea crop:
Treatment DAS of observation
Before spray 1 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS 7 DAS 10 DAS
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*DAS= Days After spray
C+P-01=Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC
Treatment:
T1= P+I-01 (25+25) F=1ml/L
T2= P+I -01 (20+20) F=0.8ml/L
T3= P+I -01 (15+15) F=0.6ml/L
T4= P+I -01 (30+30) F=1.2ml/L
T5 =Untreated control (Water only)

Conclusion:
Results of phyto-toxicity evaluation trial are given in tables. As per results we are concluded that different doses of Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC were cause minor phytotoxic symptoms on crops plant after the spraying, however plants are recover within 7-10 days of application. It may be due to phytotonic effect and weather effect Hence, it may be concluded that Profenofos 40% + Indoxacarb 14.5% EC is safe to use on above mention crops at the dosage from 50, 40, 30 & 60 gm/ha.
The present invention relates to an emulsifiable concentrate formulation of synergistic insecticidal composition comprising (i) Profenofos (A) and Indoxacarb (B) for plant pest control. More particularly, the present invention relates to an emulsifiable concentrate insecticidal composition with enhanced action for plant pest control, the said insecticidal composition comprises two active chemical compounds i.e. (i) Profenofos (A) and Indoxacarb (B). The present invention also relates to a process for the preparation of the above said emulsifiable concentrate composition for plant pest control.
,CLAIMS:CLAIMS:
We claim;
[CLAIM 1]. Emulsifiable concentrate formulation for insecticidal composition comprises:
a) Profenofos present in a range between 1% to 50 % w/w;
b) Indoxacarb present in a range between 1% to 25 % w/w;
c) Emulsifiers present in an amount of 0.1-20% w/w;
d) Solvent present in an amount of 0.1-50% w/w;
e) Stabilizing agent present in an amount of 0.1-5 % w/w.

[CLAIM 2]. The Emulsifiable concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein inactive excipients are selected from the group consisting of emulsifiers, solvent and stabilizers.

[CLAIM 3]. The Emulsifiable concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein solvent is selected from water, ethyl acetate, ethylene glycol, glycerine, heptane, hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA), Hexamethyl-phosphoroustriamide (HMPT), methanol, methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), Toluene, xylene, Acetone, Acetonitrile and Solvent C-9. Cyclohexanone, N-Methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), gamma-butyrolactone, Dimethyl formamide, Dimethyl sulfoxide, Methanol, dipropylene glycol, iophorone, butanol, Dimethyl isosorbide, Acetophonone.

[CLAIM 4]. The Emulsifiable concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 6, wherein emulsifier is selected from Profeno X (PX), Profeno Y (PY), Jemol D-425, Agrilan 788, 500L,Q) is in an amount of 0.1-20 % w/w.

[CLAIM 5]. The Emulsifiable concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein synergistic composition comprises:
i. Profenofos in a range between 1-50% ;
ii. Indoxacarb a range between 1-25% ;
iii. Organic solvent (NMP) in a range between Q.S.;
iv. Emulsifiers in a range between 0.1-20%;
v. Stabilizer (Isro proxy-P) in a range between 0.1-5%.

[CLAIM 6]. The Emulsifiable concentrate formulation as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the process for the preparation of the Emulsifiable concentrate formulation comprising step off:
a) Forming the solution comprising of solvent and active ingredients selected from organophsophorus compound and Indoxacarb
b) Where Profenofos is in amount of 1% to 50 % (w/w) and Indoxacarb in a range between 1% to 25 % , with stabilizer and emulsifier/s in solvent (Q.S.);
c) one or more water immiscible primary or co-solvents
d) Finally adding the stabilizing agent to the Emulsifiable concentrate (EC).

Dated this 30th day of October 2021