Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Method For The Production Of Acrylic Acid From Propane

Abstract: The invention concerns the production of acrylic acid from propane in the presence of molecular oxygen. Said method consists in passing a gas mixture comprising propane, molecular oxygen, water vapour and,otionally, an inert gas, on a catalyst of formula (I) Mo1VaTebNbcSidOx to oxidize propane into acrylic acid, the propane/molecular oxygen mol ratio in the initial gas mixture being not less than 0.5.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
09 March 2005
Publication Number
09/2006
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
CHEMICAL
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2008-03-06
Renewal Date

Applicants

ARKEMA
4/8,COURS MICHELET,92800 PUTEAUX

Inventors

1. DUBOIS JEAN-LUC
190 RUE DU COTEAU,69390 MILLELRY
2. DESDEVISES FABIENNE
3 RUE DU GUYCHOLET,69390 MILLERY
3. SERREAU STEPHANIE
25 BIS RUE DE LA SARRA,69600 OULLINS
4. VITRY DAMIEN
ROUTE D'ARC-EN BARROIS,F-52120 RICHEBOURG
5. UEDA WATARU
1979-57 NARUSE,MACHIDA-SHI,TOKYO

Specification

METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ACRYLIC ACID FROM PROPANE
The present invention relates to the method for the production of acrylic
acid from propane.
presence of molecular oxygen.
It is known from European patent application No. EP-A-608838 to prepare an
unsaturated carboxylic acid from an alkane according to a catalytic oxidation reaction
in vapour phase in the presence of a catalyst containing a mixed metal oxide
comprising as essential components, Mo, V, Te, O, as well as at least one element
chosen from the group constituted by niobium, tantalum, tungsten, titanium,
aluminium, zirconium, chromium, manganese, iron, ruthenium, cobalt, rhodium,
nickel, palladium, platinum, antimony, bismuth, boron, indium and cerium, these
elements being present in very precise proportions. The reaction can be implemented
using a gaseous mixture composed of the alkane, oxygen, an inert gas and water
vapour corresponding to the following molar proportions:
alkane/oxygen/inert gas/water vapour = 1/0.1-10/0-20/0.2-70 and preferably 1/1-5/0-
10/5-40.
Moreover, the European patent application No. EP-A-895809 describes catalysts
based on oxides comprising molybdenum, vanadium, niobium, oxygen, tellurium
and/or antimony, as well as at least one other element such as iron or aluminium.
These catalysts can be used for the conversion of propane to acrylic acid, in the
presence of molecular oxygen, as illustrated in Examples 9 and 10. Example 9, in
particular, describes the oxidation of propane using a catalyst of formula
Mo1V0.33Nb11 Te0.22On from a gas flow composed of propane, oxygen, helium and a
flow of water vapour, according to a molar ratio propane/oxygen/helium/water vapour
of approximately 1/3.2/12.1/14.3. In such a gas flow, the flow of reactive gas has a
very low concentration of propane. Consequently the recycling of the unconverted
propane is much more difficult because this unconverted propane is too diluted in the
reaction flow.
The aim of the invention is to propose a method for the production of acrylic acid
from propane, in the presence of molecular oxygen, which allows a higher conversion
of propane to be obtained while retaining good acrylic acid selectivity.
The inventors have discovered that this aim can be achieved by passing a gaseous
mixture of propane, oxygen and water vapour, and if appropriate an inert gas, over a
particular catalyst, under conditions such that the oxygen of the gaseous mixture is in
a substoichiometric proportion in relation to the propane introduced, which probably
allows the catalyst to act in a similar way to a redox system and provides the oxygen
which is lacking so that the reaction is carried out in a satisfactory way.
The advantages of this novel method are the following:-
- the limitation of the overoxidation of the products formed which takes place in
the presence of too great a quantity of molecular oxygen; according to the
present invention, due to the fact of operating in substoichiometry, the
formation of COX (carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide), degradation
products, is reduced, which allows the acrylic acid selectivity to be increased;
- the acrylic acid selectivity is maintained at a good level;
the conversion is increased without loss of selectivity;
the catalyst undergoes only a low reduction and therefore a small loss of its
activity; it can easily be regenerated by heating in the presence of oxygen or a
gas containing oxygen after a certain period of use; after regeneration, the
catalyst regains its initial activity and can be used in another reaction cycle;
- moreover, the separation of the stages of reduction of the catalyst and of
regeneration of the latter can be provided which allows the partial pressure of
propane to be increased, such a partial supply pressure of propane being little
limited by the existence of an explosive zone created by the propane + oxygen
mixture, because the later is present in molecular form in substoichiometric
proportions;
moreover, this method allows reduction of the formation of products produced
by hydration, in particular propionic acid, acetone and acetic acid.
The subject of the present invention is therefore a method for the production of
acrylic acid from propane, in which a gaseous mixture containing propane, molecular
oxygen, water vapour as well as, if appropriate, an inert gas, is passed over a catalyst
of formula (I):
in which:
- a is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
-b is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- d is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive; and
- x is the quantity of oxygen bound to the other elements and depends on their
oxidation state.
in order to oxidize the propane to acrylic acid, this method being characterized in that
the molar ratio propane/molecular oxygen in the initial gaseous mixture is greater than
or equal to 0.5.
Such a method allows an acrylic acid selectivity to be obtained of close to 60 %
and a high conversion of propane. Moreover, it can easily be implemented in a
fluidized bed or in a moving bed and the injection of the reagents can be carried out at
different points of the reactor, so as to be outside of the flammability zone while
having a high propane concentration and, consequently, a high catalyst productivity.
According to a particularly advantageous embodiment, the method according to
the invention comprises the following stages:
a) the gaseous mixture is introduced into a first reactor with a moving catalyst
bed,
b) at the outlet of the first reactor, the gases are separated from the catalyst;
c) the catalyst is returned into a regenerator;
d) the gases are introduced into a second reactor with a moving catalyst bed;
e) at the outlet of the second reactor, the gases are separated from the catalyst and
the acrylic acid contained in the separated gases is recovered;
f) the catalyst is returned into the regenerator; and
g) the regenerated catalyst from the regenerator is reintroduced into the first and
second reactors;
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the reactor or
reactors are also provided with a cocatalyst. The above stages can be carried out in a
similar way using a catalyst and a cocatalyst.
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the method
comprises the repetition, in a reactor provided with the catalyst of formula (I) and, if
appropriate, with a cocatalyst, of the cycle comprising the following successive
stages:
1) a stage of injection of the gaseous mixture as defined above;
2) a stage of injection of water vapour and, if appropriate of inert gas;
3) a stage of injection of a mixture of molecular oxygen, water vapour and, if
appropriate, inert gas; and
4) a stage of injection of water vapour and, if appropriate inert gas.
According to an improvement of the advantageous embodiment which has just
been described, the cycle comprises an additional stage which precedes or follows
stage 1) and during which a gaseous mixture corresponding to that of stage 1) is
injected but without the molecular oxygen, the molar ratio propane/ molecular oxygen
then being calculated globally for stage 1) and this additional stage.
According to an advantageous embodiment of the improvement which has just
been presented, the additional stage precedes stage 1) in the cycle.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will now be described in
detail in the following description which is given with reference to the single attached
figure which diagrammatically represents an apparatus which is suitable for the
implementation of an advantageous embodiment of the method according to the
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, because the molar ratio propane/molecular oxygen in
the initial gaseous mixture is greater than 0.5, the conversion of the propane to acrylic
acid using the catalyst is carried out by oxidation, probably according to the following
concurrent reactions (1) and (2):
- the standard catalytic reaction (1):
- and the redox reaction (2):
The propane/water vapour volume ratio in the initial gaseous mixture is not
critical and can vary within wide limits.
Similarly, the proportion of inert gas, which can be helium, krypton, a mixture of
these two gasses, or nitrogen, carbon dioxide, etc., is also not critical and can also
vary within wide limits.
The proportions of the constituents of the initial gaseous mixture are generally as
follows (in molar ratios):
propane/oxygen/inert(He-Kr)/H2O (vapour) =
1/0.05-2/1-10/1-10
Preferably, they are 1/0.1-1/1-5/1-5.
Yet more preferably, they are 1/0.167-0.667/2-5/2-5. As particularly beneficial
proportions the following may also be cited:
1/0.2-0.4/4-5/4-5.
Generally, reactions (1) and (2) are carried out at a temperature of 200 to 500°C,
preferably from 250 to 450°C, yet more preferably from 350 to 400°C.
The pressure in the reactor or reactors is generally from 1.01x104 to 1.01xl06
Pa (0.1 to 10 atmospheres), preferably from 5.05x104 to 5.05x105 Pa (0.5-5
atmospheres).
The residence time in the reactor, or if there are several, in each reactor, is
generally from 0.01 to 90 seconds, preferably from 0.1 to 30 seconds.
The catalyst corresponds to the formula (I):
Mo1VaTebNbcSidOx (I)
in which:
- a is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- b is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- d is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive; and
- x is the quantity of oxygen bound to the other elements and depends on their
oxidation state.
Advantageously:
- a is comprised between 0.09 and 0.8, inclusive;
- b is comprised between 0.04 and 0.6, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.01 and 0.4, inclusive; and
- d is comprised between 0.4 and 1.6, inclusive.
The oxides of the different metals included in the composition of the catalyst of
formula (I) can be used as raw materials in the preparation of this catalyst, but the raw
materials are not limited to the oxides; as other raw materials, there may be
mentioned:
- in the case of molybdenum, ammonium molybdate, ammonium
paramolybdate, ammonium heptamolybdate, molybdic acid, molybdenum
halides or oxyhalides such as MoCl5, organometallic compounds of
molybdenum such as molybdenum alkoxides such as Mo(OC2H5)5,
acetylacetone molybdenyl;
- in the case of vanadium, ammonium metavanadate, vanadium halides or
oxyhalides such as VCl4, VCl5 or VOCl3, organometallic compounds of
vanadium such as vanadium alkoxides such as VO(OC2H5)3;
- in the case of tellurium, tellurium, telluric acid and TeO2;
- in the case of niobium, niobic acid, niobium tartrate, niobium hydrogen
oxalate, oxotrioxalatoammonium niobate {(NH4)3[NbO(C2O4)3]*1.5H2O},
niobium and ammonium oxalate, niobium oxalate and tartrate, nobium
halides or oxyhalides such as NbCl3, NbCl5 and organometallic compounds
of niobium such as niobium alkoxides such as Nb(OC2H5)5, Nb(O-n-Bu)5;
and, generally, all the compounds which are able to form an oxide by calcination,
namely, the metallic salts of organic acids, the metallic salts of mineral acids, the
metal complex compounds, etc.
The source of silicon is generally constituted by colloidal silica and/or polysilicic
acid.
According to particular embodiments, the catalyst of formula (I) can be prepared
by mixing aqueous solutions of niobic acid, ammonium heptamolybdate, ammonium
metavanadate, telluric acid under stirring, by the addition preferably of colloidal
silica, then by precalcinating under air between 280 and 340 C, preferably at
approximately 320 C and by calcinating under nitrogen at approximately 600 C.
Preferably, in the catalyst of formula (I):
- a is comprised between 0.09 and 0.8, inclusive;
- b is comprised between 0.04 and 0.6, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.01 and 0.4, inclusive; and
- d is comprised between 0.4 and 1.6, inclusive.
Preferred method for the preparation of the catalyst of formula (I)
The catalyst of formula (I) can be prepared using a method in which:
1) a solution of niobium is prepared by mixing oxalic acid and niobic acid, then
optionally separation with a view to recovering the solute;
2) a solution of molybdenum, vanadium and tellurium is prepared;
3) the two preceding solutions are coprecipitated by adding a silica solution;
4) the precipitate is dried, which produces a precursor with the formula:
in which
a, b, c, d and x are defined as previously and
e is comprised between 0.006 and 3.5, inclusive;
y is comprised between 0.006 and 3.5, inclusive;
5) the precursor is precalcinated; then
6) the precursor is calcinated.
The separation of stage 1) can be carried out by centrifugation, decantation or
filtration.
The drying of stage 4) can be carried out in an oven in a thin layer, by
atomization, freeze-drying, zeodration, with micro waves etc.
The precalculation can be carried out under air flow at 270 - 300°C or under static
air at 320°C, in a fluidized bed, in a rotary tube, in a so-called aerated fixed bed, so
that the catalyst pellets are separated from each other in order to prevent them from
fusing during precalcination or possibly during calcination.
The calcination is preferably carried out under very pure nitrogen and at a
temperature less than 600°C, for example in a rotary furnace, in a fixed bed, in a
fluidized bed and for a duration which can be 2 hours.
The catalyst obtained at the end of the calcination can be ground in order to
produce smaller particles. If the grinding is continued until a powder constituted by
particles of approximately the size of a micron is obtained, the powder can
subsequently be returned to its form using a binding agent such as for example silica
in the form of polysilicic acid, the suspension then being dried again, for example by
atomization.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the precalcination is carried out
- either at a temperature of approximately 275°C under an air flow of at least 10
ml/min/g of catalyst;
- or at a temperature ranging from 300 to 350°C under an air flow less than 10
ml/min/g of catalyst.
According to a most particularly preferred embodiment, the precalcination is
carried out at approximately 320°C under no air flow.
Regeneration of the catalyst
During the redox reaction (2), the catalyst undergoes reduction and a progressive
loss of its activity. This is why, once the catalyst has at least partially changed to the
reduced state, its regeneration is carried out according to reaction (3):
SOLIDreduced + O2 ? SOLIDoxidized (3)
by heating in the presence of oxygen or a gas containing oxygen at a temperature of
250 to 500 C, for a time necessary for the reoxidation of the catalyst.
The proportions of the constituents of the regeneration gaseous mixture are
generally as follows (in molar ratios):
oxygen/inert(He-Kr)H2O( vapour) =
1/1-10/0-10
Preferably, they are 1/1-5/0-5..
Instead of using the oxygen alone, dry air (21% O2) can be used. Instead of or in
addition to the water vapour, moist air can thus be used.
Generally the method is carried out until the reduction ratio of the catalyst is
comprised between 0.1 and 10 g of oxygen per kg of catalyst.
This reduction ratio can be monitored during the reaction through the quantity of
products obtained. Then the equivalent quantity of oxygen is calculated. It can also
be monitored through the exothermicity of the reaction. The reduction ratio can also
be monitored through the quantity of oxygen consumed in the regenerator.
After regeneration, which can be carried out under temperature and pressure
conditions which are identical to, or different from those of the reactions (1) and (2),
the catalyst regains an initial activity and can be reintroduced into the reactors.
The reactions (1) and (2) and the regeneration (3) can be carried out in a standard
reactor, such as a fixed bed reactor, a fluidized bed reactor or a moving bed reactor.
Thus the reactions (1) and (2) and the regeneration (3) can be carried out in a
device with two stages, namely a reactor and a regenerator which operate
simultaneously and in which two catalyst loadings alternate periodically.
The reactions (1) and (2) and the regeneration (3) can also be carried out in the
same reactor by alternating the periods of reaction and regeneration.
Preferably, the reactions (1) and (2) and the regeneration (3) are carried out in a
reactor with a moving catalyst bed, in particular in a vertical reactor, the catalyst then
preferably moving from the bottom upwards.
A operating method with only one passage of the gas or with recycling of the gas
can be used.
According to a preferred embodiment, the propylene produced and/or the propane
which has not reacted are recycled (or returned) to the inlet of the reactor, i.e. they are
reintroduced at the inlet of the reactor, in a mixture or in parallel with the initial
mixture of propane, water vapour and if appropriate inert gas or gases.
Use of an apparatus with two reactors and a regenerator
According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the method according
to the invention is used in an apparatus such as the one represented in the attached
figure.
The initial gaseous mixture comprising propane, molecular oxygen, water vapour
as well as, if appropriate, an inert gas, is introduced into a first reactor (Riser 1)
containing the moving catalyst bed.
Then, at the outlet of the first reactor, the effluents are separated into gases and the
moving bed catalyst.
The catalyst is sent into a regenerator.
The gases are introduced into a second reactor (Riser 2) also containing a moving
catalyst bed.
At the outlet of the second reactor, the effluents are separated into gases and the
moving bed catalyst.
The catalyst is sent into a regenerator.
The gases are treated in a known way, generally by absorption and purification,
with a view to recovering the acrylic acid produced.
The regenerated catalyst is reintroduced into the first reactor as well as into the
second reactor.
The method thus operates continuously, the circulation of the catalyst between the
reactors and the regenerator is carried out in a regular and generally continuous way.
Of course, the single regenerator can be replaced by two or more regenerators.
Moreover, it is possible to add, after the second reactor, other reactors which also
have a catalyst circulating between each of these reactors and the regenerator or other
regenerators.
Preferably, the first and second reactors are vertical and the catalyst is transported
upwards by the gas flow.
A method of operating with only one passage of gases or with recycling of the
products leaving the second reactor can be used.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, after treatment of the gas
originating from the second reactor, the propylene produced and/or the propane which
has not reacted are recycled (or returned) to the inlet of the reactor, i.e. they are
reintroduced at the inlet of the first reactor, in a mixture or in parallel with the initial
mixture of propane, oxygen, water vapour and if appropriate of inert gas or gases.
Use of a cocatalyst
According to another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the gaseous
mixture also passes over a cocatalyst.
This has the advantage of reducing the production of propionic acid, which is
generally a by-product of the conversion reaction and which poses problems in certain
applications of acrylic acid when it is present in too great a quantity.
Thus, the propionic acid /acrylic acid ratio is greatly reduced at the outlet of the
reactor.
Moreover, the formation of acetone, which is also a by-product of the
production of acrylic acid from propane, is reduced.
To this end, at least one of the reactors comprises a cocatalyst with the following
formula (II):
in which:
- a' is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- b' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- c' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- d' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- e' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- f is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- g' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- h' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- i' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- j' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- k' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- l' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- m' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive; and
- n' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive.
Such a cocatalyst can be prepared in the same way as the catalyst of formula (I).
The oxides of the different metals included in the composition of the cocatalyst
of formula (II) can be used as raw materials in the preparation of this cocatalyst, but
the raw materials are not limited to the oxides; as other raw materials, the
corresponding nitrates can be mentioned in the case of nickel, cobalt, bismuth, iron or
potassium.
Generally, the cocatalyst is present in the form of a moving bed and preferably it
is regenerated and circulates, if appropriate, in the same way as the catalyst.
Preferably, in the cocatalyst of formula (II):
- a' is comprised between 0.01 and 0.4, inclusive;
- b' is comprised between 0.2 and 1.6, inclusive;
- c' is comprised between 0.3 and 1.6, inclusive;
- d' is comprised between 0.1 and 0.6, inclusive;
- e' is comprised between 0.006 and 0.01, inclusive.
- f is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- g' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- h' is comprised between 0.01 and 1.6, inclusive;
- i' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- j' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- k' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- l' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- m' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive; and
- n' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive.
The weight ratio of the catalyst to the cocatalyst is generally greater than 0.5 and
preferably at least 1.
Advantageously, the cocatalyst is present in the two reactors.
The catalyst and the cocatalyst are present in the form of solid catalytic
compositions.
They can each be in the form of pellets, generally of 20 to 300 µm in diameter,
the catalyst and cocatalyst pellets generally being mixed before implementation of the
method according to the invention.
The catalyst and the cocatalyst can also be present in the form of a solid
catalytic composition composed of pellets each of which comprises both the catalyst
and the cocatalyst.
Examples
The following examples illustrate the present invention without limiting its
scope.
In the formulae given in Example 1, x is the quantity of oxygen bound to the
other elements and depends on their oxidation states.
The conversions, selectivities and yields are defined as follows:
The selectivities and yields relating to the other compounds are calculated in a similar
way.
The conversion ratio is the weight of catalyst (in kg) required to convert 1 kg of
propane.
Example 1
Preparation of the catalyst of formula Mo1V0.33Nb0.11Te0.22Si0.95Ox
a) Preparation of a solution of niobium
640 g of distilled water then 51.2g of niobic acid (i.e. 0.304 moles of niobium)
are introduced into a 5 1 beaker. Then 103.2 g (0.816 moles) of dehydrated oxalic
acid is added.
The molar ratio oxalic acid/niobium is therefore 2.69.
The solution obtained previously is heated at 60 C for 2 hours, being covered so
as to avoid evaporation and with stirring. Thus a white suspension is obtained which
is left to cool to 30 C under stirring, which takes approximately 2 hours.
b) Preparation of a solution of Mo, V and Te
2120 g of distilled water, 488 g of ammonium heptamolybdate (i.e. 2.768 moles
of molybdenum), 106.4 g of ammonium metavanadate NH4VO3 (i.e. 0.912 moles of
vanadium) and 139.2 g of telluric acid (supplier: FLUKA) (i.e. 0.608 moles of
tellurium) are introduced into a 5 1 beaker.
The solution obtained previously is heated at 60 C for 1 hour and 20 minutes,
being covered so as to avoid evaporation and with stirring. In this way a clear red
solution is obtained which is left to cool to 30 C under stirring, which takes
approximately 2 hours.
c) Introduction of the silica
393.6g of Ludox silica (containing 40% by weight of silica, supplied by Dupont)
is introduced under stirring into the previously prepared solution of Mo, V and Te.
The latter retains its limpidity and its red colouring.
Then the previously prepared solution of niobium is added. In this way a
fluorescent orange gel is obtained after stirring for a few minutes. This solution is
then dried by atomization. The atomizer used is a laboratory atomizer (ATSELAB
from Sodeva). The atomization takes place in a nitrogen atmosphere.
The working parameters are globally:
- flow rate of nitrogen of the order of 45 Nm3/h;
- flow rate of slurry of the order of 500 g/h;
- inlet temperature of the gas comprised between 155°C and 170°C;
- outlet temperature of the gas comprised between 92°C and 100°C.
Then the product recovered (355.2g), which has a particle size less than 40
microns, is placed in an oven overnight at 130 C, in a teflon-covered plate.
In this way 331 g of dry product is obtained.
d) Calcination
The precalcinations and calcinations were carried out under air and nitrogen
flow in steel capacitors. These capacitors are directly installed in muffle furnaces and
the air is supplied via the flue. An internal thermometer well allows precise
monitoring of the temperature. The cover is useful to prevent air returning towards
the catalyst.
Firstly, the 331 g of precursor obtained previously are precalcinated for 4 hours
at 300 C under air flow of 47.9ml/min/g of precursor.
The solid obtained is then calcinated for 2 hours at 600°C under a nitrogen flow
of 12.8 ml/min/g of solid.
In this way the desired catalyst is obtained.
Example 2
Catalyst tests
a) Apparatus
In order to simulate the method according to the invention, simulations were
carried out in a laboratory fixed bed reactor, by generating propane pulses and oxygen
pulses.
The following are loaded from the bottom to the top of a vertical reactor with
cylindrical shape and made of pyrex:
- a first height of 1 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.125 mm in
diameter,
a second height of 1 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.062 mm
in diameter,
- a third height of 5 g of catalyst in the form of particles of 0.02 to 1 mm diluted
with 10 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.062 mm in diameter,
a fourth height of 1 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.062 mm
in diameter,
- a fifth height of 3 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.125 mm in
diameter and
- a sixth height of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 1.19 mm in
diameter so as to fill all of the reactor.
b) Operating method
The reactor is then heated to 250 C and the vaporiser to 200 C. The electric
initiation of the water pump is actuated.
Once the reactor and the vaporiser have reached the temperatures given above,
the water pump is actuated and the temperature of the reactor is raised to the desired
test temperature, i.e. 400 C.
The hot spot of the reactor is then left to stabilize for 30 minutes.
Then, oxygen is introduced in 10 pulses of 23 seconds each in order to
sufficiently oxidize the catalyst. The catalyst is considered to be totally oxidized
when the temperature of the hot spot has stabilized, i.e. when there is no more
exothermal activity due to the reaction (by monitoring the catalyst temperature
measured using a thermocouple placed in the catalyst bed, the fluctuations in
temperature can be seen as a function of the pulses).
The pressure at the inlet of the reactor was approximately 1.1 to 1.8 bars
(absolute) and the pressure drop across the reactor is approximately 0.1 to 0.8 bars
(relative).
Test A
- The production of acrylic acid was measured using a redox balance.
- A redox balance is composed of 40 redox cycles. A redox cycle represents:
- 10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 5 seconds of oxygen (oxygen being injected at the
start of the propane pulse), with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of
10/10/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of 4.292 Nl/h (Nl = litre of gas at
0°C and 760 mm Hg);
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
45 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 45 seconds;
10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 10 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 10/10/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
45 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 45 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 15 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 10/10/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 N1/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
45 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and.
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 45 seconds; and
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 20 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 10/10/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
45 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 45 seconds.
During the balancing, four samples are taken, each representing 10 cycles. 4
samples of gas are also carried out using gas bags, each sample representing
approximately 10 cycles. (The gas samples are carried out over a period
corresponding to a multiple of the duration of a cycle, in order to be able to know the
theoretical quantity of propane injected).
Each small gas-washing bottle (with a 25 ml capacity and filled with 20 ml of
water) is equipped with a gas bag, and when the bottle is connected to the outlet of the
reactor (as soon as the liquid bubbles), the bag is open and the chronometer is started.
In order to verify the oxidation state of the catalyst, another series of ten 23-
second pulses of oxygen is carried out. It shows that the oxidation state of the solid
has been maintained during the balancing (no exothermal activity).
The liquid effluents are analyzed on a HP 6890 chromatograph, after having
carried out a specific calibration.
The gases are analyzed during the balancing on a Chrompack micro-GC
chromatograph.
An assay of the acidity is carried out on each bottle during the operation, in
order to determine the exact number of moles of acid produced and to validate the
chromatographic analyses.
Test B
The procedure was undertaken as in test A, except that the redox balance was
composed of the following 40 redox cycles:
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 5 seconds of oxygen, (the oxygen being injected at
the start of the propane pulse) with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of
20/15/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of 4.292 N1/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 10 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/02/He-Kr/H20 of 20/15/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O) = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 15 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 20/15/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds; and
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 20 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 20/15/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
Test C
The procedure was the same as in test A, except that the redox balance was
composed of the following 40 redox cycles:
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 5 seconds of oxygen, (the oxygen being injected at
the start of the propane pulse) with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of
20/20/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of 4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O) = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 10 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 20/10/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 15 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 20/6.7/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 N1/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds; and
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 20 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 20/5/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of 4.292
Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds.
Test D
The procedure was the same as in test A, except that the redox balance was
composed of the following 40 redox cycles:
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 5 seconds of oxygen, (the oxygen being injected at
the start of the propane pulse) with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of
30/30/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of 4.292 N1/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions 02/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 seconds
and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 10 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/15/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60
seconds and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 15 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/10/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60
seconds and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds; and
-10 cycles of:
- 30 seconds of propane + 20 seconds of oxygen, with the proportions
propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/7.5/45/45, with a flow of helium-krypton of
4.292 Nl/h;
- an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of
60 seconds;
- an oxygen pulse with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60
seconds and
- another intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 seconds;
c) Results
The final results correspond to the microbalances carried out on the 4 gas-
washing bottles and the 4 gas bags.
In tests A and B, the quantity of oxygen injected was increasing when
changing from one series of 10 cycles to another, because the duration of the oxygen
pulse was increasing.
In tests C and D, the quantity of oxygen remained constant when changing
from one series of 10 cycles to another. In fact, although the duration of the oxygen
pulse increased form one series of 10 cycles to another, the proportion of oxygen in
the pulse was adjusted (reduced) each time.
The results are compiled in the following Tables I and II:
From Table I above the following observations can be drawn:
- in the same test A or B, the larger the quantity of oxygen injected, the higher
the acrylic acid selectivity;
- tests C and D show that it is better to have a high partial pressure of oxygen
for a short time than the same quantity of oxygen for a longer time.
From Table II the following observations can be drawn:
- the quantity of oxygen consumed, calculated on the basis of the products
formed, does not increase much with the addition of molecular oxygen and the
conversion does not change much with the addition of molecular oxygen;
- the quantity of oxygen consumed (in µmoles of atomic oxygen) is greater than
the quantity added by the pulse; this means that the catalyst was reduced in
any case;
- the conversion is higher in Test A;
- the lowest conversion ratio is obtained when the partial pressure of propane is
highest.
Example 3 (comparative)
A catalyst was prepared in the following way.
5.35 g of ammonium paramolybdate and 0.80 g of tellurium dioxide (TeO2) are
successively added under stirring into 20 ml of water,. Separately, a solution
containing 15 mmoles of vanadium is prepared by dissolving 3.94 g of hydrated
vanadyl sulphate in 20 ml of distilled water. The two solutions are then slowly mixed
and stirred for 10 minutes before being introduced into a 70 ml autoclave covered
with Teflon®. Then nitrogen is bubbled through for 5 minutes so that it substitutes the
air present in the autoclave, before the latter is closed. The autoclave is then set at
175°C for 72 hours.
After this period, the autoclave is cooled with water under the tap for 10 minutes. The
black solid obtained in the autoclave is separated from the solution by filtration,
thoroughly washed with distilled water and dried for 12 hours at 80°C. The precursor
thus obtained is then precalcinated under air at 280°C for 2 hours. Then, the solid
obtained is calcinated under nitrogen flow (25 ml/h/g) at 600°C for 2 hours. In this
way catalyst 3 is obtained.
Test conditions
500 mg of catalyst 3 are vigorously ground and poured into a reactor made of
Pyrex®. The selective oxidation reaction for propane is carried out at atmospheric
pressure, in a reactor under a conventional flow. The gaseous reaction mixture
propane/oxygen/nitrogen/water vapour (6.5 %/10 %/38 %/45 %) is introduced into the
reactor maintaining a contact time of 2.1 s. The catalyst is tested at 320 and 360°C.
The results are compiled in Tables 2 and 3.
Example 4
A catalyst was prepared in the following way.
4.32 g of molybdenum oxide, 0.80 g of tellurium dioxide (TeO2) and 0.82 g of
vanadium oxide V2O5 are added successively and under stirring to 30 ml of water
heated to 80°C. Separately, a solution containing 3.6 mmoles of niobium is prepared
by dissolving under stirring, 2.33 g of hydrated niobium oxalate in 10 ml of distilled
water heated to 80°C. The two solutions are then slowly mixed and stirred for 10
minutes before being introduced into a 70 ml autoclave covered with Teflon®. Then
nitrogen is bubbled through for 5 minutes so that it replaces the air present in the
autoclave, before the latter is closed. The autoclave is then set at 175°C for 48 hours.
After this time, the autoclave is cooled down with tap water, for 10 minutes.
The black-blue solid obtained in the autoclave is separated from the solution by
filtration, washed thoroughly with distilled water and dried for 12 hours at 80°C. The
precursor thus obtained is then calcinated under nitrogen flow (25 ml/h/g) at 600°C
for 2 hours. In this way catalyst 4 is obtained. This catalyst is tested under the same
conditions as catalyst 3. The results are compiled in Tables 2 and 3.
Example 5
A catalyst was prepared in the following way.
5.35 g of ammonium paramolybdate and 1.16 g of telluric acid are successively added
to 20 ml of water heated to 80°C under stirring. Separately, a solution containing 9
mmoles of vanadium is prepared by dissolving 2.37 g of hydrated vanadyl sulphate in
10 ml of distilled water heated to 80°C. A third solution containing 3.6 mmole of
niobium is simultaneously prepared by dissolving under stirring, 2.33 g of hydrated
niobium oxalate in 10 ml of distilled water heated to 80°C. The second solution is
added to the first and the mixture is stirred for 5 minutes. Finally the third solution is
added and the mixture is then stirred for 10 minutes before being introduced into a 70
ml autoclave covered with Teflon®. Then nitrogen is bubbled through for 5 minutes
so that it substitutes the air present in the autoclave, before the latter is closed. The
autoclave is then set at 175°C for 48 hours.
After this time, the autoclave is cooled down with tap water, for 10 minutes.
The black-blue solid obtained in the autoclave is separated from the solution by
filtration, washed thoroughly with distilled water and dried for 12 hours at 80°C. The
precursor thus obtained is then calcinated under nitrogen flow (25 ml/h/g) at 600°C
for 2 hours. In this way catalyst 5 is obtained. This catalyst is tested under the same
conditions as catalyst 3. The results are compiled in Tables 2 and 3.
Example 6
A catalyst was prepared in the following way.
5.35 g of ammonium paramolybdate is added to 20 ml of water heated to 80°C under
stirring. Separately, a solution containing 15 mmoles of vanadium is prepared by
dissolving 3.94 g of hydrated vanadyl sulphate in 20 ml of distilled water heated to
80°C. The second solution is added to the first and the mixture is then stirred for 10
minutes before being introduced into a 70 ml autoclave covered with Teflon®. Then
nitrogen is bubbled through for 5 minutes so that it substitutes the air present in the
autoclave, before the latter is closed. The autoclave is then set at 175°C for 24 hours.
After this time, the autoclave is cooled down with tap water, for 10 minutes.
The black-blue solid obtained in the autoclave is separated from the solution by
filtration, washed thoroughly with distilled water and dried for 12 hours at 80°C. The
precursor thus obtained is then calcinated under nitrogen flow (25 ml/h/g) at 500°C
for 2 hours. In this way catalyst 6 is obtained. This catalyst is tested under the same
conditions as catalyst 3.
According to a similar operating method, tellurium can be introduced into this
preparation.
In the case of Examples 3 and 5, the effluents of the test are collected for 4
hours in an ice-trap. 2 analyses by chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometer
are carried out per sample.
5 main products are detected per sample: acetone, water, acetic acid, propionic
acid and acrylic acid.
The molar ratios propionic acid/acrylic acid are thus calculated for each
sample, for reaction temperatures of 320°C and 360°C. The average of the two
analyses carried out per sample is given in Table 4 below.
It is noted that the molar ratio decreases with an increase in the temperature.
But also this ratio is still smaller for the catalysts containing niobium.
Similarly as regards the acetone selectivity, this is even smaller when the catalyst
contains niobium.
Example 7
In one example the catalyst prepared in Example 1 was tested again. This
catalyst has a particle size of less than 40 µm.
Then a reactor was loaded as shown in Example 2a) and operated according to
the operating method shown in Example 2b).
i) Test E
In this test the oxidation of t propane is carried out at 400°C.
The duration of oxygen injection into the propane pulse is varied maintaining constant
propane and oxygen pressure.
The oxygen is injected at the end of the propane pulse to see if there is an influence on
the catalytic performances compared to an injection at the start of the pulse.
The balance of 40 cycles is broken down as follows:
10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 20 s of O2 (the oxygen being injected at the end of the
propane pulse), with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a
flow of helium-krypton of 4.27 N1/h.
There is then an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60 s, then a pulse of O2 with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for
60 s and another pulse of carrier gas of 60 s.
Then there is another series of 10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 15 s of oxygen with the
proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of
4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an intermediate pulse composed only of the carrier gas He-
Kr/H2O of 60s, then an oxygen pulse with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45,
for 60 s and another intermediate pulse of carrier gas of 60 s.
Then there is another series of 10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 10 s of O2 with the
proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of
4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier
gas He-Kr/H2O of 60 s, then a pulse of O2 with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O =
20/45/45, for 60 s and another intermediate pulse of carrier gas of 60 s.
Then there is another series of 10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 5 s of O2 with the
proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of
4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier
gas He-Kr/H2O of 60 s, then a pulse of O2 with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O =
20/45/45, for 60 s and another intermediate pulse of carrier gas of 60 s.
ii) Test F
In this test, the oxidation of the propane is also carried out at 400°C.
The effect of the oxygen injection is compared at the end and at the start of the
propane pulse maintaining constant propane and oxygen pressures but also a constant
duration of oxygen injection in the propane pulse.
The balance of 40 cycles is broken down as follows:
10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 20 s of O2 (the oxygen being injected at the end of the
propane pulse), with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a
helium-krypton flow of 4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an intermediate pulse composed only
of the flow of carrier gas He/Kr/H2O of 60s, then an intermediate pulse of O2 with the
proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45 for 60 s and another intermediate pulse of
carrier gas of 60 s.
Then there is another series of 10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 20 s of oxygen (O2
being injected at the end of the propane pulse) with the proportions propane/02/He-
Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of 4.27 N1/h. Then there is an
intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of 60 s, then
an intermediate pulse of oxygen with the proportions O2/He-Rr/H2O = 20/45/45, for
60 s and another intermediate pulse of carrier gas of 60s.
10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 20 s of O2 (the oxygen being injected at the start of the
propane pulse), with the proportions propane/O2/He-Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a
helium-krypton flow of 4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an intermediate pulse composed only
of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of 60 s, then an intermediate pulse of O2 with
the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45, for 60 s and another intermediate pulse of
carrier gas of 60 s.
Then there is another series of 10 cycles of 30 s of propane + 20 s of O2 (the oxygen
being injected at the start of the propane pulse), with the proportions propane/O2/He-
Kr/H2O of 30/30/45/45, with a helium-krypton flow of 4.27 Nl/h. Then there is an
intermediate pulse composed only of the flow of carrier gas He-Kr/H2O of 60 s, then
an intermediate pulse of O2 with the proportions O2/He-Kr/H2O = 20/45/45, for 60 s
and another intermediate pulse of carrier gas of 60 s.
iii) Test G
This test was carried out in a similar way to test F.
iv) Results of the tests
It is seen that the catalytic performances of the catalyst are slightly better when the
oxygen is injected at the end of the propane pulse. The oxygen injected at this time
allows reoxidizing of the already reduced catalyst.
By adding the oxygen to the propane pulse, conversion ratios of the order of 380 to
400 kg/kg can be achieved with selectivities of acrylic acid of 45 % and of propylene
of 13 % while having conversions of 26 %.
Example 8
Preparation of the precursors of catalyst and catalysts
D Synthesis of the precursor P1
This synthesis allows preparation of approximately 100 g of dry precursor.
a) Preparation of the niobium solution
In a 500 ml beaker, the following are introduced:
- 88.0 g of demineralised water;
- 15.9 g of oxalic acid i.e. noxalate = 0.126 moles
- 7.0 g of niobic acid i.e. nNb = 0.042 moles
giving an oxalate/niobium ratio = 3
The solution is stirred while heating to 60°C for 2 hours. However care is taken to not
exceed a heating temperature of 80°C in order to prevent the niobium oxalate formed
from decomposing. At the start the solution is milky. During heating and stirring, the
solution becomes less and less cloudy. It is left to cool to approximately 30°C in
ambient air while stirring continuously. In order to improve the limpidity , the
solution is centrifuged at 6200 r.p.m. for 12 minutes. A white deposit of niobic acid is
then observed.
b) Preparation of the Mo-V-Te solution
In a 500 ml beaker, the following are introduced:
- 292.2 g of demineralised water;
- 19.1 g of telluric acid i.e. nTe = 0.083 moles
- 14.6 g of MVA i.e. nv = 0.125 moles
- 67.1 g of HMA i.e. nMo = 0.380 moles
At first the solution is an orange/yellow colour and cloudy. The mixture is stirred and
heated to approximately 60°C until a limpid red colouring is observed (i.e.
approximately 30 minutes). Then it is left to cool down to 30°C at ambient
temperature while maintaining stirring.
c) Preparation of the Mo-V-Te-Nb-Si gel
54.0 g of silica solution (i.e. nsi = 0.360 moles) is added to the limpid red solution of
Mo-V-Te obtained previously. The solution becomes red/orange and thickens slightly.
It is maintained under stirring. Then the centrifuged solution of niobium is introduced.
A very rapid development of the mixture is observed. In fact, in a few minutes the
solution becomes thicker and more orange. A gel forms. Attention must be paid to the
vortex during thickening of the mixture. This can diminish and make the mixture even
thicker. The stirring must then be increased. Stir again for 45 minutes.
d) Drying of the solution
The orange gel is poured into a teflon-coated plate then placed in an oven at 130°C
overnight. A coarse brown/black powder is then obtained which does not stick to the
plate. The weight of precursor obtained is 122.6 g. Depending on the quantities
introduced initially, the formula of the precursor is
MoV0.33Te0.22Nb0.11Si0.95(Oxalate)0.33(NH4)1.190x.
Other precursors P2, P3 and P4
Table 7 gives the quantities of reagents introduced for the preparation of 3 other
precursors P2, P3 and P4. The same operations as previously were carried out and the
same changes in colouring and appearance were observed for all these experiments.
Loss by combustion
This experiment aims to determine the quantity of niobic acid which did not
dissolve during preparation of the niobium oxalate solution.
During preparation of the precursor P4, the white deposit formed during the
centrifugation was sampled. This deposit has a weight of 0.5 g. It is placed in a
ceramic crucible. After evaporation in ambient air, the deposit weighs 0.4 g. The
deposit is then subjected to a rise in temperature of 3°C/min, from 20 to 600°C and
left at 600°C for one hour.
After this heating, there remains only an Nb2O5 solid which weighs 0.2 g.
Thus there was a total loss of weight of 0.3 g.
Initially, 7.0 g of niobic acid at 79 % or 7*0.79 = 5.53 g of Nb2O5 was
introduced. Thus there was approximately 3.62 % (=0.2/(7*0.79)* 100) of niobic acid
which was not dissolved. Most of the niobic acid is therefore dissolved.
II) Precalcination under air
A precalcination under air is then carried out. The aim of this stage, among
other things, is to eliminate the ammonia produced by the ammonium heptamolybdate
and the ammonium metavanadate. For this, 30 g of precursor is placed inside small
steel cups and between two silica wool wads. Two parameters were adjusted during
the operations:
- the precalcination temperature: desired values 280; 300; 320 and 340°C; and
- the flow rates of air being introduced: desired values 0; 10; 30; 50 ml/min/g of
catalyst.
Only the precalcination time remains the same for all the experiments. It is
fixed at 4 hours.
III) Calcination under nitrogen
A calcination under nitrogen is then carried out.
The flow rate, the temperature and the calcination times are the same for all the
operations.
The conditions are as follows:
- a flow rate of nitrogen of 50 ml/min/g of catalyst.
- a calcination temperature of 600°C.
- a calcination time of 2 hours.
Table 8 gives a summary of the precalcination and calcinations conditions
carried out on the different precursors.
Example 9
a) Apparatus
In order to simulate the method according to the invention, simulations were
carried out in the laboratory in a laboratory fixed bed reactor.
The following are loaded from the bottom to the top of a vertical reactor with
cylindrical shape and made of pyrex:
- a first height of 2 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.125 mm in
diameter,
- a second height of 5.00 g of catalyst in the form of particles of 0.02 to 1 mm
diluted with 10 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.125 mm in
diameter,
- a third height of 2 ml of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 0.125 mm in
diameter, and
- a fourth height of silicon carbide in the form of particles of 1.19 mm in
diameter, so as to fill all of the reactor.
b) Catalyst tests
1) Operating method
The reactor is heated to 250°C and the vaporiser to 200°C. The electric
initiation of the water pump is actuated. The flow rate of He-Kr is set at its nominal
value of 4.25 N1/h.
Once the reactor and the vaporiser have reached the temperatures shown
above, the water pump is actuated. When the water is present at the outlet of the
reactor, the fiowmeters of propane and oxygen are actuated. The reactor temperature
is raised to the desired temperature and left for 30 minutes so that the hot spot is
stabilized.
A thermocouple is placed in the catalyst bed, the temperature of the hot spot
can be read.
Then the measurements relating to the production of acrylic acid itself can be
undertaken.
During each balance, liquid samples are taken. Gas samples are also taken in
line.
Each gas-washing bottle with a capacity of 125 ml is filled with water and
when the flask is connected at the outlet of the reactor (when the liquid bubbles), the
chronometer is started.
The liquid effluents are analyzed on an HP 6890 chromatograph, after having
carried out a specific calibration.
The gases are analyzed in line during the balancing on a Chrompack micro-
GC chromatograph.
An assay of the acidity is carried out on each flask to determine the exact
number of moles of acid produced during each balance and to validate the
chromatographic analyses.
2) Test of the catalysts prepared in Example 8
Catalysts Al to A4, Bl to B4, Cl to C4 and Dl to D4 were tested at 3
different temperatures: 380, 390 and 400°C.
The proportions of the constituents of the initial gaseous mixture were as
follows (in molar ratios):
propane/oxygen/inert(He-Kr)/H2O( vapour) =
1/1/4.5/4.5 for a flow rate of He-Kr of 4.25 N1/h
The temperature giving the best results is 400°C.
The selectivities and yields obtained at this temperature are compiled in Tables
9 and 10 below. In these tables, the temperatures and the flow rates used in the
precalcination of Example 8 as well as the temperatures of the oven and of the hot
spot during the catalyst test are also given.
The yields and selectivities obtained for allyl alcohol and ally acrylate are nil.
Consequently they do not appear in Tables 9 and 10.
Table 9 shows the yields of carbon (TTUC), with TTGC = S TTUC and TTG02 =
S TTU0, the acidities measured per assay with soda, the carbon and oxygen balances.
Table 10 shows the carbon selectivities.
The conversion of the propane is generally considered as illustrating the
catalyst activity: the greater this conversion, the more active the catalyst is. This
conversion is given per TTG of carbon (TTGc = S TTUc).
It is noted that the conversion to propane is greater than 15 % for the catalysts
precalcinated at 273°C at flow rates of 10, 30 or 50 ml/min/g of catalyst, at 300°C and
320°C at low flow rates and at 350°C at a no flow rate. It is also at these values that
the highest acrylic acid yields (greater than 10%) and the greatest selectivities and the
greatest acidities (greater than 3000 ppm) are obtained.
Generally, the TTG of oxygen (TTG02) is also considered. As long as this TTG
remains below 60 %, it is considered that there is still enough oxygen which can serve
to oxidize the propane. In this case, the maximum oxygen conversion capacities of the
catalyst have not been achieved. The reaction temperature can be raised in order to
improve the conversion to oxygen. However it is preferable to prevent the oxygen
conversion from exceeding 80 %.
The set of results relating to the selectivity and the yield of acetic acid is
satisfactory.
It is thus noted that very good catalytic performances are obtained with several
catalysts which have undergone very different precalcination conditions:
- at 273°C under flow rates of air of 10, 30 and 50 ml/min/g of catalyst;
- at 300 and 320°C under flow rates of air of 10 ml/min/g of catalyst; and
- 350°C under no air flow rate.
Example 10
Preparation of a catalyst E
Catalyst E was prepared with the formula: MoV0.33Te0.23Nb0.11Si1Ox
with the precursor: MoV0.33Te0.23Nb0.11Si1(Oxalate)0.33(NH4)1.19Ox
in the manner given in Example 8 carrying out a precalcination at 319°C, under static
air.
The drying which precedes the precalcination however has not been carried
out in the oven but using microwaves.
Example 11
Comparison of catalyst E and catalyst B2
Catalysts B and B2 were tested at 6 different temperatures, from 380°C to
430°C. The results obtained are recorded in Tables 11 and 12 below.
It is noted that the behaviours are similar for these two catalysts. Therefore
there is no difference a priori between drying with microwaves and drying in the
oven.
The yield of acrylic acid and the acidity are greater as the reaction temperature
increases. These results show that the maximum yield of acrylic acid is reached at
420°C.
WE CLAIM:
1. Method for the production of acrylic acid from propane, in which a
gaseous mixture comprising propane, molecular oxygen, water vapour, as well
as an inert gas is passed over a catalyst with the formula (1):
Mo1VaTebNbcSidOx (I)
in which:
- a is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- b is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive;
- d is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive; and
- x is the quantity of oxygen bound to the other elements and depends on their
oxidation state,
in order to oxidize the propane to acrylic acid, characterized in that the molar ratio
propane/molecular oxygen in the initial gaseous mixture is greater than or equal to
0.5.
2. Method as claimed in claim 1, in which the molar proportions of the
constituents of the initial gaseous mixture are as follows:
propane/O2/inert gas/H2O (vapour) = 1/0.05-2/1-10/1-10;
and preferably 1/0.1-1/1-5/1-5.
3. Method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, in which the catalyst of formula
(I):
- a is comprised between 0.09 and 0.8, inclusive;
- b is comprised between 0.04 and 0.6, inclusive;
- c is comprised between 0.01 and 0.4, inclusive; and
- d is comprised between 0.4 and 1.6, inclusive.
4. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the oxidation reactions
are carried out at a temperature of 200 to 500°C.
5. Method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the oxidation reaction is carried out
at a temperature of 250 to 450°C.
6. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the oxidation
reactions are carried out at a pressure of 1.01x104 to 1.01xl06 Pa (0.1 to 10
atmospheres).
7 Method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the oxidation reactions are
carried out at a pressure of 5.05xl04 to 5.05xl05 Pa (0.5-5 atmospheres).
8. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 7, wherein it is used until
there is a reduction ratio of the catalyst comprised between 0.1 and 10 g of oxygen per
kg of catalyst.
9. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 8, wherein once the
catalyst haa at least partially changed to the reduced state, its regeneration is carried
out according to reaction (3):
SOLIDreduced + O2 ? SOLIDoxidized (3)
by heating in the presence of oxygen or a gas containing oxygen at a temperature of
250 to 500 C, for a period necessary for the reoxidation of the catalyst.
10. Method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the oxidation and the
regeneration (3) reactions are carried out in a device with two stages, namely a reactor
and a regenerator which operate simultaneously and in which two catalyst loads
alternate periodically.
11. Method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the oxidation and the
regeneration (3) reactions are carried out in the same reactor alternating the periods of
reaction and regeneration.
12. Method as claimed in claim 9, wherein the oxidation and the
regeneration (3) reactions are carried out in a reactor with a moving bed.
13. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 7, in which:
a) the initial gaseous mixture is introduced into a first reactor with a
moving catalyst bed,
b) at the outlet of the first reactor, the gases are separated from the catalyst;
c) the catalyst is returned into a regenerator;
d) the gases are introduced into a second reactor with a moving catalyst
bed;
e) at the outlet of the second reactor, the gases are separated from the
catalyst and the acrylic acid contained in the separated gases is
recovered;
f) the catalyst is returned into the regenerator; and
g) the regenerated catalyst from the regenerator is reintroduced into the first
and second reactors.
14. Method as claimed in claim 13, in which the first and second reactors are
vertical and the catalyst is moved upwards by the gas flow.
15. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the oxidation
reactions are carried out with a residence time of 0.01 to 90 seconds in each reactor.
16. Method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the oxidation reactions are
carried out with a residence time of 0.1 to 30 seconds in each reactor.
17. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the propylene
produced and/or the propane which has not reacted are recycled to the inlet of the
reactor, or if there are several reactors, to the inlet of the first reactor.
18. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 17, in which the reactor, or when there
are several reactors, at least one of the reactors, also comprises a cocatalyst
corresponding to the following formula (II):
in which:
- a' is comprised between 0.006 and 1, inclusive
- b' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- c' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- d' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- e' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- f is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- g' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- h' is comprised between 0 and 3.5, inclusive;
- i' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- j' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- k' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- l' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive;
- m' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive; and
- n' is comprised between 0 and 1, inclusive.
19. Method as claimed in claim 18, in which the catalyst is regenerated and
circulates, if appropriate, in the same way as the catalyst.
20. Method as claimed in claim 18 or claim 19, in which the cocatalyst of
formula (II):
- a' is comprised between 0.01 and 0.4, inclusive;
- b' is comprised between 0.2 and 1.6, inclusive;
- c' is comprised between 0.3 and 1.6, inclusive;
- d' is comprised between 0.1 and 0.6, inclusive;
- e' is comprised between 0.006 and 0.01, inclusive;
- f' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- g' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- h' is comprised between 0.01 and 1.6, inclusive
- i' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- j' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- k' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
-l' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive;
- m' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive; and
- n' is comprised between 0 and 0.4, inclusive.
21. Method as claimed in one of claims 18 to 20, in which a weight ratio of the
catalyst to the cocatalyst greater than 0.5 and preferably of at least 1 is used.
22. Method as claimed in one of claims 18 to 21, in which the catalyst and the
cocatalyst are mixed.
23. Method as claimed in one of claims 18 to 21, in which the catalyst and the
cocatalyst are present in the form of pellets, each pellet comprising both the catalyst
and the cocatalyst.
24. Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 23, comprising the repetition, in a
reactor provided with the catalyst of formula (I) defined in claim 1, and if appropriate,
the cocatalyst of formula (II) defined in claim 18, of the cycle comprising the
following successive stages:
1) a stage of injection of the gaseous mixture as defined in claims 1 to 3;
2) a stage of injection of water vapour and, if appropriate, inert gas;
3) a stage of injection of a mixture of molecular oxygen, water vapour and, if
appropriate, inert gas; and
4) a stage of injection of water vapour and, if appropriate, inert gas.
25. Method as claimed in claim 24, wherein the cycle comprises an
additional stage which precedes or follows stage 1) and during which a gaseous
mixture corresponding to that of stage 1) but without molecular oxygen is injected,
the molar ratio propane/molecular oxygen then being calculated globally for stage 1)
and this additional stage.
26. Method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the additional stage
precedes stage I) in the cycle.
27. Method as claimed in one of claims 24 to 26, wherein the reactor is a
reactor with a moving bed.
The invention concerns the production of acrylic acid from
propane in the presence of molecular oxygen. Said method consists in passing
a gas mixture comprising propane, molecular oxygen, water vapour and,
optionally, an inert gas, on a catalyst of formula (I) Mo1VaTebNbcSidOx to oxidize propane into acrylic acid, the propane/molecular
oxygen mol ratio in the initial gas mixture being not less than 0.5.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 378-KOLNP-2005-20-01-2023-ALL DOCUMENTS.pdf 2023-01-20
1 378-kolnp-2005-granted-specification.pdf 2011-10-06
2 00378-kolnp-2005 abstract-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
2 378-kolnp-2005-granted-reply to examination report.pdf 2011-10-06
3 378-kolnp-2005-granted-letter patent.pdf 2011-10-06
3 00378-kolnp-2005 abstract.pdf 2011-10-06
4 378-kolnp-2005-granted-gpa.pdf 2011-10-06
4 00378-kolnp-2005 assignment.pdf 2011-10-06
5 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 5.pdf 2011-10-06
5 00378-kolnp-2005 claims.pdf 2011-10-06
6 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 3.pdf 2011-10-06
6 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
7 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 18.pdf 2011-10-06
7 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.2.pdf 2011-10-06
8 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 1.pdf 2011-10-06
8 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.3.pdf 2011-10-06
9 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.4.pdf 2011-10-06
9 378-kolnp-2005-granted-examination report.pdf 2011-10-06
10 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence.pdf 2011-10-06
10 378-kolnp-2005-granted-drawings.pdf 2011-10-06
11 00378-kolnp-2005 description(complete).pdf 2011-10-06
11 378-kolnp-2005-granted-description (complete).pdf 2011-10-06
12 00378-kolnp-2005 drawings.pdf 2011-10-06
12 378-kolnp-2005-granted-correspondence.pdf 2011-10-06
13 00378-kolnp-2005 form-1.pdf 2011-10-06
13 378-kolnp-2005-granted-claims.pdf 2011-10-06
14 00378-kolnp-2005 form-18.pdf 2011-10-06
14 378-kolnp-2005-granted-assignment.pdf 2011-10-06
15 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
15 378-kolnp-2005-granted-abstract.pdf 2011-10-06
16 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3-1.2.pdf 2011-10-06
16 378-KOLNP-2005-FORM 27.pdf 2011-10-06
17 378-KOLNP-2005-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2011-10-06
17 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3.pdf 2011-10-06
18 00378-kolnp-2005 form-5.pdf 2011-10-06
18 00378-kolnp-2005 priority document.pdf 2011-10-06
19 00378-kolnp-2005 g.p.a.pdf 2011-10-06
19 00378-kolnp-2005 petition under rule 137.pdf 2011-10-06
20 00378-kolnp-2005 international publication.pdf 2011-10-06
20 00378-kolnp-2005 pct others.pdf 2011-10-06
21 00378-kolnp-2005 international publication_1-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
21 00378-kolnp-2005 international search authority report.pdf 2011-10-06
22 00378-kolnp-2005 international publication_1-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
22 00378-kolnp-2005 international search authority report.pdf 2011-10-06
23 00378-kolnp-2005 international publication.pdf 2011-10-06
23 00378-kolnp-2005 pct others.pdf 2011-10-06
24 00378-kolnp-2005 petition under rule 137.pdf 2011-10-06
24 00378-kolnp-2005 g.p.a.pdf 2011-10-06
25 00378-kolnp-2005 form-5.pdf 2011-10-06
25 00378-kolnp-2005 priority document.pdf 2011-10-06
26 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3.pdf 2011-10-06
26 378-KOLNP-2005-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2011-10-06
27 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3-1.2.pdf 2011-10-06
27 378-KOLNP-2005-FORM 27.pdf 2011-10-06
28 00378-kolnp-2005 form-3-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
28 378-kolnp-2005-granted-abstract.pdf 2011-10-06
29 00378-kolnp-2005 form-18.pdf 2011-10-06
29 378-kolnp-2005-granted-assignment.pdf 2011-10-06
30 00378-kolnp-2005 form-1.pdf 2011-10-06
30 378-kolnp-2005-granted-claims.pdf 2011-10-06
31 00378-kolnp-2005 drawings.pdf 2011-10-06
31 378-kolnp-2005-granted-correspondence.pdf 2011-10-06
32 00378-kolnp-2005 description(complete).pdf 2011-10-06
32 378-kolnp-2005-granted-description (complete).pdf 2011-10-06
33 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence.pdf 2011-10-06
33 378-kolnp-2005-granted-drawings.pdf 2011-10-06
34 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.4.pdf 2011-10-06
34 378-kolnp-2005-granted-examination report.pdf 2011-10-06
35 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.3.pdf 2011-10-06
35 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 1.pdf 2011-10-06
36 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 18.pdf 2011-10-06
36 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.2.pdf 2011-10-06
37 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 3.pdf 2011-10-06
37 00378-kolnp-2005 correspondence-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
38 378-kolnp-2005-granted-form 5.pdf 2011-10-06
38 00378-kolnp-2005 claims.pdf 2011-10-06
39 378-kolnp-2005-granted-gpa.pdf 2011-10-06
39 00378-kolnp-2005 assignment.pdf 2011-10-06
40 378-kolnp-2005-granted-letter patent.pdf 2011-10-06
40 00378-kolnp-2005 abstract.pdf 2011-10-06
41 378-kolnp-2005-granted-reply to examination report.pdf 2011-10-06
41 00378-kolnp-2005 abstract-1.1.pdf 2011-10-06
42 378-KOLNP-2005-20-01-2023-ALL DOCUMENTS.pdf 2023-01-20
42 378-kolnp-2005-granted-specification.pdf 2011-10-06

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 30 May 2008

From 09/09/2005 - To 09/09/2006

4th: 30 May 2008

From 09/09/2006 - To 09/09/2007

5th: 30 May 2008

From 09/09/2007 - To 09/09/2008

6th: 30 May 2008

From 09/09/2008 - To 09/09/2009