TITLE OF THE INVENTION: ALCOHOL-FREE WATERLESS (DRY) BODY BATH COMPOSITIONS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
Generally, the present disclosure relates to body bath compositions. Particularly, it relates to waterless (dry) body bath compositions. More particularly, it relates to alcohol-free waterless 5 (dry) body bath compositions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Bathing forms an essential part of daily routine for cleansing the body and removing dirt and germs. Bathing soaps and body baths are widely used worldwide for this purpose. Body baths can broadly be classified into two types: wet body baths which requires rinsing with water 10 and waterless (dry) body baths which do not require rinsing.
While wet body baths are quite efficient, they require the use of water, which is an extremely precious resource. Further, wet body baths compositions generally contain alcohol and other harsh chemicals, which can cause skin dryness and are harmful.
Waterless body bath, on the other hand, are a great way to reduce the use of water in 15 cleansing the skin and other body parts. Since no water is required, waterless (dry) body baths can be used even by people living in areas where water is scarce, including campers, backpackers, defence personnel in remote areas, and the like. These are also very useful in hospitals for providing a warm, comfortable patient-friendly bathing or sponging alternative (especially useful for bedridden patients). 20
However, existing waterless (dry) body baths are largely inefficient in removing body odour, dirt, sweat, and germs. Further, unlike wet body baths, they leave behind residue that is difficult to remove. Moreover, the presence of harsh chemicals may cause skin rashes, itching and pH imbalance, leading to other skin problems. Also the existing waterless (dry) body bath compositions contain strong fragrance and make the skin dry, which may not be suitable 25 for use on patients and the like. Due to these reasons, waterless (dry) body baths have not become popular with consumers.
There is therefore, a need in the art for a waterless (dry) body bath composition that does not contain alcohol and cleanses the skin and body parts completely without leaving behind any undesirable residue. 30
There is therefore, a need in the art for a waterless (dry) body bath composition that does not contain strong fragrance, is gentle on the skin (especially sensitive skin), moisturizes the skin, and makes the skin clean and soft.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In order to overcome the above mentioned drawbacks, alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath 35 compositions are disclosed, said alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions consisting of 85% to 95% of purified water as a solvent, 5.2% to 7.8% of a primary
3
surfactant, 0.4% to 1.8% of a secondary surfactant, 1.1% to 3.1% of an emollient , 0.065% to 0.08% a first preservative, 0.065% to 0.08% a second preservative, 0.065% to 0.08% a third preservative, 0.5% to 1.8% of a moisturizer, 0.025% to 0.08% of a modifier and 1% of a fragrance.
The primary surfactant is selected from the group consisting of Triethanolamine Lauryl 5 Sulfate, Alkyl Benzene Sulfonates, Lauric acid salts, Stearic acid, Alkyl Ether Sulfates, Coconut Amine Oxide, Dodecyl Dimethyl Amine Oxide and N-alkyl Amino acids.
The secondary surfactant is selected from the group consisting of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Coco Betaine, Lauryl Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Coco Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate, Cocamide MEA and Decyl Glucoside. 10
The emollient is selected from the group consisting of Glycerine and Lactic acid.
The first preservative is selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone.
The second preservative is selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl 15 Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone.
The third preservative is selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone. 20
The moisturizer is selected from the group consisting of Propylene Glycol, Glycerine, plant oils and Panthenol.
The modifier is selected from the group consisting of Citric acid and Sodium Hydroxide.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Unless otherwise specified, all the percentages disclosed are in w/v. 25
Alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions are disclosed, said alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions consisting of 85% to 95% of water as a solvent, 5.2% to 7.8% of a primary surfactant, 0.4% to 1.8% of a secondary surfactant, 1.1% to 3.1% of an emollient , 0.065% to 0.08% of a preservative, 0.5% to 1.8% of a moisturizer, 0.025% to 0.08% of a modifier and 1% of a fragrance. 30
In a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the solvent is purified water.
In an embodiment of the present disclosure, the primary surfactant is selected from the group consisting of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate, Alkyl Benzene Sulfonates, Lauric acid salts, Stearic acid, Alkyl Ether Sulfates, Coconut Amine Oxide, Dodecyl Dimethyl Amine Oxide and N-alkyl Amino acids. 35
4
In another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the principle surfactant is Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the secondary surfactant is selected from the group consisting of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Coco Betaine, Lauryl Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Coco Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate, Cocamide MEA and Decyl 5 Glucoside.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the secondary surfactant is Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the emollient is selected from the group consisting of Glycerine and Lactic acid. 10
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the emollient is selected from the group consisting of Glycerine.
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the first preservative is selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and 15 Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the first preservative is Methyl Paraben.
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the second preservative is selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, 20 Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the second preservative is Propyl Paraben.
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the third preservative is selected from 25 the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the third preservative is Diazolidinyl Urea. 30
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the moisturizer is selected from the group consisting of Propylene Glycol, Glycerine, plant oils and Panthenol.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the moisturizer is Propylene Glycol.
5
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the modifier is selected from the group consisting of Citric acid and Sodium Hydroxide.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the modifier is Citric acid.
The composition also contains a fragrance. The incorporation of fragrances in body baths is well established and those skilled in the art would be able to select a suitable fragrance to 5 achieve the desired scent.
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the fragrance is a natural fragrance (fragrant compounds that are derived from natural sources).
In yet another embodiment of the present disclosure, the fragrance is a synthetically produced fragrance. 10
In a more preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the disclosed alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions consist of 85% to 95% of purified water, 5.2% to 7.8% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate, 0.4% to 1.8% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 1.1% to 3.1% of Glycerine, 0.065% to 0.08% of Methyl Paraben, 0.065% to 0.08% of Propyl Paraben, 0.065% to 0.08% of Diazolidinyl Urea, 0.5% to 1.8% of Propylene Glycol, 0.025% 15 to 0.08% of Citric acid and 1% of a fragrance.
In a most preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, the disclosed alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath composition consist of 89.04% of purified water, 6.28% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate, 1% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 1.42% of Glycerine, 0.07% of Methyl Paraben, 0.07% of Propyl Paraben, 0.07% of Diazolidinyl Urea, 1% of Propylene 20 Glycol, 0.05% of Citric acid and 1% of a fragrance.
The process by which the compositions are manufactured consists of mixing the primary surfactant, the secondary surfactant and the emollient first in a vessel. The solvent, the first preservative, the second preservative and the third preservative are mixed in a separate vessel. The two mixtures are subsequently mixed together and cooled down. Finally, the 25 fragrance is added.
The disclosed alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions are to be used as given below:
1. Apply onto skin and other body parts until the area is completely wet;
2. Gently massage onto the body parts; 30
3. Dry the body parts thoroughly by wiping it with a soft towel;
4. Repeat the above steps for heavily soiled areas and skin folds.
The alcohol-free waterless (dry) body bath compositions disclosed herein leave behind no residue, maintain the smoothness and the pH of the skin, do not cause skin dryness, completely cleanse the skin by removing dirt, sweat, germs and odour, provide excellent 35 moisturizing effect and reduce the microbiological count.
6
For the examples disclosed below, the viscosity was tested using the below described procedure:
A quantity of oil (200C + 0.10) was placed in a filling tube and transferred to a capillary tube by gentle suction, taking care to prevent bubble formation in the liquid by keeping the air vent tube closed. The meniscus of the column of liquid in the capillary tube was adjusted to 5 the level of the top graduation line. Both the vent and the capillary tubes were opened in order to permit the liquid to flow into the reservoir against atmospheric pressure. The time, in seconds, for the liquid to flow from the upper mark to the lower mark in the capillary tube was recorded.
The viscometer constant, k, was calculated from the equation: 10
k = v/dt
where,
v is the known viscosity of the liquid in centipoise,
d is the specific gravity of the liquid tested at 200C, and
t is the time in seconds for the liquid to pass from the upper mark to the lower mark. 15
Example 1:
A composition consisting of 89.04% of purified water, 6.28% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate, 1% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 1.42% of Glycerine, 0.07% of Methyl Paraben, 0.07% of Propyl Paraben, 0.07% of Diazolidinyl Urea, 1% of Propylene Glycol, 0.05% of Citric acid and 1% of a fragrance was found to yield a clean and clear liquid having a good 20 viscosity and possessing a scent that is comparable to that of baby powder.
The results of stability tests conducted on the composition disclosed in Example 1 over six months are summarized in the table below:
Attribute
Acceptable Result
Initial Result
Result after a month
Result after 2 months
Result after 3 month
Result after 6 months
Appearance
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Clean, clear liquid with baby powder scent
Viscosity
About 1.6 centipoise (cps) at room
1.6 cps
1.58 cps
1.59 cps
1.61 cps
1.60 cps
7
temperature
pH at 25ºC
6.5 to 7.5
6.9
6.8
6.9
6.7
6.8
Microbial limits
 Total Aerobic microbial Count
 Total Mould and yeast count
 E.coli
 Salmonella
 Pseudomonas
NMT 100 cfu/ml
NMT 10 cfu/ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
< 19cfu/ml
< 1cfu/ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
NA
NA
< 20cfu/ml
< 1cfu/ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
< 21cfu/ml
< 2 cfu/ml
Absent
Absent
Absent
The pH was determined potentiometrically by means of a glass electrode and a suitable pH meter (digital). After setting the pH meter at 25ºC, the pH meter was standardized using standard buffer solutions of pH value 6.0 and 7.0. The pH of the body bath was then measured. 5
The microbial limits were determined using the below mentioned protocol.
Pre-treatment of the sample:
10 g of the preparation under examination was suspended in buffered sodium chloride- peptone solution (pH 7.0) or any other suitable medium shown to have no antimicrobial activity. The volume was adjusted to 100 ml with the same. A suitable surface active agent 10 such as 0.1% w/v solution of Polysorbate 80 was added (where required) to assist with the suspension of poorly wettable substances.
Inactivation of antimicrobial activity: For test specimens known to contain antimicrobial substances, a corresponding inactivating agent was used to neutralize the antimicrobial activity. The inactivating agent (Polysorbate 80) was added to the chosen diluent preferably 15 before sterilization.
All the necessary items required for the testing were kept under a laminar air flow (LAF).
The pre-sterilized petri dish was labelled with glass marker, to show the media name (soyabean casein digest agar (SCDA) for bacterial count or Sabouraud Dextrose agar (SDA) for fungal count), the name of the product, the batch number and the date of analysis. 20
Each of 1 ml of pre-treated sample was carefully pipetted onto previously labelled petri dish in duplicate, said petri dish being maintained under a laminar air flow.
8
Positive control: Known volume of cells (10-10 cells) of E.coli/ S.aureus was added in SCDA plate and allowed to solidify for 30 minutes s. Likewise, known volume of cells of Candida albicans was added in SDA plate allowed to solidify for 30 minutes.
Negative Control: SCDA/ SDA media was poured in pre-sterilized and labeled plates and allow to solidify. 5
The plates were incubated at respective temperatures (SCDA – 350C-370C/ SDA 200C – 250C) for 120 hours (5 days).
The incubated plates were monitored every 24 hours.
Calculation:
Average No. of colonies X Dilution factor 10
CFU / g = -----------------------------------------------------------
Weight of sample
It was ensured that the negative control did not show any growth at the end of the incubation period.
Pathogens test: The pathogens mainly comprise of E.coli, Salmonella, S.aureus and 15 P.aeruginosa.
Sample preparation: 10 gm sample was aseptically transferred into sterile 90 ml SCDM broth.
The media was labelled with the media name, the product batch number and the incubation date and incubated at 300C – 350C for 18- 24 hours. After the incubation, if the media was 20 clear, it was concluded that pathogens are absent. If turbidity was observed, then specific testing of pathogens was carried out as described below:
E.coli:
Primary test: 0.1ml of enrichment media was transferred into 10ml of MacConkey’s broth containing inverted Durham’s tube and incubated at 300C – 370C for 24 hours to 48 hours. 25
The tube was labelled to show enrichment transfers (SCDM to MacConkey broth), sample number and the date of enrichment and incubated at 300C – 370C for 24 hours.
After incubation, if Durhams tube showed gas and if a colour change to yellow occurred, then a loopful of the same was streaked on MacConkey agar plate and incubated for 24 – 72 hours at 300C – 370C. If no change was observed, then the testing was stopped. 30
Upon incubation, the plate was observed for typical culture characteristics of E.coli. If typical characteristics were found, then secondary test was conducted.
If no typical characteristics were found, the result was recorded as ‘Absent’ for E.coli.
9
Secondary test (Indole test):
0.5 ml kovac’s reagent was added in to pre- incubated 5 ml peptone water (1%).
After shaking, it was allowed to stand for 1 minute, the formation of a pink coloured ring was interpreted as a positive result.
5
The presence of acid and gas and of indole in the secondary test indicates the presence of E.coli.
Cultural characteristics of E.coli in MacConkey agar is as follows:
MacConkey agar plate
Brick red, colonies may have surrounding zone of precipitated bile.
Salmonella: 10
0.1 ml of primary enrichment from SCDM was aseptically transferred into 10 ml of sterilized Selenite-F-Broth or 10 ml of Tetrathionate Brilliant green Broth tube.
The tube was labelled to show the enrichment transfers (SCDM to SFB/ SCDM to TTBGB), product identification and date of Enrichment and incubated at 350C – 370C for 24 hours.
After the incubation period, if the SFB tube showed turbidity and the TTBGB tubes showed 15 disappearance of green colour with white precipitate, then loopful of enrichment was picked up and streaked on surface of pre-incubated Bismuth sulfite agar (BSA)/ Brilliant Green Agar (BGA) Media plates/ Xylose lysine Deoxycholate agar/ Deoxycholate agar plate. The plate was labelled to show enrichment transfers, (SFB to BGA/ SFB to BSA/ TTBGB to BSA) product identification and date of streaking. 20
Upon incubation, if the plate showed typical cultural characteristics of Salmonella, biochemical identification test was conducted to confirm the same.
Secondary test (TSI test):
Any colonies showing the typical characteristics were sub-cultured in triple sugar iron agar by first inoculating the surface of the slope with inoculating needle and then making a stab 25 cultures with the same inoculating needle.
These two tubes were incubated at 350C – 370C for 18 - 24 hours.
After incubation, yellow butt (acidic) with pink slant (alkaline), with or without concomitant blackening of butt from H2S production in TSI tubes indicated the presence of Salmonella. The cultural characteristics of Salmonella in media plates is as follows: 30
10
Sr. No.
Medium
Description of colony
1
Bismuth Sulphite agar
Black or green
2
Brilliant green agar
Small, transparent and colourless or opaque, pinkish or white (frequently surrounded by a pink or red zone)
3
Deoxycholate citrate agar
Colourless and opaque with or without black centres.
4
Xylose-lysine Deoxycholate agar
Red with or without black centres.
Test for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus):
Upon incubation, the growth was observed in tube. Loopful of enrichment was picked up and streaked on the surface of pre- incubated Mannitol Salt agar (MSA) media plate. Finally, the plates were incubated at 350C – 370C for 24 – 48 hours. 5
After the incubation period, the colony morphology was observed for typical cultural characteristics of S.aureus. If typical characteristics were observed, then the presence of S.aureus was confirmed by biochemical identification test.
Secondary test: The typical colony of S.aureus was streaked from Mannitol salt agar to Baired Parker agar and incubated at 350C – 370C for 24 - 48 hours. 10
After Incubation, the growth was examined for black colouration. If growth showed black colouration, it was interpreted to as a positive result. Cultural characteristics of S.aureus in MSA/ Baired parker agar plates is as follows:
MSA plate
Yellow colonies with yellow surrounding zone
Baired Parker agar plate
Black colonies surrounded by clear zone
Test for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P.aeruginosa): 15
Loopful of enriched SCDM broth was picked up and streaked on the surface of pre- incubated Cetrimide Agar (CA) media plate.
The plate was labelled to show the enrichment transfer, (SCDM to CA) product identification and date of streaking. Finally, the plate was incubated at 350C – 370C for 24 - 72 hours.
Upon examination, if none of the colonies conformed to the description given in following 20 table, it confirmed the absence of Pseudomonas.
11
Medium
Description of colony
Cetrimide
Greenish
If any colonies conformed to the description given in above table, oxidase test was carried out to confirm the presence of Pseudomonas.
Oxidase test:
An isolated colony was spread well on oxidase disc from Cetrimide agar plate. 5
The production of purple colour within 5 to 10 seconds indicated a positive result.
Example 2:
A composition consisting of 88% of water, 6% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulphate, 1% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 1% of Citric acid, 1% of Propylene glycol, 2% Glycerine and 1% Formaldehyde was found to be satisfactory. The composition produced reduced foam. 10 However, the foam could not be wiped off completely.
Example 3:
A composition consisting of 89% of water, 6% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulphate, 1% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 1% of Citric acid, 1% of Propylene glycol, 2% Glycerine was found to be satisfactory. The composition produced reduced foam. However, the foam could 15 not be wiped off completely.
Example 4:
A composition consisting of 85% of water, 9% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulphate, 5% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine and 1% of Citric acid was found to be satisfactory. The composition was less viscous and produced reduced foam. However, the foam could not be wiped off 20 completely and water was required to remove the foam.
Example 5:
A composition consisting of 80% of water, 10% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulphate, 9% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine and 1% of Citric acid was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition produced reduced foam, but was quite thick. Further, water was required to 25 remove the foam.
Example 6:
A composition consisting of 87.4% of water, 6.6% of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide, 2.5% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.3% of Disodium EDTA, 0.5% of Citric acid and 2.7% of Propylene glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition had an acceptable 30
12
viscosity. However, it produced too much foam and required a lot of water for the removal of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide and Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
Example 7:
A composition consisting of 87% of water, 6.6% of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide, 2.5% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.4% of Disodium EDTA, 0.5% of Citric acid and 3% of Propylene 5 glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition had an acceptable viscosity. However, it produced too much foam and required a lot of water for the removal of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide and Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
Example 8:
A composition consisting of 86.7% of water, 6.8% of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide, 2.5% of 10 Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.5% of Disodium EDTA, 0.5% of Citric acid and 3% of Propylene glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition had an acceptable viscosity. However, it produced too much foam and required a lot of water for the removal of Lauryldimethylamine Oxide and Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
Example 9: 15
A composition consisting of 86.7% of water, 6.8% of Sodium Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate, 2.5% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.5% of Disodium EDTA, 0.5% of Citric acid and 3% of Propylene glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition had an acceptable viscosity. However, it produced too much foam and required a lot of water for the removal of Sodium Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate and Cocamidopropyl Betaine. 20
Example 10:
A composition consisting of 85.5% of water, 7% of Sodium Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate, 3% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.5% of Disodium EDTA, 0.5% of Sodium chloride, 0.5% of Citric acid and 3% of Propylene glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition produced too much foam, was too viscous and required a lot of water to remove Sodium Dioctyl 25 Sulfosuccinate and Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
Example 11:
A composition consisting of 84.5% of water, 7.5% of Sodium Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate, 3% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, 0.5% of Disodium EDTA, 1% of Sodium chloride, 0.5% of Citric acid and 3% of Propylene glycol was found to be unsatisfactory. The composition was 30 extremely harsh on the skin, produced too much foam and required a lot of water to remove Sodium Dioctyl Sulfosuccinate and Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
It will be apparent to a person skilled in the art that the above description is for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as limiting. Various modifications, additions, alterations and improvements without deviating from the spirit and the scope of the 35 disclosure may be made by a person skilled in the art. Such modifications, additions,
13
alterations and improvements should be construed as being within the scope of this disclosure.

We Claim:
1. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition, consisting of:
water as a solvent;
a primary surfactant selected from the group consisting of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate, Alkyl Benzene Sulfonates, Lauric acid salts, Stearic acid, Alkyl Ether 5 Sulfates, Coconut Amine Oxide, Dodecyl Dimethyl Amine Oxide and N-alkyl Amino acids;
a secondary surfactant selected from the group consisting of Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Coco Betaine, Lauryl Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Coco Hydroxypropyl Sultaine, Disodium Cocoamphodiacetate, Cocamide MEA and Decyl Glucoside; 10
an emollient selected from the group consisting of Glycerine and Lactic acid;
a first preservative selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone; 15
a second preservative selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone;
a third preservative selected from the group consisting of Methyl Paraben, Propyl 20 Paraben, Diazolidinyl Urea, Ethylparaben, Butylparaben, Benzylparaben, Isopropylparaben, Isobutylparaben, DMDM- Hydantoin and Phenoxyethanol Isothiazolinone;
a moisturizer selected from the group consisting of Propylene glycol, Glycerine, plant oils and Panthenol; 25
a modifier selected from the group consisting of Citric acid and Sodium hydroxide; and
a fragrance,
wherein the composition consists of:
85% to 95% of purified water as a solvent, 5.2% to 7.8% of the primary surfactant, 30 0.4% to 1.8% of the secondary surfactant, 1.1% to 3.1% of the emollient, 0.065% to 0.08% of the first preservative, 0.065% to 0.08% of the second preservative, 0.065% to 0.08% of the third preservative 0.5% to 1.8% of the moisturizer, 0.025% to 0.08% of the modifier and 1% of the fragrance.
35
2. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the primary surfactant is Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate.
3. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the secondary surfactant is Cocamidopropyl Betaine. 40
4. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the emollient is Glycerine
15
5. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the first preservative is Methyl Paraben.
6. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the 5 second preservative is Propyl Paraben.
7. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the third preservative is Diazolidinyl Urea.
10
8. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the moisturizer is Propylene Glycol.
9. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the modifier is Citric acid. 15
10. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, wherein the fragrance is produced by compounds that are derived from natural sources.
11. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, said 20 composition consisting of 89.04% of purified water.
12. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 2, said composition consisting of 6.28% of Triethanolamine Lauryl Sulfate.
25
13. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 3, said composition consisting of 1% of Cocamidopropyl Betaine.
14. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 4, said composition consisting of 1.42% of Glycerine. 30
15. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 5, said composition consisting of 0.07% of Methyl Paraben.
16. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 6, said 35 composition consisting of 0.07% of Propyl Paraben.
17. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 7, said composition consisting of 0.07% of Diazolidinyl Urea.
40
18. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 8, said composition consisting of 1% of Propylene Glycol.
16
19. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 9, said composition consisting of 0.05% of Citric acid.
20. An alcohol-free waterless body bath composition according to claim 1, said composition consisting of 1% of the fragrance.