OVERLOAD CONTROL IN A PACKET MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
The present invention generally relates to mobile communication networks
and systems.
Detailed descriptions of mobile communication networks and systems can
be found in the literature, such as in particular Technical Specifications published by
standardisation bodies such as for example 3GPP (3 rd Generation Partnership
Project).
In such systems, a mobile terminal o r User Equipment (UE) has access to
mobile services (such as in particular IP-based mobile services) via a n Access Network
(such as in particular packet-based Access Network) comprising a Radio Access
Network (RAN) and a Core Network (CN).
Examples of 3GPP-based mobile communication systems include 2G
GSM/GPRS, 3G UMTS, LTE also known as EPS (Evolved Packet System). Examples of
Radio Access Network (RAN) include GERAN (for 2G GSM/GPRS), UTRAN (for 3G
UMTS), E-UTRAN (for LTE). Examples of packet Core Network include GPRS Core (for
2G o r 3G) and Evolved Packet Core EPC (for 2G, 3G UTRAN and LTE).
For example, EPS architecture is recalled in figure 1, taken from 3GPP TS
23.401 . Within EPS, EPC may be accessed via E-UTRAN o r via UTRAN/GERAN. EPC
comprises entities such as MME (Mobility Management Entity), SGSN (Serving GPRS
Support Node) supporting a n S4 interface to a SGW and thus called S4-SGSN, SGW
(Serving Gateway) and PGW (Packet Data Network PDN Gateway). MME interfaces
with E-UTRAN in the control plane via SI -MME interface. S4-SGSN interfaces with
UTRAN/GERAN in the control plane via the lu/Gb interface respectively. SGW
interfaces with MME/S4-SGSN in the control plane via SI 1/S4 interface respectively.
SGW interfaces with E-UTRAN in the user plane via Sl -U interface. SGW interfaces
with UTRAN in the user plane via SI 2 interface. SGW interfaces with PGW in the user
plane via S5/S8 interface.
In such systems, a problem is that a number of mobile terminals o r
applications may simultaneously require communication network resources, which
may induce a congestion o r overflow of network resources, which may have serious
consequences as the system may no longer be able to work properly. In particular, in
a system such as EPS for example, Core Network entities such as MME/S4-SGSN, in
charge of a number of functions related to communication network resources control,
may become congested o r overloaded.
This problem is becoming increasingly important in particular with the
introduction in mobile networks of Machine to Machine (M2M) communication, also
called Machine Type Communication MTC, for example as currently specified by
standardization bodies such as 3GPP. As illustrated in figure 2 taken from 3GPP TS
22.368, a n UE equipped for Machine Type Communication, also called MTC Device,
communicates through a mobile network (operator domain) with MTC Server(s)
and/or other MTC Device(s).
With the introduction in mobile networks of M2M o r MTC type of
applications, there is the risk that a huge number of terminals o r MTC Devices o r
MTC applications simultaneously require communication network resources, thus
significantly increasing the risk of congestion o r overload.
There is a need to provide overload control in such systems, particularly
(though not exclusively) for M2M communication.
These and other objects are achieved, in one aspect of the present invention,
in a n embodiment, by a method for overload control in a packet mobile
communication system, said method comprising a step of:
- in case of overload, throttling downlink traffic received for mobile terminals
in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal o r to a mobile terminal
connection declared as candidate for throttling.
These and other objects are achieved in other aspects of the present
invention, by entities such as in particular Core Network entities of a packet mobile
communication system, comprising means for carrying out such method. Such entities
may include in particular MME/ S4- SGSN and SGW for EPS, o r SGSN (also called
Gn-SGSN as they support the Gn interface with a GGSN) and GGSN for
GPRS/UMTS.
These and other objects of the present invention will become more apparent
from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
- figure 1 is intended to illustrate EPS architecture,
- figure 2 is intended to illustrate introduction of MTC in mobile networks,
- figure 3 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of EPS and E-UTRAN access to
EPC,
- figure 4 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of EPS and UTRAN/GERAN access
to EPC,
- figure 5 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of GPRS/UMTS.
In embodiments of the present invention described hereinafter, MTC will
more particularly be considered, as a n example to which the present invention
applies. However the present invention is not limited to such example.
In embodiments of the present invention described hereinafter, the case of
EPS will mainly be considered. However the present invention is not limited to such
example. For example, the present invention also applies to GPRS/UMTS.
As indicated above, one problem, with the introduction in mobile networks
of applications such as M2M or MTC, is the risk that a huge number of mobile
terminals (referred to as MTC Device) or MTC applications simultaneously require
communication network resources, thus significantly increasing the risk of congestion
or overload.
In particular, one problem is the risk that a huge number of mobile
terminals in idle mode simultaneously need to become active again for DownLink
(DL) traffic, in which case Core Network entities such as MME or S4-SGSN (in charge
of a number of functions, including functions related to the network triggered service
request procedure to be performed in such case for transition of the mobile EPS
Connection Management state from ECM-ldle to ECM-Connected) may become
overloaded.
The network triggered service request procedure in particular includes the
following steps:
- Upon receipt of DL traffic towards an UE in idle mode, SGW sends a
Downlink Data Notification message to MME/S4-SGSN,
- MME/S4-SGSN responds to SGW with a Downlink Data Notification Ack
message,
- MME/S4-SGSN sends a Paging message to the eNodeB(s)/RNC(s)/BSS(s)
belonging to the Tracking Area(s)/Routing Area(s) in which the UE is registered.
- An UE triggered service request procedure may then be performed. During
this UE triggered service request, many signaling messages need to be exchanged
back and forth between the mobile and the MME/S4-SGSN.
All these steps consume signaling capacity in the MME/S4-SGSN and in case
of congestion of an MME/S4-SGSN, there is the need to avoid those steps when the
DL traffic that triggers those steps corresponds to low priority traffic such as most of
the M2M related traffic.
A possible approach for solving the above-mentioned problem could be as
follows.
Upon receipt of DL MTC traffic towards a MTC device in idle mode, the
SGW sends a Downlink Data Notification message to the MME/S4-SGSN, for this
MTC Device. An MME/S4-SGSN under overload conditions might decide to reject the
request from the SGW instead of triggering a network-initiated service request
towards the UE, based on the knowledge that this is an MTC PDN connection.
However, such approach would not allow to decrease the signaling traffic o n
the SI 1 and S4 interfaces (i.e. between SGW and respectively MME and S4-SGSN)
induced by MTC traffic. This would still require the MME/S4-SGSN (under overload)
to process and answer to Downlink Data Notification messages received for MTC
traffic, thus still implying processing load on the MME/S4-SGSN. Thus, an MME or
S4-SGSN overload that would result from a peak of MTC traffic would affect all the
traffic of the operator. This is exactly what operators do not want as they want to be
able, at peak hours or when a MME/S4-SGSN starts experiencing congestion, to
throttle or to forbid only MTC traffic, thus providing a kind of precedence to regular
traffic (not throttled or forbidden) with regard to MTC traffic (throttled or forbidden).
Thus, there is a need for a different approach that would enable to avoid
part o r all of such drawbacks. More generally there is a need to improve congestion
or overload control in mobile networks.
Embodiments of the present invention described hereinafter in particular
address such needs.
In an embodiment, the EPC and GPRS Core network (MME and SGSN) when
in overload should be allowed to reduce the DL signalling load generated by
Machine to Machine applications, or even outside overload conditions in periods of
time during which the network is not prepared to accept increase of traffic for MTC
communications (e.g. during busy hours).
In an embodiment, an MME or SGSN starting to experience overload
should be able to trigger partial or complete throttling of the signalling traffic
generated by MTC devices/applications while still allowing normal operations for the
existing non-MTC traffic (e.g. voice, data, signalling).
In an embodiment, a n MME or S4-SGSN starting to experience overload
should be able to request the SGWs to throttle DL MTC traffic received for devices in
idle mode, i.e. traffic for which the SGW would normally send a Downlink Data
Notification message to the MME/S4-SGSN to trigger a network-initiated service
request procedure.
Throttling of the DL MTC signalling traffic should take place at the closest
point to the source of the traffic.
In an embodiment, - DL MTC traffic received for MTC devices in ECM-ldle
state or PMM-ldle mode is throttled, i.e. traffic for which the SGW would normally
send a Downlink Data Notification message to the MME/S4-SGSN to trigger a
network-initiated service request procedure.
Figure 3 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of EPS and E-UTRAN access to
EPC.
An MME starting to experience overload (i.e. whose load exceeds a threshold
to start MTC traffic throttling) may reduce its load by requesting the SGW to throttle
DL MTC traffic for MTC devices in idle mode according to a throttling factor (%) and
for a throttling delay specified in the request. Such request may be sent e.g. within the
Downlink Data Notification Ack message.
During that throttling delay, the SGW drops DL packets received on an MTC
PDN connection served by that MME and without an SI bearer, in proportion to the
throttling factor, and sends a Downlink Data Notification message to the MME only
for the non throttled DL packets.
The SGW resumes normal operations at the expiry of the throttling delay.
The last received value of the MTC throttling factor and throttling delay supersedes
any previous values received from that MME. The reception of an "MTC throttling
delay" restarts the SGW timer associated with that MME.
When dropping a DL IP packets, the SGW may send an ICMP packet (e.g.
ICMP "destination un-reachable") in the UL data flow of the PDN connection that
should tell the source of the DL IP packet having been dropped that there is no use in
repeating the packet.
The MME may signal to the SGW, when setting up a PDN connection,
whether the PDN connection is for MTC traffic or not.
Figure 4 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of EPS and UTRAN/GERAN access
to EPC.
Figure 4 is similar to figure 3, MME being replaced by S4-SGN, and eNB
being replaced by RNC/BSS.
Figure 5 is intended to illustrate DL MTC traffic reduction according to an
embodiment of the present invention, for the case of GPRS/UMTS.
In figure 5, an SGSN, also called Gn-SGSN, starting to experience overload
(i.e. whose load exceeds a threshold to start MTC traffic throttling) may reduce its
load by throttling DL MTC traffic for MTC devices in idle mode according to a
throttling factor (%) and for a throttling delay.
During that throttling delay, the Gn-SGSN drops DL packets received on an
MTC PDP context served by that Gn-SGSN and without a radio and lu bearer, in
proportion to the throttling factor, and sends a Paging message to the RNC/BSS only
for the non throttled DL packets.
The Gn-SGSN resumes normal operations at the expiry of the throttling
delay. The Gn-SGSN may decide to apply different MTC throttling factor and
throttling delay values at any point in time.
When dropping a DL IP packets, the Gn-SGSN may send in the UL data flow
of the PDP context an ICMP packet (e.g. ICMP "destination un-reachable") that should
tell the source of the DL IP packet having ben dropped that there is no use in
repeating the packet.
The Gn-SGSN can know, when setting up the PDP context, whether the PDP
context is for MTC traffic or not.
As indicated above, the present invention is not limited to MTC.
For example, more generally, the MME/S4-SGSN may signal during the
setup of a PDN connection whether this PDN connection (whatever it is used for) is
candidate or not for throttling, or the MME/S4-SGSN may signal when activating
throttling the highest ARP (Allocation Retention Priority) priority for which DL traffic
should be throttled. The SGW would throttle only PDN connections candidate for
throttling, or only DL traffic received on bearers with an ARP priority lower than the
ARP priority signalled by the MME/S4-SGSN. Specific throttling of DL MTC traffic
could then be achieved by only marking MTC PDN connections as candidate for
throttling, or by allocating a specific low ARP priority to MTC traffic. This would also
allow to throttle certain MTC traffic while maintaining normal operations for some
higher priority MTC traffic.
In one aspect, in an embodiment, the present invention provides a method
for overload control in a packet mobile communication system, said method
comprising a step of:
- in case of overload, throttling downlink traffic received for mobile terminals
in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal
connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- in case of overload at a Core Network entity, referred to as first entity,
interfacing with the Radio Access Network in the control plane, and with a Core
Network entity, referred to as second entity, in the control plane, said first entity
requesting said second entity to throttle said downlink traffic.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said first entity requesting said second entity to throttle said downlink traffic,
according to a throttling factor.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said first entity requesting said second entity to throttle said downlink traffic,
for a throttling delay.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- upon reception of said request, said second entity dropping downlink
packets received for said mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a
mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said second entity informing a Core Network entity, referred to as third
entity, interfacing with said second entity in the user plane, of said dropping.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said second entity sending to said third entity an ICMP "destination u n
reachable" message.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- upon reception of said request, said second entity sending Downlink
signalling to said first entity for mobile terminals in idle mode, only for mobile
terminals or for mobile connections that are not candidate for throttling or for a
proportion below a throttling factor of the traffic associated with mobile terminals or
with mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said first entity signalling to said second entity if a mobile terminal or a
mobile terminal connection is candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said first entity signalling to said second entity if a mobile terminal or a
mobile terminal connection is candidate for throttling, when setting up a packet
connection.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME starting to experience overload requesting a SGW to
throttle downlink traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to
a mobile terminalor to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME starting to experience overload requesting a SGW to
throttle downlink traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to
a mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling, according to a throttling factor specified in the request.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME starting to experience overload requesting a SGW to
throttle downlink traffic for terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a
mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling, for a throttling delay specified in the request.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME starting to experience overload requesting a SGW to
throttle downlink traffic for terminals in idle mode and when this traffic belongs to a
mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling, within a Downlink Data Notification Acknowledge message.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- upon reception from a S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle downlink
traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal
or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling, a SGW
dropping Downlink packets received for said mobile terminals or bearers.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- SGW informing the source of the DL IP packet that has been dropped of
said dropping.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- SGW informing the source of the DL IP packet that has been dropped of
said dropping via an ICMP "destination un-reachable" message sent UL via the PGW.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- upon reception from a S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle downlink
traffic for a mobile terminal in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile
terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling, a
SGW sending a Donlink Data Notification message to the S4-SGSN/MME only for
non throttled Downlink packets.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- upon reception from a S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle downlink
traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal
or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling, including a
throttling delay, a SGW resuming normal operation at the expiry of the throttling
delay.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a MME/S4-SGSN signalling to a SGW whether a PDN connection is setup
for a mobile terminal or for a mobile terminal connection candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- in case of overload at a Core Network entity, referred to as fourth entity,
interfacing with the Radio Access Network in the control plane and with a Core
Network entity referred to as fifth entity in the user plane, said fourth entity throttling
said downlink traffic when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal or to a mobile
terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said fourth entity throttling said downlink traffic, according to a throttling
factor.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said fourth entity throttling said downlink traffic, for a throttling delay.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said fourth entity sending Downlink signalling for mobile terminals in idle
mode, only if said mobile terminals or mobile terminal connections are not candidate
for throttling or for a proportion below a throttling factor of the traffic associated with
mobile terminals or with mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said fourth entity informing said fifth entity, of said dropping.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- said fourth entity sending to said fifth entity an ICMP "destination u n
reachable" message.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a Gn-SGSN starting to experience overload throttling downlink traffic for
terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal or to a mobile
terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a Gn-SGSN starting to experience overload throttling said downlink traffic ,
according to a throttling factor.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a Gn-SGSN starting to experience overload throttling said downlink traffic ,
for a throttling delay.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a Gn-SGSN starling to experience overload dropping Downlink packets
received for mobile terminals in idle mode when said traffic belongs to a mobile
terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- Gn-SGSN informing the source of the DL IP packet that has been dropped
of said dropping.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- Gn-SGSN informing the source of the DL IP packet that has been dropped
of said dropping via an ICMP "destination un-reachable" message sent UL via the
GGSN.
In an embodiment, said method comprises a step of:
- a Gn-SGSN starting to experience overload sending Downlink signalling
for mobile terminals in idle mode, only for mobile terminals o r for mobile terminal
connections that are not candidate for throttling or for a proportion below a throttling
factor of the traffic associated with mobile terminals or with mobile terminal
connection declared as candidate for throttling.
In an embodiment, mobile terminals candidate for throttling include
Machine Type Communication MTC devices.
In an embodiment, mobile terminals candidate for throttling include mobile
terminals having a low priority level for allocation of resources.
In an embodiment, said priority level is given by QoS parameter Allocation
Retention Priority ARP.
In other aspects, the present invention provides entities such as in particular
Core Network entities of a mobile communication system, for carrying out such
method, such as in particular MME/ S4- SGSN and SGW for EPS, or SGSN and
GGSN for GPRS/UMTS.
The detailed implementation of the above-mentioned means does not raise
any special problem for a person skilled in the art, and therefore such means do not
need to be more fully disclosed than has been made above, by their function, for a
person skilled in the art.
A person of skill in the art would readily recognize that steps of various
above-described methods can be performed by programmed computers. Herein,
some embodiments are also intended to cover program storage devices, e.g., digital
data storage media, which are machine or computer readable and encode machineexecutable
or computer-executable programs of instructions, wherein said instructions
perform some or all of the steps of said above-described methods. The program
storage devices may be, e.g., digital memories, magnetic storage media such as a
magnetic disks and magnetic tapes, hard drives, or optically readable digital data
storage media. The embodiments are also intended to cover computers
programmed to perform said steps of the above-described methods.
CLAIMS
1. A method for overload control in a packet mobile communication system,
said method comprising a step of:
- in case of overload, throttling downlink traffic received for mobile terminals
in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal
connection declared as candidate for throttling.
2. A method according to claim 1, comprising a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or a MME starting to experience overload requesting a SGW to
throttle said downlink traffic.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, comprising a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME requesting a SGW to throttle said downlink traffic ,
according to a throttling factor specified in the request.
4 . A method according to any of claims 1 to 3, comprising a step of:
- a S4-SGSN or MME requesting a SGW to throttle said downlink traffic, for
a throttling delay specified in the request.
5. A method according to claim 1 to 4, comprising a step of:
- S4-SGSN or MME requesting SGW to throttle said downlink traffic, within
a Downlink Data Notification Acknowledge message.
6. A method according to any of claims 1 to 5, comprising a step of:
- upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle said
downlink traffic, SGW dropping Downlink packets received for said mobile terminals
or bearers.
7. A method according to any of claims 1 to 6, comprising a step of:
- upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle said
downlink traffic specifying a throttling factor, SGW dropping Downlink packets
received for said mobile terminals or bearers, in proportion to the throttling factor.
8. A method according to any of claims 1 to 7, comprising a step of:
- upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle said
downlink traffic, SGW sending a Downlink Data Notification message to S4-SGSN or
MME only for non throttled Downlink packets.
9. A method according to any of claims 1 to 8, comprising a step of:
- upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle said
downlink traffic specifying a throttling delay, SGW resuming normal operation at the
expiry of the throttling delay.
10. A method according to any of claims 1 to 9, comprising a step of:
- the last received value of a throttling factor and throttling delay
superseding any previous values received from that S4-SGSN or MME.
11. A method according to any of claims 1 to 10, comprising a step of:
- the reception of a throttling delay restarting a SGW timer associated with
that S4-SGSN or MME.
12. A method according to any of claims 1 to 11, wherein said traffic
corresponds to low priority traffic.
13. A method according to any of claims 1 to 12, wherein said traffic
corresponds to Machine Type Communication MTC traffic.
14 . A method according to any of claims 1 to 13, wherein said said traffic
corresponds to traffic having a low Allocation Retention Priority ARP.
15. A S4-SGSN or a MME, comprising:
- means for, when starting to experience overload, requesting a SGW to
throttle downlink traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to
a mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling.
16. A S4-SGSN or a MME according to claim 15, comprising:
- means for requesting a SGW to throttle said downlink traffic, according to
a throttling factor specified in the request.
17. A S4-SGSN or a MME according to claim 15 or 16, comprising:
- means for requesting a SGW to throttle said downlink traffic, for a
throttling delay specified in the request.
18. A S4-SGSN or MME according to any of claims 15 to 17, comprising:
- means for requesting SGW to throttle said downlink traffic, within a
Downlink Data Notification Acknowledge message.
19. S4-SGSN or MME according to any of claims 15 to 18, wherein said
traffic corresponds to low priority traffic.
20. S4-SGSN or MME according to any of claims 15 to 19, wherein said
traffic corresponds to Machine Type Communication MTC traffic.
2 1. S4-SGSN or MME according to any of claims 15 to 20, wherein said
traffic corresponds to traffic having a low Allocation Retention Priority ARP.
22. A SGW, comprising:
- means for, upon reception from a S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle
downlink traffic for mobile terminals in idle mode when this traffic belongs to a
mobile terminal or to a mobile terminal connection declared as candidate for
throttling, dropping Downlink packets received for said mobile terminals or bearers.
23. A SGW according to claim 22, comprising:
- means for, upon reception from a S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle
said downlink traffic according to a throttling factor specified in the request, dropping
Downlink packets received for said mobile terminals or bearers, in proportion to the
throttling factor.
24. SGW according to claim 22 or 23, comprising:
- means for, upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle
said downlink traffic, sending a Downlink Data Notification message to S4-SGSN or
MME only for non throttled Downlink packets.
25. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 24, comprising:
- means for, upon reception from S4-SGSN or MME of a request to throttle
said downlink traffic according to a throttling delay specified in the request, resuming
normal operation at the expiry of the throttling delay.
26. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 25, wherein:
- the last received value of a throttling factor and throttling delay supersedes
any previous values received from that S4-SGSN or MME.
27. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 26, wherein:
- the reception of a throttling delay restarts a SGW timer associated with that
S4-SGSN or MME.
28. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 27, wherein said traffic
corresponds to low priority traffic.
29. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 28, wherein said low priority
traffic corresponds to Machine Type Communication MTC traffic.
30. SGW according to any of claims 22 to 29, wherein said traffic
corresponds to traffic having a low Allocation Retention Priority ARP.