DESCRIPTION
METHOD AND DEVICE
FOR STEERING TRUCK OF RAILWAY VEHICLE, AND TRUCK
TECHNICAL FIELD
[00011
The present invention relates to a steering method in which a
steering device intentionally turns two axles of a truck of a railway vehicle
10 relative to a frame of the truck, the two axles being arranged in the front and
rear of the truck in a direction of running of the railway vehicle, and the
steering device that realizes the steering method. The present invention
further relates to a truck equipped with the steering device, and more
particularly to a linear truck that is powered by a linear induction motor.
15 In the following explanation, the front side, or direction, with respect to the
direction of running of the railway vehicle will be simply called "front" or
"forward" and the rear side, or direction, with respect to the direction of
running of the railway vehicle will be simply called "rear" or "rearward".
20 BACKGROUND ART
[00021
When a railway vehicle runs on a curved track, a steering device of a
truck of the railway vehicle turns two axles, arranged in the front and rear of
the truck, in a yawing direction. The object of this turning is to reduce a
25 turning resistance (lateral pressure) acting on the wheels attached to the
axles.
[OOO~]
The steering devices currently in commercial use turn the two axles
symmetrically in the front and rear. Moreover, these steering devices set a
30 steering angle of the axles to an angle that is geometrically most ideal
(hereinafter, "radial steering angle").
[0004]
Referring to FIG. 14, assuming a steering angle to be "P", a radius of
curvature of the curved track to be "R", and a distance between a center of a
6 truck 2 and a center of axle 3 to be "a", the radial steering angle, which is a
steering angle at which the wheels attached to the axles will be in the most -
ideal steering state when running on the curved track, can be represented by
the following Equation 1. In FIG. 14, 1 represents a vehicle body and 4
represents a track.
10 [00051
[Equation 11
= sin- (a/ R)
[0006]
However, when the truck is running on the curved track, the actual
16 steering angles of the axles are insufficient due to a resistance to turning of
the truck and the vehicle body. Therefore, if the steering angle is set at the
radial steering angle, the axles do not turn to such an extent that they point
to a center of curvature "C" of the curved track.
[00071
To address the above issue, Patent Reference 1 proposes a technique
of setting the steering angle to an angle that is larger than the radial
steering angle. By setting the steering angle at the larger angle, it is
possible to compensate for the insufficiency in the steering angle due to
resistance in various parts such as resistance between the vehicle body and
the truck, resistance within the steering device, and resistance within an
axle box support device.
[00081
When the set steering angle is larger than the radial steering angle
as disclosed in the technique of Patent Reference 1, at the center of the
curved track, a lateral pressure from an outer rail on a front axle of a front
truck of the railway vehicle reduces. In the following explanation, in a
railway vehicle equipped with two trucks, one in the front and the other in
the rear of the railway vehicle, each having two sets of axles, the axles will be
referred to as a first axle, a second axle, a third axle, and a fourth axle in
5 order from front to rear.
[00091
However, even in the technique proposed in Patent Reference 1, the
fact remains that the front and rear axles are turned symmetrically.
Therefore, when the railway vehicle enters a straight portion at an exit of
10 the curved track (hereinafter, "exit straight portion"), as shown in FIG. 15,
the railway vehicle enters in an over-steered posture, whereby the lateral
pressure from the inner rail on the first axle increases. In FIG. 15, 2a
represents the £rant truck, 2b represents a rear truck, 3a represents the &st '
axle, 3b represents the second axle, 3c represents the third axle, 3d
15 represents the fourth axle, 4a represents the inner rail, and 4b represents
the outer rail.
PRIOR ART REFERENCES
PATENT REFERENCES
20 roo101
Patent Reference 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. H10-203364
SIJMMARY OF THE INVENTION
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
25 [0011]
A problem to be solved by the present invention is, in a steering
device that turns the front and rear axles symmetrically, when the steering
angle is increased to further improve the performance, the lateral pressure
from the inner rail on the first axle disadvantageously increases as the
30 railway vehicle is in an over-steered posture when the railway vehicle enters
the exit straight portion.
MEANS FOR SOLVING THIS PROBLEM
[00121
In order to solve the issue of an over-steered state at the exit straight
portion in addition to enhancing the curve passage performance than when a
steering angle of front and rear axles is set at a radial steering angle, a
steering method for a truck of a railway vehicle according to the present
invention intentionally turns two axles of the truck relative to a frame of the
10 truck. The two axles are arranged at the front and rear of the truck.
Moreover, the steering method includes steering the axles such that a
steering angle of an axle at the front is larger than a steering angle of an axle
at the rear.
[00131
In the steering method for the truck of a railway vehicle according to
the present invention, by steering such that the steering angle of the front
axle is larger than the steering angle of the rear axle, the posture of the
truck is shifted toward an under-steered direction, and the over-steered state
at the exit of the curved track is relaxed, leading to suppressing an increase
20 in the lateral pressure from an i ~ eraril . Moreover, the lateral pressure
from an outer rail on the front axle is reduced as the front axle is steered by a
larger angle.
ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION
25 [00141
According to the present invention, the curve passage performance
enhances by decreasing the lateral pressure from the outer rail on the front
axle on the curved track, and an increase in the lateral pressure from the
inner rail on the front axle is suppressed by relaxing the over-steered posture
30 at the exit straight portion of the curved track.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00151
FIG. l(a) is a drawing for explaining a behavior when a steering
5 angle of a front axle is set larger than a steering angle of a rear axle, and FIG.
l(b) is a drawing for explaining the steering reaction forces acting on the
front and rear axles in the situation shown in FIG. l(a);
FIG. 2 is a drawing that shows a change in a yawing angle of a frame
of a truck running on a circular track when the steering angle of the rear
10 axle is set at a radial steering angle, while the steering angle of the front axle
is set at the radial steering angle and at angles that are, respectively, 20%,
30%, 40%, and 50% larger than the radial steering angle;
FIG. 3 is a drawing that shows comparison of lateral pressures from
an inner rail on the front axle at the exit straight portion in which FIG. 3(a)
15 shows comparison of the lateral pressures when the techniques of a
conventional art, the present invention, and Patent Reference 1 are
respectively applied, and FIG. 3(b) shows comparison of the lateral pressures
when the steering angle of the rear axle is set at the radial steering angle,
while the steering angle of the front axle is set at the radial steering angle
20 and at angles that are, respectively, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% larger than the
radial steering angle;
FIG. 4 is a drawing that shows comparison of the lateral pressures
from the outer rail on the front axle when the truck is running on the
circular track when the techniques of the conventional art, the present
25 invention, and Patent Reference 1 are respectively applied;
FIG. 5 is a drawing that shows comparison of tread wear indices of a
third axle when a steering angle of second and fourth axles on the rear is set
at the radial steering angle, while a steering angle of first and third axles on
the front is set at angles that are, respectively, 20%, 30%, and 40% larger
30 than the radial steering angle;
FIG. 6 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and third axles on the
front is set at an angle that is 20% larger than the radial steering angle,
while the steering angle of the second and fourth axles on the rear is set at
5 the radial steering angle and at angles that are, respectively, 10% and 20%
larger than the radial steering angle;
FIG. 7 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and third axles on the
front is set at an angle that is 30% larger than the radial steering angle,
10 while the steering angle of the second and fourth axles on the rear is set at
the radial steering angle and at angles that are, respectively, 5% and 10%
larger than the radial steering angle;
FIG. 8 is a. drawing that shows a range in which a remarkable
advantageous effect of the present invention is achieved when the steering
15 angle of the first and third axles is set larger than the steering angle of the
second and fourth axles;
FIG. 9 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the second and third axles is set
at the radial steering angle, while the steering angle of the first and fourth
20 axles is set at angles that are, respectively, 20%, 30%, and 40% larger than
the radial steering angle;
FIG. 10 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and fourth axles is set at
an angle that is 20% larger than the radial steering angle, while the steering
25 angle of the second and third axles is set at the radial steering angle and at
angles that are, respectively, 5% and 10% larger than the radial steering
angle;
FIG. 11 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and fourth axles is set at
30 an angle that is 30% larger than the radial steering angle, while the steering
angle of the second and third axles is set at the radial steering angle and at
angles that are, respectively, 5%, lo%, and 15% larger than the radial
steering angle;
FIG. 12 is a drawing that shows a range in which remarkable
5 advantageous effect of the present invention is achieved when the steering
angle of the first and fourth axles is set larger than the steering angle of the
second and third axles;
FIG. 13 is a drawing of an exemplary structure of a steering device
capable of realizing a steering method according to the present invention in
10 which FIG. 13(a) is a side view and FIG. 13(b) is a plan view as seen from
back of the steering device;
FIG. 14 is a drawing for explaining the concept of the steering angle;
and
FIG. 15 is a drawing for explaining that, in the technology proposed
15 in Patent Reference 1, when the railway vehicle enters the exit straight
portion, the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the first axle increases.
EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[OOI~I
An object of the present invention is to solve the issue of over-steered
state at the exit straight portion in addition to enhancing the curve passage
performance. This object is achieved by reducing, when a truck is running
on the circular track, a lateral pressure from an outer rail on a front axle by
steering axles such that a steering angle of the front axle is larger than a
25 steering angle of the rear axle.
Embodiment
Coo 171
Exemplary embodiments for embodying the present invention are
30 explained below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 13.
In a conventional truck equipped with a steering device that
symmetrically rotates two axles arranged in the front and rear of the truck,
if the steering angle of the axles is set at the radial steering angle when the
conventional truck runs on the circular truck (hereinafter, "conventional
5 art"), the actual steering angle becomes insufficient.
100 181
On the other hand, if the steering angle is set larger than the radial
steering angle in the conventional truck (hereinafter, "technique of Patent
Reference I"), the posture of the truck becomes over-steered at the exit
10 straight portion leading to an increase in the lateral pressure from the inner
rail on the front axle and obstructing further enhancement of the
performance.
[00191
To address the above issue, the inventors considered setting
15 non-symmetric steering angles for the front and rear axles. In the
technique disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No.
2000-272514, the posture of the truck becomes over-steered when the
steering angle of the rear axle is increased. However, the present invention
focuses on the problem arising due to the over-steering, which cannot be
20 solved by the technique of increasing the steering angle of the rear axle.
[OO~O]
The inventors exploited the fact that different steering reaction
forces are generated at the front and rear of the steering device when the
steering angle of the front axle is set larger than the steering angle of the
25 rear axle. Concretely, when a steering angle a1 of a front axle 12a arranged
in a truck 11 is set larger than a steering angle a2 of a rear axle 12b, i.e.,
when al>az (See, FIG. l(a)), a steering reaction force F1 acting on the front
axle 12a and a steering reaction force F2 acting on the rear axle llb satisfy
an inequality Fl>F2 (See, FIG. l(b)).
30 [00211
As shown in FIG. l(b), due to an imbalance between the steering
reaction forces F1 and F2, a counter force Fs corresponding to a degree of the
imbalance is conveyed to the truck 11 (See, FIG. l(d). This leads to
generation of momentum MI, and the posture of the truck 11 that is running
5 on the circular track changes to the under-steered direction. This change in
the posture of the truck 11 relaxes the over-steered state of the truck 11 at
the exit of the circular track and suppresses the increase in the lateral
pressure from the inner rail. Moreover, because the front axle 12a is
steered by a larger angle, the lateral pressure from the outer rail on the front
10 axle 12a is advantageously reduced. The explanation in this paragraph
relates to the invention disclosed in Claim 1.
Coo221
The invention disclosed in Claim 1 is advantageous in that, it is
possible to suppress the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the front axle
15 12a when the truck 11 is running on the exit straight portion in addition to
reducing the lateral pressure from the outer rail on the front axle 12a when
the truck 11 is running on the circular track.
[00231
A performance of the technique of the conventional art, Patent
20 Reference 1, and the present invention, respectively, were calculated by
simulation and then compared with each other.
Coo241
As a simulation condition, it was assumed that a wheel-type linear
vehicle is running on a curved track of a radius R of 100 meters (m) at a
25 speed V of 35 k&. The lateral pressure from the outer rail on the front
axle at the circular track and the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the
front axle at the straight portion at the exit of the circular track were
employed as parameters for evaluating the safety.
Coo251
FIG. 2 is a drawing that shows a change in a yawing angle of a frame
that was caused to run on the circular track when, relative to the steering
angle of the rear axle that was set at the radial steering angle, the steering
angle a1 of the front axle was set at the radial steering angle and at angles
that were, respectively, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% larger than the radial
5 steering angle. In FIG. 2, the under-steered direction corresponds to the
positive direction of the vertical axis.
[0026]
It is clear from FIG. 2 that, when the steering angle a1 of the front
axle is set larger than the steering angle a2 of the rear axle, the yawing angle
10 of the frame increases in a direction that is opposite to the steering direction
whereby the degree of under-steered posture of the truck further increases.
Loo271
This is attributable to, as explained above, generation of the
momentum M1 because the counterforce corresponding to the degree of the
15 imbalance between the steering reaction forces is conveyed to the truck (See,
FIG. 1). In other words, when the steering angle a1 of the front axle is set
larger than the steering angle a2 of the rear axle, only the steering reaction
force F1 of the front axle increases leading to an increase in the momentum
MI,a nd the degree of under-steered posture of the truck further increases.
20 [0028]
In the techniques of the conventional art and Patent Reference 1 in
which the front and rear axles are rotated symmetrically, the lateral
pressure from the inner rail on the front axle at the exit straight portion
increased with an increase in the steering angle (See, "conventional art" and
25 "Patent Reference 1" in FIG. 3(a)).
[00291
In contrast, in the present invention in which the steering angle a1 of
the front axle is set larger than the steering angle a2 of the rear axle, the
above-explained change in the posture relaxes the over-steered state at the
30 exit straight portion so that the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the
fiont axle changes little from that in the conventional art (See, "conventional
art" and "present invention" in FIG. 3(a)). The lateral pressure from the
inner rail on the front axle changed little even when the steering angle a1 of
the front axle was set at angles that were, respectively, 20%, 30%, 40%, and
6 50% larger than the radial steering angle (See, FIG. 3(b)).
[OO~O]
On the other hand, although the result given by the technique of the
present invention is somewhat inferior to that given by the technique of
Patent Reference 1 with respect to the lateral pressure from the outer rail on
10 the fiont axle when running on the circular track, which is attributable to
the steering of the front axle by a larger angle, the lateral pressure from the
outer rail on the front axle in the technique of the present invention
decreased as compared to the same in the conventional art (See, FIG. 4).
[003 11
15 Thus, as explained above, according to the invention disclosed in
Claim 1, because the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the front axle at
the exit straight portion is suppressed, it is possible to enhance the curve
passage performance.
100321
In practical use, it is necessary to take into account that each railway
vehicle is supported by two trucks, and the curve passage performance needs
to be evaluated by considering the trends of each of the first to fourth axles.
[00331
When one railway vehicle is considered, in the technique of Patent
25 Reference 1, the rear truck tends to be in the over-steered posture due to the
increased steering angle. Accordingly, an attack angle of the third axle
becomes negative leading to insufficient wheel radius difference and low
curve passage performance.
[00341
In view of the above discussion, the predominance of the present
invention with respect to the safety and ease of maintenance will be
explained below by taking into account evaluation of the tread wear index
(Elkins & Eickoff wear index) of the third axle as well.
[0035]
When the trucks are arranged such that the steering angle of the
first and third axles is larger than the steering angle of the second and
fourth axles, the lateral pressure from the outer rail on the first axle at the
curved track and the lateral pressure from the inner rail on the first axle at
the exit straight portion show similar trends as those explained above, and
10 the same advantageous effect is achieved with respect to the safety. The
explanation in this paragraph relates to the invention disclosed in Claim 2.
100361
On the other hand, with respect to a wear index of the third axle,
because the steering angle of the first and third axles on the front is set
16 larger than the steering angle of the second and fourth axles on the rear, the
over-steered posture of the rear track is also relaxed, and there exists a
range in which the wear index as well can be suppressed.
[00371
FIG. 5 is a drawing that shows the tread wear indices of the third
20 axle when the steering angles of the second and fourth axles on the rear were
set at the radial steering angle, while the steering angle of the first and third
axles on the front was set at angles that were, respectively, 20%, 30%, and
40% larger than the radial steering angle.
[00381
2 5 It can be seen from FIG. 5 that, when the steering angle of the second
and fourth axles on the rear was set at the radial steering angle, a maximum
limit value of an amount of increase from the radial steering angle of the
steering angle of the first and third axles on the front is 35.3% and it
corresponds to the same tread wear index as in Patent Reference 1.
30 [00391
FIG. 6 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and third axles on the
fiont was set at an angle that is 20% larger than the radial steering angle,
while the steering angle of the second and fourth axles on the rear was set at
5 the radial steering angle and at angles that were, respectively, 10% and 20%
larger than the radial steering angle.
[OO~O]
FIG. 7 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and third axles on the
10 fiont was set at an angle that is 30% larger than the radial steering angle,
while the steering angle of the second and fourth axles on the rear were set
at the radial steering angle and at angles that were, respectively, 5% and
10% larger than the radial steering angle. -
roo411
It can be seen from FIG. 7 that, when the steering angle of the first
and third axles on the £rant was set at the angle that is 30% larger than the
radial steering angle, a maximum limit value of an amount of increase from
the radial steering angle of the steering angle of the second and fourth axles
on the rear is 8.8% and it corresponds to the same tread wear index as in
20 Patent Reference 1.
roo421
By using the results shown in FIGS. 5 to 7, with respect to the wear
index of the third axle, a limit value that does not exceed the value according
to the technique of Patent Reference 1 is calculated, and conditions that
25 showed reduced wear index of the third axle compared to Patent Reference 1
are shown with a circle and conditions that showed increased wear index are
shown with a cross in FIG. 8.
100431
When the steering angle a1 of the first and third axles is set larger
30 than the steering angle a 2 of the second and fourth axles, a remarkable
advantageous effect of the present invention is obtained in a range in which
the circles are present in FIG. 8. In other words, a remarkable
advantageous effect of the present invention is obtained in a range defined
by a straight line that joins a value where, al>az, when the steering angle of
5 the second and fourth axles is larger than the radial steering angle, the
steering angle of the first and third axles is 36.3% larger than the radial
steering angle when the steering angle of the second and fourth axles is
equal to the radial steering angle, and a value where the steering angle of
the second and fourth axles is 8.8% larger than the radial steering angle
10 when the steering angle of the first and third axles is 30% larger than the
radial steering angle. The explanation in this paragraph relates to the
invention disclosed in Claim 3.
[00441
It should be noted that the direction of running of a railway vehicle
15 may be sometimes reversed. When the direction of running is reversed, the
steering angle of the first and fourth axles can be set larger than the steering
angle of the second and third axles. Even in this case, the trends in the
lateral pressure from the outer rail on the first axle at the curved track and
the lateral pressure from the i ~ eraril on the first axle at the exit straight
20 portion are obtained as before without change, and the tread wear index of
the third axle is reduced.
100451
FIG. 9 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the second and third axles was
25 set at the radial steering angle, while the steering angle of the first and
fourth axles was set at angles that were, respectively, 20%, 30%, and 40%
larger than the radial steering angle.
lo0461
It can be seen from FIG. 9 that, when the steering angle of the second
30 and third axles was set at the radial steering angle, a maximum limit value
of an amount of increase from the radial steering angle of the steering angle
of the first and fourth axles is 39.3% and it corresponds to the same tread
wear index as in Patent Reference 1.
LO0471
FIG. 10 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and fourth axles was set
at an angle that is 20% larger than the radial steering angle, while the
steering angle of the second and third axles was set at the radial steering
angle and at angles that were, respectively, 5% and 10% larger than the
10 radial steering angle.
[0048]
FIG. 11 is a drawing that shows comparison of the tread wear indices
of the third axle when the steering angle of the first and fourth axles was set.
at an angle that is 30% larger than the radial steering angle, while the
steering angle of the second and third axles was set at the radial steering
angle and at angles that were, respectively, 5%, lo%, and 15% larger than
the radial steering angle.
[00491
It can be seen from FIG. 11 that, when the steering angle of the fist
and fourth axles was set at the angle that is 30% larger than the radial
steering angle, a maximum limit value of an amount of increase from the
radial steering angle of the steering angle of the second and fourth axles is
10.8% and it corresponds to the same tread wear index as in Patent
Reference 1.
[00501
By using the results shown in FIGS. 9 to 11, with respect to the wear
index of the third axle, a limit value that does not exceed the value according
to the technique of Patent Reference 1 is calculated, and conditions that
showed reduced tread wear index of the third axle compared to Patent
Reference 1 are shown with a circle and conditions that showed increased
tread wear index are shown with a cross in FIG. 12.
[00511
When the steering angle of the first and fourth axles is set larger
than the steering angle of the second and third axles, remarkable
5 advantageous effect of the present invention is obtained in a range in which
the circles are present as shown in FIG. 12. In other words, remarkable
advantageous effect of the present invention is obtained in a range defined
by a straight line that joins a value where, when the steering angle of the
first and fourth axles is larger than the steering angle of the second and
10 third axles and the steering angle of the second and third axles is larger than
the radial steering angle, and the steering angle of the first and fourth axles
is 39.3% larger than the radial steering angle when the steering angle of the
second and third axles is equal to the radial steering angle, and a value
where the steering angle of the second and third axles is 10.8% larger than
15 the radial steering angle when the steering angle of the first and fourth axles
is 30% larger than the radial steering angle. The explanation in this
paragraph relates to the invention disclosed in Claim 4.
[00521
It is sufficient that a steering device that realizes the above steering
20 method for a truck of a railway vehicle according to the present invention
includes a structure that can set the steering angle of the front axles larger
than the steering angle of the rear axles, and there is no specific limitation
on rest of the structure of the steering device. However, for example, it may
be desirable to employ a steering mechanism shown in FIGS. 13 that
25 includes links.
100531
As shown in FIG. 13,21 represent a lever; and one end of the lever is
coupled to the frame 22 in a rotatable manner. Equidistant points with
respect to a fulcrum 23 of the lever 21 are rotatably coupled to respective
30 axle boxes 25a and 25b of front and rear axles 24a and 24b via first links 26a
and 26b. Moreover, the other end of the lever 22 is rotatably coupled to a
bolster 27 via a second link 26c.
[00541
In this steering mechanism according to the present invention, when
5 running on a curved track, the second link 26c rotates due to the rotation of
the bolster 27 with respect to the fiame 22 causing the lever 21 to rotate
around the fulcrum 23. Because of such rotation of the lever 21 around the
fulcrum 23, the front and rear axles 24a and 24b are steered by a certain
steering angle via the first links 26a and 26b and the axle boxes 25a and 25b.
10 [0056]
In a truck of a railway vehicle that employs a motor as a power
source and includes the steering device according to the present invention,
when steering is performed in a manner shown by solid arrows in FIG. 13, it
is difficult for gear devices and unit brakes to respond to the rotation of the
15 axles.
[00561
Accordingly, it is desirable to use as a truck of a railway vehicle that
includes the steering device according to the present invention, a truck
shown in FIG. 13 that is used for linear vehicles rather than an ordinary
20 truck that employs a motor as a power source. The reason behind this is
that, the steering device can be easily installed on such a truck because the
truck has no gear devices, the truck has disk brakes 28, and the truck is
powered by a linear induction motor 29.
[00571
25 It is needless to say that the present invention is not limited to the
above explained structure and the embodiments can be changed
appropriately within the scope of the technical idea disclosed in the Claims.
DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
30 [00581
Truck
Front axle
Rear axle
Lever
Frame
Fulcrum
Axle
First link
Second link
We claim:
.-.-
1. A steering method for a steering device that intentionally turns two
axles of a truck of a railway vehicle relative to a frame of the truck, the two
axles being arranged in front and rear of the truck with respect to a direction
5 of running of the railway vehicle, the steering method for a truck of a railway
vehicle comprising the step of:
steering the axles such that a steering angle a1 of the front axle is
larger than a steering angle a2 of the rear axle.
10 2. A steering method for a steering device that intentionally turns two
axles of each of two trucks of a railway vehicle relative to a frame of the
respective truck- s, the two trucks being =anged in front and rear of the
railway vehicle with respect to a direction of running of the railway vehicle,
the two axles being arranged in front and rear of each of the trucks with
15 respect to the direction of running, the steering method for a truck of a
railway vehicle comprising the step of:
steering the axles such that a steering angle a1 of a first axle on the
fiont of the front truck and a third axle on the front of the rear truck is larger
than a steering angle a2 of a second axle on the rear of the front truck and a
20 fourth axle on the rear of the rear truck.
3. The steering method for a truck of a railway vehicle according to
Claim 2, wherein the steering includes steering the axles in a range defined
by a straight line that joins
a value where, when the steering angle a2 of the second and fourth
axles on the rear is larger than a radial steering angle, and the steering
angle a1 of the first and third axles is 35.3% larger than the radial steering
angle when the steering angle a2 of the second and fourth axles on the rear is
equal to the radial steering angle, and
a value where the steering angle a2 of the second and fourth axles on
the rear is 8.8% larger than the radial steering angle when the steering
angle a1 of the first and third axles on the front is 30% larger than the radial
steering angle.
5 4. A steering method for a steering device that intentionally turns two
axles of each of two trucks of a railway vehicle relative to a frame of the
respective trucks, the two trucks being arranged in front and rear of the
railway vehicle with respect to a direction of running of the railway vehicle,
the two axles being arranged in front and rear of each of the trucks with
10 respect to the direction of running, the steering method for a truck of a
railway vehicle comprising the step of:
steering the axles in a range defined by a straight line that joins
a value where, when a steering angle of first and fourth axles
is larger than a steering angle of second and third axles and the steering
15 angle of the second and third axles is larger than a radial steering angle, and
the steering angle of the first and fourth axles is 39.3% larger than the radial
steering angle when the steering angle of the second and third axles is equal
to the radial steering angle, and
a value where the steering angle of the second and third axles
20 is 10.8% larger than the radial steering angle when the steering angle of the
first and fourth axles is 30% larger than the radial steering angle.
5. A steering device for a truck of a railway vehicle that realizes the
steering method according to any one of Claims 1 to 4 includes a steering
25 mechanism equipped with a link.
6. A truck for use in a railway vehicle comprising the steering device
according to Claim 5.
7. A linear truck for use in a railway vehicle comprising the steering
device according to Claim 5.