Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Infant Formula Compositions Comprising Increased Amounts Of Alpha Lactalbumin

Abstract: An infant formula composition is provided comprising a whey fraction wherein 40% or less of the total protein in said fraction is alpha-lactalbumin and more than 8% of the total protein in said whey fraction is beta-lectoglobulin, with the proviso that the percentage of alpha-lactalbumin in said whey fraction is greater than the percentage of beta-lactoglobulin in said whey fraction.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
17 July 2008
Publication Number
06/2009
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
FOOD
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

WYETH
FIVE GIRALDA FIRMS, MADISON NJ

Inventors

1. KUHLMAN CHARLES FRANCIS
24 LANGSTOON LANE, MEDIA, PA 19063
2. LIEN ERIC LOUIS
1 ANTHONY LANE, MALVERN, PA 19335
3. WEABER JOHN RILEY
654 BROOKWOOD ROAD, WAYNE, PA 19087
4. O'CALLAGHAN DANIEL MARTIN
2 GREEN PARK CLOSE, SOUTH CIRCULAR ROAD, LIMERIC

Specification

THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN DIVIDED OUT OF INDIAN
APPLICATION NO, 872/KOLNP/2004
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention is directed to infant formula compositions which demonstrate
improved tolerance by infants. Specifically, the present invention is directed to infant
formula compositions comprising a modified whey protein concentrate comprising
specific amounts of alpha-lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Human milk is the preferred means for feeding the newborn human infant for
the first four to six months of life. Infant formulas have been developed to replace or
to supplement human milk when breast-feeding is inadequate, unsuccessful, or when
a mother chooses not to breast feed. Attempts of improving infant formula
composition have focused on more closely simulating the composition of breast milk.
Bovine milk has been used in infant formulas for over eighty years. However,
the protein systems of human milk and cow's milk differ substantially, both
quantitatively and qualitatively. Prominent quantitative differences include a lower
total protein content of human milk (11 g/L) compared to cow's milk (33 g/L) and a
difference in the ratio of whey proteins to caseins, which is 18:82 in bovine milk and
60:40 in human milk.
Attention in this area has focused on the notable qualitative differences
between bovine milk and human milk, in their amounts of individual whey proteins,
specifically alpha-lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin. Alpha-lactalbumin, a protein
found in the milk of all mammals, is a major protein in human milk. Beta-lactoglobulin
is absent from human milk. The protein content of bovine whey contains about 50%
to 55% of beta-lactoglobulin and about 18% of alpha-lactalbumin. The ratio of beta-
lactoglobulin to alpha-lactalbumin in bovine whey ranges between 2.5:1 and 4:1.
Furthermore, it is known that the elimination or removal of beta-lactoglobulin in


bovine milk increases the total amount of alpha-Iactalbumin from 18% to 40% of
bovine whey proteins, de Wit, J. N., "Nutritional and Functional Characteristics of
Whey Proteins in Food Products", Journal of Dairy Science 81: 597-608 (1998).
Beta-lactoglobulin is particularly rich in the essential amino acids valine and
threonine. Alpha-Lactalbumin is particularly rich in the essential amino acids
tryptophan, lysine and cystine compared to other bovine milk proteins, Jarvenpaa, A.
L, N. C. Raiha, et al., "Milk protein quantity and quality in the term infant. I. Metabolic
responses and effects on growth", Pediatrics 70(2): 214-20 (1982). As a
consequence of the differing amounts of the specific whey proteins in bovine milk
and human milk and the amino acid compositions of these proteins, bovine milk and
human milk differ substantially in their amino acid profiles, Rudloff, S. and C. Kunz,
"Protein and nonprotein nitrogen components in human milk, bovine milk, and infant
formula: quantitative and qualitative aspects in infant nutrition", J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr 24(3): 328-44 (1997). This difference remains in infant formulas
made with bovine whey in which the composition of the specific whey protein is not
modified.
As noted above, the elimination or reduction of beta-lactoglobulin in cow's
milk-based infant formula increases the content of alpha-Iactalbumin. Such a change
would subsequently increase the levels of the essential amino acids cystine,
tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine and reduce the level of the essential amino
acid threonine to levels that more closely resemble those in human milk. Therefore,
an improved amino acid composition would permit a reduction in the total protein
content of an infant formula.
DeWit, de Wit, J. N., "Nutritional and Functional Characteristics of Whey
Proteins in Food Products", Journal of Dairy Science 81: 597-608 (1998), describe
research activities focused on the fine-tuning of both milk protein and amino acid
composition and specifically on enriching bovine milk with alpha-Iactalbumin, beta-
casein and lactoferrin to achieve the optimal nutritional composition, particularly with
respect to the amino acid composition thereof. A nutritional composition is proposed
which comprises beta-lactoglobulin-depleted whey proteins, beta-casein and


lactofemin in desalted bovine milk permeate. It is postulated that such a preparation
will have a protein composition more closely approaching that of human milk than
existing infant formulas.
Dairy technology has focused on whey protein fractionation processes to
selectively remove substantially all the beta-lactoglobulin from whey or to isolate
enriched alpha-lactalbumin fractions substantially free of beta-lactoglobulin, for use in
foods, including infant formula. U.S. Patent No. 5,455,331 describes a process using
undefatted ultrafiltered whey to produce a material with a high alpha-lactalbumin
content and, on a total precipitable protein basis, less than 5% of beta-lactoglobulin.
The process involves heat precipitation of alpha-lactalbumin in undefatted
ultrafiltered cheese whey at a pH of 4.2. The alpha-lactalbumin-rich precipitate is
clarified, washed, neutralized, ultrafiltered and spray dried to yield a whey fraction,
the protein therein being predominantly alpha-lactalbumin, substantially depleted of
beta-lactoglobulin and including the lipid-containing components in the whey. U.S.
Patent No. 5,420,249 discloses the use of defatted whey and calcium-binding resin to
prepare whey for separation and a preferred alpha-lactalbumin fraction comprising at
least 60% of the protein as alpha-lactalbumin and at most 10% of the protein as beta-
lactoglobulin. They describe an alpha-lactalbumin-enriched fraction containing 13%
of the protein as beta-lactoglobulin. However, this fraction contained 74% of the
protein as alpha-lactalbumin, with a beta-lactoglobulin to alpha-lactalbumin ratio of
1:6. Other alpha-lactalbumin-enriched fractions had beta-lactoglobulin to alpha-
lactalbumin ratios of 1:4 to 1:7.
U.S. Patent No. 5,436,020 describes an infant formula devoid of untreated
cows' milk protein which is made with a material consisting of delactosed and
deionized whey permeate as a source of non-protein nitrogen combined with a
fractionated whey ultrafiltered to remove casein glycomacropeptides and fat. U.S.
Patent No. 5,169,666 describes treating bovine milk to eliminate or substantially
reduce the alpha-s-casein and to reduce the beta-lactoglobulin level to 4% or less as
a percentage of the protein, in order to make a 'humanized' bovine milk material for
infant "feeding.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to an infant formula composition which is
well-tolerated by infants. The infant formula composition of the present invention
comprises a whey fraction wherein 40% or less of the total protein in the whey
fraction is alpha-lactalbumin and more than 8% of the total protein in the whey
fraction is beta-lactoglobulin, with the proviso that the percentage of alpha-
lactalbumin is greater than the percentage of beta-lactoglobulin in the whey fraction.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is further directed to a nutritionally complete infant
formula comprising bovine milk in a quantity sufficient to provide about 1.0 to about
1.2 grams of protein per 100 available kilocalories and an amount of bovine whey
material sufficient to provide about 1.0 to about 1.2 grams of protein per 100
available kilocalories, the bovine whey material having an alpha-lactalbumin content
of between about 28% to about 40% and a beta-lactoglobulin content of between
about 8% to about 33% of total protein. Preferably, the whey material has an alpha-
lactalbumin content between about 28% to about 36% and a beta-lactoglobulin
content of between about 10% to about 29% of total protein. In the present formulas,
the percentage of alpha-lactalbumin in the whey fraction is greater than the
percentage of beta-lactoglobulin in the whey fraction. Preferably the beta-
lactoglobulin content in the whey fraction is not greater than the percentage of the
alpha-lactalbumin in the whey fraction minus 7%.
Preferably, the modified whey with specific amounts of alpha-lactabumin and
beta-lactoglobulin composition of the present invention has a non-protein nitrogen
content of about 15% or less of total nitrogen; a total protein content of between
about 12.5 to about 95%; a fat content of about 15% or less; and an ash content of
about 4.5% or less, all percentages on a w/w basis. Preferably, the total protein
content of the modified whey is between about 35% to about 80% and more
preferably about 73% to about 77%.


The bovine whey material utilized in the composition of the present invention
has a minimum amino acid content, in grams per 100 grams of total protein, as
follows: arginine 3.1; cystine 1.4; histidine 1.6; isoleucine 1.0; leucine 5.3; lysine 3.9;
methionine 0.3; phenylalanine 1.2; threonine 3.2; tryptophan 1.5; tyrosine 0.9; and
valine 1.0. Accordingly, it is not necessary that the infant formula of the present
invention contain added amino acids.
The present infant formula may be additionally formulated with other
nutritionally beneficial ingredients known in the art, e.g., oils providing longer chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid.
The present infant formula may further be formulated with vitamins, minerals,
selenium, natural carotenoids, nucleotides, taurine and other nutrients.
Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a nutritionally
complete infant formula composition containing 2.0 - 2.4 grams of protein per 100
available kilocalories, wherein the protein is comprised of substantially equal
amounts of protein from unmodified bovine milk and from a whey fraction, said whey
fraction being enriched with respect to alpha-lactalbumin.
The present infant formula may be prepared by blending appropriate
quantities of an alpha-lactalbumin-enriched whey protein concentrate with skimmed
milk, lactose, vegetable oils and fat soluble vitamins in deionized water. Preferably,
these materials are blended together in quantities sufficient to provide a final
concentration of approximately 240 grams/liter. Mineral salts may then be added to
the mixture prior to a high temperature/short time pasteurization step. Appropriate
mineral salts include calcium chloride, calcium carbonate, sodium citrate, potassium
hydroxide, potassium bicarbonate, magnesium chloride, ferrous sulfate, potassium
citrate, zinc sulfate, calcium hydroxide, copper sulfate, magnesium sulfate, potassium
iodide, sodium selenite, etc. The mixture is then homogenized and cooled. Heat-
labile vitamins and micronutrients may then be added to the mixture. The mixture is
then standardized with deionized water to a final total solids concentration of about
120 to about 135 and preferably about 123 grams per litre, which is equivalent to
about 670 kcal per litre. The formula may be sterilized using a conventional ultra-


high temperature or standard retort process. This sterilized material is then placed in
appropriate packaging.
It would be obvious to one skilled in the art that other known methods of
manufacture and sterilization can be used for the preparation of the present infant
formula. The present infant formula may also be produced as a concentrated liquid
product requiring dilution with an equal volume of water prior to feeding to an infant.
Furthermore such an infant formula may be dehydrated, such as in a spray dryer, to
create a stable infant formula powder that offers advantages of stability and economy
of transport, said powder requiring reconstitution with water prior to feeding to an
infant.
The infant formula of the present invention is advantageous in that it has an
amino acid profile composition that does not require addition of added essential
amino acids to meet or exceed European Union [Directive 91/321/EEC] standards for
amino acids in infant formula. Said amino acid profile permits a reduction in total
protein concentration to 2.1 grams per 100 available kilocalories, which is closer to
the total protein concentration in human milk. Another advantage is an infant
formula that exceeds the protein requirements of the U.S. Infant Formula Act. A
further advantage is an infant formula that contains the average amount of alpha-
lactalbumin as found in human milk. Yet a further advantage is an infant formula that
contains alpha-lactalbumin as the major whey protein. Yet another advantage is an
infant formula that contains long chain omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty
acids at nutritionally desirable levels.
Bovine milk is the basis for most infant formulas. Despite a total protein
concentration three times as high as that of human milk, bovine milk contains less
than half as much alpha-lactalbumin as human milk. Human milk does not contain
any beta-lactoglobulin. In contrast, beta-lactoglobulin is the most abundant whey
protein in bovine milk (Table 1).
Most current infant formulas made with unmodified bovine milk as the only
protein source contain about 15-16 g/L of protein, are casein-predominant and


contain only 0.5 g/L of alpha-lactalbumin (Table 1). Current infant formulas made with
whey protein unmodified with respect to protein composition contain 15 g/L of
protein. Demineralized whey supplies half of the protein in these infant formulas.
These infant formulas contain 1.2 g/L of alpha-lactalbumin, approximately half as
much as in an equal volume of human milk (Table 1).

EXAMPLE 1
A whey protein concentrate enriched with respect to alpha-lactalbumin but
containing a significant level of beta-lactoglobulin was prepared for use in the present
infant formulas. The concentrate had the following proximate and mineral
composition and whey protein proportions.



The proportions of alpha-lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin in the whey
protein fraction was measured after 2-Mercaptoethanol reduction using a GPC (gel
permeation chromatography) method with 6M Guanidine HCL as the mobile phase
and the solvent.
The chromatography column was packed with Progel TSK G3000 SW XL.
Two columns were arranged in series with a guard column of SW XL. The mobile
phase was prepared by dissolving 573.18g Guanidine HCI in 600mL of HPLC grade
water. Buffer stock, 100 mL, was added and the solution was heated and stirred to
achieve complete dissolution. The pH was adjusted to pH 7.5 with 50% sodium
hydroxide. After filtering, the solution was diluted to 1 liter. The buffer stock was
prepared by dissolving 56.6g Na2HP04, 3.5g NaH2PO4 and 2.9g ethylene diamine
tetraacetic acid in 1000 mL of HPLC grade water and adjusting to pH 7.5 with
hydrochloric acid.
The chromatography conditions included the following: Flow Rate, 0.5
mL/min; Run Time, 60 min; Injection Volume, 50 microliters; Temperature, Ambient;
and Detector, UV 280 nm.
Samples were prepared by weighing an amount equivalent to 10 mg of
protein into a 10 mL volumetric flask. The mobile phase was added to volume and
the flask was mixed well. The solution was sonicated for 20 minutes. About one

milliliter of the solution is transferred to an injection vial, 10 microliters of 2-
Mercaptoethanol are added and the solution is mixed on a vortex mixer for 10
seconds. The sample was then injected into the HPLC system.
Standards were prepared by weighing about 25 mg of bovine alpha-
Lactalbumin and beta-Lactoglobulin separately, and dissolving them with HPLC
grade water in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Calibration standard were prepared by
pipetting 1.0 mL of each standard into a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluting to
volume with the mobile phase. About one milliliter of each calibration standard
solution was transferred to an injection vial, 10 microliters of 2-Mercaptoethanol were
added and the solution was mixed with a vortex mixer for 10 seconds. The standard
sample was then injected into the HPLC system.
EXAMPLE 2
The whey protein concentrate of Example 1 was mixed with an amount of
skim milk containing an equal amount of protein to provide a ratio of whey proteins to
caseins of 60:40. Alpha-lactalbumin was found to be the dominant whey protein in
this protein mixture.
This protein mixture was used to prepare an improved infant formula with a
protein content lower than that in standard whey-based infant formula and closer to
that found in human milk. The protein content, whey protein content, alpha-
lactalbumin level and beta-lactoglobulin level of said infant formula are shown in
Table 3. The amount of alpha-lactalbumin in said infant formula was greater than the
amount of beta-lactoglobulin. The amount of alpha-lactalbumin in said infant formula
was essentially equal to the amount of alpha-lactalbumin in human milk.



Four batches of ready-to-feed liquid infant formulas incorporating this protein
mixture were manufactured in 4000-liter quantities in the following manner.
A fat blend for each batch was prepared by combining 43.54 kg of
randomized palm olein, 35.2 L of a high-oleic sunflower oil or safflower oil, 34.6 L of
coconut oil, 28.1 L of soybean oil, 1.36 kg of soy lecithin, 1.37 kg of distilled
monoglycerides, 1.19 kg of an oil containing 38% of its fatty acids as arachidonic acid
(ARASCO, Martek, Columbia, MD) and 0.74 kg of an oil containing 38% of its fatty
acids as docosahexaenoic acid (DHASCO, Martek, Columbia, MD).
The fat-soluble vitamins vitamin A (vitamin A palmitate and natural mixed
carotenoids), vitamin D (cholecalciferol), vitamin E (dl-alpha-tocopherol acetate) and
vitamin K (phytonadione) were then dispersed in the fat blend.
To produce a batch of the improved formula, an amount of heated liquid skim
milk or powdered skim milk sufficient to provide 28 kg of protein was added to warm
deionized water in a compounding tank to which had been added 723 g of sodium
citrate and 404g potassium bicarbonate dissolved in hot water. The fat blend was
metered into the compounding tank. The major dry ingredients, lactose and the whey
protein concentrate were added through a powder funnel eductor. The amount of
added whey protein concentrate varied according to its protein content and was
sufficient to provide 28 kg of protein. Taurine, 221 g was dissolved in hot water and
added to the compounding tank. The following minerals were dissolved or dispersed
separately in hot water and added to the compounding tank with intensive agitation:
calcium carbonate, 679 g; calcium hydroxide, 262 g; potassium hydroxide, 143 g;

magnesium chloride, 507 g; calcium chloride, 292 g; potassium chloride, 552 g;
ferrous sulfate, 151 g; potassium iodide, 31.6 g of a 1% triturate in lactose; 250 g of a
44.6% solution of zinc sulfate; 367 g of a 2.5% solution of copper sulfate; 5.08 g of a
2.5% solution of manganese sulfate, and 12.5 g of a 0.3% sodium selenite triturate in
potassium bicarbonate.
The mixture was heated to 96 ± 2°C, held for 30 seconds and then cooled to
66 ± 2°C. The mixture was then homogenized in a two-stage homogenizer, at 2500
psig in the first stage and 500 psig in the second stage. The homogenized mixture
was then cooled to 5 - 10°C using a plate heat exchanger.
A sample of the mixture was analyzed for fat, pH and total solids. An
appropriate amount of deionized water was added as required to achieve 80% of
total dilution and the batch was mixed. A sample was taken for analysis of total solids
and pH. The quantity of water required for final dilution was calculated. A portion of
this dilution water was used to dilute the nucleotides and water-soluble vitamins
before their addition to the mix. The following nucleotides were dissolved in warm
water and added to the mix: cytidine 5' monophosphate, 63.7 g; adenosine
5' monophosphate, 18.6 g; uridine 5' monophosphate, disodium salt, 32.4 g; inosine
5' monophosphate, disodium salt, 13.0 g; and guanosine 51 monophosphate,
disodium salt, 11.2g.
An appropriately formulated water-soluble vitamin premix was dissolved in
warm water and this solution was added to the mix. Choline chloride, 251 g, and
myo-inositol, 104 g, were dissolved in water and added to the mix. Ascorbic acid, 812
g, was dissolved in warm water and 462 g of potassium bicarbonate were added
slowly to neutralize the ascorbic acid. The neutral ascorbate solution was then added
to the mix. The mix was agitated for 30 minutes. The mix was standardized to total
solids of about 123 g per litre.
Twenty hours after the initial homogenization, the mix was homogenized
again and sterilized through a Stork UHT (ultra high temperature) aseptic
processing system and aseptically filled into 250-mL flexible containers.


CONTROL FORMULA
Control batches of ready-to-feed liquid infant formulas made with
demineralized whey (typically 13.5% protein, 85% lactose, fat 1%, and an ash
content of less than 1.5%) were manufactured in 4000-liter quantities in the following
manner. An amount of heated liquid skim milk sufficient to provide 30 kg of protein
was added to warm deionized water in a compounding tank to which had been added
sodium citrate and potassium citrate dissolved in hot water. The fat-soluble vitamin-
enriched fat blend was metered into the compounding tank. The major dry
ingredients, lactose and the demineralized whey, were added through a powder
funnel eductor. The amount of added demineralized whey varied according to its
protein content and was sufficient to provide 30 kg of protein. Taurine was dissolved
in hot water and added to the compounding tank. The following minerals were
dissolved or dispersed separately in hot water, and combined and added to the
compounding tank with intensive agitation: potassium bicarbonate, calcium chloride,
potassium chloride, sodium chloride, calcium citrate, ferrous sulfate, potassium
iodide, zinc sulfate, copper sulfate, manganese sulfate, and sodium selenite.
The control formula was heat treated, homogenized and supplemented with
nucleotides and a water-soluble vitamin premix in the same manner as the formula of
the present invention described above. The control formula mix was homogenized
again and sterilized through a Stork UHT (ultra high temperature) aseptic processing
system and filled into 250-mL flexible containers.
The major ingredients of the two formulas of this example are as follows:


The nutrient compositions of the present infant formula and the Control
Formula are set forth in Table 7.



The calcium and phosphorus levels in the present formula are closer than
standard formulas to the levels found in human milk. Human milk contains an
average of 254 mg/L of calcium and 139 mg/L of phosphorus.
EXAMPLE 3
Four individual batches of the infant formula according to the present
invention were produced. Each batch was analyzed for amino acid composition by
standard high performance liquid chromatography methods. The average levels of
amino acids essential for the human infant in the protein in the improved formula are

shown in Table 8. The present formula has an amino acid profile closer to that of
human milk than standard whey formulas (Table 8). The protein source of the
present formula is higher in tryptophan, lysine and cystine and is lower in threonine
than standard whey-based formulas.
The European Union (EU) has provided a specific human milk amino
composition to which formulas must be compared [Directive 91/321/EEC]. EU
requires amino acid composition must be 100% of EU human milk values on a
volume basis in mg/100 kcal. The factor used to convert mg/100 kcal to mg/L was
676 kcal/L
Table 8. Essential amino acid composition on a mg/L basis for improved formula,
human milk per European Union Annex V, and current whey-based formula.

The formula of the present invention contains a higher level of tryptophan, an
essential aromatic amino acid, than does human milk or current whey-based irifant
formula. Infants fed current infant formula often have plasma amino acid levels that
exceed the levels found in breast-fed infants with the exception of tryptophan.
Plasma tryptophan levels of formula-fed infants often are significantly lower than

those of breast-fed infants, Fazzolari-Nesci etal, "Tryptophan Fortification of Adapted
Formula Increasing Plasma Tryptophan Concentrations to Levels Not Different from
Those Found in Breast-Fed Infants," Journal of Ped. Gastro and Nut.. 14:456-459
(1992). Tryptophan is the precursor to the neurotransmitter serotonin, Femstrom et
al, "Brain Serotonin Content: Physiological Regulation by Plasma Neutral Amino
Acids," Science. 178: 414-415 (1972). Elevated serotonin levels are associated with
improved sleep latency (quicker onset of sleep). Tryptophan supplementation of
infants shortens the time to onset of sleep, Yogman et al, "Dietal Sleep Patterns In
Newborn Infants," New England Journal of Medicine. 309(19): 1147-9 (1983).
Tryptophan competes for the same transport system as large neutral amino
acids (LNAA). Thus, if relatively high concentrations of LNAA are present,
tryptophan is less efficiently transported across cells. In order to ensure optimal
transport of tryptophan across the intestine and also into the brain, a relatively high
tryptophan/LNAA ratio is desirable. Compared to current infant formula, the present
formula possesses a better tryptophan/LNAA ratio, ie, closer to that of human milk.
Cystine is a component of glutathione, a tripeptide with important metabolic
functions. Gluthathione is essential as an antioxidant and also in ensuring optimal
immune function. The present formula contains elevated cystine levels compared to
current whey- and casein-dominant formulas.
The amino acid composition of the present infant formula enables a reduction
in the total protein level to a level closer to human milk while complying with EU
amino acid requirements.
EXAMPLE 4
The improved formula and the control formula of Example 2 were evaluated in
a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, color-coded, parallel-group,
outpatient study in healthy, term infants. Infants were randomized to receive one of
the two formulas and were followed for 12 weeks.


Infants were healthy full-term infants with weights and lengths appropriate for
gestational age. Weight-for-length ratios were between the 10th and 90th percentiles
for age according to growth charts provided by the National Center for Health
Statistics (NCHS).
At enrollment, infants were no more than 14 days of age. Weight and length
were still between the 10th and 90lh percentiles for age according to the NCHS growth
charts. Infants were exclusively fed study infant formula.
Feeding of study formula began the day of the baseline visit. Of the 193
infants who entered the study, 98 infants received the infant formula of the present
invention and 95 infants received the control formula. An infant could be withdrawn
from the study for formula intolerance, for receiving non-study feedings for more than
5 consecutive days or more than 7 cumulative days, for receiving human milk, baby
food, or other solid foods, or for noncompliance with the study protocol. The
physician or the parent could withdraw an infant voluntarily at any time for any
reason.
Of the 98 infants assigned to the experimental formula, 72 (73.5%) completed
the study. Of the 95 infants assigned to the control formula, only 62 (65.3%)
completed the study. Eight infants (8.2%) in the experimental group and four infants
(4.2%) in the control group discontinued from the study because of protocol
violations. Five infants in the experimental group and four infants in the control group
discontinued because they failed to return. Of the remaining infants, 72, or 85%, of
the experimental group and 62, or 71%, of the control formula group completed the
study. More of the infants in the control group discontinued the study due to adverse
events (20/95 or 21%) than did those infants in the improved formula group (15/98 or
15.3%).



The primary efficacy measurements were infant weight (g), length (cm), and
head circumference (cm), which were recorded at baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, and
12. Assessments were to be done up to three days before enrollment, and within ±3
days of the other time points.
Baseline values for age, length, and head circumference were similar
between the two study groups. At baseline, mean ages were 1.0.1 days and 10.5
days, mean lengths were 51.5 cm and 51.3 cm, and mean head circumferences were
35.4 cm and 35.5 cm for the experimental and control groups, respectively. There
was a statistically significant difference in weight belween the two study groups at
baseline (p=0.04). Infants in the experimental group were slightly heavier, on
average, than infants in the control group (3536.4 g vs. 3458.5 g).
Both formulas were effective at promoting growth. Infants fed either study
formula grew to a similar extent during the study. After baseline, there were no

statistically significant differences between the formula groups on any of the growth
measures (weight, length, or head circumference). The anthropometric data showed
significant growth on all measures over a 12-week period, with the average infant
gaining approximately 2700 g of body weight, 10 cm in body length, and 5 cm in
head circumference. There was no statistically significant difference between the
groups fed the experimental and control formulas at Weeks 4, 8, or 12. Z-scores for
mean weight gain from baseline to week 12 were higher in the improved formula
group (+0.49) as compared to the control group (+0.183). The improved formula
group also had fewer non-study feedings than the control group (35.7% versus 42%,
respectively).
Adverse events and acceptability and tolerance of study formula were
recorded at visits at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 and by telephone contacts at Weeks 2, 6,
and 10. Assessments were done within 3 days before or after the time point.
Tolerance data were collected by interview. An adverse event was defined as any
untoward medical occurrence in an infant to whom a test article was administered in
a clinical investigation; the event did not necessarily have a causal relationship to the
test formula. An adverse event could be any unfavorable and unintended sign
(including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally
associated with the use of a study formula, whether or not it was considered related
to the study formula.
Less than half of the infants in the experimental and control groups had
adverse events considered to be formula-related (42 [42.9%] and 44 [46.3%].
respectively). The most common formula-related adverse events for all infants were
flatulence (34 infants), constipation (30 infants), and vomiting (26 infants). In both
groups, 17 infants had formula-related flatulence. Formula-related constipation
occurred more often in infants in the experimental group (19) than in infants in the
control group (11). Formula-related vomiting occurred in 12 infants in the
experimental formula group and in 14 infants in the control formula group. Twice as
many infants in the control group as in the experimental group experienced formula-
related diarrhea (8 vs. 4).


No infants in the present formula group had formula-related adverse events of
the respiratory system, and three infants (3.2%) in the control group had such events.
Overall, the adverse event profiles of the two study formulas were similar.
Protein status (serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine)
were secondary safety endpoints measured at baseline and at Week 12. The
present formula group was fed a lower protein quantity (1.4 grams Protein/100 mL)
than the control group (1.5 grams Protein/100 mL). Both study groups had a similar
adequate protein status at the 12-week end of the study as defined by serum albumin
levels (4.1 mg/dl in both groups). Comparable growth and serum albumin status
indicate adequate protein nutrition from the alpha-lactalbumin rich formula despite
lower total protein content. At study completion, the experimental group had lower
BUN levels than the control group (8.2mg/dl vs. 9.3 mg/dl), indicating a high quality
protein source and reduced need for excess protein removal.
Acceptability and tolerance data are summarized in Table 22. Both the
experimental and control formulas were acceptable and well tolerated by most of the
infants at all study time points. At all time points after Week 2, acceptability and
tolerance were slightly greater in infants who received the present formula. The
percentage of infants whose overall acceptability and tolerance of study formula was
satisfactory ranged from 90% at Week 2 to 100% at Weeks 10 and 12 for infants who
received the improved formula and ranged from 85.9% at Week 4 to 98.4% at Week
10 for infants who received the control formula. Unacceptable ratings ranged from 0-
10% in the improved formula group (average 4.1%) and from 1.6-14.1% in the control
group (average 7.0%). The data indicates that the improved formula provides
enhanced protein nutrition and formula acceptability.



The present invention may be embodied on other specific forms without
departing for the spirit and essential attributes thereof and accordingly, reference
should be made to the appended claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as
indicating the scope of the invention.

WE CLAIM.
1. An infant formula composition comprising a whey fraction wherein 40% or
less of the total protein in said whey fraction is alpha-lactalbumin and more than 8%
of the total protein in said whey fraction is beta-lactoglobulin, with the proviso that the
percentage of alpha-lactalbumin in said whey fraction is greater than the percentage
of beta-lactoglobulin in said whey fraction.
2. An infant formula composition comprising an amount of bovine milk providing
1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per 100 available kilocalories and an amount of a bovine
whey material providing 1.0 to 1.2 grams of protein per 100 available kilocalories,
said bovine whey material having an alpha-lactalbumin content of 28% to 40% and a
beta-lactoglobulin content of 8% to 33% of total protein.
3. The infant formula composition of claim 2, wherein said bovine whey material
has an alpha-lactalbumin content of 28% to 36% and a beta-lactoglobulin content of
10% to 29% of total protein.
4. The infant formula composition of claim 2, wherein said bovine whey material
is further characterized by:

(a) a non-protein nitrogen content of 15% or less of total nitrogen;
(b) a total protein content of 12.5% to 95%;
(c) a fat content of 15% or less; and
(d) an ash content of 4.5% or less.

5. The infant formula composition of claim 4, wherein said bovine whey material
has a total protein content of 35% to 80%.
6. The infant formula composition of claim 5, wherein said bovine whey material
has a total protein content of 73% to 77%.


7. The infant formula composition of claim 2, said bovine whey material being
further characterized by amino acid contents of no less than the following, in grams
per 100 grams of total protein:
(a) Arginine, 3.1;
(b) Cystine, 1.4;
(c) Histidine, 1.6;
(d) Isoleucine, 1.0;
(e) Leucine, 5.3;
(f) Lysine , 3.9;
(g) Methionine, 0.3;
(h) Phenylalanine, 1.2
(i) Threonine, 3.2;
(j) Tryptophan, 1.5;
(k) Tyrosine, 0.9; and
(I) Valine , 1.0.

8. An infant formula composition which is well tolerated and acceptable to the
infants to which it is fed comprising a whey fraction wherein 40% or less of the total
protein in said whey fraction is alpha-lactalbumin and more than 8% of the total
protein in said whey fraction is beta-lactoglobulin, with the proviso that the
percentage of alpha-lactalbumin in said whey fraction is greater than the percentage
of beta-lactoglobulin in said whey fraction.
9. The infant formula composition of claim 2, wherein the dominant whey protein
is alpha-lactalbumin.
10. The infant formula composition of claim 2, wherein the amount of alpha-
lactalbumin is no less than 2.2 grams per 670 available kilocalories (0.33g/100 kcal).
11. A method of feeding an infant, comprising feeding a nutritionally sufficient
amount of the infant formula of claim 1 to an infant less than one year of age.
12. The infant formula composition of claim 1, which also comprises bovine milk
protein in an amount such that the ratio of whey proteins to caseins is 60 to 40 by
weight.
Dated this 17th day of July 2008.

An infant formula composition is provided comprising a whey fraction wherein 40% or less of the total protein in said
fraction is alpha-lactalbumin and more than 8% of the total protein in said whey fraction is beta-lectoglobulin, with the proviso that
the percentage of alpha-lactalbumin in said whey fraction is greater than the percentage of beta-lactoglobulin in said whey fraction.

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2913-KOLNP-2008-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2017-10-10
1 2913-KOLNP-2008-TRANSLATED COPY OF PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf 2011-10-07
2 2913-KOLNP-2008-FORM 3-1.1.pdf 2011-10-07
2 2913-KOLNP-2008_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
3 2913-kolnp-2008-form 18.pdf 2011-10-07
3 2913-KOLNP-2008-(05-08-2015)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2015-08-05
4 2913-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.2.pdf 2011-10-07
4 2913-kolnp-2008-(05-11-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2014-11-05
5 2913-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.1.pdf 2011-10-07
5 2913-kolnp-2008-(05-11-2014)-OTHERS.pdf 2014-11-05
6 2913-KOLNP-2008-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2011-10-07
6 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-11-14
7 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-11-14
7 02913-kolnp-2008-gpa.pdf 2011-10-07
8 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf 2013-11-14
8 02913-kolnp-2008-form 5.pdf 2011-10-07
9 02913-kolnp-2008-form 3.pdf 2011-10-07
9 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-ANNEXURE TO FORM 3.pdf 2013-11-12
10 02913-kolnp-2008-form 2.pdf 2011-10-07
10 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-CLAIMS.pdf 2013-11-12
11 02913-kolnp-2008-form 1.pdf 2011-10-07
11 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-11-12
12 02913-kolnp-2008-description complete.pdf 2011-10-07
12 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf 2013-11-12
13 02913-kolnp-2008-correspondence others.pdf 2011-10-07
13 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-11-12
14 02913-kolnp-2008-claims.pdf 2011-10-07
14 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-2.pdf 2013-11-12
15 02913-kolnp-2008-abstract.pdf 2011-10-07
15 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-11-12
16 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-OTHERS.pdf 2013-11-12
16 2913-KOLNP-2008-(16-05-2013)-OTHERS.pdf 2013-05-16
17 2913-KOLNP-2008-(16-05-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-05-16
17 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-11-12
18 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2013-07-04
18 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-07-04
19 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-07-04
19 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-6.pdf 2013-07-04
20 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-07-04
20 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-07-04
21 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-13.pdf 2013-07-04
21 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-07-04
22 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-2.pdf 2013-07-04
23 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-13.pdf 2013-07-04
23 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-07-04
24 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-07-04
24 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-07-04
25 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-FORM-6.pdf 2013-07-04
25 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-07-04
26 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2013-07-04
26 2913-KOLNP-2008-(04-07-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-07-04
27 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-11-12
27 2913-KOLNP-2008-(16-05-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-05-16
28 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-OTHERS.pdf 2013-11-12
28 2913-KOLNP-2008-(16-05-2013)-OTHERS.pdf 2013-05-16
29 02913-kolnp-2008-abstract.pdf 2011-10-07
29 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-11-12
30 02913-kolnp-2008-claims.pdf 2011-10-07
30 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-2.pdf 2013-11-12
31 02913-kolnp-2008-correspondence others.pdf 2011-10-07
31 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-11-12
32 02913-kolnp-2008-description complete.pdf 2011-10-07
32 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-DESCRIPTION (COMPLETE).pdf 2013-11-12
33 02913-kolnp-2008-form 1.pdf 2011-10-07
33 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-11-12
34 02913-kolnp-2008-form 2.pdf 2011-10-07
34 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-CLAIMS.pdf 2013-11-12
35 02913-kolnp-2008-form 3.pdf 2011-10-07
35 2913-KOLNP-2008-(12-11-2013)-ANNEXURE TO FORM 3.pdf 2013-11-12
36 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-PETITION UNDER RULE 137.pdf 2013-11-14
36 02913-kolnp-2008-form 5.pdf 2011-10-07
37 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-11-14
37 02913-kolnp-2008-gpa.pdf 2011-10-07
38 2913-KOLNP-2008-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2011-10-07
38 2913-KOLNP-2008-(14-11-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-11-14
39 2913-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.1.pdf 2011-10-07
39 2913-kolnp-2008-(05-11-2014)-OTHERS.pdf 2014-11-05
40 2913-KOLNP-2008-CORRESPONDENCE-1.2.pdf 2011-10-07
40 2913-kolnp-2008-(05-11-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2014-11-05
41 2913-kolnp-2008-form 18.pdf 2011-10-07
41 2913-KOLNP-2008-(05-08-2015)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2015-08-05
42 2913-KOLNP-2008-FORM 3-1.1.pdf 2011-10-07
42 2913-KOLNP-2008_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
43 2913-KOLNP-2008-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2017-10-10
43 2913-KOLNP-2008-TRANSLATED COPY OF PRIORITY DOCUMENT.pdf 2011-10-07