Abstract: A solid substrate for the extraction stabilization and storage of proteins is provided. The substrate includes: a polysaccharide such as melezitose under a substantially dry state. The substrate is configured to extract proteins from a sample and stabilize the extracted proteins in a dry format under ambient conditions for a prolonged period of time. Methods for collecting and recovering the proteins stored in the dry solid substrate are also described.
SUBSTRATES AND METHODS FOR COLLECTION,
STABILIZATION AND ELUTION OF BIOMOLECULES
FIELD
[0001] The invention relates to dry solid substrates for collection, stabilization and elution of
biomolecules from a biological sample. The invention further relates to methods for collection,
stabilization and elution of biomolecules from a biological sample from the dry solid substrates.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Preserving the structural and functional integrity of biomolecules during isolation or
purification from a biological sample is essential for various downstream applications including
analyte detection, sensing, forensic, diagnostic or therapeutic applications, and the like. The
extraction and stabilization of proteins, peptides or amino acids derived from a biological
sample are sensitive to a number of environmental factors including, but are not limited to,
solution pH, temperature, and the ubiquitous presence of various proteases. Consequently,
proteins or peptides in solution states are typically stored under refrigeration (e.g. 4°C, -20°C, or
-80°C) to prevent hydrolysis and enzymatic degradation and to preserve the integrity of protein
structure or function.
[0003] Dry-state technologies claiming successful collection and preservation of proteins or
peptides in dry formats typically require protein to be "pre-purified" and "concentrated" from a
sample prior to storage. Other dry-state technologies for the preservation of proteins in dry
formats require additional drying facilities (e.g. forced air flow, lyophilization). These methods
are therefore not conducive to direct collection and stabilization of proteins or peptides from a
sample (e.g., a biological sample) without additional and significant processing steps.
[0004] Proteins or peptides are prone to denaturation and consequently tend to lose biological
activity or epitope recognition during storage. Proteins that are targets of different analytical
tests, such as biomarkers or biological therapeutic drugs, may be present in low quantities in
unpurified states. Thus, methods for maximizing the recovery of protein analytes of interest are
highly desirable. Degradation of protein or peptide may be slowed or prevented using chemical
additives that, for example, inhibit protease activity. However, the presence of chemical
additives may affect down-stream analytical techniques including mass spectroscopy and
immunoassays.
[0005] Untreated cellulose paper substrates, such as, 903 or 3IETF papers (Whatman™, GE
Healthcare) or Grade 226 paper (Ahlstrom, PerkinElmer) are used widely for preservation of
enzymes, antibodies, proteins, peptides, and amino acids in dried blood spots for analytical
purposes such as neonatal testing. However, the recovery of analytes from untreated cellulose
substrates and subsequent biological activity of said analytes, particularly proteins that are prone
to degradation, are often not sufficient. Dried specimens, such as dried blood spot samples used
in neonatal testing, are generally stored under refrigeration to maintain analyte stability.
Analytes which can be eluted inefficiently from dried blood spots may be interpreted in the art
as unstable targets due to poor functional recovery. Supplementing different chemical fillers to
stabilize proteins has been reported in the art, however the fillers have limited ability to recover
and stabilize sensitive proteins.
[0006] Accordingly, compositions and methods which enable collection and extraction of
biomolecules including proteins, peptides or amino acids from a biological sample, and then
stabilize the biomolecules under a dry-state and ambient conditions without pre-purification, and
elute the biomolecules in a substantially intact form thereafter for further analysis are highly
desirable.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0007] One embodiment of a solid substrate for extraction, stabilization and elution of
biomolecules, comprises a melezitose under a substantially dry state.
[0008] In another embodiment, a solid substrate for collection, stabilization and elution of
biomolecules, comprises a trisaccharide under a substantially dry state.
[0009] One example of a method for extracting, stabilizing and eluting biomolecules from a
biological sample disposed on a solid substrate, comprises contacting the biological sample to
the substrate; drying the biological sample to a substantially dry state; and eluting the
biomolecules from the biological sample dried on the substrate by rehydrating the substrate in
an elution buffer, wherein the solid substrate comprises melezitose under a substantially dry
state, and optionally one or more lysis reagents, nucleic acid denaturing reagents or
combinations thereof, impregnated therein under a substantially dry state.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWING
[0010] FIG. 1 is a graph showing enhanced elution efficiency of active, non-denatured b -gal
while recovered from a substrate with 15% melezitose compared to unmodified 31-ETF
cellulose.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0011] The embodiments provide suitable matrices and methods for extraction, stabilization
and elution of biomolecules, such as proteins, peptides, amino acids, enzymes, and antibodies.
Biomolecules which are prone to denaturation are therefore difficult to preserve in an intact
form. One or more embodiments of the invention relate to a solid substrate for extraction,
stabilization and elution of biomolecules, wherein the substrate comprises a trisaccharide, such
as melezitose under a substantially dry state. The solid substrate is configured to collect a
biological sample, then extract and stabilize proteins, peptides or amino acids from the sample
for a prolonged period, followed by elution within a single process step. The eluted proteins or
peptides are used in various downstream applications. The substrate is configured to stabilize
proteins or peptides in a substantially dry-state at ambient temperature and substantially retain
the integral structure and/or function of the protein.
[0012] To more clearly and concisely describe the subject matter of the claimed invention,
the following definitions are provided for specific terms, which are used in the following
description and the appended claims. Throughout the specification, exemplification of specific
terms should be considered as non-limiting examples.
[0013] The singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context
clearly dictates otherwise. Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification
and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly
vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a
value modified by a term such as "about" is not to be limited to the precise value specified. In
some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument
for measuring the value. Where necessary, ranges have been supplied, and those ranges are
inclusive of all sub-ranges there between.
[0014] The term "biological sample" as referred to herein includes, but is not limited to,
blood, serum, tissue, and saliva obtained from any organism, including a human. Biological
samples may be obtained by an individual undergoing a self-diagnostic test (e.g., blood glucose
monitoring) or by a trained medical professional through a variety of techniques including, for
example, aspirating blood using a needle or scraping or swabbing a particular area, such as a
lesion on a patient's skin. Methods for collecting various biological samples are well known in
the art. The term "sample" includes biological samples as defined above, but also includes, for
example, tissue cultured cells and purified proteins.
[0015] The term, "reducing agents" as referred to herein include any chemical species that
provides electrons to another chemical species. A variety of reducing agents are known in the
art. Exemplary reducing agents include dithiothreitol (DTT), 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME), and
tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Moreover, any combination of these or other reducing
agents may be used. In particular embodiments, the reducing agent is TCEP.
[0016] The term "buffer" as used herein includes, for example, 2-Amino-2-hydroxymethylpropane-
l,3-diol (Tris), 2-(N -morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), 3-(Nmorpholino)
propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), citrate buffers, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-lpiperazineethanesulfonic
acid (HEPES), and phosphate buffers. This list of potential buffers is
for illustrative purposes only. The pH of the buffer selected for use in the compositions and
methods disclosed herein is typically in the range of 3 to 10. In some embodiments, the pH of
the buffer used herein is in a range of 6 to 9, or in some other embodiments, the pH of the buffer
is in a range of 7 to 8.
[0017] One embodiment of a solid substrate for collection, stabilization and elution of
biomolecules, comprises a trisaccharide under a substantially dry state. The trisaccharide may
be selected from melezitose, raffmose, maltotriulose, isomaltotriose, nigerotriose, maltotriose,
ketose or combinations thereof.
[0018] One or more embodiments of a solid substrate comprise a melezitose under a
substantially dry state. Melezitose is a non-reducing trisaccharide sugar, having a molecular
weight of 504, 44 g/mol. In one or more embodiments, the solid substrate comprises melezitose,
wherein a concentration of the melezitose is in range of about 10 to 30%. In one embodiment,
the concentration of melezitose is 15%. The melezitose may be impregnated in the substrate. In
some embodiments, the impregnated melezitose concentration in the substrate is between 10 to
30%. In some other embodiments, 15% melezitose is impregnated in the substrate. The
substrate may be passively coated or covalently-modified with melezitose. In some other
embodiments, the substrate is coated with a 15% solution of melezitose. The substrate with
melezitose has shown high stability of the proteins, as well as provide higher yield, as described
in Example 2.
[0019] In one or more examples, the substrate is further impregnated with one or more
reagents, such as lysis reagents, buffer reagents or reducing agents. In some embodiments, the
impregnated reagents comprise cell lytic reagents, biomolecule stabilizing reagents such as
protein-stabilizing reagents, protein storage chemicals and combinations thereof impregnated
therein under a substantially dry state.
[0020] The substrate is also configured to extract proteins or peptides from a biological
sample and preserve that in a substantially dry state at ambient temperature. As used herein, the
term "substantially dry state" refers to drying the extracted biomolecules to have approximately
less than 2% of water content. Similarly, the reagents are impregnated in the substrate in a
substantially dry state.
[0021] "Incorporation" of the compositions into the substrate includes, but is not limited to,
the "dipping" procedure described below. In some embodiments, such methods accomplish
incorporation of the composition into the dry solid substrate. Following incorporation of the
composition into the dry solid substrate, the solid substrate is dried using any appropriate
method.
[0022] In one or more embodiments, the substrate comprises lysis reagents. The lysis
reagents may comprise detergents, chaotropes, denaturants or combinations thereof. Without
intending to be limited to a particular denaturant, it may be categorized as either weak or strong
lytic reagents depending on their biophysical properties and ability to completely inhibit
biological enzyme activity (e.g. proteases). In some embodiments, weak protein denaturants
(e.g. detergent) may be used for lysing cells and disrupting protein-protein interactions without
denaturing proteins. Numerous lysis reagents are known in the art and may be selected for use
in the compositions and methods described herein. Without intending to be limited to a
particular lysis reagents, exemplary lysis reagents include guanidinium thiocyanate,
guanidinium hydrochloride, sodium thiocyanate, potassium thiocyanate, arginine, sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS), urea or a combination thereof.
[0023] As noted, the lysis reagents may include detergents, wherein exemplary detergents
may be categorized as ionic detergents, non-ionic detergents, or zwitterionic detergents. The
ionic detergent may comprise anionic detergent such as, sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) or
cationic detergent, such as ethyl trimethyl ammonium bromide. Non-limiting examples of nonionic
detergent for cell lysis include TritonX-100, NP-40, Brij 35, Tween 20, Octyl glucoside,
Octyl thioglucoside or digitonin. Some zwitterionic detergents may comprise 3-[(3-
Cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-l-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and 3-[(3-
Cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy- 1-propanesulfonate (CHAPSO).
[0024] In one or more embodiments, the lysis reagent comprises a thiocyanate salt. One or
more embodiments of the substrate comprises a thiocyanate salt impregnated in a dry state.
Exemplary thiocyanate salts include, but are not limited to, guanidinium thiocyanate, sodium
thiocyanate, potassium thiocyanate or combinations thereof. In some other embodiments, the
lysis reagent is selected from guanidinium thiocyanate, sodium thiocyanate, sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) or combinations thereof.
[0025] In one or more embodiments, the substrate maintains stability and integrity of the
protein at a desired level after extraction from a biological sample. In one embodiment, the
substrate is impregnated with one or more protein stabilizing reagents. These stabilizing
reagents may include protease inhibitors, buffer, or chelating agents (e.g EDTA).
[0026] The digestion of recovered proteins in the presence of proteases may be avoided by
adding one or more protease inhibitors to the substrate, wherein the protease inhibitors may be
added externally or may be impregnated in the substrate. In one embodiment, impregnated
protease inhibitors may be activated upon wetting of the dry substrate. In some embodiments,
the substrate further comprises a protease inhibitor, wherein the protease inhibitor is synthetic or
occurs naturally (e.g. naturally-occurring peptide or protein) and comprises aprotinin, bestatin,
chymostatin, leupeptin, alpha-2-macroglobulin, pepstatin, phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, Nethylmaleimide,
ethylenediaminetetraacetid acid, antithrombin, or combinations thereof. In one
example, an addition of such protease inhibitors enhances the stability of the proteins in both
liquid state and dry-formats by inhibiting the proteases or peptidases.
[0027] Certain embodiments of the substrate comprise buffer reagents in a dry-state, which
may be re-hydrated during the extraction process. Examples of these buffers include, but are not
limited to, 2-Amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-l,3-diol (Tris), 2-(N -morpholino) ethanesulfonic
acid (MES), 3-(N -morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS), citrate buffers, 4-(2-
hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), phosphate buffers or combinations
thereof. As noted, the substrate provides a pH of 6 to 8 on hydration, which enables extraction
of biomolecules from the biological samples and stabilization of the extracted biomolecules.
The hydration may be achieved by adding a sample, water or any other solution (e.g. a buffer
solution). One or more embodiments of the substrate provide a pH in a range from 2 to 7 on
hydration. In some embodiments, the substrate provides a pH in a range from 7 to 10 on
hydration. In one embodiment, the substrate provides a pH range from 6 to 8 upon hydration.
[0028] In some embodiments, the substrate further comprises at least one reducing agent,
wherein the reducing agent is selected from the group consisting of dithiothreitol (DTT), 2-
mercaptoethanol (2-ME), tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP) and combinations thereof.
[0029] In some embodiments, the substrate comprises one or more chelating agents. The
chelating agents may be selected from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid,
ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), or combinations thereof.
[0030] In some embodiments, the substrate further comprises a polysaccharide. The
polysaccharide may be selected from dextran, Ficoll®, chitosan, amylopectin, alginate,
carboxymethyl cellulose, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the polysaccharide is
Ficoll®. In one embodiment, the substrate further comprises 15% solution of Illustra™ Ready-
To-Go (RTG) components from GE Healthcare.
[0031] The substrate enables collection, extraction and storage of proteins or peptides
without solubilizing the substrate material. The solid substrate may be selected from the group
consisting of a nitrocellulose membrane, a cellulose membrane, a cellulose acetate membrane, a
regenerated cellulose membrane, a nitrocellulose mixed ester membranes, a polyethersulfone
membrane, a nylon membrane, a polyolefm membrane, a polyester membrane, a polycarbonate
membrane, a polypropylene membrane, a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, a polyethylene
membrane, a polystyrene membrane, a polyurethane membrane, a polyphenylene oxide
membrane, a poly(tetrafiuoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene membrane, glass fiber and any
combination of two or more of the above membranes.
[0032] The solid substrate may be porous. In one embodiment, the solid substrate is a porous
cellulose paper, such as a cellulose substrate from Whatman™. In one example, the cellulose
substrate from Whatman™ comprises 903-cellulose, FTA™ or FTA™ Elute.
[0033] As noted, the solid substrate comprises the composition in a dry state and also
preserves the extracted proteins under dry conditions. The use of a dry solid substrate for
extraction and storage is advantageous over liquid-based extraction, because the dry substrate
ensures minimal volumetric dilution of the sample applied to the substrate. A liquid-based
extraction may dilute the concentration of the sample in an excess volume of stabilizing reagent.
In contrast, a dry solid substrate for extracting and stabilizing biomolecules maintains the
concentration of the sample, as well as the extracted biomolecules, and eliminates issues, such
as sample degradation, that are related to improper dilution of sample in an insufficient volume
of liquid preservative. In addition, the solid substrate comprises a fixed composition of the dry
reagents, which enables efficient extraction of biomolecules, such as proteins, peptides or amino
acids upon hydration, followed by stabilization of the extracted biomolecules at ambient
temperature.
[0034] The terms "ambient condition" or "ambient temperature" are interchangeably used
hereinafter. As used herein, the term "ambient temperature" refers to a temperature in a range
between 0°C to 60°C. In one or more embodiments, the ambient temperature is room
temperature. In some embodiments, the substrate is configured to store or preserve proteins
under ambient temperature in a dried state.
[0035] As noted, the solid substrate is configured to store or preserve proteins under dry-state
for prolonged period. The term "configured to" or "configured for" is referred to herein as the
structure or composition of the substrate that enables the substrate to extract and store proteins
for periods of time at ambient temperature. The terms "storage" or "preservation" may be
interchangeably used herein with respect to maintaining the extracted proteins in a format
suitable for further analysis. More specifically, the proteins may be stored or preserved in a
solid substrate, wherein the substrate ensures maintaining the integrity of the molecules.
[0036] In some embodiments, the substrate is a solid phase extraction substrate. A substrate,
where the solid phase extraction method is used, is referred to herein as a solid phase extraction
substrate. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) technology has been leveraged to reduce the extraction
times of high purity proteins for sequencing and other applications. The solid phase extraction
is an extraction method that uses a solid phase and a liquid phase to isolate one or more
molecules of the same type, or different types, from a material. The substrate is used, for
example, to purify a sample upstream of a chromatographic separation or other analytical
method.
[0037] In some examples, the substrate permits the storage of proteins, which are prone to
degradation, in a dry format (e.g., on a solid substrate) at ambient temperatures. In one or more
embodiments, the substrate is configured to provide improved stability and elution for
biomolecules at ambient temperatures. In some embodiments, the substrate is configured to
provide improved stability to the biomolecules during storage of at least one month to three
months at ambient temperature between 20 to 22°C.
[0038] The substrate is configured to store proteins in a dry format at ambient temperature
under substantially intact form. The term "form" of the proteins refers to the integral structure
or function of the proteins.
[0039] In some embodiments, the dried reagents impregnated in the substrate are hydrated by
adding a buffer, water or a sample. In one embodiment, the impregnated dried reagents are
hydrated by a sample, more specifically a biological sample, which is disposed on the substrate
for extraction or storage of proteins. In some other embodiments, in addition to a sample, water
or buffer is added to hydrate the substrate and reconstitute or activate the reagents embedded in
the substrate. In some embodiments, the hydration of the substrate generates an appropriate pH
for extraction of proteins on the substrate. In some embodiments, the hydration further results in
reconstituting the reagents, such as cell-lysis reagents, protein stabilizing reagents, reducing
agents, buffer reagents that are present in a dried form in the substrate.
[0040] Methods for extracting, stabilizing and eluting biomolecules from a biological sample
disposed on a solid substrate are provided herein. An example of a method comprises
contacting the biological sample to the substrate, wherein the substrate comprises melezitose
under a substantially dry state, and one or more lysis reagents, nucleic acid denaturing reagents
or combinations thereof impregnated therein under a substantially dry state. Non-limiting
examples of the term "contacting the biological sample" include, applying a sample or disposing
a sample on the substrate using a pipet, catheter, syringe or conduit. In some embodiments, the
sample may be poured onto the substrate. The method further comprises drying the biological
sample to a substantially dry state. For elution, the biomolecules are eluted from the biological
sample dried on the substrate by rehydrating the substrate in an elution buffer.
[0041] The term "extraction" refers to any method for separating or isolating the proteins
from a sample, more particularly from a biological sample. The term "extraction" and
"collection" are interchangeably used herein. Biomolecules such as proteins and peptides may
be released from a cell by cell-lysis. In one embodiment, the proteins may be released during
evaporative cell-lysis. In another embodiment, the cells are lysed upon contact with the
substrate comprising cell lysis reagents. Contacting a biological sample comprising cells to the
substrate results in cell lysis which releases proteins, for example by using FTA™ or FTA™
Elute cellulose papers.
[0042] As noted, the method further comprises drying the biological sample to a substantially
dry state, wherein the dried sample may be stored on the substrate for a longer period of time.
The solid substrate is dried using any appropriate method, such as air-drying or vacuum-drying.
The sample dried substrate may be stored for several weeks or months, and depending on the
requirement, proteins or peptides may be eluted from the dried sample on the substrate.
[0043] In one embodiment, the method further comprises storing the extracted proteins on
the solid substrate in a substantially dry state at ambient temperature. In some embodiments, the
proteins may be stored for more than one month time period. In some embodiments, the
proteins may be stored for more than a six months period. As some of the proteins or peptides
are prone to degradation, the extraction and preservation using the substrate is useful and the
recovered proteins or peptides may further be used for various downstream applications.
[0044] As noted, the method further comprises eluting the biomolecules from the biological
sample dried on the substrate by rehydrating the substrate in an elution buffer. The term
"elution" refers to recovering the biomolecules, such as protein or peptides from the substrate by
various means. One or more embodiments of the method comprise recovering the biomolecules
from the substrate by solid phase extraction technique. In one or more embodiments, the
proteins are eluted from the solid substrate by rehydrating the substrate in an aqueous solution, a
buffer, or an organic solution, and wherein the proteins are subjected to further analysis. Any
method that enables the elution of the biomolecules from a sample (e.g., an unpurified biological
sample) may be employed. The proteins may be eluted by rehydrating the solid substrate (e.g.,
cellulose paper) in an aqueous solution, a buffer solution as defined above, or an organic
solution. In some embodiments, the proteins are recovered from the solid substrate by
electroelution, electrophoresis, or washing with elution buffer.
[0045] The method delineated above may optionally include a step of washing the substrate
before eluting the proteins from the solid substrate for further analysis. For example, the
substrate may be washed for one or more times with a suitable buffer or water prior to elution of
the proteins.
[0046] In some embodiments, the substrate is configured to provide 70 to 90% recovery on
elution of the biomolecules from the substrate. The elution is performed so that the
biomolecules are eluted in an intact form. In embodiments of the method, the elution of
biomolecules does not require pre-purification of the proteins or peptides for effective
stabilization and preservation. The proteins or peptides may be extracted followed by
stabilization and elution in a single step.
[0047] As noted, the proteins or peptides, which are prone to degradation on long term
storage may be defined in terms of percent recovery of the protein in biologically active state.
The protein that is prone to degradation is defined as, a protein which has less than about 60%
recovery, or has less than about 40% recovery in a biologically active state after storage in a
substrate for one week at a room temperature, wherein the substrate is devoid of any reagents.
[0048] In some embodiments, the entire method of using the substrate, such as applying the
biological sample, drying the sample on the substrate, storage, extraction and elution of the
proteins or peptides from the substrate may be performed under aseptic conditions.
[0049] The samples utilized in this method include, but are not limited to, biological samples
such as blood, serum, tissue, and saliva obtained from any organism, including a human.
[0050] The extracted biomolecules may comprise proteins, peptides, amino acids, enzymes,
antibodies, or combinations thereof. The biomolecules may include naturally occurring
proteins, synthetic proteins, mutated proteins, fusion proteins or chimeric proteins. The proteins
or peptides may be chemically synthesized. In some embodiments, the proteins or peptides may
be naturally synthesized in a cell. In some embodiments, the biomolecules are recombinant
proteins or peptides that may be isolated from cells or tissue section. The biomolecules may
include post translationally modified proteins or peptides. The proteins may comprise enzymes
or catalyst. The proteins, peptides or amino acids may be isolated from various sources, such as
a bacterial source, an animal source or a human source.
Example 1. Preparation of paper substrate
[0051] Reagents: 31-ETF was from GE Healthcare. Paper substrates were impregnated with
melezitose and other reagents by dipping cellulose paper (Whatman 3IETF) in warmed
solutions of the appropriate formulations followed by drying the substrate using line oven
conveyors. The dried substrates were then sealed in Mylar bags with dessicant until further
testing. Four dipping formulations were prepared: (1) a 15% (on a weight-per-volume basis)
melezitose solution, (2) a standard FTA solution also containing 15% melezitose. The standard
FTA components comprise the following (on a weight-per-volume basis): 0.24% EDTA, 1.63%
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1.61% Tris buffer salt, and 0.56%> Uric acid, (3) a 5% (on a
weight-per-volume basis) Ficoll PM400, and (4) a solution contained the following percent sub
components: 6.5% melezitose, 4.2% Ficoll PM 70, and 4.2% Ficoll PM400, referred to
hereinafter as melezitose-Ficoll formulation.
Example 2 : Protein Stability Assay
[0052] Three proteins were selected for initial stability evaluation on cellulose-based
substrates: the cytokine IL-8, the cholesterol protein Apo lipoprotein B (ApoB), and the enzyme
b-galactosidase (b-gal). IL-8 was selected as it is a representative biomarker for respiratory
infection. ApoB was selected as a model labile protein (i.e. known short half-life on dried blood
spots) b -gal was selected as a third model protein for its ability to provide direct quantification
of enzymatic activity.
[0053] For the evaluation of each substrate formulation, 3 mm punches of the substrates were
individually spotted with 3 of buffer or citrate-phosphate-dextrose (CPD)-stabilized human
blood spiked with the protein of interest. The spike concentrations used were: 0.1 mg/mL for
Apo B, 3.3 ng/mL for IL-8 and 10 mg/mL for b-gal. The spotted samples were then dried and
stored in a low humidity environment. For ApoB and IL-8, proteins were eluted off by adding
an elution buffer, and the substrate was incubated under continuous shaking. The eluted protein
was then detected using a commercial ELISA kit. For b-gal, protein stability was determined
using two different methods. In the first method, the protein was eluted from each substrate into
an elution buffer and the activity o f the eluted protein was measured. In the second method, a
punch of each substrate was placed directly in analysis buffer and the enzymatic activity h-
paper' was analyzed. With buffered samples, b-gal activity was assessed by the conversion of
the colorless substrate o-nitrophenyl galactoside to the yellow product o-nitrophenol. With
blood samples, b-gal activity was assessed by the conversion of the substrate with chlorophenol
red galactopyranoside (CPRG) to chlorophenol red. In later studies, other proteins including IL-
1b, IL-6, and TNF-a, were processed and analyzed in a manner similar to IL-8, as described
above.
[0054] The stability of protein in dried blood spot was determined after long-term storage at
room temperature using 31-ETF cellulose dip-coated in an FTA™ solution or in a solution of
FTA™ + 15% melezitose, and the relative stability data from both substrates are shown in Table
1. The data were normalized to the signal of each protein analyte on or eluted off from
unmodified 31-ETF™ cellulose. Table 1 clearly demonstrates that inclusion of melezitose in
either dipping formulation unexpectedly resulted in improved analyte signal relative to either
31-ETF™ cellulose or FTA™ substrate. Although the magnitude of signal improvement is
somewhat protein dependent, the highest signal was achieved for the substrate comprising
FTA™ + 15% melezitose for each analyte in this example. Melezitose-containing substrates
show a minimum of 20-60% improvement in signal for eluted proteins when compared to
proteins eluted from unmodified 31-ETF™ after at least a month of sample storage at ambient
temperatures ranging from ~ 20-22°C (Table 1). Days of storage are denoted in parentheses and
% improvement was calculated as: (signal for test paper -signal for 3IETF)/ (signal for
3IETF)* 100.
Table 1: Change in protein signal relative to unmodified 31-ETF™ ceullulose after prolonged
room temperature storage:
Apo B ELISA +29 (46) -27 (46)
b-gal Enzyme activity +23 (60) -46 (60)
(on paper)
b -gal Enzyme activity +17 (60) -40 (60)
(eluted)
IL-8 ELISA +64 (60) +50 (60)
[0055] The FTA substrate contains denaturants, such as SDS, which results in negative
values for % change in protein signal relative to 31-ETF™ for some analytes, as shown in Table
1. Unexpectedly, impregnating trisaccharides, such as melezitose, into the substrate results in
improved detection signal (net positive values) in the presence of SDS during room temperature
sample storage, thereby demonstrating enhanced protein stability relative to FTA™ without
melezitose.
Example 3 : Protein stability at 30°C
[0056] A list of formulations was selected for determining protein stability after long-term
(90-day) sample storage. In this example, human blood samples containing analyte of interest
were applied to each substrate, and stored for 90 days at 30°C under low humidity conditions,
and then protein stability was determined as described in Example 2. All substrates were
prepared as described above in Example 1. Punches of the substrate formulations were
individually dosed with IL- I b (6 pg^L), IL-8 (7.5 ng/niL), TNF-a (8pg^L), or b -gal (10
mg/mL) in blood and dried at room temperature as described above. Dried blood spots from the
selected substrates were compared with unmodified 31-ETF cellulose after long-term storage
(days of storage in parentheses) at 30°C.
[0057] Based on ELISA or enzymatic activity data, the stabilizing effects of melezitosecontaining
substrates varied with the types of protein analytes tested, however, all the analytes
showed improved signal on substrates containing melezitose relative to 31-ETF cellulose (Table
2). For example, after 90 days of storage, the eluted IL- I b signal was 24% greater for the
substrate containing 15% melezitose and 52% greater for the substrate containing melezitose-
Ficoll formulation than the corresponding signal from the unmodified 31-ETF. The net
improvement in signal for melezitose-containing substrate relative to 31-ETF cellulose after
long-term storage at 30°C is shown in Table 2. Though 5% Ficoll PM400 alone provided a
stabilizing effect for some proteins such as, IL- I b, IL-8, TNF-a, and b -gal as investigated
herein, the substrates with melezitose-Ficoll formulation which comprises melezitose in
combination with Ficoll (or similar compositions as of Ficoll) showed superior stabilizing
effects, as shown in Table 2. In Table 2, the days of storage for all dried blood spot samples are
shown in parentheses and % improvement calculated as: (test paper -31ETF)/(31ETF)*100.
Table 2 : Improvement in signal for melezitose-containing substrate relative to 31-ETF cellulose
after long-term storage at 30°C
Example 4 : Elution efficiency of b-gal from dried samples
[0058] ELISA signal for cytokine targets (IL-1 b, IL-8, and TNF-a) and ApoB provided a
useful measure of the relative stabilizing effects of different cellulose substrates. When the
analyte signal is suppressed, it is difficult to determine whether the suppressed signal results
from complete elution coupled with a substantial protein denaturation or incomplete elution of
substantially active, non-denatured proteins. Since b-gal signal is necessarily dependent on the
active protein, this particular analyte provided an opportunity to measure the actual elution
efficiency of active, non-denatured protein by comparing the "on-paper" signal with the eluted
signal.
[0059] b -gal spiked blood samples were prepared as above and the stability of proteins was
determined for long-term storage in a manner identical to Example 3. The samples were thus
spotted onto 3 mm substrate punches, dried, and stored at 30°C under low humidity condition.
The samples were stored for 14-90 days, and approximately 50% elution improvement was
consistently observed across this storage interval, as shown in FIG. 1. Each data point of FIG. 1
represents the ratio of eluted-to-total ("on-paper") signal of active protein as determined by a
colorimetric enzymatic activity assay. Elution conditions were achieved by placing a 3 mm
dried blood spot sample into a microcentrifuge tube with 100 mL buffer (PBS/0.05% Tween-20)
and mixed thoroughly (800 rpm, lh) before determining the elution efficiency. FIG 1 shows the
enhanced elution efficiency of active, non-denatured b -gal when recovered from a substrate
with 15% melezitose relative to unmodified 31-ETF cellulose when measured in this manner.
[0060] While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described
herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to
be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes
as fall within the scope of the invention.
Claims:
1. A solid substrate for extraction, stabilization and elution of biomolecules, comprising
a melezitose under a substantially dry state.
2. The substrate of claim 1, wherein a concentration of melezitose is in range a of 10 to
30%.
3. The substrate of claim 1 or 2, wherein the concentration of melezitose is 15%.
4. The substrate of claim 1, 2 or 3, further comprising one or more lysis reagents,
biomolecule stabilizing reagents or combinations thereof, impregnated therein under a
substantially dry state.
5. The substrate of claim 4, wherein the lysis reagents comprise detergents, chaotropes,
denaturants or combinations thereof, selected from thiocyanate salts, anionic detergents,
nonionic detergents, cationic detergents, urea, or combinations thereof, preferably
guanidinium thiocyanate, sodium thiocyanate, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or
combinations thereof.
6. The substrate of one or more of claims 1-5, further comprising a reducing agent, a
buffer, an anti-oxidant, a chelating agent or combinations thereof, wherein the reducing
agent is selected from dithiothreitol (DTT), 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME), tris(2-
carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) or combinations thereof, and the buffer is selected from
2-Amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-l,3-diol (Tris), 2-(N -morpholino) ethanesulfonic
acid (MES), 3-(N -morpholino) propanesulfonics acid (MOPS), citrate buffers, 4-(2-
hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), phosphate buffers or
combinations thereof; and wherein the chelating agent is selected from
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid
(EGTA), or combinations thereof.
7. The substrate of one or more of the above claims, further comprising a
polysaccharide, selected from dextran, ficoll, chitosan, amylopectin, alginate,
carboxymethyl cellulose, or combinations thereof.
8. The substrate of claim one or more of the above claims, wherein the substrate is
selected from a nitrocellulose membrane, a cellulose membrane, a cellulose acetate
membrane, a regenerated cellulose membrane, a nitrocellulose mixed ester membranes, a
polyethersulfone membrane, a nylon membrane, a polyolefm membrane, a polyester
membrane, a polycarbonate membrane, a polypropylene membrane, a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane, a polyethylene membrane, a polystyrene membrane, a
polyurethane membrane, a polyphenylene oxide membrane, a poly(tetrafluoroethyleneco-
hexafluoropropylene membrane, glass fiber or combinations thereof.
9. The substrate of one or more of the above claims which is configured to provide
improved stability and elution for biomolecules at ambient temperatures.
10. The substrate of one or more of the above claims which is configured to provide
improved stability of biomolecules during storage of at least one month to three months
at ambient temperature between 20 to 22°C.
11. The substrate of one or more of the above claims, wherein the biomolecules comprise
proteins, peptides, amino acids, enzymes, catalysts or combinations thereof.
12. A solid substrate for collection, stabilization and elution of biomolecules, comprising:
a trisaccharide under a substantially dry state selected from melezitose, raffinose,
maltotriulose, isomaltotriose, nigerotriose, maltotriose, ketose or combinations thereof.
13. A method for extracting, stabilizing and eluting biomolecules from a biological
sample disposed on a solid substrate, comprising:
contacting the biological sample to the substrate, wherein the substrate comprises
melezitose impregnated therein under a substantially dry state;
drying the biological sample to a substantially dry state; and
eluting the biomolecules from the biological sample dried on the substrate by
rehydrating the substrate in an elution buffer.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the substrate is configured to provide 70 to 90%
recovery of the biomolecules from the substrate.
15. The method of claim 13 or 14„ wherein the substrate is configured to elute
biomolecules in an intact form.
16. The method of claim 13, 14 or 15, wherein the substrate comprises cellulose.
17. The method of one or more of claims 13-16, wherein the melezitose is present in a
concentration in a range of 10 to 30%, preferably in a concentration of 15%.
18. The method of one or more of claims 13-17, wherein the substrate further comprises
one or more lysis reagents, nucleic acid denaturing reagents and combinations thereof,
wherein the lysis reagent is selected from thiocyanate salts, detergents, urea or
combinations thereof, preferably lysis reagent is selected from guanidinium thiocyanate,
sodium thiocyanate, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), arginine, urea or combinations
thereof.
19. The method of one or more of claims 13-18, wherein the substrate further comprises a
polysaccharide selected from dextran, ficoll, chitosan, amylopectin, alginate,
carboxymethyl cellulose or combinations thereof, preferably 1 to 10% ficoll.
20. The method of one or more of claims 13-19, wherein the substrate further comprises
reducing agents, buffers, anti-oxidants, chelating agents or combinations thereof
impregnated therein, wherein the reducing agent is selected from dithiothreitol (DTT), 2-
mercaptoethanol (2-ME), tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) or combinations
thereof, wherein the buffer is selected from 2-Amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-l,3-diol
(Tris), 2-(N -morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), 3-(N -morpholino) propanesulfonic
acid (MOPS), citrate buffers, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-l-piperazineethanesulfonic acid
(HEPES), phosphate buffers or combinations thereof, and wherein the chelating agent is
selected from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, ethylene glycol
tetraacetic acid (EGTA), or combinations thereof.
| Section | Controller | Decision Date |
|---|---|---|
| # | Name | Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-08-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-08-01 |
| 1 | Priority Document [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 2 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [17-09-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-09-17 |
| 2 | Power of Attorney [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 3 | Form 5 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 3 | 201617033132-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-05-02-2021).pdf | 2021-10-17 |
| 4 | Form 3 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 4 | 201617033132-IntimationOfGrant18-03-2021.pdf | 2021-03-18 |
| 5 | Form 1 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 5 | 201617033132-PatentCertificate18-03-2021.pdf | 2021-03-18 |
| 6 | Drawing [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 6 | 201617033132-Written submissions and relevant documents [09-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-09 |
| 7 | Description(Complete) [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 7 | 201617033132-Correspondence to notify the Controller [04-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-04 |
| 8 | 201617033132.pdf | 2016-10-02 |
| 8 | 201617033132-FORM-26 [04-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-04 |
| 9 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [20-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-20 |
| 9 | abstract.jpg | 2016-10-14 |
| 10 | 201617033132-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 10 | Form 3 [20-05-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-05-20 |
| 11 | 201617033132-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 11 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 12 | 201617033132-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 12 | 201617033132-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 13 | 201617033132-AMENDED DOCUMENTS [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 13 | 201617033132-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 14 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [27-09-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-09-27 |
| 14 | 201617033132-PA [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 15 | 201617033132-FORM 18 [26-03-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-03-26 |
| 15 | 201617033132-PA [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 16 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [10-06-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-06-10 |
| 16 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [19-04-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-04-19 |
| 17 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [20-12-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-12-20 |
| 17 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [19-04-2018(online)]-1.pdf | 2018-04-19 |
| 18 | 201617033132-CLAIMS [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 18 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [23-11-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-11-23 |
| 19 | 201617033132-DRAWING [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 19 | 201617033132-FER.pdf | 2019-06-06 |
| 20 | 201617033132-FER_SER_REPLY [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 20 | 201617033132-Information under section 8(2) (MANDATORY) [01-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-01 |
| 21 | 201617033132-OTHERS [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 21 | 201617033132-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 22 | 201617033132-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [30-10-2019(online)]-1.pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 23 | 201617033132-OTHERS [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 23 | 201617033132-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 24 | 201617033132-Information under section 8(2) (MANDATORY) [01-08-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-08-01 |
| 24 | 201617033132-FER_SER_REPLY [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 25 | 201617033132-FER.pdf | 2019-06-06 |
| 25 | 201617033132-DRAWING [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 26 | 201617033132-CLAIMS [30-10-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-10-30 |
| 26 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [23-11-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-11-23 |
| 27 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [19-04-2018(online)]-1.pdf | 2018-04-19 |
| 27 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [20-12-2019(online)].pdf | 2019-12-20 |
| 28 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [10-06-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-06-10 |
| 28 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [19-04-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-04-19 |
| 29 | 201617033132-FORM 18 [26-03-2018(online)].pdf | 2018-03-26 |
| 29 | 201617033132-PA [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 30 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [27-09-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-09-27 |
| 30 | 201617033132-PA [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 31 | 201617033132-AMENDED DOCUMENTS [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 31 | 201617033132-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 32 | 201617033132-ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 32 | 201617033132-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 33 | 201617033132-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [16-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 33 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [22-08-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-08-22 |
| 34 | 201617033132-8(i)-Substitution-Change Of Applicant - Form 6 [16-10-2020(online)]-1.pdf | 2020-10-16 |
| 34 | Form 3 [20-05-2017(online)].pdf | 2017-05-20 |
| 35 | 201617033132-FORM 3 [20-10-2020(online)].pdf | 2020-10-20 |
| 35 | abstract.jpg | 2016-10-14 |
| 36 | 201617033132.pdf | 2016-10-02 |
| 36 | 201617033132-FORM-26 [04-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-04 |
| 37 | Description(Complete) [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 37 | 201617033132-Correspondence to notify the Controller [04-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-04 |
| 38 | Drawing [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 38 | 201617033132-Written submissions and relevant documents [09-02-2021(online)].pdf | 2021-02-09 |
| 39 | Form 1 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 39 | 201617033132-PatentCertificate18-03-2021.pdf | 2021-03-18 |
| 40 | Form 3 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 40 | 201617033132-IntimationOfGrant18-03-2021.pdf | 2021-03-18 |
| 41 | Form 5 [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 41 | 201617033132-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-05-02-2021).pdf | 2021-10-17 |
| 42 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [17-09-2022(online)].pdf | 2022-09-17 |
| 42 | Power of Attorney [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 43 | 201617033132-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-08-2023(online)].pdf | 2023-08-01 |
| 43 | Priority Document [28-09-2016(online)].pdf | 2016-09-28 |
| 1 | 2019-05-3012-35-58_30-05-2019.pdf |