DESC:[0001] The present invention generally relates to an Integrated Test System (ITS) and more specifically relates to a method and a system for controlling a torpedo by utilizing the ITS.

BACKGROUND

[0002] A torpedo is an underwater weapon capable of detecting, tracking, and attacking a target. The torpedo is a collection of subsystems, each with a unique ability to perform various tasks such as (a) identify and analyze the target, (b) propel towards the target with a help of propulsion, (c) seamlessly steer to different depths of a sea/ocean, be it ocean ceiling depth or ocean floor depth, (d) seamlessly steer to different bearing of the sea/ocean with similar depth, be it ocean ceiling depth or ocean floor depth, (e) seamlessly steer to different bearing of the sea/ocean with different depth, be it ocean ceiling depth or ocean floor depth, (f) control a guidance of the torpedo with search phases, homing phase, tracking phase, target lost contact phases, re-attack/attack phases, (g) generate power supply to all the electronic sub-systems, (h) recover the torpedo in case of an exercise version in events of critical system failures or alarming conditions, (i) record data of run of major parameters of the torpedo for analysis post recovery, and (j) receive preliminary details of the target viz., depth, range etc., prior to launch for an initial guidance of the torpedo.
[0003] During torpedo testing, an Integrated Test System (ITS) is employed to perform various crucial functions. The ITS is configured to generate a simulated target signal, which allows for the evaluation of the torpedo’s ability to accurately track and engage targets. The ITS is also configured to read control data to verify the effectiveness of different guidance patterns under various conditions, such as different depths, same depths, and different bearings. Further, the ITS is configured to generate power supply to all electronic sub-systems within the torpedo, ensuring their proper functioning during the torpedo testing. Furthermore, the ITS is configured to read online recorded data to verify the accuracy and integrity of the recorded information. This ensures that the torpedo’s performance aligns with the expected results. Additionally, the ITS is configured to provide preliminary details of the target, such as depth and range, prior to launching the torpedo. These details aid in the initial guidance process, allowing the torpedo to be directed toward the target accurately.
[0004] For instance, consider a naval exercise in which naval depot crew is responsible for the torpedo testing. The naval depot crew prepares the torpedo by connecting the torpedo to the launch computer and to ITS. The naval depot crew activates the existing ITS to begin the testing process. The existing ITS generates a simulated target signal that mimics one or more movements and characteristics of an enemy vessel. The simulated target signal is transmitted to the torpedo, which begins to track the simulated target. The torpedo’s tracking capabilities are then assessed by analyzing its response to the simulated target signal. The existing ITS monitors the torpedo’s behavior and records data on its performance. The existing ITS also verifies the effectiveness of different guidance patterns by comparing the torpedo’s behavior under various conditions. For instance, the existing ITS may test the torpedo’s ability to track a target at different depths and bearings. This allows the naval depot crew to evaluate the torpedo’s performance under different scenarios and identify any areas for improvement. Once the testing is complete, the naval depot crew reviews the data collected by the existing ITS to assess the torpedo’s performance. The naval depot crew can use this data manually to make any necessary adjustments to the torpedo’s guidance system or other components before deploying it in a real-world scenario.
[0005] In addition to the aforementioned functionalities, several problems/limitations are encountered in the existing ITS used for torpedo testing, such as, (a) in order to test the torpedo, a stable direct current power supply is needed (e.g., 170 V Direct Current (DC) power supply). However, if there is a leak in the power supply during testing, it could harm both the torpedo and the ITS. For example, if a power fluctuation occurs during testing, it could cause damage to the torpedo and ITS. Unfortunately, the existing ITS does not have a solution to detect or provide any alternate solution for an unstable direct current power supply. (b) When testing the torpedo, it is required to use an Alternating Current (AC) supply rather than a DC supply. Any significant variations from the earth-neutral voltage could affect the ITS. For instance, if there are spikes in the earth-neutral voltage during testing, it could affect the torpedo’s performance (Any significant variations from the earth-neutral voltage (>3Volts) affect the ITS). Unfortunately, the existing ITS does not have a solution to detect any significant variations from the earth-neutral voltage. (c) The existing ITS displays data parameters for the user to observe and make decisions about the torpedo’s performance. However, manual observation and interpretation can lead to unfair manipulation of the observations. Additionally, the displayed data is not recorded, which means that users can record and/or manipulate the data at their discretion, causing security concerns. Therefore, human intervention can be a problem when analyzing the torpedo’s performance. (d) In the existing ITS, additional test equipment is needed to test the torpedo. The additional test equipment has minimal control and is used to complement the testing process. (e) The existing software used in the existing ITS is not compatible with the latest Windows platforms. This means that users cannot use the ITS on their Windows devices, which could limit their ability to test the torpedo effectively. (f) Testing the torpedo requires generating test cases that are specific to the torpedo being tested. The user must be proficient with the ITS and have detailed knowledge of how to carry out testing. This calls for a highly skilled and competent user to handle the existing ITS effectively, which is not desirable.
[0006] Thus, it is desired to address the above-mentioned limitations and provide a useful alternative for analyzing various functionalities of the torpedo.

SUMMARY

[0007] This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts, in a simplified format, that are further described in the detailed description of the invention. This summary is neither intended to identify key or essential inventive concepts of the invention nor is it intended for determining the scope of the invention.
[0008] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a method for controlling a torpedo is disclosed. The method includes receiving, by an Integrated Test System (ITS), one or more torpedo guidance parameters from a user, in response to a simulated target. The method further includes generating, based on the received torpedo guidance parameters, by the ITS, a simulated target signal and a simulated speed signal for the torpedo. The method further includes transmitting, by the ITS, the generated simulated target signal, and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo, wherein the torpedo processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target. The method further includes receiving, by the ITS, a response from the torpedo in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal. The method further includes determining, by the ITS, whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target. The method further includes receiving, by the ITS, at least one of one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid. The method further includes generating, by the ITS, one or more signals to control the torpedo based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands.
[0009] In one or more embodiments, the method includes recommending one or more tests to the user in order to test the torpedo prior to the torpedo launch by utilizing one or more test modules and the ITS, wherein the one or more test modules comprise a warhead module, an exercise module, an Independent Check (INDPCHK) module, an ITS Check Out (ITSCHKOU) module, and a troubleshooting module. The method further includes generating a report associated with the one or more recommended tests.
[0010] In one or more embodiments, the method includes receiving, by the ITS, an Alternating Current (AC) input from an AC power source through an emergency on-off switch, wherein the emergency on-off switch is connected in a series with the AC power source and the ITS, and the emergency on-off switch aids in preventing power supply leakage for the ITS.
[0011] In one or more embodiments, the one or more torpedo guidance parameters comprise at least one of depth information of the target, range information of the target, and torpedo speed information.
[0012] In one or more embodiments, the method includes receiving, by the ITS, the torpedo speed commands from the user in terms of Hertz (Hz) using a knob and a timer circuit.
[0013] In one or more embodiments, the method includes generating, by the ITS, the one or more steering control commands based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo.
[0014] In one or more embodiments, the method includes displaying, by the ITS, at least one indicator associated with the one or more steering control commands by utilizing at least one of one or more Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) and one or more Digital Panel Meters (DPMs).
[0015] In one or more embodiments, the one or more signals comprise a 28V initialization pulse signal (INS), a Preset Acknowledge (PRS ACK) signal, a Data Acquisition and Recording System (DARS) OK signal, a Ceiling Cut-Off (CCO) signal, an Attack Cutoff (ATC OFF) signal, and a Depth Cut-Off (DCO) signal, and the one or more signals are generated by utilizing one or more toggle switches associated with the ITS.
[0016] In one or more embodiments, the method includes performing a torpedo launch simulation by the 28V INS signal, the PRS ACK signal, and the DARS OK signal. The method further includes performing a torpedo run simulation by the CCO signal. The method further includes performing a torpedo termination simulation by the ATC OFF signal, the DCO signal, and the CCO signal.
[0017] In one or more embodiments, the method includes wherein the 28V INS is sent to the torpedo, from the ITS for initiating exercise head electronics, the PRS ACK signal is sent to the torpedo from the ITS for simulating the acknowledging to an electronic device (e.g., launch computer), wherein the DARS OK signal indicates a health of DARS sub-system of the torpedo, wherein the CCO signal signifies a pulse indicating that the torpedo has reached water, wherein the ATC OFF signal signifies that the torpedo is quite near to the identified target, and wherein the DCO signal signifies that the torpedo has reached its maximum permissible depth in one or more test scenarios.
[0018] In one or more embodiments, the method includes determining, by the ITS, whether the torpedo is propelling very nearer to a surface. The method further includes triggering, by the ITS, an alarm pertaining to minimum running depth is simulated by utilizing the CCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo is running very nearer to the surface.
[0019] In one or more embodiments, the method includes determining, by the ITS, whether the torpedo is propelling to a higher depth. The method further includes triggering, by the ITS, an alarm pertaining to exceeding permissible depth is simulated by utilizing the DCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo is propelling to a higher depth.
[0020] In one or more embodiments, the method includes determining, by the ITS, whether the torpedo is propelling too close to the target. The method further includes triggering, by the ITS, an alarm pertaining to a close range is simulated by utilizing the ATC OFF signal in response to determine that the torpedo is propelling too close to the target.
[0021] In one or more embodiments, the method includes recommending, by the ITS, one or more instructions to the user to perform various sequences of operations corresponding to each test module. The method further includes storing, by the ITS, a result in a temporary database of the ITS when the various sequences of operations completed corresponding to each test module.
[0022] In one or more embodiments, the method includes providing a stable 170 V direct current (DC) power supply to the ITS for testing the torpedo.
[0023] In one or more embodiments, the method includes controlling variation of an earth–neutral voltage associated with the ITS within a predefined range, wherein the predefined range is 3Volts.
[0024] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for controlling the torpedo is disclosed. The system includes an AC power source, an emergency on-off switch, an electronic device, and the torpedo. The ITS is configured to receive one or more torpedo guidance parameters from a user, in response to the simulated target. The ITS is further configured to generate, based on the received torpedo guidance parameters, the simulated target signal, and the simulated speed signal for the torpedo. The ITS is further configured to transmit the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo, wherein the torpedo processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target. The ITS is further configured to receive the response from the torpedo in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal. The ITS is further configured to determine whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target. The ITS is further configured to receive the at least one of one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid. The ITS is further configured to generate the one or more signals to control the torpedo based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands.
[0025] To further clarify the advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof, which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail in the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0026] These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
[0027] FIG. 1A illustrates a block diagram of a system for controlling a torpedo, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0028] FIG. 1B illustrates a block diagram of an Integrated Test System (ITS) for controlling the torpedo, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0029] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic diagram of an emergency on-off switch, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0030] FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of a torpedo steering control monitor, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0031] FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic diagram of a torpedo speed simulator, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0032] FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic diagram of a torpedo launch, run, and termination (LRT) simulator(s), according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0033] FIG. 6 illustrates one or more tests recommended to a user in order to test the torpedo prior to torpedo launch by utilizing one or more test modules, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein;
[0034] FIG. 7 illustrates a display mechanism associated with the integrated test system to guide the user while performing a torpedo test, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein; and
[0035] FIG. 8 illustrates a flow diagram of a method for controlling the torpedo, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein.
[0036] Further, skilled artisans will appreciate those elements in the drawings are illustrated for simplicity and may not have necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the flow charts illustrate the method in terms of the most prominent steps involved to help to improve understanding of aspects of the present invention. Furthermore, in terms of the construction of the device, one or more components of the device may have been represented in the drawings by conventional symbols, and the drawings may show only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the drawings with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

[0037] For the purpose of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated system, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
[0038] It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory of the invention and are not intended to be restrictive thereof.
[0039] Reference throughout this specification to “an aspect”, “another aspect” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrase “in an embodiment”, “in one embodiment”, “in another embodiment”, and similar language throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the same embodiment.
[0040] The terms “comprise”, “comprising”, or any other variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process or method that comprises a list of steps does not include only those steps but may include other steps not expressly listed or inherent to such process or method. Similarly, one or more devices or sub-systems or elements or structures or components proceeded by “comprises... a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of other devices or other sub-systems or other elements or other structures or other components or additional devices or additional sub-systems or additional elements or additional structures or additional components.
[0041] The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the embodiments herein. Also, the various embodiments described herein are not necessarily mutually exclusive, as some embodiments can be combined with one or more other embodiments to form new embodiments. The term “or” as used herein, refers to a non-exclusive or unless otherwise indicated. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the embodiments herein can be practiced and to further enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly, the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments herein.
[0042] As is traditional in the field, embodiments may be described and illustrated in terms of blocks that carry out a described function or functions. These blocks, which may be referred to herein as units or modules or the like, are physically implemented by analog or digital circuits such as logic gates, integrated circuits, microprocessors, microcontrollers, memory circuits, passive electronic components, active electronic components, optical components, hardwired circuits, or the like, and may optionally be driven by firmware and software. The circuits may, for example, be embodied in one or more semiconductor chips, or on substrate supports such as printed circuit boards and the like. The circuits constituting a block may be implemented by dedicated hardware, or by a processor (e.g., one or more programmed microprocessors and associated circuitry), or by a combination of dedicated hardware to perform some functions of the block and a processor to perform other functions of the block. Each block of the embodiments may be physically separated into two or more interacting and discrete blocks without departing from the scope of the invention. Likewise, the blocks of the embodiments may be physically combined into more complex blocks without departing from the scope of the invention.
[0043] The accompanying drawings are used to help easily understand various technical features and it should be understood that the embodiments presented herein are not limited by the accompanying drawings. As such, the present disclosure should be construed to extend to any alterations, equivalents, and substitutes in addition to those which are particularly set out in the accompanying drawings. Although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are generally only used to distinguish one element from another.
[0044] FIG. 1A illustrates a block diagram of a system 1000 for controlling a torpedo 200, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The system 1000 includes an emergency on-off switch 102 which is connected in series with an Alternating Current (AC) power source 101 and serves as an AC input to an integrated test system 150 of an electronic device 100, and the torpedo 200. The emergency on-off switch 102 aids in preventing power supply leakage of at least one of the torpedo 200 and the integrated test system 150, as described in conjunction with FIG.2.
[0045] In one or more embodiments, the electronic device 100 includes a memory 110, a processor 120, a communicator 130, a display module 140, and the integrated test system 150.
[0046] In an embodiment, the memory 110 stores instructions to be executed by the processor 120 for controlling the torpedo 200, as discussed throughout the disclosure. The memory 110 may include non-volatile storage elements. Examples of such non-volatile storage elements may include magnetic hard discs, optical discs, floppy discs, flash memories, or forms of electrically programmable memories (EPROM) or electrically erasable and programmable (EEPROM) memories. In addition, the memory 110 may, in some examples, be considered a non-transitory storage medium. The term “non-transitory” may indicate that the storage medium is not embodied in a carrier wave or a propagated signal. However, the term “non-transitory” should not be interpreted that the memory 110 is non-movable. In some examples, the memory 110 can be configured to store larger amounts of information than the memory. In certain examples, a non-transitory storage medium may store data that can, over time, change (e.g., in Random Access Memory (RAM) or cache). The memory 110 can be an internal storage unit, or it can be an external storage unit of the electronic device 100, a cloud storage, or any other type of external storage.
[0047] The processor 120 communicates with the memory 110, the communicator 130, the display module 140, and the integrated test system 150. The processor 120 is configured to execute instructions stored in the memory 110 and to perform various processes for controlling the torpedo 200, as discussed throughout the disclosure. The processor 120 may include one or a plurality of processors, maybe a general-purpose processor, such as a Central Processing Unit (CPU), an Application Processor (AP), or the like, a graphics-only processing unit such as a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), a Visual Processing Unit (VPU), and/or an Artificial Intelligence (AI) dedicated processor such as a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
[0048] The communicator 130 is configured for communicating internally between internal hardware components and with external devices (e.g., server) via one or more networks (e.g., radio technology). The communicator 130 includes an electronic circuit specific to a standard that enables wired or wireless communication. The display module 140 can accept user inputs and is made of a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), a Light Emitting Diode (LED), an Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED), one or more Digital Panel Meters (DPMs), or another type of display. The user inputs may include but are not limited to, touch, swipe, drag, gesture, utilizing knob mechanism, an onboard computing mechanism, and so on.
[0049] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to receive one or more torpedo guidance parameters from a user, in response to a simulated target. The one or more torpedo guidance parameters comprise at least one of depth information of the target, range information of the target, and torpedo speed information, as illustrated in FIG. 7. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to generate, based on the received torpedo guidance parameters a simulated target signal and a simulated speed signal for the torpedo. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to transmit the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo 200, wherein the torpedo 200 processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to receive a response from the torpedo 200 in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to determine whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to receive one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1B, FIG. 3, and FIG. 4. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to generate one or more signals to control the torpedo 200 based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1B and FIG. 5.
[0050] Consider a military training scenario in which a naval depot crew uses the integrated test system 150 to test the torpedo 200. The naval depot crew inputs the one or more torpedo guidance (desired depth, range, and speed parameters) for the simulated target they want to engage. The integrated test system 150 then generates the simulated target signal that mimics the behavior of the target and the simulated speed signal for the torpedo 200 being tested. The generated simulated target signal and simulated speed signal are then transmitted to the torpedo 200. The torpedo 200 processes these signals to propel itself towards the simulated target. Once the torpedo 200 reaches the target, the torpedo 200 sends the response back to the integrated test system 150. The integrated test system 150 then evaluates whether the received response from the torpedo 200 is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and speed signal. If the response is deemed valid, it means that the torpedo 200 successfully engaged the target. However, if the response is not valid, indicating a missed target or other issues, the system 1000 allows the user to provide steering control commands and speed commands for the torpedo 200 by utilizing the. These commands are received by the integrated test system 150, which generates the one or more signals to adjust and control the torpedo’s steering and speed based on the user’s input. This iterative process allows the naval depot crew to refine the performance of the torpedo 200 by analyzing the responses, making adjustments, and retesting until they achieve the desired results.
[0051] In one or more embodiments, the one or more signals may include but are not limited to, a 28V initialization pulse signal (INS), a Preset Acknowledge (PRS ACK) signal, a Data Acquisition and Recording System (DARS) OK signal, a Ceiling Cut-Off (CCO) signal, an Attack Cutoff (ATC OFF) signal, and a Depth Cut-Off (DCO) signal, and the one or more signals are generated by utilizing one or more toggle switches associated with the integrated test system 150.
[0052] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to perform a torpedo launch simulation by the 28V INS signal, the PRS ACK signal, and the DARS OK signal, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1B and FIG. 5.
[0053] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to perform a torpedo run simulation by the CCO signal, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1B and FIG. 5.
[0054] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to perform a torpedo termination simulation by the ATC OFF signal, the DCO signal, and the CCO signal, as described in conjunction with FIG. 1B and FIG. 5.
[0055] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to receive the torpedo speed commands from the user in terms of hertz (Hz) using a knob and a timer circuit.
[0056] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to generate the one or more steering control commands based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo 200.
[0057] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to recommend one or more tests to the user in order to test the torpedo prior to the torpedo launch by utilizing one or more test modules and the electronic device 100, as described in conjunction with FIG. 6. The one or more test modules may include, but are not limited to, a warhead module, an exercise module, an Independent Check (INDPCHK) module, an ITS Check Out (ITSCHKOU) module, and a troubleshooting module. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to generate a report associated with the one or more recommended tests, wherein the generated report is displayed on the display module 140 of the electronic device 100.
[0058] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 is configured to recommend one or more instructions to the user to perform various sequences of operations corresponding to each test module. The integrated test system 150 is further configured to store a result in a temporary database of the integrated test system 150 (e.g., memory 110) when the various sequences of operations are completed corresponding to each test module.
[0059] Although FIG. 1A shows various hardware components of the system 1000, but it is to be understood that other embodiments are not limited thereon. In other embodiments, the system 1000 may include less or more number of components. Further, the labels or names of the components are used only for illustrative purposes and do not limit the scope of the invention. One or more components can be combined to perform the same or substantially similar functions to control the torpedo 200.
[0060] FIG. 1B illustrates a block diagram of integrated test system 150 for controlling the torpedo 200, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The integrated test system 150 is implemented by processing circuitry such as logic gates, integrated circuits, microprocessors, microcontrollers, memory circuits, passive electronic components, active electronic components, optical components, hardwired circuits, or the like, and may optionally be driven by firmware. The circuits may, for example, be embodied in one or more semiconductor chips, or on substrate supports such as printed circuit boards and the like.
[0061] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 may include a torpedo steering control monitor 151, a torpedo speed simulator 152, a torpedo launch simulator 153, a torpedo run simulator 154, a torpedo termination simulator 155, a recommending module 156, and a report generation module 157.
[0062] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo steering control monitor 151 is configured to receive the one or more torpedo steering control commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid, as described in conjunction with FIG. 3. The one or more steering control commands is generated based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo 200. The torpedo steering control monitor 151 is further configured to display at least one indicator associated with the one or more steering control commands by utilizing at least one of one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and one or more digital panel meters (DPMs), as illustrated in FIG. 3.
[0063] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo speed simulator 152 is configured to receive the one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid, as described in conjunction with FIG. 4. The one or more torpedo speed commands received from the user in terms of hertz (Hz) using the knob and the timer circuit, as illustrated in FIG. 4.
[0064] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo launch simulator 153, the torpedo run simulator 154, and the torpedo termination simulator 155 are configured to generate the one or more signals to control the torpedo 200 based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands, as described in conjunction with FIG. 5.
[0065] In one or more embodiments, the recommending module 156 is configured to recommend the one or more tests to the user in order to test the torpedo 200 prior to the torpedo launch by utilizing one or more test modules and the electronic device 100, as described in conjunction with FIG. 6. The recommending module 156 is configured to recommend one or more instructions to the user to perform various sequences of operations corresponding to each test module.
[0066] In one or more embodiments, the report generation module 157 is configured to generate a report associated with the one or more recommended tests, wherein the generated report is displayed on the display module 140 of the electronic device 100. The report generation module 157 is further configured to store the result in a temporary database of the ITS when the various sequences of operations are completed corresponding to each test module.
[0067] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic diagram 200 of the emergency on-off switch 102, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein.
[0068] The torpedo 200 is required to be tested with a 170 V DC stable power supply, it is crucial to exercise extreme caution during the testing process. Any leakage of the power supply can have detrimental effects on both the torpedo 200 and the integrated test system 150. To prevent such incidents, the emergency on-off switch 102 (E-STOP) has been incorporated into the system 1000. The emergency on-off switch 102 serves as a safety measure by continuously monitoring the AC input from the AC power source 101. If any fluctuations or irregularities are detected in the AC power source 101, the emergency on-off switch 102 automatically triggers an off-state condition. In simpler terms, the emergency on-off switch 102 cuts off the power supply to the integrated test system 150.
[0069] For example, consider a scenario where a team of engineers is conducting a test on the torpedo 200 using the integrated test system 150. The torpedo 200 requires the stable 170 V DC power supply for the test. To ensure safety, the emergency on-off switch 102 is installed between the AC power source 101 and the integrated test system 150/electronic device 100. During the test, if there is any fluctuation or instability in the AC power source 101, such as a power surge or voltage drop, the emergency on-off switch 102 immediately detects it. As a safety measure, the emergency on-off switch 102 automatically switches off, cutting off the power supply to the integrated test system 150. This prevents any potential damage to both the torpedo 200 and the integrated test system 150.
[0070] Additionally, the torpedo 200 is required to be tested with the interfaces which have AC supply to them. Any significant variations from earth-neutral voltages (e.g., >3Volts) may affect the system 1000. The spikes in the Earth-Neutral voltage during the test often affect the torpedo. To prevent such incidents, the emergency on-off switch 102 has been incorporated into the system 1000. The emergency on-off switch 102 serves as a safety measure by continuously monitoring the earth-neutral voltages. If any fluctuations or irregularities are detected in the earth-neutral voltages, the emergency on-off switch 102 automatically triggers the off-state condition.
[0071] FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram 300 of the torpedo steering control monitor 151, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The schematic diagram 300 includes one or more DPMs, one or more LEDs, and a DC-DC Converter. In this system 1000, the torpedo steering control monitor 151 circuitry is housed inside the integrated test system 150 (ITS rack) rather than keeping it outside the ITS rack.
[0072] The torpedo steering control monitor 151 is configured to receive the one or more torpedo steering control commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid. The one or more steering control commands is generated based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo 200. The torpedo steering control monitor 151 is further configured to display at least one indicator (e.g., LEDs, DPMs, etc.) associated with the one or more received steering control commands (e.g., PORT/COURSE/STBD). The LEDs indicates the direction of movement of respective steering control. The PORT and STBD steering controls have the capability to move either in upward (UP) or downward (DOWN) direction, while the COURSE steering control has capability to move either in Port (PORT) or Starboard (STBD) direction. The DPM quantify the movement of PORT, STBD and COURSE steering controls. The steering control monitor 103a is used to qualitatively find out a direction of movement of the torpedo 200. The PORT indicates a direction of the port side movement controller. The STBD indicates a direction of a starboard side movement controller. The COURSE indicates a direction of a yaw movement controller.
[0073] FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic diagram 400 of the torpedo speed simulator 152, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein.
[0074] The torpedo speed simulator 152 is configured to receive torpedo speed commands from the user when the received response is determined to be invalid. The torpedo speed simulator 152 consists of components such as a timer circuit (e.g., 555 timer IC) 401, one or more buffers 402, a DPM 403 for frequency measurement, and a potentiometer (knob) 404 for controlling the frequency/torpedo speed commands. The timer circuit 401 generates a continuous waveform that serves as the basis for simulating torpedo speed. The output of the timer circuit 401 passes through the one or more buffers 402, which help distribute the signal to the torpedo 200, display it on the integrated test system 150, and transmit it to the data acquisition system. In other words, the generated continuous waveform is then distributed through the one or more buffers 402 to various components. It is sent to the torpedo 200 to simulate the desired speed, displayed on the integrated test system 150 (ITS rack) for monitoring purposes, and transmitted to the data acquisition system for further analysis. The use of the one or more buffers 402 minimizes any loss of signal during distribution. The DPM 403 on the integrated test system 150 is responsible for reading and displaying the generated frequency, allowing users to monitor and adjust the simulated torpedo speed accurately. The potentiometer 404, acting as a variable resistor, is used to control the resistance, which in turn modifies the frequency generated by the timer circuit 401.
[0075] For example, consider a scenario where a naval engineer conducting tests on a torpedo 200 using the integrated test system 150. During testing, if the received response from the torpedo 200 indicates an unsuccessful engagement, the naval engineer can input torpedo speed commands using the torpedo speed simulator 152. By adjusting the potentiometer 404 and observing the DPM 403 reading, the naval engineer can fine-tune and simulate different torpedo speeds accurately. This allows naval engineer to evaluate the performance of the torpedo 200 under various speed conditions without physically launching torpedoes.
[0076] FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic diagram 500 of the torpedo LRT simulator(s) (501 to 506), according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 (i.e., a combination of torpedo launch simulator 153, torpedo run simulator 154, and torpedo termination simulator 155) comprises one or more sub-schematic diagrams to test the torpedo’s one or more functionalities, which are described below. The schematic diagram 500 includes a Double Pole Double Throw (DPDT) switches, one or more LEDs, and one or more resistors for the LEDs. The DPDT switches are used for controlling the flow of the signal once activated. The one or more LEDs and corresponding resistors are used for activating respective LEDs.
a) The torpedo launch simulation is performed by the 28V INS signal 503, the PRS ACK signal 502, and the DARS OK signal 504.
b) The torpedo run simulation is performed mainly by the CCO signal 506.
c) The torpedo termination can be simulated by the ATC OFF signal 501, the DCO signal 505, and the CCO signal 506.
[0077] The signals (501 to 506) are TTL level and 28V level signals. The simulation of the signals is done by the operation of the one or more toggle switches. The TTL level and 28V level are generated by the use of a DC-regulated power supply in the rack.
[0078] Here, the 28V INS signal 503 is sent to the torpedo 200, from the ITS for initiating exercise head electronics. The PRS ACK signal 502 is sent to the torpedo 200 from the ITS for simulating the acknowledgment to launch computer (e.g., the electronic device 100). The DARS OK signal 504 indicates a health of the DARS sub-system of the torpedo 200. The CCO signal 506 signifies a pulse indicating that the torpedo 200 has reached the water. The ATC OFF signal 501 signifies that the torpedo is quite near to the identified target. The DCO signal 505 signifies that the torpedo 200 has reached its maximum permissible depth in one or more test scenarios.
[0079] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is configured to determine whether the torpedo 200 is propelling very nearer to a surface. The torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is further configured to trigger an alarm pertaining to minimum running depth and is simulated by utilizing the CCO signal 506 in response to determine that the torpedo 200 is running very near to the surface.
[0080] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is configured to determine whether the torpedo 200 is propelling to a higher depth. The torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is further configured to trigger an alarm pertaining to exceeding permissible depth and is simulated by utilizing the DCO signal 505 in response to determine that the torpedo 200 is propelling to a higher depth.
[0081] In one or more embodiments, the torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is configured to determine whether the torpedo 200 is propelling too close to the target. The torpedo LRT simulator(s) 500 is further configured to trigger an alarm pertaining to a close range is simulated by utilizing the ATC OFF signal 501 in response to determine that the torpedo 200 is propelling too close to the target.
[0082] FIG. 6 illustrates one or more tests recommended to the user in order to test the torpedo prior to torpedo launch by utilizing one or more test modules 600, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The one or more test modules 600 comprise the warhead module 601, the exercise module 602, the INDPCHK module 603, the ITSCHKOU module 604, and the troubleshoot module 605, wherein F1 to F5 indicates function keys of computing mechanism to activate a particular functionality. Various functionality, run by a processor of the ITS, associated with the one or more test modules 600 is described below in Table-1.
Module(s) Functionality
Warhead module 601 • The module is used for testing the torpedo 200 in a warhead configuration.
• The steps pertaining to the warhead configuration will be executed.
• The module will give instructions on performing various sequences of operations to be performed in each test in the warhead configuration.
• After the completion of each test, the test records are stored in a temporary database, till all the tests are completed.
• Once all the tests are completed, the module may generate a test report with all the results recorded.
Exercise module 602 • The module is used for testing torpedo 200 in a practice/ exercise head configuration.
• The steps pertaining to an exercise head torpedo may be executed.
• The module will give instructions on performing various sequences of operations to be performed in each test associated with the torpedo 200.
• After the completion of each test, the test records are stored in a temporary database, till all the tests are completed.
• Once all the tests are completed, the module may generate a test report with all the results recorded.
INDPCHK module 603 • The module is used for testing only the exercise head torpedo.
• The steps pertaining to exercise head may be executed.
• Various parameters pertaining only to exercise head will be monitored and displayed.
ITSCHKOU module 604 • The module is used for testing the correctness of the test rack.
• The rack is connected to an external simulator.
• Different signals are simulated, and their response is monitored on the screen.
Troubleshoot module 605 • The module is used when there is a requirement to perform specific tests as part of the troubleshooting sequence.
• The module is an advanced-level module, used for finding faults in a particular sub-system.
• The module will help in performing individual checks multiple times to check repeatability and reliability in case of failure.
Table-1
[0083] FIG. 7 illustrates a display mechanism 700 associated with the integrated test system 150 to guide the user while performing the torpedo test, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. When the user selects a type of torpedo 200 and the test to be performed in the display mechanism 700. Following selection, the integrated test system 150 may notify the user of the tests to be performed and the connection diagram. Later, the integrated test system 150 may prompt the user on the test sequence. Following the completion of the test, the integrated test system 150 may display the reading. As shown in FIG. 7, the integrated test system 150 prompts the user to set the pressure to 12 kg/cm2 and displays the current depth as 141 m.
[0084] FIG. 8 illustrates a flow diagram of a method 800 for controlling the torpedo 200, according to an embodiment as disclosed herein. The one or more steps of the method 800 are performed by at least one module/device of the system 1000.
[0085] At step 801, the method 800 includes receiving the one or more torpedo guidance parameters from the user, in response to the simulated target. At step 802, the method 800 includes generating, based on the received torpedo guidance parameters, the simulated target signal, and the simulated speed signal for the torpedo 200. At step 803, the method 800 includes transmitting the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo 200, wherein the torpedo processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target. At step 804, the method 800 includes receiving the response from the torpedo 200 in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal. At step 805, the method 800 includes determining whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target. At step 806, the method 800 includes receiving the at least one of one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid. At step 807, the method 800 includes generating the one or more signals to control the torpedo 200 based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands.
[0086] The various actions, acts, blocks, steps, or the like in the flow diagram may be performed in the order presented, in a different order, or simultaneously. Further, in some embodiments, some of the actions, acts, blocks, steps, or the like may be omitted, added, modified, skipped, or the like without departing from the scope of the invention.
[0087] In one or more embodiments, the integrated test system 150 tests the functionality of the torpedo 200 by providing requisite control, status, and simulation signals to the torpedo 200 and understanding the performance and functionality of the torpedo 200 even prior to launch and during its preparation, as described below.
a) The integrated test system 150 generates the simulated target signal to identify and analyze the target.
b) The integrated test system 150 generates the simulated speed so that the torpedo 200 propels towards the target and calculates the guidance parameters. The torpedo 200 is propelled using a motor. During the testing of the torpedo 200, its full-throttle propulsion was not tested for safety and maintenance reasons. However, the guidance logic of the torpedo 200 is dependent on the speed of the torpedo 200 for calculating the target’s probable location through the computation of its relative speed. Explosion arming is also linked to the speed of the torpedo 200 for catering to own ship safety time and distance propagation. To meet the above requirements, the torpedo speed simulator 152 is incorporated into the integrated test system 150 for feeding a simulated speed component into the torpedo run logic during the testing for simulating all the test cases. The knob with a display is available to the user to operate the torpedo speed in terms of Hz. It is controlled by an ON/OFF switch. The timer circuit is controlled with the knob and output is fed to the display and the torpedo 200 simultaneously. Whenever the user selects a particular speed, the simulated speed signal is generated and fed to the torpedo 200. The same speed simulator can be used for verifying the torpedo’s response in terms of generating an explosion command.
c) The integrated test system 150 reads the steering characteristics of the torpedo 200 for verifying the guidance patterns in different depths, same depths, and different bearings. The torpedo steering control monitor 151 commands are received and passed through resistors. These signals are then fed to LEDs and DPMs. The depth is given to the torpedo 200 externally. Based on the depth simulated, the response of the steering mechanism is monitored and verified.
d) The integrated test system 150 generates conditions to verify the guidance of the torpedo 200 with search phases, homing phase, tracking phase, target lost contact phases, and re-attack/attack phases. The entity that performs this operation is the circuitry in ITS Rack and the module/software. The circuitry is the same as the older design. Based on the controls available on the integrated test system 150 (ITS Rack-II), the rack simulates various signals that emulate the presence of the target. A signal generated by the integrated test system 150 (ITS Rack) is fed to the torpedo 200. The signal is processed by the torpedo 200. After processing, the homing response of the torpedo 200 is monitored by using the module/software.
e) The integrated test system 150 generates a power supply to all the electronic sub-systems.
f) The integrated test system 150 generates simulated alarming conditions for the torpedo 200 to initiate its recovery aids. Some of the alarm conditions simulated (trigger) include not maintaining minimum run depth (CCO 506), exceeding the permissible depth (DCO 505), and approaching the target beyond the safe limit (ATCOFF 510).
i. If the torpedo 200 is running very near to the surface, then the alarm pertaining to minimum running depth is simulated (CCO 506).
ii. If the torpedo 200 is going to higher depths during the run, then the alarm pertaining to exceeding permissible depth is simulated (DCO 505).
iii. If the torpedo 200 is approaching the target and is dangerously close to the target, then the alarm pertaining to the close range is simulated (ATCOFF 510).
g) The integrated test system 150 reads online recorded data to verify the correctness of the recorded data.
h) The integrated test system 150 feeds the preliminary details of the target viz., depth, range, etc., prior to launching for initial guidance of the torpedo 200 to simulate the launch and fire sequence.
i) The integrated test system 150 guides the user/technician to test the system to follow the test cases so that the torpedo 200 is tested, as disclosed in FIG. 7.
j) The integrated test system 150 records the results of the test cases for records. The results are stored in the memory (temporary database) until all the tests under a particular head are completed. After all the tests are completed, data from the database is compiled and the test report is generated.
[0088] In one or more embodiments, the disclosed system has several advantages over the existing system, which is described in Table-2 below.
S.N. Existing system Disclosed system
1 Emergency on-off switch is not available. The emergency on-off switch, which cuts off power to the torpedo and ITS is available. This helps in reducing the damage to the torpedo in case of malfunction.
2 Earth - Neutral Voltage is not monitored Earth – Neutral Voltage is monitored. This helps in the reduction of damage to the systems and the introduction of AC components on an otherwise DC-only system.
3 External test panels are required to be connected during the test. Reduced connectivity of external test panels thereby simplifying the overall test setup.
4 Testing requires a highly trained operator. An operator with a relatively lower skill can perform the test, as the test software will prompt the test sequences to be performed.
5 Human intervention is high for judging the results. Reduced human intervention for judging the results.
6 Software-based switches are included in the test sequence for activating particular signals. Software switches are converted to hardware to make the system more uniform to other test panels.
Table-2
[0089] In one or more embodiments, the disclosed system has several differences and advantages over the existing system, which is described in Table-3 below.
S. No. Entity Existing system Disclosed system Remarks
1. Torpedo speed simulator 152 Only two speeds (20Hz & 50Hz) can be simulated. The switching of speeds is through the toggle switch. Speed simulation is done uniformly across a wider range (80Hz-130Hz). This helps in reducing the use of external speed generation through a function generator.
2. Torpedo LRT simulator(s)
500 The simulation is done by use of software control. The simulation is done by use of hardware control through the one or more toggle switches. This change keeps the system uniform with the individual test panels.
3. Torpedo steering control monitor 151 The steering control monitor is kept outside the rack as a separate test panel. The steering control monitor is kept housed inside the rack. This change reduces the requirement of keeping an external separate test panel.
Table-3
[0090] The disclosed method 800 offers several advantages over the existing ITS used for torpedo testing. The existing ITS faces various problems and limitations, which are addressed by the disclosed method 800, which are mentioned below.
[0091] The existing ITS lacks a solution to detect or provide an alternate solution for an unstable DC power supply. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 incorporates safeguards to prevent harm to both the torpedo 200 (i.e., emergency on-off switch 102) and the ITS in case of power supply leaks or fluctuations during testing, as described in conjunction with FIG. 2.
[0092] The existing ITS does not have a solution to detect significant variations from the earth-neutral voltage, which can affect the ITS. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 includes measures to monitor and detect any spikes or deviations in the earth-neutral voltage, ensuring the torpedo’s performance is not compromised, as described in conjunction with FIG. 2.
[0093] The existing ITS relies on manual observation and interpretation of displayed data, which can lead to unfair manipulation and security concerns. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 automates data recording, eliminating human intervention and providing a more reliable and secure analysis of the torpedo’s performance.
[0094] The existing ITS requires additional test equipment with minimal control to complement the testing process. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 minimizes the need for additional equipment, streamlining the testing process and enhancing efficiency.
[0095] The existing software used in the existing ITS is not compatible with the latest Windows platforms, limiting users' ability to effectively test the torpedo. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 ensures compatibility with the latest, for example, Windows platforms, enabling users to utilize the ITS on their devices without any limitations.
[0096] Testing the torpedo using the existing ITS requires highly skilled and competent users with detailed knowledge of its operation. In contrast, the disclosed method 800 simplifies the testing process, reducing the requirement for specialized expertise and making it more accessible for users of varying proficiency levels.
[0097] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one ordinary skilled in the art to which this invention belongs. The system, methods, and examples provided herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
[0098] While specific language has been used to describe the present subject matter, any limitations arising on account thereto, are not intended. As would be apparent to a person in the art, various working modifications may be made to the method to implement the inventive concept as taught herein. The drawings and the forgoing description give examples of embodiments. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that one or more of the described elements may well be combined into a single functional element. Alternatively, certain elements may be split into multiple functional elements. Elements from one embodiment may be added to another embodiment.
[0099] The embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented using at least one hardware device and performing network management functions to control the elements.
[0100] The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the scope of the embodiments as described herein. ,CLAIMS:1. A method (800) for controlling a torpedo (200), the method (800) comprising:
receiving (801), by an integrated test system (ITS) (150), one or more torpedo guidance parameters from a user, in response to a simulated target;
generating (802), based on the received torpedo guidance parameters, by the ITS (150), a simulated target signal and a simulated speed signal for the torpedo (200);
transmitting (803), by the ITS (150), the generated simulated target signal, and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo (200), wherein the torpedo (200) processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target;
receiving (804), by the ITS (150), a response from the torpedo (200) in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal;
determining (805), by the ITS (150), whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target;
receiving (806), by the ITS (150), at least one of one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid; and
generating (807), by the ITS (150), one or more signals to control the torpedo (200) based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands.

2. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
recommending, by the ITS (150), one or more tests to the user in order to test the torpedo (200) prior to the torpedo (200) launch by utilizing one or more test modules and an electronic device 100, wherein the one or more test modules comprise a warhead module, an exercise module, an independent check (INDPCHK) module, an ITS check out (ITSCHKOU) module, and a troubleshooting module; and
generating, by the ITS (150), a report associated with the one or more recommended tests, wherein the generated report is displayed on a display module 140 of the electronic device 100.

3. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
receiving, by the ITS (150), an alternating current (AC) input from an AC power source (101) through an emergency on-off switch (102), wherein the emergency on-off switch (102) is connected in a series with the AC power source (101) and the ITS (150), and the emergency on-off switch (102) aids in preventing power supply leakage for the ITS (150).

4. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the one or more torpedo guidance parameters comprise at least one of depth information of the target, range information of the target, and torpedo speed information.

5. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
receiving, by the ITS (150), the torpedo (200) speed commands from the user in terms of hertz (Hz) using a knob and a timer circuit.

6. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
generating, by the ITS (150), the one or more steering control commands based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo (200).

7. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
displaying, by the ITS (150), at least one indicator associated with the one or more steering control commands by utilizing at least one of one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and one or more digital panel meters (DPMs).

8. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the one or more signals comprise a 28V initialization pulse signal (INS), a Preset Acknowledge (PRS ACK) signal, a DARS OK signal, a Ceiling Cut-Off (CCO) signal, an Attack Cutoff (ATC OFF) signal, and a Depth Cut-Off (DCO) signal, and the one or more signals are generated by utilizing one or more toggle switches associated with the ITS (150).

9. The method (800) as claimed in claim 8, comprising:
performing a torpedo launch simulation by the 28V INS signal, the PRS ACK signal, and the DARS OK signal;
performing a torpedo run simulation by the CCO signal; and
performing a torpedo termination simulation by the ATC OFF signal, the DCO signal, and the CCO signal.

10. The method (800) as claimed in claim 8,
wherein the 28V INS signal is sent to the torpedo (200), from the ITS (150) for initiating exercise head electronics;
wherein the PRS ACK signal is sent to the torpedo (200) from the ITS (150) for simulating the acknowledging to an electronic device (100);
wherein the DARS OK signal indicates a health of DARS sub-system of the torpedo (200);
wherein the CCO signal signifies a pulse indicating that the torpedo (200) has reached water;
wherein the ATC OFF signal signifies that the torpedo (200) is quite near to the identified target; and
wherein the DCO signal signifies that the torpedo (200) has reached its maximum permissible depth in one or more test scenarios.

11. The method (800) as claimed in claim 8, comprising:
determining, by the ITS (150), whether the torpedo (200) is propelling very nearer to a surface; and
triggering, by the ITS (150), an alarm pertaining to minimum running depth is simulated by utilizing the CCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is running very near to the surface.

12. The method (800) as claimed in claim 8, comprising:
determining, by the ITS (150), whether the torpedo (200) is propelling to a higher depth; and
triggering, by the ITS (150), an alarm pertaining to exceeding permissible depth is simulated by utilizing the DCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is propelling to the higher depth.

13. The method (800) as claimed in claim 8, comprising:
determining, by the ITS (150), whether the torpedo (200) is propelling too close to the target; and
triggering, by the ITS (150), an alarm pertaining to a close range is simulated by utilizing the ATC OFF signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is propelling too close to the target.

14. The method (800) as claimed in claim 2, comprising:
recommending, by the ITS (150), one or more instructions to the user to perform various sequences of operations corresponding to each test module; and
storing, by the ITS (150), a result in a temporary database of the ITS (150) when the various sequences of operations are completed corresponding to each test module.

15. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
providing a stable 170 V direct current (DC) power supply to the ITS (150) for testing the torpedo (200).

16. The method (800) as claimed in claim 1, comprising:
controlling variation of an earth–neutral voltage associated with the ITS (150) within a predefined range, wherein the predefined range is 3Volts.

17. A system (1000) for controlling a torpedo (200), the system (1000) comprising:
an Alternating Current (AC) (101);
an emergency on-off switch (102);
a torpedo (104); and
an electronic device (100), operably connected to the AC power source (101), the emergency on-off switch (102), and the torpedo (104), the electronic device (100) is configured to:
receive one or more torpedo guidance parameters from a user, in response to a simulated target;
generate a simulated target signal and a simulated speed signal for the torpedo (200);
transmit the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal to the torpedo (200), wherein the torpedo (200) processes the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the target;
receive a response from the torpedo (200) in response to the transmitted generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal;
determine whether the received response is valid based on the generated simulated target signal and the generated simulated speed signal in order to propel toward the identified target;
receive at least one of one or more torpedo steering control commands and one or more torpedo speed commands from the user in response to determining that the received response is not valid; and
generate one or more signals to control the torpedo (200) based on at least one of the one or more received torpedo steering control commands and the one or more received torpedo speed commands.

18. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
recommend one or more tests to the user in order to test the torpedo (200) prior to the torpedo (200) launch by utilizing one or more test modules and an electronic device 100, wherein the one or more test modules comprise a warhead module, an exercise module, an independent check (INDPCHK) module, an ITS check out (ITSCHKOU) module, and a troubleshooting module; and
generate a report associated with the one or more recommended tests, wherein the generated report is displayed on a display module 140 of the electronic device 100.

19. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
receive an alternating current (AC) input from an AC power source (101) through an emergency on-off switch (102), wherein the emergency on-off switch (102) is connected in a series with the AC power source (101) and the ITS (150), and the emergency on-off switch (102) aids in preventing power supply leakage for the ITS (150).

20. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the one or more torpedo guidance parameters comprise at least one of depth information of the target, range information of the target, and torpedo speed information.

21. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
receive the torpedo (200) speed commands from the user in terms of hertz (Hz) using a knob and a timer circuit.

22. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
generate the one or more steering control commands based on an onboard computing mechanism associated with the torpedo (200).

23. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
display at least one indicator associated with the one or more steering control commands by utilizing at least one of one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and one or more digital panel meters (DPMs).

24. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 17, wherein the one or more signals comprise a 28V initialization pulse signal (INS), a Preset Acknowledge (PRS ACK) signal, a DARS OK signal, a Ceiling Cut-Off (CCO) signal, an Attack Cutoff (ATC OFF) signal, and a Depth Cut-Off (DCO) signal, and the one or more signals are generated by utilizing one or more toggle switches associated with the ITS (150).

25. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 24, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
perform a torpedo launch simulation by the 28V INS signal, the PRS ACK signal, and the DARS OK signal;
perform a torpedo run simulation by the CCO signal; and
perform a torpedo termination simulation by the ATC OFF signal, the DCO signal, and the CCO signal.

26. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 24,
wherein the 28V INS signal is sent to the torpedo (200), from the ITS (150) for initiating exercise head electronics;
wherein the PRS ACK signal is sent to the torpedo (200) from the ITS (150) for simulating the acknowledging to an electronic device (100);
wherein the DARS OK signal indicates a health of DARS sub-system of the torpedo (200);
wherein the CCO signal signifies a pulse indicating that the torpedo (200) has reached water;
wherein the ATC OFF signal signifies that the torpedo (200) is quite near to the identified target; and
wherein the DCO signal signifies that the torpedo (200) has reached its maximum permissible depth in one or more test scenarios.

27. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 24, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
determine whether the torpedo (200) is propelling very nearer to a surface; and
trigger an alarm pertaining to minimum running depth is simulated by utilizing the CCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is running very near to the surface.

28. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 24, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
determine whether the torpedo (200) is propelling to a higher depth; and
trigger an alarm pertaining to exceeding permissible depth is simulated by utilizing the DCO signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is propelling to the higher depth.

29. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 24, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
determine whether the torpedo (200) is propelling too close to the target; and
trigger an alarm pertaining to a close range is simulated by utilizing the ATC OFF signal in response to determine that the torpedo (200) is propelling too close to the target.

30. The system (1000) as claimed in claim 18, wherein the electronic device (100) is configured to:
recommend one or more instructions to the user to perform various sequences of operations corresponding to each test module; and
store a result in a temporary database of the ITS (150) when the various sequences of operations are completed corresponding to each test module.