Abstract: A method and system for improving quality of service (QoS) in a wireless network are disclosed. In one embodiment bearer connection context parameters of each of a plurality of data packets in the wireless network are obtained. Further general packet radio service tunneling protocol user plane protocol data unit (G-PDU) packets are determined in the plurality of data packets based on first bearer connection context parameters which is a subset of the bearer connection context parameters. Furthermore the determined G-PDU packets are queued in a non-signaling queue. QoS attributes are then computed for each of the queued G-PDU packets. In addition priority data is computed for each of the queued G-PDU packets is computed using the computed QoS attributes. Moreover one or more priority queues are formed based on the computed priority data of each of the queued G-PDU packets for improving QoS in the wireless network.
TECHNICAL FIELD
Embodiments of the present subject matter relate to a wireless network. More particularly the embodiments of the present subject matter relate to improving quality of service (QoS) in the wireless network.
BACKGROUND
Long term evolution (LTE) network is a standard mobile broadband technology that provides a high speed Internet experience to subscribers (e.g. mobile subscribers). Currently a rapid increase in number of subscribers and recent emergence of new applications such as multimedia online gaming (MMOG) mobile television (TV) Web 2.0 and the like have resulted in a large scale increase in data (e.g. mobile data) and bandwidth usage. Due to the rapid increase in the number of subscribers the data and the bandwidth usage processing load in the LTE network is increasing which may lead to more traffic congestion data packet delay and/or data packet loss. Hence the subscribers’ experience is impacted. Also network operators (e.g. mobile network operators) have to manage high speed data traffic from the increased number of subscribers to improve the subscribers’ experience by providing a good quality of service (QoS).
Typically QoS in the LTE network is defined by parameters such as a priority a data packet delay budget and a data packet loss rate. Generally to provide a good QoS the LTE network prioritizes data packets associated with applications and services (e.g. mobile services) such that minimum data packet delay budget and data packet loss rate are ensured. The above mentioned parameters are further associated with a logical connectivity between the LTE network and devices (e.g. mobile devices) of the subscribers. The logical connectivity is of two types namely default evolved packet service (EPS) bearers and dedicated EPS bearers. Typically the default EPS bearers and the dedicated EPS bearers are implemented in LTE network elements such as a packet data network gateway (PDN GW) and a service gateway (SGW) to be compliant with LTE network standards. Further the devices of the subscribers supporting the default EPS bearers and dedicated EPS bearers will be able to communicate with the LTE network.
However in the case where the default EPS bearers are used there is no guaranteed bit rate (GBR) between the devices and the PDN GW/SGW due to lack of prioritization of the data packets or due to preferential treatment of the data packets. As a result a high priority low delay application data packet gets the same LTE network treatment as a low priority high delay application data packet. Also in the case where the dedicated EPS bearers are used application data packets are ensured a GBR due to priority processing in the PDN GW/SGW. As a result the data packets over the default EPS bearers get a de-prioritized treatment in the PDN GW/SGW. This can end up increasing the data packet delay budget and data packet loss rate.
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Form-5.pdf | 2012-09-14 |
| 2 | Form-3.pdf | 2012-09-14 |
| 3 | Form-1.pdf | 2012-09-14 |
| 4 | Drawings.pdf | 2012-09-14 |
| 5 | 3735-CHE-2012 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 08-10-2012.pdf | 2012-10-08 |
| 6 | 3735-CHE-2012 FORM-9 08-10-2012.pdf | 2012-10-08 |
| 7 | 3735-CHE-2012 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 25-10-2012.pdf | 2012-10-25 |
| 8 | 3735-CHE-2012 FORM-1 25-10-2012.pdf | 2012-10-25 |
| 9 | 3735-CHE-2012 FORM-18 09-11-2012.pdf | 2012-11-09 |
| 10 | 3735-CHE-2012 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 09-11-2012.pdf | 2012-11-09 |
| 11 | 3735-CHE-2012 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 27-03-2013.pdf | 2013-03-27 |
| 12 | 3735-CHE-2012-FER.pdf | 2018-11-05 |
| 13 | 3735-CHE-2012-FORM 3 [03-05-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-05-03 |
| 14 | 3735-CHE-2012-FER_SER_REPLY [03-05-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-05-03 |
| 15 | 3735-CHE-2012-FORM-26 [07-09-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-09-07 |
| 16 | 3735-CHE-2012-Correspondence to notify the Controller [07-09-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-09-07 |
| 17 | 3735-CHE-2012-Written submissions and relevant documents [07-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-07 |
| 18 | 3735-CHE-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-07 |
| 19 | 3735-CHE-2012-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [07-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-07 |
| 20 | 3735-CHE-2012-Annexure [07-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-07 |
| 21 | 3735-CHE-2012-PatentCertificate09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 22 | 3735-CHE-2012-Marked up Claims_Granted 353331_09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 23 | 3735-CHE-2012-IntimationOfGrant09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 24 | 3735-CHE-2012-Drawings_Granted 353331_09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 25 | 3735-CHE-2012-Description_Granted 353331_09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 26 | 3735-CHE-2012-Claims_Granted 353331_09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 27 | 3735-CHE-2012-Abstract_Granted 353331_09-12-2020.pdf | 2020-12-09 |
| 28 | 3735-CHE-2012-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-23-09-2020).pdf | 2021-10-17 |
| 29 | 3735-CHE-2012-PROOF OF ALTERATION [05-09-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-09-05 |
| 30 | 3735-CHE-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [27-09-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-09-27 |
| 31 | 3735-CHE-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [30-09-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-09-30 |
| 1 | SS_02-11-2018.pdf |