Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

System And Method For Locating Sparks In Electrostatic Precipitators

Abstract: A system includes an electrostatic precipitator (11), an electromagnetic sensor (16) and a processing device (17) to locate spark locations. The electromagnetic sensor (16) is used at various locations of the electrostatic precipitator (11) to obtain data and process the same for locating sparks in electrostatic precipitators.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
28 October 2009
Publication Number
31/2010
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
ELECTRICAL
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

General Electric Company
1 River Road  Schenectady  NEW YORK 12345 USA.

Inventors

1. RAI Sudhanshu
House No. 400 B Block AECS Layout  Kundalhalli  Bangalore 560037  Karnataka India.
2. JAMMU Vinay Bhaskar
11G Asset Gardenia  Ramgondanahalli White Field  Bangalore 500066 Karnataka India.
3. PRABHU Rahul Srinivas
314  8th Cross  Mahalakshmi Layout  Bangalore 560086  Karnataka India.

Specification

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOCATING SPARKS IN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for
locating sparks in electrostatic precipitators.
[0002] An electrostatic precipitator (ESP) removes particles from a flowing gas
(such as air) using the force of an induced electrostatic charge. ESPs act as filtration devices that minimally impede the flow of gases and can easily remove fine particulate matter such as dust and smoke from the air stream. A typical ESP includes a row of cathodes disposed between large flat metal collection plates. The cathodes and the plates are typically applied with a high voltage of several thousand volts. The gas to be purified of fine particulate matter is flowed through the ESP near the cathodes. The high voltage ionizes the air around the cathodes. The gas stream flows through the spaces between the cathodes and then dust or particles (fine particulate) gets collected on the collection plates.
[0003] The fine particulate collection efficiency within a respective ESP is
dependent on the field intensity that is proportional to the voltage applied between the cathodes. Thus, in order to efficiently collect fine particulate or dust, it is of utmost importance to maintain the applied voltage as high as possible. However, the voltage is limited by the phenomena of sparking that occurs more and more frequently as the electric field strength, temperature of the gas, humidity, or number of fine particulate or dust particles in the gas is increased. The composition of the gas and the resistivity of the fine particulate also have a major affect on the sparking voltage. Each time a spark occurs, the voltage across the ESP falls sharply and then, after the spark is extinguished, recovers to its original value. If the applied voltage is increased, the sparking rate is increased. ESP sparks in the cathodes, thus, result in lower operating voltage and hence
I

reduced performance. Thus, it is useful not only to detect the existence or initiation of the sparks in an ESP but also to determine the location of the sparks.
[0004] Conventional methods of locating the sparks include manual viewing of
sparks through glass, which viewing can be a challenge due to the large amount of dust that is typically present in ESPs. Such a process is time consuming and can only be done offline.
[0005] Thus, there is a need for a method and a system that detects and locates
sparks within an ESP during operation to avoid excessive wear and tear, and improve the overall operability of an ESP.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0006] In accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention a
system for locating sparks in an electrostatic precipitator is disclosed. The system comprises at least one electromagnetic sensor, an electrostatic precipitator and a processing device for determining a location of a spark within an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) using data received from the at least one electromagnetic sensor.
[0007] In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present
invention a system for locating sparks in an electrostatic precipitator is disclosed wherein the system comprises at least one loop antenna, an electrostatic precipitator and a processing device for determining a location of a spark within an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) using data received from the at least one loop antenna.
[0008] In accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present
invention a method for locating sparks in an electrostatic precipitator is disclosed. The method comprises obtaining electromagnetic field data associated with the ESP and using the electromagnetic field data to determine a location of the spark.
2

DRAWINGS
[0009] These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention
will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
[0010] Fig 1 is a diagrammatical view of one embodiment of an electrostatic
precipitator.
[0011] Figure 2 illustrates a front view and a side view of an embodiment of the
electromagnetic sensor in Figure 1.
[0012] Figure 3 illustrates another view of an electrostatic precipitator to
determine ioss in electromagnetic field within the electrostatic precipitator.
[0013] Figure 4 illustrates another view of an electrostatic precipitator to illustrate
the electromagnetic field profile calculations.
[0014] Figure 5 illustrates a graph showing electromagnetic field profile mapped
at various locations within the electrostatic precipitator.
[0015] Figure 6 illustrates a process flow diagram depicting processing of signals
received by an electromagnetic sensor when sparks are generated in an ESP.
[0016] Figure 7 graphically depicts signals received on an oscilloscope in one
embodiment of the instant invention.
DETAILED DESRIPTION
[0017] As discussed in detail below, embodiments of the present invention
typically include at feast one electromagnetic sensor, an electrostatic precipitator and a processor. While the design of an electrostatic precipitator varies as per its application and operation in various industries, a typical electrostatic precipitator is comprised of a row of cathodes disposed between a set of collection plates, A high voltage of several
3

thousand volts is applied, that ionizes air around the cathodes. Air or gas to be purified of dust paricles or fine particulate is passed in the ESP adjacent the cathodes. The fine particulate or dust particles in the air or gas become negatively charged while passing adjacent the negatively charged cathodes and are attracted to the positively charged collection plates. Thus, dust particles or fine particulate build up on the collection plates and form a layer. The process of collection of fine particulate or dust particles continues at the expected pace as long as the high voltage is maintained and other factors do not affect the electrostatic precipitator. The various factors that affect the electrostatic precipitator and may lead to spark generation include, for example, resistivity of fine particles, an increase in field intensity, or an increase in the number of particles.
[0018] Sparks result in high current and hence, as per Ampere's law, a high
electro magnetic field is generated. While some electromagnetic waves associated with the electromagnetic field are transmitted, some are absorbed and some are reflected by the material present in the electrostatic precipitator, a sufficient part of the electro magnetic field reaches a sensor located adjacent the electrostatic precipitator. The electromagnetic sensors, for example loop antennas or other electromagnetic sensors, are used to detect an electromagnetic field developed in the electrostatic precipitator as a result of a spark in the cathodes. In one aspect of the invention one or more electromagnetic sensors are moved from one point of the electrostatic precipitator to another point to detect electromagnetic field intensity at various locations of the ESP. In another aspect of the invention multiple electromagnetic sensors are mounted adjacent to the ESP to detect electromagnetic field intensity and spark occurrences and locations. The electromagnetic sensors are typically optimally positioned adjacent to the electrostatic precipitator to maximize the absorption of the electromagnetic field and enhance the efficiency in detection of the sparks.
[0019] A system 10 comprising an electrostatic precipitator U, an
electromagnetic sensor 16 and a processor 17 is shown in FIG. 1. In the illustrated embodiment of the system 10 the electrostatic precipitator 11 includes a cathode 14 mounted on a supply wire 13 and a plurality of collection plates 12. Upon the occurrence of a spark 15 in the cathode 14, electromagnetic sensor 16 senses the electromagnetic
4

field generated at various locations within the electrostatic precipitator 13 and generates corresponding signals representative of the sensed electromagnetic field. The signals are sent to a processor 17 that is configured to process the signals from various locations of electrostatic precipitator 11 to generate an electromagnetic field profile. In one embodiment, the processor 17 segregates a peak electromagnetic profile from the generated electromagnetic field profile to detect and locate the sparks.
[0020] In one embodiment of the present invention, the electromagnetic sensors
16 are mounted on the top or roof of a respective electrostatic precipitator 11. Alternatively, the electromagnetic sensors 16 are handheld portable sensors, as discussed in greater detail below. The number and type of electromagnetic sensors 16 depends upon the type and size of the respective eiectrostatic precipitator 11.
[0021] In some embodiments, the electromagnetic field data received from
sensors 16 is raw and has a certain level of noise. Accordingly, it is often beneficial to remove noise from the electromagnetic data before sending it to the processor 17. Various noise filtering techniques can be used to ensure accurate processing of electromagnetic field data and corresponding accuracy in the detection of the sparks 15 and spark locations. In one embodiment, the noise filtering techniques or filter include defending of the data, spectral analysis of the data followed by Chebyshev Filtering for Noise Reduction. In another embodiment of the invention the noise filtering technique can also include Hilbert Transform for Envelope Analysis followed by Chebyshev Filtering for Noise Reduction or signal power detection.
[0022] Figure 2 illustrates a front view (21) and a side view (23) of an
embodiment of the electromagnetic sensor used in Figure I. In the illustrated embodiment, the electromagnetic sensor is a loop antenna (20). The loop antenna typically comprises coils of wire wound on a solid or a hollow core and includes a box loop with an air core. When an electromagnetic field interacts with the loop antenna, an electromagnetic flux 24 is created that induces a voltage, which voltage, in turn, can be transduced. If V denotes the voltage induced, Ho is the originated electromagnetic field intensity at the cathode, A is current, N is the number of turns, f is frequency of the
5

electromagnetic field then the voltage induced in the coils due to the electromagnetic flux is:
V = 2niJQNAH0f cose
[0023] Referring now to Figure 3, another view of an electrostatic precipitator is
shown to illustrate loss in electromagnetic field within the electrostatic precipitator. In the illustrated embodiment, the electromagnetic sensor 30 is a loop antenna 30. An exemplary embodiment of the loop antenna is described in FIG. 2. The electrostatic precipitator includes a supply wire 33 having multiple cathodes 34 and collection plates 32 and an electromagnetic sensor 30. A spark 15, as referenced in FIG. 1, originates at one of the cathodes 34 resulting in the generation of an electromagnetic field. The electromagnetic field is incident on a barrier, for example, the cathodes, electrostatic precipitator material, or collection plates that results in reflection, transmission or absorption of a fraction of energy of the electromagnetic field. This leads to reduction in the intensity of the electromagnetic field. In addition, the temperature or humidity of a carrier medium, such as, but not limited to, air, (not shown) reduces the intensity of the electromagnetic field. Hence, the intensity of the electromagnetic field that reaches the electromagnetic sensor(s) 30 is much lower than the intensity of the electromagnetic field originated at the cathode 34. In one embodiment, the electromagnetic sensor 30 is a low frequency sensor. The extent of reduction in electromagnetic field intensity of the electromagnetic field reaching the electromagnetic sensor is explained in detail below.
[0024] If Ht is the intensity of the electromagnetic field reaching the
electromagnetic sensor and H0 is the originating intensity of the electromagnetic field at the cathode, then H, may be expressed as:
6

rr _ ^\^i TT
wherein Z] and Z2 are electromagnetic field impedance and metal box impedance respectively. The electromagnetic field impedance Zj has a value equivalent to about 377 ohm for distant electromagnetic field and for near electromagnetic field Zi is given by 27rfjj.d, wherein d < X/2n. The metal box impedance Z2 is given by:


°^- Or 3.68xlO~\^-Jf

wherein u. is permeability and u is conductivity of the metal or material used. The total loss of electromagnetic field, H0-Ht> is:
\4.6 + \0\og^^dB + 3.34dfJurardB
wherein u,r i.e. permeability of the metal and crr is conductivity of metal depends upon the type of metal used. The electromagnetic field intensity H( that reaches the electromagnetic sensor is transduced by the electromagnetic sensor 30 at different locations of the electrostatic precipitator to generate electromagnetic profile data.
[0025] Figure 4 illustrates another view of an electrostatic precipitator to illustrate
the electromagnetic field profile calculations. The electrostatic precipitator includes a transformer 40 and a current inlet 42. The current inlet 42 is connected to the supply wire having cathodes 46 disposed therefrom. The cathodes 46 are disposed in between the coilection plates 44 and a spark 48 is generated in one of the cathodes 46. Generation of spark in the electrostatic precipitator leads to flow of current. Thus, as per Ampere's law generation of current leads to generation of electromagnetic field. As shown, if L is the distance between the current inlet and spark and d is the distance between supply wire and sensor then by using the Ampere's law and Biot Savart law electromagnetic field intensity B can be determined as illustrated below.
7

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2622-che-2009 form-5 28-10-2009.pdf 2009-10-28
1 2622-CHE-2009-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2017-07-13
2 2622-che-2009 assignment 28-10-2009.pdf 2009-10-28
2 2622-CHE-2009-FER.pdf 2016-10-14
3 2622-CHE-2009-Correspondence-Marked up F1,F3,F5,Notarially Certified-PA-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
3 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-3 19-04-2010.pdf 2010-04-19
4 2622-CHE-2009-MARKED UP F1, F3, F5, NOTARIALLY CERTIFIED COPY-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
4 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-13 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
5 2622-CHE-2009-Power of Attorney-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
5 2622-CHE-2009 POWER OF ATTORNEY 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
6 Form 13 [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
6 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-6 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
7 Marked Copy [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
7 2622-che-2009 form-5 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
8 Other Document [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
8 2622-che-2009 form-3 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
9 2622-CHE-2009 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 19-09-2014.pdf 2014-09-19
9 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-13 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
10 2622-che-2009 form-1 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
10 Form-1.pdf 2011-09-04
11 2622-che-2009 correspondence others 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
11 Form-3.pdf 2011-09-04
12 2622-CHE-2009 CORREPONDENCE OTHERS 06-06-2011.pdf 2011-06-06
12 2622-CHE-2009 FORM 18 20-05-2011.pdf 2011-05-20
13 2622-CHE-2009 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 20-05-2011.pdf 2011-05-20
13 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-3 06-06-2011.pdf 2011-06-06
14 2622-CHE-2009 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 20-05-2011.pdf 2011-05-20
14 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-3 06-06-2011.pdf 2011-06-06
15 2622-CHE-2009 CORREPONDENCE OTHERS 06-06-2011.pdf 2011-06-06
15 2622-CHE-2009 FORM 18 20-05-2011.pdf 2011-05-20
16 2622-che-2009 correspondence others 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
16 Form-3.pdf 2011-09-04
17 Form-1.pdf 2011-09-04
17 2622-che-2009 form-1 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
18 2622-CHE-2009 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 19-09-2014.pdf 2014-09-19
18 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-13 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
19 2622-che-2009 form-3 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
19 Other Document [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
20 2622-che-2009 form-5 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
20 Marked Copy [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
21 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-6 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
21 Form 13 [18-07-2016(online)].pdf 2016-07-18
22 2622-CHE-2009 POWER OF ATTORNEY 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
22 2622-CHE-2009-Power of Attorney-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
23 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-13 24-01-2011.pdf 2011-01-24
23 2622-CHE-2009-MARKED UP F1, F3, F5, NOTARIALLY CERTIFIED COPY-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
24 2622-CHE-2009 FORM-3 19-04-2010.pdf 2010-04-19
24 2622-CHE-2009-Correspondence-Marked up F1,F3,F5,Notarially Certified-PA-290716.pdf 2016-08-02
25 2622-CHE-2009-FER.pdf 2016-10-14
25 2622-che-2009 assignment 28-10-2009.pdf 2009-10-28
26 2622-CHE-2009-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2017-07-13
26 2622-che-2009 form-5 28-10-2009.pdf 2009-10-28