Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Process For Making A Filter And Filter Obtained Therefrom

Abstract: The present invention relates to filters, particularly for filtration of water under gravity and to a process for making such filters. The invention also relates to a gravity filtration device using the filter of the invention. It is thus an object of the present invention to provide for a moulded filter that is more reliable and is prone to fewer leaks as compared to similar types of prior art filters The invention provides a process for making a filter comprising the steps of: (viii) placing polymer of desired thickness of an end plate in a mould; (ix) mixing particulate filter media and polymeric binder having a melt flow rate less than 5grams/10 minutes; (x) adding the mixture of step (b) to the mould; (xi) heating said mold to a temperature in the range 150oC to 350oC, and (xii) demolding the molded filter.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
23 June 2006
Publication Number
27/2008
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2015-08-24
Renewal Date

Applicants

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER HOUSE, 165-166 BACKBAY RECLAMATION, MUMBAI 400 020,

Inventors

1. BANSODE SHARADCHANDRA GOVIND
E-9, SATGURE APRTMENTS LBS ROAD, BEHIND HOTEL ROYAL INN, THANE-400601,
2. GUPTA ARUNIMA
SAVITRI SADAN, NORTH SOUTH ROAD NO.12, JVPD SCHEMEM, JUHU, MUMBAI-400049,
3. SRIVASTAVA MADALASA
706, HRISHIKESH APARTMENTS, V.S.MARG, NEAR SIDHIVINAYAK TEMPLE, PRABHADEVI, DADAR(WEST), MUMBAI-400026,

Specification

FORM - 2
THE PATENTS ACT, 1970
(39 of 1970)
&
The Patents Rules, 2006
PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION
(See Section 10 and Rule 13)
FILTER AND PROCESS TO PREPARE THE SAME
HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 and having its registered office at Hindustan Lever House, 165/166, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai -400 020, Maharashtra, India
The following specification describes the invention

Technical field
The present invention relates to filters, particularly for filtration of water under gravity and to a process for making such filters. The invention also relates to a gravity filtration device using the filter of the invention.
Background and prior art
In urban areas, people receive water from a network of pipes, after being purified in municipal water treatment plants. This water is usually more fit for drinking as compared to drinking water available in smaller towns, villages and other rural areas. In these rural areas, water is directly collected from lakes, rivers and wells and there are few if any centralized water treatment plants. People have to individually purify the water collected by them. People usually resort to boiling to kill the germs. However, boiling is quite expensive and requires the use of fuel like coal, wood or oil which are scarce in rural areas. Many people use flocculants like alum, but these methods merely clarify the water but do not kill the germs. There have been many attempts to provide simple and inexpensive devices that can be used by a family to provide for their drinking water needs. One such type of household device is based on irradiating the feed water with ultraviolet radiation that kills the bacteria and virus. However such type of device requires the availability of power supply which is very often not available on a continuous basis especially in rural areas. Another type of household device is based on filtration through a membrane. This type of device which is based on the principle of reverse osmosis also requires the availability of power supply and water pressure. In the rural areas, water is usually not available at high pressure. Water is usually collected from the lakes, rivers and wells in pots and carried by hand to the households.
Many attempts have been made to provide water purification devices that do not need availability of power supply or high pressure water. However, most of those devices do not meet the stringent requirements set by international agencies like WHO which is needed to be met to ensure that water is safe for human consumption so that people can lead a life free of water borne diseases. The water generally needs to be free of dispersed mud and soil, dissolved salts, dispersed organic matter like humic acids from soil, solvents, pesticides and pesticide residues, and pathogenic organisms like cysts, bacteria and virus. WO2005095284 discloses one such device which claims to meet removal of the above contaminants to a sufficient extent to meet the stringent WHO
2

specifications. This publication WO2005095284 describes a gravity fed water purification system comprising a filtration unit for filtering particulate and soluble material from the input water, a chemical dispensing unit for controlled dispensing of a biocide into the water followed by a retention chamber for retaining the treated water for a predetermined period of time before the water exits the purification system through a scavenger means for removing the dispensed biocide from the water. The filtration unit in the above publication is preferably a carbon block made by moulding activated carbon particles along with a polymeric binder at high temperature and pressure. The base plate of the carbon block is usually made of a thermoplastic material like polypropylene, polyethylene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) or styrene acrylonitrile (SAN). These base plates are usually glued on to the carbon block using glues like hot melt adhesives.
US4753728 (Amway 1988) describes a carbon particle filter comprising carbon particles bonded into a filter block by a low melt index polymeric material having a melt index of less than 1 gram per 10 minutes as determined by ASTM D1238 at 190 degree C, and 15 kilograms load, whereby said polymeric material will tackify at elevated temperatures without becoming sufficiently liquid to substantially wet the carbon particles. The end plates in this publication are separately moulded in slush molds by dipping the moulded carbon block in a pool of melted polypropylene. The process described is a multistep process and involved manufacturing complexities.
The present inventors have found that there are several disadvantages of filter blocks made with end plates glued/moulded on externally. Firstly there is a high degree of unreliability in this process of external gluing. The chances of leakage are high. Further the end plate has to be sealed to the water filtration device using rubber gaskets. In such a method of sealing, the tolerance in the angle at which the end plate is glued to the carbon block is very low. What this means is that the variation in the angle of the end plate to the axis of the carbon block over a large number of filters manufactured has to be very small, to minimize the amount of quality rejections. Further it has been observed that the multi step process comprising moulding the carbon block followed by gluing the end plate is rather cumbersome for the manufacturing teams. This complexity along with the concomitant high rejection rates made for the prior art process of making these filters and the resultant filters rather expensive.
3

The present inventors have found that it is possible to manufacture filters comprising filter blocks in a simple and inexpensive manner by moulding the filter block and the end plate in a single step process by using polymeric binders for the filter block and a polymer for the end plate both meeting a selective specification. The present inventors have found that it is possible to overcome most of the disadvantages of such types of filters manufactured in the past.
Objects of the invention
It is thus an object of the present invention to provide for a moulded filter that is more reliable and is prone to fewer leaks as compared to similar types of prior art filters.
It is another object of the present invention to provide for a filter which is prone to fewer leaks, but at the same time is less expensive, as compared to similar prior art filters..
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide for a less expensive and more reliable filter block based filter that can be manufactured using a process that is simpler as compared to similar filters manufactured in the past.
Summary of the invention
Thus according to the first aspect of the invention there is provided a filter comprising:
(a) a filter block comprising filter particulate filter media and polymeric binder having melt flow rate less than 5 grams/10 minutes; and
(b) an end plate integrally moulded to said filter block, said end plate having a port for passage of liquid and made of a polymer having melt flow rate less than 5 grams/10 minutes.
Most suitable particulate filter media as per the invention is activated carbon particles.
It is particularly preferred that the liquid to be filtered is water. It is further particularly preferred that the water is filtered under gravity.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a gravity filtration device comprising
(a) a top chamber and a bottom chamber;
4

(b) the filter according to the first aspect of the invention detachably attachable to base of said top chamber;
(c) a sediment filter capable of removing suspended particulate material detachably mountable on said filter;
such that liquid fed to the top chamber is filtered through said sediment filter and said filter before collecting in said bottom chamber.
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a gravity filtration device comprising
(a) a top chamber and a bottom chamber;
(b) a first filter detachably attachable to base of said top chamber;
(c) a sediment filter capable of removing suspended particulate material detachably mountable on said first filter;
(d) a biocide feeder;
(e) a retention chamber and
(f) a second filter
such that liquid fed to said top chamber is filtered through said sediment filter and said first filter before being treated with a biocide fed by said biocide feeder, the biocide treated liquid is then retained in said retention chamber for a predetermined period of time, after which the retained liquid is filtered free of excess biocide through the second filter before collecting in said bottom chamber, wherein said first filter or said second filter or both are filters as per the first aspect of the invention..
These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will be readily understood and appreciated by reference to the non-limiting detailed description of the preferred embodiment.
Detailed description of the invention
The invention provides for filter comprising a filter block comprising particulate filter media and polymeric binder having specific selective characteristics and an end plate integrally moulded to the filter block, the end plate made of a polymer having a specific selective characteristic and the end plate has a port for passage of liquid.
5

Particulate filter media according to the invention is preferably selected from the group consisting of diatomaceous earth, ceramic beads, clay, glass bead, polystyrene resin bead, or activated carbon, more preferably the particulate filter media is activated carbon.
Activated carbon is preferably selected from one or more of bituminous coal, coconut shell, wood and petroleum tar. Surface area of the activated carbon preferably exceeds 500 m2/g, more preferably exceeds 1000 m2/g. Preferably, the activated carbon has a size uniformity co-efficient of less than 2, more preferably less than 1.5, Carbon Tetrachloride number exceeding 50%, more preferably exceeding 60%. The activated carbon preferably has an Iodine number greater than 800, more preferably greater than 1000.
The particle size of the particulate filter media is selected such that preferably not more than 5% particles pass through a sieve of 30 mesh and not more than 5% is retained on a sieve of 12 mesh.
Both the polymeric binder and the polymer of the end plate are selected such that they have a melt flow rate less than 5 gram/10 minutes, more preferably less than 2 gram/10 minutes and further more preferably less than 1 gram/10 minutes. The melt-flow rate (MFR) is measured using ASTM D 1238 (ISO 1133) test. The test measures the flow of a molten polymer through an extrusion plastometer under specific temperature and load conditions. The extrusion plastometer consists of a vertical cylinder with a small die of 2 mm at the bottom and a removable piston at the top. A charge of material is placed in the cylinder and preheated for several minutes. The piston is placed on top of the molten polymer and its weight forces the polymer through the die and on to a collecting plate. The time interval for the test ranges from 15 seconds to 15 minutes in order to accommodate the different viscosities of plastics. Temperatures used are 190, 220, 250 and 300 °C (428, 482 and 572°F). Loads used are 1.2, 5, 10 and 15 kg. As per the present invention the tests are done at 190 °C at 15 kg load. The amount of polymer collected after a specific interval is weighed and normalized to the number of grams that would have been extruded in 10 minutes: melt flow rate is expressed in grams per reference time.
6

Suitable examples of polymeric binder and polymer include ultra high molecular weight polymer preferably polyethylene, polypropylene and combinations thereof, which have these low MFR values. The molecular weight is preferably in the range of 106 to 109 g/mole. Binders of this class are commercially available under the trade names HOSTALEN from Tycona GMBH, GUR, Sunfine (from Asahi, Japan), Hizex (from Mitsubishi) and from Brasken Corp (Brazil). Other suitable binders include LDPE sold as Lupolen (from Basel Polyolefins) and LLDPE from Qunos (Australia).
According to an optimal aspect of the invention the polymeric binder and the polymer of the end plate are the same material. The bulk density of the polymeric binder and the polymer are preferably less than or equal to 0.6 g/cm3, more preferably less than or equal to 0.5 g/cm3, and further more preferably less than or equal to 0.25 g/cm3.
It has been observed that if the end plate polymer has a Melt Flow Rate greater than 5 grams/10 minutes, it is difficult to release the filter from the mould. This problem can be alleviated if the filter block surface is made very smooth or a very small clearance is provided between the filter block and the mould. Achieving these stringent process conditions are often very difficult in a large scale manufacturing facility. Thus use of a polymer for the end plates having the selective characteristics as per the invention provides for smooth and efficient demoulding.
The particle size of the polymeric binder is preferably selected such that the average particle size of the polymeric binder particles is in the range of 100 to 180 microns.
The filter block preferably comprises 50-95% particulate filter media and 5-50% polymeric binder by weight of the filter block.
The above disclosed filter of the invention is adapted to provide for removal of chemical contaminants and for effective removal of at least 3-log i.e. 99.9% of cysts such as Giardia lamblia, Cryptospordirium parvum and Entamoeba histolica. That is to say, if the input water contains 1000 cysts, the output water will contain at the most only 1 cyst. The filter of the invention is also suitable as a scavenger for removal of balance biocide and halogens like chlorine, bromine or iodine from water treated with such biocide. Thus such biocide kills the germs in the feed water and the balance biocide can be scavenged
7

by the filter of the invention thus making the treated water highly suitable for human consumption.
The filter of the invention preferably comprises a second end plate integrally moulded to filter block, said second end plate made of a polymer having a melt flow rate less than 5 grams/10 minutes. The second end plate optionally has a port for passage of liquid
The filter block can be of any desired shape depending on the end application/ use. Suitable shapes include flat circular disc, square disc, tapered flat disc, cylindrical, hollow cylindrical, solid conical, hollow hemispherical and hollow cone.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a gravity filtration device comprising a top chamber and a bottom chamber; the filter according to the first aspect of the invention detachably attachable to base of said top chamber; a sediment filter detachably mountable on said filter; such that liquid fed to the top chamber is filtered through said sediment filter and said filter before collecting in said bottom chamber.
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a gravity filtration device comprising a top chamber and a bottom chamber; a first filter detachably attachable to base of said top chamber; a sediment filter detachably mountable on said first filter; a biocide feeder; a retention chamber and a second filter; such that liquid fed to said top chamber is filtered through said sediment filter and said first filter before being treated with a biocide fed by said biocide feeder, the biocide treated liquid is then retained in said retention chamber for a predetermined period of time, after which the retained liquid is filtered free of excess biocide through said second filter before collecting in said bottom chamber wherein said first filter or said second filter or both are filters as per the first aspect of the invention. .
The sediment filter is generally capable of removing dissolved and dispersed organic matter in the feed liquid and particulate matter having a size greater than 3 microns. The sediment filter is washable and removable and is preferably made of a woven or non-woven fabric, more preferably a non-woven fabric having micro porous structure. The sediment filter can be washed and rinsed under flowing tap water or by using a
8

small amount (0.1-10 g/L) of fabric wash detergent in water. This facilitates wide and extensive application of the filter of the invention.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a process for making a filter comprising the steps of
a) placing polymer to desired thickness of an end plate in a mould;
b) mixing particulate filter media and polymeric binder having a melt flow rate less than 5 grams/10 minutes;
c) adding the mixture of step (b) to the mould;
d) heating said mold to a temperature in the range 150°C to 350°C; and
e) demolding the molded filter.
The polymeric binder and said activated particulate filter media are mixed for at least 15 minutes, more preferably for a period of time from 20 to 60 minutes before adding to the mould. Mixing is preferably done in vessels which include an agitator, mixer with dulled impeller blades, ribbon blender, rotary mixer, sigma mixer or any other low shear mixer that does not significantly alter the particle size distribution. Any of the above mentioned powder mixers may be used for this purpose but a suitable mixer is a sigma mixer. It is optional but preferred that this step of mixing is carried out in the presence of a fluid e.g water or an organic solvent like an alcohol. The amount of fluid used is preferably not more that 4 times the amount of activated carbon particles by weight, and more preferably not more than 3 times, most preferably from 0.5 to1.5 times.
The above mixture is preferably not vibrated, however, vibrating the mixture for a short period, e.g. 3-10 minutes can also be used to ensure that mixture, before moulding, becomes compact. The vibratory compaction is preferably carried out in a vibrator having a frequency in the range of 30 to 100 Hz. This process step is preferably carried out for a period of at least one minute, more preferably for 3 to 10 minutes. The compacted mass is then placed in a mould of pre-selected size and shape.
The mould is made of aluminum, cast iron, steel or any material capable of withstanding temperatures exceeding 400 °C.
9

A mould release agent is preferably coated on the inside surface of the mould. The mould release agent is preferably selected from silicone oil, aluminum foil, or the mould can be coated with suitable materials like Teflon or any other commercially available mould release agent that has little or no adsorption onto the filter medium.
More preferred temperatures for thermosetting the filter in the process of the invention is from 200°C to 300 °C. The mould is kept heated for more than 60 minutes, preferably 90 to 300 minutes. The mould is preferably heated in an oven using a non-convection, forced air or forced inert-gas convection oven.
The mould is then cooled and the moulded filter released from the mould.
A second end plate may be integrally moulded on to the carbon block by placing polymer to desired thickness of the second end plate in the mould.
The process of the invention optionally comprises compressing the mould before the heating step. When compression is applied, the pressure is preferably not more than 12 Kg/cm2, more preferably in the range of from 4 to 8 kg/cm2. The pressure is preferably applied using either a hydraulic press or a pneumatic press, more preferably a hydraulic press.
The polymer used for the end plates may be added in the form of particles in the mould or may be premoulded into a desired shape before placing in the mould.
This and other objects of the invention, its' advantages and method use will now be described with the help of the following figures. The figures depicted and described herein form an embodiment of the invention and has been incorporated for illustrative purpose only. These should not be construed so as to limit the invention in any manner, as it would be obvious to the reader that many such embodiments are possible without diverting from the scope of the invention. In light thereof, variations and modifications will be suggested to one skilled in the art, all of which are within the spirit and purview of this invention.
10

Brief Description of the Figures
Figure-1 is a front view of an embodiment of the filter as per the invention comprising a carbon block.
Figure-2 is a top view of the embodiment of Figure-1.
Detailed Description of the Figures
Figure -1 depicts an embodiment of a filter (F) comprising a carbon block (CB). The carbon block of this embodiment has a cylindrical shape with a central hallow bore along the longitudinal axis. A first end plate (FEP) is integrally moulded to the top end of the carbon block. A water impervious second end plate (SEP) is integrally moulded to the bottom of the carbon block. The first end plate comprises a port (PO) for passage of water therethrough. A cylindrical pipe (P) made of rigid polymer having holes on the circumferential surface is inserted in the central hollow bore to provide structural support to the carbon block and facilitate flow of water. A gasket (G) is provided on the first end plate (FEP) to enable fixing the carbon block into the filter. Threadings (T) provided on the pipe (P) enable attaching the filter on to a filtration device.
The filter (F) is prepared by the following process. A cylindrical mould having the shape and configuration of the filter as shown in Figure-1 is taken. A premoulded water impervious second end plate (SEP) is placed at the bottom of the mould. The second end plate is made of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene having a molecular weight of 106 and a melt flow rate of (MFR) of approximately 0 grams/10 minutes, procured from Tycona GMBH. Activated carbon particles having a particle size such that not more than 5 wt% is retained on 12 mesh and not more than 5% passes through 30 mesh is mixed with particles of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene having an MFR ~ 0 having an average particle size of 140 microns in a ratio of 6.5: 1 in a sigma mixer for 30 minutes. The mixture is then added to the mould while ensuring that a solid metal pipe having the dimensions of the pipe (P) are placed in the mould along the longitudinal axis. Powder of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene having an MFR ~ 0 to a height corresponding to the desired height of the first end plate (FEP) is then added. The mould is then compressed to a pressure of 5-8 kg/cm2 and heated in a furnace to a temperature in the range of 200 to 280 °C for 2.5 hours. The mould is then cooled and the carbon block demoulded. The solid metal pipe is then removed and the pipe (P) is then placed in the
11

central bore followed by the gasket (G). The filter is then screwed on a desired water filtration device using threads (T).
Figure-2 depicts the top view of the filter as per Figure-1 with the parts labeled using the same legends.
When in use, water enters through inlet (I) and flows in the directions depicted by the arrows. The water is filtered as it flows radially inward into the central bore of the carbon block. The filtered water then exits through exit (E).
The invention thus provides for a carbon block filter media, a process for preparing the same and water filters which can be prepared using such carbon blocks which provide for the desired filtration efficiency of water under gravity flow conditions while providing the desired high flow rate.
Dated this 23rd day of June 2006.
Hindustan Lever Limited.
(S. Venkatramani)
Senior Patent Manager.
12

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 988-MUM-2006-FORM 18(22-08-2008).pdf 2008-08-22
1 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [20-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-20
2 988-MUM-2006-COREPONDENCE(22-08-2008).pdf 2008-08-22
2 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [14-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-14
3 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [24-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-24
3 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(10-12-2013).pdf 2013-12-10
4 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [09-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-09
4 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(13-10-2014).pdf 2014-10-13
5 988-MUM-2006_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2018-08-09
5 988-MUM-2006-ABSTRACT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
6 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
6 988-MUM-2006-ABSTRACT(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
7 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
7 988-mum-2006-abstract-1.jpg 2018-08-09
8 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
8 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS AMENDED-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
9 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
9 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
10 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(AMENDED)-(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
10 988-MUM-2006-POWER OF ATTORNEY(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
11 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(AMENDED)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
11 988-MUM-2006-PETITION UNDER RULE 137(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
12 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(MARKED COPY)-(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
12 988-MUM-2006-OTHER DOCUMENT(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
13 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(MARKED COPY)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
13 988-MUM-2006-NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
14 988-mum-2006-correspondance-received.pdf 2018-08-09
14 988-MUM-2006-MARKED COPY-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
15 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1(24-9-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
15 988-MUM-2006-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
16 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(11-9-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
16 988-MUM-2006-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
17 988-mum-2006-form-3.pdf 2018-08-09
17 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(18-3-2014).pdf 2018-08-09
18 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(22-8-2008).pdf 2018-08-09
18 988-mum-2006-form-2.pdf 2018-08-09
19 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(30-3-2009).pdf 2018-08-09
20 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(30-8-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
20 988-mum-2006-form-1.pdf 2018-08-09
21 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(4-1-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
21 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-ISA-210-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
22 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(IPO)-(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
22 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-IPEA-415-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
23 988-MUM-2006-Correspondence-140815.pdf 2018-08-09
23 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-IPEA-409-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
24 988-MUM-2006-FORM 5(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
24 988-mum-2006-description (provisional).pdf 2018-08-09
25 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(8-8-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
25 988-MUM-2006-DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
26 988-MUM-2006-DRAWING(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
26 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
27 988-MUM-2006-DRAWING(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
27 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
28 988-mum-2006-drawing.pdf 2018-08-09
28 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(4-8-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
29 988-MUM-2006-EP DOCUMENT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
29 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
30 988-MUM-2006-FORM 1(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
30 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(25-4-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
31 988-MUM-2006-FORM 13(3-10-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
31 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(24-2-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
32 988-MUM-2006-FORM 13(8-2-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
32 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(23-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
33 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
33 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(22-6-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
34 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITEL PAGE)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
34 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(21-5-2014).pdf 2018-08-09
35 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
35 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(15-2-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
36 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(15-2-2011).pdf 2018-08-09
36 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(PROVISIONAL)-(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
37 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(12-8-2011).pdf 2018-08-09
38 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(PROVISIONAL)-(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
38 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(15-2-2011).pdf 2018-08-09
39 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
39 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(15-2-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
40 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(TITEL PAGE)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
40 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(21-5-2014).pdf 2018-08-09
41 988-MUM-2006-FORM 2(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
41 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(22-6-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
42 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(23-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
42 988-MUM-2006-FORM 13(8-2-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
43 988-MUM-2006-FORM 13(3-10-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
43 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(24-2-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
44 988-MUM-2006-FORM 1(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
44 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(25-4-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
45 988-MUM-2006-EP DOCUMENT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
45 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
46 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(4-8-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
46 988-mum-2006-drawing.pdf 2018-08-09
47 988-MUM-2006-DRAWING(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
47 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
48 988-MUM-2006-DRAWING(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
48 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
49 988-MUM-2006-DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE)-(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
49 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(8-8-2012).pdf 2018-08-09
50 988-mum-2006-description (provisional).pdf 2018-08-09
50 988-MUM-2006-FORM 5(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
51 988-MUM-2006-Correspondence-140815.pdf 2018-08-09
51 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-IPEA-409-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
52 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(IPO)-(23-6-2006).pdf 2018-08-09
52 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-IPEA-415-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
53 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(4-1-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
53 988-MUM-2006-FORM PCT-ISA-210-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
54 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(30-8-2010).pdf 2018-08-09
54 988-mum-2006-form-1.pdf 2018-08-09
55 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(30-3-2009).pdf 2018-08-09
56 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(22-8-2008).pdf 2018-08-09
56 988-mum-2006-form-2.pdf 2018-08-09
57 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(18-3-2014).pdf 2018-08-09
57 988-mum-2006-form-3.pdf 2018-08-09
58 988-MUM-2006-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
58 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(11-9-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
59 988-MUM-2006-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
59 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE 1(24-9-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
60 988-mum-2006-correspondance-received.pdf 2018-08-09
60 988-MUM-2006-MARKED COPY-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
61 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(MARKED COPY)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
61 988-MUM-2006-NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
62 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(MARKED COPY)-(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
62 988-MUM-2006-OTHER DOCUMENT(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
63 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(AMENDED)-(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
63 988-MUM-2006-PETITION UNDER RULE 137(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
64 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(AMENDED)-(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
64 988-MUM-2006-POWER OF ATTORNEY(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
65 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
65 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO EXAMINATION REPORT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
66 988-MUM-2006-CLAIMS AMENDED-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
66 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING(21-7-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
67 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING(6-5-2015).pdf 2018-08-09
67 988-mum-2006-abstract-1.jpg 2018-08-09
68 988-MUM-2006-REPLY TO HEARING-5-3-2015.pdf 2018-08-09
68 988-MUM-2006-ABSTRACT(7-6-2007).pdf 2018-08-09
69 988-MUM-2006_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2018-08-09
69 988-MUM-2006-ABSTRACT(28-1-2013).pdf 2018-08-09
70 988-MUM-2006-CORRESPONDENCE(13-10-2014).pdf 2014-10-13
70 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [09-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-09
71 988-MUM-2006-FORM 3(10-12-2013).pdf 2013-12-10
71 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [24-09-2021(online)].pdf 2021-09-24
72 988-MUM-2006-COREPONDENCE(22-08-2008).pdf 2008-08-22
72 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [14-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-14
73 988-MUM-2006-FORM 18(22-08-2008).pdf 2008-08-22
73 988-MUM-2006-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [20-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-20

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2008 - To 23/06/2009

4th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2009 - To 23/06/2010

5th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2010 - To 23/06/2011

6th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2011 - To 23/06/2012

7th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2012 - To 23/06/2013

8th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2013 - To 23/06/2014

9th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2014 - To 23/06/2015

10th: 10 Oct 2015

From 23/06/2015 - To 23/06/2016

11th: 24 May 2016

From 23/06/2016 - To 23/06/2017

12th: 30 May 2017

From 23/06/2017 - To 23/06/2018

13th: 25 May 2018

From 23/06/2018 - To 23/06/2019

14th: 27 May 2019

From 23/06/2019 - To 23/06/2020

15th: 20 Apr 2020

From 23/06/2020 - To 23/06/2021

16th: 03 May 2021

From 23/06/2021 - To 23/06/2022