Description:FIELD OF INVENTION
The field of invention is static voltage stability analysis in power systems, specifically focusing on the performance evaluation of static methods when considering induction motor loads. This involves analyzing how induction motor loads impact voltage stability, identifying potential instability issues, and developing strategies to enhance the robustness and reliability of power system operations.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Voltage stability in power systems is a critical aspect of maintaining reliable and secure electricity supply. Induction motors, which are widely used in industrial and commercial applications, play a significant role in the overall load composition of power systems. The dynamic characteristics of induction motors can significantly impact voltage stability, particularly under conditions of stress or disturbances. Historically, static voltage stability analysis has been employed to assess the ability of a power system to maintain acceptable voltage levels under steady-state conditions. This method involves the examination of power flow solutions and the identification of critical points, such as voltage collapse points, using techniques like the continuation power flow method. While effective for a general overview, traditional static analysis often overlooks the dynamic behaviors of certain loads, such as induction motors, which can exhibit complex, nonlinear interactions with the power system. Induction motors, being asynchronous machines, have a distinct set of operational characteristics, including torque-slip relationships and varying reactive power demands. When subjected to voltage dips, these motors can exhibit behaviors such as stalling, leading to increased reactive power consumption and potential voltage instability. Therefore, incorporating the characteristics of induction motor loads into static voltage stability analysis provides a more realistic and comprehensive assessment of system stability. The innovation in this field involves integrating the dynamic modeling of induction motors into static voltage stability frameworks. This approach enhances the accuracy of stability predictions by accounting for the transient and steady-state responses of induction motors during voltage disturbances. By doing so, power system operators and planners can better anticipate and mitigate potential voltage stability issues, ensuring a more resilient and reliable power grid. This integration is crucial for modern power systems, where the proportion of motor loads is significant, and the reliability of voltage stability assessments directly impacts the overall system performance.
The patent application number 201911024165 discloses a single stage solar pv array fed induction motor drive water pumping system.
The patent application number 202014005353 discloses a squirrel-cage induction motor and squirrel-cage rotor.
The patent application number 202131012791 discloses a sealing arrangement in three-phase induction traction motor for ac loco.
The patent application number 202217019932 discloses a induction voltage-based control of a sensor network.
The patent application number 202347001973 discloses a static electric induction arrangement.
SUMMARY
The invention focuses on the performance analysis of static voltage stability considering induction motor loads within power systems. Voltage stability is a critical aspect ensuring the reliable operation of electrical networks, particularly under varying load conditions. This analysis evaluates the system's ability to maintain steady voltage levels when subjected to disturbances or changes in load.
Induction motors, commonly used in industrial and commercial applications, represent a significant portion of the load in many power systems. These motors are known for their sensitivity to voltage fluctuations, which can lead to voltage instability, especially during high demand periods or fault conditions. The static voltage stability analysis in this context involves assessing the system's behavior under steady-state conditions, taking into account the dynamic characteristics of induction motor loads.
Key aspects of this analysis include:
1. Load Modeling: Accurately representing the induction motor loads within the power system model. This involves characterizing their voltage-current characteristics and load-dependence.
2. Power Flow Studies: Conducting power flow analyses to determine voltage profiles and identify weak points in the network that are susceptible to voltage instability.
3. Stability Margins: Calculating voltage stability margins to understand how close the system operates to its voltage stability limits. This helps in identifying potential risks and taking preventive measures.
4. Impact Assessment: Evaluating how different levels of induction motor penetration affect overall system stability. This involves scenario analysis under various loading conditions.
By focusing on these aspects, the invention provides insights into enhancing voltage stability in power systems with significant induction motor loads. It aids in developing strategies for load management, system reinforcement, and ensuring the reliability of power supply under diverse operating conditions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Induction Motors (IMs) Load Characteristics and Power System Stability
Induction motors (IMs) significantly influence power system stability, but accurately modeling loads is complex due to the diverse devices represented at a typical load bus in stability studies. To enhance the accuracy of modeling IMs with pump loads in distribution networks, a load model for IMs has been developed, focusing on the static voltage stability of distribution networks. This paper proposes a new aggregation algorithm for IM groups, analyzing the impact on voltage recovery and transient voltage instability. It simplifies load representation in power system studies and addresses the computational challenges of applying dynamic models to numerous load buses in large-scale power grids. The paper also discusses the influence of negative-sequence components on IM rotor torque under asymmetrical voltage sags, highlighting the limitations of current simulation methods and proposing an improved analytical method for calculating transient responses of perturbed IMs. Load characteristics of induction motors (IMs) play a crucial role in power system stability. However, modeling loads accurately is challenging due to the large number of devices represented at a typical load bus in stability studies. This paper aims to improve the accuracy of modeling IMs with pump loads in distribution networks by proposing a new aggregation algorithm for IM groups and analyzing the influence on voltage recovery. The transient voltage instability and network apparent power transmission characteristics are also examined.
Review on Modeling of Induction Motors
IMs constitute a significant portion of system loads, making their modeling essential for system analysis. The steady-state performance of IMs is represented by an equivalent circuit (Fig. 1), accounting for quantities in one phase.

Figure 1: Steady state equivalent circuit of induction motor
Key Parameters:
• Voltage (Vs)
• Currents (Is)
• Conjugate Quantities (Vs, Is)
Proposed Analytical Model and Method
The proposed analytical method calculates the transient responses of perturbed IMs using algebraic expressions, which are faster than solving differential and algebraic equations simultaneously in time-domain simulations. This method includes the influence of negative-sequence voltage under asymmetrical faults, offering a more accurate reflection of IM dynamics.
Advantages:
• Faster calculations
• Inclusion of negative-sequence voltage effect.

Verification Through Simulation
The developed analytical method is implemented in MATLAB and verified through electromagnetic transient simulations using the PSACD/EMTDC package. The feasibility of applying this method in power system electromechanical transient simulations is demonstrated by analyzing IM responses to balanced and unbalanced faults.
Analysis of Analytical Method
The analytical method shows high accuracy in calculating active power but low precision in calculating reactive power, particularly in the context of transient responses. This method overcomes some limitations of previous analytical approaches, offering more accurate calculations of state variables such as stator voltage, current, slip, and power. An improved analytical method for calculating the transient responses of IMs is presented, providing faster and more accurate simulations for power system stability studies. The method's effectiveness is verified through simulations, highlighting its potential application in large-scale power grids with high IM penetrations.
The dynamic performance of Induction Motors (IMs) is critical for accurate system analysis, particularly when using complex models such as the five-order model. This model considers stator and rotor circuit transients along with rotor speed transients, providing high precision for simulations in software like PSCAD/EMTDC.
For power system stability studies, a simplified approach neglecting stator transients is often adopted. This simplification results in a more manageable model while retaining essential dynamic characteristics. The relationship between the stator voltage and current in this simplified model can be represented using the transient reactance X′ and the transient voltage E′.
The parameters involved are:
• Vs: Stator terminal voltage
• s: Rotor slip
• Rs: Stator winding resistance
• Xs: Stator leakage reactance
• Rr: Rotor winding resistance
• Xr: Rotor leakage reactance
• Xm: Magnetizing reactance
• Is: Stator current
• : Transient reactance of the IM
• E′: Transient voltage behind the transient impedance
Given these parameters and the simplified model, the relationship between the stator voltage Vs and the stator current Is can be derived from the equivalent circuit as shown in the simplified representation (Fig. 2). The transient voltage E′ can be expressed in terms of the stator current and the transient reactance.

Figure 2: Transient state equivalent circuit of induction motor
From the equivalent circuit, we can express the stator voltage Vs as: Vs=E′+Is⋅X′
Where E′ is the transient voltage behind the transient impedance X′.
This relationship provides a foundation for analyzing the IM's performance in the context of power system stability studies, where the simplified model offers a balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.
The provided text describes the mathematical modeling of induction motors (IM) and their dynamic responses to voltage sags. Here's a breakdown of the key points:
• Slip (s): Represents the difference between the synchronous speed (ωs) and the actual rotor speed.
• Synchronous Angular Velocity (ωs): The speed at which the rotating magnetic field in the stator rotates.
• Inertia Time Constant (Tj): The combined inertia time constant of the induction motor and the mechanical load.
• Rotor Open-Circuit Reactance (X): Sum of the stator reactance (Xs) and the magnetizing reactance (Xm).
• Transient Open-Circuit Time Constant (T ′0): Given by (Xs + Xm) / (Rr ωs), where Rr is the rotor resistance. This characterizes the decay of rotor transients when the stator is open-circuited.
• Electrical Torque (Te): The torque generated by the motor's electrical system.
• Mechanical Torque (Tm): The torque due to the mechanical load, assumed constant in this work.
Stator Current Components
The d-axis and q-axis components of the stator current (Ids and Iqs) satisfy a set of equations involving d-axis and q-axis components of voltage and flux linkage (Ed ′, Eq ′, Vds, and Vqs).
Three-Order Electromechanical Transient Model
The model describes the rotor transients and rotor acceleration equation, often used in electromechanical simulation software packages.

First-Order Mechanical Transient Model
If rotor electrical transients are neglected, a simpler first-order model can be used. This model, also called the first-order speed model, can predict rotor speed, electrical torque, and active power responses to voltage perturbations but has limited accuracy for reactive power and stator current responses.
Analytical Solution of Dynamic Response
The objective is to solve the three-order dynamic model for more accurate results. The solution process is divided into several parts:
• Static Network Equations: Using symmetrical components, three-phase voltages during voltage sag are decomposed into positive-sequence, negative-sequence, and zero-sequence components.
• Dynamic Differential Equations: Solution involves handling the dynamic equations of the system.
• IM Electrical Power and Stator Currents: The final part involves obtaining electrical power and stator currents of the IM.
Network Equations
Three-phase voltages during voltage sags are decomposed using symmetrical components (positive, negative, and zero sequences). The positive and negative sequence terminal voltages at the IM bus are calculated.
Rotor Slip Calculation
Voltage sags cause mechanical transients in the IM. By solving the acceleration equation, rotor speed can be accurately calculated even when rotor circuit dynamics are ignored. The stator voltage equation is described using the positive-sequence and negative-sequence steady-state equivalent circuits.
This method provides a more accurate way to model the dynamic response of induction motors during voltage sags by considering a higher-order dynamic model. The approach can be extended to multiple IMs or composite loads, enhancing voltage stability studies where reactive power is a concern.

Figure 3: Negative-sequence equivalent circuit of an IM
Presence of Negative-Sequence Voltage:
When there is a negative-sequence voltage at the IM terminal, a negative-sequence stator current is induced, creating a rotating magnetic field opposite to the rotor's rotation at synchronous speed. This results in a rotor slip of (2−s).
Simplification Assumptions:
The magnetizing reactance of the IM is assumed to be much larger than the stator and rotor impedances, hence it is neglected.
Positive-Sequence and Negative-Sequence Torque:
The positive-sequence electrical torque is derived and given by: where k1 is a constant based on machine parameters .
For the negative-sequence torque, when multiplied by (2−s)^2 and simplified, it is: where k2 is another constant based on machine parameters .
Rotor Acceleration Equation:
During an unbalanced sag, the rotor acceleration equation accounts for both positive and negative-sequence torques: where J is the rotor inertia, ωr is the rotor speed, Tm is the mechanical torque, Te1 is the positive-sequence torque, and Te2 is the negative-sequence torque .
After the sag ends, the equation simplifies to:
IM Slip Dynamics:
The slip s during the sag and after the sag can be found by solving the respective differential equations:
where fdur(s) and fafter(s) are functions derived from the torque equations .
Stator Currents and Power Consumption:
Using the obtained slips during and after the sag, sequence components of the stator currents and power consumptions are calculated:

where g1, g2, and h are functions based on the slip and machine parameters .
Rotor Transients:
Positive-sequence and negative-sequence transient voltages during and after the sag are determined by solving first-order non-homogeneous linear differential equations: where a, b, c, and d are constants derived from machine parameters, and Vs1 and Vs2 are the positive-sequence and negative-sequence voltages
Validation and Application:
The method is validated by comparing the analytical results with those from the PSCAD/EMTDC simulation software, showing good agreement. This indicates the effectiveness of the analytical approach in predicting IM behavior under voltage sag conditions .
The method is also applied to compute the transient responses of a power system composite load, demonstrating its feasibility for power system stability studies .
By breaking down these steps and equations, one can understand the impact of negative-sequence voltage on IM performance during voltage sags, the resulting slip dynamics, and how to calculate the transient responses accurately.

The time-domain simulation of power systems is crucial for examining their transient performance. Load models play a significant role in the stability analysis of power systems. In China, the IM (Induction Motor) parallel static ZIP model is often used to simulate composite loads. Given the numerous load nodes in a power system, using the composite load dynamic simulation model extensively necessitates high-speed power system simulations.
PSCAD/EMTDC Software:
• Utilizes the fifth-order IM model.
• Accurately calculates the dynamic response of motors under symmetrical and asymmetrical voltage sags.
• Calculation is complex and time-consuming.
PSD/BPA Software:
• Employs the third-order IM model.
• Faster calculation speed compared to electromagnetic transient simulation.
• Ignores negative sequence components under asymmetric voltage sags.
• Small negative sequence voltage can produce significant negative sequence current and torque due to small IM slip, leading to inaccurate simulation results under asymmetric faults.
• Analytical Methods and Improvements
First-order Mechanical Transient Model:
• Achieves analytical calculation of the first-order mechanical transient model of IMs.
• Low calculation accuracy for reactive power and current.
Third-order Electromechanical Transient Model:
• Uses the phasor form of the rotor transient voltage differential equation.
• Provides accurate transient slip, rotor transient voltage, power, and current of IMs under both symmetrical and asymmetrical voltage sags.
Advantages of the Proposed Analytical Method
• Algebraic Computational Models:
o All models are algebraic expressions.
o Faster computation compared to solving differential algebraic equations in electromechanical and electromagnetic transient simulations.
• Consideration of Negative Sequence Components:
o Accounts for the impact of negative sequence components on IM transient response.
o Higher accuracy under asymmetric faults compared to simulations that only consider positive sequence fundamental components.
• Ease of Analysis:
o Explicit calculation of mechanical and electrical parameters of the IM.
o Facilitates straightforward analysis and interpretation of results and phenomena.
The proposed analytical method provides a more efficient and accurate approach for simulating the transient performance of power systems, particularly under asymmetric faults. By addressing the limitations of existing models and incorporating the influence of negative sequence components, this method enhances the accuracy and speed of power system simulations, making it a valuable tool for stability analysis and transient performance studies.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DIAGRAM
Figure 1: Steady state equivalent circuit of induction motor
Figure 2: Transient state equivalent circuit of induction motor
Figure 3: Negative-sequence equivalent circuit of an IM , Claims:1. Performance analysis of Static voltage stability analysis considering induction motor loads claims that Induction motors (IMs) consume a significant portion of the total energy supplied by power systems, ranging between 60–70%. This dominance means their dynamic behavior greatly influences overall system performance.
2. The transient characteristics of power system loads are predominantly influenced by the dynamics of IMs, making their accurate modeling crucial for reliable power system analysis.
3. The proposed analytical method offers a precise description of IM behavior under disturbances. This accuracy is vital for understanding and predicting the performance of IMs during transient events.
4. The method is computationally efficient, which is essential for real-time applications and large-scale power system simulations where quick response times are necessary.
5. By incorporating this analytical method, the accuracy of electromechanical transient simulations is significantly enhanced, especially under asymmetrical fault conditions, leading to more reliable predictions.
6. The method allows for the inclusion of voltage dynamics in the simulations. This is crucial for capturing the complete behavior of IMs under varying operating conditions and disturbances.
7. The method can be integrated into existing electromechanical simulation software packages, making it practical for use in comprehensive power system stability analysis.
8. By improving the accuracy and speed of simulations, the method enables power system operators to make better-informed decisions, enhancing the stability and reliability of the power grid.
9. The method’s ability to accurately simulate IM behavior under asymmetrical faults is particularly beneficial, as these faults can be complex and challenging to model with conventional methods.
10. The integration of this analytical method into electromechanical simulation tools represents a significant advancement, providing a more robust framework for analyzing and ensuring power system stability.