DESC:FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an insecticidal compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and formulation thereof and to a method of controlling undesired insects-pests in economically important crops.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In the actual process of agricultural production, crops encounters different pests and diseases in each period. For example in tomato, chilli, cotton etc there are common pests such as whitefly, aphids, leaf miner, cotton bollworm, and Spodoptera litura observed. These pests often occur as a mixture of two, three, or even four pests.
Pests that occur in the above-mentioned mixtures are usually not of the same species, and they have their own morphological structures, living habits and damage characteristics. For example, aphids, thrips, planthoppers, etc. are small in size, large in reproduction, strong in concealment, and harmful by stabbing, and require systemic and long-lasting agents; pupae, beet armyworm, cotton bollworm, and Spodoptera litura Pests such as Lepidoptera, which are harmful to chewing, need to be contacted or have strong stomach toxicity; while leaf miners and pupae, etc., also drill and pupate to damage the crop mesophylls or rods, and need systemic or penetrating agents.
Broad-spectrum insecticides such as organophosphorus, pyrethrin and carbamate agents were once the first choice for controlling mixed pests but researchers has found that a large number of these agents alone have very obvious resistance and greatly reduced activity, and most of the broad-spectrum agents have a high lethality to beneficial organisms. The ecological balance of the entire field or vegetable garden has been significantly affected and damaged. However, most of the agents used at this stage are highly selective agents, and a single application can only control a part of multiple pests that occur in a mixed manner. When multiple pests are occur in a mixed manner, multiple applications are required, which greatly increases treatment and labor costs.
It is a common method at the present stage to control the occurrence of mixed pests by using a suitable compounding agents. After compounding different active ingredients and assessing their bio-efficacy over existing compositions one can expect the expansion in control spectrum, reduce the use of pesticides, reduce dosage, reduce treatment cost, reduce the risk of resistance and reduce environmental pollution.
Therefore compositions of different active compounds having different mode of action to address the problem of occurrence of mixed insects is desired. However owing to the large number of possible influencing factors, there is virtually no individual active compound and combinations which has all the desired properties for different requirements, in particular with respect to the species of insects, crops and the climatic zones. Furthermore, there is the permanent objective to achieve the desired effect using more and more reduced insecticides application rates. A lower application rate reduces not only the amount of active compound required for the application, but generally also reduces the amount of formulation auxiliaries required, these both able to reduce the economic expense and improve ecological compatibility of the insecticides treatment. Further, when two or more active compounds are applied in combination, it is not uncommon for phenomena of physical and biological incompatibility to occur, for example insufficient stability of a joint formulation, decomposition of an active compound or antagonism of the active compounds. What is desired are, in contrast, active compound combinations having a favorable activity profile, high stability and enhanced activity, thus permitting the application rate to be reduced, compared with the individual application of the active compounds to be combined. Therefore, there is still a need for a combinations of carefully selected insecticide compounds, which can meet the above said requirements.
In order to solve the above-mentioned technical problems, the inventors of present invention have unexpectedly found through a large number of bioassays and screenings that compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen provides excellent field control effect on a wide spectrum of insect in low dose rate, is highly stable, non-phytotoxic and cost effective.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides a insecticidal compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In one aspect, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprises first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate in an amount in the range from 5-35% w/w and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts in an amount in the range from 0.1-3 % w/w and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Dinotefuran in an amount in the range from 1-5% w/w or Flonicamid in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Flubendiamide in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin in an amount in the range from 0.1-5% w/w or Novaluron in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Profenofos in an amount in the range from 10-30% w/w or Pymetrozine in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in an amount in the range from 1-15% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In one aspect, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprises first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate in an amount in the range from 15-25% w/w and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts in an amount in the range from 0.4-1.1% w/w and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole in an amount in the range from 2.6-5% w/w or Dinotefuran in an amount in the range from 1.4-2.7% w/w or Flonicamid in an amount in the range from 3.4-6.6% w/w or Flubendiamide in an amount in the range from 3-5% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin in an amount in the range from 1-3.4% w/w or Novaluron in an amount in the range from 6.5-9% w/w or Profenofos in an amount in the range from 18.5-23% w/w or Pymetrozine in an amount in the range from 6-9% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in an amount in the range from 4.4-8.6% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In another aspect, the present invention provides a process of preparation of the insecticidal compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an aspect, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) or any other formulation suitable for combinations.
In another aspect, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable excipients selected from the group comprising of dispersing agent(s), wetting agent(s), emulsifier (s), dispersing cum wetting agent(s), disintegrating agent(s), anti-freeze agent(s), anti-settling agent (s), capsule forming monomer I and II, defoaming agent(s) / defoamer(s) / antifoaming agent(s) / antifoamer(s), biocide(s)/preservative(s), viscosity modifier(s)/ rheology modifier(s)/ thickener(s), solvent(s), filler(s), diluent(s) or a combination thereof and other excipients as will be required in a particular type of formulation.
In another aspect, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprises;
the dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising sodium salts of naphthalene sulfonates condensed with formaldehyde, ligno-sulphonate, sodium lignosulphonate, modified sodium lignosulphonate, sodium polycarboxylate, high molecular weight purified sodium ligno-sulphonate, modified styrene acrylic polymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, tristyrylphenol ethoxylates, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 20% w/w;

the wetting agent is selected from the group comprising sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium alkyl dibutyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium butyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 10% w/w;
the emulsifier is selected from the group comprising tristyrylphenol ethoxylated, calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate, non-ionic ethopropoxylated polyarylphenol, blend of non-ionic and anionic emulsifier (proprietary blend), castor oil ethoxylates or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 30% w/w;

the dispersing cum wetting agent is selected from the group comprising Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s Jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene, sulphate formaldehyde condensate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 2 to 10% w/w;

the disintegrating agent is selected from the group comprising ammonium sulphate, lactose or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 10-30% w/w;

the anti-freezing agent is selected from the group comprising glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol or a combinations thereof, and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 10% w/w;
the anti-settling agent is selected from the group comprising precipitated silica, organic bentonite, polyolefin particles and fumed silica and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 7% w/w;
the capsule forming monomer I is selected from the group comprising polyisocyanate, toluene di-isocyanate and tri-isocyanate present in an amount in the range from 0.5 to 3% w/w;

the capsule forming monomer II is selected from the group comprising ethylenediamine, diethylenetetramine and hexaethylenediamine present in an amount in the range from 0.2 to 2% w/w;

the antifoamer/defoamer is selected from the group comprising polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 3% w/w;

the biocide/preservative is selected from the group comprising 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1, 2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, isothiazolinone or a combinations thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.01 to 1% w/w;

the thickener is selected from the group comprising xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 0.5% w/w;
the solvent is selected from the group comprising solvent C-9, high solvency C-11 aromatic fluid, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), dipropylene glycol methyl ether or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 1-25% w/w or the first solvent is present in an amount 1-25% w/w and second solvent is present in an amount quantity sufficient;
the filler is selected from the group comprising silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth or a combination thereof and present in an amount quantity sufficient, provided when filler combinations is used then first filler is present in an amount in the range from 1-20% w/w and second filler is present in an amount quantity sufficient; and
the diluent is demineralised water and present in an amount quantity sufficient.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The definitions provided herein for the terminologies used in the present disclosure are for illustrative purpose only and in no manner limit the scope of the present invention disclosed in the present disclosure.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although other methods and materials similar, or equivalent, to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention, the preferred materials and methods are described herein.
It is to be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein, the terms "comprises", "comprising", "includes", "including", “has”, “having”, “contains”, “containing”, “characterized by” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, subject to any limitation explicitly indicated. For example, a composition, mixture, process or a method that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such composition, mixture, process or method.
The transitional phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step or ingredient not specified. If in the claim, such would close the claim to the inclusion of materials other than those recited except for impurities ordinarily associated therewith. When the phrase “consisting of” appears in a clause of the body of a claim, rather than immediately following the preamble, it limits only the element set forth in that clause; other elements are not excluded from the claim as a whole.
As used herein, the terms “composition” or “compositions” or "formulation" or "formulations" or “combination” or “combinations” can be used interchangeably, unless stated otherwise, is meant to encompass, and are not limited to, compositions or formulations containing the combination of first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen.
As used herein, the term “agriculturally acceptable excipient (s)” refers to inert substances and are auxiliary substances added to the processing or use of pesticide preparations and used to improve the physical and chemical properties of formulations. The auxiliaries themselves are essentially free of biological activity, but can affect the control effect.
The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w/w” or “%” means the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solute on or composition unless otherwise specified.
The term “active ingredient” (a.i.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the composition responsible for control of insects-pests in crops of useful plants.
As used herein, the term "effective amount" means the amount of the active substances in the compositions to achieve an observable effect on death, retardation, prevention, and removal, destruction, or otherwise diminishing the occurrence and activity of the target pests. An effective amount of the compositions will also vary according to the prevailing conditions such as desired insecticidal effect and duration, weather, target pests and species, target crops, locus, mode of application, and the like.
As used herein, the term “insecticide”, refers to any chemical substance used to destroy/kill, inhibit or otherwise adversely affect the insect-pests. For the avoidance of doubt the insecticides used in the present invention encompasses its agrochemically acceptable salt(s), acid(s), ester(s), racemic or enantiomer form(s), derivative(s) or any other modified forms if available for that insecticides compounds.

As used herein, “2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate” is commonly known as “Fenobucarb”. Fenobucarb is a non-systemic insecticide which acts as a cholinesterase inhibitor and is mainly used for the control of leafhopper, plant hoppers, thrips, jassids on cotton, rice, paddy, tea, sugarcane, wheat, cucurbits etc. For the avoidance of doubt and for ease herein below the term Flonicamid is used for “2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate”.
As used herein, Emamectin or its salts belongs to the class of avermectin insecticides and is produced by bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis and is effective against many lepidopteran pest and thrips. It acts by stimulating the release of gamma-aminobutyric acid, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, thus finally activating chloride channels. It is a non-systemic insecticide which penetrates leaf tissues by translaminar movement.
As used herein, “Chlorantraniliprole” acts by activation of ryanodine receptors, leading to loss of internal calcium stores. It is used for control of wide range of chewing pests primarily Lepidoptera, in a broad range of crops including fruit, vegetables, vines, cotton, sugarcane, rice and grass.
As used herein, “Dinotefuran” is an agonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, affecting the synapses in the insect central nervous system. It is a systemic insecticide with translaminar activity and with contact and stomach action. It controls sucking insects, such as aphids, jassids, whiteflies, thrips and leaf miner in vegetables, fruit, paddy and other crops.
As used herein, “Flonicamid” acts by inhibiting feeding and has systemic and translaminar activity. It is used to control jassids, aphids and other sucking pests in fruit, cereals, potatoes, cotton, tea and vegetables.
As used herein, “Flubendiamide” activates the ryanodine receptor, a calcium release channel which is involved in muscle contraction. It is activated by ingestion. It is used for controlling wide range of lepidopterous insects in maize, cotton, tobacco, pome and stone fruit, nuts, grapes, rice, turf and vegetables.
As used herein, “Lambda-cyhalothrin” is a non-systemic insecticide with contact and stomach action, and repellent properties. It acts on the nervous system of insects and disturbs the function of neurons by interaction with sodium channel. It controls aphids, jassids, thrips, lepidoptera larvae and other insects etc in cereals, ornamentals, vegetables, cotton and other crops.
As used herein “Novaluron” acts as a chitin synthesis inhibitor and absorbed mainly by ingestion but shows some contact activity also. It is effective against larvae, eggs of some species and in some cases reduces fecundity.
As used herein, “Profenofos” is a cholinesterase inhibitor and used to control insects such as flies, mites, aphids and few leps on cotton, maize, sugar, soybeans, vegetables, tobacco and other crops.
As used herein, “Pymetrozine” is a selective against Homoptera, causing them to stop feeding. It provides control of aphids, whiteflies and hoppers in vegetables, ornamental, cotton, fruit and rice.
As used herein, “Pyriproxyfen” belongs to the class of juvenile hormone mimic. It acts as an insect juvenile hormone analogue that inhibits insect maturation processes. It controls whitefly and thrips.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a insecticidal compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprises first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate in an amount in the range from 5-35% w/w and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts in an amount in the range from 0.1-3 % w/w and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Dinotefuran in an amount in the range from 1-5% w/w or Flonicamid in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Flubendiamide in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin in an amount in the range from 0.1-5% w/w or Novaluron in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Profenofos in an amount in the range from 10-30% w/w or Pymetrozine in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in an amount in the range from 1-15% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In an embodiment, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprises first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate in an amount in the range from 15-25% w/w and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts in an amount in the range from 0.4-1.1% w/w and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole in an amount in the range from 2.6-5% w/w or Dinotefuran in an amount in the range from 1.4-2.7% w/w or Flonicamid in an amount in the range from 3.4-6.6% w/w or Flubendiamide in an amount in the range from 3-5% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin in an amount in the range from 1-3.4% w/w or Novaluron in an amount in the range from 6.5-9% w/w or Profenofos in an amount in the range from 18.5-23% w/w or Pymetrozine in an amount in the range from 6-9% w/w or Pyriproxyfen in an amount in the range from 4.4-8.6% w/w; and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).
In another embodiment, the compositions of the present invention can be prepared into any dosage form suitable for agricultural use by known methods. The insecticidal compositions of the present invention are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) or any other formulation suitable for combinations.
In one other embodiment, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprise one or more agriculturally acceptable excipients selected from the group comprising of dispersing agent(s), wetting agent(s), emulsifier (s), dispersing cum wetting agent(s), disintegrating agent(s), anti-freeze agent(s), anti-settling agent (s), capsule forming monomer I and II, defoaming agent(s) / defoamer(s) / antifoaming agent(s) / antifoamer(s), biocide(s)/preservative(s), viscosity modifier(s)/ rheology modifier(s)/ thickener(s), solvent(s), filler(s), diluent(s) or a combination thereof and other excipients as will be required in a particular type of formulation.
The compositions of present invention uses dispersing agents to prevent agglomeration of solid particles and keep them suspended in fluid. Non-limiting examples of dispersing agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to sodium salts of naphthalene sulfonates condensed with formaldehyde, ligno-sulphonate, sodium lignosulphonate, modified sodium lignosulphonate, sodium polycarboxylate, high molecular weight purified sodium ligno-sulphonate, modified styrene acrylic polymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, tristyrylphenol ethoxylates, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene oxide graft copolymer, sodium salt of naphthalene sulfonate condensate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, blend of acrylic graft copolymer and emulsifier, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate, anionic tristyrylphenol phosphate surfactant, non-ionic surfactant, polyalkoxylated butyl ether dispersant, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate condensate, sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium alkylnaphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric dispersant, modified styrene acrylic polymeric aqueous dispersant, proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulphate formaldehyde condensate, lignosulfonic acid dispersant, kraft lignosulfonate with a low degree sulfonation, naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, mixture of salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid and phenol, alkyl naphthalene sulfonate sodium salt, modified naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonated kraft lignin, naphthalene sulfonate phenol condensate, sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulfonate. One or more dispersing agents may be used in the compositions of the present invention. The dispersing agent is present in an amount in the range from 0.1-20% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses wetting agent to facilitate the process of dispersion of the granules in the liquid. Non-limiting examples of wetting agents that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium alkyl dibutyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium butyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether, branched short chain alcohol ethoxylate wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate with an anionic blend, polyalkylene glycol ether, EO/PO block co-polymer, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether wetter, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate blend with a anionic blend, nonionic proprietary surfactant blend, sulphonated anionic wetter, copolymer condensate of ethylene and propylene oxide, sodium alkyl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, comb-type polymeric surfactant, polyalkylene oxide block copolymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, dibutyl naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, dialkyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate. One or more wetting agents may be used in the compositions of the present invention. The wetting agents is present in an amount in the range from 0.1-10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention also uses emulsifier. An emulsifier is a kind of surfactant. It helps to prevent the droplets of the dispersed phase of an emulsion from flocculating or coalescing in the emulsion. It can be or include a cationic, zwitterionic or a non-ionic emulsifier. Suitable emulsifier used herein, but not limited to, tristyrylphenol ethoxylated, calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate, non-ionic ethopropoxylated polyarylphenol, blend of non-ionic and anionic emulsifier (proprietary blend), castor oil ethoxylates, polyethylene oxide block copolymer, high molecular weight polymer (polyvinyl alcohol), PEG-10 PPG-5 cetyl phosphate, ethylene oxide (EO) - polyethylene oxide (PO) block copolymer, tristyryl phenol, ethoxylated nonionic emulsifier. One or more emulsifier may be used in the compositions of the present invention. The emulsifier is present in an amount in the range from 1 to 30% w/w;
The compositions of present invention also uses dispersing cum wetting agent. Non-limiting examples of dispersing cum wetting agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to Jeemox SCR, Jeemox 1269 (Proprietary blend of m/s Jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene, sulphate formaldehyde condensate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, highly sulfonation and low molecular weight kraft lignin polymer, sodium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, ammonium salt of aromatic ring surfactant, sodium salt of naphthalene sulphonic acid condensation, proprietary blend of anionic surfactant, proprietary blend of polymeric surfactant, sodium methyl oleoyl taurate, tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate ester. One or more dispersing cum wetting agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Dispersing cum wetting agent is present in an amount in the range from 2-10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention also uses disintegrating agent that can swell or disintegrate the composition. Non-limiting examples of disintegrating agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to, ammonium sulphate, lactose. One or more disintegrating agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Disintegrating agent is present in an amount in the range from 10-30% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses anti-freeze agent which are used to prevent deleterious effects due to freezing and lyophilization (lyophilisation). Non-limiting examples of anti-freeze agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol. One or more anti-freeze agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Anti-freeze agent is present in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses anti-settling agent. Non-limiting examples of anti-freeze agent that can be used in the present invention include, but not limited to precipitated silica, organic bentonite, polyolefin particles and fumed silica and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 7% w/w;
The composition of the present invention also comprises of capsule forming monomer I and II. The capsule forming monomer I is selected from polyisocyanate, toluene di-isocyante and triisocyanate present in an amount in the range from 0.5 to 3% w/w; and the capsule forming monomer II is selected from ethylenediamine, diethylenetetramine and hexaethylenediamine present in an amount in the range from 0.2 to 2% w/w.
The composition of present invention also uses defoaming agent. The term “defoaming agent(s)” or “defoamer(s)” or “antifoaming agent(s)” “antifoamer(s)” refers to a chemical additive that reduces and hinders the formation of foam in liquid, semi-solid, or solid formulations. The terms defoaming agent and anti-foaming agent can be used interchangeably. Suitable defoamer used herein, but not limited to, polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion, organic fluorine compounds. One or more defoaming agent may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Defoaming agent is present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 3% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses biocide/preservatives to prevent the composition from spoilage due to bacteria, yeasts and fungi or deterioration due to undesirable chemical changes. Suitable biocide/preservative used herein, but not limited to 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1, 2- benzisothiazolin-3-one, (commonly known as Benzisothiazolin-3-one), formaldehyde, potassium sorbate, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid esters, 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one. One or more biocide/preservatives may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Biocide/preservatives is present in an amount in the range from 0.01 to 1% w/w.
The compositions of present invention uses thickener which are usually polymeric material, and at a low concentration increases the viscosity of an aqueous solution and helps to stabilize the composition. Suitable thickener used herein, but not limited to xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon. Xanthan gum used in the present invention is obtained from a commercial source. One or more thickener may be used in the compositions of the present invention. Thickener is present in an amount in the range from 0.1-5% w/w.
The solvent used in the compositions of present invention is selected from the group comprising of water; alcohols such as ethanol, propanol, butan-1-ol, n-octanol, isopropanol ethylene glycol, iethylene glycol, propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, glycerine; polyol ethers such as ethylene glycol monopropyl ether, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether; ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, cyclohexanone; ethers such as dipropyl ether, dioxane, tetrahydrofuran; aliphatic hydrocarbons such as normal paraffin, isoparaffin, kerosene, mineral oil; aromatic hydrocarbons such as xylene, toluene, naphthalene, solvent naphtha, solvent C9, solvent C10, high solvency C-11 aromatic fluid, solvent C12, solvesso 100, solvesso 150, solvesso 200; chlorinated aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons such as chlorobenzene, chloroethylene, methylene chloride; esters such as ethyl acetate, diisopropyl phthalate, dimethyl adipate, methyl oleate, methyl tallowate; lactones such as gammabutyrolactone; amides such as dimethylformamide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, Noctylpyrolidone, decanamide, N,N-dimethyldecanamide; nitriles such as acetonitrile; organosulfur compound such as dimethyl sulfoxide. The solvent may be used alone or in combination and is present in an amount in the range from 1-25% w/w or the first solvent is present in an amount 1-25% w/w and second solvent is present in an amount quantity sufficient.
The compositions of present invention uses filler. Suitable fillers that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include, but not limited to, silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth or a combination thereof and present in an amount quantity sufficient, provided when filler combinations is used then first filler is present in an amount in the range from 1-20% w/w and second filler is present in an amount quantity sufficient to make 100% w/w formulation.
The compositions of present invention uses diluents. Suitable diluents that may be used in the composition of the present invention is demineralised water and present in an amount quantity sufficient to make 100% w/w formulation.
The compositions of the present invention is found to be effective to control wide spectrum of insect pests from the orders of Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Acarina, Thysanoptera, particularly the compositions of present invention gave excellent control on shoots and fruits borer, jassids, aphid, whitefly, mites, thrips, plant hoppers and leaf miner. Further the compositions of the present invention may be used to control variety of insect pests in cereals, paddy/rice, pulses, oilseeds, cotton, fibre crops, vegetables, fruit crops, plantations and spice crops, particularly the compositions of present invention tested on cotton, rice, vegetables and gave significantly better results compared to solo and binary compositions.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process of preparation of the insecticidal compositions comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s).

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a SC formulations which comprises: a) diluting and solubilizing a biocide, defoamer and antifreeze agent in demineralised water in a mixing vessel and adding dispersing and wetting agent under stirring to get homogeneous mixture; b) adding active ingredients one by one under stirring and mixing till homogeneous slurry obtained; c) wet grinding at suitable temperature till desired particle size obtained, and d) adding previously prepared viscosity modifier solution and stirring to obtain SC formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a WDG formulations which comprises: a) mixing the precipitate silica and first active ingredient b) adding remaining active ingredients and other excipients to prepare homogenous mixture of all ingredients; c) milling and grinding till desired particle size; c) preparing dough; d) extruding the granules and drying to obtain the water dispersible granules formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a SE formulations which comprises: a) mixing the solvent, emulsifier and first active ingredient to obtain homogeneous solution; b) if required mixing the solvent and second active ingredient to obtain homogeneous solution; c) if step b) performed then mixing solution of step a) and step b); d) diluting and solubilizing a biocide, defoamer and antifreeze agent in demineralised water in a mixing vessel and adding dispersing and wetting agent and remaining active ingredients under stirring to get homogeneous mixture; e) adding the step c) to step d) mix; f) milling and grinding till desired particle size; g) adding previously prepared viscosity modifier solution and stirring to obtain SE Formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a ME formulations which comprises: a) solubilizing the third active ingredient in solvent 2; b) solubilizing the second active ingredient in solvent 1; c) mixing the step a) and b) and adding the first active ingredient and emulsifier under stirring to obtain ME formulations.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of EC formulations which comprises: a) solubilizing first active ingredients in diluents; b) solubilizing second active ingredient in solvent; c) mixing step a) and b) and add emulsifiers in it to obtain EC formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of EW formulations which comprises: a) solubilizing second active ingredients in solvent; b) solubilizing third active ingredient in another solvent; c) mixing step a) and b) and add first active ingredient in it to obtain homogenous solution and then adding emulsifier; d) diluting and solubilizing a biocide, defoamer and antifreeze agent in demineralised water in a mixing vessel; e) adding solvent phase into water phase; e) stirring the mixture in homogenizer; f) adding previously prepared viscosity modifier solution and stirring to obtain EW formulation.

In an embodiment, the present invention provides a process for the preparation of ZW formulations which comprises EW phase: Preparing solvent phase: a) solubilizing second active ingredients in solvent; b) solubilizing first active ingredient in another solvent; c) adding emulsifier into it; Preparing solvent phase: a) diluting and solubilizing a biocide, defoamer and antifreeze agent in demineralised water in a mixing vessel; adding solvent phase into a water phase, stirring to get homogenised mixture, adding previously prepared viscosity modifier solution and stirring to obtain EW formulation; CS Phase: Phase 1: solubilizing the third active ingredient in solvent, adding monomer-1; Phase 2: adding antifoam, emulsifier, dispersant in water to obtain homogenous mixture; adding Phase 1 into phase 2 under stirring to obtain emulsion of desired particle size; adding in to the monomer -2; heat the mixture for 2 hr under continuous stirring; cooling and adding the antifreeze solution, biocide and previously prepared xanthum gum solution and mixing till uniform dispersion of xanthum gum solution; Mixing CS and EW phase to obtain ZW formulation.

The compositions of the present invention can be applied by any one of the methods selected from, spreading, dusting, spraying, immersion, mixing, dressing, coating and fumigation.

The rate of application of amount of the prepared compositions varies depending on, for example, the blending ratio of active ingredients, meteorological condition, dosage form, application time, application method, application place, insects to be controlled, and a target crop, in ordinary cases.

The bio-efficacy of insecticidal compositions of present invention and comparative solo and binary compositions is evaluated by calculating % ROC (% reduction of insects over control) as given in bio-efficacy section. For the ease of understanding the bio-efficacy effect of an insecticidal compositions in pesticides technology is measured by following rating scale which is referred throughout in present specification. [Ref: Canadian Weed Science Society. 2018. Description of 0-100 rating scale for herbicide efficacy and crop phytotoxicity [Online] Available: https://weedscience.ca/cwss-visual-ratings-scale/ [2018 Jan. 15]
Rating Excellent Good Below expectation/suppression Not acceptable
Efficacy % Above 91% 80-90% 60-79% Below 60%
In an embodiment of the present invention, it is observed that solo Fenobucarb is only effective on jassids compared to its negligible effect on thrips, fruit-borer, aphids and whitefly as per captured data of tables 45-107. It is also noticeable that on fruit-borer its effect is almost nil. When the data set of solo Emamectin benzoate is analysed it is observed that on jassids, aphids and whitefly it is not effective at all whereas on fruit borer efficacy observed between in range of 35-50% same is noticed in thrips also. It is seen that solo Chlorantraniliprole is effective on fruit-borer but no effect is seen on jassids and thrips contrary solo Dinotefuran has no effect on fruit borer but shows % efficacy in range of 40-55 on jassids, thrips, aphids and whitefly. Solo Flonicamid also shown efficacy pattern in same line. Solo Flubendiamide although has proved effective on fruit borer but no effect observed on jassids and thrips. Solo Lambda-cyhalothrin also shows the efficacy pattern similar to Dinotefuran but it has minor effect on fruit-borer also. Novaluron being an insect growth regulator is known for its slow action and long duration herein except fruit-borer it has no effect on jassids and thrips. On the other hand Profenofos shows some efficacy on all the tested insects namely jassids, thrips, fruit-borer, aphids and whitefly in range of 35-57%. With Solo Pymetrozine efficacy is observed only for BPH wherein Pyriproxyfen efficacy is noticeable on whitefly and in some % on jassids, thrips and aphids with negligible effect on fruit-borer.
It can be seen from the rating scale of bio-efficacy measurement the efficacy below 60 % is not acceptable and all the tested solo insecticide compositions comparator of present invention falls behind this criteria. It is not advisable to farmers to use the insecticide formulation which is not able to kill even the 50% insect population since this only increase the cost of treatment, reduce crop yield and ultimately put threat to develop the resistance. In a second aspect it is also visible from the tables 45-107 that no single insecticide is able to kill all the insects, this compels the farmers to use multiple spray which gives only a cost burden without any desired efficacy. Besides Regulatory authorities have relied upon efficacy data which shows % efficacy more than 70 and then only authorise the placing of biocidal products on the market.

In an embodiment of the present invention, it is observed that all these solo compositions when compared with binary compositions comparator of present invention as illustrated in tables 45-107 gave mixed efficacy performance. Such as from tables 45-107, % efficacy of binary composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate falls in the range of 70-79 which is although good when compared to counterpart solo compositions still their efficacy on tested insects is below expectation as marked in bio-efficacy rating. From table 45-49 it is visible that binary composition Fenobucarb + Chlorantraniliprole shows negligible effect on thrips further this compositions proved poor on other insects. In the same tables binary composition Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole only has proven efficacy on fruit borer but not good on jassids and thrips. From tables 50-58 it is very clear that composition Fenobucarb + Dinotefuran not effective on fruit-borer at all although composition of Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran shows some effect on tested insects but still below expectation. Similarly, from table 59-67 binary composition Fenobucarb + Flonicamid is non effective on fruit borer and thrips although composition of Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid shows some effect on tested insects but still below expectation.
It is very clear from table 68-72 that binary composition Fenobucarb + Flubendiamide is not effective at all on thrips and fruit borer and composition of Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide is not effective on jassids. Tables 73-77 reveals that the composition Fenobucarb + Lambda-cyhalothrin is not effective on thrips and composition Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin is not effective on jassids. Similarly, Tables 78-82 reveals that the composition Fenobucarb + Novaluron is not effective on thrips and composition Novaluron + Emamectin benzoate is having low effect on jassids. The composition of Fenobucarb + Profenofos and Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos as given in tables 83-91 is not effective on fruit borer and whitefly respectively. Tables 92-98 shows the results of binary compositions Fenobucarb + Pymetrozine which proves very poor on thrips and binary compositions Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine proves very poor on jassids, results on BPH and leaf folder also not good. From tables 99-107 efficacy of binary compositions Fenobucarb + Pyriproxyfen towards fruit borer is observed which is very poor. In summary, all the tested binary compositions shown efficacy below expectations and not recommended to use during the fruiting stage wherein simultaneous occurrence of many insects are expected.

In an another embodiment of present invention the invented compositions of present invention are applied to control major insects which occurs simultaneously in the fruiting stage of vegetables crops such as chilli and cotton crop. Referring to tables 45-107 for dosages and efficacy % on various insects, the % ROC on all tested insects namely jassids, thrips, aphids, fruit-borer and whitefly was over 90% which were significantly better from their counterpart binary and solo compositions. It is importantly seen that % ROC over 90 % is observed for longer duration also i.e., after 14 DAA. This shows that the compositions of present invention have excellent efficacy effect on the tested crops for longer duration and at low a.i. content.
Therefore, as may be seen, multiple embodiments of the present invention, as disclosed hereinabove, provide significant advantages over prior arts. Specifically, in comparison to the prior art, embodiments of the present invention as disclosed herein below disclose a stable and highly efficacious agrochemical compositions.
As also observed in preceding paras by using the invented insecticide compositions, the range of action of the individual active ingredients broadens in three aspects: firstly, the rates of application of the individual active ingredients is reduced and good level of action is achieved while using the reduced amount; secondly, high level of insect control achieved which is not possible by using solo active ingredients; and thirdly, it elongase the process of resistance in insect species to selected insects. The compositions of present invention while showing the excellent control of insects in crops also allows the broad range of combinations/options for the farmers. Further the insecticide compositions of the present invention provides a number of other advantages viz., These compositions provided one shot solution to farmers to control broad spectrum of insects; economically beneficial to the farmers as it provides better yield of the crop with reduction in the number of sprays; reduced possibility of hazards to the farmers due to occupational exposure because of reduction in the number of spray; reduce labor costs;
storage stable; non-phytotoxic; uses lower amount of active ingredients hence environmental friendly. Further because of different mode of action there is a significant increase in efficacy spectrum which can delay the development of resistance and prolong the service life of the individual active agent; this allows a substantial reduction in the application rates of each of these active ingredients, while maintaining good efficacy. The decrease in application rates reduces treatment cost to the farmer and also eases the burden on the environment both from manufacturing waste and crop protection chemical residues.
The insecticidal compositions of present invention provides a wide spectrum control of insect-pests and minimizes the risk of development of resistance ultimately, which reflects the delays in emergence of the resistant strains hence provide effective and economical control of undesired insect-pest.
Summarily, the insecticidal compositions of the present invention provides a number of advantages:
• Significant increased efficacy in comparison to the other compositions tested during the trials.
• It enhances the efficacy and broaden the spectrum hence denies the need of sequential application of solo insecticides to control different pest spectra thereby reducing the environmental load of insecticides.
• Uses lesser amounts of active ingredients hence considerable reduction in cost, which would benefit farmers.
• The compositions provided one shot solution to farmers to control broad spectrum of pests.
• Is storage stable.
• Is completely safer to crops (non-phytotoxic).
• Reduction in environmental load of insecticidal residues.
• Reduction in quantity of water required for spray of the product in agriculture fields.
• Reduction in generation of empty containers of product, thereby, reducing concerns of their disposal.
• Provides a broad range of product choice for effective pest management.
• It reduces the risk of cross- resistance.

Thus, from the foregoing description, it will be apparent to one of the person skilled in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the description. Accordingly, it is not intended that the scope of the foregoing description be limited to the description set forth above, but rather that such description be construed as encompassing such features that reside in the present invention, including all the features and embodiments that would be treated as equivalents thereof by those skilled in the relevant art.
The embodiments of the present invention are more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrations only, since numerous modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention will be apparent to those of skill in the art. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight basis and all reagents used in the examples were obtained or are available from the chemical suppliers.
EXAMPLES
The insecticidal compositions of the present invention comprising first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate, herein below in examples referred as Fenobucarb, and a second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts and a third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole, Dinotefuran, Flonicamid, Flubendiamide, Lambda-cyhalothrin, Novaluron, Profenofos, Pymetrozine and Pyriproxyfen and agriculturally acceptable excipient(s) in the form of suspension concentrate (SC), water dispersible granule (WDG), suspo-emulsion (SE), micro-emulsion (ME), emulsifiable concentrate (EC), emulsion oil-in-water (EW) and a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) is provided in table 1-44. The unit of each component of the compositions are expressed in “% w/w” i.e. the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solution or composition. All the compositions are prepared by following the processes as disclosed in description. All the prepared compositions of the present invention has been tested for stability/shelf life at accelerated temperature.

Table 1: Examples 1 to 3: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole (SC)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 1 Eg: 2 Eg: 3
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 24.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.6 0.4 0.5
3 Chlorantraniliprole Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 2.6 4.0
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 7.0 7.0 7.0
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt Dispersing Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Ethoxylated Isodecyl Alcohol Wetting Agent 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 Precipitated silica Anti-settling Agent 2.5 2.5 2.5
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 2.0 2.0 2.0
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
11 D. M. Water Diluent 64.0 57.6 60.1
Total 100 100 100
Table 2: Quantities of ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% (SC)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.63
3 Chlorantraniliprole Tech. (Purity 95%) 5.26
4 Propylene glycol 7.00
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt 3.00
6 Ethoxylated Isodecyl Alcohol 0.50
7 Precipitated silica 2.50
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 2.00
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
10 Xanthan Gum 0.3
11 D. M. Water 63.25
Total 100

Table 3: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.15% 15.17%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.6% (±25%) 0.59% 0.51%
Chlorantraniliprole Content %w/w Min. 5% (±10%) 5.00% 5.03%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.4% 97.27%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 94.8% 95.7%
Chlorantraniliprole Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 94.3% 87.00%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.79% 99.77%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 7.3 7.1
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 5 ml 3 ml
Specific gravity 1.03 (±0.02) 1.03 --

Table 4: Examples 4 to 6: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole (SE)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 4 Eg: 5 Eg: 6
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 24.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.6 0.4 0.5
3 Chlorantraniliprole Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 2.6 4.0
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt Dispersing Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Ethoxylated Isodecyl Alcohol Wetting Agent 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol Emulsifier 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 1.0 1.0 1.0
9 High solvency C11 aromatic fluid Solvent 1 3.3 3.3 3.3
10 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 2 3.0 3.0 3.0
11 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
12 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.3 0.3 0.3
13 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
14 D. M. Water Diluent 60.5 54.1 56.6
Total 100 100 100

Table 5: Quantities of ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% (SE)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 95%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.61
3 Chlorantraniliprole Tech. (Purity 96%) 5.5
4 Propylene glycol 4.00
5 Ethoxylated Polyarylphenol Phosphate Amine Salt 3.00
6 Ethoxylated Isodecyl Alcohol 0.50
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol 3.00
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 1.00
9 High solvency C11 aromatic fluid 3.3
10 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 3.00
11 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
12 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.3
13 Xanthan Gum 0.3
14 D. M. Water 59.54
Total 100

Table 6: Examples 7 to 9: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran (WDG)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 7 Eg: 8 Eg: 9
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 22.5 19.5
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.9 0.7 1.1
3 Dinotefuran Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 2.25 2.7
4 Sodium Polycarboxylate Dispersing agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
5 Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate Wetting agent 2.0 2.5 2.5
6 Ammonium Sulphate Disintegrating agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
7 China clay Filler 1 56.7 43.04 45.2
8 Precipitated silica Filler 2 10.0 15.0 15.0
Total 100 100 100

Table 7: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% (WDG)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 96%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.94
3 Dinotefuran Tech. (Purity 98%) 1.42
4 Sodium Polycarboxylate 4.0
5 Sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate 2.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate 10.0
7 China clay 56.18
8 Precipitated silica 10
Total 100

Table 8: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% (WDG) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.5% 15.4%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.9% (±25%) 0.96% 0.95%
Dinotefuran Content %w/w Min. 1.4% (±10%) 1.52% 1.56%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 93.9% 87.5%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 81.03% 75%
Dinotefuran Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 96.77% 96.15%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test 75 micron sieve 99.65% 99.49%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 6.4 6.2
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 2 ml 3 ml
Wettability Max. 60 sec 16 sec 23 sec
Moisture content 1% to 4% 2.16% 1.75%

Table 9: Examples 10 to 12: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid (WDG)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 10 Eg: 11 Eg: 12
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 25.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.1 0.8 0.6
3 Flonicamid Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 3.4 6.6 5.0
4 High molecular weight purified sodium ligno-sulphonate Dispersing agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 Sodium Alkyl Dibutyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate Disintegrating agent 30.0 20.0 20.0
7 China clay Filler 1 26.5 16.6 25.4
8 Precipitated silica Filler 2 10.0 17.0 15.0
Total 100 100 100

Table 10: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% (WDG)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 96%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.15
3 Flonicamid Tech. (Purity 98%) 3.46
4 High molecular weight purified sodium ligno-sulphonate 10.0
5 Sodium Alkyl Dibutyl Naphthalene Sulfonate 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate 30.0
7 China clay 25.93
8 Precipitated silica 10.0
Total 100

Table 11: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% (WDG) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.43% 15.38%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1% (±25%) 0.98% 0.97%
Flonicamid Content %w/w Min. 3.4% (±10%) 3.59% 3.56%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 70% 76.5% 74%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 84% 75%
Pymetrozine Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 92.67% 92.45%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test 75 micron sieve 99.10% 99.15%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 7.6 7.2
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 2 ml 3 ml
Wettability Max. 60 sec 10 sec 12 sec
Moisture content 1% to 4% 2.6% 3.25%

Table 12: Examples 13 to 15: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide (SE)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 13 Eg: 14 Eg: 15
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 25.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.6 0.5 0.4
3 Flubendiamide Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 5.0 3.0 4.0
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 7.0 7.0 7.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer Dispersing Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether Wetting Agent 1.5 1.5 1.5
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol Emulsifier 3.0 3.0 3.0
8 Solvent C-9 Solvent 3.3 3.3 3.3
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 2.0 2.0 2.0
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.3 0.3 0.3
11 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
12 D. M. Water Diluent 59 51.1 55.2
Total 100 100 100

Table 13: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% (SE)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.63
3 Flubendiamide Tech. (Purity 95%) 5.15
4 Propylene glycol 7.00
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer 3.00
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 1.50
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol 3.00
8 Solvent C-9 3.3
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 2.00
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.3
11 Xanthan Gum 0.3
12 D. M. Water 58.36
Total 100

Table 14: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% (SE) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.07% 15.04%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.6% (±25%) 0.57% 0.55%
Flubendiamide Content %w/w Min. 5% (±10%) 5.37% 5.34%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 97.5% 97.00%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 96.6% 94.7%
Flubendiamide Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 84.2% 81.00%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.31% 99.57%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 7.3 7.1
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 5 ml 3 ml
Specific gravity 1.03 (±0.02) 1.03 --

Table 15: Examples 16 to 18: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda cyhalothrin (ME)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 16 Eg: 17 Eg: 18
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 15.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.1 0.9 1.1
3 Lambda Cyhalothrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.0 3.4
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylate Emulsifier 1 1.0 1.0 2.0
6 Castor oil ethoxylate Emulsifier 2 10.0 12.0 12.0
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylate non-ionic surfactant Emulsifier 3 5.0 5.0 5.0
8 D. M. Water Filler 2.57 2.0 2.0
9 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether Solvent 2 58.93 50.1 54.5
Total 100 100 100

Table 16: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (ME)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.15
3 Lambda-cyhalothrin Tech. (Purity 96%) 1.46
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5.0
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylate 1.00
6 Castor oil ethoxylate 10.00
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylate non-ionic surfactant 5.00
8 D. M. Water 2.0
9 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether 58.93
Total 100

Table 17: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (ME) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.91% 15.86%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1.1% (±25%) 1.19% 0.92%
Lambda-cyhalothrin Content %w/w Min. 1.4% (±10%) 1.42% 1.35%
Emulsion stable There Should not be any creamed matter at the top and the sediment at the bottom of the cylinder after 2 hour in standard hard water D.

Qualify

Qualify
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 4.0 to 6.0 5.5 4.4
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 30 ml 20 ml
Specific gravity 1.01 (±0.02) 1.01 1.00
Cold test at 0 0C for 7 days There should not be turbidity or separated solid or oily matter or both
Qualify

Table 18: Examples 18 to 20: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda cyhalothrin (WDG)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 18 Eg: 19 Eg: 20
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 15.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.1 0.9 1.1
3 Lambda cyhalothrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.0 3.4
4 Sodium ligno-Sulphonate Dispersing agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 Sodium Butyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate Disintegrating agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
7 China clay Filler 1 48.5 34.1 41.5
8 Precipitated silica Filler 2 10.0 17.0 15.0
Total 100 100 100

Table 19: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (WDG)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 96%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.15
3 Lambda-cyhalothrin Tech. (Purity 96%) 1.45
4 Sodium lingo-Sulphonate 10.0
5 Sodium Butyl Naphthalene Sulfonate 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate 10.0
7 China clay 47.94
8 Precipitated silica 10.0
Total 100

Table 20: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (WDG) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.82% 15.81%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1.1% (±25%) 1.16% 1.13%
Lambda-cyhalothrin Content %w/w Min. 1.4% (±25%) 1.46% 1.46%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 81.1% 87.3%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 70% 73.5% 72.00%
Lambda-cyhalothrin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 70% 74.00% 72.00%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test 75 micron sieve 99.16% 99.11%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 6.5 6.3
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 2 ml 3 ml
Wettability Max. 60 sec 14 sec 15 sec
Moisture content 1% to 4% 2.94% 2.43%

Table 21: Examples 21 to 23: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin (EW)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 21 Eg: 22 Eg: 23
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 15.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.1 0.9 1.1
3 Lambda-cyhalothrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.0 3.4
4 Propylene Glycol Anti-Freeze agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
6 Solvent C-9 Solvent 2 20.0 20.0 20.0
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylate Emulsifier 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
11 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
12 D. M. Water Diluent 36.6 29.2 34.6
Total 100 100 100

Table 22: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (EW)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.15
3 Lambda-cyhalothrin Tech. (Purity 97%) 1.44
4 Propylene Glycol 10.00
5 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5.0
6 Solvent C-9 20.0
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 5.0
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
11 Xanthan Gum 0.3
12 D. M. Water 36.05
Total 100

Table 23: Examples 24 to 26: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin (ZW)

Lambda-cyhalothrin 25% CS composition

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 24 Eg: 25 Eg: 26
% w/w
1 Lambda -cyhalothrin Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.4 1.0 3.4
2 Monomer 1 Film forming agent 1 0.5 0.3 0.6
3 Monomer 2 Film forming agent 2 0.2 0.1 0.2
4 Propylene Glycol Anti-freeze Agent 7.0 7.0 7.0
5 Ligno-Sulphonate Dispersing agent 1.0 1.0 1.0
6 Solvent C-9 Solvent 20.0 20.0 20.0
7 Castor oil ethoxylates Emulsifier 1 2.5 2.5 2.5
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 2.5 2.5 2.5
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
11 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
12 D. M. Water Diluent 64 64.7 61.9
Total 100 100 100

ZW composition

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 24 Eg: 25 Eg: 26
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 15.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.1 0.9 1.1
3 Lambda cyhalothrin CS (25% Purity) Formulation 5.6 4.0 13.6
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Solvent C-9 Solvent 2 20.0 20.0 20.0
6 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates Emulsifier 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
7 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 5.0 5.0 5.0
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
10 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
11 D. M. Water Diluent 42.4 36.2 34.4
Total 100 100 100

Table 24: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% (ZW)

Lambda-cyhalothrin 25% CS composition

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Lambda-cyhalothrin Tech. (Purity 97%) 26
2 Monomer 1 0.5
3 Monomer 2 0.2
4 Propylene Glycol 7.00
5 Lignosulphonate 1.00
6 Solvent C-9 20.0
7 Castor oil ethoxylates 40 mole 2.5
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 2.5
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
11 Xanthan Gum 0.3
12 D. M. Water 39.4
Total 100

ZW composition

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.15
3 Lambda-cyhalothrin 25% CS 5.6
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5
5 Solvent C-9 20
6 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5
7 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 5
8 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
9 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
10 Xanthan Gum 0.3
11 D. M. Water 31.89
Total 100

Table 25: Examples 27 to 29: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron (SE)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 27 Eg: 28 Eg: 29
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 25.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech.(100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.0 0.8 0.6
3 Novaluron Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 8.0 9.0 6.5
4 Propylene glycol Anti-freeze Agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer Dispersing Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether Wetting Agent 1.5 1.5 1.5
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol Emulsifier 1 3.0 3.2 3.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 1.0 1.2 1.0
9 High solvency C11 aromatic fluid Solvent 1 3.3 4.5 3.3
10 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 2 3.0 3.0 2.5
11 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
12 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.3 0.3 0.3
13 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
14 D. M. Water Diluent 56.1 43.7 53.5
Total 100 100 100

Table 26: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron (SE)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 95%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (purity 95%) 1.05
3 Novaluron Tech. (Purity 97%) 8.24
4 Propylene glycol 4.00
5 Polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer 3.00
6 Polyoxyethylene alkyl ether 1.50
7 Ethoxylated Tristyrylphenol 3.00
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 1.00
9 High solvency C11 aromatic fluid 3.3
10 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 3.00
11 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
12 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.3
13 Xanthan Gum 0.3
14 D. M. Water 55.35
Total 100

Table 27: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron (SE) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.28% 15.25%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1% (±25%) 1.01% 0.92%
Novaluron Content %w/w Min. 8% (±10%) 8.4% 8.6%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.02% 98.80%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.4% 98.07%
Novaluron Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 97.04% 96.1%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.91% 99.89%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 6.8 6.7
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 5 ml 5 ml
Specific gravity 1.05 (±0.02) 1.05 1.04

Table 28: Examples 30 to 32: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos (EC)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 30 Eg: 31 Eg: 32
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 18.5
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.0 0.7 0.5
3 Profenofos Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 20.0 23 18.5
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates Emulsifier 1 6.0 7.0 7.0
6 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 4.0 5.0 5.0
7 Non-ionic ethopropoxylated polyarylphenol Emulsifier 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
8 Solvent C-9 Solvent 46.0 33.3 42.5
Total 100 100 100

Table 29: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% (EC)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.05
3 Profenofos Tech. (Purity 95%) 21.05
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5.0
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 6.0
6 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 4.00
7 Non-ionic ethopropoxylated polyarylphenol 3.00
8 Solvent C-9 44.44
Total 100

Table 30: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% (EC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.96% 15.75%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1% (±25%) 1.07% 0.99%
Profenofos Content %w/w Min. 20% (±6%) 19.59% 18.63%
Emulsion stable There Should not be any creamed matter at the top and the sediment at the bottom of the cylinder after 2 hour in standard hard water D.

Qualify

Qualify
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 4.0 to 5.0 4.329 3.508
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 05 ml 06 ml
Specific gravity 1.01 (±0.02) 0.98 --
Cold test at 0 0C for 7 days There should not be turbidity or separated solid or oily matter or both
Qualify

Table 31: Examples 33 to 35: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine (WDG)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 33 Eg: 34 Eg: 35
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 25.0 20.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 1.0 0.8 0.5
3 Pymetrozine Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 6.0 7.5 9.0
4 Modified sodium lignosulphonate Dispersing agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 Sodium Butyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 4.0 4.0 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate Disintegrating agent 30.0 20.0 20.0
7 China clay Filler 1 23.37 15.7 21.5
8 Precipitated silica Filler 2 10.0 17.0 15.0
Total 100 100 100

Table 32: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% (WDG)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 96%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.05
3 Pymetrozine Tech. (Purity 98%) 6.12
4 Modified sodium lignosulphonate 10.0
5 Sodium Butyl Naphthalene Sulfonate 4.0
6 Ammonium Sulphate 30.0
7 China clay 23.37
8 Precipitated silica 10
Total 100

Table 33: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% (WDG) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.57% 15.61%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 1% (±25%) 1.1% 1.01%
Pymetrozine Content %w/w Min. 6% (±10%) 6.10% 6.06%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 85% 84%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 87% 85%
Pymetrozine Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 84% 82%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test 75 micron sieve 99.16% 99.11%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 7.6 7.8
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 2 ml 3 ml
Wettability Max. 60 sec 10 sec 12 sec
Moisture content 1% to 4% 2.92% 1.69%

Table 34: Examples 36 to 38: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen (ME)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 36 Eg: 37 Eg: 38
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 19.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.9 0.4 0.7
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.4 8.6 6.5
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
5 Blend of non-ionic and anionic emulsifier (Proprietary blend) Emulsifier 1 20.0 21.0 21.0
6 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 Castor oil Ethoxylate Emulsifier 3 4.5 5.0 5.0
8 D. M. Water filler 3.0 3.0 3.0
9 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether Solvent 2 45.0 33.5 39.3
Total 100 100 100

Table 35: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (ME)
SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.94
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 98%) 4.48
4 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5.0
5 Blend of non-ionic and anionic emulsifier (proprietary blend) 20.0
6 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 0.5
7 Castor oil Ethoxylate 4.5
8 D. M. Water 3.0
9 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether 45.0
Total 100

Table 36: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (ME) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.15% 15.27%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.9% (±25%) 0.91% 0.82%
Pyriproxyfen Content %w/w Min. 4.4% (±10%) 4.40% 4.36%
Emulsion stable There Should not be any creamed matter at the top and the sediment at the bottom of the cylinder after 2 hour in standard hard water D.

Qualify

Qualify
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 4.0 to 5.0 4.41 4.49
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 25 ml 30 ml
Specific gravity 1.01 (±0.02) 1.01 1.00
Cold test at 0 0C for 7 days There should not be turbidity or separated solid or oily matter or both
Qualify

Table 37: Examples 39 to 41: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen (WDG)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 39 Eg: 40 Eg: 41
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 19.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.9 0.4 0.7
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.4 8.6 6.5
4 Sodium salts of naphthalene sulfonates condensed with formaldehyde Dispersing agent 1 3.0 3.0 3.0
5 Sodium Isopropyl Naphthalene Sulfonate Wetting agent 1.5 1.5 1.5
6 Modified styrene acrylic polymer Dispersing agent 2 1.5 1.5 1.5
7 China clay Filler 1 63.7 45.0 57.8
8 Precipitated silica Filler 2 10.0 17.0 15.0
Total 100 100 100

Table 38: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (WDG)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 15.46
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 0.94
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 98%) 4.48
4 Sodium salts of naphthalene sulfonates condensed with formaldehyde 3.0
5 Sodium Isopropyl Naphthalene Sulfonate 1.5
6 Modified styrene acrylic polymer Dispersant 1.5
7 China clay 63.12
8 Precipitated silica 10
Total 100

Table 39: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (WDG) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)
Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 15.4 15.5
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.9% (±25%) 1.01% 0.98%
Pyriproxyfen Content %w/w Min. 4.4% (±10%) 4.42 4.12
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 83% 78.1%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 84% 83.08%
Pyriproxyfen Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 83.8% 81.01%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test 75 micron sieve 99.89% 99.80%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 7.0 to 9.0 7.9 8.09
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 2 ml 3 ml
Wettability Max. 60 sec 10 sec 12 sec
Moisture content 1% to 4% 2.84% 2.69%

Table 40: Examples 42 to 44: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen (SC)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 42 Eg: 43 Eg: 44
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 19.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.9 0.4 0.7
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.4 8.6 6.5
4 Glycerin Anti-freeze Agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates Dispesant Dispersing Agent 2.0 2.0 2.0
6 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of Supplier) Dispersing cum wetting Agent 3.0 3.0 3.0
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
9 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
10 D. M. Water Diluent 63.8 52.1 57.9
Total 100 100 100

Table 41: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (SC)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 4.5
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.05
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 97%) 5.26
4 Glycerin 10.00
5 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates Dispesant 2.00
6 Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of Supplier) 3.00
7 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
8 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
9 Xanthan Gum 0.3
10 D. M. Water 73.29
Total 100

Table 42: Stability studies of the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (SC) (Shelf life based on accelerated storage at 54 ± 2°C)

Test Parameter FAO Specification ‘0’ day RT 14 days HST
at 54 ± 2°C
Fenobucarb Content %w/w Min. 15% (±6%) 14.17% 12.63%
Emamectin Content %w/w Min. 0.9% (±25%) 0.89% 0.89%
Pyriproxyfen Content %w/w Min. 4.4% (±10%) 4.40% 4.07%
Fenobucarb Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.15% 97.17%
Emamectin Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.8% 98.2%
Pyriproxyfen Suspensibility %w/w Min. 80% 98.4% 97.3%
Wet Sieve Test (75 µm) Max. 98% material pass through test sieve 99.96% 99.95%
pH 1 % (aqueous solution) 6.0 to 8.0 7.3 7.1
Persistent foam Max. 60 mL after 1 min. 5 ml 5 ml
Specific gravity 1.04 (±0.02) 1.04 --

Table 43: Examples 45 to 47: Composition of Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen (EW)

SN Ingredients Ingredients Description Eg: 45 Eg: 46 Eg: 47
% w/w
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 15.0 23.0 19.0
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 0.9 0.4 0.7
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (100% Basis) Active Ingredient 4.4 8.6 6.5
4 Propylene Glycol Anti-freeze Agent 10.0 10.0 10.0
5 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Solvent 1 5.0 5.0 5.0
6 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether Solvent 2 15.0 20.0 20.0
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates Emulsifier 1 5.0 6.0 6.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate Emulsifier 2 4.0 4.5 4.6
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion Defoamer 0.5 0.5 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one Biocide 0.1 0.1 0.1
11 Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.3 0.3 0.3
12 D. M. Water Diluent 39.8 21.6 27.3
Total 100 100 100

Table 44: Quantities of Ingredients charged to prepare the composition of Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% (SC)

SN Ingredients Qty gm
1 Fenobucarb Tech. (Purity 97%) 4.5
2 Emamectin benzoate Tech. (Purity 95%) 1.05
3 Pyriproxyfen Tech. (Purity 97%) 5.26
4 Propylene Glycol 10.00
5 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) 5.0
6 Dipropylene glycol methyl ether 15.0
7 Tristyrylphenol ethoxylates 5.0
8 Calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate 4.0
9 Polydimethylsiloxane Antifoam Emulsion 0.5
10 Benzisothiazolin-3-one 0.10
11 Xanthan Gum 0.3
12 D. M. Water 49.29
Total 100

As evident from the foregoing tables (1-44) that all the desired compositions have been prepared successfully and has been tested for stability/shelf life at accelerated temperature. After 14 days of storage at 54.0 ± 2 °C, there were no significant changes in active ingredient content, suspensibility, wettability, dispersibility, pH and has passes the sieve test. Therefore, it is concluded that compositions of present invention has good stability and shelf life.

BIO-EFFICACY OF THE INSECTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
Experimental trial was conducted to evaluate the insecticidal compositions of the present invention in India against major insects on Cotton, Chilli and Paddy Crop with compositions of present invention and comparative solo and binary compositions as per the details provided in Tables 45-107. The abbreviations used in tables 45-107 are as follows:
TN: Treatment Number; g.a.i: gram active ingredients; ha: hectare
DAA: Days after Insecticide application; UTC: Untreated control
Experimental design and method for Cotton Crop
The present field experiment was conducted in Akola district of Maharashtra state during the season Kharif-2022 with ten treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design. The Cotton hybrid Surpass Super was sown in a plot size of 5.4m X 5.4m for each replication with a spacing of 90cm X 60cm in black Cotton soil. The crop was maintained well by adapting standard agronomic practices. The treatments were imposed when aphid, jassids, thrips, and whitefly population attained economic threshold level. Total two round of sprays were given, 1st at 0 days and 2nd at after 10 days. The populations of sucking pest viz., aphid, jassids, thrips, and whitefly were recorded from top, middle and bottom leaves of five randomly tagged plants per plot at a day (0 day) before first spray and 7 and 14 days after application (DAA). The applications were carried out by using the hand operated aspire Knapsack sprayer pump fitted with hollow cone nozzle. The required quantity of water volume was used @ 500 litre per hectare. The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula: Reference: Abbott, W.S. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol.; 18 : 265-267.

Where, n = no. of insects; T = Treated; Co = Control
Experimental design and method for Chilli Crop
The present field experiment was conducted at Baptala of Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh state during the season Rabi-2022 with ten treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design. The popular and widely cultivated Guntur Chilli variety S-4 selected for this experiment was sown in a plot size of 5m X 5m for each replication with a spacing of 60cm X 45cm in sandy loam soil. The crop was maintained well by adapting standard agronomic practices. The treatments were imposed when aphids, jassids, thrips, whitefly population and fruit borer attained economic threshold level. Total two round of sprays were given, 1st at 0 days and 2nd at after 10 days. The observations on counts of sucking pest viz., aphids, jassids, thrips and whitefly population were recorded on five randomly tagged plants per treatment plot. On each plant, five leaves (two each from bottom and middle and one from top portion of the plant) were observed to note the pest count. First count was taken at a day (0 day) before first spray and post treatment counts were made at 7 and 14 days after application (DAA) whereas crop damage caused by Chilli fruit borer was measured on the basis of damaged fruits. In order to assess the % fruit damage, the damage fruits on five randomly selected tagged plants were counted as against total available fruits on the observed plants. Fruit damage was recorded after first and second application. The applications were carried out by using the hand operated aspire Knapsack sprayer pump fitted with hollow cone nozzle. The required quantity of water volume was used @ 500 litre per hectare. The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula as given above. The % fruit damage by Chilli fruit borer was calculated by using following formula:
No. of damaged fruits
Percent fruit damage = –––––––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
Total number of fruits

Experimental design and method for Paddy Crop
The present field experiment was conducted in Rajahmundry of East Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh state during the season Kharif-2023 with ten treatments replicated thrice in randomized block design. The Paddy variety BPT-5204 was selected for the experiment. The crop was transplanted in a plot size of 5m X 5m for each replication with a spacing of 20cm X 15cm in sandy loam soil. The crop was maintained well by adapting standard agronomic practices. The treatments were imposed when brown plant hoppers (BPH) and paddy leaf folder pest attained economic threshold level. Total two round of sprays were given, 1st at 0 days and 2nd at after 10 days. The applications were carried out by using the hand operated aspire Knapsack sprayer pump fitted with hollow cone nozzle. The required quantity of water volume was used @ 500 litre per hectare. The observations on brown plant hoppers (BPH) population was recorded from 05 hills per plot in each replication at a day (0 day) before first spray and 7 and 14 days after application (DAA). The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula as given above. The number of damaged and total leaves per 05 randomly selected hills in each treatment, under each replication was recorded at a day (0 day) before first spray and 7 and 14 days after application (DAA) in order to assess leaf folder damage while the mean percent damaged leaves per hill were calculated using the following formula:
No. of damaged leaves
% damage of leaves = –––––––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
Total number of leaves

The % reduction in target insect population over control was calculated by using Abbott's formula as given above.

Phytotoxicity Observations: Insecticidal compositions of the present invention tested for their bio-efficacy and tabulated in tables 45-107 were found completely safe (non-phytotoxic) on tested crops.
Table 45: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole on Cotton Crop against Jassids.

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SC 150+6+50 1000 9.00 1.10 90 1.08 91
T2 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SC 240+4+26 1000 8.00 0.99 91 0.72 94
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SC 200+5+40 1000 7.00 1.05 90.5 0.65 94.6
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SE 150+6+50 1000 7.00 0.97 91.2 0.92 93.4
T5 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SE 240+4+26 1000 9.00 0.94 91.5 0.87 93.8
T6 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SE 200+5+40 1000 7.00 0.88 92 0.73 94.8
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 8.00 3.08 72 2.88 76
T8 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 50% EC + 18.50% SC 750 + 30 1500 + 150 9.00 3.30 70 3.24 73
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 5% SG + 18.50% SC 11 + 30 220 + 150 8.00 8.58 22 8.64 28
T10 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 5.72 48 6.00 50
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 9.46 14 10.08 16
T12 Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 18.50% SC 30 150 8.00 9.90 10 10.32 14
T13 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 12.00

Table 46: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole on Cotton Crop against Thrips.

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SC 150+6+50 1000 12.00 1.54 89 1.02 94
T2 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SC 240+4+26 1000 10.00 1.37 90.2 1.28 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SC 200+5+40 1000 11.00 1.20 91.4 1.22 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SE 150+6+50 1000 10.00 1.23 91.2 1.31 92.3
T5 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SE 240+4+26 1000 11.00 0.98 93 1.02 94
T6 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SE 200+5+40 1000 11.00 0.91 93.5 0.92 94.6
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 12.00 3.36 76 3.74 78
T8 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 50% EC + 18.50% SC 750 + 30 1500 + 150 10.00 10.36 26 11.90 30
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 5% SG + 18.50% SC 11 + 30 220 + 150 10.00 4.48 68 4.59 73
T10 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 12.46 11 14.62 14
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 12.00 6.72 52 7.48 56
T12 Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 18.50% SC 30 150 11.00 13.02 7 15.30 10
T13 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 12.00 14.00 17.00

Table 47: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SC 150+6+50 1000 3.00 0.60 90 0.46 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SC 240+4+26 1000 4.00 0.72 88 0.72 91
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SC 200+5+40 1000 4.00 0.54 91 0.59 92.6
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SE 150+6+50 1000 3.00 0.53 91.2 0.56 93
T5 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SE 240+4+26 1000 3.00 0.48 92 0.48 94
T6 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SE 200+5+40 1000 4.00 0.42 93 0.40 95
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 4.00 1.44 76 1.68 79
T8 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 50% EC + 18.50% SC 750 + 30 1500 + 150 3.00 4.74 21 5.92 26
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 5% SG + 18.50% SC 10 + 30 200 + 150 3.00 1.74 71 2.24 72
T10 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 5.00 3.36 44 4.16 48
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 5.00 5.28 12 6.80 15
T12 Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 18.50% SC 30 150 4.00 5.46 9 7.12 11
T13 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 3.00 6.00 8.00

Table 48: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole on Chilli Crop against Thrips.

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SC 150+6+50 1000 9.00 1.00 90 0.94 92.8
T2 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SC 240+4+26 1000 9.00 0.85 91.5 0.98 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SC 200+5+40 1000 8.00 0.70 93 0.65 95
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SE 150+6+50 1000 7.00 0.72 92.8 0.91 93
T5 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SE 240+4+26 1000 7.00 0.70 93 0.79 93.9
T6 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5% SE 200+5+40 1000 8.00 0.62 93.8 0.64 95.1
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 2.70 73 2.86 78
T8 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 50% EC + 18.50% SC 750 + 30 1500 + 150 8.00 7.40 26 8.97 31
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 5% SG + 18.50% SC 10 + 30 200 + 150 7.00 3.20 68 3.51 73
T10 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 8.90 11 11.18 14
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 4.80 52 5.72 56
T12 Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 18.50% SC 30 150 8.00 9.30 7 11.83 9
T13 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 10.00 13.00

Table 49: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Chlorantraniliprole on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SC 150+6+50 1000 11.00 1.20 92 1.12 93.4
T2 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SC 240+4+26 1000 10.00 1.46 90.3 1.36 92
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5 SC 200+5+40 1000 10.00 1.74 88.4 1.53 91
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Chlorantraniliprole 5% 20.6% SE 150+6+50 1000 11.00 1.35 91 1.26 92.6
T5 Fenobucarb 24% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Chlorantraniliprole 2.6% 27% SE 240+4+26 1000 11.00 1.20 92 1.19 93
T6 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Chlorantraniliprole 4% 24.5 SE 200+5+40 1000 12.00 1.08 92.8 1.02 94
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 4.20 72 4.42 74
T8 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 50% EC + 18.50% SC 750 + 30 1500 + 150 11.00 4.76 68.3 5.10 70
T9 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 5% SG + 18.50% SC 10 + 30 200 + 150 10.00 3.57 76.2 3.74 78
T10 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 13.50 10 14.79 13
T11 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 8.40 44 9.01 47
T12 Chlorantraniliprole 18.50% SC 18.50% SC 30 150 11.00 9.30 38 10.03 41
T13 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 15.00 17.00

Table 50: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Cotton Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids
Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 18.00 1.20 94 1.06 95.2
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 16.00 1.76 91.2 1.76 92
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 17.00 2.22 88.9 1.91 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 16.00 15.20 24 15.84 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 16.00 5.20 74 4.62 79
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 11 + 30 220 + 150 18.00 6.60 67 6.60 70
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 18.00 16.60 17 17.38 21
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 16.00 17.60 12 18.48 16
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 16.00 11.60 42 11.88 46
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 3 leaves/plant) 17.00 20.00 22.00

Table 51: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 7.00 0.80 92 0.72 94
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 8.00 0.90 91 0.84 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 7.00 0.95 90.5 0.65 94.6
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 4.80 52 5.40 55
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 8.00 3.00 70 3.11 74.1
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 11 + 30 220 + 150 8.00 3.90 61 4.44 63
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 5.40 46 6.00 50
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 9.40 6 10.80 10
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 7.00 6.00 40 6.72 44
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 8.00 10.00 12.00

Table 52: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 10.00 1.30 90 0.96 94
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 11.00 1.27 90.2 1.20 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 11.00 1.12 91.4 1.12 93
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.68 64 5.09 68.2
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 10.00 4.42 66 4.80 70
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 11 + 30 220 + 150 10.00 3.77 71 4.00 75
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 11.05 15 13.12 18
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 8.32 36 9.60 40
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 11.00 7.54 42 8.16 49
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 10.00 13.00 16.00

Table 53: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Cotton Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 12.00 1.20 92 1.02 94
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 11.00 1.52 89.9 1.36 92
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 10.00 1.35 91 1.19 93
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 12.00 11.10 26 12.07 29
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 10.00 4.80 68 5.10 70
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 11 + 30 220 + 150 10.00 5.70 62 5.95 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 11.70 22 12.58 26
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 12.00 13.50 10 14.96 12
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 11.00 8.10 46 8.16 52
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 3 leaves/plant) 12.00 15.00 17.00

Table 54: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Chilli Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 8.00 1.06 89.4 0.96 92
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 8.00 0.90 91 0.72 94
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 7.00 0.78 92.2 0.55 95.4
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 7.40 26 8.52 29
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 6.00 2.90 71 2.88 76
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 10 + 30 200 + 150 7.00 3.50 65 3.48 71
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 8.80 12 9.84 18
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 9.20 8 10.56 12
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 6.00 5.30 47 5.76 52
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 10.00 12.00

Table 55: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 4.00 0.59 90.1 0.63 93
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 4.00 0.68 88.6 0.81 91
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 5.00 0.54 91 0.45 95
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 4.00 1.80 70 2.43 73
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 4.00 1.56 74 1.98 78
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 10 + 30 200 + 150 5.00 1.92 68 2.61 71
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 4.00 3.36 44 4.77 47
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 5.00 5.28 12 7.74 14
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 5.00 3.60 40 5.22 42
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 4.00 6.00 9.00

Table 56: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 9.00 1.10 90 1.04 92
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 9.00 0.94 91.5 0.98 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 8.00 0.79 92.8 0.78 94
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 4.40 60 4.68 64
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 8.00 3.52 68 3.90 70
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 10 + 30 200 + 150 10.00 2.97 73 3.12 76
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 10.00 9.79 11 11.18 14
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 6.49 41 7.28 44
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 8.00 5.50 50 5.98 54
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 13.00

Table 57: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Chilli Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 6.00 0.63 91 0.69 93.1
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 6.00 0.49 93 0.50 95
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 5.00 0.76 89.2 0.75 92.5
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 5.00 5.46 22 7.40 26
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 5.00 2.10 70 2.50 75
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 10 + 30 200 + 150 4.00 2.38 66 3.00 70
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 5.04 28 6.70 33
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 6.00 6.44 8 8.80 12
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 5.00 3.92 44 5.30 47
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 5.00 7.00 10.00

Table 58: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Dinotefuran on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Dinotefuran 1.4% 17.3 % WDG 150+9+14 1000 13.00 1.20 92 1.02 94
T2 Fenobucarb 22.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Dinotefuran 2.5% 25.45% WDG 225+7+25 1000 11.00 1.35 91 1.36 92
T3 Fenobucarb 19.5% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Dinotefuran 2.7% 23.3. % WDG 195+11+27 1000 11.00 1.71 88.6 1.53 91
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 4.80 68 5.10 70
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Dinotefuran 20% SG 50% EC + 20% SG 750 + 30 1500 + 150 11.00 12.30 18 13.26 22
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Dinotefuran 20% SG 5% SG + 20% SG 10 + 30 200 + 150 10.00 3.57 76.2 3.74 78
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 13.50 10 14.79 13
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 9.00 40 9.18 46
T9 Dinotefuran 20% SG 20% SG 30 150 13.00 13.20 12 14.28 16
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 15.00 17.00

Table 59: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Cotton Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 15.00 1.52 92 1.10 95.2
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 16.00 1.67 91.2 1.61 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 17.00 1.90 90 2.00 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 16.00 14.25 25 16.56 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 16.00 5.70 70 5.98 74
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 75 220 + 150 17.00 7.60 60 8.05 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 15.00 16.15 15 18.86 18
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 16.00 17.29 9 20.47 11
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 16.00 11.40 40 13.11 43
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 3 leaves/plant) 15.00 19.00 23.00

Table 60: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 8.00 0.90 91.8 0.95 93.2
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 8.00 0.99 91 0.98 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 9.00 1.05 90.5 1.01 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 5.39 51 6.30 55
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 8.00 2.86 74 3.08 78
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 75 220 + 150 8.00 3.52 68 3.92 72
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 6.16 44 7.28 48
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 10.23 7 12.46 11
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 7.00 5.61 49 6.72 52
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 9.00 11.00 14.00

Table 61: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 9.00 1.43 89 1.20 92
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 11.00 1.14 91.2 1.13 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 9.00 1.12 91.4 1.05 93
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.81 63 4.95 67
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 10.00 7.15 45 7.65 49
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 75 220 + 150 10.00 4.16 68 3.90 74
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 11.70 10 13.05 13
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 9.00 7.80 40 8.10 46
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 9.00 8.06 38 8.55 43
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 9.00 13.00 15.00

Table 62: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Cotton Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 13.00 1.12 92 1.02 94
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 11.00 1.26 91 1.19 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 12.00 1.23 91.2 1.12 93.4
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 12.00 11.76 16 12.92 24
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 10.00 5.32 62 5.44 68
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 75 220 + 150 11.00 5.74 59 6.12 64
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 11.20 20 12.75 25
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 12.00 12.74 9 14.79 13
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 13.00 8.40 40 9.35 45
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 3 leaves/plant) 12.00 14.00 17.00

Table 63: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Chilli Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 7.00 1.10 90 1.04 92
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 7.00 0.99 91 0.88 93.2
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 8.00 0.86 92.2 0.78 94
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 8.58 22 9.62 26
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 7.00 3.52 68 3.38 74
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 75 200 + 150 9.00 3.74 66 3.90 70
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 8.80 20 10.01 23
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 10.23 7 11.31 13
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 6.00 6.38 42 6.37 51
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 13.00

Table 64: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 6.00 0.64 92 0.65 94.1
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 6.00 0.72 91 0.77 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 5.00 0.76 90.5 0.79 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 4.00 4.32 46 5.50 50
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 4.00 2.24 72 2.53 77
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 75 200 + 150 5.00 2.56 68 3.08 72
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 4.80 40 6.38 42
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 5.00 7.44 7 9.79 11
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 5.00 4.08 49 4.95 55
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 6.00 8.00 11.00

Table 65: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips

No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 8.00 1.44 88 1.50 90
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 8.00 1.06 91.2 1.13 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 8.00 1.03 91.4 1.05 93
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 4.80 60 4.95 67
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 8.00 6.60 45 7.65 49
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 75 200 + 150 9.00 3.96 67 3.90 74
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 10.56 12 12.60 16
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 6.96 42 8.10 46
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 8.00 7.20 40 8.55 43
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 9.00 12.00 15.00

Table 66: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Chilli Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly
Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 8.00 0.82 91.8 0.78 94
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 6.00 0.90 91 0.91 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 8.00 0.88 91.2 0.86 93.4
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 7.80 22 10.79 17
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 7.00 3.40 66 3.90 70
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 75 200 + 150 7.00 4.00 60 4.68 64
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 8.00 20 9.75 25
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 6.00 9.20 8 11.57 11
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 8.00 5.90 41 7.15 45
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 10.00 13.00

Table 67: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flonicamid on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Flonicamid 3.4% 19.5% WDG 150+11+34 1000 13.00 1.20 92 1.04 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Flonicamid 6.6% 32.4 % WDG 250+8+66 1000 12.00 0.90 91 0.91 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flonicamid 5% 25.6 % WDG 200+6+50 1000 12.00 0.99 90.1 1.04 92
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 3.40 66 3.87 70.2
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flonicamid 50% WG 50% EC + 50% WG 750 + 75 1500 + 150 12.00 8.70 13 10.66 18
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flonicamid 50% WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 75 200 + 150 14.00 2.70 73 3.08 76.3
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 9.40 6 11.44 12
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 5.90 41 7.28 44
T9 Flonicamid 50% WG 50% WG 75 150 13.00 8.90 11 10.92 16
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 13.00 15.00 18.00

Table 68: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% 20.6 % SE 150+6+50 1000 9.00 0.88 92 0.92 93.9
T2 Fenobucarb 50% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Flubendiamide 6% 57% SE 250+5+30 500 9.00 0.99 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 26.7% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Flubendiamide 5.3% 32.5% SE 200+4+40 750 8.00 1.05 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 4.18 62 4.77 68.2
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flubendiamide 20% WG 50% EC + 20% WG 750 + 50 1500 + 250 8.00 3.30 70 3.75 75
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flubendiamide 20% WG 5% SG + 20% WG 11 + 50 220 + 250 8.00 8.58 22 10.95 27
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 6.82 38 8.85 41
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 9.90 10 12.75 15
T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG 20% WG 50 250 8.00 10.34 6 13.50 10
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 15.00

Table 69: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% 20.6 % SE 150+6+50 1000 10.00 1.30 90 1.28 92
T2 Fenobucarb 50% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Flubendiamide 6% 57% SE 250+5+30 500 11.00 1.14 91.2 1.20 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 26.7% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Flubendiamide 5.3% 32.5% SE 200+4+40 750 9.00 1.12 91.4 1.04 93.5
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.81 63 5.28 67
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flubendiamide 20% WG 50% EC + 20% WG 750 + 50 1500 + 250 9.00 8.84 32 9.76 39
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flubendiamide 20% WG 5% SG + 20% WG 11 + 50 220 + 250 10.00 4.16 68 4.16 74
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 10.14 22 11.84 26
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 7.80 40 8.64 46
T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG 20% WG 50 250 9.00 11.70 10 13.76 14
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 10.00 13.00 16.00

Table 70: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% 20.6 % SE 150+6+50 1000 8.00 0.78 92.2 0.80 94.3
T2 Fenobucarb 50% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Flubendiamide 6% 57% SE 250+5+30 500 6.00 0.90 91 0.90 93.6
T3 Fenobucarb 26.7% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Flubendiamide 5.3% 32.5% SE 200+4+40 750 6.00 0.95 90.5 1.12 92
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 3.80 62 4.34 69
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flubendiamide 20% WG 50% EC + 20% WG 750 + 50 1500 + 250 8.00 2.90 71 3.36 76
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flubendiamide 20% WG 5% SG + 20% WG 10 + 50 200 + 250 6.00 7.80 22 10.22 27
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 6.00 40 7.98 43
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 8.90 11 11.90 15
T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG 20% WG 50 250 8.00 9.30 7 12.60 10
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 10.00 14.00

Table 71: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% 20.6 % SE 150+6+50 1000 7.00 1.10 90 1.04 92.6
T2 Fenobucarb 50% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Flubendiamide 6% 57% SE 250+5+30 500 7.00 0.97 91.2 0.99 92.9
T3 Fenobucarb 26.7% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Flubendiamide 5.3% 32.5% SE 200+4+40 750 8.00 0.77 93 0.70 95
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 3.96 64 4.48 68
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flubendiamide 20% WG 50% EC + 20% WG 750 + 50 1500 + 250 8.00 8.03 27 9.52 32
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flubendiamide 20% WG 5% SG + 20% WG 10 + 50 200 + 250 9.00 3.52 68 3.50 75
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 9.68 12 11.62 17
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 6.93 37 7.84 44
T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG 20% WG 50 250 7.00 10.12 8 12.32 12
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 14.00

Table 72: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Flubendiamide on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Flubendiamide 5% 20.6 % SE 150+6+50 1000 13.00 1.38 91.4 1.16 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 50% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Flubendiamide 6% 57% SE 250+5+30 500 14.00 1.44 91 1.40 93
T3 Fenobucarb 26.7% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Flubendiamide 5.3% 32.5% SE 200+4+40 750 12.00 1.58 90.1 1.60 92
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 5.28 67 5.60 72
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Flubendiamide 20% WG 50% EC + 20% WG 750 + 50 1500 + 250 12.00 6.56 59 6.40 68
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Flubendiamide 20% WG 5% SG + 20% WG 10 + 50 200 + 250 14.00 4.80 70 4.60 77
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 14.00 14.88 7 17.60 12
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 8.64 46 10.00 50
T9 Flubendiamide 20% WG 20% WG 50 250 13.00 9.60 40 11.00 45
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 14.00 16.00 20.00

Table 73: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ME 150+11+14 1000 7.00 1.01 92.2 0.90 94
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ME 230+9+10 1000 7.00 1.17 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ME 180+6+6 1000 8.00 1.24 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % WDG 150+11+14 1000 9.00 1.17 91 1.02 93.2
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% WDG 230+9+10 1000 7.00 1.04 92 0.90 94
T6 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% WDG 180+6+6 1000 7.00 0.98 92.5 0.78 94.8
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % EW 150+11+14 1000 9.00 1.04 92 0.93 93.8
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% EW 230+9+10 1000 8.00 0.91 93 0.90 94
T9 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% EW 180+6+6 1000 8.00 0.87 93.3 0.75 95
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ZW 150+11+14 1000 9.00 1.17 91 1.20 92
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ZW 230+9+10 1000 7.00 1.14 91.2 1.05 93
T12 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ZW 180+6+6 1000 7.00 1.04 92 0.98 93.5
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 4.42 66 4.65 69
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 50% EC + 05 % EC 750 + 15 1500 + 300 7.00 3.77 71 3.60 76
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 5% SG + 05 % EC 11 + 15 220 + 300 7.00 5.07 61 5.25 65
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 7.80 40 8.25 45
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 11.70 10 13.05 13
T18 Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 05 % EC 15 300 8.00 8.58 34 9.15 39
T19 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 9.00 13.00 15.00

Table 74: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ME 150+11+14 1000 11.00 1.40 90 1.44 92
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ME 230+9+10 1000 11.00 1.23 91.2 1.22 93.2
T3 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ME 180+6+6 1000 10.00 1.12 92 0.94 94.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % WDG 150+11+14 1000 10.00 1.26 91 1.30 92.8
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9%WDG 230+9+10 1000 9.00 1.09 92.2 1.26 93
T6 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2%WDG 180+6+6 1000 10.00 0.98 93 1.08 94
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % EW 150+11+14 1000 10.00 1.40 90 1.44 92
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% EW 230+9+10 1000 11.00 1.23 91.2 1.22 93.2
T9 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% EW 180+6+6 1000 10.00 0.98 93 1.08 94
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ZW 150+11+14 1000 11.00 1.40 90 1.44 92
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ZW 230+9+10 1000 11.00 1.26 91 1.35 92.5
T12 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ZW 180+6+6 1000 11.00 1.12 92 1.26 93
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 5.32 62 6.12 66
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 50% EC + 05 % EC 750 + 15 1500 + 300 9.00 6.72 52 7.74 57
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 5% SG + 05 % EC 11 + 15 220 + 300 10.00 4.20 70 4.32 76
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 10.00 11.48 18 13.86 23
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 8.12 42 9.90 45
T18 Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 05 % EC 15 300 10.00 8.68 38 10.62 41
T19 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 11.00 14.00 18.00

Table 75: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ME 150+11+14 1000 7.00 0.82 91.8 0.78 94
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ME 230+9+10 1000 6.00 0.90 91 0.83 93.6
T3 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ME 180+6+6 1000 6.00 0.95 90.5 0.91 93
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % WDG 150+11+14 1000 8.00 0.90 91 1.04 92
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% WDG 230+9+10 1000 8.00 0.80 92 0.91 93
T6 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% WDG 180+6+6 1000 6.00 0.76 92.4 0.78 94
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % EW 150+11+14 1000 6.00 1.00 90 1.04 92
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% EW 230+9+10 1000 7.00 0.90 91 0.94 92.8
T9 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% EW 180+6+6 1000 8.00 0.84 91.6 0.91 93
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ZW 150+11+14 1000 7.00 0.80 92 0.91 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ZW 230+9+10 1000 6.00 0.78 92.2 0.86 93.4
T12 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ZW 180+6+6 1000 6.00 0.70 93 0.78 94
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 3.80 62 4.42 66
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 50% EC + 05 % EC 750 + 15 1500 + 300 8.00 2.80 72 2.73 79
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 5% SG + 05 % EC 10 + 15 200 + 300 6.00 4.20 58 4.81 63
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 6.30 37 7.54 42
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 9.20 8 11.18 14
T18 Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 05 % EC 15 300 8.00 6.80 32 8.32 36
T19 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 10.00 13.00

Table 76: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5% ME 150+11+14 1000 9.00 0.99 91 1.01 92.8
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ME 230+9+10 1000 9.00 0.97 91.2 0.98 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ME 180+6+6 1000 8.00 0.88 92 0.73 94.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5% WDG 150+11+14 1000 7.00 1.10 90 1.26 91
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% WDG 230+9+10 1000 8.00 0.99 91 1.09 92.2
T6 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% WDG 180+6+6 1000 9.00 0.88 92 0.98 93
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5% EW 150+11+14 1000 9.00 0.92 91.6 0.98 93
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% EW 230+9+10 1000 8.00 0.88 92 0.92 93.4
T9 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% EW 180+6+6 1000 7.00 0.81 92.6 0.84 94
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5% ZW 150+11+14 1000 9.00 0.88 92 0.98 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ZW 230+9+10 1000 7.00 0.84 92.4 0.92 93.4
T12 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ZW 180+6+6 1000 8.00 0.81 92.6 0.85 93.9
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 4.18 62 4.62 67
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 50% EC + 05 % EC 750 + 15 1500 + 300 8.00 5.50 50 6.30 55
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 5% SG + 05 % EC 10 + 15 200 + 300 9.00 3.30 70 3.64 74
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 9.46 14 11.48 18
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 8.00 6.60 40 7.98 43
T18 Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 05 % EC 15 300 7.00 7.70 30 8.96 36
T19 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 9.00 11.00 14.00

Table 77: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Lambda-cyhalothrin on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ME 150+11+14 1000 11.00 1.46 91.4 1.47 93
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ME 230+9+10 1000 14.00 1.53 91 1.51 92.8
T3 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ME 180+6+6 1000 11.00 1.68 90.1 1.68 92
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % WDG 150+11+14 1000 12.00 1.36 92 1.47 93
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% WDG 230+9+10 1000 12.00 1.26 92.6 1.41 93.3
T6 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% WDG 180+6+6 1000 14.00 1.19 93 1.26 94
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % EW 150+11+14 1000 14.00 1.70 90 1.68 92
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% EW 230+9+10 1000 11.00 1.53 91 1.51 92.8
T9 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% EW 180+6+6 1000 13.00 1.29 92.4 1.47 93
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1.1% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1.4% 17.5 % ZW 150+11+14 1000 12.00 1.36 92 1.47 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 1% 24.9% ZW 230+9+10 1000 12.00 1.29 92.4 1.34 93.6
T12 Fenobucarb 18% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Lambda-cyhalothrin 0.6% 19.2% ZW 180+6+6 1000 14.00 1.19 93 1.26 94
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 5.95 65 6.30 70
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 50% EC + 05 % EC 750 + 15 1500 + 300 12.00 6.80 60 7.35 65
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 5% SG + 05 % EC 10 + 15 200 + 300 14.00 4.93 71 5.25 75
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 14.00 15.64 8 18.06 14
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 11.00 10.03 41 11.55 45
T18 Lambda-cyhalothrin 05 % EC 05 % EC 15 300 13.00 10.71 37 12.18 42
T19 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 17.00 21.00

Table 78: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids
Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Novaluron 8% 24% SE 150+10+80 1000 9.00 0.88 92 0.84 94
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Novaluron 9% 34.8% SE 250+8+90 1000 8.00 0.99 91 0.98 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Novaluron 6.5% 27.1% SE 200+6+65 1000 7.00 1.05 90.5 1.01 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 4.40 60 4.90 65
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Novaluron 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 33.5 1500 + 750 7.00 4.84 56 5.60 60
T6 Novaluron 5.25 % + Emamectin benzoate 0.9 % SC 5.25% + 0.9% SC 78.75 + 13.5 1500 7.00 8.36 24 10.22 27
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 6.93 37 7.84 44
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 9.68 12 12.04 14
T9 Novaluron 10% EC 10% EC 33.5 375 8.00 10.34 6 12.74 9
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 14.00

Table 79: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Novaluron 8% 24% SE 150+10+80 1000 9.00 1.35 91 1.31 93.1
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Novaluron 9% 34.8% SE 250+8+90 1000 11.00 1.32 91.2 1.29 93.2
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Novaluron 6.5% 27.1% SE 200+6+65 1000 9.00 1.20 92 0.99 94.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.50 70 4.56 76
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Novaluron 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 33.5 1500 + 750 9.00 11.25 25 13.11 31
T6 Novaluron 5.25 % + Emamectin benzoate 0.9 % SC 5.25% + 0.9% SC 78.75 + 13.5 1500 9.00 5.10 66 5.89 69
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 12.30 18 14.63 23
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 8.70 42 10.45 45
T9 Novaluron 10% EC 10% EC 33.5 375 10.00 13.80 8 16.53 13
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 9.00 15.00 19.00

Table 80: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Novaluron 8% 24% SE 150+10+80 1000 8.00 0.77 93 0.75 95
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Novaluron 9% 34.8% SE 250+8+90 1000 6.00 0.99 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Novaluron 6.5% 27.1% SE 200+6+65 1000 6.00 1.05 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 4.18 62 5.25 65
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Novaluron 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 33.5 1500 + 750 8.00 4.84 56 5.85 61
T6 Novaluron 5.25 % + Emamectin benzoate 0.9 % SC 5.25% + 0.9% SC 78.75 + 13.5 1500 6.00 8.36 24 10.95 27
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 6.60 40 8.40 44
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 9.68 12 12.90 14
T9 Novaluron 10% EC 10% EC 33.5 375 8.00 10.23 7 13.50 10
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 15.00

Table 81: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips

No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Novaluron 8% 24% SE 150+10+80 1000 8.00 1.04 92 0.98 93.9
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Novaluron 9% 34.8% SE 250+8+90 1000 9.00 1.14 91.2 1.09 93.2
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Novaluron 6.5% 27.1% SE 200+6+65 1000 8.00 0.99 92.4 0.83 94.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 3.77 71 3.84 76
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Novaluron 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 33.5 1500 + 750 8.00 9.75 25 11.04 31
T6 Novaluron 5.25 % + Emamectin benzoate 0.9 % SC 5.25% + 0.9% SC 78.75 + 13.5 1500 9.00 4.29 67 4.80 70
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 10.66 18 12.00 25
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 7.80 40 8.80 45
T9 Novaluron 10% EC 10% EC 33.5 375 8.00 11.83 9 13.92 13
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 13.00 16.00

Table 82: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Novaluron on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Novaluron 8% 24% SE 150+10+80 1000 14.00 1.55 91.4 1.54 93
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Novaluron 9% 34.8% SE 250+8+90 1000 14.00 1.62 91 1.58 92.8
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.6% + Novaluron 6.5% 27.1% SE 200+6+65 1000 13.00 1.78 90.1 1.76 92
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 6.12 66 6.60 70
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Novaluron 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 33.5 1500 + 750 13.00 7.92 56 8.36 62
T6 Novaluron 5.25 % + Emamectin benzoate 0.9 % SC 5.25% + 0.9% SC 78.75 + 13.5 1500 14.00 5.04 72 4.84 78
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 14.00 16.92 6 20.02 9
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 11.00 10.62 41 11.88 46
T9 Novaluron 10% EC 10% EC 33.5 375 13.00 11.88 34 13.86 37
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 14.00 18.00 22.00

Table 83: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Cotton Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 16.00 1.48 92.2 1.10 95.2
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 16.00 1.67 91.2 1.61 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 17.00 1.90 90 2.00 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 16.00 14.25 25 16.56 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 16.00 5.70 70 5.98 74
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 17.00 7.60 60 8.05 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 15.00 16.15 15 18.86 18
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 16.00 17.29 9 20.47 11
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 16.00 11.40 40 13.11 43
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 3 leaves/plant) 16.00 19.00 23.00

Table 84: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 9.00 0.90 91.8 0.90 94
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 8.00 0.99 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 9.00 1.05 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 5.39 51 6.75 55
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 8.00 2.86 74 3.30 78
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 8.00 4.40 60 5.10 66
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 6.16 44 7.80 48
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 10.23 7 13.35 11
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 7.00 5.50 50 6.90 54
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 15.00

Table 85: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 9.00 1.30 90 1.28 92
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 10.00 1.14 91.2 1.20 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 9.00 1.12 91.4 0.96 94
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.81 63 5.28 67
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 8.00 6.37 51 7.04 56
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 8.00 3.90 70 4.16 74
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 11.70 10 13.92 13
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 9.00 7.28 44 8.16 49
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 9.00 7.80 40 8.64 46
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 10.00 13.00 16.00

Table 86: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Cotton Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 13.00 1.05 93 0.88 95.1
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 12.00 1.35 91 1.26 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 12.00 1.50 90 1.33 92.6
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 12.00 11.70 22 12.96 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 10.00 5.10 66 5.22 71
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 13.00 6.15 59 6.30 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 13.00 12.90 14 14.58 19
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 12.00 13.65 9 15.84 12
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 12.00 9.00 40 9.90 45
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 3 leaves/plant) 13.00 15.00 18.00

Table 87: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Chilli Crop against Aphid

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphid Aphid
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 9.00 1.08 91 1.17 92.2
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 7.00 1.06 91.2 0.90 94
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 8.00 1.20 90 1.31 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 9.12 24 10.80 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 9.00 3.60 70 3.90 74
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 9.00 4.80 60 5.25 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 10.20 15 12.30 18
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 10.92 9 13.35 11
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 9.00 7.32 39 8.55 43
T10 UTC (mean of aphids at 5 leaves/plant) 9.00 12.00 15.00

Table 88: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Chilli Crop against Jassids
TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 8.00 0.90 91.8 0.83 94.8
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 8.00 0.99 91 1.12 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 7.00 0.88 92 0.78 95.1
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 5.39 51 7.04 56
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 7.00 2.86 74 3.36 79
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 6.00 4.40 60 5.28 67
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 6.60 40 8.96 44
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 10.34 6 14.40 10
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 8.00 5.50 50 6.88 57
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 11.00 16.00

Table 89: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Chilli Crop against Thrips
TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips

No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 9.00 1.20 90 1.28 92
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 8.00 1.06 91.2 1.20 92.5
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 8.00 0.96 92 0.91 94.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 9.00 4.44 63 5.28 67
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 8.00 5.88 51 7.04 56
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 9.00 3.60 70 3.52 78
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 10.92 9 13.76 14
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 6.72 44 8.16 49
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 8.00 7.20 40 8.64 46
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 12.00 16.00

Table 90: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Chilli Crop against Whitefly
TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 10.00 0.94 93.3 0.93 95.1
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 8.00 1.23 91.2 1.33 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 8.00 1.37 90.2 1.41 92.6
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 9.00 11.06 21 13.68 28
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 10.00 4.76 66 5.51 71
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 10.00 5.74 59 6.65 65
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 12.04 14 14.82 22
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 8.00 12.74 9 16.53 13
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 10.00 8.26 41 10.26 46
T10 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 10.00 14.00 19.00

Table 91: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Profenofos on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Profenofos 20% 36% EC 150+10+200 1000 12.00 1.31 92.3 1.22 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Profenofos 23% 46.7 % EC 230+7+230 1000 12.00 1.26 91 1.33 93
T3 Fenobucarb 18.5% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Profenofos 18.5% 37.5 % EC 185+5+185 1000 13.00 1.39 90.1 1.48 92.2
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 4.76 66 5.51 71
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC + 50% EC 750 + 500 1500 + 1000 13.00 7.14 49 8.36 56
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.5% + Profenofos 35% WDG 1.5 + 35% WDG 10.5 + 245 700 14.00 3.78 73 4.33 77.2
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 13.00 13.16 6 16.72 12
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 7.98 43 10.07 47
T9 Profenofos 50% EC 50% EC 500 1000 13.00 9.10 35 11.59 39
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 14.00 17.00 21.00

Table 92: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 8.00 0.94 92.2 0.90 94
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 8.00 1.08 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 7.00 1.14 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 9.00 4.32 64 4.80 68
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 9.00 5.28 56 5.70 62
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 150 220 + 300 7.00 9.60 20 11.25 25
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 7.44 38 8.40 44
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 8.00 11.28 6 13.65 9
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 8.00 10.80 10 13.05 13
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 9.00 12.00 15.00

Table 93: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 10.00 1.34 90.4 1.24 93.1
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 11.00 1.23 91.2 1.04 94.2
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 9.00 1.12 92 0.85 95.3
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 4.20 70 4.32 76
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 9.00 11.20 20 13.32 26
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 150 220 + 300 9.00 4.76 66 5.58 69
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 12.04 14 13.86 23
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 8.12 42 9.90 45
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 10.00 12.88 8 15.66 13
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 10.00 14.00 18.00

Table 94: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 7.00 0.86 92.2 0.87 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 6.00 0.99 91 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 6.00 1.05 90.5 1.08 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 3.74 66 4.65 69
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 8.00 5.28 52 6.15 59
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 150 200 + 300 6.00 8.80 20 11.25 25
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 7.48 32 9.30 38
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 10.34 6 13.50 10
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 8.00 9.79 11 12.75 15
T10 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 11.00 15.00

Table 95: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips

No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 9.00 1.40 90 1.17 93.1
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 9.00 1.23 91.2 0.99 94.2
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 8.00 1.12 92 0.85 95
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 10.00 4.20 70 4.08 76
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 8.00 11.06 21 12.75 25
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 150 200 + 300 9.00 4.76 66 5.27 69
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 12.04 14 13.09 23
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 8.68 38 9.86 42
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 8.00 12.88 8 14.62 14
T10 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 10.00 14.00 17.00

Table 96: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 10.00 1.70 90 1.68 92
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 12.00 1.45 91.5 1.47 93
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 11.00 1.19 93 0.97 95.4
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 5.10 70 5.46 74
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 10.00 13.94 18 15.54 26
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 10 + 150 200 + 300 10.00 6.12 64 6.51 69
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 15.64 8 18.48 12
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 11.00 10.88 36 12.18 42
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 12.00 15.30 10 18.06 14
T10 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 17.00 21.00

Table 97: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Paddy Crop against BPH

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha BPH BPH
No of BPH No of BPH % ROC No of BPH % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 15.00 1.37 90.2 1.26 93
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 16.00 1.23 91.2 1.08 94
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 15.00 1.26 91 1.19 93.4
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 13.00 7.70 45 9.36 48
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 14.00 4.90 65 5.40 70
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 150 220 + 300 13.00 6.16 56 6.84 62
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 16.00 8.26 41 10.08 44
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 13.00 12.88 8 15.84 12
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 16.00 7.00 50 7.92 56
T10 UTC (mean of BPH at per hill) 14.00 19.00 26.00

Table 98: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pymetrozine on Paddy Crop against leaf folder

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha leaf folder leaf folder
% leaf damage % leaf damage % ROC % leaf damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 1% + Pymetrozine 6% 22 % WDG 150+10+60 1000 13.00 1.96 86 1.98 89
T2 Fenobucarb 25% + Emamectin benzoate 0.8% + Pymetrozine 7.5% 33.3 % WDG 250+8+75 1000 12.00 1.88 86.6 1.80 90
T3 Fenobucarb 20% + Emamectin benzoate 0.5% + Pymetrozine 9% 29.5 % WDG 200+5+90 1000 15.00 1.82 87 1.69 90.6
T4 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 12.00 6.16 56 5.76 68
T5 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50% EC + 50 % WG 750 + 150 1500 + 300 14.00 12.32 12 15.30 15
T6 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pymetrozine 50 % WG 5% SG + 50% WG 11 + 150 220 + 300 15.00 7.56 46 8.10 55
T7 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 12.74 9 16.02 11
T8 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 12.00 8.40 40 9.54 47
T9 Pymetrozine 50 % WG 50 % WG 150 300 14.00 13.02 7 16.56 8
T10 UTC (mean of % leaf damage/05 hill) 13.00 17.00 22.00

Table 99: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Cotton Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids
Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 14.00 1.26 93 0.99 95.5
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 16.00 1.58 91.2 1.54 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 14.00 1.80 90 1.91 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 16.00 1.62 91 1.76 92
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 16.00 1.44 92 1.47 93.3
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 14.00 1.30 92.8 1.32 94
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 15.00 1.76 90.2 1.76 92
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 16.00 1.64 90.9 1.67 92.4
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 14.00 1.62 91 1.54 93
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 14.00 1.44 92 1.54 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 15.00 1.30 92.8 1.45 93.4
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 15.00 1.26 93 1.23 94.4
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 16.00 13.50 25 15.84 28
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 16.00 6.12 66 6.38 71
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 11 + 50 220 + 500 14.00 6.84 62 7.70 65
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 15.00 15.30 15 18.04 18
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 16.00 16.38 9 19.58 11
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 14.00 12.06 33 13.64 38
T19 UTC (mean of aphids at 3 leaves/plant) 14.00 18.00 22.00

Table 100: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Cotton Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 6.00 0.96 92 0.88 94.5
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 8.00 1.08 91 1.12 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 7.00 1.14 90.5 1.15 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 7.00 1.20 90 1.44 91
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 8.00 1.08 91 1.28 92
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 6.00 0.98 91.8 1.12 93
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 7.00 0.96 92 1.06 93.4
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 6.00 0.86 92.8 0.96 94
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 6.00 0.84 93 0.93 94.2
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 7.00 1.20 90 1.44 91
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 7.00 1.08 91 1.28 92
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 7.00 1.06 91.2 1.15 92.8
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 7.00 4.32 64 5.12 68
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 8.00 3.00 75 3.52 78
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 11 + 50 220 + 500 6.00 4.80 60 5.44 66
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 7.00 6.72 44 8.16 49
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 6.00 11.16 7 14.24 11
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 6.00 7.20 40 9.12 43
T19 UTC (mean of jassids at 3 leaves/plant) 7.00 12.00 16.00

Table 101: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Cotton Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips Thrips
No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 10.00 1.49 90.1 1.52 92
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 9.00 1.32 91.2 1.35 92.9
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 10.00 1.20 92 1.12 94.1
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 10.00 1.20 92 1.33 93
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 10.00 1.05 93 1.14 94
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 11.00 0.95 93.7 0.87 95.4
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 11.00 1.20 92 1.33 93
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 9.00 1.17 92.2 1.24 93.5
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 10.00 1.05 93 0.93 95.1
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 11.00 1.50 90 1.52 92
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 9.00 1.35 91 1.39 92.7
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 9.00 1.32 91.2 1.33 93
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 10.00 5.55 63 6.27 67
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 10.00 7.50 50 8.55 55
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 11 + 50 220 + 500 11.00 4.80 68 4.94 74
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 11.00 13.65 9 16.53 13
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 9.00 9.00 40 10.26 46
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 10.00 10.20 32 11.78 38
T19 UTC (mean of thrips at 3 leaves/plant) 11.00 15.00 19.00

Table 102: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Cotton Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 14.00 1.28 92 1.12 94.4
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.39 91.3 1.40 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 12.00 1.44 91 1.42 92.9
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 14.00 1.44 91 1.60 92
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.31 91.8 1.40 93
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 13.00 1.28 92 1.00 95
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 12.00 1.60 90 1.80 91
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 11.00 1.57 90.2 1.60 92
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 13.00 1.44 91 1.40 93
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 13.00 1.28 92 1.40 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.15 92.8 1.32 93.4
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 12.00 1.12 93 1.00 95
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 11 1500 + 220 14.00 13.44 16 15.20 24
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 100 1500 + 1000 12.00 6.08 62 6.40 68
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 11 + 100 220 + 1000 13.00 6.56 59 7.20 64
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 12.80 20 15.00 25
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 11 220 11.00 14.56 9 17.40 13
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 100 1000 13.00 9.60 40 11.00 45
T19 UTC (mean of whitefly at 3 leaves/plant) 13.00 16.00 20.00

Table 103: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Chilli Crop against Aphids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Aphids Aphids
No of aphids No of aphids % ROC No of aphids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 8.00 0.96 92 0.87 94.2
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 7.00 1.06 91.2 1.05 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 8.00 1.20 90 1.31 91.3
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 8.00 1.08 91 1.05 93
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.96 92 0.90 94
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 9.00 0.86 92.8 0.75 95
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 8.00 0.96 92 0.90 94
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.84 93 0.84 94.4
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 6.00 0.74 93.8 0.72 95.2
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 7.00 1.20 90 1.35 91
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 6.00 1.08 91 1.20 92
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 6.00 1.01 91.6 1.05 93
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 9.00 25 10.80 28
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 7.00 4.56 62 4.50 70
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 10 + 50 200 + 500 9.00 5.04 58 5.25 65
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 10.20 15 12.30 18
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 11.04 8 13.35 11
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 6.00 8.04 33 9.30 38
T19 UTC (mean of aphids at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 12.00 15.00

Table 104: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Chilli Crop against Jassids

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Jassids Jassids
No of Jassids No of Jassids % ROC No of Jassids % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 6.00 0.88 92 0.84 94
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.99 91 0.98 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 7.00 1.08 90.2 1.01 92.8
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 6.00 1.10 90 1.12 92
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 6.00 0.99 91 0.98 93
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 5.00 0.88 92 0.78 94.4
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 6.00 0.77 93 0.84 94
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.73 93.4 0.73 94.8
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 8.00 0.66 94 0.67 95.2
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 7.00 0.88 92 0.84 94
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.77 93 0.77 94.5
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 7.00 0.70 93.6 0.66 95.3
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 6.00 3.96 64 4.34 69
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 6.00 2.75 75 2.94 79
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 10 + 50 200 + 500 5.00 4.40 60 4.76 66
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 6.00 6.16 44 7.42 47
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 7.00 10.12 8 12.46 11
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 8.00 6.82 38 8.12 42
T19 UTC (mean of jassids at 5 leaves/plant) 7.00 11.00 14.00

Table 105: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Chilli Crop against Thrips

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Thrips
Thrips

No of Thrips No of Thrips % ROC No of Thrips % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 8.00 1.29 90.1 1.30 91.9
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 9.00 1.14 91.2 1.14 92.9
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 8.00 1.04 92 0.96 94
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 7.00 1.04 92 1.12 93
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 8.00 0.91 93 0.96 94
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 9.00 0.83 93.6 0.77 95.2
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 9.00 1.30 90 1.28 92
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 9.00 1.17 91 1.12 93
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 8.00 1.04 92 0.96 94
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 8.00 1.04 92 1.12 93
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 7.00 0.91 93 0.96 94
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 7.00 0.78 94 0.72 95.5
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 7.00 4.81 63 5.28 67
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 8.00 6.37 51 7.20 55
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 10 + 50 200 + 500 9.00 4.16 68 4.00 75
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 9.00 11.83 9 13.60 15
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 7.93 39 8.96 44
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 8.00 9.10 30 10.08 37
T19 UTC (mean of thrips at 5 leaves/plant) 8.00 13.00 16.00

Table 106: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Chilli Crop against Whitefly

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha Whitefly Whitefly
No of Whitefly No of Whitefly % ROC No of Whitefly % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 9.00 1.04 92 0.94 94.8
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 8.00 1.13 91.3 1.26 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 8.00 1.17 91 1.31 92.7
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 8.00 1.30 90 1.44 92
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 7.00 1.17 91 1.08 94
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 9.00 1.04 92 1.01 94.4
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 8.00 0.91 93 1.08 94
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 9.00 0.78 94 0.90 95
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 9.00 0.75 94.2 0.81 95.5
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 9.00 1.17 91 1.44 92
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 8.00 1.04 92 1.26 93
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 8.00 0.91 93 1.19 93.4
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 8.00 10.92 16 13.68 24
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 7.00 4.68 64 5.40 70
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 10 + 50 200 + 500 9.00 5.46 58 6.48 64
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 8.00 10.66 18 14.04 22
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 9.00 11.83 9 15.48 14
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 9.00 7.80 40 9.90 45
T19 UTC (mean of whitefly at 5 leaves/plant) 9.00 13.00 18.00

Table 107: Efficacy of Insecticidal Composition Fenobucarb + Emamectin benzoate + Pyriproxyfen on Chilli Crop against fruit borer

TN Treatments Formulation Dose Before Application Observation at 7 DAA Observation at 14 DAA
g.a.i / ha gm - ml /ha fruit borer
fruit borer
% fruit damage % fruit damage % ROC % fruit damage % ROC
T1 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % ME 150+9+44 1000 14.00 1.28 92 1.00 95
T2 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % ME 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.17 91 1.26 93
T3 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % ME 190+7+65 1000 12.00 1.29 90.1 1.40 92.2
T4 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % WDG 150+9+44 1000 12.00 1.28 92 1.40 93
T5 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % WDG 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.12 93 1.20 94
T6 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % WDG 190+7+65 1000 14.00 1.02 93.6 1.00 95
T7 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % SC 150+9+44 1000 12.00 1.28 92 1.20 94
T8 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % SC 230+4+86 1000 12.00 1.12 93 1.16 94.2
T9 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % SC 190+7+65 1000 13.00 1.06 93.4 0.92 95.4
T10 Fenobucarb 15% + Emamectin benzoate 0.9% + Pyriproxyfen 4.4% 20.3 % EW 150+9+44 1000 12.00 1.60 90 1.60 92
T11 Fenobucarb 23% + Emamectin benzoate 0.4% + Pyriproxyfen 8.6% 32 % EW 230+4+86 1000 13.00 1.44 91 1.44 92.8
T12 Fenobucarb 19% + Emamectin benzoate 0.7% + Pyriproxyfen 6.5% 26.2 % EW 190+7+65 1000 12.00 1.28 92 1.40 93
T13 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 50% EC + 5% SG 750 + 10 1500 + 200 12.00 4.68 64 5.76 68
T14 Fenobucarb 50% EC + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 50% EC + 10% EC 750 + 50 1500 + 500 12.00 11.31 13 14.76 18
T15 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG + Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 5% SG + 10% EC 10 + 50 200 + 500 14.00 4.42 66 5.40 70
T16 Fenobucarb 50% EC 50% EC 750 1500 12.00 11.96 8 15.84 12
T17 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 5% SG 10 200 12.00 8.06 38 10.44 42
T18 Pyriproxyfen 10% EC 10 % EC 50 500 13.00 12.22 6 16.38 9
T19 UTC (Mean count of % fruit damage / 05 plants) 12.00 16.00 20.00

It is evident from the above tables 45-107 that the insecticidal compositions of the present invention gave excellent control on crops against tested insects wherein all the prepared compositions found superior as compared to the reference products (solo or binary compositions).

It has also been found that use of insecticidal compositions of present invention not only gave better efficiency by using low a.i., content compared to binary and solo composition but also broaden the spectrum of compositions as the solo and binary compositions are not providing sufficient insect control in given duration.

It has also been found that the insecticidal compositions of the present invention provides a readymade solution to control the insect pests as described in above tables in one go.

From the foregoing it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitations with respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.
,CLAIMS:We Claim:
1. An insecticidal compositions comprising:
a) first insecticide A, 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate;
b) second insecticide B, Emamectin or its salts;
c) third insecticide C, selected from Chlorantraniliprole or Dinotefuran or Flonicamid or Flubendiamide or Lambda-cyhalothrin or Novaluron or Profenofos or Pymetrozine or Pyriproxyfen; and
d) agriculturally acceptable excipients.

2. The insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein Emamectin salts is Emamectin benzoate.

3. The insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein,
a) 2-sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate is present in an amount in the range from 5 to 35% w/w;
b) Emamectin benzoate is present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 3% w/w;
c) Chlorantraniliprole is present in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Dinotefuran is present in an amount in the range from 1-5% w/w or Flonicamid is present in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Flubendiamide is present in an amount in the range from 1-10% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin is present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 5% w/w or Novaluron is present in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Profenofos is present in an amount in the range from 10-30% w/w or Pymetrozine is present in an amount in the range from 2-15% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in an amount in the range from 1-15% w/w.

4. The insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein,
a) 2- sec-butylphenyl methylcarbamate is present in an amount in the range from 15 to 25% w/w;
b) Emamectin benzoate is present in an amount in the range from 0.4 to 1% w/w;
c) Chlorantraniliprole is present in an amount in the range from 2.6-5% w/w or Dinotefuran is present in an amount in the range from 1.4-2.7% w/w or Flonicamid is present in an amount in the range from 3.4-6.6% w/w or Flubendiamide is present in an amount in the range from 3-5% w/w or Lambda-cyhalothrin is present in an amount in the range from1 to 3.4% w/w or Novaluron is present in an amount in the range from 6.5-9% w/w or Profenofos is present in an amount in the range from 18.5-23% w/w or Pymetrozine is present in an amount in the range from 6-9% w/w or Pyriproxyfen is present in an amount in the range from 4.4-8.6% w/w.

5. The insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 1, wherein the compositions are formulated as Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Wettable powder (WP), a mixed formulation of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed formulation of CS and SE (ZE), a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW) preferably Suspension concentrate (SC), Water dispersible granules (WDG/WG), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Capsule suspension (CS), Micro-emulsion (ME), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), and a mixed formulation of CS and EW (ZW).

6. The insecticidal compositions, as claimed in claim 1, wherein the agriculturally acceptable excipient is selected from the group comprising dispersing agent, wetting agent, emulsifier, dispersing cum wetting agent, disintegrating agent, anti-freezing agent, anti-settling agent, capsule forming monomer I and II, defoamer, biocide, thickener, solvent, diluent or filler.

7. The insecticidal compositions as claimed in claim 6, wherein,
a) the dispersing agent is selected from the group comprising sodium salts of naphthalene sulfonates condensed with formaldehyde, ligno-sulphonate, sodium lignosulphonate, modified sodium lignosulphonate, sodium polycarboxylate, high molecular weight purified sodium ligno-sulphonate, modified styrene acrylic polymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate amine salt, tristyrylphenol ethoxylates, polymethyl methacrylate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 20% w/w;
b) the wetting agent is selected from the group comprising sodium isopropyl naphthalene sulphonate, sodium alkyl dibutyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium butyl naphthalene sulfonate, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol, polyoxyethylene alkyl ether or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 10% w/w;
c) the emulsifier is selected from the group comprising tristyrylphenol ethoxylated, calcium salt of alkyl benzene sulfonate, non-ionic ethopropoxylated polyarylphenol, blend of non-ionic and anionic emulsifier (proprietary blend), castor oil ethoxylates or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 30% w/w;
d) the dispersing cum wetting agent is selected from the group comprising Jeemox SCR (Proprietary blend of m/s Jeevan chemical pvt ltd.), proprietary blend of phosphate ester and sodium naphthalene, sulphate formaldehyde condensate, modified styrene acrylic polymeric or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 2 to 10% w/w;
e) the disintegrating agent is selected from the group comprising ammonium sulphate, lactose or a combination thereof and present in an amount from 10-30% w/w;
f) the anti-freezing agent is selected from the group comprising glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, monoethylene glycol or a combinations thereof and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 10% w/w;
g) the anti-settling agent is selected from the group comprising precipitated silica, organic bentonite, polyolefin particles and fumed silica and present in an amount in the range from 1 to 7% w/w;
h) the capsule forming monomer I is selected from the group comprising polyisocyanate, toluene di-isocyanate and tri-isocyanate present in an amount in the range from 0.5 to 3% w/w;
i) the capsule forming monomer II is selected from the group comprising ethylenediamine, diethylenetetramine and hexaethylenediamine present in an amount in the range from 0.2 to 2% w/w;
j) the antifoamer/defoamer is selected from the group comprising polydimethylsiloxane antifoam emulsion, silicon emulsion, polysiloxane emulsion or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 3% w/w;
k) the biocide/preservative is selected from the group comprising 20% aqueous dipropylene glycol solution of 1, 2-benzisothiazolin-3-one, formaldehyde, isothiazolinone or a combinations thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.01 to 1% w/w;
l) the thickener is selected from the group comprising xanthan gum, welan gum, guar gum, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxyvinyl polymer, acrylic polymer, starch derivative, polysaccharide, high purity silica, white carbon or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 0.1 to 0.5% w/w;
m) the solvent is selected from the group comprising solvent C-9, high solvency C-11 aromatic fluid, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), dipropylene glycol methyl ether or a combination thereof and present in an amount in the range from 1-25% w/w or the first solvent is present in an amount 1-25% w/w and second solvent is present in an amount quantity sufficient;
n) the filler is selected from the group comprising silica, precipitated silica, sodium bicarbonate, china clay, lactose, bentonite clay, kaolin, diatomaceous earth or a combination thereof and present in an amount quantity sufficient, provided when filler combinations is used then first filler is present in an amount in the range from 1-20% w/w and second filler is present in an amount quantity sufficient; and
o) the diluent is demineralised water and present in an amount quantity sufficient.