Nutrient Yielding Bio-Renewable Controlled Release Fertilizer Coatings
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates to a biologically derived resinous material that is
5 herein termed a "biomaterial." In particular embodiments, this invention relates to a
biomaterial that is derived, in part, from animal waste. In specific embodiments, the
biomaterial is employed as a coating applied to fertilizer particles. More particularly,
this invention relates to biomaterial coatings that are themselves nutrient yielding
and are obtained in whole or in part from bidlogically renewable resources. In some
10 instances, the coatings serve to control the release of the fertilizer particles into the
environment; in other instances, the coating reduces caking during storage and
transport and/or reduces the formation of dust on storage; and, in other instances,
the coating can perform any one or any combination of all of the aforementioned
functions.
BACKGROUONFD T HE INVENTION
[0002] The disposal of animal waste has become a very important issue in
intensive animal farming. The excreta of various intensively farmed animals, though
rich in nutrients, is potentially polluting to the environment. For example, nitrogen
20 and phosphorous compounds from cow, horse and swine manure can contaminate
d5 -
surface water and can even leach into groundwater, and ammonia and methane gas
given off from stored manure or slurry can cause respiratory distress to people and
animals in the local vicinity. As a result, there is a drive to put animal waste to
beneficial uses, to reduce the amount disposed of and/or stored and thereby reduce
25 the n-eg ative impact on the environment. Although, animal wastes are currently
employed in the creation of organic fertilizers, this use does not eliminate
environmental impact because the waste is still often exposed to the environment as
the organic fertilizers are created, thus still contributing to surface and ground water
contamination.
30 [0003] Animal wastes have also being employed in the creation of biogas. Biogas
digesters and lagoons use anaerobic bacteria to digest organic material in the
absence of oxygen and produce biogas (methane) as a waste product. Biogas can be
used for heating, cooking and operating internal combustion engines, and can be
converted into electricity. But methane is a greenhouse gas, and such gases are
currently blamed for all sorts of ills, particularly an alleged warming of the global
temperature, with allegedly potentially catastrophic consequences. Additionally, the
start-up costs for implementing biogas generators and gas cleaning apparatus are
quite large, making it financially difficult to implement this animal waste disposal
5 option.
[0004] There is thus a need in the art for developing additional beneficial uses for
animal waste. Not only would this put a very readily renewable resource to use, but it
would also help to eliminate such waste as a source of pollution. Because animal
wastes have been well-receiveed in fertilizer applications, this invention seeks to
10 incorporate the use of animal waste as coatings in the current fertilizer offerings.
This incorporation also advances the art by freeing up the common coating
components, such as petroleum-based hydrocarbon matter, for use in other
applications. Because fertilizers are a focus of this invention, some background of the
fertilizer industry follows.
15 [0005] Chemical compounds and mixtures of chemical comp&nds have been
.used for hundreds of years for the purpose of modifying the natural chemical
composition of soils in order to enhance the growth and health of plant life. For
centuries these products were obtained from natural materials and waste materials
that were readily available and relatively easy to harvest. For example, people have
20 used animal manure such as guano, cow manure and horse manure as a fertilizer for
field crops, primarily for their phosphorous and nitrogen content. As technology
advanced, people employed more sophisticated and efficient means for adding
nutrients to the soil.
[0006] Justus von Liebig developed the first commercial - nitrogen-based fertilizer - 25 (ammunia) back in the early 19th century in Germany, and, since that time, chemical
compounds such as ammonium nitrate, urea, ammonium sulfate, potassium chloride
and various phosphate compositions have been synthetically manufactured for use in
liquid and solid fertilizer formulations. The implementation of these advances in
fertilizer technology has resulted in large increases in crop yields for agricultural
30 applications and an improvement in the appearance and health of turf grass and
ornamental plants.
[0007] Due to the growing world population, the limited availability of
productive crop land, and the alternative uses for which some types of crops are

[0011] The use of biologically derived materials as adjuvants in the production of
controlled release fertilizers has been disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,478,375. One of
the%basicc omponents of the materials claimed (tallow) requires the destruction of
livestock in order to obtain the precursor to the product. The other (soybeans)
5 requires the harvest of a material that has a very important food value. None of these
routes to producing controlled release fertilizer particles takes advantage of a waste
stream of material that would otherwise be considered at best an environmental
nuisance and at worst a significant contributor to serious ecological problems.
[0012] - Many fertilizers, particularly granular fertilizers have a tendency to stick
10 together during transport and storage. This phenomenon, called "caking" in the
vernacular of the fertilizer industry, is brought about by the natural tendency of the
granules to combine with one another based on their chemical and physical
compatibilities including their tendency to be hygroscopic (tending to absorb
moisture, even from the atmosphere). There are two widely accepted mechanisms
15 explaining caking. The first is called crystal bridging, wherein, in- the presence of
moisture, molecules from one granule combine with the molecules from adjacent
contacting molecules, forming bridges of the molecular crystals. The second
mechanism for caking is called capillary adhesion, wherein the hydraulic forces
brought into play by virtue of the absorption of water into the porosity of the
20 granules creates tenacious bonding forces. The tendency for fertilizer granules to
cake and the degree of caking is dependent upon the type of fertilizer, the geometric
shape of the granules, the environmental conditions during production, storage and
transport, the pressure applied during storage, as well as other variables. Some of
the common types of fertilizers that cake during storage and transport include urea,
. 25 ammonium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, calcium nitrate, ammonium sulfate,
potash, super phosphates and complex fertilizers such as NPK's (nitrogenphosphorous-
potassium fertilizers).
[0013] Granular fertilizers such as ammonium phosphate, potash, super
phosphates and NPK's have another disadvantage, that of generating dust during
30 manufacture, handling, transport and storage by the abrasive effects of these
resultant actions on the granules or by the decomposition of the granule itself due to
cohesive losses and in some cases, most notably with ammonium nitrate from
volumetric inconsistencies due to crystal phase changes.
[0014] Chemical additives have been used for decades in the treatment of
granule fertilizers for both anticaking and dust control applications. In the case of
anticaking agents, finely sized dispersed particles of talc, and various clay minerals
such as attapulgite and diatomaceous earth have been used as a surface dressing.
5 These fine particles reduce the intimate contact between the fertilizer granules and
also serve to absorb residual moisture that can also contribute to the caking
phenomenon. Smith addresses the use of attapulgite clay as an anticaking agent in.
U.S. Patent No. 3,041,159 and again in U.S. Patent No. 3,125,434. Similarly, Sutton in
U.S. Patent No. 3,886,641 discloses the use of calcined Kaolin as an anticaking agent
10 for granular fertilizers.
[0015] Waxes, oils and other hydrophobic compounds in some cases modified by
the addition of surface active chemicals such as fatty amine, fatty acids and alkyl
sulfonates have also been widely used as anticaking coatings, and, because many of
the same phenomenon that cause caking also play a part in the generation of dust,
15 many of these compounds are used for preventing dust generation-as well. In many
cases, however; dust control is an independent issue particularly in production and
storage and must be dealt with as such. In these cases the granules are typically
coated with very inexpensive compounds which serve the basic purpose of absorbing
fugitive dust particles on to the treated surface of the granules. In these cases
20 inexpensive, readily available materials such as mineral oil, vegetable oil, petrolatum,
waste oils and various pitches derived from the processing of pine trees used in
making paper and wood products and combinations thereof can be used without the
need of any active chemicals that would increase the cost of the formula. The
drawback of using these products is that they do not add any nutrient value to the
, 25 fertilizer; their use in anti-dust and/or anti-caking applications prevents their use in
other potentially more useful applications such as lubricants and food stuffs; and
their use can be harmful to the environment.
[0016] In each of the above mentioned cases of prior art formulations, the
addition of the prior art coating agents reduces the overall concentration of active
30 plant nutrient in the fertilizer as a whole, thereby diluting its desired effect on the
plant growth for which it was intended. The art would therefore benefit from a
fertilizer coating that is itself nutrient yielding, biologically renewable and waste
reducing whether the coating is provided to affect a slow release of the main
fertilizer components or is provided for anti-caking properties or is provided for dust
control or for any combination of those foregoing properties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
5 [0017] It is an object of the present invention to provide a biomaterial
composition that is derived from biologically renewable sources, which, in particular
embodiments are animal waste sources.
[0018] It is another object to provide a method for producing the biomaterial
composition from raw animal waste.
10 [0019] It is another object to provide an improvement to solid fertilizer particles
by the inclusion of a coating layer derived from the biomaterial composition, the
coating layer providing one or more of the following properties: imparting slow or
controlled release properties to the fertilizer, preventing or reducing the tendency of
the fertilizer particles to cake together, or preventing or reducing the tendency of the
15 fertilizer particles to evolve dust.
[0020] A further objective of this invention is to provide a coating layer, as above,
that is nutrient ylelding and therefore is itself beneficial to the plant growth process.
[0021] In coatings imparting slow or controlled release properties, it is yet a
further object to modify the biomaterial with polymers and other chemical additives
20 to reduce the hydrophilic nature of the biomaterial and effect changes in its physical
and chemical properties as necessary to achieve the desired results of the coating.
[0022] Other objects and further scope of applicability of the present invention
will become apparent from the detail of the description provided in this document.
The detailed descriptions provided while indicating preferred embodiments of the
, 25 invention are for illustrative purposes only, since modifications within the scope and
spirit of the invention will become apparent therefrom.
[0023] In one embodiment, this invention provides a fertilizer composition
comprising: a plant nutrient core containing at least one water soluble plant nutrient;
and a biomaterial coating layer including a biomaterial derived from animal waste.
30
BRIEFD ESCRIPTIOONF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] Fig. 1 provides a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a two-layer
fertilizer composition of this invention; and
[0025] Fig. 2 provides a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a multi-layer
fertilizer composition of this invention.
DETAILEDDE SCRIPTIOONF ILLUSTRATIVEE MBODIMENTS
[0026] In accordance with the present invention, beneficial use is made of animal
waste by converting it into what is broadly referred to herein as a "biomaterial," the
name indicating that it is a material that comes from a biological source. This
biomaterial is employed as a coating. In particular embodiments, the biomaterial is
employed in a biomaterial coating layer to coat plant nutrient core components,
which are generally to be understood as any component that serves as a plant
nutrient, whether currently employed in that manner (as, for example, urea,
ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, di-ammonium phosphate
or complex fertilizers containing nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium) or
hereinafter discovered or developed for such purposes. In some embodiments, the
biomaterial is further modified with one or more of the following: polymers,
compatibilizing agents, other resins, extenders, modifiers or fillers.
[0027] The biomaterial is derived from animal waste, with the understanding
that "animal waste" as used herein includes not only the typically understood animal
excreta but also the bodies of the animals themselves. That is, "animal waste" herein
may include dead animal bodies and portions thereof. In accordance, with this
invention, the biomaterial may be produced from animal excreta, from animal bodies
or both. Because animal excreta can be employed without destruction of the host
animal and further because the disposal of excreta can cause significant
environmental impact, it is preferable to use only animal excreta and other waste
mat6rials from the host animals particularly hair and other such fugitive substances.
However, animal farming and meat production can result in a number of dead animal
bodies (whole or body parts), and this invention can provide a way in which to
beneficially dispose of such bodies, converting them to a biomaterial.
[0028] Thus, in particular embodiments, the animal waste is animal excreta,
particularly manure, which should be understood as being the combined feces, urine
and added products such as water, wasted feed, hair and bedding for the animals,
which added products are typically very difficult to separate from the urine/feces
excreta. The manure may come from any animal source, even human. Pig, chicken,
cow, lamb, goat, and horse manure are likely to be the best source for producing the
biomaterial because a great number of these animals are often gathered together in
oneplace for animal farming, thus yielding a significant amount of manure in one
place for easier collection. Pig manure is of particular interest because pigs tend to
5 produce a large amount of manure, as compared to other animals.
[0029] The manure can be liquid slurry, a semi-solid, or a dry form, though, if it is
obtained in a dry form, is preferably treated to be a slurry or semi-slurry so that it
can be processed in a chemical converted as taught below, because liquid and slurry
forms are easier to work with and to incorporate components. Manure usually has
10 the characteristics of a liquid when it has 15% solids or less, but might be found to
have the characteristics of a solid at 20% solids or greater. Dry manure can be
broken up and mixed with water or other extenders and/or fillers to create the
desired slurry and percent solids content for the process herein.
[0030] In this invention, the biomaterial is produced by a thermochemical (i.e.,
15 pyrolysis) reaction or hydro-thermal conversion process whereby a combination of
high temperature and pressure in the absence of oxygen produces smaller
hydrocarbon molecules from the larger ones found in animal waste. The animal
waste is processed in the form of slurry having a solids content of less than 20%, in
other embodiments, less that 15%, in yet other embodiments, less than lo%, and in
20 other embodiments, 5% or less. The collected liquid slurry waste is processed by first
pumping the matter through a particle size reduction apparatus so that it can more
readily be pumped through the reactor tubing or piping of the converter. In some
embodiments a 200 mesh screen is used. The animal waste is processed in the
absence of oxygen, at a temperature of from 100 to 400 "C, and the pressure is
, 25 maintained sufficiently high to ensure that the slurry, which is comprised of a
significant amount of water, does not boil.
[0031] In some embodiments of this process, the converter is pressurized to a
minimum pressure of 200 psi (pounds per square inch), in other embodiments, a
minimum pressure of 400 psi, in other embodiments, a minimum pressure of about
30 800 psi, in other embodiments a minimum pressure of 1200 psi, in yet other
embodiments a minimum pressure of 1600 psi, and in yet other embodiments a
minimum pressure of 1800 psi. In some embodiments, at these pressures, the
converter is heated to a temperature between 100 and 400 "C, in other embodiments,
from 150 to 375 "C, and in other embodiment, from 200 to 350 "C. In particular
embodiments the temperature is maintained near 300 "C. Notably, the processing is
carried out in the absence of free oxygen, to prevent the oxidation of chemical
compounds. In partimlar processes, the converter is pressurized to a pressure of
5 from 1600 psi to 1800 psi and is heated to a temperature between 250 and 350 "C, in
the absence of free oxygen, to prevent the oxidation of chemical compounds. In the
process, after about 10 to 100 minutes at the above processing conditions, it is
believed that the high molecular weight comppunds of the animal waste are cleaved,
thereby forming smaller hydrocarbon molecules which are more useful in the
10 present invention. The product resulting from this process is the "biomaterial" of this
invention. Processing parameters and equipment are disclosed in Ocfemia, K. S.,
Zhang, Y. H., and Funk, T. (2006), Hydrothermal processing of Swine Manure into Oil
Using a Continuous Reactor System: Development and Testing, Transactions of ASAE
49(2), 533-541 and Ocfemia, K. S., Zhang, Y. H., and Funk, T. (2006), Hydrothermal
15 Processing of Swine Manure to Oil Using a Continuous Reactor System-Effects of
Operating Parameters on Oil Yield and Quality, Transactions of ASAE 49(6), 1897-
1904, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Currently,
acceptable biomaterial is produced by Advanced BioRefinery Inc. (Ottawa, Canada)
and Innoventor Inc. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Regarding Innoventor's work, see U.S.
20 Patent No. 7,105,088, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. ~-
[0032] Following the conversion process, the liquid slurry biomaterial is pumped
to a filtration processor where the solids are concentrated prior to being dried. The
biomaterial is dried to facilitate storage and transportation, particularly with regard
to volume and weight. The biomaterial is preferably dried to have a minimum solids
25 content of from 95 to 100%. At 25°C the dried product is a solid resinous substance
similar in consistency to asphalt and can be made liquid by heating to higher
temperatures.
[0033] The biomaterial of this invention is a substance rich in polar organic
compounds, including nitrogen and phosphorous containing compounds,
30 hydrocarbons and inorganic minerals. The resulting resin can be used neat as a
biomaterial coating layer as taught herein, particularly when dust control is the main
function to be served by the coating layer, but, in some applications, the biomaterial
coating layer may include the biomaterial and additional polymers, compatibilizing
agents, other resins, extenders, modifiers and fillers. These additional components,
when desired for particular end uses, are incorporated into the biomaterial by simple
addition and mixing or by in situ addition during the process of applying the
biomaterial to the fertilizer. -- *- ---
5 [0034] The biomaterial is somewhat hydrophilic, having emanated from a
biologically hydro-systemic process, and, as such, may be found to break down and
release too quickly in water-based environments, such as that encountered by
fertilizers, particularly by contact with dew,, rain water, feed water and the like.
Thus, when employed for the purpose of acting as a fertilizer coating the biomaterial
10 will benefit from the incorporation of polymers or other additives such as stearic
acid, tallow amines, salts thereof and various waxes. As generally known, such
polymer and other additions can make the biomaterial more robust, improving its
moisture resistance to make the biomaterial more hydrophobic and thus reduce its
rate of decomposition and dissolution when contacted by water. These additives
15 may also serve to impart greater mechanical strength to the resin thereby improving
its physical attributes in given applications, such as by improving the abrasion
resistance of the coating. Non-limiting examples of useful polymer additions include
polymers, copolymers and terpolymers containing monomers of polyvinyl chloride,
styrene, ethylene, butadiene, vinyl acetate, isoprene, maleic anhydride, acrylic esters
20 and acrylonitrile. As mentioned, other additives used for these purposes can include
stearic acid, tallow amines, salts thereof and various waxes.
[0035] Particularly useful polymers in this regard include the copolymers of
ethylene and vinyl acetate that are known as EVA'S and are available from a variety
of suppliers worldwide including DuPont, Arkema and Repsol. Particularly effective
.. 25 ~VA'sareth ose that are high in vinyl acetate content due to their compatibility with a
broader range of polar resins and their excellent adhesion to non-porous surfaces.
The melt flow requirement of the additive copolymer will depend upon the particular
nutrient being coated by the composition of the present invention. For example, low
melt temperature fertilizers such as urea will require the use of a biomaterial coating
30 composition that is able to flow at lower temperatures thereby requiring a high melt
flow index. Conversely, higher melt point fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate can
be coated with biomaterial coating compositions containing low melt flow polymers
since the process temperature can be elevated to the point of acceptable flow for
coating the particles.
[0036] As generally practiced in the art of current fertilizer coatings, the
biomaterial coatings of this invention may include useful compatibilizing agents that
5 serve to chemically or physically compatibilize the biomaterial coating with a
particular fertilizer it is to coat and/or with additional additives being added to the
biomaterial. Thus, the compatibilizing agents may include surfactants that serve to
chemically compatibilize and/or permit the biomaterial to interact with the fertilizer
or coatings on the fertilizer or other additives to the biomaterial coating. For
10 example, if waxes are included in the biomaterial coating, a surfactant may be desired
to help the biomaterial mix with the wax because the biomaterial includes a polar
constituency that may not otherwise be readily compatible with waxes (note, wax
additions are mentioned below). Non-limiting examples of useful surfactants include
hydrocarbons with one or more amine functionalities; hydrocarbons with one or
15 more carboxylic acid functionalities; mixtures of hydrocarbons containing one or
more amine functionalities with hydrocarbons containing one or more carboxylic
acid functionalities; and hydrocarbons with one or more sulfonate moieties. Nonlimiting
examples of such surfactants include tallow and hydrogenated tallow amine,
tallow diamine, stearic acid, oleic acid, tall oil fatty acids and rosin acids.
20 [0037] Due to biomaterial's primarily hydrocarbon content, the physical and
chemical properties of the biomaterial are readily capable of modification with
resinous hydrocarbon compounds. Resins with functional polar moieties are
preferred due to their higher level of solubility in the biomaterial and compatibility
with polymer additives. Non-limiting examples of useful resin additives include tall
, 25 oil pitch, rosin esters, hydrocarbon resins.
[0038] Since the biomaterial can emanate from animal waste streams it will
likely contain inherent objectionable odors that could otherwise prohibit or limit its
use in some applications. It is therefore desirable to add odor modifiers that reduce
or eliminate the objectionable odors by means of absorption;masking or chemical
30 modification. Non-limiting examples of useful odor modifiers include activated
carbon, vanilla, benzaldehyde, acetophenone, methyl salicylate, d'limonene and
various perf-u mes.
[0039] In order to modify the viscosity or flowability of the biomaterial in its
various applications, it may be necessary to extend it by the addition of an extender
or viscosity modifier in the form of solvents and other diluents. Such viscosity
modifiers may also serve to enhance other desirable properties of the biomaterial
5 such as compatibility with and between other additives. Non limiting examples of
extenders and viscosity modifiers include tallow, glycerin, mineral oils, vegetable oils
and hydrocarbon wax. Particularly useful waxes and oils are those that contain polar
moieties such as alcohol, ether or ester groups,.
[0040] Since the biomaterial is somewhat thermoplastic in nature it may be
10 necessary to increase its resistance to flow along with its ability to withstand
deformation forces in certain applications. Such properties can be enhanced by using
finely ground mineral and synthetic fillers and or natural and synthetic fibers. Non
limiting examples of useful fillers include talc, diatomaceous earth calcium carbonate,
silica, cellulose, cellulose fibers and synthetic fibers.
15 [0041] A biomaterial coating layer in accordance with this invention may be
100% biomaterial, particularly where it is being employed mainly for dust control. In
other embodiments, a biomaterial coating layer may include from 1 to 99% by
weight biomaterial and from 99% to 1% of the various additions disclosed herein. In
other embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer include from 5 to 95% by weight
20 biomaterial and from 95 to 5% by weight of the various additions. In yet other
embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer includes from 10 to 90% by weight
biomaterial and from 90 to 10% by weight of the various additions. In yet other
embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer includes from 15 to 85% by weight
biomaterial and from 85 to 15% by weight of the various additions. In yet other
, 25 embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer includes from 20 to 80% by weight
biomaterial and from 80 to 20% by weight of the various additions.
[0042] If polymers additions are employed, the biomaterial coating layer may
include from 0.1 to 50 % by weight additive polymer. In other embodiments, the
biomaterial coating layer may include from 3 to 35% by weight additive polymer, in
30 yet other embodiments, from 5 to 25 % additive polymer, and in yet other
embodiments, from 10 to 25 % additive polymer.
[0043] If compatibilizing agents are employed, the biomaterial coating layer may
include from 0.1 to 25 % by weight compatibilizing agents. In other embodiments,
the biomaterial coating layer may include from 1.0 to 20% by weight compatibilizing
agents, and in yet other embodiments, from 2 to 10% by weight compatibilizing
agents.
[0044] If resin additions are employed the biomaterial coating layer may include
5 from 0.25 to 50% by weight resins. In other embodiments, the biornaterial coating
layer may include from 0.5 to 40% by weight resins, and in yet other embodiments,
from 5 to 25% by weight resins.
[0045] If extenders are employed, the biomaterial coating layer may include from
0.1 to 50 % by weight extenders. In other embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer
10 may include from 0.5 to 40% by weight extenders, in yet other embodiments from 5
to 25, and in yet other embodiments from 10 to 15% extenders.
[0046] If odor modifiers are employed, the biomaterial coating layer may include
from 0.001 to 10% by weight modifiers. In other embodiments, the biomaterial
coating layer may include from to 0.05 to 5% by weight odor modifiers, and in yet
15 other embodiments from 0.01 to 1% by weight odor modifiers.
[0047] If fillers are employed, the biomaterial coating layer may include from 0.1
to 50 % by weight fillers. In other embodiments, the biomaterial coating layer may
include from 0.5 to 25 % by weight filler, and in yet other embodiments from 1 to
15% by weight fillers.
20 [0048] In accordance with an embodiment of this invention, the biornaterial is
employed as a coating on a plant nutrient core component, the coating serving to do
one or more or any combination of the following: (a) impart a slow or controlled
release property to the fertilizer, (b) prevent or reduce the tendency of the fertilizer
particles to cake together, or (c) prevent or reduce the tendency of the fertilizer
, 25 part&s to create dust. In this embodiment, the biomaterial may be applied directly
to a plant nutrient co're component, thus creating a two-layer fertilizer composition
10, as shown in Fig. 1, with a plant nutrient core 12 and biomaterial coating layer 14
coating the core 12.
[0049] The plant nutrient core component may be selected from virtually any
30 component that serves as a nutrient to a plant, whether a currently-employed
fertilizer or a hereinafter discovered or developed fertilizer or other nutrient
component. In particular embodiments the plant nutrient core component is selected
from urea, ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate-nitrate,
calcium nitrate, calcium ammonium nitrate, phosphorous compounds such as
ammonium phosphate, mono- and di-ammonium phosphate, and triple super
phosphate, and potassium compounds such as potassium chloride and potassium
sulfate, often referred to as potash. Combinations of the foregoing may also be
5 employed to produce complex plant nutrient cores, and, as is generally known, other
common fertilizer elements such as iron, manganese and magnesium may be
included in minor amounts. The plant nutrient core component and the multitude of -
specific compounds and components that cantbe employed as the plant nutrient core
component are well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, this
10 invention focuses on the beneficial use of the biornaterial.
[0050] In particular two-layer embodiments such as those in Fig. 1, the fertilizer
composition 10 is made up of from 50 to 99.9% by weight plant nutrient core and
from 50 to 0.1% by weight biomaterial coating layer. In other two-layer
embodiments, the fertilizer composition 10 includes from 90 to 99% by weight plant
15 nutrient core and from 10 to 1% by weight biomaterial coating layer. In yet other
two-layer embodiments, the fertilizer composition 10 includes from 92 to 97% by
weight plant nutrient core and from 8 to 3% by weight biomaterial coating layer.
[0051] In the embodiment of Fig. 1, the plant nutrient core 12 is formed as it is
commonly formed in the prior art, as, again, it is not the focus of this invention to be
20 concerned with the production of these plant nutrient core compounds, which are
generally available. Although this invention is not to be limited to a particular
coating process, the plant nutrient core 12 may be covered with the biomaterial
coating layer 14 by spraying, dripping or streaming the biomaterial onto a rolling bed
of plant nutrient core granules carried in a coating drum or similar such mixing
, 25 deviceas commonly used in the industry. The biomaterial may also be sprayed onto
the plant nutrient core while the core particles are carried in a fluidized bed.
[0052] Notably, as already mentioned, because the biomaterial is derived from
animal waste, it includes polar organic compounds, including nitrogen and
phosphorous containing compounds, hydrocarbons and inorganic minerals, and it .
30 has been unexpectedly found that the biomaterial will release nutrients when used as
part of a fertilizer composition. Indeed, improved plant growth has been observed
when employing compositions of this invention on an inert core, and comparing
plant growth using just the inert core versus plant growth using an inert core coated
with a biomaterial coating layer of this invention. The nutrients contained in the
biomaterial may also be beneficially time released from the biomaterial coating layer.
[0053] In other embodiments as shown in Fig. 2, the biomaterial may be applied
in addition to typical fertilizer coating layers, such that a multi-layer fertilizer
5 composition 16, would be created, having a plant nutrient core 12, at least one typical
fertilizer coating layer 18, and a biomaterial coating layer 14. In this embodiment, the
biomaterial coating layer is included to do one or more or any combination of the
following: (a) impart a slow or controlled release property to the fertilizer, (b)
prevent or reduce the tendency of the fertilizer particles to cake together (c) prevent
10 or reduce the tendency of the fertilizer particles to create dust, and (d) impart
abrasion resistance or void filling enhancement to (i.e., fill voids present in) the
primary coating of the fertilizer.
[0054] In still further embodiments, the biomaterial may be applied as a first
coating layer or layers and subsequently over-coated with a secondary coating layer
15 comprised of a different substance and even a tertiary layer and so on as necessary to
create the desired end result. For example, the biomaterial coating layer 14 and the
fertilizer coating layer 18 of the embodiment of Fig. 2 could be switched and/or
additional coating layers could be employed.
[0055] The plant nutrient core may be selected as disclosed above. The fertilizer
20 coating layer may be selected from virtually any fertilizer coating whether currently
employed of hereinafter discovered and developed. In particular embodiments, the
fertilizer coating layer is selected from polyurethanes, epoxies, sulfur, and polyvinyl
chlorides (PVC). The fertilizer coating layer and the multitude of specific compounds
and components that can be employed as the fertilizer coating layer are well
. -
, 25 understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, this invention focuses on the
beneficial use of the biomaterial.
[0056] In particular multi-layer embodiments such as those in Fig. 2, the
fertilizer composition 10 is made up of from 50 to 99.4% by weight plant nutrient
core, from 0.5 to 25% by weight fertilizer coating layer, and from 0.1 to 25% by
30 weight biomaterial coating layer. In other multi-layer embodiments, the fertilizer
composition 10 includes from 75 to 97% by weight plant nutrient core, from 2 to
15% by weight fertilizer coating layer, and from 1 to 10% by weight biomaterial. In
yet other embodiments the fertilizer composition 10 is made up of from 85 to 95%
by weight plant nutrient core, from 3 to 10% by weight fertilizer coating layer, and
from 2 to 5% by weight biomaterial coating layer.
[0057] In ihe embodiment of Fig. 2, the plant nutrient core 12 is formed as it is
commonly formed in the prior art, and the fertilizer coating layer 18 is applied
5 thereto as is common in the prior art. The biomaterial coating layer 14 is applied to
this fertilizer coating layer 18 by spraying, dripping or streaming the biomaterial on
to a rolling bed of fertilizer-coated nutrients core granules in a coating drum or
similar such mixing device as commonly used in the industry. The biomaterial may
also be sprayed onto the fertilizer coating layer 18 while the fertilizer-coated
10 nutrient core granules are carried in a fluidized bed. Alternatively, the biomaterial
coating layer 14 may be applied to the plant nutrient core 12 and subsequently
coated by the fertilizer coating layer 18, i.e., the layers 14 and 18 of Fig. 2 may be
switched.
[0058] In an embodiment of this invention, the fertilizer coating layer 18 is a
15 polyurethane coating consisting of at least on polyisocyanate containing no fewer
than 2 N=C=O moieties and at least one polyol containing no fewer than 2 OH
moieties. In yet other embodiments, the ratio of N=C=O functionality in said
polyisocyanate to OH functionality in said polyol is about 1:l. 1n still further
embodiments, the polyisocyanate and/or the polyol is mixed with a hydrocarbon wax
20 prior to being applied to the fertilizer. In some embodiments, the polyisocyanate and
the polyol components are added to a mixing vessel with the plant nutrient core and
allowed to react in-situ in a coating drum at elevated temperatures to coat the plant
nutrient core. In yet additional embodiments employing a polyurethane coating that
is reacted in-situ as just described, the core plant nutrient is urea, and the
. -
, 25 temperature of the mixing vessel including the urea and the polyurethane reagents is
maintained at between 50 and 100 "C.
[0059] In an embodiment of this invention, the fertilizer coating layer 18 is an
epoxy coating that consists of at least two components, one being the diglycidal ether
of bis-phenol A, and the other a polyamine or polyamide or derivative thereof. In yet
30 other embodiments, the epoxy resin contains at least 2 diglycidal ether moieties and
the polyamine contains at least two N-H moieties. In further embodiments, the ratio
of epoxide functionality to amine functionality is about 1:l.
[0060] In accordance with further embodiments, the diglycidal ether of bisphenol
A and the polyamine or polyamide are added separately to a mixing vessel
containing the plant nutrient core and allowed to react in-situ at elevated
temperatures. In still other embodiments of the in-situ coating process, chemically
5 active diluents or extenders can be added in order to enhance reactivity and/or
reduce the viscosity of the reactant monomers during the coating process. In
particular non-limiting embodiments, the chemically active modifiers are
polyacrylates. In yet other embodiments, the diglycidal ether of bis-phenol A and the
polyamine or polyamide are premixed prior to their addition to a mixing vessel
10 containing the core plant nutrient, and are allowed to react in-situ at elevated
temperatures. In some embodiments of the in-situ coating processes, the
temperature of the mixing vessel including the urea and the reactants is maintained
at between 50 and 100 "C.
[0061] In a separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
15 composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is urea, and the biomaterial coating layer
14 is derived as taught above.
[0062] In another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is ammonium sulfate, and the biomaterial
coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
20 [0063] In yet another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is ammonium nitrate, and the biomaterial
coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
[0064] In yet another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is ammonium sulfate-nitrate, and the
, 25 bioma,terial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
[0065] In yet another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is calcium nitrate or calcium ammonium
nitrate, and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
[0066] In yet another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
30 composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 is ammonium phosphate or derivatives
thereof including mono-ammonium phosphate, diammonium phosphate, triple super
phosphate and the like, and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught
above.
lo0671 In yet another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core 12 includes salts of potassium including
potassium chloride and potassium sulfate (often referred to as potash), and the
biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
5 [0068] In still another separate and distinct embodiment of a two-layer fertilizer
composition 10, the plant nutrient core is a complex fertilizer containing more than a
single nutrient composition, the complex fertilizer comprising two or more of
nutrients selected from nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and/or micronutrients
such as iron, manganese, and magnesium, and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is
10 derived as taught above. The complex fertilizers are also known as NPK's.
[0069] In a separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer fertilizer
composition 16, the plant nutrient core 12 is urea, the fertilizer coating layer 18 is
polyurethane, and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
[0070] In another separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer fertilizer
15 composition 16, the plant nutrient is urea, the fertilizer coating layer 18 is epoxy and
the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
[0071] In still another separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer
fertilizer composition 16, the plant nutrient is urea, the fertilizer coating later 18 is -
sulfur and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as taught above.
20 [0072] In still another separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer
fertilizer composition 16, the plant nutrient is ammonium sulfate, the fertilizer
coating layer 18 is PVC or plasticized PVC which may be modified with polyacrylates,
polyurethane or epoxy resins and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as .
taught above.
, 25 [007~] In still another separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer
fertilizer composition 16, the plant nutrient is urea, the fertilizer coating layer 18 is
sulfur followed by polyurethane and the biomaterial coating layer 14 is derived as
taught above.
[0074] In still another separate and distinct embodiment of a multi-layer
30 fertilizer composition 16, the plant nutrient core is a complex fertilizer containing
any combination of two or more compounds containing nitrogen, phosphorous and
potassium, as taught above plus any minor elements commonly used in fertilizer
formulations such as iron, magnesium and manganese; followed by a polymer
coating of epoxy or polyurethane and then the biomaterial 14 derived as taught
above.
[0075] It has been found that the biomaterial coating layer provides any one of a
number of beneficial properties to the two-layer and multi-layer fertilizer
5 compositions taught herein as compared to common fertilizer compositions of the
prior art, which do not contain the biomaterial coating layer. The biomaterial coating
layer imparts a slow or controlled release property to the fertilizer because it has
good film forming characteristics and does not break down quickly in the presence of
water, as in the case of water (or rain) being applied to the two-layer or multi-layer
10 fertilizer - this resistance to breaking down by water being improved upon by the
addition of polymer additives or waxes to enhance the hydrophobic nature. The
biomaterial coating layer also prevents or at least reduces the tendency of the
fertilizer particles to cake together because it coats the core plant nutrient, -- this
resistance to caking being improved upon by the addition of compatibilizing agents
15 such as stearic acid, which modify the biomaterial coating to provide a low friction
coating that is somewhat hydrophobic. Additionally, the biomaterial coating layer
prevents or at least reduces the tendency of the fertilizer particles to evolve dust by
fact that it provides a good complete film, and it has been found that dust particles
tend to stick to the biomaterial coating. The biomaterial coating layer also
20 unexpectedly provides its own controlled release nutrients to the soil as it breaks
down and/or dissolves and degrades.
[0076] When the two-layer or multi-layer fertilizer compositions are applied to
the ground to assist with the growing of vegetation, the biomaterial coating layer also
serves as a fertilizer, providing nutrients to the soil and thus the vegetation. The
, 25 bioherial coating layer is derived from animal waste, and, as such, includes various
compounds that are beneficial as plant nutrients. These are believed to include
nitrogen and phosphorous containing compounds, hydrocarbons and inorganic
minerals.
[0077] Example 1
[0078] Hog waste including excrements such as swine manure and urine and
shedding such as hair are collectively stored in a pit beneath a hog confinement area,
such waste further including the rinse water from cleaning the areas of confinement.
This waste is subjected to a number of processing steps including screening, particle
5 size reduction, solids content control, purification, pyrolysis, fine filtration and drying
to provide a biomaterial as disclosed herein above. Pyrolysis occurs for a period of
time 1.5 hours at a pressure maintained around 1600 psi and a temperature range
maintained around 300°C. The resulting filtered and dried biomaterial has a final
moisture content of less than 5 percent, a particle size via sieve analysis of +200
10 mesh. Elementally, the biomaterial is comprised principally of carbon and hydrogen
along with lesser amounts of sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorous.
[0079] Example 2
[0080] 180 grams of biomaterial from Example 1, is heated to a temperature of
15 300 degrees Fahrenheit in a 600 mL insulated glass beaker. While vigorously stirring
with an overhead paddle mixer at 100 rpm, 25 grams of hydrogenated tallow amine
and 75 grams of ethylene vinyl acetate (Elvax 205W) are sequentially added. This
composition represents a product that can be used as a sealant coating for polymer
or sulfur coated fertilizers.
20
[0081] Example 3
[0082] 95 grams of biomaterial of Example 1 is heated to a temperature of 250
degrees Fahrenheit in a 250 mL glass beaker. While moderately stirring with an
overhead paddle mixer 5 grams of hydrogenated tallow amine is added to the beaker
, 25 and d e d for 15 minutes. This composition represents a product that can be used as
a dust control coating agent for granular fertilizers.
[0083] Example 4
[0084] 220 grams of biomaterial of Example 1 is heated to a temperature of 320
30 degrees Fahrenheit before being loaded into a 600 mL insulated round bottom 4 neck
glass reaction flask. To its four protruding necks, the flask is fitted with (1) a water
cooled reflux column, (2) an overhead direct drive mixer and (3) a solid feed addition
hopper and (4) a thermometer. The solid feed hopper is filled first with 25 grams of
hydrogenated tallow amine and then with 105 grams of Ethylene Vinyl Acetate
copolymer in bead form (Elvax 205W) having a melt flow index of 800 and a vinyl
acetate content of 28. Under mild agitation the HTA is added quickly to the
biologically derived resin resulting in a lower viscosity composition. Next, the EVA is
5 gradually added to the reaction vessel until it has all dissolved and dispersed into the
biologically derived resin. As the EVA is added and subsequently dispersed the resin
becomes much thicker thus requiring additional mixing speed in order to adequately
disperse the polymer. Stirring is continued,until the composition is shown to be
completely homogeneous which constitutes a time period of about 1 hour. This
10 composition represents a slow release coating for granular fertilizers.
[0085] - Example 5
[0086] 500 grams of granular urea is heated to 150 degrees Fahrenheit in an 18
inch diameter by 5 inch wide rotating stainless steel drum equipped with 2 inch tall
15 lifting flights positioned each 20 degrees of internal circumferencs. To the falling
curtain of urea is sprayed liquid elemental sulfur at a temperature of between 275
and 300 degrees Fahrenheit using a pressurized holding tank and a heated air
atomizing nozzle. A spray rate of between 45 and 60 grams per minute is continued
until the urea has been uniformly coated with about 13 percent sulfur. The resultant
20 product is sulfur-coated urea. -
I00871 Example 6
[0088] 500 grams of granular urea is heated to 190 degrees Fahrenheit in an 18
inch diameter by 5 inch wide rotating stainless steel drum equipped with
, 25 polycarbonate plow and inverse plow type mixing flights attached to a polycarbonate
liner. To a 50 mL glass beaker is carefully weighed and then thoroughly mixed, 12
grams of diglycidal ether of "Bisphenol A epoxy resin (Epotuf 37-139) and 8 grams
of a polyamide curing agent (Versamid 140) sourced from Reichold Chemical and
Henkel Chemical respectively. During moderate rotation of the coating drum or
30 about 8 revolutions per minute, 5 grams of the pre-polymer mix is added uniformly
across the mixing bed of urea where is gradually disperses and cures forming a hard
continubus film on the urea particles. This process is repeated a second time thus
forming a two layer epoxy coating on the urea.
[0089] Example 7
[0090] 250 grams of the sulfur coated urea (SCU) from example 5 is preheated to
200 degrees Fahrenheit and placed in a preheated stainless drum that is 12 inChe*
5 diameter and 4 inches in width and equipped with 4 sets of mixing plows and inverse
plows. While rotating the drum at 12 revolutions per minute 6 grams of the coating
agent fro..m- ex- a.m ple 1i s heated to 300 degrees F and gradually streamed across the
mixing bed of SCU. Mixing and heating (21.0 F) are maintained until the sealant
coating is completely and uniformly dispersed along the surface area of the SCU thus
10 forming an encapsulation coating. Heat is removed and the SCU product cooled after
transferring to an air cooled vibrating chamber. The resultant product is a controlled
release sulfur coated urea with an abrasion resistant nutrient bearing renewable
resource sealant coating.
15 [0091] Example 8
[0092] 250 grams of the epoxy coated urea (ECU) from example 6 is preheated to
210 degrees Fahrenheit and placed in a preheated stainless drum that is 12 inches in
diameter and 4 inches in width and equipped with 4 sets of mixing plows and inverse
plows. While rotating the drum at 12 revolutions per minute 4.5 grams of the coating
20 agent from example 2 is heated to 300 degrees F and gradually streamed across the
mixing bed of ECU. Mixing and heating (210 F) are maintained until the sealant
coating is completely and uniformly dispersed along the surface area of the ECU thus
forming an encapsulation coating. Heat is removed and the ECU product cooled after'
transferring to an air cooled vibrating chamber. The resultant product is a controlled
, 25 release epoxy coated urea fertilizer with an abrasion resistant nutrient bearing
renewable resource sealant coating.
[0093] Example 9
[0094] 460 grams of granular urea is heated to 120 degrees Fahrenheit in an 18
30 inch diameter by 5 inch wide rotating stainless steel drum equipped with 2 inch tall
lifting flights positioned each 20 degrees of internal circumference. The drum is
located within the confines of a fume hood. To the falling curtain of urea is sprayed
40 grams of the composition of example 4 preheated to 350 degrees F using a heated
pressure pot feeding an air atomized heated spray nozzle. All spraying equipment is
temperature controlled using PID controllers, strategically located thermocouples
and a combination of internal and external heaters. The composition of example 3 is
sprayed at a rate of between 5 and 10 grams per minute thereby forming an
5 approximately 8 percent encapsulation coating on the granular urea. The resultant
product is a nutrient bearing, renewable resource, slow release fertilizer.

CLAIMS
10 1. A fertilizer composition comprising:
a plant nutrient core containing at least one water soluble plant
nutrient; and
a biomaterial coating layer including a biomaterial derived from animal
waste.
15
2. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein said biomaterial is produced by
subjecting animal waste to a pyrolysis reaction.
3. The fertilizer composition of claim 2, wherein said biomaterial is produced by
20 subjecting said animal waste to a pressure of from 100 to 12,400:KPa and a
temperature of from 100 to 500 "C in the absence of oxygen for a period of
time no less than 5 minutes.
4. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein said animal waste is sourced
, 25 -from manure.
5. The fertilizer composition of claim 4, wherein said manure is sourced from
one or more of swine manure, cow manure, horse manure, lamb manure, goat
manure, chicken manure, and human manure.
6. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, including from 0.01 to 25 % by weight of
said biomaterial coating layer.
7. The fertilizer composition of claim 6, including from 1 to 10 % by weight of
said biomaterial coating layer.
8. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, wherein said biomaterial coating layer
includes one or more of polymers, compatibilizing agents, resins, extenders,
odor modifiers, and fillers.
9. The fertilizer composition of claim 8, wherein said biomaterial coating layer
includes from 1 to 99% by weight of said biomaterial and from 99 to 1% by
weight of said polymers, compatibilizing agents, resins, extenders, modifiers,
and fillers.
10. The fertilizer of claim 8 wherein the polymers include at least one of the
following polymers, copolymers or terpolymers selected from polyvinyl
chloride, polyvinyl vinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, copolymers of ethylene
and vinyl acetate, copolymers of styrene and butadiene, copolymers of styrene
and isoprene, terpolymers of ethylene, vinyl acetate and acrylic acid.
11. The fertilizer of claim 8 wherein the compatibilizing agent is selected from
20 hydrocarbon chains containing at least one amine functionality, and
hydrocarbon chains containing at least one carboxylic acid functionality.
12. The fertilizer' composition of claim 1, wherein said core plant nutrient is
selected from urea, ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, ammonium
- - 25 -sulfate-nitrate, calcium nitrate, calcium ammonium nitrate, ammonium
phosphate, mono-ammonium phosphate, di-ammonium phosphate, triple
super phosphate, and potassium compounds and mixtures thereof.
13. The fertilizer composition of claim 1, further comprising a fertilizer coating
30 layer.
14. The fertilizer composition' of claim 11 wherein said fertilizer coating layer is
positioned between said biomaterial coating layer and said plant nutrient core
component. .
5 15. The fertilizer composition of claim 12, wherein said fertilizer coating layer is
selected from polyurethanes, epoxies, polyacrylates, polyvinyldene chloride,
sulfur, polyvinyl chlorides (PVC) and-combinations thereof.
I
16. The composition of claim 12, including from 0.5 to 25 % by weight of said
10 fertilizer coating layer.
17. The fertilizer composition of claim 14, wherein said fertilizer coating layer is a
sulfur coating.
15 18. The fertilizer composition of claim 14, wherein the fertilizer coating layer is a
polyurethane coating.