Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Analgesic, Anti Inflammatory And Anti Arthritic Activities Of Different Extracts Of Mucuna Gigantean Aerial Part Of Plant.

Abstract: The present invention provides a novel herbal composition for treatment of arthritic and analgesic and inflammatory comprises of extracts of arial part of plant and petroleum ether, ethanol and water to form powdered drug ready for suspension. Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens are all members of the same genus which can be used for the prevention and treatment of arthritic diseases and methods of using the above extracts and composition as potent analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic agents.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
07 March 2022
Publication Number
20/2023
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
BIOTECHNOLOGY
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR
MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), MULLANA, AMBALA, HARYANA 133207

Inventors

1. SUMEET GUPTA
M M COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), MULLANA, AMBALA, HARYANA 133207
2. SATISH KUMAR
M M COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY), MULLANA, AMBALA, HARYANA 133207 ARAGEN LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO. 28 A, IDA NACHARAM, HYDERABAD – 500076, INDIA
3. PRATIMA SRIVASTAVA
ARAGEN LIFE SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO. 28 A, IDA NACHARAM, HYDERABAD – 500076, INDIA

Specification

The present invention relates to herbal composition of analgesic, anti-inflammatory and an anti-arthritic and preparation process thereof.
Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to pharmaceutical composition comprising a herbal extract from a herb, Mucuna gigantean, based on the known functions of herb for the prevention and treatment of an arthritic diseases and methods of using such extracts and compositions as potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents.
Several patents have been issued for topical medicaments to relieve the pain and inflammation caused by arthritis and other similar diseases. For example, CN101282737A teaches a herbal pharmaceutical formulation comprising by the Korea's Chinese angelica root extract that uses ethanol, distilled water or the preparation of its mixture extraction, herb aArtemisiae Scopariae extract for regenerating cartilaginous tissue and treating osteoarthritis.
Another patent, U.S. Pat. No. 6,350,476 granted to Hou, teaches a formulation comprising ingredients from the plant species of the genera Stephania, Coix, Pinellia, Prunus, Phellodendron, Sophora, Tetrapanax, Stemona, Glycyrrhiza, Tripterygium, Forsythia, and Siegesbeckia.
Other inventions for similar application use many herbal ingredients or plants. Patent WO2003059370A1 uses a pharmaceutical composition essentially comprising a complex herbal extract of Chaenomelis Fructus, Achyranthis Radix, Acanthopanax, Phlomidis Radix, Gentianae Radix, Clematidis Radix and a pharmaceutical^ acceptable carrier thereof as an active ingredient for treating and preventing arthritic diseases.

Another invention, U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,176 (Tomer) teaches an edible formulation comprising Tanacetum parthenium, Zingibar officinale, Curcuma longa, Coriander sativum, Centella asiatica, Oenothera biennis, Valeriana officinalis, Tabebuia impetiginosa, Thymus vulgaris and Sambucus nigra.
While such externally-applied medicaments may have some effects on the treatment of arthritis, the effects are only seen insofar as the ability of the medicament to penetrate the superficial tissue into the muscles and joints when applied externally. It is therefore an object of the present invention to further improve an herbal medicament for arthritis and anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities. There is a revival of interest with herbal-based medicine due to the increasing realization of the health hazards associated with the indiscriminate use of modern medicine. The demand for plant-based medicines, health products, pharmaceuticals, food supplement, cosmetics etc are increasing in both developing and developed countries, due to the growing recognition that the natural products are non-toxic, have less side effects and easily available at affordable prices.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide a formulation and composition for herbal extract medication.
Another object of the present invention is to provide herbal drug of Mucuna gigantean for the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity.
Another object of the present invention is to provide herbal extracts of Mucuna gigantean as the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic disease.
Another object of the present invention is to provide herbal extracts of the arial part ofMucuna gigantean.
Another object of the present invention is to provide herbal extracts of Mucuna nigricans,

Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens. Mucuna prurien contains wide range of phyto-constituents like alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins and phenolic compounds which are responsible for different pharmacological activities.
Another object of the present invention is to provide herbal extracts of arial part of Mucuna gigantea seed extract contains L-DOPA which works as therapeutic agent in Parkinson's disease
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed description.
Summary of Invention
This summary is not a comprehensive overview of the disclosure and does not reflect the main/essential features of the establishment or specify the scope of the establishment. Its sole purpose is to present some of the concepts presented here in a simpler way as a precursor to more detailed explanations presented later.
The present invention relates to be used for the herbal composition of analgesic, anti-Inflammatory and an anti-arthritic. More specifically, said composition has anti-inflammatory activity, anti-arthritic and analgesic activities, and therefore can be used as the medicine of treatment arthritis.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the formulation comprises extracts of Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens. Mucuna prurien all members of the same genus. Specifically, the formulation comprises extracts of Mucuna gigantea.
In a first preferred embodiment of this aspect of the present invention, the very first step is collecting and washing the arial part of Mucuna gigantea with water and air drying and making

the power of this. The powdered drug was defatted with petroleum ether, ethanol and then extracted with water in Soxhlet apparatus.
The extraction step comprises refluxing arial part of the Mucuna gigantea with petroleum ether to produce an Extract 1; with ethanol to produce an Extract 2; with water to form an Extract 3 in Soxhlet apparatus. These extracts can then be used individually or in combination. In a preferred embodiment, a combined extract is formed by individually extracts.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the formulation dried under vacuum to result into solid form.
In the teachings of the present invention, any of these extraction methods can be followed by a purification process, preferably by passage through a thin layer chromatography for separation of compounds.
The present invention also provides, in another aspect, a method of treating arthritis inflammatory and analgesic activities in a mammal comprising orally administering a therapeutically effective amount of the composition given above or obtained by the method taught above.
The present invention also teaches a composition described herein for use in a medicament for the treatment of arthritis, inflammatory and analgesic in a mammal. Thus, the present invention also relates in a further aspect to a medicament or health supplement that can be applied to the body to exert its effects in deeper tissues in the treatment of arthritis and inflammatory conditions.
These and other aspects of the embodiments herein will be better appreciated and understood when considered in concurrence with the following explanation and the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the following descriptions, while indicating

preferred embodiments and numerous specific details thereof, are given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many changes and modifications may be made within the scope of the embodiments herein without departing from the spirit thereof, and the embodiments herein include all such modifications.
Detailed Description of the invention
These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice
the embodiments and all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as
commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
The various embodiments of the present invention provide the herbal composition of analgesic,
anti-Inflammatory and an anti-arthritic.
In some embodiments of the invention, a formulation comprising the one plant extract is
prepared.
Plant extract is obtained from the herb Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna monosperma andMucuna
pruriens. Mucuna prurien all members of the same genus.
A formulation comprising the extracts of plant materials Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna
monosperma and Mucuna pruriens. Mucuna prurien s thereof as an active ingredient effective
for analgesic, antiarthritis and antiinfiammation.
The pharmaceutical composition further comprise the extract of herb selected from the group
consisting of Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens. Mucuna prurien
thereof as an active ingredient for preventing and treating arthritic diseases.
The formulation wherein, Mucuna gigantean is selected from the group consisting of Mucuna
nigricans, Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens.
The formulation is in a form suitable for oral administration.
The formulation is selected from the group consisting of powder, capsule, tablet, liquid and
caplet.

A formulation effective for analgesic, antiarthritis and antiinflammation comprising therapeutically effective amounts of extract of herb and petroleum ether or ethanolic or water in the following range by weight: Mucuna gigantean - petroleum ether, 75-300 mg/kg, Mucuna gigantean - ethanol, 75-300 mg/kg and Mucuna gigantean - water, 75-300 mg/kg. A method for preparing the formulation of claim 1, comprising:
a. collecting the arial part of Mucuna gigantean and washing with water;
b. drying arial part of plant materials obtained from step a and making powder;
c. defatting the powdered drug obtained from step b with more than once with suitable
liquids to obtain extracts in Soxhlet apparatus;
d. drying extract under vacuum to result into solid form;
e. subjecting the extract to thin layer chromatography for separation of compounds; and
f conducting the study to determine the effects of the extracts paw edema, WBC's level
in blood serum and histopathological changes paw joints.
The method, wherein the Mucuna gigantean extracting step further comprises extracting the
Mucuna gigantean residue with a petroleum ether to produce another extract.
The method, wherein the Mucuna gigantean extracting step further comprises extracting the
Mucuna gigantean residue with an alcohol to produce another extract.
The method, wherein the Mucuna gigantean extracting step further comprises extracting the
Mucuna gigantean residue with water to produce another extract.
The formulation, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate the analgesic activity and
significant effect found at 180 min with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
The formulation, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate the anti- inflammatory effect
2-6 hours with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate the anti- arthritic
effect within day 14 -21 with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.

Examples 1
Extraction Methods
Generalized Extraction Method
The generalized extraction process comprises reducing the size of the herbal materials (for
example by pulverizing) followed by extraction by refluxing with a suitable solvent.
The extracts are then dried under vacuum. The components of the present invention were
subjected to various combinations of extraction methods by petroleum ether, ethanol and water
in order to determine the optimal process with the highest desired pharmacological effects.
At any point in the process, the intermediate products of any step may be subjected to
concentration, clarification or purification steps. Thereafter, some of the extracts were further
purified and tested for improved efficacy.
The Mucuna gigantean were collected, washed with water, air dried and then pulverized to a
coarse powder, further defatted with petroleum ether, ethanol and then extracted with water in
Soxhlet apparatus. The extract was dried under vacuum to result into solid form.
An extract of the formulation obtained from the process described above may be further
purified. One way of increasing the purity of the desired is to subject the extract to one or more
separation techniques in which the unwanted components are reduced, thus increasing the
relative abundance of the desired components in the extract.
A preferred separation technique is thin layer chromatography for separation of compounds
and to get the desired components but not the unwanted components under certain conditions.
Examples 2
A first implementation example of the invention to obtain the extract followed by an example
of a purification process to illustrate how the invention may be practiced.
The following procedure is for the preparation of an extract in the proportion of the formulation of the first implementation. The dried herb was separately pulverized into coarse powders.

The Mucuna gigantean was pulverized and defatted with petroleum ether. The petroleum ether extract was then filtered. The filtrate was then dried by vacuum to produce the Extract 1 in the range of 75 - 300 mg/kg (w/w).
The Mucuna gigantean was extracted and defatted with ethanol to produce Extract 2 in the range of 75 - 300 mg/kg (w/w). The filtrate was then dried by vacuum.
The Mucuna gigantean was defatted with water and then filtered. The filtrate was then dried by vacuum to produce the Extract 3 in the range of 75 - 300 mg/kg (w/w).
The analgesic effects of above extracts of the present invention were investigated in acute analgesic models induced by paw edema, WBC's level in blood serum and histopathological changes paw joints. The significant effect was observed at 180 min with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
The first study was conducted in Sprague dawley rats to evaluate the analgesic activity of Mucuna gigantean and we observed significant effect from 90 min to 120 min with water extract whereas it was less significant with alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
Table 1: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in analgesic activity on rats

Groups (n = 6) 0 min (s) After 30 min (s) After 60 min (s) After 90 min (s) After 120 min
(s) After 180 min (s)
Group 1 (Normal Control) 1.84 ±0.35 1.76 ± 0.42 1.87±0. 38 1.85± 0.38 1.93 ± 0.24 1.62 ± 0.42
Group 2 (Diclofenac) 1.69±0.18 1.84 ± 0.19
(4.74) 2.71± 0.52 c (45.05) 4.54±
0.37 a
(145.76) 5.84 ±0.44 a (203.29) 3.63 ± 0.42 a (124.97)
Group 3 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 1.76 ±0.23 1.83 ± 0.38 (3.89) 2.30 ±
0.33
(23.28) 2.67 ±
0.42
(44.31) 2.80 ±
0.48
(45.16) 2.47 ± 0.28 b (52.84)
Group 4 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 1.80±0.17 1.96 ±
0.47
(11.56) 2.28 ±
0.40
(22.03) 2.87 ±
0.48
(55.14) 3.74 ± 1.08 b (94.20) 2.43 ± 0.43 b (50.36)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 1.74 ±0.29 1.77 ± 0.26 (0.85) 1.96 ± 0.43 (5.08) 2.96 ±
0.48
(60.20) 2.96 ± 0.80
(53.72) 2.39 ± 0.35 c (47.99)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 1.70 ±0.26 1.77 ± 0.36 (0.85) 2.14±
0.77
(14.45) 2.87 ±
0.60
(55.14) 2.34 ±
0.30
(21.54) 2.18±
0.39
(34.78)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 1.72 ±0.19 1.86 ± 0.23 (5.59) 2.20 ±
0.53
(17.75) 2.88 ±
0.70
(56.14) 3.19 ± 1.05 °
(65.40) 2.08 ±
0.20
(28.59)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 1.71 ±0.32 1.79 ± 0.41 (1.99) 2.63 ±
0.69
(40.95) 3.14± 0.55 c (70.04) 3.27 ±
0.79
(69.64) 2.42 ± 0.52 c (49.54)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 1.70 ±0.28 1.66 ± 0.42 (-5.59) 2.18±
0.59
(16.86) 2.90 ±
0.57
(56.77) 2.76 ±
0.46
(43.34) 2.42 ± 0.14 c (49.54)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 1.71 ±0.19 1.88 ± 0.31 (6.73) 2.52 ±
0.56
(34.61) 3.28 ± 0.43 c (77.35) 3.22 ±
0.43
(67.04) 2.41 ± 0.25 c (48.92)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 1.67 ±0.32 1.92 ± 0.42 (9.10) 2.35 ±
0.32
(25.69) 3.64 ± 1.46 a (96.93) 3.80 ± 1.00 b (96.97) 2.14±
0.30
(32.71)
F Value 0.3214 1.497 6.075 12.42 11.26
P Value 0.9721 0.1655 O.0001 O.0001 O.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), a.P<0.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
The anti-inflammatory effects of above extracts of the present invention were investigated in Sprague dawley rats to determine acute anti- inflammatory activity of Mucuna gigantean extracts, and it was observed that water, alcoholic and petroleum ether extract has highly

significant anti- inflammatory effect 2 hour to 6 hours at higher dose and some effect at lower doses also.

Table 2: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in plethysmometer) activity on rats

Acute Inflammation (Using


Groups (n = 6)

Pre-
Induction
hour

1st hour

2nd hour

3rd hour

4th hour

6th hour


Group 1 (Normal Control)

0.690 ± 0.023 (-2.73)

0.695 ±0.019 (1.65)

0.672 ± 0.015 a (23.24)

0.667 ± 0.022" (26.74)

0.663 ± 0.023 a (29.18)

0.663 ± 0.019" (23.90)


Group 2 (Inflammation Control)

0.672 ±0.028

0.707 ±0.022

0.875 ±0.019

0.910 ±0.011

0.937 ±0.022

0.872 ±0.028


Group 3 (Diclofenac)

0.682 ±0.023 (-1.49)

0.705 ±0.018 (0.24)

0.723 ± 0.016 a (17.33)

0.752 ± 0.038 ' (17.40)

0.735 ± 0.019 a (21.53)

0.702 ± 0.017" (19.50)


Group 4 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg)

0.675 ± 0.024 (-0.24)

0.708 ± 0.015 (-0.24)

0.873 ±0.015 (0.19)

0.873 ±0.020 c(4.03)

0.870 ±0.022 a(7.12)

0.813 ±0.026 b(6.69)


Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg)

0.683 ±0.018 (-1.89)

0.720 ± 0.024 (-1.89)

0.853 ±0.022 (2.48)

0.860 ±0.013 c(5.49)

0.858 ±0.023 a(8.36)

0.822 ±0.019 c(5.74)


Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg)

0.672 ± 0.021 (-0.24)

0.708 ± 0.017 (-0.24)

0.812 ± 0.030 a (7.24)

0.802 ±0.019 a (11.90)

0.800 ±0.013 a (14.59)

0.787 ±0.024 a(9.75)


Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg)

0.683 ±0.016 (-1.42)

0.717 ± 0.018 (-1.42)

0.900 ±0.018 (-2.86)

0.915 ±0.022 (-0.55)

0.905 ±0.014 (3.38)

0.818 ±0.025 c(6.12)


Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg)

0.682 ±0.018 (-2.12)

0.722 ± 0.012 (-2.12)

0.858 ±0.012 (1.90)

0.863 ±0.010 c(5.13)

0.878 ±0.019 a(6.23)

0.818 ±0.028 c(6.12)


Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg)

0.677 ± 0.024 (-1.18)

0.715 ± 0.021 (-1.18)

0.780 ± 0.024 a (10.86)

0.802 ±0.025 a (11.90)

0.807 ±0.014 a(13.88)

0.798 ±0.026 a(8.41)


Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg)

0.673 ±0.014 (-0.94)

0.713 ± 0.010 (-0.94)

0.812 ± 0.029 a (7.24)

0.880 ±0.026 (3.30)

0.880 ±0.029 a(6.05)

0.815 ±0.022 c(6.50)


Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg)

0.680 ±0.017 (-1.65)

0.718 ± 0.020 (-1.65)

0.802 ± 0.025 a (8.38)

0.807 ±0.016 a(11.36)

0.843 ±0.020 a(9.96)

0.808 ±0.023 b (7.27)


Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg)

0.680 ±0.015 (-1.18)

0.715 ± 0.021 (-1.1?

0.752 ± 0.013 a (14.10)

0.793 ±0.012 a (12.82)

0.778 ±0.017 a (16.90)

0.765 ±0.031 a (12.24)


F Value

0.4238

1.018

65.57

69.60

;.56

32.58


P Value

0.9396

0.4423

O.0001

O.0001

O.0001

O.0001


Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA fo test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.

lowed by Dunnett's multiple range ^<0.000L TO.OOL ci><0.05

The anti-arthritic activity of Asparagus officinalis evaluated and it was observed statistically significant effect on body weight with aqueous and alcoholic extracts

Table 3: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts on body weights of Arthritic animals

Groups (n = 6) Dayl Day 7 Day 15 Day 21
Group 1 (Normal Control) 128.96± 10.72 (-0.030) 179.67±
10.99 (-
5.46) 244.19± 13.66
(4.25) 299.30± 12.00 (9.74)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 128.99± 10.20 190.05± 13.41 234.24± 13.40 272.74± 8.44
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 129.10±9.75 (0.08) 181.75±
12.26 (-
4.37) 236.55± 15.15 (0.98) 294.53± 12.33 (7.99)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 129.43± 9.06 (0.34) 182.93± 9.67 (-
3.75) 236.80± 10.34 (1.09) 286.80± 12.49 (5.16)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 129.36± 9.07 (0.28) 180.61± 8.31 (-4.97) 226.90±
11.64 (-
3.13) 280.79± 16.23 (2.95)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 129.34± 8.80 (0.27) 183.39± 9.79 (-3.50) 234.85± 14.47 (0.26) 288.17± 18.89 (5.66)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 129.12±8.66 (0.10) 186.94±
7.23 (-
1.63) 236.80± 14.64 (1.09) 279.65± 15.03 (2.54)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 129.47± 8.51 (0.37) 181.26± 11.50 (-
4.62) 237.60± 14.46 (1.43) 281.61± 12.07 (3.25)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 129.53±8.23 (0.42) 182.34± 7.38 (-4.05) 231.83±
8.96 (-
1.03) 287.32± 16.55 (5.35)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 129.80±7.99 (0.63) 178.08± 5.59 (-6.30) 231.45± 1.28(1.19) 284.45± 11.32 (4.30)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 129.63±7.99 (0.50) 181.40± 8.99 (-4.55) 228.91±
12.06 (-
2.28) 278.39± 7.33 (2.07)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 129.60±7.99 (0.47) 176.50±
13.04 (-
7.13) 226.16±
14.80 (-
3.45) 280.51± 14.88 (2.85)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 129.77± 7.62 (0.60) 182.43 ± 5.61 (-4.01) 236.72 ± 7.04(1.06) 284.07 ± 18.14 (4.16)
F Value 0.006032 0.8006 0.9776 1.505
P Value >0.9999 0.6483 0.4792 0.1453
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), TO.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05
compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.

It was observed that water, alcoholic and petroleum ether extract has significant anti- arthritic effect. Effect starts with day 14 and final observation was taken on day 21. Anti- arthritic activity was evaluated using water displacement method with plethysmometer at different days.
Table 4: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in Arthritis (Using plethysmometer) activity on rats

Groups (n = 6) 1st Day 7" Day 14th Day 21s'Day
Group 1 (Normal Control) 0.74 ± 0.02 0.94 ± 0.02 a (49.09) 1.26 ± 0.06 a (48.11) 1.50 ± 0.09 a (40.41)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 0.75 ± 0.03 1.84 ±0.03 2.42 ±0.33 2.51 ±0.26
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 0.74 ± 0.05 1.84 ±0.05 (0.09) 1.92 ± 0.17 a (20.65) 1.80 ±0.16 a
(28.33)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 0.73 ± 0.01 1.82±0.10 (0.73) 1.77±0.12a (26.77) 1.70 ±0.15 a
(32.18)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 0.73 ± 0.03 1.78 ±0.07 (3.09) 2.03 ± 0.18 b (16.24) 1.87 ± 0.22 a (25.75)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 0.75 ± 0.01 1.76 ±0.05 (4.26) 1.91 ±0.12 a
(21.34) 1.93 ±0.16 a
(23.22)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 0.74 ± 0.03 1.79 ±0.06 (2.36) 1.88±0.13a (22.30) 1.84 ±0.11 a
(26.94)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 0.76 ± 0.06 1.83 ±0.03 (0.64) 2.05 ± 0.23 b (15.28) 2.01 ± 0.28 a (20.04)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 0.74 ± 0.03 1.81 ±0.06 (1.45) 1.86±0.10a (23.19) 1.84 ±0.12 a (26.68)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 0.73 ± 0.02 1.83 ±0.03 (0.54) 1.78 ± 0.09 a (26.43) 1.81 ±0.09 a
(28.14)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 0.75 ± 0.02 1.81 ±0.06 (1.27) 2.09 ± 0.17 c (13.83) 2.07±0.15a (17.65)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 0.75 ± 0.01 1.82 ±0.03 (0.82) 1.88 ± 0.07 a (22.51) 1.83 ± 0.04 a (27.01)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 0.74 ± 0.03 1.79 ±0.05 (2.54) 1.74 ± 0.04 a (28.29) 1.73 ± 0.04 a (31.19)
F Value 0.5403 121.03 16.24 13.00
P Value 0.8802 O.0001 O.0001 O.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range
test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), TO.0001, hP<0.00l,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
It was observed that water, alcoholic and petroleum ether extract has significant anti- arthritic effect. Effect starts with day 10 and final observation was taken on day 21. Anti- arthritic activity was evaluated by taking paw diameter with Vernier caliper.

Table 5: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in Arthritis (Using Vernier calliper) activity on rats

Groups (n = 6) 1st Day (mm) 7hDay (mm) Iff" Day (mm) 15th Day (mm) 2ffhDay (mm)
Group 1 (Normal Control) 4.33 ±0.23 4.45 ±0.26 a (43.32) 5.15 ±
0.40 a (48.27) 5.37 ± 0.21 a (46.14) 5.54 ± 0.13 a
(43.82)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 4.29 ±0.12 7.84 ±0.87 9.95 ± 0.59 9.98 ± 0.27 9.86 ± 0.40
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 4.31 ±0.28 7.48 ± 0.44 (4.65) 8.14 ± 0.82 a (18.14) 7.22 ± 0.45 a (27.68) 6.83 ± 0.21 a (30.78)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 4.40 ±0.26 7.55 ±0.40 (3.76) 7.90 ± 0.24 a (20.58) 6.84 ± 0.41 a (31.44) 6.61 ± 0.50 a (32.97)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 4.26 ±0.11 7.64 ±0.33 (2.53) 8.33 ± 0.49 a (16.26) 7.61 ± 0.34 a (23.69) 7.15 ± 0.47 a (27.51)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 4.22 ±0.19 7.54 ±0.38 (3.87) 8.20 ± 0.31 a
(17.53) 7.58 ± 0.33 a (24.04) 6.96 ± 0.37 a (29.39)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 4.10 ±0.09 7.33 ±0.31 (6.55) 8.19 ± 0.61 a
(17.66) 7.47 ± 0.65 a (25.11) 6.41 ± 0.44 a (34.98)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 4.17±0.13 7.48 ±0.39 (4.59) 8.62 ± 0.50 b (13.32) 7.46 ± 0.44 a (25.21) 7.36 ± 0.62 a (25.42)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 4.39 ±0.34 7.46 ± 0.24 (4.85) 8.31 ± 0.240 a (16.47) 7.22 ± 0.51 a
(27.68) 6.98 ± 0.40 a (29.20)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 4.27 ±0.28 7.36 ±0.28 (6.14) 8.23 ± 0.47 a (17.23) 7.47 ± 0.26 a (25.09) 6.88 ± 0.56 a (30.25)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 4.36 ±0.24 7.38 ±0.40 (5.93) 9.05 ± 0.78 c (9.05) 7.86 ± 0.59 a (21.20) 7.63 ± 1.23 a
(22.61)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 4.22 ±0.19 7.18±0.13 c (8.42) 8.84 ± 0.64 b (11.11) 8.86 ± 0.91 °
(11.18) 7.37 ± 0.55 a (25.27)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 4.46 ±0.29 7.27 ±0.26 (7.27) 8.86 ± 0.49 b (10.93) 7.09 ± 0.30 a (28.98) 6.55 ± 0.50 a (33.58)
F Value 1.180 27.48 24.60 29.99 19.18
P Value 0.3162 O.0001 O.0001 O.0001 O.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range
test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), T<0.0001, hP<0.00l,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.

It was observed that water, alcoholic and petroleum ether extract has significant anti- arthritic activity. Visual scorings were given based on walking, inflammation, joint deformities and pain assessment using Grimace scale (0= Normal to 5= Severe).
Table 6: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in Arthritis (Using Arthritis Visual Score) activity on rats

Groups (n = 6) 1st
Day J* Day WDay If Day 20* Day
Group 1 (Normal Control) 0.00 0.00 ±0.00=" (100.00) 0.00 ±0.00=" (100.00) 0.00 ±0.00=" (100.00) 0.00 ±0.00 => (100.00)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 4.50 ±0.55 4.50 ±0.55 4.50 ±0.55
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 0.00 2.83 ±0.41 (-6.25) 4.33 ±0.52 (3.70) 2.67 ±0.52 (40.74) 2.17 ±0.76 ="(51.85)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 (0.00) 3.50 ± 0.55 c (22.22) 2.17±0.41a (51.85) 0.83 ±0.75 => (81.48)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 0.00 3.00 ±0.00 (-12.50) 4.67 ±0.52 (-3.70) 3.00 ±0.00=" (33.33) 2.67 ±0.52 a (40.74)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 (0.00) 4.33 ±0.52 (3.70) 2.50 ±0.55=" (44.44) 2.50 ±0.55 a (44.44)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 0.00 3.00 ±0.00 (-12.50) 4.17±0.41 (7.41) 2.33 ±0.52=' (48.15) 1.50 ±0.55 a (66.67)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 (0.00) 4.67 ±0.52 (-3.70) 2.67 ±0.52=" (40.74) 3.00 ±0.63 a (33.33)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 0.00 2.50 ±0.55 (6.25) 4.67 ±0.52 (-3.70) 2.33 ±0.52=' (48.15) 2.33 ±0.52 a (48.15)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 (0.00) 4.83 ±0.41 (-7.41) 2.17±0.41a (51.85) 1.83 ±0.75 a (59.26)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 0.00 2.83 ±0.41 (-6.25) 4.67 ±0.52 (-3.70) 3.33 ± 0.82 c (25.93) 3.67 ±1.03 c (18.52)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 0.00 2.67 ±0.52 (0.00) 4.67 ±0.52 (-3.70) 2.83 ±0.75=" (37.04) 3.00 ±0.63 a (33.33)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 0.00 3.00 ±0.000 (-12.50) 4.50 ±0.55 (0.00) 2.17±0.41a (51.85) 1.17±0.41 a (74.07)
F Value 21.15 40.94 22.27 21.97
P Value 0.0001 O.0001 O.0001 O.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), TO.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05
compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
On last day animals were sacrificed and Spleen was collected and spleen weight was recorded
we observed ethanolic extract is significantly able to retain the spleen weight in normal range

whereas some activity was also noticed with petroleum ether and alcoholic extracts also. Table 7: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts in Arthritis Animal Spleen Weight

Groups (n = 6) Spleen Weight (g)
Group 1 (Normal Control) 0.74 ± 0.08 c (19.67)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 0.91 ±0.08
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 0.75 ± 0.09 c (18.28)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 0.52 ± 0.08 a (43.38)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 0.71 ± 0.08 c (22.11)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 0.65 ± 0.10 b (28.98)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 0.69 ±0.10 c (24.06)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 0.73 ±0.14 c (20.36)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 0.69 ± 0.11 c (24.66)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 0.70 ± 0.07 c (23.04)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 0.81 ±0.09 (11.23)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 0.70 ± 0.07 c (23.04)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 0.64 ± 0.11 a (30.50)
F Value 5.520
P Value <0.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), TO.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
Rat serum was analyzed for RA Factor aqueous, ethanol and petroleum ether extracts were
observed with statistically significant anti- arthritic activity.
Table 8: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts on RA Factor in Arthritis.

Groups (n = 6) IU/mL
Group 1 (Normal Control) 7.60± 1.15 a(65.51)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 22.03 ±0.59
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 13.57 ±4.19 c (38.43)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 11.17±5.35b(49.32)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 15.77 ±3.94 (28.44)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 12.37 ± 6.09 c (43.87)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 14.23 ± 2.58 c (35.40)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 16.83 ±6.10 (23.60)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 13.00 ±2.44 c (41.00)

Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 11.27 ± 4.86 b (48.87)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 11.87±6.71b(46.14)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 7.17 ± 1.79 a (67.47)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 9.10 ± 1.97 a (58.70)
F Value 5.504
P Value <0.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), a.P<0.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
During arthritis it is noticed that WBC's increase. All the extracts were found very effective and statistically significant and helped in keeping the WBC's in range with normal group. Table 9: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts on WBC's in Arthritis.

Groups (n = 6) CeUs/cumm
Group 1 (Normal Control) 6066.67 ± 1795.36 a (58.06)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 14466.67 ±750.56
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 8200.00 ±2271.56° (43.32)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 5033.33 ± 702.38 a (65.21)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 6466.67 ± 503.32 a (55.30)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 8766.67 ±680.69° (39.40)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 7100.00 ± 5666.57 a (50.92)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 7966.67 ± 1855.62 b (44.93)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 7066.67 ±2307.23 a (51.15)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 7733.33 ± 2214.35 b (46.54)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 9700.00 ±3251.15° (32.95)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 8600.00 ±2338.80° (40.55)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 4766.67 ± 4201.59 a (67.05)
F Value 5.255
P Value <0.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), a.P<0.0001, hP<0.00\,c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
X-ray and histopathological changes in joint showed highly significant anti- arthritic activity.
Table 10: Effect of Mucuna gigantea extracts on Arthritic Joints in X-Ray.

Groups (n = 6) mm
Group 1 (Normal Control) 6.29 ± 0.35 a (38.43)
Group 2 (Arthritic Control) 10.21 ±0.64
Group 3 (Methotrexate) 8.32 ± 0.68 a (18.52)
Group 4 (Prednisolone) 8.29 ± 0.51 a (18.86)
Group 5 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 75 mg/kg) 8.85 ± 0.49 c (13.38)
Group 6 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 150 mg/kg) 9.68 ±0.49 (5.25)
Group 7 (Mucuna gigantea, Petroleum ether, 300 mg/kg) 8.64 ± 0.73 b (15.42)
Group 8 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 75 mg/kg) 9.37 ±0.57 (8.29)
Group 9 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 150 mg/kg) 9.15 ±0.64 c (10.41)
Group 10 (Mucuna gigantea, Ethanol, 300 mg/kg) 9.64 ±0.85 (5.65)
Group 11 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 75 mg/kg) 9.81 ±0.51 (3.92)
Group 12 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 150 mg/kg) 9.42 ±0.36 (7.75)
Group 13 (Mucuna gigantea, Water, 300 mg/kg) 8.57 ± 0.51 a (16.07)
F Value 17.73
P Value <0.0001
Statistical analysis of data was carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple range test. The values are expressed as mean ± SD for each group (n=6), TO.0001, hP<0.00\, c P<0.05 compared with negative control group, ns: non-significant.
The aqueous, ethanolic and petroleum ether extract were found to decrease RA factor, WBC's and Spleen weight and they are statistically significant. X-ray and histopathology were performed for joints and statistically significant efficacy was observed. Anti- inflammatory activity was performed using Paw edema model. Aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extract has statistically significant anti- inflammatory effect from 2 hours to 6 hours at higher dose and less effect at lower doses also.
The results show that ethanolic and aqueous extract showing good anti- arthritic compared to petroleum ether extract against CFA induced arthritis of Asparagus officinalis also the aqueous, ethanolic and petroleum ether extract of this plant shows good Anti- arthritic and anti¬inflammatory activities but less analgesic activity.

claim:

1. A formulation comprising the extracts of plant materials Mucuna gigantea,
Mucuna nigricans, Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens. Mucuna prurien
thereof as an active ingredient effective for analgesic, antiarthritis and
antiinflammation comprises therapeutically effective amounts of extract of herb and
petroleum ether or ethanolic or water in the following range by weight: Mucuna
gigantea - petroleum ether, 75-300 mg/kg, Mucuna gigantea - ethanol, 75-300 mg/kg
and Mucuna gigantea - water, 75-300 mg/kg;
wherein Mucuna gigantea is selected from the group consisting of Mucuna nigricans,
Mucuna monosperma and Mucuna pruriens;
wherein the formulation is in a form suitable for oral administration;
wherein the form is selected from the group consisting of powder, capsule, tablet,
liquid and caplet.
2. A method for preparing the formulation as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
a. collecting the arial part of Mucuna gigantea and washing with water;
b. drying arial part of plant materials obtained from step a and making powder;
c. defatting the powdered drug obtained from step b with more than once with suitable
liquids to obtain extracts in Soxhlet apparatus;
d. drying extract under vacuum to result into solid form;
e. subjecting the extract to thin layer chromatography for separation of compounds; and
f conducting the study to determine the effects of the extracts paw edema, WBC's level
in blood serum and histopathological changes paw joints.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the Mucuna gigantea extracting step further
comprises extracting the Mucuna gigantea residue with a petroleum ether to produce another extract.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the Mucuna gigantea extracting step further
comprises extracting the Mucuna gigantea residue with an alcohol to produce another extract.
5. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the Mucuna gigantea extracting step further
comprises extracting the Mucuna gigantea residue with water to produce another extract.
6. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate
the analgesic activity and significant effect found at 180 min with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
7. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate
the anti- inflammatory effect 2-6 hours with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.
8. The formulation as claimed in claim 1, wherein the formulation is conducted to evaluate
the anti- arthritic effect within day 14-21 with aqueous, alcoholic and petroleum ether extracts.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 202211012181-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
2 202211012181-FORM FOR SMALL ENTITY(FORM-28) [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
3 202211012181-FORM 1 [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
4 202211012181-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI(FORM-28) [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
5 202211012181-EVIDENCE FOR REGISTRATION UNDER SSI [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
6 202211012181-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
7 202211012181-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
8 202211012181-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [07-03-2022(online)].pdf 2022-03-07
9 202211012181-Retyped Pages under Rule 14(1) [12-05-2022(online)].pdf 2022-05-12
10 202211012181-2. Marked Copy under Rule 14(2) [12-05-2022(online)].pdf 2022-05-12
11 202211012181-FORM-26 [12-05-2023(online)].pdf 2023-05-12
12 202211012181-FORM-9 [15-05-2023(online)].pdf 2023-05-15