Abstract: The present disclosure relates to a red brick comprising: 20-50 wt% of red mud; 10-20 wt% of bottom ash; 10-30 wt% of natural sand; 15-30 wt% of fly ash; and 4-15 wt% of Portland cement. The present disclosure also relates to a process for preparing a red brick comprising: mixing 20-50 wt% of red mud, 10-20 wt% of bottom ash, 10-30 wt% of natural sand to form a first mixture, adding 15-30 wt% of fly ash and 4-15 wt% of Portland cement to the first mixture to form a second mixture, rolling the second mixture in a pan mixer having roller and scraper to produce a final mixture, molding the final mixture in a brick press to provide a pressed red brick, and stacking the pressed red brick in yards to form a red brick.
Field of invention
The present disclosure relates to red bricks made up of waste material generated in
power plant and alumina refinery.
The present disclosure also related to a process of preparation of red bricks using the
waste material generated in power plant and alumina refinery.
Background
Bricks are the most used building materials in construction industry. It is being used
to construct walls, foundations and many other parts of buildings and other masonry
structures. Bricks are laid in courses and other many patterns termed as bond, it may be laid
with various kinds of mortar to hold the bricks together and make a durable structure. The
structures may be load bearing or just partition walls.
There are many types of bricks available based on their use, size, forming methods,
quality and material used for construction. Most common are clay bricks and chemically set
bricks. Generally, clay bricks are baked in kiln after moulding and drying. Chemically set
bricks are mixed with chemical or cement moulded and dried in open air and curing with
watering or without watering. It gains strength with chemical reaction within it and therefore,
there is no need of baking in kiln.
Conventional clay bricks are made with the precious earth material which is being
depleted day by day. It is also a concern from an environmental conservation point of view. It
also requires huge amount of fossil fuel i.e. coal for baking it.
Red mud is an industrial waste from an alumina-producing industry. The red mud is
composed mainly of iron oxide, and hence is red in colour. The quantity of red mud produced
per ton of alumina produced, is generally about 1-2.5 tons. The red mud is generally disposed
of, posing environmental problems.
Chinese Patent Application Number CN101468905 discloses red mud unburned brick
which mainly consists of 5-30 parts of red mud, 20-30 parts of fly ash, 20-50 parts of quartz
sand or gravel powder, 5-15 parts of lime, 2-8 portions of gypsum and 0-3 parts of cement.
Chinese Patent Application Number CN1079452 discloses a red mud composite brick
comprising red mud, fly ash, lime, gypsum and sand. Another Chinese Patent Application
Number CN101215142 relates to Bayer red mud composite brick, prepared by mixing raw
materials of 20-35 parts of Bayer red mud, 15-34 parts of fly ash, 5-15 parts of carbide slag,
30-40 parts of slag, 5-12 parts of cement and 0-5 parts of gypsum. Chinese Patent
Application Number CN 101020603 discloses light red mud brick and its making process.
The red brick in this publication is composed of 15-50 parts of red mud, 35-70 parts of fly
ash, 8-12 parts of lime and 4-6 parts of silica sand.
In making of bricks, carbide lime mostly used and it is by product of gas making
plants and does not meet consistency in quality. Purity of such lime varies from 40 to 70%.
Due to such non-consistency of lime quality, brick quality also gets affected and varies in
compressive strength. Therefore, there is a need for an alternative to compositions using lime.
Object:
The primary object of the present disclosure is to provide a red brick comprising red mud;
bottom ash; natural sand; fly ash; and Portland cement.
Another objective of the present disclosure is to provide a red brick having compressive
strength of not less than 75 kg/cm .
Yet another objective of the present disclosure is to provide a process for preparing a red
brick.
Further an objective of the present disclosure is to provide a red brick made up of waste
material generated in power plant and alumina refinery.
Summary:
The present disclosure relates to a red brick comprising: 20-50 wt% of red mud; 10-20 wt%
of bottom ash; 10-30 wt% of natural sand; 15-30 wt% of fly ash; and 4-15 wt% of Portland
cement.
The present disclosure also relates to a process for preparing a red brick comprising: mixing
20-50 wt% of red mud, 10-20 wt% of bottom ash, 10-30 wt% of natural sand to form a first
mixture; adding 15-30 wt% of fly ash and 4-15 wt% of Portland cement to the first mixture to
form a second mixture; rolling the second mixture in a pan mixer having roller and scraper to
produce a final mixture; moulding the final mixture in a brick press to provide a pressed red
brick; and stacking the pressed red brick in yards to form a red brick.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present subject matter will become
better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. This
summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form. This summary
is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor
is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Detailed description:
The present disclosure provides a red brick comprising: 20-50 wt% of red mud; 10-20 wt% of
bottom ash; 10-30 wt% of natural sand; 15-30 wt% of fly ash; and 4-15 wt% of Portland
cement.
The red brick of the present disclosure has compressive strength of not less than 75 kg/cm .
The red mud is a bi-product of Alumina refinery in aluminum manufacturing plant. It is
generated in the process of extracting alumina from Bauxite ore. It is approx. 50 to 60 % of
Bauxite used for alumina extraction. After drying and sieving the red mud (collected from
pond), it is ready to use for red brick manufacturing.
The fly ash used in the present application has a particle size in the range of 90 Micron to 600
Micron. The fly ash is very fine material generated in thermal power plant in process of
burning coal in boilers to produce thermal energy. The total ash generation is normally 40%
of coal fed in boilers. The fly ash generation is approx. 80% of total ash generation. Normally
it is collected through electrostatic precipitators. Fly ash has a higher reactivity, and it acts as
a binding materials in reaction with cement. The fly ash is directly mixed in red brick
manufacturing.
The bottom ash has a particle size in the range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm. The bottom ash is
also a bi-product of coal burning in boilers of thermal plant. It is coarser in nature. Bottom
ash generation is approx. 20% of total as generation in thermal power plant. Bottom ash has a
reactivity value of 5-7% which helps to increase the strength of the brick. Due to less
reactivity, bottom ash also acts as filler material like natural sand. After getting desired
particle size, it is ready to use in red brick manufacturing.
The natural sand has a particle size in the range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm. Natural sand is found
in river bed. The dried sand is cleaned to remove any foreign materials and it is ready to use
in red brick manufacturing. Natural sand acts as a filler material.
Bottom ash has lesser number of coarse particles in comparison to natural sand. A
combination of sand and bottom ash meets the desired particle size distribution of the
composition of the composition for better workability of mix during the manufacturing of red
bricks.
Portland cement is a standard product available in market. It is a binding material commonly
used in building construction industries. It reacts with filler materials and develops strength.
It is directly added in red brick manufacturing. The Portland cement contains gypsum.
Gypsum is available as a bi-product of chemical and fertilizer industries. Gypsum also
influences the setting process of brick and gaining early strength.
The present disclosure also provides a process for preparing a red brick comprising: mixing
20-50 wt% of red mud, 10-20 wt% of bottom ash, 10-30 wt% of natural sand to form a first
mixture, adding 15-30 wt% of fly ash and 4-15 wt% of Portland cement to the first mixture to
form a second mixture, rolling the second mixture in a pan mixer having roller and scraper to
produce a final mixture, moulding the final mixture in a brick press to provide a pressed red
brick, and stacking the pressed red brick in yards to form a red brick.
The rolling of second mixture in the pan mixer is carried out for 3 minutes, at 28-35 °C. The
molding of final mixture is carried out for 30 Sec, at 28-35 °C. The stacking of pressed red
brick is carried out for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open yard, at atmospheric
temperature and pressure. Further, the natural sand is dried and cleaned to remove foreign
materials before mixing with red mud and bottom ash to obtain the first mixture.
The developed red bricks are made using 70% waste material generated in power plant and
alumina refinery. These bricks are not required to burn in kiln and no air pollution is caused
due to burning of huge coal in normal lay bricks production. The parameters such as
Compressive Strength, Size, Weight, Water Absorption and Efflorescence, of the red bricks
of the present application are comparative to normal clay bricks which are commercially
available.
These red bricks gain required strength in 15 days in open area and ready to use. As it is
machine produced so there is no any dimensional variation, it is little higher in weight but
very little water absorbent.
The advantages of the present disclosure include utilization of waste generated in power plant
and alumina refineries, up-cycling of waste to useful product, low costs as machine
production is involved. As no precious earth/clay is being used, and no coal is burnt as it is a
cold setting material, it also saves environment. There is no deformation in shape and size,
and the red bricks are comparable to normal clay bricks in shape, size, appearance and
strength.
Examples
The following examples are given by way of illustration of the present invention and should
not be construed to limit the scope of present disclosure. It is to be understood that both the
foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and
explanatory only and are intended to provide further explanation of the subject matter.
Example 1: Preparation of Red Brick
13 wt% of Bottom ash in the particle size range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm, 20 wt% of natural
sand in the particle size range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm and 31 wt% of red mud were mixed to
form a first mixture. To this first mixture, 25 wt % of fly ash in the particle size range of 45
um to 600 um, and 11 wt % of Portland cement were added and mixed to form a second
mixture. The second mixture thus formed was then rolled for 3 minutes in a pan mixer having
roller and scraper at 30 °C to produce final mixture. This final mixture was moulded for 30
seconds in a brick press at 30 °C to provide a pressed red brick. The pressed red brick was
stacked for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards at atmospheric temperature
and pressure to form a red brick.
The red brick thus formed has a composition as set out in the table below -
Table 1. Composition of the Red Brick 1
Component
Red Mud
Bottom Ash
Natural Sand
Fly Ash
Portland Cement
Content (wt%)
31
13
20
25
11
Example 2: Preparation of Red Brick 2
13 wt% of Bottom ash in the particle size range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm, 20 wt% of natural
sand in the particle size range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm and 32 wt% of red mud were mixed to
form a first mixture. To this first mixture, 25 wt % of fly ash in the particle size range of 45
um to 600 um, and 10 wt % of Portland cement were added and mixed to form a second
mixture. The second mixture thus formed was then rolled for 3 minutes in a pan mixer having
roller and scraper at 28 °C to produce final mixture. This final mixture was moulded for 30
Sec in a brick press at 28 °C to provide a pressed red brick. The pressed red brick was
stacked for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards at atmospheric temperature
and pressure to form a red brick.
The red brick thus formed has a composition as set out in the table below -
Table 2. Composition of the Red Brick 2
Component
Red Mud
Bottom Ash
Natural Sand
Fly Ash
Portland Cement
Content (wt%)
32
13
20
25
10
Example 3: Preparation of Red Brick
20 wt% of Bottom ash in the particle size range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm, 20 wt% of natural
sand in the particle size range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm and 40 wt% of red mud were mixed to
form a first mixture. To this first mixture, 15 wt % of fly ash in the particle size range of 45
um to 600 um, and 5 wt % of Portland cement were added and mixed to form a second
mixture. The second mixture thus formed was then rolled for 3 minutes in a pan mixer having
roller and scraper at 32 °C to produce final mixture. This final mixture was moulded for 30
seconds in a brick press at 32 °C to provide a pressed red brick. The pressed red brick was
stacked for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards at atmospheric temperature
and pressure to form a red brick.
The red brick thus formed has a composition as set out in the table below -
Table 3. Composition of the Red Brick 3
Component
Red Mud
Bottom Ash
Natural Sand
Fly Ash
Portland Cement
Content (wt%)
40
20
20
15
5
Example 4: Preparation of Red Brick
15 wt% of Bottom ash in the particle size range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm, 25 wt% of natural
sand in the particle size range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm and 34 wt% of red mud were mixed to
form a first mixture. To this first mixture, 20 wt % of fly ash in the particle size range of 45
um to 600 um, and 6 wt % of Portland cement were added and mixed to form a second
mixture. The second mixture thus formed was then rolled for 3 minutes in a pan mixer having
roller and scraper at 34 °C to produce final mixture. This final mixture was moulded for 30
seconds in a brick press at 34 °C to provide a pressed red brick. The pressed red brick was
stacked for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards at atmospheric temperature
and pressure to form a red brick.
The red brick thus formed has a composition as set out in the table below -
Table 4. Composition of the Red Brick 4
Component
Red Mud
Bottom Ash
Natural Sand
Fly Ash
Portland Cement
Content (wt%)
34
15
25
20
6
Example 5: Preparation of Red Brick
15 wt% of Bottom ash in the particle size range of 0.15 mm to 4.75 mm, 15 wt% of natural
sand in the particle size range of 0.3 mm to 4.75 mm and 45 wt% of red mud were mixed to
form a first mixture. To this first mixture, 17 wt % of fly ash in the particle size range of 45
um to 600 um, and 8 wt % of Portland cement were added and mixed to form a second
mixture. The second mixture thus formed was then rolled for 3 minutes in a pan mixer having
roller and scraper at 35 °C to produce final mixture. This final mixture was moulded for 30
seconds in a brick press at 35 °C to provide a pressed red brick. The pressed red brick was
stacked for 3 days inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards at atmospheric temperature
and pressure to form a red brick.
The red brick thus formed has a composition as set out in the table below -
Table 5. Composition of the Red Brick 5
Component
Red Mud
Bottom Ash
Natural Sand
Fly Ash
Portland Cement
Content (wt%)
45
15
15
17
8
Example 6: Testing of compressive strength of red bricks
The red bricks of the present disclosure were tested for compressive strength in comparison
with the commercially available clay bricks, such as MEERA, DLX, SAMAJ, TRISHOOL,
KAMAL and JAMUNA.
Comparison of the compressive strengths are shown in the table below -
Table 6. Comparison of compressive strengths
Brick
Compos
ition
Brick 1
Brick 2
Red Mud Bricks
Mark/
Make
RPD
RPD
Compressive
Strength in
Kg/cm2
108.89
104.78
Tested By
*HIL, RPD
Lab & IITBHU
Normal Clay Bricks
Mark/ Make
MEERA
DLX
SAMAJ
TRISHOOL &
JAMUNA
KAMAL
Compressive
Strength in
Kg/cm2
48.36
64.48
32.24
40.30
64.48
Tested
By
HIL,
RPD Lab
* HIL, RPD Lab= Hindalco Industries Limited (Unit Renusagar Power Division) Lab
It is clear from the table above that the red bricks of the present disclosure have superior
compressive strength than the commercially available clay bricks.
Example: Testing of various other parameters of red bricks with the commercially
available clay bricks
The red bricks of the present disclosure were tested for parameters like water absorption,
efflorescence, etc. in comparison with the commercially available clay bricks, such as ATUL
Brand.
Comparison of the parameters are shown in the table below -
Table 7. Comparison of Red Mud Bricks (RPD) & Local Bricks
Red Mud Brick Bricks.
Weight
3.0 to 3.5 Kg
Water
absorption
12-20
Efflorescence
Moderate
Normal Clay Bricks (ATUL Brand )
Weight
2.5 to 3 Kg
Water absorption
51.993
Efflorescence
Slight to
Moderate
S.
No
1
RPD Bricks
Comp.
Strength
in
Kg/cm2
104.78 to
108.89
Water
Absorptio
n (%)
16.9
Effloresce
nee Test
Moderate
IS Code Limits
Comp. Strength in
Kg/cm2
Grade A =>100
Grade-B =75-100
Grade C =50-75
Grade D = Below 50
Water
Absorption
(%)
Max 20%
Efflorescence Test
Shall not be more
than Moderate
Comparative Examples
The red bricks of the present disclosure were compared to the red bricks with lime but
without bottom ash. The table below gives the comparison of the red bricks of the present
disclosure with the red bricks with lime but without bottom ash.
Table 7. Comparison of red bricks of present disclosure with the red bricks with lime but
without bottom ash
Red Bricks without Lime (Present
Disclosure
Sample
Sample-1
Sample-2
Sample-3
Compressive Strength in
Kg/cm2(28 Days Strength)
108.89
111.83
104.78
Red Bricks without Bottom Ash
Sample
Sample-1
Sample-2
Sample-3
Compressive Strength in
Kg/cm2 (28 days)
72.54
72.54
80.60
As can be seen above, the red bricks of the present disclosure exhibit superior compressive
strength than the red bricks with lime but without bottom ash.
Although the subject matter has been described in considerable detail with reference to
certain preferred embodiments thereof, other embodiments are possible. As such, the spirit
and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred
embodiment contained therein.
WE CLAIM:
1. A red brick comprising:
20-50 wt% of red mud;
10-20 wt% of bottom ash;
10-30 wt% of natural sand;
15-30 wt%offly ash; and
4-15 wt% of Portland cement.
2. The red brick as claimed in claim 1, having compressive strength in the range of 75-
110 kg/cm2.
3. The red brick as claimed in claim 1, wherein the fly ash has a particle size in the range
of 45 Micron to 600 Micron.
4. The red brick as claimed in claim 1, wherein the bottom ash has a particle size in the
range of 0.3mm to 4.75mm.
5. The red brick as claimed in claim 1, wherein the natural sand has a particle size in the
range of 0.3mm to 4.75mm.
6. A process for preparing a red brick comprising:
mixing 20-50 wt% of red mud, 10-20 wt% of bottom ash, 10-30 wt% of natural sand
to form a first mixture;
adding 15-30 wt% of fly ash and 4-15 wt% of Portland cement to the first mixture to
form a second mixture;
rolling the second mixture in a pan mixer having roller and scraper to produce a final
mixture;
moulding the final mixture in a brick press to provide a pressed red brick; and
stacking the pressed red brick in yards to form a red brick.
7. The process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the rolling is carried out for 3 minutes, at
28-35 °C.
8. The process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the moulding is carried out for 30 sec, at
28-35 °C.
9. The process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the stacking is carried out for 3 days
inside shed and 12 days in open area in yards, at atmospheric temperature and
pressure.
10. The process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the natural sand is dried and cleaned to
remove foreign materials before mixing with red mud and bottom ash to obtain the
first mixture.
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 201911033876-STATEMENT OF UNDERTAKING (FORM 3) [22-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-22 |
| 2 | 201911033876-FORM 1 [22-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-22 |
| 3 | 201911033876-FIGURE OF ABSTRACT [22-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-22 |
| 4 | 201911033876-DECLARATION OF INVENTORSHIP (FORM 5) [22-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-22 |
| 5 | 201911033876-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [22-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-22 |
| 6 | 201911033876-Proof of Right (MANDATORY) [06-11-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-11-06 |
| 7 | 201911033876-FORM-26 [06-11-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-11-06 |
| 8 | 201911033876-Request Letter-Correspondence [12-11-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-11-12 |
| 9 | 201911033876-Form 1 (Submitted on date of filing) [12-11-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-11-12 |
| 10 | 201911033876-Power of Attorney-071119.pdf | 2019-11-13 |
| 11 | 201911033876-OTHERS-071119.pdf | 2019-11-13 |
| 12 | 201911033876-Correspondence-071119.pdf | 2019-11-13 |
| 13 | 201911033876-FORM 3 [06-12-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-12-06 |
| 14 | 201911033876-FORM-9 [16-12-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-12-16 |
| 15 | 201911033876-FORM 18A [17-12-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-12-17 |
| 16 | 201911033876-FER.pdf | 2020-01-14 |
| 17 | 201911033876-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [26-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-26 |
| 18 | 201911033876-Information under section 8(2) [26-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-26 |
| 19 | 201911033876-FORM 13 [26-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-26 |
| 20 | 201911033876-AMMENDED DOCUMENTS [26-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-26 |
| 21 | 201911033876-OTHERS [27-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-27 |
| 22 | 201911033876-FER_SER_REPLY [27-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-27 |
| 23 | 201911033876-ABSTRACT [27-02-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-02-27 |
| 24 | 201911033876-PatentCertificate22-06-2020.pdf | 2020-06-22 |
| 25 | 201911033876-IntimationOfGrant22-06-2020.pdf | 2020-06-22 |
| 26 | 201911033876-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [12-01-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-01-12 |
| 27 | 201911033876-FORM-26 [12-01-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-01-12 |
| 28 | 201911033876-FORM 13 [12-01-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-01-12 |
| 29 | 201911033876-AMENDED DOCUMENTS [12-01-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-01-12 |
| 30 | 201911033876-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [03-10-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-10-03 |
| 1 | SearchStrategy_14-01-2020.pdf |
| 2 | Documentuploaded_14-01-2020.pdf |