Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Methods And Systems For Evaluating An Incident Ticket

Abstract: This disclosure relates generally to incident management, and more particularly to methods and systems for evaluating an incident ticket. In one embodiment, an incident evaluating device for evaluating an incident ticket is disclosed. The incident evaluating device comprises a processor and a memory communicatively coupled to the processor. The memory stores processor instructions, which, on execution, causes the processor to analyze data associated with the incident ticket. The processor determines completeness of incident resolution of the incident ticket based on the analysis and rates the incident ticket based on the completeness of the incident resolution. FIG. 1

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
05 November 2015
Publication Number
48/2015
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMPUTER SCIENCE
Status
Email
ipo@knspartners.com
Parent Application

Applicants

WIPRO LIMITED
Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore 560035, Karnataka, India.

Inventors

1. ARTHI VENKATARAMAN
47, Tennis House, 7'th Main, Egipura, Bangalore 560047, Karnataka, India
2. RAMKUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAN
Number 22, 1st Main 2nd Cross, Munnesewara Nagar, Bangalore 560061, Karnataka, India.

Specification

Claims:WE CLAIM
1. A method for evaluating an incident ticket, the method comprising:
analyzing, by an incident evaluating device, data associated with the incident ticket;
determining, by the incident evaluating device, completeness of incident resolution of the incident ticket based on the analysis; and
rating, by the incident evaluating device, the incident ticket based on the completeness of the incident resolution.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining user-agent interaction based on the analysis.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the user-agent interaction is determined based on at least one of an agent response coherence and a user response sentiment.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the agent response coherence is based on relevancy of an agent response to the incident ticket.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the user response sentiment is determined based on a user response to the incident ticket.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the completeness of the incident resolution comprises comparing the incident resolution with an expected incident resolution.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining timeliness of response based on the analysis.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the timeliness of response is based on at least one of time consumed in an incident-open state, time consumed in assigning an agent for the incident ticket, and time consumed in the incident resolution.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising categorizing the incident ticket based on the rating of the incident ticket.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising updating the evaluation of the incident ticket based on a user feedback on the categorization of the incident ticket.

11. An incident evaluating device for evaluating an incident ticket, the incident evaluating device comprising:
a processor; and
a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, wherein the memory stores processor instructions, which, on execution, causes the processor to:
analyze data associated with the incident ticket;
determine completeness of incident resolution of the incident ticket based on the analysis; and
rate the incident ticket based on the completeness of the incident resolution.

12. The incident evaluating device of claim 11, wherein the processor further determines user-agent interaction based on the analysis.

13. The incident evaluating device of claim 12, wherein the user-agent interaction is determined based on at least one of an agent response coherence and a user response sentiment.

14. The incident evaluating device of claim 13, wherein the agent response coherence is based on relevancy of an agent response to the incident ticket.

15. The incident evaluating device of claim 13, wherein the user response sentiment is determined based on a user response to the incident ticket.

16. The incident evaluating device of claim 11, wherein the processor further compares the incident resolution with an expected incident resolution to determine the completeness of the incident resolution.

17. The incident evaluating device of claim 11, wherein the processor further determines timeliness of response based on the analysis.

18. The incident evaluating device of claim 17, the timeliness of response is based on at least one of time consumed in an incident-open state, time consumed in assigning an agent for the incident ticket, and time consumed in the incident resolution.

19. The incident evaluating device of claim 11, wherein the processor further categorizes the incident ticket based on the rating of the incident ticket.

20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions for:
analyzing data associated with the incident ticket;
determining completeness of incident resolution of the incident ticket based on the analysis; and
rating the incident ticket based on the completeness of the incident resolution.

Dated this 5th day of November, 2015

Swetha S.N.
Of K&S Partners
Agent for the Applicant
, Description:TECHNICAL FIELD
This disclosure relates generally to incident management, and more particularly to methods and systems for evaluating an incident ticket.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 5992-CHE-2015-FER.pdf 2019-12-26
1 Form 9 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
2 Form 5 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
2 5992-CHE-2015-Correspondence-F1-PA-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
3 Form 3 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
3 5992-CHE-2015-Form 1-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
4 5992-CHE-2015-Power of Attorney-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
4 Form 18 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
5 Drawing [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
5 abstract 5992-CHE-2015.jpg 2015-11-23
6 Request For Certified Copy-Online.pdf 2015-11-13
6 Description(Complete) [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
7 REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY [06-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-06
8 Request For Certified Copy-Online.pdf 2015-11-13
8 Description(Complete) [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
9 Drawing [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
9 abstract 5992-CHE-2015.jpg 2015-11-23
10 5992-CHE-2015-Power of Attorney-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
10 Form 18 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
11 5992-CHE-2015-Form 1-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
11 Form 3 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
12 Form 5 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
12 5992-CHE-2015-Correspondence-F1-PA-290416.pdf 2016-07-13
13 Form 9 [05-11-2015(online)].pdf 2015-11-05
13 5992-CHE-2015-FER.pdf 2019-12-26

Search Strategy

1 2019-12-2017-33-04_20-12-2019.pdf