Description:FIELD OF INVENTION
My field of interest involves developing criteria for power system voltage stability through steady-state analysis. This includes evaluating the dynamics of generators and shunt compensators to ensure reliable voltage levels, enhance system robustness, and prevent collapse. I focus on creating models and simulations that optimize voltage stability for efficient and resilient power grid operations.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
The development of criteria for power system voltage stability through steady-state analysis addresses the critical need for maintaining voltage stability in increasingly complex power grids. As the demand for electricity grows and renewable energy sources become more prevalent, power systems face new challenges that can compromise voltage stability, potentially leading to voltage collapse and blackouts. Voltage stability concerns arise when a power system is unable to maintain acceptable voltage levels under normal operating conditions or after being subjected to disturbances. Traditional methods of ensuring voltage stability are becoming less effective due to the evolving nature of power systems. This necessitates the development of new criteria that can accurately assess and enhance voltage stability in modern power grids. Steady-state analysis offers a comprehensive approach to understanding voltage stability by examining the system's behavior under continuous operating conditions. This method allows for the evaluation of various factors, including the dynamics of generators, the behavior of shunt compensators, load characteristics, and the interaction between different components within the power grid. The invention aims to create robust models and simulations that provide insights into the conditions leading to voltage instability. By identifying critical thresholds and operational limits, the criteria developed can guide the design and implementation of control strategies to enhance voltage stability. This includes optimizing the placement and operation of shunt compensators, improving generator response, and developing adaptive load management techniques. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure a reliable and resilient power system capable of withstanding fluctuations in demand and integrating renewable energy sources. This will contribute to the stability and efficiency of modern power grids, thereby supporting the continuous and reliable delivery of electricity to consumers.
The patent application number 201947039940 discloses a method for preparing biodegradable microspheres having improved stability and storage stability.
The patent application number 202027028317 discloses a state analyzer system and state analysis device.
The patent application number 202147022777 discloses a state analysis of an electrical operating resource.
The patent application number 202117056067 discloses a high voltage transformer, method for producing a high voltage transformer and test system and test signal device comprising a high voltage transformer.
The patent application number 202247024483 discloses a start-up procedure for rapid attainment of optimal steady-state performance in membrane separation.
SUMMARY
The development of criteria for power system voltage stability through steady-state analysis focuses on ensuring the reliable operation of electrical power systems by preventing voltage collapse and maintaining stable voltage levels under various operating conditions. This invention involves analyzing the system's ability to maintain equilibrium between power supply and demand while considering the effects of load variations, system configuration, and generation dynamics.
Key elements of this invention include:
1. Steady-State Voltage Stability Assessment: Utilizing static approaches to evaluate the voltage stability of power systems under different loading scenarios. This involves calculating the power-voltage (P-V) and reactive power-voltage (Q-V) curves to determine the maximum loadability point and the stability margin.
2. Dynamic Load Modeling: Incorporating dynamic load models that account for the real-time behavior of loads, including their voltage and frequency sensitivity. This helps in accurately predicting the system's response to changes in load and identifying potential instability regions.
3. Generator Dynamics and Shunt Compensators: Analyzing the impact of generator excitation systems and shunt compensators (capacitors and reactors) on voltage stability. This includes studying how these components can enhance stability by providing reactive power support and regulating voltage levels.
4. Parameter Identification Methods: Employing component-based and measurement-based approaches to identify load model parameters. Component-based methods aggregate individual electrical components, while measurement-based approaches use data from devices like Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) and smart meters to derive model parameters through statistical and AI techniques.
5. Stability Criteria Development: Establishing quantitative criteria for voltage stability that can be used by system operators to make informed decisions regarding system operation, control actions, and contingency planning.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Power System Voltage Stability
At any given time, a power system's operating condition must be stable, meeting various operational criteria, and it should also be secure in the event of any credible contingency. Present-day power systems are being operated closer to their stability limits due to economic and environmental constraints, making the maintenance of a stable and secure operation a significant and challenging issue. Voltage instability has garnered considerable attention from power system researchers and planners in recent years and is regarded as one of the major sources of power system insecurity.
Voltage instability occurs when the receiving end voltage drops significantly below its normal value and does not recover, even after the activation of restoration mechanisms such as VAR compensators, or continues to oscillate due to inadequate damping against disturbances. Voltage collapse is the process by which voltage falls to an unacceptably low value due to a cascade of events associated with voltage instability. Initially linked with weak systems and long transmission lines, voltage problems now also affect highly developed networks due to increased loading.
The main factors causing voltage instability in power systems are now well understood. This chapter provides a brief introduction to the basic concepts of voltage stability and some conventional methods of voltage stability analysis. Simulation results on test power systems illustrate the problem of voltage stability and the limitations of conventional methods. The potential of Artificial Neural Networks as a superior alternative is also discussed.
Classification of Voltage Stability
Voltage stability issues can be classified based on the time span of disturbances into short-term and long-term dynamics. Short-term or ‘transient’ dynamics, which last a few seconds, involve components like automatic voltage regulators, excitation systems, turbine and governor dynamics, as well as induction motors, electronically operated loads, and HVDC interconnections. If the system is stable, short-term disturbances subside, and the system transitions to slow long-term dynamics. Long-term dynamics, lasting from a few minutes to tens of minutes, involve components like transformer tap changers, limiters, and boilers. Voltage stability problems in the long-term time frame are mainly due to the large electrical distance between the generator and the load and are influenced by the detailed topology of the power system.

Figure 1: Illustrates the components and controls that may affect the voltage stability of a power system, along with their operational time frames.
Short-term or transient voltage instability examples include instability caused by rotor angle imbalance or loss of synchronism. Recent studies indicate that the integration of highly stressed HVDC links degrades the transient voltage stability of the system.
Voltage instability in power systems is a significant concern, particularly during both transient and long-term events. Let's break down the key points from the provided information:
1. Transient Voltage Instability
• Nature of Instability: Rapid events, often not allowing time for operator intervention.
• Automatic Corrective Actions: Relies on protective devices to maintain system operation by isolating unstable parts.
• Typical Scenarios: Sudden, large disturbances like faults or rapid load changes.
2. Long-Term Voltage Instability
• Nature of Instability: Occurs over a longer period, allowing potential operator intervention.
• Triggering Factors:
o High power imports from remote generators.
o Large disturbances or significant load build-up.
• Corrective Measures:
o Reactive power compensation.
o Load shedding to stabilize the system.
• Operator Role: Can intervene if the time scale permits, implementing preventive measures.
3. Voltage Stability Analysis Techniques
• Small-Disturbance (Steady State) Voltage Stability:
o Scenario: System subjected to small perturbations.
o Analysis: Linearizing around the pre-disturbance operating point.
o Utility: Provides a qualitative picture of system stress and proximity to instability.
o Example: Gradual changes in load.
• Large-Disturbance Voltage Stability:
o Scenario: Larger disturbances such as loss of generation or transmission lines.
o Analysis: Requires dynamic analysis over the disturbance time frame.
o Utility: Captures system dynamics to understand stability.
4. Voltage Stability in a 2-Bus System
• Concept Explanation: Simplified using a 2-bus system with a constant power load.


Figure 2: 2-bus test system
5. Voltage Instability Dynamics
• High Voltage (Stable) vs. Low Voltage (Unstable) Solutions: Each point (p, q) has two voltage solutions.
• Maximum Power Point: Where the two voltage solutions converge, indicating the limit of power transfer capability.
• Real System Factors:
o Transmission capability.
o Generator reactive power and voltage control limits.
o Load voltage sensitivity.
o Reactive compensation devices.
o Voltage control devices like ULTCs.
Understanding voltage instability involves analyzing both transient and long-term phenomena using appropriate stability analysis techniques. Small-disturbance analysis provides insights into gradual changes, while large-disturbance analysis captures the system's dynamic response to significant events. The stability of a simplified 2-bus system helps illustrate fundamental concepts, while real-world systems require consideration of numerous additional factors.

Figure 3: Variation of bus voltage with active and reactive loading for the 2-bus test system
Methods for Steady State Voltage Stability Analysis
Voltage stability analysis is essential for ensuring reliable operation of power systems. Here are the main methods used for this analysis:
1. P-V Curve Method
This method plots the voltage (V) of a critical or representative bus against the real power (P) consumed. It provides the active power margin before voltage instability occurs.
Application:
• For radial systems: Monitors the voltage of the critical bus against real power consumption changes.
• For meshed networks: P can be the total active load in the load area, and V can be the voltage of a critical bus.
Steps:
1. Model the system as a two-bus system.
2. Use the inequality (1 - 4q - 4p^2) ≥ 0 to find real solutions of v2, where q/p = k (constant).
3. For values of ‘p’ satisfying p ≤ 1/2 + (1/2)√((1-k)k), there are two solutions for voltage (v1 and v2).
4. Calculate the active power margin for different power factors (k values).
Limitations:
• May require adjustments for real systems with multiple buses.
• Generations are rescheduled at each load change.
• Network topology changes can affect accuracy.

Figure 4: Normalized P-V curves for the 2-bus test system
2. V-Q Curve Method and Reactive Power Reserve
This method plots the voltage (V) at a test or critical bus against the reactive power (Q) at that bus. It helps identify voltage instability during the post-transient period.
Application:
• Does not require system representation as a two-bus equivalent.
• A fictitious synchronous generator with zero active power and no reactive power limit is connected to the test bus.
Steps:
1. Run a power-flow program for specified voltages with the test bus as the generator bus.
2. Note the reactive power at the bus and plot it against the specified voltage.
3. Identify the operating point where reactive power is zero.
4. Evaluate voltage security and reactive power margin from the V-Q curve.
Indicators:
• Reactive Power Margin: Distance between operating point and the nose point of the V-Q curve or where capacitor characteristics tangent the curve.
• Bus Stiffness: Slope of the right portion of the V-Q curve. Steeper slopes indicate less stiffness and higher vulnerability to voltage collapse.
3. Methods Based on Singularity of Power Flow Jacobian Matrix
This method involves analyzing the power flow Jacobian matrix to identify points of voltage collapse.
Application:
• Uses the singularity (or near-singularity) of the Jacobian matrix as an indicator of voltage instability.
• Detects when the system approaches a critical point.
4. Continuation Power Flow Method
This method extends the power flow solution by continuously increasing load or generation to trace the P-V curve beyond the collapse point.
Steps:
1. Start from a known operating point.
2. Incrementally increase the load or generation.
3. Solve power flow equations iteratively.
4. Trace the P-V curve to identify the collapse point and beyond.
Practical Considerations:
1. Network Representation: Accurately model the system, including generator reactive power limits and changing network topology.
2. Generation Rescheduling: Adjust generation at each step of load change.
3. Reactive Power Sources: Ensure sufficient reactive power sources to maintain voltage stability.
Each method provides unique insights into voltage stability, with the P-V curve method being widely used for its simplicity and effectiveness. The V-Q curve method offers detailed insights into reactive power reserves and bus stiffness. Analyzing the power flow Jacobian matrix and using continuation power flow methods provide deeper analytical approaches to understanding voltage stability and predicting collapse points.

Figure 5: Normalized V-Q curves for the 2-bus test system
Singularity-Based Voltage Stability Analysis Using Modal Analysis
Voltage stability in power systems can be assessed by examining the power flow Jacobian matrix, which becomes singular at the point of voltage collapse. One effective method for this analysis is modal analysis of the Jacobian matrix.
Modal Analysis
For an n×n square matrix A, the left and right eigenvectors are defined as: Ax=λx, yA=λy where:
• λ is the eigenvalue of matrix A,
• x (right eigenvector) is an n×1 vector,
• y (left eigenvector) is a 1×n vector.
The characteristic equation for A is given by: det(A−λI)=0. The solutions λ1,λ2,…,λn are the eigenvalues of A. The corresponding right and left eigenvectors are xi and yi, respectively. In matrix form, the right eigenvector matrix X and the left eigenvector matrix Y are:



Figure 6: Single line diagram of the 10-bus test system
Application to 10-Bus Test System
Modal analysis is applied to a 10-bus test system to determine voltage stability. Data for the system includes transmission lines, transformers, shunt capacitors, loads, and generators. The eigenvalues of the reduced Jacobian matrix are calculated for various load levels, indicating the proximity to voltage collapse.
The minimum eigenvalue of the reduced Jacobian matrix serves as an indicator of voltage stability. As the load increases, the smallest eigenvalue decreases, approaching zero at the point of voltage collapse. This methodology provides a quantitative measure of the system's stability margin and helps in identifying the critical load level beyond which the system becomes unstable.


Figure 7: Variation of the real parts of the smallest two eigenvalues of the reduced Jacobian matrix against load multiplication factor for the 10-bus test system
Continuation power flow is an advanced numerical technique used to obtain power flow solutions near or at the voltage collapse point, where traditional power flow methods fail due to the Jacobian matrix becoming singular. Here's a breakdown of the key concepts and equations involved:
Power Flow Equations
The power flow equations for active and reactive power can be represented as:

Combined Power Flow Equation
These equations can be combined and expressed as:

Incorporating the Loading Parameter
Considering the variation of load, the power flow equation can be rewritten with a loading parameter K:

Augmented Power Flow Equation
The augmented equation, incorporating the loading parameter, becomes:

Jacobian Matrix and Continuation Method
To address the issue of the Jacobian matrix JJJ approaching singularity near the voltage collapse point, the continuation power flow method is used. This involves adding an extra equation by fixing one of the variables, known as the continuation variable. The Jacobian matrix is then expanded to include this additional constraint.
Predictor Step
The predictor step involves solving the modified system of equations:

Corrector Step
The corrector step refines the predictor solution to ensure it lies on the desired solution curve. This involves solving the system:

Continuation Power Flow Method
The continuation power flow method allows the computation of load voltage even when the Jacobian matrix is singular, enabling the tracing of the complete PV curve, including the nose point and the lower part of the curve.
PV Curve Illustration
The PV curve shows the relationship between the power (P) and the voltage (V) at a particular bus. Continuation power flow allows plotting the entire PV curve, including the critical voltage collapse point.
Example: 10-Bus Test System
Using a tool like PSAT, the complete PV curve for a bus in a 10-bus test system can be plotted, demonstrating the effectiveness of continuation power flow in handling voltage stability analysis.
This approach is crucial for understanding and preventing voltage collapse in power systems, ensuring reliable operation under varying load conditions.

Figure 8: PV curve of bus-4 for the 10-bus test system, obtained by using continuation power flow
Voltage stability of the 10-bus test system is significantly influenced by loading conditions, transformer tap settings, and line outages. LTCs can help manage voltage levels but have limitations, especially during line outages. Modal analysis of the reduced Jacobian matrix provides valuable insights into the system's stability and proximity to voltage collapse.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DIAGRAM
Figure 1: Illustrates the components and controls that may affect the voltage stability of a power system, along with their operational time frames.
Figure 2: 2-bus test system
Figure 3: Variation of bus voltage with active and reactive loading for the 2-bus test system
Figure 4: Normalized P-V curves for the 2-bus test system
Figure 5: Normalized V-Q curves for the 2-bus test system
Figure 6: Single line diagram of the 10-bus test system
Figure 7: Variation of the real parts of the smallest two eigenvalues of the reduced Jacobian matrix against load multiplication factor for the 10-bus test system
Figure 8: PV curve of bus-4 for the 10-bus test system, obtained by using continuation power flow , Claims:1. Development of Criteria for Power System Voltage Stability by Steady State Analysis claims that accurate identification of critical bus voltages is essential for assessing voltage stability in a power system.
2. Power flow analysis provides a comprehensive method for determining the steady-state voltage stability of a power system by analyzing bus voltages, power flows, and system loads.
3. Calculating the voltage stability margin is crucial for understanding the proximity of the system to voltage instability or collapse.
4. Performing load sensitivity analysis helps in identifying the impact of load variations on system voltage stability.
5. Modal analysis of the power flow Jacobian matrix can effectively determine weak areas in the power system and predict voltage collapse points.
6. Implementing reactive power compensation strategies, such as shunt capacitors and FACTS devices, enhances voltage stability.
7. Accurate modeling of generators and loads, including their dynamic characteristics, is vital for reliable voltage stability assessment.
8. Voltage stability indices, such as the Voltage Collapse Proximity Indicator (VCPI), provide quantifiable measures to evaluate system stability.
9. Assessing the impact of network topology changes, including line outages and reconfigurations, is important for maintaining voltage stability.
10. The integration of renewable energy sources necessitates updated voltage stability criteria to account for their variable and intermittent nature.