Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Nonionic Associative Thickeners Containing Cyclohexylol Alkyls Formulations Containing Same And Uses Thereof

Abstract: The invention relates to novel associative thickeners of the hydrophobically modified ethylene oxide urethane (HEUR) type of which the hydrophobic monomer is based on cyclohexylol alkyls. It is these novel polyurethanes that allow the liberal thickening of an aqueous formulation at a medium shear gradient while limiting the increase in the viscosity at a low shear gradient. The invention also relates to compositions containing said thickeners and to the uses thereof in different formulations such as water based paints.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
11 November 2013
Publication Number
41/2014
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
POLYMER TECHNOLOGY
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2019-06-14
Renewal Date

Applicants

COATEX
35 rue Ampère F 69730 Genay France

Inventors

1. SUAU Jean Marc
60 Chemin Perrault F 69480 Lucenay France.
2. RUHLMANN Denis
307 Impasse des Griottes Le Clos des Cerisiers F 69730 Genay

Specification

FORM 2
THE PATENT ACT 1970 (39 of 1970)
&
The Patents Rules, 2003 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
(See Section 10, and rule 13)
1. TITLE OF INVENTION
NONIONIC ASSOCIATIVE THICKENERS CONTAINING CYCLOHEXYLOL ALKYLS, FORMULATIONS CONTAINING SAME AND USES THEREOF
2. APPLICANT(S)
a) Name : COATEX
b) Nationality : FRENCH Company
c) Address : 35, RUE AMPERE,
F-6973 0 GENAY, FRANCE
3. PREAMBLE TO THE DESCRIPTION
The following specification particularly describes the invention and the manner in which it is to be performed : -

The present invention concerns new associative thickeners belonging to the HEUR (Hydrophobically modified Ethylene oxide URethane) category. Used in aqueous formulations, they enable an increase in the average shear gradient viscosity while limiting the increase in low shear gradient viscosity. Such a compromise results in particular from the use of original groups based on alkyl cyclohexylols to manufacture the associative monomers of these thickeners.
Aqueous paint formulations containing mineral fillers consist of an aqueous phase, of one or more polymers in emulsion in the liquid phase referred to as binders, fillers and/or pigments, a dispersant and admixtures as diverse as surfactants, coalescent agents, biocides, and anti-foaming agents, and finally, at least one thickening agent.
The latter allows a control of the rheology of aqueous formulations in which it is introduced, and in particular in aqueous paints, both at the manufacturing stage as well as during their transport, storage, or in the course of their implementation. The diversity of practical constraints at the level of each of these steps reflects a multiplicity of different rheological behaviours.
One can nevertheless summarize the need of the person skilled in the art to obtain a thickening effect in the aqueous formulation, both for reasons of stability over time as well as for a possible application of paint to a vertical surface, the absence of coating splash at the time of implementation, etc. This is why the additives which contribute to this control of rheological behaviour are known as thickeners.
Among these products, there are the so-called "associative" thickeners which are water-soluble polymers with insoluble hydrophobic groups. Such macro-molecules have an associative character: once introduced into water, the hydrophobic groups are susceptible to association in the form of micellar aggregates. These aggregates are linked to one another by the hydrophilic parts of the polymers: there is then the formation of a three-dimensional network that causes the increase in the viscosity of the medium.

The operating mechanism and characteristics of associative thickeners are well known today and are described for example in the documents "Rheology modifiers for water-borne paints" (Surface Coatings Australia, 1985, pp. 6-10) and "Rheological modifiers for water-based paints: the most flexible tools for your formulations" (Eurocoat 97, UATCM, vol. 1, pp 423-442).
Among these associative thickeners, there is the class of associative thickeners of the HEUR (Hydrophobically modified Ethylene oxide URethane) type. They designate copolymers resulting from the synthesis between a compound of the polyalkylene glycol type, a polyisocyanate and a monomer or condensate called "associative" of the alkyl, aryl or aryalkyl type consisting of a hydrophobic terminal group.
These structures are well known for developing high viscosities for an average to low shear gradient (j. of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 58, p 209-230,1995; Polymeric Mat. Sci. and Engineering, vol. 59, p 1033,1988; Polymeric Mat. Sci. and Engineering, vol. 61, p 533,1989; Polymeric Paint Colour Journal, vol. 176, No. 4169, p 459, June 1986), which corresponds respectively to Stormer™ (KU) and Brookfield™ (mPa.s). measurements of viscosity.
But it is a more complex rheology that we are seeking, a real compromise between the application properties of the paint and its behaviour in the can. On the one hand, we aim to increase the Stormer™ viscosity of the formulation: this results in a better stability of the paint in storage and an improved performance when the product is agitated (appearance in the can) and is picked up with the application tool (better loading of the roller, paintbrush or brush). On the other hand, the increase in the Brookfield™ viscosity must be limited in a concomitant manner: such an increase results in a degradation of the application properties of the paint (limitation of levelling, presence of coating splashes).
To this double problem, the associative polyurethane thickeners market provided a solution in the 1990s which constitutes a reference: Acrysol™ SCT-275 (DOW™).

However, this product contains alkyl phenols. Now these substances are today widely suspected of being carcinogenic and dangerous to reproduction. Still tolerated in the paint industry, they nonetheless remain of interest to legislative institutions, particularly those of Europe.
There is therefore a real need to develop an associative thickener of the HEUR type in order to resolve the double technical problem referred to above without using alkyl phenols. In order to do so, the person skilled in the art has a very broad library of structures that differ essentially in the choice of the hydrophobic monomer.
Document EP 1 566 393 describes a HEUR type thickener, one of the essential characteristic of which is the presence of n-butyl-1-octanol, while its hydrophobic groups are based on fatty alcohols with 8 to 18 carbon atoms. Document DE 10 206 023001 describes an associative non-ionic thickening agent of the HEUR type including a branched linear alcohol. Document EP 1241198 describes polyurethane-based thickening agents including a monoalcohol having 6 to 22 carbon atoms. Document EP 1 013 264 describes a polyurethane thickener for cosmetic formulations with an associative monomer functionalized by a hydrophobic group that can be linear or branched, but preferentially linear and possessing 12 to 24 carbon atoms. Document WO 94/06840 proposes an associative thickener of the HEUR type characterized by a certain density of hydrophobic groups, the said groups being linear alkyl chains with 8 to 22 carbon atoms. Document EP 1 584 331 proposes a hydrophobic terminal group with 6 to 34 carbon atoms for the associative monomer. To specifically increase the Brookfield™ viscosity, document EP 0 639 595 proposes linear hydrophobic groups having 4 to 36 carbon atoms. Document WO 02/102868 also makes reference to linear structures for the associative monomer.
However, outside of the alkyl phenols, none of the hydrophobic structures envisaged until now provides satisfaction for increasing the Stormer™ viscosity while limiting the increase in the Brookfield™ viscosity, and thus achieving an

optimal compromise between stability on the one hand, the can appearance, the tool loading, and on the other hand the application properties such as levelling and the absence of coating splash.
Continuing her research in this regard, the Applicant found quite surprisingly that the use of certain structures instead of the hydrophobic monomer led to a better compromise between a significant Stormer™ viscosity and an attenuated Brookfield™ viscosity, and this for a number of carbon atoms that was identical or close to the linear alkyl structures of the prior art.
This technological advance is based on the use, as a hydrophobic monomer, of a compound whose structure corresponds to formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group with 10 to 15 carbon atoms. Such compounds have been identified as surfactants and are obtained by hydrogenation of an alkyl phenol. In particular, reference can be made to document US 6 111 146 which describes their synthesis. The resulting compounds are referred by the expression "alkyl cyclohexylols." It is important to add that the final structure is not that of an alkyl phenol, and that the resulting product will not be categorized as such.
These structures are therefore used to manufacture water-soluble polyurethanes resulting from the condensation:
a) of at least one monomer with the formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group with 10 to 15 carbon atoms, preferentially 12 carbon atoms,
b) of at least one polyalkylene glycol, and
c) of at least one polyisocyanate.
It is these new polyurethanes that, for example, allow a thickening of a medium shear gradient paint formulation while limiting this increase at a lower gradient, such a comparative being realised with linear alkyl structures of the prior art with a very similar number of carbon atoms. With the thickeners according to the invention, we even managed to exceed the performances of Acrysol™ SCT-275.
Also, a first object of the present invention consists of water-soluble polyurethanes resulting from the condensation:
a) of at least one monomer with the formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group with 10 to 15 carbon atoms, preferentially 12 carbon atoms,
b) of at least one polyalkylene glycol and,
c) of at least one polyisocyanate.
"Polyurethane" is understood to mean a urethane polymer, i.e. a compound produced by the reaction between an isocyanate and an alcohol.
According to the invention, the term "alkyl" designates a linear or branched hydrocarbon radical with 10 to 15 carbon atoms, such as decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl or pentadecyl.

"Polyalkylene glycol" is understood to mean a polymer of an alkylene glycol derived from an olefinic oxide. The polyalkylene glycol according to the present invention is, for example, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, polybutylene glycol or a polyalkylene glycol containing a proportion of an ethylene-oxy group and/or a proportion of a propylene-oxy group and/or a proportion of a butylene-oxy group. The polyalkylene glycol according to the present invention can, for example, include a dominant proportion of an ethylene-oxy group in association with a secondary proportion of a propylene-oxy group. Specific examples of alkylene glycol polymers include: polyalkylene glycols having an average molecular weight of 1,000, 4,000, 6,000,10,000 and 20,000 g/mol (in the case of polyethylene glycol called PEG-1000, PEG-4000, PEG-6000, PEG 10000 and PEG 20000); polyethylene polypropylene glycols having a percentage of ethylene oxide of between 20 and 80% by weight and a percentage of propylene oxide of between 20 and 80% by weight.
"Polyisocyanate" is understood to mean a compound which includes at least 2 functional isocyanate groups -N=C=0.
According to one aspect of the present invention, the monomer of formula (I) has the following formula (II):

where R designates an alkyl group as defined above, i.e. having 10 to 15 carbon atoms, and preferably 12 carbon atoms.
According to another aspect of the present invention, monomer a) has a formula (I) or (II) where R designates a group having 12 carbon atoms.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, monomer a) has a formula (I) or (II) where R designates a group having 15 carbon atoms.

The Applicant states that the manufacture of these polyurethanes which belong to the HEUR type family of thickeners is perfectly known to the person skilled in the art who can refer to the instructions of the documents cited previously in the technological background to the present invention.
According to one aspect of the present invention, the polyurethanes resulting from the condensation of:
a) 1% to 29% by weight of at least one monomer with the formula (I) or (II), and preferably 3% to 7% by weight,
b) 70% to 98% by weight of at least one polyalkylene glycol, and preferably 86% to 94% by weight, and
c) 1% to 29% by weight of at least one polyisocyanate, and preferably 3% to 7% by weight,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the polyurethanes result from the condensation of two monofunctional alcohols, a polyalkylene glycol and a polyisocyanate. In this case, one of two monofunctional alcohols has a formula (I) or (II) where R designates an alkyl group having 10 to 15 carbon atoms, and preferably 12 or 15 carbon atoms, and the other monofunctional alcohol is of the aliphatic alcohol type, whether linear or branched, having between 6 et 20 carbon atoms, and preferably between 10 and 15 carbon atoms.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, the polyurethanes result from the condensation of:
a) 1 to 29% by weight of a monomer of formula (1):


where R designates an alkyl group having between 10 and 15 carbon atoms, and preferably between 12 and 15 carbon atoms,
b) 70% to 98% by weight of a polyalkylene glycol,
c) 1% to 29% by weight of a polyisocyanate, and
d) 1 to 29% by weight of an aliphatic alcohol having between 6 and 20 carbon atoms, and preferably between 10 and 15 carbon atoms,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
According to one aspect of the present invention, the polyurethanes result from the condensation notably of a polyalkylene glycol which is polyethylene glycol. This may relate, for example, to a polyethylene glycol the molecular mass of which varies between 2,000 g/mol and 20,000 g/mol, for example between 8,000 g/mol and 15,000 g/mol. As an example, polyethylene glycol of molecular mass 10,000 g/mol and 12,000 g/mol may be cited.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the polyurethanes result from the condensation notably oi a polyisocyanate which is chosen from the group consisting of toluene diisocyanate, the toluene diisocyanate dimers and the toluene diisocyanate trimers, 1,4-butane diisocyanate, 1,6-hexane diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, 1,3-cyclohexane diisocyanate, 1,4-cyclohexane diisocyanate, 4,4'diisocyanatodicyclohexylmethane, l-methyl--diisocyanatocyclohexane, a blend of l-methyl-2,4-diisocyanatocyclohexane and
l-methyl-2,6-diisocyanatocyclohexane, the biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate, the dimers of biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate, the trimers of biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate and a blend of at least two of these compounds.
A second object of the present invention relates to a method of preparing a polyurethane according to the invention, where the said method consists of a condensation of the various constituents of the polyurethane.

A third object of the present invention consists of an aqueous composition including a polyurethane according to the present invention.
According to one aspect of the invention, the said aqueous composition also includes water and at least one non-ionic surfactant. Thus, according to this aspect of the invention, the polyurethane is formulated in water in the presence of at least one non-ionic surfactant agent.
A "non-ionic surfactant" or "non-ionic surfactant agent" is understood to mean a non-ionic molecule consisting of at least a hydrophilic part and of at least a hydrophobic part.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the said composition includes several surfactant agents, for example two, three or four.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the said aqueous composition also includes at least one additive selected from the group consisting of a biocide, a solvent an anti-foaming agent, a pH regulator, a coalescent agent and their blends.
A "biocide" is understood to mean a chemical substance intended to destroy, repel or make harmless harmful organisms, to prevent their action, or to oppose them in any other manner, through a chemical or biological action.
An "anti-foaming agent" is understood to mean a substance or a formulation intended to destroy air bubbles within a homogenous or heterogeneous liquid medium (or at its surface), or to prevent their formation.
A "pH regulator" or "pH regulating agent" is understood to mean a chemical compound which enables the pH to be adjusted to the expected value. For example, the pH regulating agent can increase the pH; this is the case with bases, such as

NaOH. Alternatively, the pH regulating agent can reduce the pH; this is the case with acids.
A "coalescent agent" is understood to mean an agent used in paints which enables the Minimum Film Formation Temperature (MFFT) of paint to be reduced to a temperature suitable for the desired conditions of application (for example a TMFF of 5°C for outside application). As an example of a coalescent agent according to the invention, propylene glycol butyl glycol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-l,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate or 2,2,4-trimethyI-l,3-pentanedioI diisobutyrate may be cited.
According to yet another aspect, the aqueous composition of the present invention consists of:
1) 5% to 45% by weight of at least one polyurethane according to the invention, and preferably between 10 and 30% by weight,
2) 5% to 30% by weight of at least one surfactant, and preferably between 7 and 20% by weight,
3) 25% to 75% by weight of water, and
4) 0 to 5% by weight of at least one other additive chosen from the group consisting of a biocide, a solvent, an anti-foaming agent, a pH regulator, a coalescent agent, and their blends,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
According to yet another aspect, the aqueous composition of the present invention consists of a polyurethane as described above, a surfactant, water, a biocide and an anti-foaming agent.
According to another aspect of the invention, the aqueous composition consists of a blend of 5 to 45% by weight of at least one polyurethane as described above, 5 to 30% by weight of at least one surfactant, 25 to 75% by weight of water,

0.01 to 5% by weight of at least one biocide and 0.01 to 5% by weight of at least one anti-foaming agent.
A fourth object of the present invention relates to a method of preparation of an aqueous composition according to the invention, where the said method consists of blending different constituents of the aqueous composition.
A fifth object of the present invention consists of the use of a polyurethane according to the invention or an aqueous composition according to the invention to thicken an aqueous formulation, where the said formulation is selected from the group consisting of a paint, a lacquer, a varnish, a paper coating, a cosmetic formulation and a detergent formulation.
A sixth object of the present invention relates to an aqueous formulation including a polyurethane according to the invention or an aqueous composition according to the invention, where the said formulation is selected from the group consisting of a paint, a lacquer, a varnish, a paper coating, a cosmetic formulation and a detergent formulation.
According to one aspect of this object of the invention, the aqueous formulation is a paint and includes at least one dispersing agent, at least one mineral filler, at least one binder, at least one biocide, at least one anti-foaming agent, and possibly a coalescent agent.
A final object of the present invention relates to a method of preparation of an aqueous formulation according to the invention, where the said method consists of blending different constituents of the aqueous formulation.
The following examples allow a better understanding of the invention without however limiting its scope.

EXAMPLES
Example 1
This example describes a polyurethane according to the invention that uses a compound of formula (II) where R designates the linear alkyl group with 12 carbon atoms. We therefore have here a hydrophobic monomer of the alkyl cyclohexylol type with 18 carbon atoms.
At the same time, this example also illustrates 4 polyurethanes according to the prior art that use linear fatty alcohols with 12,14,16 and 18 carbon atoms.
This example describes a polyurethane apart from the invention that uses a compound of formula (II) where R designates the linear alkyl group with 9 carbon atoms. We therefore have here a hydrophobic monomer of the alkyl cyclohexylol type with 15 carbon atoms.
All the polyurethanes are products that are the result of the condensation, expressed in% by weight of each of the constituents, of 90% polyethylene glycol with a molecular mass by weight equal to 10,000 g/mol, of 5% of a monomer terminated by a hydrophobic group, the nature of which will be specified later, and of 5% of isophorone diisocyanate.
Finally, all these polyurethanes are formulated in water in the presence of a non-ionic surfactant (in this instance, a blend of commercially available branched alcoxylated C8 and C10 compounds) (ratio by weight: 30% polyurethane, 20% surfactant, 50% water).
An aqueous composition is obtained in this manner.

Test No. 1
This test illustrates a domain outside of the invention and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer has the formula (II), where R designates the linear alkyl group with 9 carbon atoms.
Test No. 2
This test illustrates the invention and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer has the formula (II), where R designates the linear alkyl group with 12 carbon atoms.
Test No. 3
This test illustrates the prior art and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer is a linear alcohol with 12 carbon atoms marketed under the name Nacol™ 12-96 by the SASOL™ company.
Test No. 4
This test illustrates the prior art and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer is a linear alcohol with 14 carbon atoms marketed under the name Nacol™ 14-98 by the SASOL™ company.

Test No. 5
This test illustrates the prior art and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer is a linear alcohol with 16 carbon atoms marketed under the name Nacol™ 16-95 by the SASOL™ company.
Test No. 6
This test illustrates the prior art and corresponds to a formulation in water at 30% by dry weight of a polyurethane with a molecular mass by weight equal to approximately 11,000 g/mol where the hydrophobic monomer is a linear alcohol with 18 carbon atoms marketed under the name Nacol™ 18-98 by the SASOL™ company.
Test No. 7
This test demonstrates the prior art and uses Acrysol™ SCT-275 marketed by the DOW™ company, which is an aqueous solution at 17.5% by dry weight of an associative polyurethane containing alkyl phenols.
Example 2
This example demonstrates the use of polyurethanes according to the invention and the prior art as thickening agents for a flat paint
The composition of the said paint is indicated in table 1, the mass of each constituent being indicated in grams.

The paint is formulated according to methods well known to the person skilled in the art.
In each test, 0.2% by dry weight of the polymer according to the invention is used in relation to the total weight of the paint formulation, i.e. approximately for 1 kg of formulation as defined below, 6.67 g of an aqueous composition as mentioned above.

Constituents Mass (g)
Water 190
Ecodis™ P50 (Coatex™) 4
Acticide MBS (Thor™) 2
Tego™ 810 (Tego™) 1
NaOH (20%) 1
Tiona™ 568 (Millenium™) 80
Durcal™ 2 (Omya™) 300
Omyacoat™ 850 OG (Omya™) 220
Acronal™ 290 D (BASF™) 130
Monopropylene glycol 10
Texanol™ (Eastman™) 10
Water QS 1,000
Table 1
The resulting viscosities are then determined at T = 24 hours at 25°C, at low shear rate, Brookfield™ viscosity at 10 RPM, designated μBk10 (mPa.s), and at medium shear rate, Stormer viscosity, designated μs (KU).

Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PA/IN 01 IN PA PA PA PA PA
Associative monomer C15 C18 C12 C14 C16 C18 SCT-
275

μs (KU) 102 128 96 106 125 116 119

μBk10 (mPa.s) 3,800 18,000 3,200 12,000 20,300 23,900 13,850
Table 2
The results are shown in table 2.
It will be apparent to begin with that it is the polyurethane according to the invention (test No. 2) which leads to the highest Stormer™ viscosity.
At the level of the prior art, tests No. 3 and 4 lead to much lower Stormer™ viscosities. Tests No. 5 and 6 are the best placed from the viewpoint of medium shear rate; however, test No. 2 leads to a higher value, for a lower Brookfield™ viscosity.
As to Acrysol™ SCT-275 (test No. 7) which offers a very good compromise between low and medium gradient viscosity, it remains less efficient in terms of pure thickening efficiency compared to the invention.
Finally, test No. 1 demonstrates the importance of limiting the number of carbons in the hydrophobic monomer according to the invention. With only 15 carbon atoms, the polymer in test No. 1 is not effective enough in terms of pure thickening.

Example 3
This example demonstrates the use of polyurethanes according to the invention and the prior art as thickening agents for a flat paint.
The composition of the said paint is indicated in table 3, the mass of each constituent being indicated in grams.
The paint is formulated according to methods well known to the person skilled in the art.
In each test 036% by dry weight of the polymer according to the invention is used in relation to the total weight of the paint formulation.

Constituents Mass (g)
Water 277
Ecodis™ P50 (Coatex™) 4
Acticide MBS (Thor™) 2
Tego™ Airex 901 W (Tego™) 1
NaOH (20%) 0.9
Tiona™ 568 (Millenium™) 81
Durcal™ 2 (Omya™) 300.1
Omyacoat™ 850 OG (Omya™) 133
Mowilith LDM1871™ (Celanese™) 150
Tego™ 825 (Tego™) 10
Water QS 1,000
Table 3

The resulting viscosities are then determined at T = 24 hours at 25°C, at low shear rate, Brookfield™ viscosity at 10 RPM, designated UBk10 (mPa.s), and at medium shear rate, Stormer viscosity, designated μs (KU).

Test No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
PA/IN OI IN PA PA PA PA PA
associative monomer C15 C18 C12 C14 C16 C18 SCT-275

Us (KU) 104 137 100 110 135 121 117

UBWO (mPa.s) 10,200 25,000 8,800 20,000 36,000 45,000 17,100
Table 4
The results are shown in table 4.
As was previously the case, it is the polyurethane according to the invention (test No. 2) which leads to the highest Stormer™ viscosity.
At the level of the prior art, tests No. 3 and 4 lead to lower Stormer™ viscosities. Tests No. 5 and 6 are then the best placed from the viewpoint of medium shear rate, but for a Brookfield™ viscosity that is much higher than that according to the invention.
As to Acrysol™ SCT-275 (test No. 7) which offers a very good compromise between low and medium gradient viscosity, it remains less efficient in terms of pure thickening efficiency compared to the invention.

Finally, test No. 1 which leads to a low thickening power demonstrates the interest in limiting the number of carbons in the hydrophobic monomer according to the invention.

WE CLAIM:
1 - Water soluble polyurethane resulting condensation: a) of at least one monomer with the formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group with 10 to 15 carbon atoms,
b) of at least one polyalkylene glycol, and
c) and of at least one polyisocyanate.
2 - Polyurethanes according to claim 1 resulting from the condensation of: a) a monomer of formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group having 10 to 15 carbon atoms,
b) a polyalkylene glycol,
c) a polyisocyanate, and
d) an aliphatic alcohol having between 6 and 20 carbon atoms.

3 - Polyurethanes according to claim 1, resulting from the condensation of:
a) 1% to 29% by weight of at least one monomer of formula (I),
b) 70% to 98% by weight of at least one polyalkylene glycol, and
c) 1% to 29% by weight of at least one polyisocyanate where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
4 - Polyurethanes according to claim 1 or 3, resulting from the condensation of
a) 3% to 7% by weight of at least one monomer of formula (I),
b) 86% to 94% by weight of at least one polyalkylene glycol and
c) 3% to 7% by weight of at least one polyisocyanate where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
5 - Polyurethanes according to any of the previous claims, where the polylakylene
glycol is preferentially polyethylene glycol the molecular mass by weight of which varies between 2,000 g/mol and 20,000 g/mol.
6- Polyurethanes according to any of the previous claims, where the polyisocyanate is chosen from the group consisting of toluene diisocyanate, the toluene diisocyanate dimers, the toluene diisocyanate trimers, 1,4-butane diisocyanate, 1,6-hexane diisocyanate isophorone diisocyanate, 1,3-cyclohexane diisocyanate, 1,4-cyclohexane diisocyanate, 4,4'diisocyanatodicyclohexylmethane, l-methyl-2,4-diisocyanatocyclohexane, a blend of l-methyl-2,4-diisocyanatocyclohexane and
l-methyl-2,6-diisocyanatocyclohexane, the biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate, the dimers of the biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate, the trimers of biuret of hexamethylene diisocyanate, and a blend of at least two of these compounds.

7- Polyurethanes according to any of the previous claims, where the said monomer a) has a formula (I) where R designates a group having 12 carbon atoms.
8 - Polyurethanes according to claim 1 or 2, resulting from the condensation of: a) 1 to 29% by weight of a monomer of formula (I):

where R designates an alkyl group having between 10 and 15 carbon atoms,
b) 70% to 98% by weight of polyalkylene glycol,
c) 1% to 29% by weight of a polyisocyanate, and
d) 1% to 29% by weight of an aliphatic alcohol having between 6 and 20 carbon atoms,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
9 - Polyurethanes according to claim 8, resulting from the condensation of;
a) 1% to 29% by weight oi a monomer oi formula (I), where R designates an alkyl group having between 12 and 15 carbon atoms,
b) 70% to 98% by weight of a polyalkylene glycol,
c) 1% to 29% by weight of a polyisocyanate, and
d) 1% to 29% by weight of an aliphatic alcohol having between 10 and 15 carbon atoms,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.

10 - An aqueous composition including a polyurethane according to any of claims
l to 9,
11 - An aqueous composition according to claim 10, also including water and a
surfactant.
12 - An aqueous composition according to claim 10 or 11, also including at least one
additive selected from the group consisting of a biocide, a solvent, an anti-foaming agent, a pH regulator, a coalescent agent and their blends.
13 - An aqueous composition according to any of the claims 10 to 12, containing:
1) 5% to 45% by weight of at least one polyurethane according to any of the claims 1 to 9,
2) 5% to 30% by weight of at least one surfactant,
3) 25% to 75% by weight of water, and
4) 0 to 5% by weight of at least one other additive chosen from the group consisting of a biocide, a solvent, an anti-foaming agent, a pH regulator, a coalescent agent and their blends,
where the sum of these mass percentages is equal to 100%.
14 - An aqueous formulation including a polyurethane according to any of the
claims 1 to 9 or an aqueous composition according to any of the claims 10 to 13, where the said formulation is selected from the group consisting of a paint, a lacquer, a varnish, a paper coating, a cosmetic formulation and a detergent formulation.

15 - Use of a polyurethane according to any of the claims 1 to 9 or an aqueous
composition according to any of the claims 10 to 13, to thicken an aqueous formulation, where the said formulation is selected from the group consisting of a paint, a lacquer, a varnish, a paper coating, a cosmetic formulation and a detergent formulation.
16 - A method of preparation of a polyurethane according to any of the claims
1 to 9, consisting of a condensation of its various constituents.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 1(26-11-2013).pdf 2013-11-26
2 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE(26-11-2013).pdf 2013-11-26
3 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM PCT-ISA-237(20-12-2013).pdf 2013-12-20
4 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE(20-12-2013).pdf 2013-12-20
5 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE-(21-10-2014).pdf 2014-10-21
6 2098-MUMNP-2013.pdf 2018-08-11
7 2098-MUMNP-2013-WO INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION REPORT A1.pdf 2018-08-11
8 2098-MUMNP-2013-PCT-ISA-210.pdf 2018-08-11
9 2098-MUMNP-2013-PCT REQUEST.pdf 2018-08-11
10 2098-MUMNP-2013-GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY(4-12-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
11 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 5.pdf 2018-08-11
12 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 3.pdf 2018-08-11
13 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 3(7-5-2014).pdf 2018-08-11
14 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 3(12-2-2014).pdf 2018-08-11
15 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 2.pdf 2018-08-11
16 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE).pdf 2018-08-11
17 2098-MUMNP-2013-FORM 1.pdf 2018-08-11
18 2098-MUMNP-2013-ENGLISH TRANSLATION.pdf 2018-08-11
19 2098-MUMNP-2013-DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE).pdf 2018-08-11
20 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2018-08-11
21 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE(7-5-2014).pdf 2018-08-11
22 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE(4-12-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
23 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE(12-2-2014).pdf 2018-08-11
24 2098-MUMNP-2013-CLAIMS.pdf 2018-08-11
25 2098-MUMNP-2013-ABSTRACT.pdf 2018-08-11
26 2098-MUMNP-2013-FER.pdf 2018-12-17
27 2098-MUMNP-2013-OTHERS [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
28 2098-MUMNP-2013-FER_SER_REPLY [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
29 2098-MUMNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
30 2098-MUMNP-2013-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
31 2098-MUMNP-2013-CLAIMS [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
32 2098-MUMNP-2013-ABSTRACT [08-06-2019(online)].pdf 2019-06-08
33 2098-MUMNP-2013-PatentCertificate14-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-14
34 2098-MUMNP-2013-IntimationOfGrant14-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-14
35 2098-MUMNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [21-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-21
36 2098-MUMNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [03-04-2021(online)].pdf 2021-04-03
37 2098-MUMNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [12-04-2022(online)].pdf 2022-04-12
38 2098-MUMNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [17-06-2023(online)].pdf 2023-06-17

Search Strategy

1 pdfviewer_17-12-2018.pdf

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2014 - To 12/06/2015

4th: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2015 - To 12/06/2016

5th: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2016 - To 12/06/2017

6th: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2017 - To 12/06/2018

7th: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2018 - To 12/06/2019

8th: 25 Jul 2019

From 12/06/2019 - To 12/06/2020

9th: 09 May 2020

From 12/06/2020 - To 12/06/2021

10th: 05 May 2021

From 12/06/2021 - To 12/06/2022

11th: 05 May 2022

From 12/06/2022 - To 12/06/2023

12th: 04 May 2023

From 12/06/2023 - To 12/06/2024