Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Simulator For Simulating Traffic Scenarios And Providing Control For Railways At A Station

Abstract: A simulator system for simulating traffic scenarios and control for railways, within a railway network, with respect to at least a first station and at least an adjacent station, said system comprising: - first database means adapted to store mapped information with respect to track profiles within said network; - second database means adapted to store station profiles of a first station and adjacent stations with respect to said mapped track profiles; - third database means adapted to store signal profiles within said network; - fourth database means adapted to store train movement data within said network; - first selection means adapted to select a pre-determined area within said network; - second selection means adapted to select track profile from said first database means with respect to said selected area, station profile from said second database means with respect to said selected area, signal profile from said third database means with respect to said selected area, train movement data from said fourth database means with respect to said selected area; - collating means adapted to collate said selected data based on user input or pre-defined rules; - visual representation means adapted to show track profile, station profile, and signal profile of a selected area within said network; - processing means adapted to process collated data in order to simulate envisioned or plausible situations of train movement within said network; - display means adapted to display said processed collated data; - controlling means adapted to virtually provide control and response in reference to a plurality of virtual representations and display of train movement within said network; and - result calculating means adapted to correlate inputs from said controlling means with a pre-defined result of the simulated control.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
01 October 2009
Publication Number
13/2012
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMMUNICATION
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LIMITED
BELAPUR BHAVAN, SECTOR 11, CBD BELAPUR, NAVI MUMBAI 400 614, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA.

Inventors

1. ALUR LAKSHMANAN PRABHAKAR
KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD, SHIRWAD, KARWAR KARNATAKA 581 306, INDIA.

Specification

FORM-2
THE PATENTS ACT, 1970
(39 of 1970)
&
THE PATENTS RULES, 2003
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
(See section 10 and rule 13)
SIMULATOR FOR SIMULATING TRAFFIC SCENARIOS AND PROVIDING CONTROL FOR RAILWAYS AT A STATION
KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD.,
An Indian Company,
of Belapur Bhavan, Sector 11
CBD, Belapur,
Navi Mumbai 400 614,
Maharashtra, India.
THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION PARTICULARLY DESCRIBES THE INVENTION AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT IS TO BE PERFORMED.

Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to railways.
In particular, this invention relates to traffic control for railways.
Still particularly, this invention relates to a simulator for simulating traffic scenarios and control for railways at a station.
Background of the Invention:
Railways form an essential way of terrestrial transport. Its safety and its efficiency is enabled by its management. Running a multitude of trains on a system requires appropriate planning, monitoring, and executing of tasks within the specified guidelines. Signaling is of prime importance in such a system to ensure its safety. Designing of a robust signaling system and providing the means to monitor it ensures its stability.
Railway signaling is a system used on railways to control traffic safely, for example, to prevent trains from colliding. Trains are uniquely susceptible to collision because, running on fixed rails, they are not capable of avoiding a collision by steering away, as can a road vehicle; furthermore, trains cannot decelerate rapidly, and are frequently operating at speeds where by the time the driver/engineer can see an obstacle, the train cannot stop in time to avoid colliding with it.
When trains are operating in opposing directions on a single-line railroad, meets are scheduled, where each train must wait for the other at a point they can pass. Neither is permitted to move until the other has arrived. If two

trains cannot be running on the same section of track at the same time, then they cannot collide. So railway lines are divided into sections known as block sections, and only one train is normally allowed in each block section at one time. This principle forms the basis of most railway safety systems.
A set of General and Subsidiary Rules (G. & S. R.) in India provide the framework for safe train operation and are followed strictly. To ensure safe reception and dispatch of trains in compliance with G. & S. R. at every station, a panel instrument is in place. This, in combination with block instruments serves the above purpose. Hence an important portion of training of station masters is training on operations of panel and block instruments.
Training modules are relegated to on-the-job sessions. This limits the variety of the nature of problems and scenarios occurring. A trainee without the instructor is confined by the various rules and procedures within which he can operate and learn. With the instructor, the practical know-how is limited to the variety of conditions actually occurring with respect to the surrounding parameters. Hence, it is difficult to train the trainee for complex situations which may have never occurred but have a reasonable chance of occurring.
The hard-version of a signaling system encompasses a complete working panel, up and down block instruments, and a variety of counters.
In Indian Railways, station masters operate a Block Instrument (BI) for obtaining line clear and dispatching a train into the block section under a

system of working called Absolute Block System. In this system of working, it is ensured that a block section (usually a section between two stations) is occupied by only one train in a given moment. This is to ensure that there is no head-on collision or rear-end collision of two trains moving on the same track. For a single line system "Non-Co-operative Tokenless Push Button" block instrument of Podanur type is typically used. For a double line section "SGE Lock and Block" block instrument is typically used. In combination with signaling circuits of the station and block instrument of the adjacent station, the block instrument ensures that a train can be let into a block section only if it satisfied the rules of the Absolute Block System.
The Station Master operates a panel for reception, dispatch, and movement/placement of trains in various running lines of the station. This could either be a "Panel Interlocked" (PI) system or a "Route Relay Interlocked" (RRI) system. In the former system (PI), all points which are used to switch the train from one track to another are first operated independently. Then the governing signals are taken off to set a "route". In the latter system (RRI), the panel enables operation of points and the governing signals in one single operation. Both the above systems are governed by logic which prevents setting conflicting paths within a station that could cause collision between two trains moving in either the same or opposite directions. This logic is contained in a "Selection Table" which is a matrix of all signals, route and point settings. Besides physical infringement and collision, the logic also accounts for "adequate distance" beyond stop signals to buffer against overshooting a signal. This is implemented in the field by a complex and elaborate set-up of points, circuits and relays.

Typically, over a three line station, 15 track circuits and 250 relays are involved.
Conventional method of training includes training directly on such consoles. In a real time panel, a sequence of buttons are used in order to confirm an action to be taken. This sequence of buttons eliminates accidental key presses, and non-confirmed actions are thus eliminated. There is a need for a simulator that simulates the exact working of the panel and block instrument, and provides the same experience.
Prior Art:
U.S. Patent Number 7,143,017 discloses a remote control locomotive simulator which is the control of a locomotive other than the locomotive cab. It does not speak of a simulator for traffic control at stations.
U.S. Patent Number 4,041,283 discloses a method and apparatus for simulating operation and control of a railway train. This invention, too does not describe the traffic control at stations.
U.S. Patent Number 5,200,901 discloses a simulator for air traffic control. An analogy for the railways traffic control at stations is however, not
discussed.
Further limitations of the traditional model room of the prior art include: - complexity and difficulty of creating various failure-scenarios (points, signal, track, point zone track, button stuck) involving manipulating the circuits;

space and cost constraints of providing for such a set-up. This invention seeks to overcome the limitations of the prior art.
Objects of the Invention:
One object of this invention is to provide a means to train trainees aspiring to be station masters.
Another object of this invention is to provide a means to train trainees aspiring to be station masters on a pseudo-platform.
Yet another object of this invention is to adapt to all types of data; normal and abnormal for reducing the response times of a trainee aspiring to be a station master, in order to react to a situation.
A further object of this invention is to train the candidates on data with arbitrary complexity in order to enable the trainee to adapt to a variety of scenarios.
One more object of this invention is to provide a comprehensive training module for training encompassing real-life routine as well as special high-risk scenarios.
An additional object of this invention is to reduce the risks involved with on-the-job training of trainees.

Still, a further object of this invention is to test a trainee to check his progress.
Yet another object of this invention is to test a trainee to check his progress in accordance with his learning sessions.
Still another object of this invention is to provide a means to generate a report of progress of a trainee's training session.
A further object of this invention is to provide an automated means of report generation in order to check a trainee's progress.
The invention, as envisaged provides a means which incorporates all these features onto a computer. Real-time data is archived for training and evaluation purposes.
Summary of the Invention:
According to this invention, there is provided a system for simulating traffic conditions, and more particularly, railway traffic at stations. A satisfactory traffic simulation should be capable of operation in a greatly reduced time scale regardless of the complexity of the traffic problem which can be interconnected to give a representation of a traffic system of arbitrary complexity.
In accordance with one practical embodiment of this invention, a system is disclosed to train a trainee for controlling train movements before allowing them to operate on a real-life platform. This is done, typically by developing

an environment which uses at least partly, previously archived real-time data.
According to this invention, there is provided a simulator system for simulating traffic scenarios and control for railways, within a railway network, with respect to at least a first station and at least an adjacent station, said system comprises:
- first database means adapted to store mapped information with respect to track profiles within said network;
- second database means adapted to store station profiles of a first station and adjacent stations with respect to said mapped track profiles;
- third database means adapted to store signal profiles within said network;
- fourth database means adapted to store train movement data within said network;
- first selection means adapted to select a pre-determined area within said network;
- second selection means adapted to select track profile from said first database means with respect to said selected area, station profile from said second database means with respect to said selected area, signal profile from said third database means with respect to said selected area, train movement data from said fourth database means with respect to said selected area;
- collating means adapted to collate said selected data based on user input or pre-defined rules;
- visual representation means adapted to show track profile, station
profile, and signal profile of a selected area within said network;

- processing means adapted to process collated data in order to simulate envisioned or plausible situations of train movement within said network;
- display means adapted to display said processed collated data;
- controlling means adapted to virtually provide control and response in reference to a plurality of virtual representations and display of train movement within said network; and
- result calculating means adapted to correlate inputs from said
controlling means with a pre-defined result of the simulated control.
Typically, said visual representation of the system in accordance with this invention includes profiles of a station and adjacent stations on either side.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the mapped profile may have different sections as below:
Block Section: It is a portion of the running line between two stations where no train may enter until line clear has been received from the other station.
Overlap Section: It is the portion of the track ahead of the stop signal, which is to be kept clear before clearing the stop signal in the rear.
Typically, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least two main track profiles and two loop track profiles.
Typically, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least an operative up track profile and at least an operative down track profile.

Typically, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least two cross-overs.
Typically, said first database means includes means to simulate interlocked traffic gates at pre-defined instances of said mapped information.
Typically, said system is enabled to provide a comprehensive training module encompassing the functionality of the operating block and station as also the adjacent stations' block instruments.
Typically, train movement data stored in said second memory bank means is real.
Alternatively, train movement data stored in said second memory bank means is surreal.
Typically, said system includes modification means adapted to dynamically modify said track profile and subsequently modify said signaling profile and train movement on said track.
Preferably, the training means is provided with one main line and two loop lines connected to the main line. Alternatively, this feature is further enhanced to accommodate a variety of scenarios with multiple train lines and multiple loop lines.
Typically, said system for training completely emulates the real-time panel instrument working stationed at control stations which include up and down

block instrument working, predictable failure scenarios, and special operations.
Typically, said system in accordance with this invention is adapted to create special high-risk scenarios, for example., collision of trains, and hence, enables a trainee to be trained with quick, efficient and correct response times in a real life situation.
Typically, said controlling means includes a physical panel and a block instrument with operative buttons and keys whose input is fed to the simulator central core through a microcontroller.
Typically, said controlling means includes derailing switch means.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to control interlocked traffic gate of said mapped information.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to provide a master control.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to obtain line clear on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to receive a train on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.

Typically, said controlling means includes means to provide closing signal on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to cancel line clear operation on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to block cancellation on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
Typically, said controlling means includes means to implement defined interlocking rules on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
Typically, said result calculating means comprises:
- a data reference means adapted to store the correct responses for the simulated controls of said virtual representations;
- a first calculating means adapted to calculate a score for said simulated controls with respect to said correct referenced responses;
- a second calculating means adapted to measure the response time taken for
' user to react to said virtual representations;
- a display means adapted to display said calculated scores and said
calculated response times.
Typically, said result calculating means is adapted to record every training session in a graded manner so as to improve response time of a trainee. The recording of these responses via a feedback system with or without fuzzy logic helps the trainee to analyze his performance. This feature provides a trainee with an exact quantitative as well as qualitative statement of-his

actions. The recording feature builds the database bank which has archived real-time data as well as surreal data. It also archives the various responses to a given scenario and keeps on adding.
Typically, said result calculating means includes a feedback mechanism which compares and stores every unique event in relation to a test scenario or its responses in order to build/increase the database of events for future use.
Typically, said result calculating means is provided so that an automated evaluation and suggestion of corrective measures in response to a trainee's training session is carried out. This feature helps in enhancing the efficiency and correctness of a trainee's response ability.
Typically, said system is provided to create test scenarios for grading a plurality of trainees in accordance with their response times, uniqueness of response, and types of responses. The test scenarios have an increasing degree of complexity which enables a trainee to test and train his responsiveness and sharpen his skills.
According to this invention, multiple versions of said system for simulating control of signals are envisaged. Each version is an improvement over the previous.
In accordance with one version of the system for simulating control of signals within a railway, there is provided a road station layout in a single line context, with tracks and signals.

In accordance with another embodiment (version) of the system for simulating control of signals within a railway, there is provided a double line section comprising the following:
- controlling means for providing various control options depending
upon the way in which the controlling means is used. Typically, this is
achieved by the examples below:
- double clicking a first button represents keeping the button pressed;
- single clicking a first button represents pressing the button;
- clicking a second button to display options based on the co-ordinates
of the controlling means. Typically, said control means may be a computer mouse adapted to perform said functions.
- representation means for representing the function of the controlling means that is selected by virtue of its control;
- master clearing means for clearing controls related to unintended operations;
- selection means adapted to select function of working in PI mode or RRI mode;
- panel instrument means comprising:

- means for providing functions for station master's keys;
- means for controlling operation of points;
- means for calling on signal operations;
- means for performing signal shunt operations;
- three button means for cancellation of route;
- means for crank handle operations;
- means for interlocked gate operations;

- means for monitoring train movement with means for automatic
route release;
- means for implementation of all interlocking routes;
- audio simulation means for aurally communicating signal route point indications, main and generator supply indications, signal and point failure acknowledgements, control means checking indication, main filament checking indication and the like;
- means to determine and communicate failure scenarios relating to signal failures, point failures, track failures, point zone track failures, control means failure, and the like;
- emergency means enabled to handle emergency point operations, emergency crank handle extraction, emergency sub-route cancellation and the like;
Typically, said controlling means includes a plurality of keys adapted to be simultaneously stroked for each of defined controls.
Typically, said system includes a viewing means adapted to provide a view of the exact present state of a signal by using a function of the controlling
means.
Typically, said system includes a network of computers; one for each station, to represent adjacent stations and the main station for implementing line clear and dispatch/reception operations between these computers.
In accordance with this invention, the control means is simulated to map the exact functions of the original keyboard wherein a multiplicity of key

strokes are required to enable an action. In a hardwired board controlling actual train signals, this feature is enabled. The same feature is now incorporated as a part of this simulator system for precision training of the trainees learning to be station masters and be adept at controlling the traffic movement. According to this invention, there is an incorporation of a physical panel with buttons similar to the actual panel (instead of input operations through mouse clicks) for a real feel. Also, simultaneous pressing of buttons is implemented exactly as in a real life scenario as against double click of a button on the screen followed by single click on another button as implemented in the simulators of the prior art. A microcontroller has been used to interpret the input, which is then fed to the main application means. Thus, the trainee is exposed to complex schemes of functioning, by nature of the scenarios presented to him, as well as by the nature of control mechanisms provided to him, thus aiding him/her to multitask, and be aware of all scenarios; either in normal mode or in emergency mode.
Typically, there is provided a viewing means adapted to provide a view of the exact present state of a signal by using a function of the controlling means. This is not available to a station master in conventional training on panel.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the system of this invention, controller means may be adapted to include the following mechanism and procedures:
- Locking Mechanisms:

- Approach Locking Mechanism: This is provided to prevent the
signal from being taken off when it is put back to danger in face of an approaching train and to prevent the route being altered.
- Dead Approach Locking Mechanism: If a sufficient length of track
circuit is not provided in rear of a signal like home signal, starter signal (from goods' yard) and shunt signal (from sidings), approach locking is not provided. In such cases, another type of approach locking is adopted called Dead Approach Locking. It becomes effective on the put back of signal and does not depend on approach of train.
- Cancellation Mechanism:
- 3 Button Cancellation Mechanism: The three button cancellation
releases or normalizes all the route sections as well as the overlap if set at the same time. The locking becomes free soon after the 3 button panel operation for route release, if track circuits in approach of signal are not occupied, nor failed and the signal is at ON position. If they are occupied, the route release takes place after a pre-determined time delay.
- Emergency Cancellation Mechanism: This is required when one
needs to cancel the route which is set and cannot be cancelled using 3 button cancellation mechanism. There is a need for the signal inspector to be present and the signal inspector's key to be inserted into the slot.
- Route Indicating Mechanism: It indicates a signal to the driver for indicating the appropriate route on which the train is being received,
- Visual Indicating Mechanism: These are the signaling aspects. Typical examples of this can be red signal for dead stop, single yellow

signal for proceeding with caution and being prepared to stop at the next stop signal, double yellow signal for proceeding with attention and being prepared to pass next stop signal at restricted speed, green signal for proceeding, and the like signals. - Sensing Mechanism: adapted to sense the presence of a vehicle on a portion of a track, whether the track is occupied or not, and the like.
In accordance with yet another version of the system for simulating control of signals within a railway, there is provided a network of computers; one for each station, to represent adjacent stations and the main station for implementing line clear and dispatch/reception operations between these computers. This system supplements/replaces a traditional room model.
Typically, this system is adapted for a single line version. Alternatively, this system is adapted for a double line version.
Any number of computers over a network can now be connected to simulate a route of stations. Granting of line clear, dispatch, reception, and the like is provided by means of controlling means. Typically, a physical panel and block instrument with buttons as controlling means is designed similar to the actual panel and block instrument. This gives a realistic feel to the trainees.
Some of the enhancements of this system are:
1) Buttons and failure indicators in the panel for signal and point failures;
2) Safety Review Panel indications on the panel;
3) Main/generator indicators and button in the panel;

4) Normal Checking Relay indicator in the panel;
5) Simulating main power supply failure mode;
6) Simulating button stuck condition;
7) Means to drag and drop collars in the panel and functionality;
8) Audio and Visual indications for signal failures, point failures;
9) Static online examination database design, and score calculation means.
Brief Descriptions of the Accompanying Drawing:
The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Figure 1 relates to the entire simulator setup;
Figure 2 relates to the input and output parameters of the simulation means;
Figure 3 relates to the feedback and grading mechanism for the simulation means; and
Figure 4 illustrates a schematic of the system of this invention.
Detailed Description of the Accompanying Drawings:
Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings illustrates a system for simulating control of signals within a railway network. It comprises a simulation means (SIM) which includes a first memory bank means (FMB) adapted to store mapped information with respect to track profiles, station profiles and signal profiles within said network, a second memory bank means (SMB) adapted to store train movement data within said network, a selection means

(SLNM) adapted to select a pre-determined area within said network. The system further includes a visual representation means (VRM) adapted to show track profile, station profile, and signal profile of a selected area within said network, a processing means (PC) adapted to fabricate envisioned or plausible situations of train movement within said network, a controlling means (M/KB) adapted to virtually control and respond to a plurality of virtual representations of train movement within said network, and a result calculating means (RCM) adapted to correlate inputs from said controlling means with a pre-defined result of the simulated control.
Figure 2 of the accompanying drawings illustrates the simulation means (SIM) in accordance with this invention along with the input-output consoles and features. The Train Movement block (TM) in conjunction with the database (DB) of events generates a plurality of events; either normal (N) or abnormal (AN) in nature. The various route scenarios (R) and manual triggers (TG) provide a variety of arbitrary datasets for learning. These input parameters are simulated in the simulation block (SIM) and provide the end-user i.e. the trainee (SM) various kinds of outputs upon which he can act.
Figure 3 illustrates the Result Calculating Means (RCM) in conjunction with the simulator means (SIM). The Result Calculating Means (RCM) receives and records all actions in relation to a trainee. It has a data reference means adapted to store true responses of archived real-time events (RD) and the true responses of any unique scenario or response method in a new data bank (ND). A trainee's (SM) responses are compared with the stored responses (RD, ND) with respect to static and dynamic parameters and in response to previous training sessions. This provides a better qualitative and quantitative

analysis for a trainee. It further includes a first calculating means (FCM) adapted to calculate a score for said simulated controls with respect to said correct referenced responses, and a second calculating means (SCM) adapted to measure the response time taken for user to react to said virtual representations.
Figure 4 illustrates a schematic of the system of this invention. A central core (10) is present which represents the panel for providing simulations and controls. Typically, a physical panel (20), with buttons, and physical block instruments (30, 40) with controlling means (140) is designed similar to the actual panel and block instrument. The controlling means (140) is adapted to recognise a plurality of keystrokes (i.e. simultaneous pressing of buttons of a controlling means), by means of input interpretation means (150), for a command to be effected, and preparing the trainee for real life situations. This gives a realistic feel to the trainees. Adjacent stations having separate cores (50, 60) are provided and connected to said central core (10) via a networking means. Various databases such as a scenario database (70) adapted to prepare various permutations and combinations of simulated scenarios, a training database (80) adapted to provide training modules and tests, an object state database (90), a signaling table database (100) adapted for providing signaling mechanisms in relation to said scenario database (70), are provided. A screen (110) for viewing simulated movement of train, and an audio means (120) for providing aural feeds of alarms or signals is provided. The hardware (130) refers to the microcontroller.
Advantages of this Invention:

1. Provision has been made in the system in accordance with this invention to simulate various defects such as track down, point flashing etc.
2. Obstacles can be placed wherever required on the various track segments in the system in accordance with this invention.
3. The system in accordance with this invention includes a variety of features as is seen on the control panel.
4. Actual train movement is simulated onto the system database.
5. The system in accordance with this invention aims to better the response times of trainees to react to a scenario.
6. The system in accordance with this invention provides a dynamic learning environment with increasing complexity of modules for advanced learning and better honing of response skills.
7. Demonstration of the system in accordance with this invention can be given either by an LCD projector in class or on individual PCs.
8. The system in accordance with this invention can be deployed on a web server (intranet/internet) for wider accessibility and centralized implementation of modifications.
9. Initial cost of the simulator system, according to this invention, is relatively low as compared with physical working models being currently used, as general purpose PCs, displays and cheaply/commonly available electronics such as micro controllers are used.
10. There is negligible maintenance requirement (consequently, negligible maintenance cost) as the system mainly includes simulated means with physical inputs from panel key-board and block instruments.
11. Various scenarios (especially failure scenarios such as points flashing, signal flashing, track down etc) can be instantly and elegantly created.

12. The number of simultaneous trainees in a practical classroom situation need not now be restricted by the physical model size.
13. Taking advantage of the virtually non-limiting possibilities of representations in the current simulator system, elegant additions such as Loco Pilots' view of signals have been incorporated in the simulators.
While considerable emphasis has been placed herein on the particular features of the preferred embodiment and the improvisation with regards to it, it will be appreciated that various modifications can be made in the preferred embodiment without departing from the principles of the invention. These and other modifications in the nature of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the disclosure herein, whereby it is to be distinctly understood that the foregoing descriptive matter is to be interpreted merely as illustrative of the invention and not as a limitation.

We claim,
1. A simulator system for simulating traffic scenarios and control for railways, within a railway network, with respect to at least a first station and at least an adjacent station, said system comprising:
- first database means adapted to store mapped information with respect to track profiles within said network;
- second database means adapted to store station profiles of a first station and adjacent stations with respect to said mapped track profiles;
- third database means adapted to store signal profiles within said
network;
- fourth database means adapted to store train movement data within said network;
- first selection means adapted to select a pre-determined area within said network;
- second selection means adapted to select track profile from said first database means with respect to said selected area, station profile from said second database means with respect to said selected area, signal profile from said third database means with respect to said selected area, train movement data from said fourth database means with respect to said selected area;
- collating means adapted to collate said selected data based on user input or pre-defined rules;
- visual representation means adapted to show track profile, station
profile, and signal profile of a selected area within said network;
- processing means adapted to process collated data in order to simulate
envisioned or plausible situations of train movement within said network;

- display means adapted to display said processed collated data;
- controlling means adapted to virtually provide control and response in reference to a plurality of virtual representations and display of train movement within said network; and
- result calculating means adapted to correlate inputs from said
controlling means with a pre-defined result of the simulated control.
2. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least one main track profiles and two loop track profiles.
3. system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least two main track profiles and two loop track profiles.
4. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least an operative up track profile and at least an operative down track profile.
5. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said first database means includes data storage relating to at least two cross-overs.
6. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said first database means includes means to simulate interlocked traffic gates at pre-deimed instances of said mapped information.

7. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said visual representation includes profiles of a station and adjacent stations on either side.
8. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, train movement data stored in said second memory bank means is real.
9. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, train movement data stored in said second memory bank means is surreal.
10.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes a physical panel and a block instrument with operative buttons and keys whose input is fed to the simulator central core through a microcontroller.
11 .A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes derailing switch means.
12.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to control interlocked traffic gate of said mapped information.
13.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to provide a master control.
14.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to obtain line clear on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.

15.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to receive a train on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
16.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to provide closing signal on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
17.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to cancel line clear operation on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
18.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to block cancellation on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
19.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes means to implement defined interlocking rules on a pre-defined portion of said mapped information.
20. A system as claimed in claiml wherein, said controlling means includes train acceleration means adapted to provide acceleration control for a train in reference to said train movement data.
2LA system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said result calculating means comprises:

- a data reference means adapted to store the correct responses for the simulated controls of said virtual representations;
- a first calculating means adapted to calculate a score for said simulated controls with respect to said correct referenced responses;
- a second calculating means adapted to measure the response time taken for user to react to said virtual representations; and
- a display means adapted to display said calculated scores and said calculated response times.
22. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said system includes means to dynamically modify said track profile and subsequently modify said signaling profile and train movement on said track.
23.A controlling means for providing various pre-defined control options, said controlling means comprising:
- first button, adapted to be double clicked, for keeping the button
pressed;
- first button, adapted to be single clicked;
- second button, adapt be single clicked, to display options based on
the co-ordinates of said controlling means.
- representation means for representing the function of the controlling means that is selected by virtue of its control;
- master clearing means for clearing controls related to unintended operations;
- selection means adapted to select mode of working from pre-defined Panel Interlocked mode or Route Relay Interlocked mode;
- panel instrument means comprising:

- means for providing functions for station master's keys;
- means for controlling operation of points;
- means for calling on signal operations;
- means for performing signal shunt operations;
- three button means for cancellation of route;
- means for crank handle operations;
- means for interlocked gate operations;
- means for monitoring train movement with means for automatic
route release;
- means for implementation of all interlocking routes;
- audio simulation means for aurally communicating signal route point indications, main and generator supply indications, signal and point failure acknowledgements, control means checking indication, main filament checking indication and the like;
- means to determine and communicate failure scenarios relating to signal failures, point failures, track failures, point zone track failures, control means failure; and
- emergency means enabled to handle emergency point operations, emergency crank handle extraction, emergency sub-route cancellation.
24.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said controlling means includes a plurality of keys adapted to be simultaneously stroked for each of defined controls.
25.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said system includes a viewing means adapted to provide a view of the exact present state of a signal by using a function of the controlling means.

26.A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein, said system includes a network of computers; one for each station, to represent adjacent stations and the main station for implementing line clear and dispatch/reception operations between these computers.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2287-MUM-2009- AFR.pdf 2022-09-20
1 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 1(19-10-2010).pdf 2010-10-19
2 2287-MUM-2009-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2018-10-30
2 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(19-10-2010).pdf 2010-10-19
3 Other Patent Document [07-10-2016(online)].pdf 2016-10-07
3 2287-MUM-2009-ABSTRACT(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
4 abstract1.jpg 2018-08-10
4 2287-MUM-2009-CLAIMS(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
5 2287-mum-2009-power of attorney.pdf 2018-08-10
5 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
6 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 5(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
6 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(26-7-2013).pdf 2018-08-10
7 2287-mum-2009-form 3.pdf 2018-08-10
7 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(9-8-2011).pdf 2018-08-10
8 2287-mum-2009-correspondence.pdf 2018-08-10
8 2287-mum-2009-form 2.pdf 2018-08-10
9 2287-MUM-2009-DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE)-(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
10 2287-mum-2009-form 2(title page).pdf 2018-08-10
11 2287-mum-2009-description(provisional).pdf 2018-08-10
11 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
12 2287-MUM-2009-DRAWING(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
12 2287-mum-2009-form 2(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
13 2287-mum-2009-drawing.pdf 2018-08-10
13 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 18(26-7-2013).pdf 2018-08-10
14 2287-MUM-2009-FER.pdf 2018-08-10
14 2287-mum-2009-form 1.pdf 2018-08-10
15 2287-MUM-2009-FER.pdf 2018-08-10
15 2287-mum-2009-form 1.pdf 2018-08-10
16 2287-mum-2009-drawing.pdf 2018-08-10
16 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 18(26-7-2013).pdf 2018-08-10
17 2287-mum-2009-form 2(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
17 2287-MUM-2009-DRAWING(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
18 2287-mum-2009-description(provisional).pdf 2018-08-10
18 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 2(TITLE PAGE)-(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
19 2287-mum-2009-form 2(title page).pdf 2018-08-10
20 2287-MUM-2009-DESCRIPTION(COMPLETE)-(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
21 2287-mum-2009-correspondence.pdf 2018-08-10
21 2287-mum-2009-form 2.pdf 2018-08-10
22 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(9-8-2011).pdf 2018-08-10
22 2287-mum-2009-form 3.pdf 2018-08-10
23 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(26-7-2013).pdf 2018-08-10
23 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 5(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
24 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
24 2287-mum-2009-power of attorney.pdf 2018-08-10
25 2287-MUM-2009-CLAIMS(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
25 abstract1.jpg 2018-08-10
26 Other Patent Document [07-10-2016(online)].pdf 2016-10-07
26 2287-MUM-2009-ABSTRACT(24-9-2010).pdf 2018-08-10
27 2287-MUM-2009-CORRESPONDENCE(19-10-2010).pdf 2010-10-19
27 2287-MUM-2009-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2018-10-30
28 2287-MUM-2009-FORM 1(19-10-2010).pdf 2010-10-19
28 2287-MUM-2009- AFR.pdf 2022-09-20

Search Strategy

1 search_05-01-2018.pdf