Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Synergistic Pesticidal Composition Comprising Diafenthiuron

Abstract: The present invention discloses a synergistic pesticidal composition, comprising Diafenthiuron and Emamectin or its salt, wherein the mass ratio between Diafenthiuron and Emamectin or its salt ranges from 1:16 - 1:50.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
13 May 2015
Publication Number
48/2016
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
AGROCHEMICALS
Status
Email
vishal@inttladvocare.com
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2023-03-29
Renewal Date

Applicants

WILLOWOOD CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED
409, Fourth Floor, Salcon Aurum, District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi -110 025, India

Inventors

1. PARIKSHIT MUNDHRA
409, Fourth Floor, Salcon Aurum, District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi -110 025, India
2. JITENDRA MOHAN
409, Fourth Floor, Salcon Aurum, District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi -110 025, India

Specification

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a pesticidal composition and more particularly to
a synergistic pesticidal composition comprising Diafenthiuron, and Emamectin or
its salts.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is observed very often, that prolonged usage of pesticides leads to development
of resistance by pests which make the pesticide ineffective. This results in
application of pesticide compositions in higher doses which is detrimental to the
environment.
A significant obstacle faced by the researchers in this technical field is regarding
pesticide activity. For protection of crops it is vital that biological activity of the
pesticides should be improved and also that the activity should be persistent over a
period of time.
Hence, there is a need to develop a composition which addresses the problem of
resistance and soil toxicity and also is used at reduced dosages, controls
environmental damage, offers broader crop protection spectrum, improved and
healthy foliage, rainfastedness, improved crop yield, saves labour and controls
various insects and pests, improves plant growth and is yet cost-effective to the
end user.
Prior art patent application EP0736252 discloses the combinations of
diafenthiuron with other insecticides. The patent application EP 0736252 A2
discloses the list of several insecticides that can be used in combination with
Diafenthiuron. However it does not teach or provide the particular combination of
Diafenthiuron and Emamectin or its salts thereof nor does it discloses the
concentration ranges and the ratios of Diafenthiuron and Emamectin which show
synergistic effect and hence preclude high loading of harmful pesticides.
A pesticidal composition must satisfy a range of requirements to be viable on the
market. One such requirement of the pesticidal composition is the ability to be
selective in biological action and have low toxicity and a high margin of safety to
humans, crops, economic animals, aquatic organisms and birds. Another
1011/PAT APPLN/13
3
requirement is the desire that the composition should be environmental-friendly in
that there should be demonstrably low impacts on the environment. Further, there
should be none or little insect resistance to such compounds or combinations.
In a view of afore mentioned there is a need for preparing synergistic pesticidal
compositions comprising effective amounts of Emamectin and Diafenthiuron
which provide improved efficacies at lower concentration compared to that
observed with the individual components.
Certain mixtures of active ingredients are proposed in the literature for controlling
pests. However, the biological properties of these mixtures of known compounds
are not entirely satisfactory in the field of pest control, which is why there is a
demand for providing further mixtures having synergistic pesticidal properties, in
particular for controlling insects and representatives of the order Acarina. This
object is achieved according to the present invention by providing the present
composition.
The invention relates to a pesticidal composition which comprises a pesticidallysynergistically
active combination, in variable proportions, of the pesticidally
active compound Diafenthiuron (CAS-Number: 80060-09-9), in free form or in
the form of an agro chemically acceptable salt.
Diafenthiuron, mainly protects crops, fruits, vegetables, cotton, tea and
ornamental plants from aphids, whiteflies, leafhoppers, has high control effect on
the already resistant diamondback moth and grey armyworm and has a specific
control effect on spider mite. It has excellent contact and stomach action, and
good penetration ability. It is a pro-insecticide, which has to be converted to its
active from, before it can act on an insect. The active compound then acts on the
energy-producing enzymes in the mitochondria. This results in immediate
paralysis of the pest after intake or contact with the product. Notably,
Diafenthiuron is also safe for predators, earthworms and birds.
Emamectin (CAS-Number: 155569-91-8) is a mixture of mixture of ≥ 90%
(10E,14E,16E)-(1R,4S,5′S,6S,6′R,8R,12S,13S,20R,21R,24S)-6′-[(S)-sec-butyl]-
21,24-dihydroxy-5′,11,13,22-tetramethyl-2-oxo-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo
pentacosa-10,14,16,22-tetraene)-6-spiro-2′-(5′,6′-dihydro-2′H-pyran)-12-yl 2,6-
1011/PAT APPLN/13
4
dideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-O-(2,4,6-trideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-methylamino-α-L-lyxohexapyranosyl)-
α-L-arabino-hexapyranoside benzoate and ≤ 10% (10E,14E,16E)-
(1R,4S,5′S,6S,6′R,8R,12S,13S,20R,21R,24S)-21,24-dihydroxy-6′-isopropyl-
5′,11,13,22-tetramethyl-2-oxo-(3,7,19-trioxatetracyclo pentacosa-10,14,16,22-
tetraene)-6-spiro-2′-(5′,6′-dihydro-2′H-pyran)-12-yl 2,6-dideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-O-
(2,4,6-trideoxy-3-O-methyl-4-methylamino-α-L-lyxo-hexapyranosyl)-α-Larabino-
hexapyranoside benzoate and is described as MK-244 in Journal of
Organic Chemistry, Vol. 59 (1994), 7704- 7708. Salts of Emamectin that are
especially valuable agrochemically are described in US-P-5,288,710. Emamectin
works as a chloride channel activator by binding gamma aminobutyric
acid (GABA) receptor and glutamate-gated chloride channels disrupting nerve
signals within arthropods. The compound stimulates the release of GABA from
the synapses between nerve cells and while additionally increasing GABA’s
affinity for its receptor on the post-junction membrane of muscle cells in insects
and arthropods. The stronger binding of GABA increases the cells permeability to
chloride ions within the cell due to the hypotonic concentration
gradient. Neurotransmission is thereby reduced by subsequent hyperpolarisation
and the elimination of signal transduction.
Diafenthiuron is available in form of 50% wettable powder, whereas Emamectin
(Benzoate) is generally formulated as 5% soluble granules and 1.9% emulsifiable
concentrate. Hitherto, there have been no studies to determine the mostefficacious
and synergistic ratios of these two pesticides to achieve efficacious
insect control. Hence there is a need in the art for a synergistic pesticidal
composition comprising these pesticides.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a synergistic pesticidal composition for wide
spectrum control of insect pests, delaying the emergence of the resistant strains of
the insect-pests, minimizing the risk of development of resistance, and achieving
effective and economical control of undesired insect-pests.
1011/PAT APPLN/13
5
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, there is provided a
synergistic pesticidal composition, comprising Diafenthiuron and Emamectin or
its salt; wherein the mass ratio between Diafenthiuron, and Emamectin or its salts
ranges from 1:16 to 1:50.
In accordance with yet another embodiment of the invention, Diafenthiuron is
present in an amount of 30.00% and Emamectin or its salt such as Emamectin
benzoate is present in an amount in the range from 0.60 to 1.90%.
In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention, the synergistic
pesticidal composition of the present invention is in the form of a suspension
concentrate (SC) or Water dispersible granules (WG or WDG).
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the synergistic pesticidal
composition further comprises excipients selected from the group consisting of
anti-freezing agent, dispersing cum wetting agent, defoamer, biocide, thickener,
water and combinations thereof, and the composition is in the from of a
suspension concentrate (SC).
In accordance with still another embodiment of the invention, the anti-freezing
agent is present in an amount in the range from 1.00-8.00%, the dispersing cum
wetting agent is present in an amount in the range from 2.00-10.00%, the
defoamer is present in an amount in the range from 0.01-0.50%, the biocide is
present in an amount in the range from 0.01-0.50% and the thickener is present in
an amount in the range from 0.10-0.50%.
In accordance with still yet another embodiment of the invention, said
composition is non-phytotoxic.
The synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention is found to be
useful in protecting a wide range of crops like cotton, vegetables, pulses, spices
etc. against various insect pests like sucking pests, borers etc. The composition
achieves improved biological performance in single application by enhancing
overall control of insect-pests over a shorter period of time. Additional benefits of
using the pesticidal composition of the present invention includes reduced risk of
1011/PAT APPLN/13
6
occupational exposure and hazards, lower cost of application, better cost-benefit
ratio to the end users, reduced fuel cost and labor cost, savings in applicator’s time
and reduced wear of personal protection equipment and losses caused by
mechanical damage to the crops and soil.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Figure 1. is a flowchart for preparing a synergistic pesticidal composition in the
form of a suspension concentrate (SC).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
Discussed below are some representative embodiments of the present invention.
The invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details and
representative methods. The illustrative examples are described in this section in
connection with the embodiments and methods provided. The invention according
to its various aspects is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the
appended claims read in view of this specification and appropriate equivalents.
It is to be noted that, as used in the specification and the appended claims, the
singular forms "a", "an" and "the" include plural referents unless the context
clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a composition
containing “a compound” includes a mixture of two or more compounds. It should
also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including
“and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w/w” or “%” means the
percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total solution or composition
unless otherwise specified.
The term "agrochemically effective amount" is that quantity of active agent,
applied in any amount which will provide the required control of insect pests and
diseases. The particular amount is dependent upon many factors including, for
example, the crop, pest and disease sought to be controlled and environmental
conditions. The selection of the proper quantity of active agent to be applied,
however, is within the expertise of one skilled in the art. Further, the term “active
1011/PAT APPLN/13
7
ingredient” (A.I.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the
composition responsible for control of insect pests.
Compositions comprising a single insecticidally active component suffer from
numerous drawbacks such as development of resistant insect species, requirement
of high amount and concentration of the active ingredient, environmental damage,
seepage of the active component into ground water, phyto-toxicity and harmful
effects on the health of animals and humans.
Accordingly, the inventors of the present invention have developed a synergistic
pesticidal composition comprising Diafenthiuron; and Emamectin or its salt such
as Emamectin benzoate, wherein the mass ratio between Diafenthiuron, and
Emamectin or its salts ranges from 1:16 to 1:50. The pesticidal composition
contains about 30.00% of Diafenthiuron, and Emamectin, or its salt such as
Emamectin benzoate, is present in an amount in the range from 0.60 to 1.90%.
The synergistic pesticidal composition, further comprises excipients selected from
the group consisting of anti-freezing agent, dispersing cum wetting agent,
defoamer, biocide, thickener, water and combinations thereof, and the
composition is in the form of a suspension concentrate (SC). The term
“suspension concentrate” used herein refers to a suspension of the active pesticide
and excipients in a small quantity of liquid, usually water. A composition in the
form of a suspension concentrate is user friendly and affords a reduced risk of
occupational exposure.
An anti-freezing agent is generally added to pesticidal compositions, to prevent
the aqueous compositions from freezing. Suitable anti-freezing agents useful
herein, but not limited to, include propylene glycol, Diethylene glycol (DEG),
Mono ethylene glycol (MEG) and combinations thereof. Preferably, the antifreezing
agent is present in an amount in the range from 1.00-8.00%.
A dispersing cum wetting agent is another important component of a suspension
concentrates as it facilitates the formation of a suspension of a water insoluble
substrate in water. Non-limiting examples of dispersing cum wetting agent that
can be used in the present invention include non-ionic surfactants and amine salt
of phosphate tristyryl phenol ethylated, acrylic copolymer, ethoxylated
1011/PAT APPLN/13
8
polyarylphenol phosphate ester, each of which can be used individually or in
combination, in an amount in the range from 2.00-10.00%.
A defoamer, also called as anti-foam, is generally added to a pesticidal
composition as foam formation prevents the efficient filling of a container.
Preferably, the defoamer is dimethyl polysiloxane emulsion and present in an
amount in the range from 0.01-0.50%.
The synergistic pesticidal composition may contain a biocide selected from the
group consisting of Proxel GXL, formaldehyde and combinations thereof, and
present in an amount in the range from 0.01-0.50%. Proxel GXL is a broad
spectrum biocide for the preservation of industrial water-based products, such as
the composition of the present invention, against spoilage from bacteria, yeasts
and fungi.
It is necessary to add a thickener to a pesticidal composition to reduce the
tendency of the pesticide composition to disperse when sprayed, and decrease the
likelihood of it being rinsed off of the crops. Preferably, the synergistic pesticidal
composition comprises xanthan gum as thickener in an amount in the range from
0.10-0.50%.
It has been surprisingly found that the synergistic pesticidal composition of
present invention provides a wide spectrum control of insect pests, delaying the
emergence of the resistant strains of the insect-pests, and achieving effective and
economical control of undesired insect-pests.
The embodiments of the present invention are more particularly described in the
following examples that are intended as illustrations only, since numerous
modifications and variations within the scope of the present invention will be
apparent to those of skill in the art. Unless otherwise noted, all parts, percentages
and ratios reported in the following examples are on a weight basis and all
reagents used in the examples were obtained or are available from the chemical
suppliers.
1011/PAT APPLN/13
9
Examples 1-3
The unit of each value below is “% w/w” i. e. the percentage by weight, relative to
the weight of the total solution or composition unless otherwise specified. The
compositions contemplated by each of the Examples 1-3 that are tabulated in
Table 1 are formulated as a Suspension Concentrate (SC) formulation.
Table 1: Synergistic Pesticidal compositions
Component Function Examples
1 2 3
Diafenthiuron **A.I 30.00 30.00 30.00
Emamectin benzoate **A.I 0.60 1.10 1.90
Propylene glycol Anti-freeze
Agent
1.00 5.00 8.00
Mixture of nonionic surfactants
& amine salt of phosphate tristyryl
phenol ethylated
Dispersing cum
Wetting Agent
2.00 5.00 10.00
Dimethyl Polysiloxane emulsion Deformer 0.10 0.20 0.50
Proxel GXL Biocide 0.01 0.20 0.50
Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.10 0.30 0.50
Demineralized Water Solvent *q.s. *q.s. *q.s.
*q.s. = quantity sufficient
**A.I = Active ingredient
The aforementioned synergistic pesticidal compositions can be formulated as
Suspension Concentrate (SC) by the process described below.
1011/PAT APPLN/13
10
Process for preparing synergistic pesticide composition in the form of
Suspension Concentrate (SC)
The synergistic insecticidal compositions of Examples 1-3 are prepared by the
process depicted in Figure 1. All the raw materials were verified for conformance
to the laid down individual specifications. The raw materials required for
Examples 1, 2, and 3 are illustrated in table 2 under the column headings 1, 2, and
3 respectively. Entries for Emamectin Benzoate and Diafenthiuron in table 2 differ
from those in table 1 as entries in table 1 are for 100% pure compounds, whereas
those in table 2 are for technical ones, i.e. the ones containing a certain percentage
of impurities.
The amounts of active ingredients presented in table 2 may be greater than the
values calculated taking into account the percentage purity of the active
ingredients, to compensate for losses of said ingredients during the manufacturing
process. It was observed that following said procedure on industrial scale the final
yield of A.I. will be similar or same as to standardized values.
The required quantities of raw materials as illustrated in Table 2 below, were
weighed, and transferred through the auto-batching system. The dispersing cum
wetting agent is first diluted in demineralized (D.M.) water and solubilized by
high shear mixing, and then added along with required quantities of anti-freezing
agent, Emamectin benzoate technical, deformer and Diafenthiuron technical, into
a premixing vessel, to make a homogeneous mass. Thereafter, the homogenous
mass was ground to a mean particle size of 3-5 microns in a bead mil and mixed
with 2% aqueous solution of xanthan gum under low stirring. Further, the quality
of in-process sample was checked for conformance to the laid out specifications.
Finally, the quality approved in-process sample was transferred to the holding
tank after passing through sparkler filter pump for packing as per the
requirements.
1011/PAT APPLN/13
11
Table 2: Quantities of the **TGAI and raw materials charged
Component Function Examples Quantities
of materials charged
(kg)
1 2 3
Diafenthiuron **TGAI 31.00 31.00 31.00
Emamectin benzoate **TGAI 0.64 1.16 2.05
Propylene glycol Anti-freeze
Agent
5.00 5.00 5.00
Mixture of nonionic surfactants
& amine salt of phosphate tristyryl
phenol ethylated
Dispersing cum
Wetting Agent
5.00 5.00 5.00
Dimethyl Polysiloxane emulsion Deformer 0.20 0.20 0.20
Proxel GXL Biocide 0.20 0.20 0.20
Xanthan Gum Thickener 0.30 0.30 0.30
Demineralized Water Solvent 57.66 57.14 56.25
**TGAI = Technical Grade Active ingredient
Evaluation of bio-efficacy of the synergistic pesticidal composition against
insects in brinjal
Field trials were performed to evaluate the biological efficacy of the synergistic
insecticidal composition of present invention against the common and hazardous
sucking pests. This evaluation was performed by comparing the claimed
synergistic pesticidal composition in the present invention against the marketed
reference products, i.e., Diafenthiuron (Main Star 50% WP) and Emamectin
Benzoate (Missile 5% WG & Billo 1.9% EC).
1011/PAT APPLN/13
12
15 plants, in each plot/replication treated with the above compositions (5 leaves in
each plant) were randomly tagged, and total number of insects/15 plant/plot were
recorded before the spray and 1 DAT (days after treatment), 3 DAT, 7 DAT and
10 DAT and mean control is calculated, and percent damaged fruits/shoots were
analyzed at harvest for borers (fruit and shoot borer incidence). Based on various
doses, weighed quantity of test products were dissolved in 10 L of water/treatment
and sprayed uniformly.
Details of the experiment
Target pests: sucking pests (aphids, jassids, whitefly and thrips) and borers (fruit
& shoot borer).
Crop: Brinjal
Variety: Pusa Hybrid 5
Water volume/acre: 200 liters
Spray Equipment: Power operated knapsack sprayers fitted with cone nozzle
Observation: Means of five leaves /15 plants/ plot
The treatment details are tabulated in Table 3 below.
Table 3: Treatment details for evaluation of bio-efficacy of novel synergistic
pesticidal composition against insect pests in brinjal
Particulars Treatment Dose/Acre
T1 Diafenthiuron 30% and Emamectin benzoate
0.6% SC
400 mL
T2 Diafenthiuron 30% and Emamectin benzoate
1.1% SC
400 mL
T3 Emamectin benzoate 5% SG 80 g
T4 Diafenthiuron 30% and Emamectin benzoate 400 mL
1011/PAT APPLN/13
13
1.9% SC
T5 Diafenthiuron 50% WP 240 g
T6 Emamectin benzoate 1.9% EC 212 mL
T7 Control Water spray
The bio-efficacy of different spray schedule on brinjal crop and the treatment wise
yield data of brinjal fruits are summarized in the Table 4 and Table 5 below.
Table 4: The bio-efficacy of pesticidal compositions on Brinjal crop
Treatment
* Sucking pest/leaf **Percent damaged of Borer
PT
Mean(average of four
observation)
% reduction over control
% damaged fruits
% reduction over control
% damaged shoots
% reduction over control
T1 89.36
13.40
(3.73)
88.76
11.23
(19.58)
68.36
18.36
(25.37)
58.61
T2 92.15
10.14
(3.26)
91.50
9.68
(18.13)
72.72
15.48
(23.17)
65.10
T3 85.65
28.26
(5.36)
76.30
12.36
(20.58)
65.17
20.03
(26.59)
54.85
T4 88.6
7.97
(2.91)
93.32
9.23
(17.69)
73.99
13.96
(21.94)
68.53
1011/PAT APPLN/13
14
T5 92.45
17.57
(4.25)
85.26
14.58
(22.45)
58.92
23.65
(29.10)
46.69
T6 86.99
30.45
(5.56)
74.46
12.86
(21.01)
63.76
18.47
(25.45)
58.36
T7 91.45
119.23
(10.94)
-
35.49
(36.57)
-
44.36
(41.76)
-
S.Em± - 0.05 - 0.28 - 0.26 -
CD at
5%
NS 0.14 - 0.87 - 0.79 -
* Value in parenthesis are square root transformed value
** Value in parenthesis are square root transformed value
PT: Pre-treatment values *SEm ±: Standard Errors of Means; CD 5%:
Critical Difference
Table 5: Treatment Wise Yield Data of Brinjal fruits
Treatment Yield (t/ha)
% increase over
control
T1 29.28 33.82
T2 (Diafenthiuron 30% and
Emamectin benzoate 1.1% SC)
31.14 42.32
T3 27.86 27.33
T4 31.18 42.50
T5 24.27 10.92
1011/PAT APPLN/13
15
T6 26.30 20.20
T7 21.88 -
SEm ± 0.57 -
CD 5% 1.77 -
*SEm ±: Standard Errors of Means; CD 5%: Critical Difference
The aforementioned trial results indicate that a composition in the form of a
Suspension Concentrate (T4) comprising Diafenthiuron (30%) and Emamectin
Benzoate (1.9%) is most effective against all the target insects as specified in the
table above. Additionally, this composition results in lower shoot & fruit damage,
better crop condition i.e. fresh green leaves and better yield. Similar effects were
found in the case of a composition in the form of a suspension concentrate (T1)
comprising Diafenthiuron (30%) and Emamectin Benzoate (0.6%) and the one
(T2) comprising Diafenthiuron (30%) and Emamectin Benzoate (1.1%).
Commercially available reference products failed to show any significant effect.
The phytotoxic effect of different treatment schedules were also observed in ten
randomly selected plants from each plot on 0-10 scale (Table 6) for yellowing,
stunting, necrosis, epinasty hyponasty etc. Observations were recorded on 1, 3, 7,
and 14 days after application and presented in Table 7.
Table 6: Phytotoxicity visual scoring 0-10
Description of
crop
Rating Remarks
Description of
crop
Rating Remarks
No injury,
normal
0 Immune Severe injury,
no recovery
possible
6 Moderately
tolerant
Slight injury /
discoloration
1 Resistant Sever injury,
stand loss
7 Susceptible
Some stand 2 Moderately Almost 8 Susceptible
1011/PAT APPLN/13
16
crop, stunning /
discoloration
destroyed, a few
plants surviving
Injury more
pronounced but
not persistent
3 Tolerant Very few plants
alive
9 Highly
susceptible
Moderate
injury, recovery
possible
4 Tolerant Complete
destruction
10 Highly
susceptible
Injury more
persistent,
recovery more
doubtful
5 Moderately
tolerant
Table 7: Phytotoxicity of pesticidal compositions on Brinjal plant
Treatments
Days after spraying
1 day 3 days 7 days 14 days
R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3 R1 R2 R3
T1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
T7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R: Replication
1011/PAT APPLN/13
17
It is evident from the phyto-toxicity studies that the synergistic pesticidal
composition of the present invention shows no phyto-toxicities even 14 DAT.
From the foregoing it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations
can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel
concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitations with
respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred. It
should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been
deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within
the scope of the following claims.

We Claim:
1. A synergistic pesticidal composition, comprising Diafenthiuron and
Emamectin or its salt.
2. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
mass ratio between Diafenthiuron, and Emamectin or its salts ranges from
1:16 to 1:50.
3. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claims 1 and 2,
wherein Diafenthiuron is present in an amount of 30.00% and Emamectin
or its salt is present in an amount in the range from 0.60 to 1.90%.
4. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 1 to 3, further
comprising excipients, wherein the composition is in the form of a
Suspension concentrate (SC) or Water dispersible granules (WDG or WG).
5. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claims 1 to 4,
wherein the excipients are selected from the group consisting of antifreezing
agent, dispersing cum wetting agent, defoamer, biocide, thickener,
water and combinations thereof, and the composition is in the form of a
suspension concentrate (SC).
6. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
anti-freezing agent is selected from the group consisting of propylene
glycol, di-ethylene glycol (DEG), ,mono-ethylene glycol (MEG) and
combinations thereof, and present in an amount in the range from 1.00-
8.00%.
7. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
dispersing cum wetting agent is selected from the group consisting of
mixture of non-ionic surfactants and amine salt of phosphate tristyryl
phenol ethylated, acrylic copolymer, ethoxylated polyarylphenol phosphate
ester and combinations thereof, and present in an amount in the range from
2.00-10.00%.
1011/PAT APPLN/13
19
8. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
defoamer is dimethyl polysiloxane emulsion and present in an amount in
the range from 0.01-0.50%.
9. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
biocide is selected from Proxel GXL or formaldehyde and present in an
amount in the range from 0.01-0.50%.
10. The synergistic pesticidal composition, as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
thickener is Xanthan gum and present in an amount in the range from 0.10-
0.50%.
11. The synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in any of the claims 1 to
10, wherein said composition is non-phytotoxic.

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 1344-DEL-2015-IntimationOfGrant29-03-2023.pdf 2023-03-29
1 PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION.pdf 2015-05-15
2 1344-DEL-2015-PatentCertificate29-03-2023.pdf 2023-03-29
2 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY.pdf 2015-05-15
3 1344-del-2015-GPA-(27-05-2015).pdf 2015-05-27
3 1344-DEL-2015-Annexure [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
4 1344-DEL-2015-Response to office action [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
4 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Others-(27-05-2015).pdf 2015-05-27
5 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
5 1344-del-2015-Form-1-(15-07-2015).pdf 2015-07-15
6 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 138 [01-12-2022(online)]-1.pdf 2022-12-01
6 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Other-(15-07-2015).pdf 2015-07-15
7 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 138 [01-12-2022(online)].pdf 2022-12-01
7 1344-del-2015-Form-5-(05-11-2015).pdf 2015-11-05
8 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-12-2022(online)].pdf 2022-12-01
8 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Others-(05-11-2015).pdf 2015-11-05
9 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [15-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-15
9 Drawing [11-05-2016(online)].pdf 2016-05-11
10 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [14-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-14
10 Description(Complete) [11-05-2016(online)].pdf 2016-05-11
11 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [11-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-11
11 1344-DEL-2015-FER.pdf 2018-09-27
12 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [11-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-11
12 1344-DEL-2015-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
13 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 13 [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
13 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-01
14 1344-DEL-2015-FER_SER_REPLY [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
14 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-16-11-2022).pdf 2022-10-27
15 1344-DEL-2015-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
15 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [27-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-27
16 1344-DEL-2015-CLAIMS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
16 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-28-09-2022).pdf 2022-09-01
17 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [22-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-22
17 1344-DEL-2015-AMMENDED DOCUMENTS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
18 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [22-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-22
18 1344-DEL-2015-PRE GRANT OPPOSITION FORM [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
19 1344-DEL-2015-PRE GRANT OPPOSITION DOCUMENT [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
19 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [20-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-20
20 1344-DEL-2015-OTHERS [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
20 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-24-08-2022).pdf 2022-07-28
21 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 3 [26-09-2019(online)].pdf 2019-09-26
21 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [13-05-2022(online)].pdf 2022-05-13
22 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [27-04-2022(online)].pdf 2022-04-27
22 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
23 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
23 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-28-04-2022).pdf 2022-04-05
24 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [08-02-2022(online)].pdf 2022-02-08
24 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 13 [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
25 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [04-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-04
25 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-09-02-2022).pdf 2022-01-14
26 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [29-12-2021(online)].pdf 2021-12-29
26 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-06-10-2021).pdf 2021-10-17
27 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-12-2021(online)].pdf 2021-12-29
27 1344-del-2015-Represetation u-s 25(1) reg..pdf 2021-10-17
28 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-12-2021(online)].pdf 2021-12-29
28 1344-del-2015-Represetation u-s 25(1) reg..pdf 2021-10-17
29 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [29-12-2021(online)].pdf 2021-12-29
29 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-06-10-2021).pdf 2021-10-17
30 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [04-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-04
30 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-09-02-2022).pdf 2022-01-14
31 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 13 [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
31 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [08-02-2022(online)].pdf 2022-02-08
32 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
32 1344-DEL-2015-US(14)-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-28-04-2022).pdf 2022-04-05
33 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [27-04-2022(online)].pdf 2022-04-27
33 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-01
34 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 3 [26-09-2019(online)].pdf 2019-09-26
34 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [13-05-2022(online)].pdf 2022-05-13
35 1344-DEL-2015-OTHERS [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
35 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-HearingNotice-(HearingDate-24-08-2022).pdf 2022-07-28
36 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [20-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-20
36 1344-DEL-2015-PRE GRANT OPPOSITION DOCUMENT [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
37 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [22-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-22
37 1344-DEL-2015-PRE GRANT OPPOSITION FORM [16-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-16
38 1344-DEL-2015-AMMENDED DOCUMENTS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
38 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [22-08-2022(online)].pdf 2022-08-22
39 1344-DEL-2015-CLAIMS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
39 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-28-09-2022).pdf 2022-09-01
40 1344-DEL-2015-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
40 1344-DEL-2015-REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING UNDER RULE 129A [27-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-27
41 1344-DEL-2015-FER_SER_REPLY [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
41 1344-DEL-2015-PreGrant-ExtendedHearingNotice-(HearingDate-16-11-2022).pdf 2022-10-27
42 1344-DEL-2015-FORM 13 [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
42 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-01
43 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [11-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-11
43 1344-DEL-2015-MARKED COPIES OF AMENDEMENTS [06-02-2019(online)].pdf 2019-02-06
44 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [11-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-11
44 1344-DEL-2015-FER.pdf 2018-09-27
45 1344-DEL-2015-Correspondence to notify the Controller [14-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-14
45 Description(Complete) [11-05-2016(online)].pdf 2016-05-11
46 Drawing [11-05-2016(online)].pdf 2016-05-11
46 1344-DEL-2015-FORM-26 [15-11-2022(online)].pdf 2022-11-15
47 1344-DEL-2015-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [01-12-2022(online)].pdf 2022-12-01
47 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Others-(05-11-2015).pdf 2015-11-05
48 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 138 [01-12-2022(online)].pdf 2022-12-01
48 1344-del-2015-Form-5-(05-11-2015).pdf 2015-11-05
49 1344-DEL-2015-PETITION UNDER RULE 138 [01-12-2022(online)]-1.pdf 2022-12-01
49 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Other-(15-07-2015).pdf 2015-07-15
50 1344-DEL-2015-Written submissions and relevant documents [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
50 1344-del-2015-Form-1-(15-07-2015).pdf 2015-07-15
51 1344-del-2015-Correspondence Others-(27-05-2015).pdf 2015-05-27
51 1344-DEL-2015-Response to office action [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
52 1344-DEL-2015-Annexure [01-01-2023(online)].pdf 2023-01-01
52 1344-del-2015-GPA-(27-05-2015).pdf 2015-05-27
53 1344-DEL-2015-PatentCertificate29-03-2023.pdf 2023-03-29
53 GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY.pdf 2015-05-15
54 1344-DEL-2015-IntimationOfGrant29-03-2023.pdf 2023-03-29
54 PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION.pdf 2015-05-15

Search Strategy

1 searchstrategy_24-09-2018.pdf

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2017 - To 13/05/2018

4th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2018 - To 13/05/2019

5th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2019 - To 13/05/2020

6th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2020 - To 13/05/2021

7th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2021 - To 13/05/2022

8th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2022 - To 13/05/2023

9th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2023 - To 13/05/2024

10th: 13 Apr 2023

From 13/05/2024 - To 13/05/2025

11th: 21 Apr 2025

From 13/05/2025 - To 13/05/2026

12th: 21 Apr 2025

From 13/05/2026 - To 13/05/2027

13th: 21 Apr 2025

From 13/05/2027 - To 13/05/2028

14th: 21 Apr 2025

From 13/05/2028 - To 13/05/2029

15th: 21 Apr 2025

From 13/05/2029 - To 13/05/2030