Abstract: An apparatus for generating a decorrelated signal comprising a transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910), a transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920), a second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930), a combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) and a mixer (450; 552; 752; 952), wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910 is adapted to separate an input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component such that the first signal component comprises transient signal portions of the input signal and such that the second signal component comprises nontransient signal portions of the input signal. The combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740;940) and the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) are arranged so that a decorrelated signal from a combination unit is fed into the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) as an input signal.
1. An apparatus for decoding a signal comprising: a transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) for separating an apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component such that the first signal component comprises transient signal portions of the input signal and such that the second signal component comprises non-transient signal portions of the input signal; a transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) for decorrelating the first signal component according to a first decorrelation method to obtain a first decorrelated signal component; a further second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) for decorrelating the second signal component according to a second decorrelation method to obtain a second decorrelated signal component, wherein the second decorrelation method is different from the first decorrelation method; a combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) for combining the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component to obtain a decorrelated combination signal; and a mixer (450; 552; 752; 952), being adapted to receive mixer input signals and being adapted to generate output signals based on the mixer input signals and a mixing matrix; wherein the combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) and the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) are arranged so that the decorrelated combination signal is fed into the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) as a first mixer input signal.
2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to receive correlation/coherence parameter data indicating a correlation or coherence between two signals and wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to generate the output signals based on the correlation/coherence parameter data.
3. An apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to receive level difference parameter data indicating an energy difference between two signals and wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to generate the output signals based on the level difference parameter data.
4. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is adapted to employ a mixing matrix which comprises the rule to multiply the first and second mixer input signal by a mixing matrix.
5. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) is adapted to combine the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component by adding the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component.
6. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to either feed a considered signal portion of the apparatus input signal into the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) or to feed the considered signal portion into the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) depending on transient separation information which either indicates that the considered signal portion comprises a transient or which indicates that the considered signal portion does not comprise a transient.
7. An apparatus according to one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to partially feed a considered signal portion of the apparatus input signal into the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) and to partially feed the considered signal portion into the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930), and wherein the amount of the considered signal portion that is fed into the transient separator and the amount of the considered signal portion that is fed into the second decorrelator depend on transient separation information.
8. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate an apparatus input signal which is represented in a frequency domain.
9. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate the apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component based on a frequency independent transient separation information.
10. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate the apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component based on a frequency dependent transient separation information.
11. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the apparatus furthermore comprises a receiving unit (650) which is adapted to receive the phase information from an encoder; and wherein the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) is adapted to apply the phase information from the encoder to the first signal component.
12. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) is a lattice IIR decorrelator.
13. A method for decoding a signal comprising: separating an apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component such that the first signal component comprises transient signal portions of the apparatus input signal and such that the second signal component comprises non-transient signal portions of the apparatus input signal; decorrelating the first signal component by a transient decorrelator according to a first decorrelation method to obtain a first decorrelated signal component; decorrelating the second signal component by a further second decorrelator according to a second decorrelation method to obtain a second decorrelated signal component, wherein the second decorrelation method is different from the first decorrelation method; combining the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component to obtain a decorrelated combination signal; and generating output signals based on a mixing matrix and the decorrelated combination signal.
14. A computer program implementing a method according to claim 13.
5 is advantagcous that there is no need to spend additional transmission costs for the phase data if GES data is needed for the application of the GES feature anyway. Bitstream backward compatibility is achieved with MPS bitstreams/decoders. However, phase information extractcd from GES data is not as exact (e.g.: the sign of the estimated phase is unknown) as the phase information that might be obtained in the encoder. 30 In a further embodiment, phase information may also be obtained in a decoder, but from transmittcd non-fullband residuals. This is applicable, e.g., if band limited residual signals arc transmttted (typically covering a frequency range up to a certain transition frequency) in an MPS coding scheme. In such an embodimen,, the phase relation between the $5 downmix and transmttted residual signal in the residual band(s) is calculated, i.e., for frcqucncies for which residual signals are transmitted. Furthermore, the phase information from the residual band(s) to the non-residual band(s) is extrapolated (and/or possibly interpolated.. One possibiltty is to map the phase relation obtained in the residual band(s) to a global frequency independent phase relation value that is then used for the transient dccollator. This results in the benefit that no additional transmission costs arise for the phase data, jf non-full band residuals are transmitted anyway. However, it has to be considered, that the correctness of the phase estimate depends on the width of the frcqucney band(s) where residual signals are transmitted. The correctness of the phase estimates also depends on the consistency of the phase relation between the downmix and the residual signal along the frequency axis. For clearly transient signals, high consistency is usually encountered. In a further embodimen,, phase information is obtained in a decoder employing additional correction information transmitted from the encoder. Such an embodiment is similar to the two previous embodimenss (phase from GES, phase from residuals), but additionally, it is necessary to generate correction data in the encoder which is transmitted to the decoder. The correction data allows for reducing the phase estimation error that may occur in the two variants described before (phase from GES, phase from residuals). Furthermore, the correction data may be derived from estimating the decoder-side phase estimation error in the encoder. The correction data may be this (potentially coded) estimated estimation error. Furthermore, with respect to the phase-estimaiion-from-GES-data approach, the correction data may simply he the correct sign of the encoder-generated phase values. This allows generating phase terms with the correct sign in the decoder. The benefit of such an approach is that due to the correction data, the exactness of the phase information recoverable in the decoder is much closer to that of the encoder generated phase information. However, the entropy of the correction information is lower than the entropy of the correct phase information itself. Thus, the parameter bit rate is lowered when compared to directly transmitiing the phase information obtained in the encoder. In another emhodimen,, phase information/terms are obtained from a (pseudo-) random process in a decoder. The benefit of such an approach is that there is no need to transmit any phase information with high temporal rcsolution. This results in a reduced data rate. In an embodimen,, a simple mcthod is to generate phase values with a uniform random distribution in thc range 1-180°, 180°]. In a further emhodiment, the statistical properties of the phase distribution in the encoder arc measured. Thcse properties are coded and then transmitted (at low time resolution) to the decoder. Random phase values are generated in the decoder which are subject to the transmitted statistical properties. These properties might be the mean, variants, or other statistical measures of the statistical phase distribution. When more than one decorrelator instance is running in paralell (e.g,, for a muliichnnnel upmix), care has to be taken to ensure mutually decorrelated decorrelator outputs. In an cmbodiment, wherein multiple vectoss of (pseudo)) random phase values (instead of a single vecto)) arc generated for all but the first decorrelator instance, a set of vectoss is selected that results in the least correlation of the phase value across all decorrelator instances. In case of transmttting phase correction information from the encoder to the decode,, the requrred data rate can be reduced as follow:: The phase correction information only needs to be availabee in the decodrr as long as there arc transient components in the signal to be decorrelated. The transmission of the phase correctinn information can thus be limited by the encoder such that only the necessary information is transmttted to the decode.. This can be done by applying a transient detectinn in the encodrr as has been described above. Phase correction information is only transmitted for poinss in time n, for which transienss have been detected in the encode.. Returnngg to the aspect of transient separation, in an embodiment, transeent separation may be dccodrr driven. In sueh an embodiment, transient separation information may also be obtained in the decode,, e.g,, by applying a transient detection method as described in Andress Walthe,, Christinn Uhle, Sascha Disch "Using Transient Suppression in Blind Multi-chnnnel Up¬mix Algorithms." in Proc. 122nd AES Convention, Vienn,, Austria, May 2007 to the downmxx signal that is availabee in the spatial audio decoder before upmixing to a stereo or multichnnnel output signa.. In this case, no transient information has to be transmitted, which saves transmission data rate. However, performing the transient detection in decoding might cause issues when, e.g., standardizing the transeent handling schem:: for example, it might be hard to find a transient detectinn algorithm which results in exactly the same transeent detectinn results when being implemented on different architectures/platforms involving different numerical precisions, roundngg schemes, etc. Such a predictable decodrr behavorr is often mandatory for standardizati.n. Furthermo,e, the standardized transient detectinn algortthm might fail for some input signals, causing intolerable distortions in the output signas.. It might then be difticutt to correct the failing algortthm after standardization without building a decodrr that is not conforming to the standard. This issue might be less severe if at least a parameter controlling the transient separation strength is transmitted at low time resolution (e.g., at the spatial parameter update rate of MPS) from the encoder to the decoder. In a further embodimen,, transient separation is also decoder driven and non-fullband residuals are transmttted. In this embodimen,, the decoder driven transient separation may be refined by employing obtained phase estimates from transmitted non-fullband residuals (see above). Note that this refinement can be applied in the decoder without transmitting additional data from the encoder to the decoder. In this embodimen,, the phase terms that are applied in a transient decorrelator are obtained by extrapolaiing the correct phase values from the residual bands to frequencies where no residuals are available. One method is to calculate a (potentially e.g. signal power weighted) mean phase value from the phase values that can be calculated for those frequencies where residual signals are available. The mean phase value may then be applied as a frequency independent parameter in the transient decorrelator. As long as the correct phase relation between the downmix and the residual is frequency independen,, the mean phase value represents a good estimate of the correct phase value. However; in the case of a phase relation that is not consistent along the frequency axis, the mean phase value may be a less correct estimate, potentially leading to incorrect phase values and audible artifacts. The consistency of the phase relation between the downmix and the transmitted residual along the frequency axis can therefore be used as a reliability measure of the extrapolated phase estimate that is applied in the transient decorrelator. To lower the risk of audible artifacts, the consistency measure obtained in the decoder may be used to control the transient separation strength in the decoder, e.g. as follows: Transients, for which the corresponding phase information (i.e. the phase information for the same time index n) is consistent along frequency, are fully separated from the conventional decorrelator input and are fully fed into the transient decorrelator. Since large phase estimation errors are unlikely, the full potential of the transient handling is used. Transients, for which the corresponding phase information is less consistent along frequency, arc only partially separated, leading to a less prominent effect of the transient handling scheme. Transients, for which the corresponding phase information is very inconsistent along frequency, are not separated, leading to the standard behavior of a conventional upmix system without the proposed transient handling. Thus, no artifacts due to large phase estimation errors can occur. The consistency measures for the phase information may be deducted, e.g. from the (potentially signal power weighted) variance of standard deviation of the phase information along frequency. Since only few frequencies may be available for which the residual signals are transmitted, the consistency measure may have to be estimated from only few samples along frequency, leading to a consistency measure that only seldom reaches extreme values ("perfectly consistent" or "perfectly inconsistent"). Thus, the consistency measure may be linearly or non-linearly distorted before being used to control the transient separation strength. In an embodimen,, a threshold characteristic is implemented as illustrated in Fig. 8, right example. Fig. 8 depicts different exemplary mappings from phase consistency measures to transient separation strengths, illustrating the impact of the variants for obtaining transient handling parameters on the robustness to transient .reclassificaiion. The variants for obtaining the transient separation information and the phase information listed above differ in parameter data rate and therefore represent different operating points in term of overall bit rate of a eodee implemeniing the proposed transient handling technique. Apart from this, the choice of the source for obtaining the phase information also affects aspects such as the robustness to false transient classificaiion:: handling a non-transient signal as a transient causes much less audible distortions if the correct phase information is applied in the transient handling. Thus, a signal classificaiion error causes less severe artifacts in the scenario of transmitted phase values when compared to the scenario of random phase generation in the decoder. Fig. 9 is a One-To-Two system overview with transient handling according to a further embodimen,, wherein narrow band residual signals are transmitted. The phase data Acp is estimated from the phase relation between the downmix (DMX) and the residual signal in the frequcncy band(s) of the residual signal. Optionally, phase correction data is transmitted to lower the phase estimation error. Fig. 9 illustrates a transient separator 910, a transient decorrelator 920, a lattice IIR deeollator 930, a combining unit 940, a mixer 952 an optional shaping unit 954, a first adding unit 956 and a second adding unit 958, which correspond to the transient separator 510, the transient decollator 520, the lattice IIR decorrelator 530, the combining unit 540, the mixer 552 thc optional shaping unit 554, the first adding unit 556 and the second adding unit 558 of the embodiment of Fig. 5, respectively. The embodiment of Fig. 8 furthermore comprises a phase estimation unit 960. The phase estimation unit 960 receives an input signal DMX, a residual signal "residual" and optionally, phase correction data. Based on the received information the phase information unit calculates phase data Acp. Optionally, the phase estimation unit also determines phase consistency information and passes the phase consistency information to the transient separator 910. For example, the phase consistency information may be used by the transient separator to control the transient separation strength. The embodiment of Fig. 9 applies the finding that if residuals are transmitted within the coding scheme in a non-full band fashion, the signal power weighted mean phase differcnce bctwecn the rcsidual and the downmix (Acpresidua, bands) may be applied as broadband phasc information to the separated transients (Acp = Acplow residua_ bands). In this case, no additional phase information has to be transmitted, lowering the bit rate demand for the transient handling. In the embodiment of Fig. 9, the phase estimate from the residual bands may considerably deviate from the more precise broadband phase estimate that is available in the encoder. An option is therefore to transmit phase correction data (eg., Aqw,ion AcpLAcprcsidlial bands) so that the correct Acp are available in the decoder. However, since Acpco,„etlon may show a lower entropy than Acp, the necessary parameter data rate may be lower than the rate that would be needed for transmitting Acp. (This concept is similar to the general use of prediction in coding: instead of coding data directly, a predication error with lower entropy is coded. In the embodiment of Fig. 9, the prediction step is the extrapolation of the phase from the residual frequency bands to non-residual bands). The consistency of the phase difference in the residual frequency bands (Acp,cs,dua, band)) along the frequency axis may be used to control the transient separation strength. In embodiments, a decoder may receive phase information from an encoder, or the decoder may itself determine the phase information. Furthermore, the decoder may receive transient separation information from an encoder, or the decoder may itself determine the transient separation information. In embodiments, an aspect of the transient handling is the application of the "semantic dccorrelation" concept decribed in WO/2010/017967 together with the "transient decorrelator". which is based on multiplying the input with phase terms. The perccptual quality of rendered applause-like signals is improved since both processing steps avoid altering the temporal structure of transient signals. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of transients as well as phase relations between the transients is reconstructed in the output channels. Furthermore, embodimenss are also computationally efficient and can readily be integratcd into PS- or MPS- like upmix systems. In embodiments, the transient handling does not affect the mixing matrix process, so that all spatial rendering properties that are defined by the mixing matrix are also applied to the transient signal. In embodiments, a novel decollation scheme is applied which is particularly suited for the application in upmix systems, which is particularly suited to the application of spatial audio coding schemes like PS or MPS and which improves the perceptual quality of the output signals in the case of applause-iike signals, i.e. signals that contain dense mixtures of spatially distributed transients and/or may be seen as a particularly enhanced implementation of the generic "semantic decorrelation" framework. Furthermore, in embodimenss a novel deeorrelaiion scheme is comprised that reconstructs the spatial/temporal distribution of the transients similar to the distribution in the original signal. preserves the temporal structure of the transient signals, allows for varying the bit rate versus quality trade-off and/or is ideally suited for a combination with MPS features like non-full-band residuals or GES. The combinations are complementary, l.e.: information of standard MPS features is reused for the transient handling. Fig. 10 illustrates an apparatus for encoding an audio signal having a plurality of channels. Two input channels L, R are fed into a downmixer 1010 and into a residual signal calculator 1020. In other embodiments, a plurality of channels is fed into the downmixer 1010 and the residual signal calculator 1020, e.g., 3, 5 or 9 surround channels. The downmixer 1010 then downmixes the two channels L, R, to obtain a downmix signal. For cxample, the downmixer 1010 may employ a mixing matrix and conduct a matrix multiplicaiion of the mixing matrix and the two input channels L, R, to obtain the downmix signal. The downmix signal may be transmitted to a decoder. Furthermore, the residual signal generator 1020 is adapted to calculate a further signal which is referred to as residual signal. Residual signals are signals which can be used to regenerate the original signals by additionally employing the downmix signal and an upmix matrix. When, for example, N signals are downmixed to 1 signal, the downmix is typically I of the N componenss which result from the mapping of the N input signals. The rcmaining componenss resulting from the mapping (e.g., N-I components) are the residual signals and allow reconstruciing the original N signals by an inverse mapping. The mapping may, for example, be a rotation. The mapping shall be conducted such that the downmix signal is maximized and the residual signals are minimized, e.g., similar as a principal axis transformation. E.g., the energy of the downmix signal shall be maximized and the energies of the residual signals shall be minimized. When downmixing 2 signals to 1 signal, the downmix is normally one of the two componenss which result from the mapping of the 2 input signals. The remaining component resulting from the mapping is the residual signal and allows reconstruciing the original 2 signals by an inverse mapping. In some cases, the residual signal may represent an error associated with representing the two signals by their downmix and associated parameters. For example, the residual signal may be an error signal which represents the error between original channels L, R and channels L\ R\ resulting from upmixing the downmix signal that was generated based on the original channels Land R. In other words, a residual signal can be considered as a signal in the time domain or a frequency domain or a subband domain, which together with the downmix signal alone or with the downmix signal and parametric information allows a correct or nearly correct reconstruciion of an original channel. Nearly correct has to be understood that the reconstruciion with the residual signal having an energy greater than zero is closer to the original channel compared to a reconstruciion using the downmix without the residual signal or using the downmix and the parametric information without the residual signal. Furthermore, the encoder comprises a phase information calculator l030. The downmix signal and the residual signal are fed into the phase information calculator l030. The phase information calculator then calculates information on a phase difference between the downmix and the residual signal to obtain phase information. For example, the phase information calculator may apply functions that calculate a cross-correlatinn of the downmix and the residual signal. Moreover, the encoder comprises an output generator 1040. The phase information generated by the phase information calculator 1030 is fed into the output generator 1040 The output generator 1040 then outputs the phase information. In an embodiment the apparatus further comprises a phase information quantizer for quantizing the phase information. The phase information generated by the phase information calculator may be fed into the phase information quantizer. The phase information quantizer then quantizes the phase information. For example, the phase information may be mapped to 8 different values, e.g., to one of the values 0, 1^2 3 4 6 6 or 7. The values may represent the phase differences 0, 7t/4, TT/2, 3TT/4, n, ^3TU2 and 7K/4, respectively. The quantized phase information may then be fed into the output generator 1040. In a further embodimen,, the apparatus moreover comprises a lossless encoder. The phase information from the phase information calculator 1040 or the quantized phase information from the phase information quantizer may be fed into the lossless encoder. The lossless encoder is adapted to encode phase information by applying lossless encoding. Any kind of lossless coding scheme may be employed. For example, the encoder may employ arithmetic coding. The lossless encoder then feeds the losslessly encoded phase information into the output generator 1040. With respect to the decoder and encoder and the methods of the described embodimenss the following is mentioned: Although some aspects have been described in the context of an apparatus, it is clear that these aspects also represent a description of the corresponding method, where a block or device corresponds to a method step or a feature of a method step. Analogously, aspects described in the context of a method step also represent a description of a corresponding block or item or feature of a corresponding apparatus. Depending on certain implementation requirements, embodimenss of the invention can be implemented in hardware or in software. The implementation can be performed using a digital storage medium, for example a floppy disk, a DVD, a CD, a ROM, a PROM, an EPROM, an EEPROM or a FLASH memory, having electronically readable control signals stored thereon, which cooperate (or are capable of cooperating) with a programmable computer system such that the respective method is performed. Some embodimenss according to the invention comprise a data carrier having electronically readable control signals, which are capable of cooperating with a programmable computer system, such that one of the methods described herein is pcrformed. Generally, embodimenss of the present invention can be implemented as a computer program product with a program code, the program code being operative for performing one of the methods when the computer program product runs on a computer. The program code may for example be stored on a machine readable carrier. Other embodimenss comprise the computer program for performing one of the methods described herein. stored on a machine readable carrier or a non-transitory storage medium. In othcr words. an embodiment of the inventive method is, therefore, a computer program having a program code for performing one of the methods described herein, when the computer program runs on a computer. A further embodiment of the inventive methods is, therefore, a data carrier (or a digital storage medium, or a computer-readable medium) comprising, recorded thereon, the computer program for performing one of the methods described herein. A further embodiment of the inventive method is, therefore, a data stream or a sequence of signals representing the computer program for performing one of the methods described hcrein. The data stream or the sequence of signals may for example be configured to be transferred via a data communication connection, for example via the Internet. A further cmbodiment comprises a processing means, for example a computer, or a programmable logic device, configured to or adapted to perform one of the methods describcd herein. A further embodiment comprises a computer having installed thereon the computer program for performing one of the methods described herein. In some cmbodiments, a programmable logic device (for example a field programmabee gate array) may be used to perform some or all of the functionalities of the methods dcscribcd herein. In some cmbodiments, a field programmabee gate array may cooperate with a microprocessor in order to perform one of the methods described herein. Generally, the methods arc preferably performed by any hardware apparatus. The above described embodimenss are merely illustrative for the principles of the present invention. It is understood that modifications and variations of the arrangemenss and the details described herein will be apparent to others skilled in the art. It is the intent, therefore, to be limited only by the scope of the impending patent claims and not by the specific details presented by way of description and explanation of the embodimenss herein. Claims (Divisional Application 3) We Claim : 1. An apparatus for decoding a signal comprising: a transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) for separating an apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component such that the first signal component comprises transient signal portions of the input signal and such that the second signal component comprises non-transient signal portions of the input signal; a transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) for decorrelating the first signal component according to a first decorrelation method to obtain a first decorrelated signal component; a further second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) for decorrelating the second signal component according to a second decorrelation method to obtain a second decorrelated signal component, wherein the second decorrelation method is different from the first decorrelation method; a combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) for combining the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component to obtain a decorrelated combination signal; and a mixer (450; 552; 752; 952), being adapted to receive mixer input signals and being adapted to generate output signals based on the mixer input signals and a mixing matrix; wherein the combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) and the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) are arranged so that the decorrelated combination signal is fed into the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) as a first mixer input signal. 2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to receive correlation/coherence parameter data indicating a correlation or coherence between two signals and wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to generate the output signals based on the correlation/coherence parameter data. 3. An apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to receive level difference parameter data indicating an energy difference between two signals and wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is furthermore adapted to generate the output signals based on the level difference parameter data. 4. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the mixer (450; 552; 752; 952) is adapted to employ a mixing matrix which comprises the rule to multiply the first and second mixer input signal by a mixing matrix. 5. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the combining unit (340; 440; 540; 640; 740; 940) is adapted to combine the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component by adding the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component. 6. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to either feed a considered signal portion of the apparatus input signal into the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) or to feed the considered signal portion into the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) depending on transient separation information which either indicates that the considered signal portion comprises a transient or which indicates that the considered signal portion does not comprise a transient. 7. An apparatus according to one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to partially feed a considered signal portion of the apparatus input signal into the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) and to partially feed the considered signal portion into the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930), and wherein the amount of the considered signal portion that is fed into the transient separator and the amount of the considered signal portion that is fed into the second decorrelator depend on transient separation information. 8. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate an apparatus input signal which is represented in a frequency domain. 9. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate the apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component based on a frequency independent transient separation information. 10. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the transient separator (310; 410; 510; 610; 710; 910) is adapted to separate the apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component based on a frequency dependent transient separation information. 11. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the apparatus furthermore comprises a receiving unit (650) which is adapted to receive the phase information from an encoder; and wherein the transient decorrelator (320; 420; 520; 620; 720; 920) is adapted to apply the phase information from the encoder to the first signal component. 12. An apparatus according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the second decorrelator (330; 430; 530; 630; 730; 930) is a lattice IIR decorrelator. 13. A method for decoding a signal comprising: separating an apparatus input signal into a first signal component and into a second signal component such that the first signal component comprises transient signal portions of the apparatus input signal and such that the second signal component comprises non-transient signal portions of the apparatus input signal; decorrelating the first signal component by a transient decorrelator according to a first decorrelation method to obtain a first decorrelated signal component; decorrelating the second signal component by a further second decorrelator according to a second decorrelation method to obtain a second decorrelated signal component, wherein the second decorrelation method is different from the first decorrelation method; combining the first decorrelated signal component and the second decorrelated signal component to obtain a decorrelated combination signal; and generating output signals based on a mixing matrix and the decorrelated combination signal. 14. A computer program implementing a method according to claim 13.
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 202138019347-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 2 | 202138019347-PROOF OF RIGHT [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 3 | 202138019347-FORM 1 [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 4 | 202138019347-FIGURE OF ABSTRACT [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 5 | 202138019347-DRAWINGS [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 6 | 202138019347-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 7 | 202138019347-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [27-04-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-04-27 |
| 8 | 202138019347-Information under section 8(2) [29-05-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-05-29 |
| 9 | 202138019347-FORM-26 [15-06-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-06-15 |
| 10 | 202138019347-FORM 18 [30-08-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-08-30 |
| 11 | 202138019347-Information under section 8(2) [14-09-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-09-14 |
| 12 | 202138019347-Information under section 8(2) [04-04-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-04-04 |
| 13 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [14-09-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-09-14 |
| 14 | 202138019347-FER.pdf | 2022-09-14 |
| 15 | 202138019347-Information under section 8(2) [08-03-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-03-08 |
| 16 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [08-03-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-03-08 |
| 17 | 202138019347-Information under section 8(2) [09-03-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-03-09 |
| 18 | 202138019347-FORM 4(ii) [09-03-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-03-09 |
| 19 | 202138019347-OTHERS [14-06-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-06-14 |
| 20 | 202138019347-FER_SER_REPLY [14-06-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-06-14 |
| 21 | 202138019347-CLAIMS [14-06-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-06-14 |
| 22 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [27-09-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-09-27 |
| 23 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [18-01-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-01-18 |
| 24 | 202138019347-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-17-05-2024).pdf | 2024-05-02 |
| 25 | 202138019347-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [13-05-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-05-13 |
| 26 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [14-05-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-05-14 |
| 27 | 202138019347-FORM-26 [15-05-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-05-15 |
| 28 | 202138019347-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-12-06-2024).pdf | 2024-05-17 |
| 29 | 202138019347-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [07-06-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-06-07 |
| 30 | 202138019347-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-08-07-2024).pdf | 2024-06-11 |
| 31 | 202138019347-Correspondence to notify the Controller [03-07-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-07-03 |
| 32 | 202138019347-Written submissions and relevant documents [23-07-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-07-23 |
| 33 | 202138019347-FORM 3 [23-07-2024(online)].pdf | 2024-07-23 |
| 34 | 202138019347-PatentCertificate30-07-2024.pdf | 2024-07-30 |
| 35 | 202138019347-IntimationOfGrant30-07-2024.pdf | 2024-07-30 |
| 1 | 202138019347DIVISONALSEARCHSTRATERGYE_14-09-2022.pdf |
| 2 | 202138019347AMENDEDSEARCHSTRATERGYAE_17-01-2024.pdf |