Abstract: This disclosure relates generally to improving wireless data rates, and more particularly to methods and systems for dynamic CoMP-link maintenance. In one embodiment, a system may identify a default coordinated multipoint set of neighboring base stations for a user equipment associated with a serving base station. The system may detect at least one of: a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment, and a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set. The system may also determine, after detecting at least one of the change in the data rate requirement and the stale coordinated multipoint link, whether to perform at least one coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure, including at least one of: a coordinated multipoint link handover, a coordinated multipoint link replacement, a coordinated multipoint link consolidation, or a coordinated multipoint scheme modification.
Claims:WE CLAIM:
1. A dynamic coordinated multipoint link maintenance system, comprising:
a hardware processor; and
a memory storing instructions executable by the hardware processor for:
identifying, via the hardware processor, a default coordinated multipoint set of neighboring base stations for a user equipment associated with a serving base station;
detecting, via the hardware processor, at least one of: a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment, and a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set;
determining, via the hardware processor, after detecting at least one of the change in the data rate requirement and the stale coordinated multipoint link, whether to perform at least one coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure, including at least one of:
a coordinated multipoint link handover,
a coordinated multipoint link replacement,
a coordinated multipoint link consolidation, or
a coordinated multipoint scheme modification; and
initiating, via the hardware processor, the at least one determined coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a number of currently active guaranteed bit-rate services for the user equipment is less than a number of previously active guaranteed bit-rate services for the user equipment.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a current usage for a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set differs from a previous usage for the coordinated multipoint link by an amount greater than a threshold value.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set has been inactive for greater than a threshold timer value.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a channel quality for a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set has reduced by greater than a threshold quality value.
6. The system of claim 1, the memory further storing instructions for:
calculating, via the hardware processor, a data rate for the user equipment;
determining, via the hardware processor, that the calculated data rate for the user equipment does not exceed a data rate threshold; and
initiating, via the hardware processor, at least one additional coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
7. The system of claim 1, the memory further storing instructions for:
generating, via the hardware processor, at least one updated default coordinated multipoint set of neighboring base stations for the user equipment, after determining whether to perform at least one coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
8. A method for dynamic coordinated multipoint link maintenance, comprising:
identifying, via a hardware processor, a default coordinated multipoint set of neighboring base stations for a user equipment associated with a serving base station;
detecting, via the hardware processor, at least one of: a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment, and a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set;
determining, via the hardware processor, after detecting at least one of the change in the data rate requirement and the stale coordinated multipoint link, whether to perform at least one coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure, including at least one of:
a coordinated multipoint link handover,
a coordinated multipoint link replacement,
a coordinated multipoint link consolidation, or
a coordinated multipoint scheme modification; and
initiating, via the hardware processor, the at least one determined coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a number of currently active guaranteed bit-rate services for the user equipment is less than a number of previously active guaranteed bit-rate services for the user equipment.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a change in a data rate requirement for the user equipment comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a current usage for a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set differs from a previous usage for the coordinated multipoint link by an amount greater than a threshold value.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set has been inactive for greater than a threshold timer value.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein detecting, via the hardware processor, a stale coordinated multipoint link for the user equipment to one of the neighboring stations in the default coordinated multipoint set comprises:
determining, via the hardware processor, whether a channel quality for a coordinated multipoint link to one of the neighboring base stations in the default coordinated multipoint set has reduced by greater than a threshold quality value.
13. The method of claim 8, the memory further storing instructions for:
calculating, via the hardware processor, a data rate for the user equipment;
determining, via the hardware processor, that the calculated data rate for the user equipment does not exceed a data rate threshold; and
initiating, via the hardware processor, at least one additional coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
14. The method of claim 8, the memory further storing instructions for:
generating, via the hardware processor, at least one updated default coordinated multipoint set of neighboring base stations for the user equipment, after determining whether to perform at least one coordinated multipoint link maintenance procedure.
Dated this 28th day of December, 2015
Swetha SN
Of K&S Partners
Agent for the Applicant
, Description:TECHNICAL FIELD
This disclosure relates generally to improving wireless data rates, and more particularly to methods and systems for dynamic coordinated multi point (CoMP) link maintenance.
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7008-CHE-2015-PROOF OF ALTERATION [11-09-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-09-11 |
| 1 | Form 9 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 2 | 7008-CHE-2015-IntimationOfGrant07-06-2023.pdf | 2023-06-07 |
| 2 | Form 5 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 3 | Form 3 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 3 | 7008-CHE-2015-PatentCertificate07-06-2023.pdf | 2023-06-07 |
| 4 | Form 18 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 4 | 7008-CHE-2015-ABSTRACT [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 5 | Drawing [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 5 | 7008-CHE-2015-CLAIMS [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 6 | Description(Complete) [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 6 | 7008-CHE-2015-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 7 | REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [30-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-30 |
| 7 | 7008-CHE-2015-CORRESPONDENCE [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 8 | REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [02-03-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-03-02 |
| 8 | 7008-CHE-2015-DRAWING [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 9 | 7008-CHE-2015-FER_SER_REPLY [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 9 | 7008-CHE-2015-Power of Attorney-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 10 | 7008-CHE-2015-Form 1-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 10 | 7008-CHE-2015-FORM 3 [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 11 | 7008-CHE-2015-Correspondence-F 1-PA-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 11 | 7008-CHE-2015-Information under section 8(2) [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 12 | 7008-CHE-2015-FER.pdf | 2019-08-23 |
| 12 | 7008-CHE-2015-OTHERS [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 13 | 7008-CHE-2015-FER.pdf | 2019-08-23 |
| 13 | 7008-CHE-2015-OTHERS [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 14 | 7008-CHE-2015-Correspondence-F 1-PA-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 14 | 7008-CHE-2015-Information under section 8(2) [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 15 | 7008-CHE-2015-Form 1-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 15 | 7008-CHE-2015-FORM 3 [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 16 | 7008-CHE-2015-FER_SER_REPLY [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 16 | 7008-CHE-2015-Power of Attorney-090516.pdf | 2016-07-15 |
| 17 | REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [02-03-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-03-02 |
| 17 | 7008-CHE-2015-DRAWING [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 18 | REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [30-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-30 |
| 18 | 7008-CHE-2015-CORRESPONDENCE [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 19 | Description(Complete) [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 19 | 7008-CHE-2015-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 20 | Drawing [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 20 | 7008-CHE-2015-CLAIMS [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 21 | Form 18 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 21 | 7008-CHE-2015-ABSTRACT [24-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-24 |
| 22 | Form 3 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 22 | 7008-CHE-2015-PatentCertificate07-06-2023.pdf | 2023-06-07 |
| 23 | Form 5 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 23 | 7008-CHE-2015-IntimationOfGrant07-06-2023.pdf | 2023-06-07 |
| 24 | Form 9 [28-12-2015(online)].pdf | 2015-12-28 |
| 24 | 7008-CHE-2015-PROOF OF ALTERATION [11-09-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-09-11 |
| 1 | search_21-08-2019.pdf |