FORM 2
THE PATENTS ACT 1970
[39 OF 1970]
&
THE PATENTS RULES, 2003
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
[See section 10; rule 13]
Title: “CARBON NANOTUBE ARRAY FOR FOCUSED FIELD EMISSION”
Address of the Applicant:
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, Bangalore 560 012, Karnataka, India.
Nationality: Indian
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
The following specification particularly describes the invention and the manner in which
it is to be performed.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
2
TECHNICAL FIELD
This application relates generally to a carbon nanotube array for focused field
emissions.
BACKGROUND
[0001] Miniaturized products have become increasingly dominant in the medical
field. The benefits of having smaller components include ease of movement, reduced
packaging and shipping costs, reduced power consumption, and fewer problems with
thermal distortion and vibration. In light of these advantages, miniaturization of systems
and devices has become an active area of research. In the past decade, enormous
progress has been made in developing new fabrication techniques and materials for
developing smaller biomedical devices. One promising area of research that could
provide for substantial miniaturization of devices involves the use of carbon nanotubes.
[0002] Carbon nanotubes exhibit impressive structural, mechanical, and electronic
properties in a small package, including higher strength and higher electrical and thermal
conductivity. Carbon nanotubes are essentially hexagonal networks of carbon atoms and
can be thought of as a layer of graphite rolled up into a cylindrical shape.
[0003] Techniques being used for producing carbon nanotubes include 1) a carbon
arc-discharge technique, 2) a laser-ablation technique, 3) a chemical vapor deposition
(CVD) technique, and 4) a high pressure carbon monoxide technique.
[0004] Before the advent of carbon nanotubes, the traditional method of generating xrays
comprised the use of a metallic filament (cathode) that acts as a source of electrons
when heated to a very high temperature. Electrons emitted from the heated filament are
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
3
then bombarded against a metal target (anode) to generate x-rays.
[0005] Research has reported, however, that field emission may be a better
mechanism of extracting electrons compared to thermoionic emission. In field emission,
the electrons are emitted at room temperature and the output current is voltage
controllable. In addition, the voltage necessary for electron emission is lowered.
SUMMARY
[0006] In accordance with one embodiment, a field emission device includes a
cathode, the cathode having a substrate and an array of carbon nanotubes arranged over
the substrate in a variable height distribution wherein the variable height distribution
progresses from an edge to a center of the distribution. The variable height distribution
has a linear progression from an edge to a center of the distribution. The field emission
device may also include a side gate arranged adjacent the array in a partially overlapping
manner such that at least a portion of the side gate exists in a same plane as at least a
portion of the array of carbon nanotubes. The side gate may circumferentially surround
the array of carbon nanotubes. For use in an x-ray imager or dosing device, the field
emission device may further include an x-ray plate disposed over the cathode and array of
carbon nanotubes. The x-ray plate may be formed of a material that, when struck by
electrons emitted from the array of carbon nanotubes, produces x-rays.
[0007] In another embodiment, an imaging device may include an array of pixels,
each pixel including a field emission device, and each field emission device including a
cathode, the cathode having a substrate and an array of carbon nanotubes arranged over
the substrate in a variable height distribution.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
4
[0008] In a further embodiment, a method of focusing field emission in a field
emission device includes supplying a voltage across an array of carbon nanotubes
arranged over a cathode substrate, wherein the array is configured to have a pointed
height distribution wherein the variable height distribution progresses from an edge to a
center of the distribution.
[0009] In another embodiment, a method of focusing field emission in a field
emission device includes supplying a voltage across an array of carbon nanotubes
arranged over a cathode substrate, wherein the array of carbon nanotubes is configured
such that an average height of carbon nanotubes increases from a circumferential position
of the cathode substrate to a central position of the cathode substrate, with a maximum
average height of carbon nanotubes occurring at substantially a center of the cathode
substrate.
[0010] The foregoing summary is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any
way limiting. In addition to the illustrative aspects, embodiments, and features described
above, further aspects, embodiments, and features will become apparent by reference to
the drawings and the following detailed description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0011] Fig. 1 is a perspective view of an x-ray emitting source device including a
field emitter according to one embodiment of the disclosure.
[0012] Fig. 2 is a perspective view of an x-ray emitting source device including a
field emitter according to another embodiment of the disclosure.
[0013] Fig. 3 a contour plot showing the concentration of the electric field
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
5
surrounding the carbon nanotube tips arrayed as in the embodiment of Fig. 1.
[0014] Fig. 4 is a plot illustrating simulated field emission current histories for
varying diameters of carbon nanotubes under a DC voltage of 650V.
[0015] Fig. 5 is a plot illustrating simulated field emission current histories for
varying spacing between neighboring carbon nanotubes under a DC voltage of 650V.
[0016] Fig. 6(a) is a simulated plot of initial and deflected shape of an array of
carbon nanotubes at t = 50s of field emission for a height distribution according to an
example embodiment of the invention.
[0017] Fig. 6(b) is a simulated plot of initial and deflected shape of an array of
carbon nanotubes at t = 50s of field emission for a random height distribution of a
comparative example.
[0018] Fig. 7(a) is a plot illustrating simulated tip deflection angles of carbon
nanotubes in an array of 100 carbon nanotubes at t = 50s of field emission for a height
distribution according to an example embodiment of the disclosure.
[0019] Fig. 7(b) is a plot illustrating simulated tip deflection angles of carbon
nanotubes in an array of 100 carbon nanotubes at t = 50s of field emission for a random
configurations of a comparative example.
[0020] Fig. 8 is a plot illustrating the effect of a side gate on the electrical potential
on the nanotubes near the edge of the array.
[0021] Fig. 9(a) is a plot illustrating simulated time history of field emission current
density for an array of 100 CNTs at t = 50s of field emission for a pointed shape height
distribution according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
[0022] Fig. 9(b) is a plot illustrating simulated time history of field emission current
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
6
density for an array of 100 CNTs at t = 50s of field emission for a random height
distribution of a comparative example.
[0023] Fig. 10 is a plot illustrating simulated distribution of current density over the
tips of the carbon nanotubes in both the pointed shape height distribution array and the
random distribution array at t = 50s.
[0024] Fig. 11(a) is a plot illustrating simulated maximum temperatures at the tips of
the carbon nanotubes for an array of 100 CNTs at t = 50s of field emission for a pointed
shape height distribution according to an embodiment of the disclosure.
[0025] Fig. 11(b) is a plot illustrating simulated maximum temperatures at the tips of
the carbon nanotubes for an array of 100 CNTs at t = 50s of field emission for a random
height distribution of a comparative example.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying
drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify
similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments
described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting.
Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing
from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here. It will be readily understood
that the aspects of the present disclosure, as generally described herein, and illustrated in
the Figures, can be arranged, substituted, combined, and designed in a wide variety of
different configurations, all of which are explicitly contemplated and make part of this
disclosure.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
7
[0027] Fig. 1 illustrates an x-ray generation source 100 as a single pixel according to
one embodiment. Carbon nanotubes grown on substrates may be used as electron sources
in field emission applications. Carbon nanotube arrays can be grown on cathode
substrates and their collective dynamics utilized such that the total emission intensity of
the array is sufficiently high while the reduced load on each carbon nanotube can lead to
longer operational life of the imaging device. Such arrays can advantageously be used in
forming nano-scale x-ray imaging and/or x-ray delivery devices, of which an x-ray
generation source is a critical element. X-ray imaging devices include, for example,
skeletal imagers for imaging bone structures of mammals. X-ray delivery devices
include, for example, targeted radiation therapy devices used as part of a cancer treatment
plan to control further growth of malignant cells.
[0028] As shown in Fig. 1, the x-ray generation source 100 may include a cathode
substrate 2, a carbon nanotube array 4 of carbon nanotubes 6, an anode 8, a side-gate 12,
and an optional insulating layer 14 between the substrate 2 and the side gate 12.
Although Fig. 1 shows a single pixel comprised of a single x-ray generation source 100,
an x-ray generation source in practice may include a plurality of pixels in a one, two, or
three-dimensional array.
[0029] The cathode substrate 2 of the x-ray generation source 100 supports the
cathode array 4 and provides a growth surface for the carbon nanotubes 6. Substrate
materials onto which carbon nanotubes 6 can be grown include, for example, aluminum,
copper, stainless steel, molybdenum, silicon, quartz, mica, or highly oriented pyrolytic
graphite (HOPG). Other materials can also be used. The cathode substrate 2 may be
cylindrically shaped as shown in Fig. 1, or may have any other shape, including for
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
8
example, square or polynomial. The cathode substrate material may also provide rigid
support for the cathode nanotube array 4.
[0030] The cathode nanotube array 4 is formed over the cathode substrate 2. While
Fig. 1 illustrates the carbon nanotubes 6 being formed directly on the substrate 2, one or
more layers could be formed between the substrate 2 and the cathode nanotube array 4.
The carbon nanotubes 6 forming the array can be grown as single-wall nanotubes
(SWNTs) or multi-wall nanotubes (MWNTs).
[0031] Most SWNTs have a diameter of close to 1 nanometer, with a tube length that
can be many thousands of times longer. The structure of a SWNT can be conceptualized
by wrapping a one-atom-thick layer of graphite called graphene into a seamless cylinder.
[0032] MWNTs consist of multiple layers of graphite rolled in on themselves to form
a tube shape. The MWNT can be formed in two ways. In a first model, sheets of
graphite are arranged in concentric cylinders, e.g., a SWNT within a larger SWNT
nanotube. In a second model, a single sheet of graphite is rolled in around itself,
resembling a rolled newspaper. The interlayer distance in multi-walled nanotubes is
close to the distance between graphene layers in graphite, approximately 3.3 Å (330 pm).
[0033] The carbon nanotubes 6 could be uniformly oriented or randomly oriented,
although a uniform orientation is preferred. Any number of carbon nanotube growth
processes can be used to form the nanotube array, including, for example, laser ablation,
arc discharge, or chemical vapor deposition. Other growth processes could also be used.
The carbon nanotubes 6 could have an armchair structure, a zigzag structure, a chiral
structure, or any other structure.
[0034] The carbon nanotubes 6 may also have atomic defects or doping by one or
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
9
more different atomic species. For example, the carbon nanotubes 6 may be doped with
boron, boron nitride, copper, molybdenum, or cobalt. The doping of the carbon
nanotubes 6 may provide for enhanced electron emission efficiency. All the carbon
nanotubes 6 may be doped with a similar impurity at a similar dose, or the doping and/or
impurity may vary across the array 4 of carbon nanotubes 6.
[0035] The anode 8 is offset axially a distance d from the cathode substrate 2. The
anode 8 may be formed of a conductive metal, such as copper. An electric field is
formed between the cathode substrate 2 and the anode 8 by application of a voltage V0
between the anode 8 and the cathode substrate 2.
[0036] The electrons flow best when the nanotubes are placed vertically on the
cathode substrate and then a potential difference is applied between the bottom edge of
the tube and the anode which at some distance ahead of the other end of the tube (tip of
the tube). Between the anode and the other end of the tube, the free space enhances the
ejection of the electrons ballistically from the tube tip.
[0037] The applied electric field accelerates the electrons emitted from the carbon
nanotube array 4 in an axial direction towards the anode 8. Other anode materials and
structures could also be used. For example, the anode 8 may be formed as a mesh
structure.
[0038] In certain applications, an x-ray plate (not shown) may be formed above the
anode 8 and of a material that, when impacted by the electrons emitted from the carbon
nanotube array 4 and accelerated by the anode 8, produces x-rays. For example, copper
(Cu) or molybdenum (Mo) could be used. Other materials could also be used. The x-ray
plate may be angled off-axis in order to direct x-rays produced by the x-ray plate in an
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
10
angular direction offset from the axial direction in which the cathode substrate 2 and
anode 8 are arranged.
[0039] Fig. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of the x-ray source generator 200.
As shown in the exploded-view of Fig. 2, the nanotube array 4 may be housed in a sealed
container closed off by the side-gate 12 and beryllium (Be) thin film window 22 in order
to maintain a vacuum for improved operation of the x-ray source generator 200. For
example, a vacuum in the range of from 10-3 to 10-9 bar could be used. The beryllium
(Be) thin film window 22 may be provided at an upper-most surface of the sealed
container to allow the generated x-rays to pass through, while maintaining the inside of
the container in a vacuum state.
[0040] An additional MEMS-based beam control mechanism may also be included in
the x-ray source generator 200. The MEMS-based beam control mechanism may include
a first segmented side gate for beam control 24 formed over the side gate 12, metal
electrodes 26 providing individual control to the segmented side gate 24, an insulation
layer 28, and a second side gate for beam control 30 that may or may not be segmented.
An additional insulating layer (not shown) may be formed to insulate the electrodes 26
from the underlying side gate 12. Alternatively, the need for an additional insulating
layer could be eliminated by utilizing wide band gap semiconductors and metals.
[0041] The segmented side gate for beam control 24 can be utilized to homogenize
the electron emissions from the nanotube array 4. The segmentation of the beam control
24 allows for precise control and re-direction of electrons emitted from the nanotube
array 4. For example, in one instance, each one of the segments comprising the
segmented beam control 24 could be provided a substantially similar voltage potential to
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
11
center the electron emission through the beryllium window. Alternatively, due to a
particular orientation of the nanotube array 4, or perhaps due to defects in the formation
of the nanotube array, electron emissions tending to a particular quadrant may be redirected.
For example, electron emissions tending towards the ordinal north-east
quadrant of the area within the segmented beam control 24 may be re-directed towards a
center location by energizing the segments 32 and 34 in the north-east quadrant of the
segmented beam control 24 at a higher voltage potential than the remaining segments in
the segmented beam control 24.
[0042] Logic to control the segments of the segmented beam control 24 could be
provided at each x-ray source generator 200, or could be placed at a peripheral location of
an array of x-ray source generators, or even at an off-chip location. The logic may
comprise hard-coded voltage potential application values determined at the time of
manufacture or some time thereafter, or may comprise variable voltage potentials that
may vary with respect to a detected location of the electron emissions, or may comprise a
manually adjusted value adjusted by an operator of the device.
[0043] In addition to the segmented beam control 24, an additional segmented or
non-segmented beam control ring 30 may be provided over the segmented beam control
24. The segmented beam control 24 is generally positioned so as to be in a same or
proximate vertical plane as the maximum height of the nanotube array 4. In contrast, the
additional beam control ring 30 is displaced in a direction of travel of the electron
emissions at predetermined distance so as to provide an additional level of beam control
prior to emission of the generated electrons through the beryllium window 22. Although
not shown in Fig. 2, additional metal wiring(s) may be disposed in order to provide one
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
12
or more voltage potentials to the additional beam control ring 30.
[0044] It is important to note that although the elements of Fig. 2 are shown generally
having a circular shape, any other shape could be used, including, for example, a
polygonal shape. Furthermore, the segmented beam control 24 could be formed by, for
example, a masking and etching process, by a lithography process, or by a selective
deposition process. Other processes could also be used.
[0045] The general method of producing electrons in the nanotube array 4 of either xray
source generator 100 of Fig. 1 or x-ray source generator 200 of Fig. 2 does not
substantially differ. Upon application of a voltage between the cathode substrate 2 and
anode 8, the carbon nanotubes 6 begin to emit electrons, which are accelerated towards
the anode 8 due to the direction of the applied electrical field between the anode 8 and the
cathode 2.
[0046] The background electric field can be defined as E = -V0/d, where V0 = Vd - Vs
is the applied bias voltage, Vs is the constant source potential on the substrate side, Vd is
the drain potential on the anode side and d, as before, is the clearance between the
electrodes. The total electrostatic energy consists of a linear drop due to the uniform
background electric field and the potential energy due to the charges on the carbon
nanotubes. Therefore, the total electrostatic energy can be expressed as
( , ) ( ) G(i, j)(nˆ n)
d
x z eV e V V z
j
s d s j ν = − − − + Σ −
[0047] where e is the positive electronic charge, G(i, j) is the Green's function with i
indicating the ring position and j nˆ describing the electron density at node position j on
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
13
the ring. In the present case, while computing the Green's function, the nodal charges of
the neighboring carbon nanotubes can also be considered. This essentially introduces
non-local contributions due to the carbon nanotube distribution in the film. The total
electric field E(z) = - ∇ ν(z)/e can be expressed as:
dz
d z
e
Ez
1 ν ( )
= −
[0048] The current density ( J ) due to field emission is obtained by using the Fowler-
Nordheim (FN) equation:
⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎣
⎡ Φ
−
Φ
=
z
z
E
J BE C
2 3 / 2
exp
[0049] where Φ is the work function of the carbon nanotube, and B and C are
constants. Computation is performed at every time step, followed by update of the
geometry of the carbon nanotubes. As a result, the charge distribution among the carbon
nanotubes also changes.
[0050] The field emission current (Icell) from the anode surface corresponding to an
elemental volume V, of the film of cathode substrate including carbon nanotubes and free
space atop can then be obtained as:
Σ=
=
N
j
cell cell j I A J
1
[0051] where Acell is the anode surface area and N is the number of carbon nanotubes
in the volume element. The total current is obtained by summing the cell-wise current
(Icell). This formulation takes into account the effect of carbon nanotube tip orientations.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
14
[0052] Once the electrons are accelerated by the above-defined electric field and pass
the anode 8, they impact the x-ray plate 10. The impact of the electrons on the material
of the x-ray plate 10 causes x-rays to be emitted in a corresponding angle based, at least
in part, on the impact angle of the electron and the tilt angle of the x-ray plate 10.
Alternatively, or in addition, a crystal structure orientation of the x-ray plate 10 could be
utilized to provide the angled emission of x-rays from the x-ray plate.
[0053] By arranging the carbon nanotubes 6 of the array 4 in a variable height
distribution, as shown in either Fig. 1 or Fig. 2, a more focused beam of electrons is
formed, and as a result, a more focused beam of x-rays is output. As shown in Fig. 1, an
embodiment of variable height distribution includes a pointed height distribution where
the average height of the carbon nanotubes 6 increases from a circumferential position
“A” of the cathode substrate 2 to a central position “B” of the cathode substrate 2, with a
maximum average carbon nanotube height at approximately the center position “B” of
the cathode substrate 2. In such a pointed height distribution, the maximum average
carbon nanotube height occurs substantially at the center of the array of nanotubes.
While Fig. 1 shows a linear progression from the circumferential position to the center
position, other progressions could be used, for example, parabolic or logarithmic. In any
event, the distribution is preferably symmetric across a center region of the array.
[0054] Additionally, while Fig. 1 shows a single row of uniform carbon nanotubes 6,
other arrangements may provide the same or similar benefits. For example, a twodimensional
array of carbon nanotubes 6 may be provided as shown in Fig. 2. A twodimensional
array of carbon nanotubes could take a pyramidal shape or a cone shape
consistent with the requirement of a pointed height distribution. Similarly, although a
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
15
generally linear progression is shown in Fig. 2, a non-linear progression could also be
used including, for example, parabolic or logarithmic. Independent of the progression
used in the 2-D array, preferably a maximum height of the array occurs at substantially a
center of the 2-D array.
[0055] For either the one-dimensional of Fig. 1 or two-dimensional array of Fig. 2, a
side-gate 12 may be disposed surrounding the nanotube array 4 in order to provide
increased control over electron emission and focusing. As shown more clearly in Fig. 1,
the side-gate 12 may be arranged in a same horizontal plane Pcna as the carbon nanotube
array 4. Although Fig. 1 shows the entire height hsg of the side-gate 12 overlapping the
horizontal plane Pcna defined by the carbon nanotube array 4, such a relationship is not
required. For example, only a portion of a horizontal plane Psg defined by the height of
the side-gate 12 need overlap a portion of the horizontal plane Pcna defined by the height
of the carbon nanotube array 4.
[0056] The side-gate 12 could be electrically shorted to the cathode substrate 2, or
could be separated from the cathode substrate 2 via an intervening insulating layer 14.
By providing an intervening insulating layer 14, a separate voltage difference Vgate could
be applied to the side-gate 12 in order to provide increased control over electron emission
and focusing in the x-ray generation source 100.
[0057] As shown in Fig. 2, the side-gate 12 could circumferentially surround the
carbon nanotube array 4. This could be accomplished by, for example, etching a grove
36 in a side gate layer and growing and/or depositing the nanotube array 4 in the formed
grove 36. Alternatively, one or more stand-alone side-gate elements could be provided at
discrete locations around the periphery of the carbon nanotube array 4.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
16
[0058] Fig. 3 shows the transverse electric field distribution (Ez) 42 in the x-ray
generation source of Fig. 1 with the side-gate 12 shorted to the cathode substrate 2 and
with an application of a voltage V0 of approximately 650 V between the anode 8 and
cathode substrate 2. The distance h is the distance from the cathode substrate 2 to a peak
height of a central carbon nanotube 6. The distance d is the distance from the cathode
substrate 2 to a top of the side-gate 12. As can be seen in Fig. 3, the electric field
generated is concentrated near the carbon nanotube tips under symmetric lateral force
fields.
[0059] Several simulations were conducted utilizing a variable height distribution of
the carbon nanotube array 4. During the simulations, the distance between the cathode
substrate 2 and the anode surface 8 was taken as 34.7 μm. The height of the side-gate 12
was 6 μm, while the spacing between neighboring carbon nanotubes 6 in the array 4 was
selected as 2 μm. A DC bias voltage V0 of 650V was applied across the cathode
substrate 2 and anode 8. Carbon nanotube 6 diameters and spacing, which effect carbon
nanotube field emitter characteristics, were kept constant across these simulations.
[0060] Figs. 4 and 5 illustrate how diameter and spacing could affect field emission
characteristics of the carbon nanotube array 4. Figs. 4 and 5 specifically illustrate field
emission current histories for two different parametric variations: diameter and spacing
between carbon nanotubes 6 at the cathode substrate 2. In the first case, the spacing
between neighboring carbon nanotubes 6 was kept constant, while the diameter was
varied. The current histories for different values of diameters are shown in Fig. 4. As
evident from the figure, the output current is low at large diameter values. This is due to
the fact that current amplification is less with large diameter of carbon nanotubes 6
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
17
compared to small diameter carbon nanotubes.
[0061] In the second case, the diameter was kept constant, while the spacing between
neighboring carbon nanotubes 6 was varied among 1 μm, 2 μm, 3 μm, 4 μm and 5 μm.
The current histories for all these cases are shown in Fig. 5. The trends in five curves in
Fig. 5 demonstrate that the current in all cases decreases initially and then becomes
constant afterward and that as the spacing between neighboring carbon nanotubes
increases, the output current increases. The results of Figs. 4 and 5 can also be applied to
the carbon nanotubes of the pointed height array, to obtain the desired current-voltage
characteristics for a particular application by selectively choosing carbon nanotube
diameters and spacing.
[0062] Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) compare the deformation of carbon nanotubes in the
pointed height distribution array configuration and the random height distribution array
configuration. The solid lines illustrate an initial position and the dashed lines a final
position approximately 50s later. Fig. 6(a) illustrates the case where the carbon
nanotubes are arranged in a pointed height distribution with heights varying from 6 μm at
the edges to 12 μm at the center. Fig. 6(b) illustrates the case where the carbon nanotubes
6 are arranged in a randomly distributed array with heights varying as h = (h0 ± 2μm) ±
2μm × rand(1). Here the function rand denotes random number generator.
[0063] The deformation of carbon nanotubes during field emission is a combined
effect of various electromechanical forces in a slow time scale and the fluctuation of the
carbon nanotube sheet due to electron-phonon interaction in a fast time scale. Therefore,
the total displacement utotal can be expressed as:
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
18
u u(1) u(2) total = +
where u(1) and u(2) are the displacements due to electromechanical forces and fluctuation
of carbon nanotube sheets due to electron-phonon interaction, respectively.
[0064] In light of the forgoing, monitoring the deflection of carbon nanotube tips
provides an indication of the current-voltage response of the carbon nanotube array 4. As
shown in Fig. 6(a), the initial and final positions of the carbon nanotubes in the pointed
height distribution marked by the dashed lines and the red lines are substantially the
same, indicating little to no deflection of carbon nanotube tips. In comparison, the initial
and final positions of the carbon nanotubes in the random height distribution marked by
the dashed and solid lines of Fig. 6(b) indicate substantially more deflections.
Accordingly, the pointed height distribution provides an improved, stabilized currentvoltage
response over the random height distribution, indicating improved electron flow
efficiencies over the random height distribution.
[0065] Figs. 7(a) and 7(b) illustrate carbon nanotube deflection angles for a pointed
height distribution and a random distribution, respectfully. Each distribution was
provided with random initial deflection angles. The dashed lines illustrate an initial
deflection angle and the red lines illustrate a final deflection angle after a time period of
approximately 50 s.
[0066] The strong influence of lateral force field can be clearly seen in Figs. 7(a) and
7(b). Such force field produces electrodynamic repulsion such that the resultant force
imbalance on the carbon nanotubes toward the edges of the array eventually destabilizes
the orientation of the carbon nanotube tips in Fig. 7(b). In the pointed height distribution
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
19
arrangement of Fig. 7(a), this force imbalance is minimized due to gradual reduction in
the carbon nanotube heights, and as a result, a lesser magnitude of deflections is
observed. Also, the lateral electrodynamic forces produce instabilities in the randomly
distributed array where the electrons are pulled up by the anode and the carbon nanotube
tips experience a significant elongation as shown in Fig. 7(b).
[0067] Fig. 8 illustrates a result of implementing a side-gate 12, including a
comparison of electric potential along a nanotube 6 near the edge of the array 4 as
compared to a nanotube 6 near the middle of the array 4. The arrow indicates a drop in
the electric potential at the edge of the array 4, which is due to side gate alone. The drop
in electric potential at the edge of the array due to the side-gate 12 helps to stabilize field
emission and lateral deflection of nanotubes 6 at the edge of the array 4.
[0068] Figs. 9(a) and 9(b) compare the time histories of maximum, minimum and
average current densities out of the array for the case of a pointed height array and a
random height array, respectively. As can be seen by comparing the average current
density (solid line) of Figs. 9(a) and 9(b), the average current density for the case of
pointed height array is almost three times more than the average current density for the
random height array. This result clearly demonstrates the improvement achieved by
using a pointed height array 4 and a side gate 12. Beside a three fold increase in the
magnitude of average current density for the pointed array case in Fig. 9(a), the temporal
fluctuation is also insignificant as compared to Fig. 9(b), which indicates an improved
field emission while maintaining high stability.
[0069] Fig. 10 demonstrates the spatial distribution of emission current density in the
pointed height array as compared to the random distribution array. As shown in Fig. 10,
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
20
the current density in the pointed height array shows a stable emission and a focus
towards the middle of the array.
[0070] Figs. 11(a) and 11(b) show the temperature at the tip of each carbon nanotube
6 over an array of 100 carbon nanotubes for the pointed height distribution array and the
random distribution array, respectively. During the emission of the electrons, interactions
among several quantum states and acoustic-thermal phonon modes take place. As the
electrons become ballistic electrons in free space, the corresponding energy released to
the carbon nanotube cap region by the ejected electrons produces thermal transients. Fig.
11(a) shows a temperature rise of up to approximately 480 K at the center of the pointed
height distribution array. Additionally, the temperature distribution of the pointed height
distribution array shows a more or less gradual decrease towards the edges. On the other
hand, as seen in Fig. 11(b), the random height distribution array leads to a much stronger
electron-phonon interaction as the carbon nanotubes undergo large tip rotations. As a
result, the maximum temperature in the random distribution array is nearly 600K, and
temperatures above 500K occur at several disparate points along the array.
[0071] As can be seen by the forgoing, by arranging the carbon nanotubes in a
pointed height distribution array, and providing for a side-gate structure adjacent the
array, for example, an improved x-ray generation source at the nano-scale can be
provided.
[0072] The present disclosure is not to be limited in terms of the particular
embodiments described in this application, which are intended as illustrations of various
aspects. Many modifications and variations can be made without departing from its spirit
and scope, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Functionally equivalent methods
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
21
and apparatuses within the scope of the disclosure, in addition to those enumerated
herein, will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing descriptions. Such
modifications and variations are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The present disclosure is to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims, along
with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. It is to be understood
that this disclosure is not limited to particular methods, reagents, compounds,
compositions, or materials, which can, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the
terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only,
and is not intended to be limiting.
[0073] With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms
herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or
from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The
various singular/plural permutations may be expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
[0074] It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used
herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are
generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as
“including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at
least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.).
It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an
introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the
claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present.
[0075] For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may
contain usage of the introductory phrases "at least one" and "one or more" to introduce
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
22
claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that
the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles "a" or "an" limits any
particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to embodiments containing
only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases
"one or more" or "at least one" and indefinite articles such as "a" or "an" (e.g., “a” and/or
“an” should be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true
for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a
specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the
art will recognize that such recitation should be interpreted to mean at least the recited
number (e.g., the bare recitation of "two recitations," without other modifiers, means at
least two recitations, or two or more recitations).
[0076] Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one
of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one
having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “ a system having at least
one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B
alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C
together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B,
or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill
in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “ a system having at least one of A, B,
or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A
and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It
will be further understood by those within the art that virtually any disjunctive word
and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description,
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
23
claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including
one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms. For example, the phrase “A or B”
will be understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”
[0077] As will be understood by one skilled in the art, for any and all purposes, such
as in terms of providing a written description, all ranges disclosed herein also encompass
any and all possible subranges and combinations of subranges thereof. Any listed range
can be easily recognized as sufficiently describing and enabling the same range being
broken down into at least equal halves, thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, etc. As a nonlimiting
example, each range discussed herein can be readily broken down into a lower
third, middle third and upper third, etc. As will also be understood by one skilled in the
art all language such as “up to,” “at least,” “greater than,” “less than,” and the like
include the number recited and refer to ranges which can be subsequently broken down
into subranges as discussed above. Finally, as will be understood by one skilled in the
art, a range includes each individual member. Thus, for example, a group having 1-3
cells refers to groups having 1, 2, or 3 cells. Similarly, a group having 1-5 cells refers to
groups having 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cells, and so forth.
[0078] While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other
aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects
and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to
be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
24
We claim:
1. A field emission device comprising a cathode, the cathode comprised of a
substrate and an array of carbon nanotubes arranged over the substrate in a variable
height distribution, wherein the variable height distribution comprises a progression from
an edge to a center of the distribution; and
a segmented beam control mechanism formed over the substrate and comprised of
a plurality of beam control segments for varying a trajectory of electrons emitted from the
array of carbon nanotubes.
2. The device of claim 1, further comprising an insulating layer formed over the
segmented beam control mechanism and an additional side gate for beam control formed
over the insulating layer.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein the segmented beam control mechanism is
disposed so as to be in a same or substantially proximate vertical plane as a maximum
height of the array of carbon nanotubes.
4. The device of claim 1, further comprising at least one side gate arranged below
the segmented beam control mechanism and adjacent the array of carbon nanotubes in a
partially overlapping manner such that at least a portion of the side gate exists in a same
plane as at least a portion of the array of carbon nanotubes.
5. The device of claim 4, wherein the at least one side gate circumferentially
surrounds the array of carbon nanotubes.
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
25
6. The device of claim 1, further comprising an x-ray plate disposed over the
cathode, array of carbon nanotubes, and segmented beam control mechanism, wherein the
x-ray plate is comprised of a material that, when struck by electrons emitted from the
array of carbon nanotubes, produces x-rays.
7. An imaging device comprising an array of pixels, each pixel including a field
emission device and a segmented beam control mechanism, each field emission device
comprising a cathode, the cathode comprising a substrate and an array of carbon
nanotubes arranged over the substrate in a variable height distribution, wherein the
variable height distribution comprises a progression from an edge to a center of the
distribution; and
wherein each segmented beam control mechanism is formed over the substrate
and comprises a plurality of beam control segments for varying a trajectory of electrons
emitted from the corresponding field emission device.
8. The imaging device of claim 7, further comprising at least one side gate
arranged below the segmented beam control mechanism and adjacent the array in a
partially overlapping manner such that at least a portion of the side gate exists in a same
plane as at least a portion of the array of carbon nanotubes.
9. A method of focusing field emission in a field emission device comprising:
supplying a first voltage across an array of carbon nanotubes arranged over a cathode
substrate, wherein the array is configured to have a pointed height distribution; and
Attorney’s Docket No.: “MBHB # 09-221”
26
supplying at least a second and third voltage to corresponding segments of a
segmented beam-control mechanism disposed over the cathode substrate.
10. A method of focusing field emission in a field emission device comprising:
supplying a voltage across an array of carbon nanotubes arranged over a cathode
substrate, wherein the array of carbon nanotubes is configured such that an average
height of carbon nanotubes increases from a circumferential position of the cathode
substrate to a central position of the cathode substrate, with a maximum average height of
carbon nanotubes occurring at substantially a center of the cathode substrate; and
supplying at least a second and third voltage to corresponding segments of a
segmented beam-control mechanism disposed over the cathode substrate.
Dated this 17th day of August, 2009
Madhusudan S.T.
IN/PA-1297
Of K & S Partners
Agent for the Applicant