Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Applications Of Nanoscale Zno In Peanut Crop

Abstract: This invention describes the use of nanoscale zinc oxide particles on plant growth and development. In view of the widespread cultivation of peanut in India and in other parts of the globe and in view of the potential influence of zinc on its growth, this plant was chosen as the model system. Peanut seeds were separately treated with nanoscale ZnO and chelated bulk zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) suspensions (a common zinc supplement used for comparison) at different concentartions, respectively and the effect this treatment had on seed germination, seedling vigor, plant growth, flowering, chlorophyll content, pod yield and root growth were evaluated. Treatment of nanoscale ZnO (25 nm mean particle size) at 1000 ppm concentration promoted both seed germination and seedling vigor and in turn showed early establishment in soil manifested by early flowering and higher leaf chlorophyll content. These particles proved effective in increasing stem and root growth. Pod yield per plant was 34% higher compared to -chelated bulk ZnSO4 at the same concentration of nanoscale ZnO. Consequently, a field experiment was conducted during Rabi seasons of 2008-'09 and 2009-10 with the foliar application of nanoscale ZnO particles at 15 times lower dose compared to the chelated ZnSO4 recommended and 29.5% and 26.3% higher pod yield were recorded, respectively in these seasons compared to chelated ZnSO4.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
19 October 2011
Publication Number
25/2013
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
AGRICULTURE ENGINEERING
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2018-12-18
Renewal Date

Applicants

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
IIT P.O, CHENNAI 600 036

Inventors

1. THALAPPIL PRADEEP
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, CHENNAI - 600 036
2. TOLLAMADUGU NAGA VENKATA KRISHNA VARA PRASAD
D.NO. 15-18, PADMAVATHINAGAR, NEAR V.K.C. SUPER MARKET, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATI - 517 502
3. PALAGIRI SUDHAKAR
D.NO. 18-1-323 (APT.NO.203), SREEPADA NILAYAM, BHAVANINAGAR, TIRUPATI - 517 502
4. THERUVAKKATTIL SREENIVASAN SREEPRASAD
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, CHENNAI - 600 036
5. PANIKKANVALAPPIL RAVINDRANATHAN SAJANLAL
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, CHENNAI - 600 036

Specification

FIELD OF INVENTION

[001] This invention discloses the efficacy of custom made nanoscale zinc oxide (ZnO) particles on the growth and development of peanut (or groundnut - Arachis hypogaea L). The present invention comprises of applications of nanoscale ZnO particles (mean particle size 25 nm) prepared using the oxalate decomposition technique, for the above crop to get the desired results in seed germination, seedling vigour index, and various yield parameters. This has been achieved by supplementing nanoscale ZnO by various methods such as seed treatment and foliar spray. The invention emphasizes that nanoscale ZnO particles can be applied to the crops either through seed dressing or by foliar application with much reduced doses in comparison to bulk and commonly used materials. The efficiency was compared with zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) formulations which are common Zn supplements.

PRIOR ART

[002] Zinc (Zn) is an essential mineral for a wide variety of physiological and biochemical processes in all organisms. The deficiency of Zn can cause severe health hazards in humans and Zn supplementation is particularly required in children to achieve reduction of morbidity and mortality which is often difficult to achieve in developing countries. (Bhutta, Z. A., Black, R. E., Brown, K. H., Gardner, J. M., Gore, S., Hidayat, A., Khatun, F., Martorell, R, Ninh, N. X., Penny, M. E., Rosado, J. L, Roy, S. K., Ruel, M., Sazawal, S., Shankar, A. 1999. Prevention of diarrhea and pneumonia by zinc supplementation in children in developing countries: pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Pediatrics 135:689-697, Sazawal S., Black, R. E., Menon, V. P., Dhingra, P., Caulfield, L. E., Dhingra, U., Bagati, A. 2001. Zinc supplementation in infants born small for gestational age reduces mortality: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 108:1280-1286.) Plants also greatly suffer from the deficiency of Zn. Zn being an essential component of various enzyme systems for energy production, protein synthesis, and growth regulation, its deficiency in plants will be demonstrated by delayed maturity. This suggests that there is a need for a constant supply of available Zn for optimum growth in plants. The short internodes and a decrease in leaf size and delayed maturity are the most common symptoms of Zn-deficient plants. For humans, Zn supplementation through food is a powerful therapeutic tool in managing a long list of illnesses. Hence, it is suggested that a considerable amount of research should be devoted to develop technologies for enhanced uptake and accumulation of micronutrients, in particular Zn, in edible plant parts.

[003] Zinc occurs in a wide variety of foods, but is relatively high in nuts, legumes and whole grain cereals. Peanut or groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L) is one of the top ten foods rich in Zn [100 g of oil-roasted peanuts will provide 6.6 mg (44% RDA) of Zn]. Peanut has high protein and high oil content. Hence, as an important oil and legume food crop, it is grown in 108 countries around the world. Zinc deficiency in groundnut causes irregular mottling and interveinal chlorosis in leaves. In India, about 50% of groundnut soils show Zn deficiencies causing considerable yield loss (Singh, A. L. 1999. Mineral nutrition of groundnut. In: Hemantharajan, A (Ed.). Advances in plant physiology. 161-200, Scientific publications (India) Jodhpur.; Singh, A. L, Basu, M. S., Singh, N. B. 2004. Mineral disorders of groundnut. National Research centre for groundnut Junagadh, India, 85, ICAR Publications, ICAR, New Delhi). Thus there is a need to invent novel stratergies for the effective delivery of Zn nutrition which plays an important role in stepping up the productivity of groundnut. The increase in productivity of peanut can be an important step forward in helping to reduce the Zn deficiency and the related hazards to human kind. Though India has largest area under cultivation for groundnut (about 8 million ha of land), the low productivity is mainly due to the fact that the crop is mostly grown in rain-fed, low fertility soils.

[004] Peanuts fall into four basic types: Runner, Virginia, Spanish and Valencia. Each of these peanuts is distinctive in size and flavour. Demand for peanuts has been steady with a growing range of value added peanut products (peanut butter, milk, flour in jelly, confectionary, cookies and candies). Increases in price of these peanut products are reported every time with fall in peanut production. There is a lucrative market for peanut worldwide. Though India has largest area under cultivation for peanut (about 8 million ha of land), the low productivity is mainly due to the fact that the crop is mostly grown in rain-fed, low fertility soils.

[005] Higher plants generally absorb Zn as a divalent cation (Zn2+) which acts either as . the metal component of enzymes or as a functional, structural or a regulatory co-factor of a large number of enzymes. Most of the research conducted on the micronutrient nutrition of peanut crop deals with the application of Zn along with other nutrients to influence the growth, yield and productivity (Gowda, G. N., Shivaraj, B. Gowda, A. 1994. Effect of zinc and molybdenum application on yield and uptake of zinc by groundnut. Journal of Research, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University 22: 40-42.; Majumdar, B., Venkatesh, M.S., Lai, B., Kumar, K., Singh, C. S. 2001. Effect of phosphorous and zinc nutrition on groundnut in an acid hapludatf of Meghalaya. Annales Agriculturae Research New Series 22:354-359, Geeta, K. N., Shankar, A. G, Shiva Shankar, K. 1996. Effect of molybdenum, zinc and calcium on productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea Gaertu). Journal of Oilseeds Research 13:167-172).

[006] The methods that have been in the art to deliver Zn to plants use Zn in the form of Zn salts and chelates. Because of the high solubility of Zn salts in water, a Zn salt, such as Zn sulphate or a chelated form, delivers Zn through the roots or foliage systems of a plant. These are the preferred and accepted methods for increasing the Zn levels within . a plant. Hence farmers are widely using sulphates and chelated ZnSO4, (Zn with ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, EDTA) for soil and foliar applications. However, the efficacy of such methods is low and high concentrations of Zn are needed to obtain the desired results. One disadvantage with these forms of Zn is that they are very soluble in water and tend to wash off foliage with dew and precipitation. Furthermore, Zn salts are more difficult and expensive to formulate in combination with other agents or fertilizers.

The prior art /patents dealing with this aspect are given below:

a) United States Patent US 3130034, Zinc containing liquid fertilizer.

b) United States Patent 3620708, Liquid fertilizers including zoluble zinc from zinc oxide.

c) United States Patent Application 3930832, Inhibition of corrosive action of zinc-containing fertilizer solutions.

d) United States Patent 4025330, Zinc-containing foliar spray.

e) United States Patent 5667795, Pesticidal micronutrient compositions containing zinc oxide.

[007] Despite these earlier efforts, there is a need for a method which is less expensive to formulate and to deliver Zn more effectively to plants. In the United States Patent 3130034, one method of Zn containing liquid fertilizer wherein an aqueous solution formulated by incorporating ZnSO4 in aqueous ammonia was described to provide a solution with a desirable salt out temperature. Unfortunately, aqueous solutions of ZnSO4 corrode milled steel and form large quantities of scale and rust in process tanks and equipment. Hence, in another method, the formulation consisted of water, ZnO, phosphorous pentoxide, and ammonia to create ammonia based fertilizer in solution providing nitrogen, phosphorous and solubilised Zn.

[008] It is well understood that the particle size may affect agronomic effectiveness of Zn fertilizers. Decreased particle size results in increased number of particles per unit weight of applied Zn. Decreased particle size also increases the specific surface area of a fertilizer, which should increase the dissolution rate of fertilizers with low solubility in water such as ZnO (Mortvedt, J. J., 1992. Crop response to level of water soluble Zn in granular Zn fertilizers, Fertilizer Research 33:249-255). Granular ZnSO4 (1.4 to 2 mm) was somewhat less effective than fine ZnSO4 (0.8 to 1.2 mm). Gradual increase in Zn uptake was observed with decreasing granule size and only the powder form produced plants with Zn concentrations in the sufficient range. Since granules of 1.5 mm weighs less than granules of 2.0 or 2.5 mm, smaller granules were used for the same weight, resulting in a better distribution of Zn, higher surface area of contact of Zn fertilizer resulted in better Zn uptake (Liscano, J. F., Wilson, C. E., Norman, R. J. Jr., Slaton, N. A. 2000. Zinc availability to rice from seven granular fertilizers. AAES Research Bulletin 963:1-31). Therefore, ample work has been done and emphasis was made on the particle size to increase the efficiency of the fertilizers for better uptake and higher yields. To solve the problem of particle size, recent advances in materials science and chemistry have produced mastery in nanoparticle technology, with wide applications in the field of agriculture. Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize the food and agricultural industry with new tools for rapid disease detection, enhancing the ability of plants to absorb nutrients, etc. Extensive reports on the use of nanoparticles and their effectiveness and/or the biological effects on higher plants are available in open literature and few prior arts are reported below.

a) WIPO Patent Application WO2011059507, Method of using carbon nanotubes to affect seed germination and plant growth.

b) United States Patent Application 20110094277, Nano-scale urea particles and methods of making and using the particles.

c) United States Patent Application 20110000411, Biologically active multifuctional nanochips and method of application thereof for production of high-quality seed.

d) United States Patent Application 20100139347, Nano-composite super absorbent containing fertilizer nutrients used in agriculture.

e)WIPO Patent Application WO/2010/068275, Silica based antibacterial and antifungal nanoformulation United States Patent Application 20100326153, Preparation of a nano long-acting selenium fertilizer.

f) Ma, Y., Kuang, L, He. X., Bai, W., Ding, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Chai, Z. 2010. Effects of rare earth oxide nanoparticles on root elongation of plants. Chemosphere 78:273-9.

g) United States Patent Application 20090075818, Nanosilver for preservation and treatment of diseases in agriculture field.

h) Seeger, E. M., Baun, A., Kastner, M., Trapp, S., 2009. Insignificant acute toxicity of Ti02 nanoparticles to Willow trees, Journal of Soils and Sediments 9:46-53.

i) Doshi, R., Braida, W., Christodoulatos, C, Wazne, M., O'connor, G., 2008. Nano aluminium: transport through sand columns and environmental effects on plant and soil communities. Environmental Research 106:296-303.

j) Zhu, H., Han, J., Xiao, J.Q., Jin, Y., 2008. Uptake, translocation and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 10:713-717.

k) Racuciu, M., Creanga, D., 2007. TMA-OH coated magnetic nanoparticles internalized in vegetal tissues. Romanian Journal of Physics 52:395-402.

I) WIPO Patent Application WO/2006/049379, Composition for controlling pathogenic microorganisms in plants.

m)Nel, A., Xia, T., Madler, L, Li, N., 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622-627.

n)Yang, F., Hong, F. S., You, W. J., Liu, C, Gao, F. Q., Wu, C, Yang, P. 2006. Influences of nano-anatase HO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 110:179-190.

o) Hong, F. S., Yang, F., Ma, Z. N., Zhou, J., Liu, C, Wu, C, Yang, P., 2005. Influences of nano-TiCb on the chloroplast ageing of spinach under light. Biological Trace Element Research 104:249-260.

p) Yang L., Watts, D. J. 2005. Particle surface characteristics may play an important role in phytotoxicity of alumina nanoparticles. Toxicology Letters 158:122-132.

q) Lu, C. M., Zhang, C. Y., Wen, J. Q., Wu, G. R., Tao, M. X. 2002. Research of the effect of nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of glycine max and its mechanism. Soya Bean Science 21:168-172.

r) Lin, D., Xing, B., 2007. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environmental Pollution 150:243-250.

s) Zhang, L., Hong, F., Lu, S., Liu, C, 2005. Effect of nano Ti02 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 105:83-91.

[009] A few important highlights from the work reported in the prior art is as follows: Different plants have different response to the same nanoparticles. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles on plants was reported at concentrations greater than 2000 ppm.

Properties of engineered nanoparticles depend on the size, shape, surface functionalisation, etc. Carbon-based and metal-based nanoparticles are most commonly engineered and are often studied. However, research on ZnO nanoparticles has been voluminous in prior art although most of those are not of relevance to agriculture.

[010] ZnO nanomaterial is unique with a long history of use in many researches including agriculture. The synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles has been attempted by various physical and chemical methods. The effect of surface modification on the size, structure, morphology, and other properties of ZnO nanoparticles are demonstrated. The biosynthesis and characterization of ZnO have been attempted in natural sources like microbes, algae and/or plants (Brayner, R., Dahoumane, S. A., Yprmian, C, Djediat, C, Meyer, M., Cout, A., Fivet, F. 2010. ZnO Nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and ecotoxicological studies. Langmuir 26:6522-6528). Numerous methods of phytoextraction/ hyper accumulating plant mediated biosynthesis of ZnO nanoparticles are reported (Qu, J., Yuan, X., Wang, X., Shao, P. 2011 Zinc accumulation and synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using Physalis alkekengi L.

Environmental Pollution 159:1783-1788; Qu, J., Luo, C, Hou, J. 2011. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles from Zn-hyperaccumulator {Sedum alfredii Hance) plants, Micro & Nano Letters, IET 6:174-176). The antimicrobial property of ZnO nanoparticles not only finds use in food processing and health sector but also in producing antimicrobial textiles (Rajendra, R., Balakumar, C, Ahammed, H. A. M., Jayakumar, S., Vaideki, K., Rajesh, E. 2010. Use of ZnO nanoparticles for production of antimicrobial textiles, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2:202-208).

[011] Nanomaterials are proposed to be the materials of choice to solve the problem of particle size that may affect agronomic effectiveness of Zn in crops. The methodologies adopted in most of the previous methods for ZnO nanomaterial growth and formations have specific applicability based on specific need. Improvements in the method of making ZnO nanoparticle for application in plants are relatively need based. In several cases, the application of ZnO nanoparticles above a specific concentration was found to have detrimental effects on the plant growth. Hence, there exist a need to formulate strategies to create ZnO-based nanomaterials which can be applied to crops at optimum concentrations for better uptake and higher transfer inside the plant, thereby increasing crop yield besides increasing its bio-availability in plant parts. Peanut, being one of the most important oil seed cum legume plants having large area under cultivation all over the world, especially in India, was chosen as the model plant system for this invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[012] Considering all aspects described above, we have invented a method where custom made nanoscale ZnO particles can be used for application in peanut that essentially consists of application methods for enhancing Zn concentrations in seed and/or other parts of the plant. Owing to a high surface area to volume ratio, the nanofertilizers can be used for Zn nutrition in plants. The evaluation to assess the potential of nanomaterials in plants by accurate in vitro/in vivo screening assays is a highly desirable goal.

[013] This invention was taken up to demonstrate the promotory or inhibitory effects of various concentrations of custom made nanoscale ZnO particles on growth, development and final yield of peanut.

[014] In India, Andhra Pradesh is second largest peanut producing state after Gujarat. Peanut seeds of variety K-134 were procured from Agricultural Research Station, Kadiri, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Experimental methods
Material characterisation
ZnO nanoparticles characterisation

[015] The ZnO nanoparticles used in this invention was characterised using high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL 3010), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 200) and energy dispersive analysis of X-rays (EDAX, FEI Quanta 200). For SEM and EDAX measurements, the ZnO nanoparticles prepared as mentioned in the experimental section was re-suspended in water by sonication for 10 min and drop casted on an indium tin oxide (ITO) conducting glass plates and dried. Thin sections of the seed were stuck on conducting carbon tape and EDAX measurements were carried out. The TEM samples were prepared by drop casting the suspensions on carbon coated Cu grids. The post harvest leaf and kernel samples were analyzed to estimate the Zn content by using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS).

Example 1

[016] This embodiment comprises of the synthesis of extremely small ZnO nanoparticles via a modified oxalate decomposition technique and their subsequent applications in developing highly efficient peanut seeds. In a typical synthesis, zinc oxalate was prepared by mixing equimolar (0.2 M) solutions of zinc acetate and oxalic acid. The resultant precipitate was collected and rinsed extensively with double deionized water (Dl-water) and dried in air. The oxalate was then ground and decomposed in air by placing it in a pre-heated furnace at 500 °C for 45 minutes. This approach also offers extremely small nano magnesium oxide (3-7 nm) in relation to the existing combustion based synthesis methods. ZnO nanoparticles of mean crystallite size of 25 nm diameter were synthesised and were used in this invention.

Example 2

[017] In order to evaluate nanoscale ZnO on peanut germination, the following protocol was adopted. Chelated bulk ZnSO4 was used as a reference Zn source. Because bulk ZnO will not dissolve in water, we used chelated ZnSO4 as the reference with equal Zn content. This material was suspended directly in deionised water and dispersed by ultrasonic vibration (100 W, 40 KHz) for 30 min. Magnetic bars were placed in the suspensions for stirring before use to avoid aggregation of the particles. Both bulk (chelated) ZnSO4 and nanoscale ZnO suspensions were prepared at concentrations of 400, 1000 and 2000 ppm (concentrations referred to in terms of Zn content). Five peanut seeds were soaked in 100 mL of these solutions/suspensions of both bulk ZnSO4 and nanoscale ZnO for 3 h. Four replicates were maintained. The suspensions were labelled such that B and N refer to bulk ZnSO4 and nanoscale ZnO, respectively.

For example, 400B and 400N referred to suspensions of 400 ppm bulk ZnSO4 and nanoscale ZnO, respectively. The nanoscale suspensions, as expected, appeared as clear solutions. The pH of all the prepared suspensions was found to be 6.8-7.0. A control was also maintained, corresponding to pure water.

Example 3

[018] With one set of treated seeds (4 replicates) explained in the Example 2, lab experiments were conducted to determine the effect of treatment on seed germination and seedling vigour index. Treated peanut seeds were shade-dried for 1 h. Then the seeds were placed in a'Petri dish (100 mm x15 mm) with one piece of sterilized filter paper and 5 mL of water was added (as per the recommendations of the International Seed Testing Association, 1976). Petri dishes were covered and placed in an incubator 1 at 26±1 °C for 8 days. Watering was given to all plates. After 8 days, maximum seeds were germinated and developed into normal seedlings. Germination was calculated based on the number of seeds germinated in a Petri plate having 5 seeds and expressed as germination percentage. "Seedling Vigour Index" (SVI) was calculated by the formula described by Abdul-Baki and Anderson (Abdul-Baki, A. A., Anderson, J. D. 1973. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13:630-633).
Seed Vigour Index = Germination % x (root length (cm) + shoot length(cm)) /

Example 4

[019] In this example, pot culture experiments were carried out with a set of treated
peanut seeds (4 replicates) explained in Example 2, sown in pots (20 cm x 40 cm) filled with equal quantity of soil and watered to field capacity. Proper care was taken to use similar soil in all the pots to minimize soil heterogeneity effects. After germination, one plant per pot was maintained throughout. Proper agronomic and plant protection management was done to all the treated plants for their maximum growth expression. The following data were collected on all the plants of four replications.

a) Plant height was measured from ground node to shoot growing apex and expressed in cm before harvest.

b) Days to flowering were calculated based on the days taken from sowing to the appearance of first flower.

c) The procedure developed by Witham et al., was followed for estimation of chlorophyll content of leaves (Witham, F. H., Blaydes, D. F., Devlin, R. M. 1971.
Chlorophyll absorption spectrum and quantitative determinations, "Experiments in Plant Physiology". Von Nostra and Ren FOLD Company New York, pp 55-56.).

Example 5

[020] After 110 days from sowing, plants were uprooted gently along with the whole soil mass. Plant with whole root was recovered by spraying fine water on the soil mass.

Roots were separated and used for recording the parameters. Similarly, matured, filled and unfilled pods were dried to the moisture level of 12% and dry weight per plant was recorded.

[021] Roots were thoroughly washed and their volume was measured by water
replacement method which was expressed in mL and total length was measured and expressed in cm. Then the roots were dried for two days at 80 °C in an oven and dry weight was taken and expressed in grams.

Example 6

[022] The field experiment was conducted with peanut (Narayani) during Rabi seasons (2008-'09, 2009-'10). The Zn application was done in two ways viz, foliar spray (in the field) and seed treatment (pot culture). The experiment was laid out in randomised block design replicated 7 times. The gross plot size was 4x5 m2. Three treatments viz., Ti: NPK (30-40-50), T2: NPK + chelated Zn @30 g/15 L Foliar spray (at 35 days and 70 days), and T3: NPK + nanoscale ZnO (size 25 nm) @ 2 g /15 I foliar spray (at 35 days and 70 days) were imposed. The initial soil (red sandy loam) parameters were pH: 6.85, E.C. (dSm"1): 0.132, O.C. %: 0.485, available P205: 14.43 kg ha"1, K20: 172 kg ha'1, Zn: 0.74 ppm, Cu: 1.55 ppm, Fe: 9.93 ppm and Mn: 28.06 ppm. Plant physiological parameters viz., plant height, and number of branches was recorded in all the treatments.

Example 7

[023] Each treatment was conducted with seven replicates and the results were presented as mean ± standard error (SE). The statistical analysis of experimental data utilized the ANOVA program. Each experimental value was compared to its corresponding control. Statistical significance was accepted when the probability of the result assuming the null hypothesis (p) is less than 0.05 (level of probability).


DRAWINGS AND TABULATED DATA

Figure captions

[024] Figure 1: Large area TEM image of ZnO nanoparticles. Inset shows the high resolution image of a single particle.

[025] Figure 2: (A) SEM image of the peanut seed embryo after soaking in nanoscale ZnO (1000 ppm) for 3 h. (B, C, D) EDAX images of the region in A using Zn La, C Ka and N Ka lines. (E) EDAX spectrum from the region in A.

[026] Figure 3: Photographs of the seeds showing differences in germination and root growth (A) after three days and (B) nine days after the treatment.

[027] Figure 4: (a) Higher root growth of peanut plant after nanoscale ZnO treatment (1000 ppm). The plants were uprooted after 110 days, (b) Pot culture experiment showing higher plant growth after nanoscale ZnO treatment (1000 ppm), after 110 days.

[028] Figure 5: Bar chart showing the effect of nanoscale ZnO (N) and bulk ZnSO4 (B) concentrations on peanut root stem growth and pod yield.

[029] Figure 6: Photograph showing the effect of foliar application of lower dosage of nanoscale ZnO on the pbd yield. A and B) nanoscale ZnO @ 2 g/15 I and C) control.

[030] Table 1: Effect of nanoscale ZnO and bulk ZnSO4 on peanut mean germination and vigor.

[031] Table 2: Effect of nanoscale ZnO and bulk ZnSO4 on peanut mean plant growth, flowering and leaf chlorophyll content.

[032] Table 3: Effect of nanoscale ZnO and bulk ZnSO4 on mean root growth, shoot growth, dry weight and pod yield in peanut.

[033] Table 4: Response of peanut to application of nanoscale ZnO.

[034] Table 5: Effect of nanoscale Zn on yield and yield attributes of peanut (Rabi season 2008-09).

[035] Table 6: Effect of nanoscale Zn on yield and yield attributes of peanut (Rabi season 2009-10).

[036] Table 7: Effect of nanoscale ZnO on uptake of Zn by leaf and kernel of peanut.

DESCRIPTION WITH REFERENCE TO DRAWINGS AND TABULATED DATA

ZnO nanoparticle characterization

[037]. The HRTEM image (Figure 1) shows ZnO nanoparticles with mean particle diameter of 25 nm and they looked slightly aggregated as there were no protecting ligands on the surface. The particles are crystalline as revealed by the high magnification image and the lattice of ZnO is clearly seen.

Confirmation of Zn uptake by seeds

[038] The uptake of Zn by the seeds was confirmed by SEM-EDAX measurements (Figure 2). SEM of thin sections of the peanut embryo was examined by sectioning the seed. Although the concentration of Zn was low as expected, it could be observed in EDAX spectra and the EDAX images confirmed the presence of higher amounts of Zn in regions where C and N concentrations are higher in the seeds treated with nanoscale ZnO. The leaf and kernel samples were analyzed post harvest using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). This also confirmed the presence of Zn (Table 7).

Seed germination and seedling vigor

[039] Peanut seeds responded variably towards the treatment at various concentrations of both bulk ZnSO4 (Chelated) and nanoscale ZnO particles. Seed treated with 1000 ppm nanoscale ZnO recorded significant germination (100%) and seedling vigour index (1701.3). Root growth was also very good as can be observed from the picture (Figure 3). The results from the bulk ZnSO4 treated seeds were not promising (Table 1). Among the different ZnO concentrations, 1000 ppm showed the maximum seedling vigour index but a concentration of 2000 ppm showed a decrease. Such inhibitory effects of nanoparticles were also reported by Lin and Xing (Lin, D., and B. Xing. 2007. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environmental Pollution 150:243-250) on radish, rape and rye grass. However, performance of the bulk material is better than the control.

[040] Nanoscale ZnO described in this embodiment showed large root growth of seedling compared to bulk ZnSO4 and control. Such promotory effect of nanoscale Si02 and Ti02 on germination was reported in soya bean (Lu, C. M., C. Y. Zhang., J. Q. Wen., G. R. Wu., and M. X. Tao. 2002. Research of the effect of Nanometer materials on germination and growth enhancement of Glycine max and its mechanism. Soya Bean Science 21:168-172), in which authors noticed increased nitrate reductase enzyme activity and enhanced antioxidant system. Plant growth, in terms of plant height was significantly increased with 400 and 1000 ppm of nanoscale ZnO compared to control and the respective bulk ZnSO4 concentrations (Table 2). Seeds treated with 1000 ppm concentration of nanoscale ZnO recorded highest plant growth (15.4 cm) due to extended inter-nodal length. Such increase can be ascribed to higher precursor activity of nanoscale ZriO in auxin production (Kobayashi, Y., and S. Mizutani. 1970. Studies on the wilting treatment of corn plant: The influence of the artificial auxin control in nodes on the behaviour of rooting. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan / 39:213-220). Similarly 1000 ppm nanoscale ZnO produced early flowers compared to control and bulk ZnSO4. Such effects can be due to higher seedling vigour and early vegetative growth. Nanoscale ZnO increased leaf chlorophyll content irrespective of concentrations compared to bulk ZnSO4 and control. Nanoscale ZnO at 1000 ppm recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll content (1.97 mg/g). Higher chlorophyll accumulation may be due to complementary effect of other inherent nutrients like magnesium, iron and sulphur. Similar results were observed by Zhang et al., 2005 (Zhang, L, F. Hong., S. Lu., and C. Liu. 2005. Effect of nano Ti02 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research 105:83-91) when Spinacia oleracea seeds were treated with nanoscale Ti02 particles. An increase of germination rate and the vigor indices was noted at 0.25-4% nanoscale Ti02 treatment. During the growth period, the plant dry weight increased. These results confirmed that the physiological effects were related to the nanometre sized particles.

Root growth and yield

[041] The plants cultured as per the present invention were harvested after 110 days from sowing. The results revealed the promotory effect of nanoscale ZnO at optimum concentrations and inhibitory effect at high concentrations on root and shoot growth (Figure 4) and pod yield (Table 3). Nanoscale ZnO at 1000 ppm proved to be effective in improving both root volume and root dry weight, as it was also noticed in the seedling stage (Figure 5). An increase of the shoot/root ratio compared to that of the control was reported by Shah and Belozerova (Shah, V., I. Belozerova. 2009. Influence of metal nanoparticles on the soil microbial community and germination of lettuce seeds. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 97:143-148) while analyzing the influence of metal nanoparticles on germination of Lactuca seeds. Due to its promotory effects on plant growth, pod yields were significantly increased over control and ZnSO4. At higher concentration of nanoscale ZnO, at 2000 ppm, both plant growth and pod yield decreased and these results were in accordance with the reports on radish, rape, corn, lettuce and cucumber by Lin and Xing, 2007 (Lin, D., and B. Xing. 2007. Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth. Environmental Pollution 150:243-250).

Yield and yield attributes

[042] The results revealed that the response of groundnut to lower dose of nanoscale ZnO was highly significant. The dry pod yield of groundnut was greatly influenced by nanoscale ZnO (Figure 6). Figure 6 A and B show increased pod yield upon application of nanoscale ZnO @ 2 g/15 L. The data in Table 4 indicate significant increase in . number of pods per plant, number of filled pods per plant, and also plant height with the application of nanoscale ZnO @ 2 g/15 L. From the data in Table 5, and Table 6 it is observed that 30.5% and 38.8% higher pod yield was recorded with the application of nanoscale ZnO @2 g/15 L + NPK compared to NPK alone and 29.5% and 26.3% higher pod yield compared to chelated Zn@30 g/15 L + NPK. In general, foliar application of nanoscale ZnO @ 2 g /15 L described in this invention could significantly increase pod yield and shelling percent and other biometric parameters. Figure 6C shows the control experiment at similar conditions showing lower yield.

Discussion of relevant results

[043] Zinc plays a fundamental role in protecting and maintaining structural stability of cell membranes (Welch, R. M., M. J. Webb., and J. F. Loneragan. 1982. Zinc in membrane function and its role in phosphorus toxicity. Scaife A (ed) Proceedings of the Ninth Plant Nutrition Colloquium, pp. 710-715. Warwick, UK. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; Cakmak, I. 2000. Role of Zn in protecting plant cells from reactive oxygen species. New Phytologist 146:185-205). Zn is used for protein synthesis, membrane function, cell elongation and tolerance to environmental stresses (Cakmak, I. 2000. Role of zinc in protecting plant cells from reactive oxygen species. New Phytologist 146:185-205). Plants emerging from seeds with low Zn concentration have poor seedling vigor and field establishment on Zn-deficient soils (Yilmaz, A., H. Ekiz., I. Gultekin., B. Torun., H. Barut., S. Karanlik., and I. Cakmak. 1998. Effect of seed zinc content on grain yield and zinc concentration of wheat growth in zinc-deficient calcareous soils. Journal of / Plant Nutrition 21:2257-2264). Rengel and Graham (Rengel, Z., and R. D. Graham.1995. Importance of seed Zn content for wheat growth on Zn-deficient soil. I. Vegetative growth, Plant and Soil 173:259-266) reported from pot culture experiments on wheat plants that increasing seed Zn content from 0.25 ug per seed to 0.70 ug per seed significantly improved root and shoot growth under Zn deficiency. Hence it may be concluded that high Zn-content in seed could act as a starter fertilizer. Ajouri et al., (Aiouri, A., H. Asgedom, M. Becker. 2004. Seed priming enhances germination and seedling growth of barley under conditions of P and Zn deficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 167:630-636) reported that seed priming with Zn was very effective in improving seed germination and seedling development in barley. Slaton et a/., (Slaton, N.A., C. E. Wilson., S. Ntamatungiro., R. J. Norman., D. L. Boothe. 2001. Evaluation of Zn seed treatments for rice. Agronomy Journal 93:152-157) reported that treating rice seeds with Zn greatly increased grain yield and concluded that this type of Zn application method is a very economical alternative to more expensive broadcast Zn fertilizer applications. These results may indicate that high Zn concentration in seeds has very important physiological roles during seed germination and early seedling growth. In the present invention, treating groundnut seeds with nanoscale ZnO particles with a concentration of 1000 ppm has shown significant increment in germination, shoot length, root length and vigour index over other concentrations of the same material and varying concentrations of another material (chelated ZnSO4) tested. Further experiments are required to unravel the factors favouring optimal dose and/or causes for negative effects at higher concentrations of nanoscale ZnO in the seed treatments.

[044] Foliar fertilization is reported to be more effective than soil application. Foliar Zn application significantly increased grain Zn concentrations of wheat grains indicating high mobility of Zn within plants. Spraying with 0.5% ZnSO4 gave significantly higher peanut pod yield compared to no spraying. However, soil application of 10 kg ha1 ZnSO4 at sowing gave yield on par with no ZnSO4 application. This indicates that groundnut responds to foliar spray but not to soil application (Channabasavanna, A. S., and R. A. Setty. 1993. Effect of nitrogen, ferrous sulphate and ZnSO4 on groundnut yield in deep black soils'. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38:329-330). The effectiveness of various synthetic and natural chelates has been widely investigated (Alvarez, J. M., D.Gonzalez. 2006. Zinc transformations in neutral soil and Zn efficiency in maize fertilization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54:9488-9495; Gonzalez, D., Obrador, A. Alvarez, J. M. 2007. Behaviour of zinc from six organic fertilizers applied to a navy bean crop grown in a calcareous soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55:7084-7092; Prasad, B., Sinha, M. K. 1981. The relative efficiency of Zn carriers on growth and Zn nutrition of corn. Plant and Soil 62:45-52). Apart from their effectiveness, application of chelates is generally expensive and may result in potential leaching risk because the more mobile the chelate, or the less biodegradable the carrier, the greater the risk of leaching (Gonzalez, D., A. Obrador., Alvarez, J. M. 2007. Behaviour of Zn from six organic fertilizers applied to a navy bean crop grown in a calcareous soil.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55:7084-7092). ZnSO4 which is highly soluble can easily be taken up by plants but is known to fall off quickly. The retention time in the plant system is low. Besides poor bioavailability of ZnSO4 nutrients for long periods, with the increased sensitivity of the plants and the surrounding adverse weather conditions like high temperatures, ZnSO4 having high salt index may create scorching effect on the plants. Moreover, the Zn content in the mixture is usually very low (9-12%). Our invention suggests that ZnO in the nanoscale form is absorbed by plants to a larger extent unlike bulk ZnSO4. These particles proved effective in enhancing plant growth, development and yield. A lower dose of foliar application is proved to be significantly productive. The post harvest leaf and kernel samples analysis (Table 7) revealed a significant increment in Zn content in leaves (42%, 29%) and kernels (42%, 36.6%) when supplied with nanoscale ZnO compared to chelated ZnSO4 (in Rabi 2009 and Rabi 2010, respectively). It is reported that nanoscale nutrients at high concentrations are as detrimental as the bulk nutrients. Similar results were observed by Racuciu and Creanga (Racuciu, M., D. Creanga. 2007. TMA-OH coated magnetic nanoparticles internalized in vegetal tissues. Romanian Journal of Physics 52:395-402), when they analyzed the influence of magnetic nanoparticles coated with tetramethylammonium hydroxide on the growth of Zea mays plant in early ontogenetic stages. Small concentrations of aqueous ferrofluid added in culture medium had a stimulating effect on the growth of plantlets while higher concentrations of aqueous ferrofluid induced an inhibitory effect.

[045] The mechanism of foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water-' suspended nanoparticles was well discussed by Thomas Eichert et a/., 2008 (Eichert, T., Kurtz, A., Steiner, U., Goldbach, H. E. 2008. Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water suspended nanoparticles. Physiologia Plantarum 134:151-160) in the context of Allium porrum and Vicia faba (L). The results suggest that the stomatal pathway differ fundamentally from the cuticular foliar uptake pathway. Low penetration rates in thick leaves, rapid drying of spray solution, limited translocation within the plant, and leaf damage are the problems of concern (Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of Higher / plants. 2nd ed, London:Academic Press) and most foliar applied micronutrients are not efficiently transported towards the roots.

Concentrated liquid suspensions of ZnO are used for foliar application but their performance is strongly determined by the size range specification of the ZnO particles present in the formulation (Moran, K. 2004. Micronutrient product types and their development proceedings, International Fertilizer Society (York, UK) 545:1-24). Leaf water repellency of adaxial or abaxial surface is a main limiting factor which can affect the Zn uptake through spray application processes (Watanabe, T., I. Yamaguchi. 1991. Evaluation of wettability of plant leaf surfaces.

Journal of Pesticide Science 16:491-498; Holder, C. D. 2007. Leaf water repellency of species in Guatemala and Colorado (USA) and its significance to forest hydrology studies. Journal of Hydrology 336:147-154). The permeability of the cuticle to water and to lypophilic organic molecules increases with mobility (distribution coefficients) and solubility (partition coefficients) of these compounds within the transport-limiting barrier of the cuticles. Ions being highly water soluble might have some hindrance in penetrating the lypophilic cuticle. This may be acting as a limiting factor in the case of chelated ZnSCv But our custom made nanoscale ZnO, which is having less hydrophilicity and being more dispersible in lypophilic substances compared to the ions, can penetrate through the leaf surface (Da Silva, L. C, M. A. Oliva., A. A. Azevedo., M. J. De Araujo. 2006. Response of resting plant species to pollution from an iron pelletisation factory. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 175:241-256) compared to ZnSO4. Also the mobility of the nanoparticles is known to be very high which ensures the phloem transport and ensures the nutrient to reach all parts of the plant. The presence of nanoparticles both in the extracellular space and within some cells in the living plant Cucurbita pepo was reported (Gonzalez-Melendi, P., R. Fernandez Pacheco., M. J./ Coronado., E. Corredor., P. S. Testillano., M. C. Risueno., C. Marquina., M. R. Ibarra., D. Rubiales., A. Perez-De-Luque. 2008. Nanoparticles as smart treatment-delivery systems in plants: assessment of different techniques of microscopy for their visualization in plant tissues. Annals of Botany 101:187-195). The increase in bioavailability of the nanoparticle may be because of its size and lower water solubility (which inhibits rapid falling-off compared to ionic supplements) compared to chelated ZnSO4. The inherent small size and the associated large surface area of nanoscale ZnO fertilizer may increase the uptake as reported earlier. This enhanced uptake of Zn / was seen in the EDAX analysis of the seeds also. All these factors may be responsible to give higher yields for nanoscale ZnO compared to chelated ZnSO4.

[046] Based on application needs, the properties of nanoparticles can be fine tuned or engineered for its synthesis, size, shape, surface functionalisation and so on. The results presented in this invention used a specific kind of nanoparticle namely, ZnO, a method for its synthesis and applications thereof in agriculture.

CLAIMS:

What is claimed is:

1. The application of nanoscale ZnO particles of size up to 25 nm in agriculture for improving productivity and to correct the zinc deficiency wherein the said material synthesis involving the following steps:

(a) preparation of zinc oxalate from solutions of zinc acetate and oxalic acid or a combination thereof
(b) decomposition of the zinc oxalate at a temperature range of 300-600 °C
(c) suspending the nanoparticles in water as a liquid suspension

2. The nanoparticles of claim 1, wherein the the size of the nanoparticles can be tuned up to 100 nm.

3. Nanoscale ZnO particles as explained in claim 1 used as the vehicle for supplying Zn to crops taking peanut as the model crop by seed treatment and or foliar applications.

4. The nanoparticles of claim 1, can be either be used alone or in combination with other nutrients such as N, P, K or micronutrients such as copper, iron, manganese, boron and molybdenum.

5. The nanoscale ZnO particles for applications as in claim 1, can be prepared by other methods such as high-energy ball milling, chemical reduction of Zn precursors, polyol synthesis, seed-mediate method, template methods, hydrothermal synthesis or various electrochemical routes.

6. The application of nanoscale ZnO particle as in claim 1, by methods such as seed treatment, foliar spray and soil application.

7. The nanoscale ZnO as mentioned claim 1, prepared with various salts, ions, molecules such that it becomes part of a fertilizer.

8. The nanoscale ZnO particle as claimed in claim 1, wherein said active material is preserved in solid state or in the form of a concentrate and is diluted during or upon application.

9. The use of nanoscale ZnO as claimed in claims 1-8, for crops such as rice, maize, sorghum, bajra, citrus, banana, mango, groundnut, wheat, ragi, sesamum, greengram, blackgram, sugarcane, chillies, bean, grape, guar, onion, pineapple, potato, tomato, cotton, rose, and all leafy vegetables.

10. Use of nanoscale ZnO as in claim1-8, for applications in various stages of plant growth such as seed treatment or foliar spray at seedling stage, before flowering and before pod/fruit formation.

11.The use of other nanoscale materials such as copper, iron, manganese, boron, and molybdenum as micronurients individually or collectively with ZnO nanoparticles as in the form of mixed oxide, core-shell material or embedded in a suitable matrix, for enhancing crop yield.

12.The ZnO particles used for agricultural applications are produced during use by mixing suitable Zn precursors.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 3586-CHE-2011 POWER OF ATTORNEY 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
2 3586-CHE-2011 FORM-5 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
3 3586-CHE-2011 FORM-3 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
4 3586-CHE-2011 FORM-2 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
5 3586-CHE-2011 FORM-18 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
6 3586-CHE-2011 FORM-1 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
7 3586-CHE-2011 DRAWINGS 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
8 3586-CHE-2011 DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE) 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
9 3586-CHE-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
10 3586-CHE-2011 CLAIMS 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
11 3586-CHE-2011 ABSTRACT 19-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-19
12 Form 26 [01-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-01
13 3586-CHE-2011-FER.pdf 2017-05-17
14 3586-CHE-2011-OTHERS [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
15 3586-CHE-2011-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
16 3586-CHE-2011-FER_SER_REPLY [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
17 3586-CHE-2011-DRAWING [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
18 3586-CHE-2011-CORRESPONDENCE [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
19 3586-CHE-2011-CLAIMS [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
20 3586-CHE-2011-AMMENDED DOCUMENTS [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
21 3586-CHE-2011-Amendment Of Application Before Grant - Form 13 [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
22 3586-CHE-2011-ABSTRACT [17-11-2017(online)].pdf 2017-11-17
23 3586-CHE-2011-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2018-07-04
24 3586-CHE-2011-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [17-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-17
25 3586-CHE-2011-Annexure (Optional) [17-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-17
26 3586-CHE-2011-Response to office action (Mandatory) [02-11-2018(online)].pdf 2018-11-02
27 3586-CHE-2011-Annexure (Optional) [02-11-2018(online)].pdf 2018-11-02
28 Marked Up Claims_Granted 304588_18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
29 Drawings_Granted 304588_18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
30 Description_Granted 304588_18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
31 Claims_Granted 304588_18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
32 Abstract_Granted 304588_18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
33 3586-CHE-2011-PatentCertificate18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
34 3586-CHE-2011-IntimationOfGrant18-12-2018.pdf 2018-12-18
35 Form27_license_01-04-2019.pdf 2019-04-01
36 3586-CHE-2011-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [04-04-2019(online)].pdf 2019-04-04
37 3586-CHE-2011-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [20-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-20
38 3586-CHE-2011-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [30-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-30
39 3586-che-2011-OTHERS [18-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-18
40 3586-che-2011-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [18-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-18
41 3586-CHE-2011-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [12-10-2022(online)].pdf 2022-10-12
42 3586-CHE-2011-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [05-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-05
43 3586-CHE-2011-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [25-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-25
44 3586-CHE-2011-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [11-10-2024(online)].pdf 2024-10-11
45 3586-CHE-2011-EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION(S) [10-10-2025(online)].pdf 2025-10-10

Search Strategy

1 3586che2011searchpdf_21-03-2017.pdf
2 3586che2011searchpdf_05-04-2017.pdf

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2013 - To 19/10/2014

4th: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2014 - To 19/10/2015

5th: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2015 - To 19/10/2016

6th: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2016 - To 19/10/2017

7th: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2017 - To 19/10/2018

8th: 15 Mar 2019

From 19/10/2018 - To 19/10/2019

9th: 31 Jul 2019

From 19/10/2019 - To 19/10/2020

10th: 14 Oct 2020

From 19/10/2020 - To 19/10/2021

11th: 18 Oct 2021

From 19/10/2021 - To 19/10/2022

12th: 12 Oct 2022

From 19/10/2022 - To 19/10/2023

13th: 05 Sep 2023

From 19/10/2023 - To 19/10/2024

14th: 11 Oct 2024

From 19/10/2024 - To 19/10/2025

15th: 10 Oct 2025

From 19/10/2025 - To 19/10/2026