Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

"Propulsion Gas Exhaust Assembly In An Aircraft Forming An Elbow"

Abstract: The present invention relates to a propulsion gas exhaust assembly in an aircraft propelled by hot gases produced along the axis of the latter by a gas generator, comprising a duct (21) and a nozzle (24). It is noteworthy by the fact that said duct forms a vertical elbow.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
27 April 2007
Publication Number
45/2007
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2017-03-10
Renewal Date

Applicants

SNECMA
2 BOULEVARD DU GENERAL MARTIAL VALIN, 75015 PARIS, FRANCE

Inventors

1. THOMAS DARIS
154 RUE DE CHARENTON, 75012, PARIS, FRANCE
2. JACKIE, RAYMOND JULIEN PROUTEAU
14 RUE DES PERDRIX, 94440 VILLECRESNES, FRANCE
3. ALAIN, PIERRE PAGE
8 RUE D'ESCHBORN, 91230 MONTGERON, FRANCE
4. EDGAR BRUNET
28, RUE DU GENERAL LECLERC, 92200 NEUILLY SUR SEINE, FRANCE

Specification

The invention relates to the field of aircraft propulsion by ejection of gas flows, and relates to the exhaust assembly downstream of the gas generator up to the nozzle.
For aircraft propelled by turbojets, with or without pilot, drones, for military applications, one objective is stealth.
Stealth is defined in particular in relation to two parameters: the radar cross section (RCS) and the infrared signature (IRS) . The RCS is the surface area likely to appear on a radar, taking account of the geometry of the aircraft. The IRS is the heat signature that the aircraft leaves, particularly at its ejection nozzles.
To reduce this heat signature, or even delete it, it is a known practice to mask the infrared radiation emitted by the hot gases exiting the gas generator. For example US patent 3 693 880 is known that describes a device of this type. It comprises a screen in the shape of a body of revolution placed in the gas exhaust channel while being at a distance from the walls of the latter and held by radial arms. It has an aerodynamic shape guiding the gases in the best way possible along its ovoid profile and its surface is cooled by the colder air carried by the radial arms. The cylindrical duct becomes annular between the screen and the wall of the duct. The flow again becomes cylindrical downstream of the screen to be exhausted through a nozzle. The diameter of the duct becomes larger at this location and follows an axial profile parallel to that of the screen to conserve a sufficient opening. The maximum diameter of the screen is sufficient to mask the turbine from view from the rear. In addition the downstream portion of the screen has a double wall traversed by the cooling air in order to prevent any heating thereof.

The present applicant has furthermore developed a double nozzle, called a bifid nozzle, in which the gas flow exiting from the gas generation means is divided into two flows and guided to two nozzles. The two flows of equal size are ejected in parallel in the axis of the thrust. The advantage of this arrangement is to allow the guidance of the aircraft, particularly in yaw by a control of the two flows either by orientation of their thrust vector or by the delivery rates. Being separated from one another, they are also offset from the axis of the generator. In this manner, in the case where the gas generator means comprises a turbine, the latter is capable of being invisible from the rear through the opening of the nozzles. The infrared signature is therefore small.
The subject of the present invention is an exhaust device whose infrared signature is further reduced relative to the former solution.
The invention succeeds in achieving this objective with a propulsion gas exhaust assembly, in an aircraft propelled by hot gases produced along the axis of the latter by a gas generator, particularly a gas turbine engine, comprising a duct and a nozzle, wherein said duct forms a vertical elbow in such a way that the gas flow upstream of the elbow is within the visibility limits.
In the present application, the term "elbow" is understood in the following manner. The duct comprises a first portion guiding the gas flow in a radial direction away from the axis and a second portion downstream of the first, guiding the gas flow in a radial direction toward the axis. Downstream of the elbow, the flow is returned to the axis.

Advantageously, the axis of the nozzle is parallel, preferably coaxial, to that of the gas flow exiting from the gas generator.
According to an advantageous embodiment, the cross section of the duct over a portion of its length is elongate in shape in the crosswise direction.
More particularly, the duct comprises a transverse entrance plane and the nozzle a throat plane that is distant from the entrance plane by a length Lchannei/ and the transverse plane of the elbow, at the maximum vertical deviation is situated at a distance from the entrance plane Leibow such that the ratio Leibow/ Lchannei lies between 0.5 and 0.7; and/or the height Hint of the internal wall and the height Hext of the external wall of the elbow relative to the axis of the gas flow, corresponding to the level of maximum vertical deviation, are in a ratio Hint/Hext <= 1/2. According to another feature, the ratio Hext/Lchannei is approximately 1/3.
Surprisingly, it has been found that by vertically bending the gas flow up or down in this manner it was possible to effectively mask not only the disk of the turbine but also the hottest portions downstream of the latter. Furthermore, this concept also makes it possible to design a duct geometry minimizing the aerodynamic pressure drops load while favoring the mixture of the gases before ejection.
The masking to the infrared radiation is further improved by dividing the flow into two flows transversely apart from one another. Thus, according to another feature, the duct comprises a transition zone element communicating in the downstream direction with two duct elements each opening into a half-nozzle.

The invention also relates to the guidance capability supplied by this latter type of exhaust. The solution described in the patent application filed by the present applicant under number FR 0551857 has been applied. Specifically, in the case of a nozzle as intended to be fitted to a military drone, an objective of IRS and RCS stealth is linked with the need for vectored thrust. This leads to designing very flat two-dimensional nozzles, with an elongation of the order of 5 for IRS and RCS stealth and with a pointed external shape for RCS stealth.
A further object of the present invention is the production of an aircraft controlling device, particularly for controlling an aircraft in yaw, that is effective and associated with a control of the engine delivery rate.
This device must be applicable to single-engined or twin-engined aircraft and in particular to drones.
This device must be capable of continuously providing a low amplitude vectorization without causing a gas generator performance penalty.
It must be capable of providing a major vectored thrust for the needs of controlling the aircraft.
It must be capable of limiting the IRS in the rear and sideways sector.
Thus, according to another feature, the exhaust assembly is shaped so as to divide the main propulsion gas flow into a first and a second flow for an ejection into a first and a second half-nozzle and comprises at least one of the following two controlling means: a means of distributing the main flow into each of the

two half-nozzles and a means of orienting the thrust vector produced by each of the two half-nozzles.
"Half-nozzle" means, in the present application, a gas ejection nozzle that receives a portion of the main flow downstream of the turbine. This term is not associated with a particular shape. Use is made of the two-flow solution to separately control the two half-thrust vectors in modulus and in orientation.
Advantageously, at least one of said two means, preferably both, use fluid injection and still preferably the exhaust assembly comprises said two means. This solution has the advantage of being simple and of operating with a reduced number of fluid injection devices, ensuring a high reliability and low cost. However, the means of controlling the two flows may be mechanical.
According to a particular embodiment, the main flow is generated by -two gas generators, and comprises a means of orienting the thrust vector produced by each of the two half-nozzles.
In the first place, said half-nozzles are placed for a yaw orientation of the thrust vector. In this way the absence of a vertical stabilizer is alleviated.
According to one variant, said half-nozzles are placed for a pitch or roll control or else the nozzle comprises two pairs of half-nozzles, for example one for the yaw orientation, the other for the pitch orientation. Other arrangements or combinations are possible.
According to another feature, the means for controlling the distribution of the flows comprises means for fluid injection at the throat of each of the half-nozzles.

More precisely, the gas generator being a turbojet, the fluid injection means are supplied by the air that can be tapped from the compressor of the generator. This solution is particularly advantageous because it allows a balanced operation in all the flight phases. Particularly, a nozzle operation procedure is planned according to which the air is continuously tapped from the generator compressor.
According to a variant embodiment, the main flow is generated by two gas generators. In this case, the exhaust assembly preferably comprises only one means of orienting the thrust vector produced by each of the two half-nozzles.
The invention is now described in greater detail with reference to the appended drawings in which
figure 1 shows in a top view an example of an aircraft to which the invention is applied;
figure 2 shows in a top view a nozzle of the bifid type as described in application FR 05 51 857;
figure 3 shows, in a side view, an exhaust assembly according to a first embodiment of the invention;
figures 4 to 6 show the assembly of figure 3 seen respectively from above, from behind and in rear three-quarter perspective;
figure 7 shows in a top view an exhaust assembly according to a second embodiment of the invention;
figures 8 to 10 show the assembly of figure 7 seen respectively in profile, from the rear and in rear three-quarter perspective;
figure 11 shows the various shapes of the cross section of the transition duct element moving along the axis in the downstream direction;
figure 12 is a schematic representation of the arrangement of the control means of the invention in a half-nozzle;

figure 13 illustrates the operation of the control means placed at the throat;
figure 14 illustrates the operation of the control means placed in the divergence of the half-nozzles.
The aircraft 1 represented in the figure is a nonlimiting example. It has a nose 2, two wings 3 and 4 and is propelled by one or two turbojets that are not visible. It is shaped so as to have the smallest possible RCS and IRS. Its rear portion in particular has no vertical stabilizer and terminates in a point 5 with an appropriate apex angle, for example 40°, to reject the radar waves to infinity. The exhaust assembly 10 participates in this requirement by being bifid. It distributes the main flow exiting the channel 12 at the entrance into two flows in two symmetrical channels 12A and 12B that terminate in two half-nozzles 14 and 16 of rectangular section. The channels 12, 12A and 12B have a shape suitable for ensuring the separation of the flow into two flows but also the transition from a circular or substantially circular section cylindrical shape to a rectangular section shape.
According to the present application, the shape of the
exhaust assembly is enhanced so as to ensure the
masking of the turbine block irrespective of the
position of a rear observer.
With reference to figures 3 to 6, the geometry of the exhaust assembly 20 according to the invention can be seen.
This assembly comprises a duct 21 with an entrance tubular element 21A, on the side of the gas generator, and connected to a nozzle 24. The axis XX of the nozzle is that of the gas flow exiting the turbine.

The entrance tubular element 21A is in direct communication with the outlet of the engine turbine. As can be seen in figure 11, its section is preferably circular. It may however be different.
Moving axially downstream relative to the gas flow, the duct forms an elbow. The duct deviates from the axis in the vertical direction, here downwards, and diverts the gas flow radially toward the outside up to a maximum deviation relative to the axis at 21M where the flow becomes axial. It then moves closer to the axis by deviating the flow radially toward the axis up to 2IN where it is returned to the axis XX. The duct terminates in the divergent nozzle 24 downstream of the throat that is situated in this example at the plane 21N. Here it has a rectangular section, but other shapes are possible. According to the embodiment illustrated, the nozzle comprises two horizontal walls parallel with one another each forming a point. This type of exhaust is suitable for incorporation into an aircraft such as that shown in figure 1 aimed at RCS stealth and IRS stealth via the elbow of the duct.
The shape of the duct changes from the entrance plane in the downstream direction progressively by widening in the crosswise direction while reducing in height up to the low level of the elbow that is the section furthest away transversely from the axis. Then the shape of the cross section of the duct 21 changes progressively in the downstream direction until it has the shape of the nozzle. The areas are determined according to the requirements of the fluid dynamics.
Preferably, the assembly has at least one of the following dimensional relations:
Leibow/LChannei lies between 0.5 and 0.7; Hmt/Hext 1/2;

= 1/3 approximately; The Hint/LChanne:L ratio is deduced from this; it is close to 1/6; where
Leibow is the length measured axially in the downstream direction from the entrance plane of the tubular element 21A to the level 21M where the elbow reaches the maximum vertical deviation;
^channel is the length measured axially in the downstream direction from the entrance plane of the tubular element 21A to the throat of the nozzle at level 21N; Hint is the height of the elbow measured transversely from the axis XX to the internal wall of the duct 21, at the level 21M where the elbow reaches the maximum vertical deviation;
Hext is the height of the elbow measured transversely from the axis XX to the external wall of the duct 21, at the level 21M where the elbow reaches the maximum vertical deviation.
As illustrated by the straight line Dl, such a geometry makes it possible to effectively mask the hot zones of the engine. The straight line Dl constitutes one of the limits of visibility of the hot zones.
A description is now given of the variant that is illustrated in figures 7 to 10. According to this embodiment, the formation of a vertical elbow according to the invention is combined with the division of the flow into two distinct flows in an exhaust assembly of the bifid type.
The duct of the exhaust assembly 30 comprises a first cylindrical duct element 31 with an entrance plane 31A of the gases exiting the gas generator. This first duct element 31 is in the axis of the gas flow and is of cross section, particularly circular, connecting to the gas generator that is not shown. Downstream, the duct
element 31 is extended by a second duct element 32. The cross section of this element 32 changes progressively from the circular shape of the element 31 to a shape that is transversely elongate and of reduced height, with a beginning of separation into two channels. Advantageously, this beginning of separation takes the contour of two identical ellipses that overlap and whose major axis is horizontal in the same plane. The two ellipses separate progressively from one another as can be seen at 32B and 32C of figure 11. At the end of transition, there are two distinct third duct elements 33 and 35 with sections in this instance of elliptical shape. The two duct elements 33 and 35 each open into a half-nozzle 34, 36 respectively. These two half-nozzles are in one and the same horizontal plane, at the same level as the axis of the entrance section 31A. Their deviation in the horizontal plane is for example of the order of the diameter of the entrance section 31A. The two half-nozzles have, in this embodiment, a section of rectangular shape. The section of the two duct elements 33 and 35 changes from the elliptical shape of figure 11 to that of the nozzles, still conserving areas determined by the constraints of the fluid dynamics. The two half-nozzles have a downstream bevel shape with the top wall and the bottom wall parallel with one another, an internal wall, close to the axis XX, longer than the external vertical wall. The two vertical walls form a divergence.
The portion of the exhaust assembly constituted by the second duct element 32 and the two third duct elements 33 and 35 forms an elbow which, seen in profile, is advantageously defined by the same parameters as the first embodiment above. The profile of the assembly 30 represented in figure 8 is the same as that of the assembly 30 represented in figure 3. The section of this portion at the maximum transverse deviation relative to the axis of the gas flow is situated either
in the second duct element 32, of transition, or in the two third duct elements 33 and 35.
The means of yaw guidance of the aircraft will now be described with reference to figures 12, 13 and 14. In this example, each of the half-nozzles consists of a rectangular throat, 34C and 36C respectively, with a high horizontal elongation, width/height ratio. The elongation of the nozzles may be 2.5. Downstream of the throat, the divergence is formed by two vertical walls. It is short on the external side 34DE (36DE not shown) . The vertical -walls on the internal side 34D1 (36D1 not shown) are longer. This gives a beveled shape of the downstream edge of the nozzles, 34 and 36. The top and bottom walls are either parallel with one another or divergent.
The assembly is preferably optimized to provide, in the cases with no injection and no vectorization, a minimum transverse thrust of each half-nozzle. Specifically, the latter results in a loss of axial thrust that must be reduced to a minimum. The overall lateral thrust remains zero because of the symmetry of the system.
According to a feature of the invention, to provide the guidance of the aircraft 1 without a tail unit, control means are provided by which action is taken on the two flows. These control means may be mechanical or fluidic. In this example, they are fluid.
The convergent-divergent nozzle 34 of figure 12 comprises the throat 34C and downstream the two divergent walls 34D1 and 34DE. Here the nozzle comprises a fluid injector 28 placed on a wall at the throat and a fluid injector 29 situated on the wall 34D1 of the divergence. The injector 29 is preferably situated close to the end of the divergence.
In a symmetrical manner, the half-nozzle 36 is fitted with a fluid injector 28 at the throat 36C and a fluid injector 29 on the wall of divergence 36D1.
The injectors 28 and 29 are advantageously supplied with air tapped from the turbojet compressor that supplies the main flow, as appropriate.
Operation is as follows. Figure 13 shows by arrows 28/34 and 28/36 the air injections via the injectors 28. The yaw moment is created by controlling the distribution of the delivery rate in each of the two half-nozzles 34 and 36 by means of fluid injections at the two throats. The value of the delivery rate is illustrated by the length of the arrow, and here one arrow is longer than the other. According to this example, the half-nozzle 34 receives a strong injected delivery rate 28/34, and consequently sustains a major restriction of the effective section at the throat. Conversely, the half-nozzle 36 receives little or no delivery rate at the throat. The result of this is the creation of an axial thrust differential. The thrust Fl on the half-nozzle 36 is greater than the thrust F2 on the half-nozzle 34. The result of this is a yaw moment.
It is observed however that a sudden obstruction of the nozzle would instantaneously create an increase in pressure in the channel and a risk of pumping the compressor. According to a preferred operating mode, a nominal permanent injection is created. This is done at equal delivery rate tapped off in such a way that the generator does not undergo a sudden variation during the mission while regulating the nozzle at total equal effective section at the throat. The thermodynamic cycle of the engine is directly optimized under this constraint of constant tapping. In this manner, the system of regulating the tapped air operates
continuously and does not undergo any transitional startup phase.
Therefore this operating mode provides, with a low impact on the performance of the engine, a vectored thrust that makes it possible to compensate for the absence of cell tail unit, particularly for cruising or slow transitional speeds.
The operation of the injection device situated in the divergence of the nozzles 34 and 36 is now described with reference to figure 14.
The injectors 29, in this embodiment, are preferably placed at the end of the long wall of divergence. By injecting a fluid into the nozzle 34, the direction of which is represented by the arrow 29/34, a deviation of the thrust vector produced by the nozzle and shown by the arrow F'2 is induced. The thrust F'l provided by the half-nozzle 36 remains axial since nothing disrupts its direction. This results in the creation of a yaw moment relative to the center of gravity of the aircraft. This operating mode provides a substantial vectored thrust to control the aircraft, to the detriment however of the performance of the generator. This deterioration is however controlled.
One embodiment of the invention has been described. However, many variants are possible without departing from the context of the invention. For example, a channel has been shown supplied by a single gas generator. In the case of a twin-engined aircraft, the two half-flows of exhaust are generated by two distinct engines whose regulation is synchronized. Preferably, only the injectors in the divergence are used.
Variants of the arrangement and operation of the control means comprise the presence of a single control
means. It is possible to operate it at the same time as the other means or separately.
According to an embodiment not shown, the nozzles may
be of the fluid type with ejector, that is to say a
secondary flow emerging in or downstream of the main
channel.
The control means according to the invention may be combined partly with mechanical means of orienting the flows.

Claims
1. A propulsion gas exhaust assembly, in an aircraft
propelled by hot gases produced along the axis (XX) of
the latter by a gas generator, comprising a duct (21;
32, 33, 35) and a nozzle (24; 34, 36), wherein said
duct forms a vertical elbow in such a way that the
elements of the duct upstream of the elbow are within
the visibility limits.
2. The assembly as claimed in the preceding claim
whereof the axis of the nozzle is parallel,
particularly coaxial, to that (XX) of the gas flow
exiting from the gas generator.
3. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims whereof the gas generator is a turbojet.
4. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims whereof the cross section of the duct (21; 32,
33, 35) is elongate in shape in the crosswise
direction.
5. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims whereof the duct comprises an entrance plane
(21A; 31A) and the nozzle (24; 34, 36) a throat plane,
distant from the entrance plane by a length Lchannel; and
the plane of the elbow, corresponding to the maximum
vertical deviation, is situated at a distance from the
entrance plane Lelbow such that the ratio Leibow/Lchannei
lies between 0.5 and 0.7.
6. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims whereof the height Hint of the internal wall and
the height Hext of the external wall of the elbow
relative to the axis of the gas flow, corresponding to
the maximum vertical deviation, are in a ratio Hint/Hext
< 1/2.
6. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims whereof the height Hint of the internal wall and
the height Hext of the external wall of the elbow
relative to the axis of the gas flow, corresponding to
the maximum vertical deviation, are in a ratio Hint/Hext
< 1/2.
7. The assembly as claimed in claims 5 and 6 whereof
the ratio Hext/LChannel is approximately 1/3.
8. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims, whereof the duct comprises successively a first
cylindrical duct element, a second duct element, two
third duct elements, the latter each opening into a
half-nozzle.
9. The assembly as claimed in one of the preceding
claims, shaped so as to divide a main propulsion gas
flow into a first and a second flow for an ejection
into a first and a second half-nozzle and comprising at
least one of the following two controlling means: a
means of distributing the main flow into each of the
two half-nozzles and a means of orienting the thrust
vector produced by each of the two half-nozzles.
10. The assembly as claimed in the preceding claim
whereof said two means are fluid injection or
mechanical.
11. The assembly as claimed in one of claims 7 and 8,
whereof said half-nozzles are placed for a yaw
orientation of the thrust vector.
12. The assembly as claimed in one of claims 7 to 9,
whereof said half-nozzles are placed for a pitch
control.
13. The assembly as claimed in one of claims 9 and 10,
comprising two pairs of half-nozzles, particularly one
14. The assembly as claimed in claim 8, whereof the
means for controlling the distribution of the flows
comprises means (28) for fluid injection at the throat
(34C, 36C) of.each of the half-nozzles.
15. The assembly as. claimed in the preceding claim,
the gas generator being a turbojet, whereof the fluid
injection means (28) are supplied by the air tapped
from the compressor of the generator.
16. A method of operating the exhaust assembly as
claimed in the preceding claim comprising a continuous
tapping from the compressor of the generator.
17. The assembly as claimed in claim 7 or 8, whereof
the main flow is generated by two gas generators, and
comprising a means of orienting the thrust vector
produced by each of the two half-nozzles.
18. A turbomachine comprising an exhaust assembly as
claimed in one of claims 1 to 15 and 17.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 929-DEL-2007-Form-18-(17-12-2009).pdf 2009-12-17
1 929-DEL-2007_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
2 929-DEL-2007-Correspondence-Others-(17-12-2009).pdf 2009-12-17
2 Claims [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
3 Description(Complete) [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
3 abstract.jpg 2011-08-20
4 Examination Report Reply Recieved [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
4 929-del-2007-gpa.pdf 2011-08-20
5 OTHERS [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
5 929-del-2007-form-5.pdf 2011-08-20
6 929-del-2007-form-3.pdf 2011-08-20
6 929-del-2007-Correspondence Others-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
7 929-del-2007-form-2.pdf 2011-08-20
7 929-del-2007-Form-1-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
8 929-del-2007-GPA-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
8 929-del-2007-form-1.pdf 2011-08-20
9 929-del-2007-drawings.pdf 2011-08-20
9 Correspondence [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
10 929-del-2007-description (complete).pdf 2011-08-20
10 Description(Complete) [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
11 929-del-2007-correspondence-others.pdf 2011-08-20
11 Examination Report Reply Recieved [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
12 929-del-2007-claims.pdf 2011-08-20
12 OTHERS [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
13 929-del-2007-abstract.pdf 2011-08-20
13 Petition Under Rule 137 [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
14 Petition Under Rule 137 [23-03-2016(online)].pdf_22.pdf 2016-03-23
15 929-del-2007-abstract.pdf 2011-08-20
15 Petition Under Rule 137 [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
16 929-del-2007-claims.pdf 2011-08-20
16 OTHERS [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
17 Examination Report Reply Recieved [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
17 929-del-2007-correspondence-others.pdf 2011-08-20
18 Description(Complete) [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
18 929-del-2007-description (complete).pdf 2011-08-20
19 929-del-2007-drawings.pdf 2011-08-20
19 Correspondence [23-03-2016(online)].pdf 2016-03-23
20 929-del-2007-form-1.pdf 2011-08-20
20 929-del-2007-GPA-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
21 929-del-2007-Form-1-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
21 929-del-2007-form-2.pdf 2011-08-20
22 929-del-2007-Correspondence Others-(28-03-2016).pdf 2016-03-28
22 929-del-2007-form-3.pdf 2011-08-20
23 929-del-2007-form-5.pdf 2011-08-20
23 OTHERS [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
24 929-del-2007-gpa.pdf 2011-08-20
24 Examination Report Reply Recieved [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
25 Description(Complete) [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
25 abstract.jpg 2011-08-20
26 Claims [12-04-2016(online)].pdf 2016-04-12
26 929-DEL-2007-Correspondence-Others-(17-12-2009).pdf 2009-12-17
27 929-DEL-2007_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
27 929-DEL-2007-Form-18-(17-12-2009).pdf 2009-12-17

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2009 - To 27/04/2010

4th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2010 - To 27/04/2011

5th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2011 - To 27/04/2012

6th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2012 - To 27/04/2013

7th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2013 - To 27/04/2014

8th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2014 - To 27/04/2015

9th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2015 - To 27/04/2016

10th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2016 - To 27/04/2017

11th: 06 May 2017

From 27/04/2017 - To 27/04/2018

12th: 22 Mar 2018

From 27/04/2018 - To 27/04/2019

13th: 25 Mar 2019

From 27/04/2019 - To 27/04/2020

14th: 18 Apr 2020

From 27/04/2020 - To 27/04/2021

15th: 22 Apr 2021

From 27/04/2021 - To 27/04/2022

16th: 20 Apr 2022

From 27/04/2022 - To 27/04/2023

17th: 25 Apr 2023

From 27/04/2023 - To 27/04/2024

18th: 23 Apr 2024

From 27/04/2024 - To 27/04/2025

19th: 15 Apr 2025

From 27/04/2025 - To 27/04/2026