Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Non Homogeneous Positive Electrode Materials Combining High Safety And High Power In A Li Rechargeable Battery

Abstract: Fig.1 The invention relates to a Li»NixCoyMz 02±e Af composite oxide for use as a cathode material in a rechargeable battery, with a non-homogenous Ni/Al ratio in the particles, allowing excellent power and safety properties when used as positive electrode material in Li battery. More par-ticularly, in the formula 0.9 0.010 and z2 - zl > 0.010; xl and zl being the parameters corresponding to particles having a particle size D90; and x2 and z2 being the parameters correspond¬ing to particles having a particle size D10.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
12 August 2011
Publication Number
45/2012
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
ELECTRICAL
Status
Email
patents@dpahuja.com
Parent Application

Applicants

UMICORE
RUE DU MARAIS 31, B-1000 BRUSSELS

Inventors

1. LEVASSEUR, STEPHANE
RUE ANTOINE BREART 53, 1030 BRUSSELS
2. CARLACH, PHILIPPE
LOMBARDENVEST 63 BUS 6, 2000 ANTWERP
3. DE PALMA, RANDY
STROOIHEIDE 9, 3630 MAASMECHELEN
4. VAN THOURNOUT, MICHELE
FOURQUEPIRE 1, 7890 ELLEZELLES

Specification

Non-homogeneous positive electrode materials combining high safety and high power in a LI rechargeable battery,

The invention relates to a LiaNixCoyAlz02 composite oxide with a non-homogenous Ni/Al ratio in the particles, allowing excellent power and safety properties when used as positive electrode material in Li battery.

Due to their high energy density, rechargeable lithium and lithium-ion batteries can be used in a variety of portable electronics applications, such as cellular phones, laptop computers, digital cameras and video cameras. Commercially available lithium-ion batteries typically consist of graphite-based anode and LiCo02-based cathode materials.
However, LiCoQrbased cathode materials are expensive and typically have a relatively low capacity of approximately 150 mAh/g.

Alternatives to LiCoO2 based cathode materials include LiNiOrbased cathode materials, which are less expensive. Typical LiNi02-based cathode materials include compositions having a formula LiNi0.8Coz2O2. These materials are relatively more expensive than cobalt-free LiNi02-based cathode material due to the higher cost of cobalt relative to nickel, but are far easier to manufacture. Nevertheless, LiNiCoOr based cathode materials usually have a lower safety in the charged state compared to LiCo02-based cathode materials, because of the lower structural stability of LiNi02 type cathode materials.

A way to improve the safety has been to dope LiNiCo02 materials with inert elements such as Al, Mg, Ti, in order to stabilise the structure when heated in the charged state. A drawback to that major improvement regarding safety is the fact that inert element doping is detrimental for power and reversible capacity within the LiNiCo02 material. In order for this material to be industrially usable, manufacturers had to find a compromise between safety and performance, thus using the lowest amounts of Al, Ti and Mg required for obtaining a satisfying safety, while keeping decent power and capacity performances. Such products, like the LiNio.gCoo.15Alo.05O2 (also referred to as "NCA" product) or LiNio.7Co0.2Ti0.o5Mgo.o502 compositions for example, are nowadays commercialized by companies like TODA, Honjo-FMC and Nichia. However, as explained above, these products typically suffer from a difficult compromise between safety and electrochemical performances, thus resulting in medium level of overall performances.

With the appearance of new applications for large batteries on the market (e.g. for hybrid vehicles or stationary power devices) and a need for meeting high safety requirements, without compromising on power performances, it appears that a breakthrough is needed in the synthesis of these NiCo-based materials.

As there has always been a concern to manufacture materials that are as homogeneous as possible, the state of the art manufacturing process of LiaNixCOyMzOz (M=Al, Mn, Ti, Mg...) products uses doped precursors such as hydroxides (see for example in US6958139), carbonates, nitrates or oxides, that are sintered at temperatures above 600°C. Thus, the material is perfectly homogeneous in composition, and the resulting positive electrode material shows medium level of global performances. Considering fundamentals from solid state chemistry applied to battery materials, it is known that for LiCo02 material, smaller particle size gives better power performances (as discussed in Choi et al., J. Power Sources, 158 (2006) 1419). It is however also known that a smaller particle size gives lower safety, as safety characteristics are somewhat linked to surface area (see for example Jiang et al., Electroch. Acta, 49 (2004) 2661). It follows that for the LiNixCOyM202 system, where the presence of given amounts of Ni and M (M being e.g. Al) are focussed both on improving power behaviour and safety, a homogenous composition both for small and large particles leads to a compromise between power and safety performance, due to the unavoidable spread of particle size. Indeed, for the small particles in which safety behaviour is directly related to M content, a higher M concentration would be needed to achieve the same safety behaviour as for larger particles. On the other hand, the increase of the nickel content in the large particles could enhance the performances of the LiNixCOyMz02 system.

The present invention provides for a solution to this problem. It covers a lithium metal oxide powder for use as a cathode material in a rechargeable battery, having a general formula LiaNixCoy Mz 02±e Af, with
0.9 0.010 and z2 - z1 > 0.010;
x1 and z1 being the parameters corresponding to particles having a particle size D90; and x2 and z2 being the parameters corresponding to particles having a particle size
D10. For the corresponding Co contents preferably the absolute value of (y1-y2) is less than 0.010, or even y1=y2=y.

Preferably both x1 - x2 > 0.030 and z2 - z1 > 0.030; and more preferably both x1 - x2 > 0.050 and z2 - z1 > 0.050.

In another preferred embodiment, the Ni content of said powder increases with increasing particle size, and the M content of said powder decreases with increasing particle size.

In preferred oxide powders M consists of Al. In another embodiment A consists of either one or both of S and C with f<0.02. Also preferred is an embodiment where A consists of C, with f<0.01. One embodiment consists of an oxide powder having a general formula LiaNio.soCoo.15Alo.05Co.01O2.

It should be mentioned here that WO20Q5/064715 describes a cathode active material comprising a lithium transition metal oxide LiaMt,02, with M=A2A'zM'i.z.z-, M' being MnxNiyCoi.x.y, A=Al, Mg or Ti and A' being a further dopant, where 0 0 or Abs(s)>0.1, preferably > 0.4, and more preferably > 0.6; and/or Abs(u) > 0.05, preferably > 0.4, and more preferably > 0.6.

In a preferred embodiment, Ni and Al should be homogeneously dispersed within each single particle in order to avoid mechanical stresses while intercalating/deintercalating Li when using the powder in a rechargeable battery.

In another embodiment, the use of a LiaNixCoyMz02Af material with a non-homogenous Ni/Al ratio in its particles in the manufacture of a lithium insertion-type electrode, is disclosed, by mixing said powder with a conductive carbon-bearing additive. The corresponding electrode mixture is also claimed.

The invention is illustrated by the following figures:

Fig. 1: SEM picture of the material according to the invention showing spherical particles of different sizes.

Fig. 2: variation of the Hi and Al content (in mol%) as a function of particle size measured by EDS in the material according to the invention. This measurement clearly shows that the Ni/Al ratio varies continuously with particle size.

Fig. 3: Ni, Co and Al mapping by EDS on cross-sections of particles of the material according to the invention. This measure clearly shows homogeneous repartition of the species within a single particle.

Fig. 4: Galvanostatic discharge curve of the material of the invention at different rates (C/10 (right), C (middle) and 2C (left)). This shows the excellent capacity and power properties of this material.

Fig.5: SEM picture of the state of the art material showing spherical particles of different sizes.

Fig. 6: variation of the Ni and Al content (in mol%) as a function of particle size measured by EDS in the state of the art material. This measurement clearly shows that the Ni/Al ratio is constant whatever the particle size.

Fig. 7: Galvanostatic discharge curve of the state of the art material at different rates (C/10 (right), C (middle) and 2C (left)). This shows the low capacity and power properties of the state of the art material.

The invention is further illustrated in the following examples:

Example 1:

In a first step, a NCA hydroxide precursor with molar composition 77.5:15:7.5 (Ni+Al=85) is precipitated from Ni, Co and Al sulphates in the presence of NaOH and Ammonia. The obtained NCA hydroxide has a spherical shape and the average particle size as measured from laser granulometry is centered around D50=3.9um (D10=0.6um, D90=6.5um). The NCA hydroxide also contains 2.31%wt of sulphate.

In a second step, a NCA hydroxide precursor with molar composition 80:15:5 (Ni+Al=85) is precipitated from Ni, Co and Al sulphates in the presence of NaOH and Ammonia. The obtained NCA hydroxide shows spherical shape and the average particle size as measured from laser granulometry is centered around D50=6.3um (D10=3.9um, D90=8.9um). The NCA hydroxide also contains 1.95%wt of sulphate.

In a third step, a NCA hydroxide precursor with molar composition 82:15:3 (Ni+Al=85) is precipitated from Ni, Co and Al sulphates in the presence of NaOH and Ammonia. The 15 obtained NCA hydroxide shows spherical shape and the average particle size as measured from laser granulometry is centered around D50=9.4um. (D10=6.8um, D90=12.8um). The NCA hydroxide also contains 1.77%wt of sulphate.

In a last step, the three hydroxide precursor powders as synthesised above are mixed in the ratio 0.3:0.3:0.4 and mixed with LiOH such that Li/(Ni+Co+Al)=1.02. The mixture is then heated in a tubular furnace under an oxygen flow at 750*C for 20h. The global composition of the obtained LiaNixCoyAlz02Af powder as deduced from ICP AES is Ni:Co:Al 80:15:5. Due to the presence of sulphate in the three precursors, the powder obtained contains sulphur of about 0.7%wt. In addition to the hydroxide precursors, the LiOH also contains some Li2C03 which leads to a powder containing about 0.15%wt of carbon. The global composition of the powder can thus be written as LiaNixCoyAlz02Af with for this example A representing the mixture S1.0C0.5 and f being equal to about 0.02.

The particle size distribution of the product after firing is measured by laser diffraction granulometry and shows a psd with D10=1.5 μm, D50=7.6μm, D90=20.2μm.

A FEG-SEM and EDS analysis is performed on the LiaNixCoyAlz02Af material made according to Examplel (see Ffg.1). The EDS analysis performed on various particles clearly shows that the chemical composition (Ni/Co/Al) of the final product is varying as a function of its particle size (see Table 1a & Fig.2).

Table 1a: Composition according to particle size

It can be concluded that the values for D10 and D90 should be as in Table 1b:

Table 1b:

As can be deduced from Fig.2, there is a very good correlation between Ni (and Al) content (%mol) with particle size as measured from SEM picture (D), the linear trend (%mol Ni = s . D + t1 and %mol Al = u . D +12) being:

- for Ni: Ni (mot) = 0.71 . D + 73.5

- for Al: Al (%mol) = -0.71 . D + 11.4.

Moreover, EDS analysis on cross section of a single particle (see Fig.3) clearly shows that the Ni/Co/Al distribution within a particle is fully homogeneous, with no composition gradient. This allows for optimized electrochemical performances by minimizing the stresses that could occur upon cycling during Li deintercalation /intercalation.

The XRD pattern shows a single phase material corresponding to NCA with FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) deduced from XRD profile refinement by Futlprof program for (003) and (110) lines equal to 0.1003 and 0.1314 resp. (in "26). As expected, despite the high synthesis temperature, the broad XRD lines suggest the coexistence of several slight deviations from the global composition due to the fact that particles with slightly different composition coexist within the powder. The hexagonal cell parameters as calculated from XRD (full pattern matching refinement) are a=2.846(2)A and =14.174(8)A.

A slurry is prepared by mixing the NCA powder of Example 1 with 5%wt carbon black and 5% PVDF into N-Methyl Pyrrolidone (NMP), and is deposited on an Al foil as current collector. The obtained electrode containing 90%wt active material is used to manufacture coin cells with Hmg/cm2 active material. The negative electrodes are made of metallic Li. The coin cells are cycled in LiPF6 based electrolyte between 3.0 and 4.3V vs Li+/Li. Fig. 4 shows that a high reversible capacity is obtained upon cycling with a reversible capacity of 186mAh/g at a discharge rate of C/10 (full discharge in 10h). 90% of the capacity is retained at a discharge rate of C (full discharge in 1h) with 167mAh/g, and 86% is obtained at a discharge rate of 2C (full discharge in 1 /2h) with 160mAh/g.
To measure the safety of the material, DSC (differential Scanning Calorimetry) measurements are performed on unwashed charged positive electrodes (4.1V/U+ after charging at C/2 in galvanostatic mode + Constant Current for 1h) using a NETZSCH 20 calorimeter with a heating ramp of 5X/min from Room Temperature to 350* C. The total energy released by the exothermic decomposition of the electrode material upon heating is 1000J/g.

Example 2 (Counter Example):

In first step, a NCA hydroxide material with molar composition 80:15:5 is precipitated from Ni, Co and Al sulphates in the presence of NaOH and Ammonia. The average particle size as measured from laser granulometry is centered around D50=6.1um (D10=3.1pm, D90=10.0um). The NCA hydroxide also contains 1.80wt% of sulphate.
In a second step, the hydroxide is mixed with LiOH such that Li/(Ni+Co+Al)=1.02. The mixture is then heated in a tubular furnace under oxygen flow at 750 °C for 20h. The composition of the obtained LiaNixCoyAlz02Af powder as deduced from ICP AES is Ni:Co:Al 80:15:5. Due to the presence of sulphate in the precursor, the powder obtained contains sulphur of about 0.6%wt. In addition to the hydroxide precursors, the LiOH also contains some Li2C03 which leads to a powder containing about 0.38%wt of carbon. The global composition of the powder can thus be written as LiaNixCoyAlz02Af with for this example A representing the mixture S 0.sC1. 2 and f being equal to about 0.027.

The particle size distribution from the product after firing is measured by laser diffraction granulometry and gives a psd with D10=1.4um, D50=7.4um, D90=18.1um which is considered to be equivalent to that of the product of Example 1. The EDS analysis performed on the product of the counterexample shows that the composition does not vary substantially with the particle size (see Fig.5 St Table 2).

Table 2: Composition according to particle size

As can be deduced from Fig. 6, there is a no correlation between Ni and Al content (%mol) and particle size as measured from the SEM picture (D). Indeed the calculated trends are:

- for Ni: Ni(%mol) = -0.07 . D + 80.5

- for Al: Al (%mol) = 0.03 . D + 4.9

The a and b factor in the equations (%mol = s (or u). D + t1 (or t2» being close to 0 confirms that the Ni and Al contents are constant in the powder.

The XRD pattern show a single phase material corresponding to NCA with FWHM deduced from XRD profile refinement by Fullprof program for (003) and (110) lines equal to 0.082 and 0.1081 resp. (in "26). As expected, and in contrast with Example 1, the narrow XRD lines are typical for a product synthetised at high temperature, and suggest that the Ni, Co and Al elements are homogeneously distributed within the powder. The hexagonal cell parameters as calculated from the XRD are a=2.844(1 )A and c=14.172(4)A. These are considered to be equivalent to those from the product obtained in Example 1 - the difference being within the error margin of the cell parameter refinement.

A slurry is prepared by mixing the NCA powder obtained according to Example 2 with 5%wt carbon black and 5% PVDF into N-Methyl Pyrrolidone (NMP), and is deposited on an Al foil as current collector. The obtained electrode containing 90%wt active material is used to manufacture coin cells, with 14mg/cm2 active material. The negative electrodes are made of metallic Li. The coin cells are cycled in LiPF6 based electrolyte between 3.0 and 4.3V vs Li+/Li. Fig. 7 shows that the reversible capacity obtained upon cycling has a reversible capacity of only 176mAh/g at a discharge rate of C/10. Only 87% of the capacity is retained at a discharge rate of C with 154mAh/g, and 83% is obtained at a discharge rate of 2C with 146mAh/g, i.e. 10% less capacity at high rate than the product according to the invention. This clearly emphasizes the benefit of the invention compared to state of the art materials regarding power properties of NCA materials.

DSC measurements were performed on unwashed charged positive electrodes (4.1V/Li+ after charging at C/2 in galvanostatic mode + Constant Current for 1h) using a NETZSCH calorimeter with a heating ramp of 5°C/min from RT to 350CC. The total energy released by the exothermic decomposition of the electrode material upon heating is 1200J/g, which is 20% higher than that of the material according to the invention. This clearly emphasizes the benefit of the invention compared to state of the art materials regarding safety properties of NCA materials.

Claims

1. A lithium metal oxide powder for use as a cathode material in a rechargeable battery, having a general formula LiaNixCOyM202±eAf, with
0.9 0.010 and
z2-z1 > 0.010;
x1 and z1 being the parameters corresponding to particles having a particle size D90; and x2 and z2 being the parameters corresponding to particles having a particle size D10.

2. The oxide powder of claim 1, characterized in that both x1 - x2 > 0.030 and z2 z1 > 0.030; and preferably both x1 - x2 > 0.050 and z2 - zl > 0.050.

3. The oxide powder of claims 1 or 2, characterized in that the Ni content of said powder increases with increasing particle size, and the M content of said powder decreases with increasing particle size.

4. The oxide powder of any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that A consists of S and C, with f<0.02, and M consists of Al.

5. The oxide powder of any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that A consists of C, with f<0.01, and M consists of Al.

6. The oxide powder of claim 5 having a general formula LiaNio.soCoo.15Alo.05Co.01O2.

7. Use of a powder according to any one of claims 1 to 6 in a Li secondary battery.

8. Process for the manufacture of a powder according to any one of claims 1 to 6, comprising the steps of:

- providing for at least two LiaNixCOyMz02±eAf precursor powders having a different particle size distribution characterized by different D10 and D90 values, and wherein a powder having a lower D10 and D90 value has a lower Ni content and a higher M content than a powder having a higher D10 and D90 value,

- mixing said at least two precursor powders together with a lithium precursor, preferably lithium hydroxide,

- heating said mixture at a temperature of at least 600"C

9. Process according to claim 8, wherein said precursor powders are hydroxide or
oxyhydroxide compositions obtained by precipitating metal sulphates, nitrates, chlorides or carbonates in the presence of an alkali hydroxide and a chelating agent, preferably ammonia.

10. Process according to claims 8 or 9, wherein the Co content of said precursor powders are identical.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDDENCE OTHERS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
1 5851-CHENP-2011-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2017-12-14
2 5851-CHENP-2011-FER.pdf 2017-05-16
2 5851-CHENP-2011 PCT 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
3 5851-CHENP-2011-Form-13-120811.pdf 2016-11-29
3 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-5 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
4 abstract5851-CHENP-2011.jpg 2012-09-17
4 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-3 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
5 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-2 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
5 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 16-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-16
6 5851-CHENP-2011 POWER OF ATTORNEY 16-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-16
6 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-13 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
7 5851-CHENP-2011 POWER OF ATTORNEY 10-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-10
7 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-1 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
8 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 10-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-10
8 5851-CHENP-2011 DRAWINGS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
9 5851-CHENP-2011 DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE) 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
9 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 13-02-2012.pdf 2012-02-13
10 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-3 13-02-2012.pdf 2012-02-13
10 5851-CHENP-2011 CLAIMS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
11 5851-CHENP-2011 ABSTRACT 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
11 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 03-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-03
12 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-18 03-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-03
13 5851-CHENP-2011 ABSTRACT 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
13 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 03-10-2011.pdf 2011-10-03
14 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-3 13-02-2012.pdf 2012-02-13
14 5851-CHENP-2011 CLAIMS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
15 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 13-02-2012.pdf 2012-02-13
15 5851-CHENP-2011 DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE) 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
16 5851-CHENP-2011 DRAWINGS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
16 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 10-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-10
17 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-1 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
17 5851-CHENP-2011 POWER OF ATTORNEY 10-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-10
18 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-13 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
18 5851-CHENP-2011 POWER OF ATTORNEY 16-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-16
19 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 16-04-2012.pdf 2012-04-16
19 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-2 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
20 abstract5851-CHENP-2011.jpg 2012-09-17
20 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-3 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
21 5851-CHENP-2011-Form-13-120811.pdf 2016-11-29
21 5851-CHENP-2011 FORM-5 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
22 5851-CHENP-2011-FER.pdf 2017-05-16
22 5851-CHENP-2011 PCT 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12
23 5851-CHENP-2011-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2017-12-14
23 5851-CHENP-2011 CORRESPONDDENCE OTHERS 12-08-2011.pdf 2011-08-12

Search Strategy

1 SearchStrategy_16-05-2017.pdf