Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Employee Assessment

Abstract: A method and system is provided for identifying employees with high potential. The present method and system for selecting a set of employees for testing and then selecting attributes of the employees using various feature extraction techniques. Thereafter, the method includes combining attributes selected from the feature extraction techniques. After combining the attributes, the method may include utilizing a classification or ranking model to label employees as high and non-high potential employees. Further, the method includes receiving attributes and a reference set of employees from a user. Thereafter, a distance based approach is utilized to identify high potential employees.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
13 February 2015
Publication Number
36/2016
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMPUTER SCIENCE
Status
Email
iprdel@lakshmisri.com
Parent Application

Applicants

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
Nirmal Building, 9th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021, India

Inventors

1. PALSHIKAR, Girish Keshav
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
2. SRIVASTAVA, Rajiv
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
3. SAHU, Kuleshwar
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
4. GHAROTE, Mangesh
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
5. JAIN, Ankita
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India
6. GUPTA, Mohit
TRDDC, 54B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune 411013, Maharashtra, India

Specification

DESC:METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT ,CLAIMS:1. A method for identification of high potential employees; said method comprising processor implemented steps of:
generating, a Human Capital Value (HCV) data model, wherein the HCV data model comprises attributes for each employee of an organization;
receiving, one or more employees to be classified into high potential employees and non-high potential employees;
receiving, all attributes for the one or more employees from the HCV data model;
selecting, a plurality of attributes as important attributes for the one or more employees from all attributes, wherein selection is based on either a plurality of feature extraction techniques or user input;
generating a combined attribute set, wherein generating a combined attribute set comprises:
ranking the plurality of attributes based on distinguishing capability among high potential employees and non-high potential employees.; and
combining, a predefined number of top ranking attributes of each of the plurality of feature extraction technique; and
identifying, the high potential employees, by labelling each of the one or more employees as high potential employees or non-high potential employees wherein the labelling is performed using at least one of classification model based approach and reference set based approach and is based on the combined attribute set.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the HCV data model is generated based on attributes of each employee, such that attributes are extracted from a backend database of an employee organization’s enterprise application wherein the attributes comprise demographics, skill set, organizational experiences, training and certifications, efforts and project related data of an employee.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality attributes are selected using a plurality of feature extraction techniques such that the plurality of feature extraction techniques comprise one or more of Weka based feature extraction techniques.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the classification model based approach comprises:
using at least one of Weka based classification techniques for classification of employees; and
ranking the employees based on the combined attribute set wherein the higher ranked employees are labelled as high potential employees.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the reference set based approach comprises:
performing principle component analysis (PCA) on the selected plurality of attributes;
receiving a reference set of employees comprising employees who are identified as high performance employees on the basis of having exceptional attributes than others, wherein the reference set is created based on predefined criteria;
calculating, the distance between the one or more employees and the reference set of employees, wherein distances calculation dataset is under PCA space and uses Mahalanobis distance calculation approach;
deriving, a threshold value of distance using quartile statistics; and
labelling each of the plurality of employees below the threshold value as high potential employees.

6. A system for identification of high potential employees; said system comprising a processor and a memory coupled to the processor, comprising computer implemented instruction to:
generate, a Human Capital Value (HCV) data model, wherein the HCV data model comprises attributes for each employee of an organization;
receive, one or more employees to be classified into high potential employees and non-high potential employees;
receive, all attributes for the one or more employees from the HCV data model;
select, a plurality of attributes as important attributes for the one or more employees from all attributes, wherein selection is based on either a plurality of feature extraction techniques or user input;
generate a combined attribute set, wherein generating a combined attribute set comprises:
ranking the plurality of attributes based on distinguishing capability among high potential employees and non-high potential employees.; and
combining, a predefined number of top ranking attributes of each of the plurality of feature extraction technique; and
identify, the high potential employees, by labelling each of the one or more employees as high potential employees or non-high potential employees wherein the labelling is performed using at least one of classification model based approach and reference set based approach and is based on the combined attribute set.

7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the HCV data model is generated based on attributes of each employee, such that attributes are extracted from a backend database of an employee organization’s enterprise application wherein the attributes comprise demographics, skill set, organizational experiences, training and certifications, efforts and project related data of an employee.

8. The system according to claim 6, wherein the plurality attributes are selected using a plurality of feature extraction techniques such that the plurality of feature extraction techniques comprise one or more of Weka based feature extraction techniques.

9. The method according to claim 6, wherein the classification model based approach comprises:
using at least one of Weka based classification techniques for classification of employees; and
ranking the employees based on the combined attribute set wherein the higher ranked employees are labelled as high potential employees.

10. The method according to claim 6, wherein the reference set based approach comprises:
performing principle component analysis (PCA) on the selected plurality of attributes;
receiving a reference set of employees comprising employees who are previously identified as high performance employees, wherein the reference set is based on predefined criteria;
calculating, the distance between the one or more employees and the reference set of employees, wherein distances calculation dataset is under PCA space and uses Mahalanobis distance calculation approach;
deriving, a threshold value of distance using quartile statistics; and
labelling each of the plurality of employees below the threshold value as high potential employees.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 480-MUM-2015-POWER OF AUTHORITY-(21-04-2015).pdf 2015-04-21
2 480-MUM-2015-CORRESPONDENCE-(21-04-2015).pdf 2015-04-21
3 REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [08-02-2016(online)].pdf 2016-02-08
4 OTHERS [12-02-2016(online)].pdf 2016-02-12
5 Drawing [12-02-2016(online)].pdf 2016-02-12
6 Description(Complete) [12-02-2016(online)].pdf 2016-02-12
7 Form 3 [14-10-2016(online)].pdf 2016-10-14
8 PD015342IN-SC SPEC FOR FILING.pdf ONLINE 2018-08-11
9 PD015342IN-SC SPEC FOR FILING.pdf 2018-08-11
10 PD015342IN-SC FORM 3.pdf ONLINE 2018-08-11
11 PD015342IN-SC FORM 3.pdf 2018-08-11
12 PD015342IN-SC FIGURES FOR FILING.pdf ONLINE 2018-08-11
13 PD015342IN-SC FIGURES FOR FILING.pdf 2018-08-11
14 Form-18(Online).pdf 2018-08-11
15 480-MUM-2015-Form 1-100715.pdf 2018-08-11
16 480-MUM-2015-Correspondence-100715.pdf 2018-08-11
17 480-MUM-2015-FER.pdf 2020-03-23
18 480-MUM-2015-Information under section 8(2) [01-09-2020(online)].pdf 2020-09-01
19 480-MUM-2015-FORM 3 [01-09-2020(online)].pdf 2020-09-01
20 480-MUM-2015-OTHERS [23-09-2020(online)].pdf 2020-09-23
21 480-MUM-2015-FER_SER_REPLY [23-09-2020(online)].pdf 2020-09-23
22 480-MUM-2015-CLAIMS [23-09-2020(online)].pdf 2020-09-23
23 480-MUM-2015-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-27-02-2023).pdf 2023-01-10
24 480-MUM-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [21-02-2023(online)].pdf 2023-02-21

Search Strategy

1 2021-02-2611-18-28AE_26-02-2021.pdf
2 2020-02-1815-38-01_18-02-2020.pdf