Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

"System And Method Of Aggregating The Knowledge Base Of Antivirus Software Applications"

Abstract: In accordance with this invention, a system, method, and computer-readable medium that aggregates the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications are provided. User mode applications, such as antivirus software applications, gain access to file system operations through a common information model, which obviates the need for antivirus software vendors to create kernel mode filters. When file system operations are available to antivirus software applications, the present invention may cause each antivirus software application installed on a computing device to perform a scan to determine if the data is malware.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
29 August 2005
Publication Number
31/2009
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMPUTER SCIENCE
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

MICROSOFT CORPORATION
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052, USA.

Inventors

1. ADRIAN M. MARINESCU
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052, USA.
2. ANIL FRANCIS THOMAS
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052, USA.
3. DAVID A. GOEBEL
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052, USA.
4. MIHAI COSTEA
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052, USA.

Specification

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF AGGREGATING THE KNOWLEDGE BASE OF ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to computing devices and, more particularly, to protection of computing devices against malware
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As more and more computers and other computing devices are interconnected through vanous networks, such as the Internet, computer security has become increasingly more important, particularly from invasions or attacks delivered over a network or over an information stream As those skilled in the art will recognize, these attacks come m many different forms, including, but certainly not limited to, computer viruses, computer worms, system component replacements, denial of service attacks, even misuse/abuse of legitimate computer system features, all of which exploit one or more computer system vulnerabilities for illegitimate purposes While those skilled in the art will realize that the vanous computer attacks are technically distinct from one another, for purposes of the present invention and for simplicity in description, all malicious computer programs that spread on computer networks, such as the Internet, will be generally referred to hereinafter as computer malware or, more simply, malware
When a computer system is attacked or "infected" by computer malware, the adverse results are varied, including disabling system devices, erasing or corrupting firmware, applications, or data files, transmitting potentially sensitive data to another location on the
network, shuttmg down the computer system, or causing the computer system to crash Yet another pernicious aspect of many, though not all, computer malware is that an infected computer system is used to infect other systems
A traditional defense against computer malware and, particularly, against computer viruses and worms, is commercially available antivirus software applications Generally described, an antivirus software application scans data, looking for identifiable patterns associated with computer malware Upon detecting a pattern associated with computer malware, the antivirus software application may respond by quarantining the malware or deleting the malware Unfortunately, antivirus software applications typically work best with known, identifiable computer malware Frequently, this is done by matching patterns within data to what is referred to as a "signature" of the malware
Typically, most operations performed by existing antivirus software applications occur when an operating system is in "user mode " As is known to those skilled in the art and others, computer programs such as antivirus software applications may execute in either "kernel mode" or "user mode " "Kernel mode" refers to processing that occurs at the most privileged and protected level of the operating system Kernel mode programs reside in protected memory at all times and provide basic operating system services "User mode" refers to processing that occurs at the application layer where access to kernel mode data is not available Previously a vendor of an antivirus software application that needed to access information and features available from kernel mode needed to build a kernel mode filter that interfaced with an operating system Unfortunately, each antivirus software vendor was required to develop a unique filter to access features available from kernel mode, such as the input/output (hereinafter referred to as "I/O"), scheduled to occur on a computing device Moreover, if each antivirus software application has a corresponding kernel mode filter to perform essentially the same task, a computing device suffers the performance burden of having duplicative code executing in several disparate filters all loaded m the kernel Still another disadvantage of existing technologies is that the user mode interface is inconsistent, non-uniform, and prone to errors Accordmgly, a need exists for a mechanism by which I/O scheduled to occur on a computing device is available to antivirus software applications without requiring an antivirus software vendor to implement a kernel mode filter
Numerous software vendors market antivirus software applications and maintain an ever-growing database of malware signatures In fact, one of the most important assets of antivirus software vendors is the knowledge base of signatures collected from known malware However, commercially available antivirus software applications are not always compatible with each other For example, m some instances, when two different antivirus software applications are installed on a computing device, data conflicts are known to occur As a result, users are unable to install multiple antivirus software applications on a computing device and receive the benefit of each application's knowledge base Accordingly, a need exists for a mechanism to aggregate the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications installed on the same computing device
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention addresses the above identified needs by providing a mechanism for aggregating the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications to determine if data associated with a computing device is malware One aspect of the present invention is a method that permits antivirus software applications to access data associated with I/O requests through a common information model The common information model obviates the need for antivirus software vendors to create kernel mode filters by providing the features that are typically available from kernel mode filters Then the common information model may cause the antivirus software applications to scan data associated with a computing device to determine if the data is malware When malware is detected, any attempt to read, store, or execute the malware is prevented
Another aspect of the present invention is a method that determines if a file associated with a computing device was previously identified as malware or previously established to be safe This aspect of the present invention includes associating a variable with a file when one or more antivirus software applications scans the file The variable indicates whether the file is malware and may be recalled at a later time For example, the variable may be recalled when a user attempts to execute the file If the variable indicates that the file is malware, any attempt to execute the file by the user fails Conversely, if the variable indicates that the file is not malware, an attempt to execute the file will succeed without requiring antivirus software applications to perform duplicative scans of the file
Another aspect of the present invention is a highly efficient method for allowing antivirus software applications to access file data This aspect of the present invention includes creatmg a file mapping section object that will be used to perform a scan by one or more antivirus software applications Then a user mode application that interfaces with antivirus applications is provided with data that may be used to access the file mapping section object Finally, a view of the file that may be accessed by antivirus software applications is generated This aspect of the present invention provides a basic set of file system operations to antivirus software applications that improves the speed in which scanning is performed
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a computing device is provided that aggregates the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications The computing device includes a security service application, one or more antivirus software applications, and a generalized security filter that mcludes a scan cache and a data mapping module The generalized security filter and the security service application collectively function to provide a common information model to the antivirus software applications The common information model allows antivirus software applications to access I/O requests scheduled to occur on the computing device When an I/O request is intercepted, the antivirus software applications may interact with the common information model to schedule a scan When scans occur, the security service application is aware of the different antivirus software applications installed on the computing device and is able to prevent data conflicts
In still another embodiment, a computer-readable medium is provided with contents, 1 e, a program that causes a computing device to operate in accordance with the methods described herein
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this mvention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram illustrating the hierarchical structure of a computmg device in accordance with the prior art,
FIGURE 2 is a block diagram of the components of a computing device that includes antivirus software applications suitable to scan for malware m accordance with the prior art,
FIGURE 3 is a block diagram of the components of a computing device that includes antivirus software applications suitable to identify malware in accordance with the present invention,
FIGURE 4 is a flow diagram illustrating one exemplary embodiment of a method that aggregates the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications in accordance with the present invention,
FIGURE 5 is a pictorial depiction of a scan cache suitable to store and recall data in conjunction with the method depicted m FIGURE 4, and
FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram illustrating one exemplary embodiment of an access method that may be used m conjunction with the method depicted in FIGURE 4 to provide antivirus software applications with access to file data in accordance with the present invention
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In accordance with this invention, a system, method, and computer-readable medium that aggregate the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications is provided User mode applications such as antivirus software applications are provided with access to file system operations such as I/O requests through a common information model, which obviates the need for antivirus software vendors to create kernel mode filters When an I/O request is intercepted, the present invention may cause each antivirus software application installed on a computing device to perform a scan to determine if data associated with the request is malware Although the present invention will be described in the context of antivirus software applications, those skilled in the relevant art and others will appreciate that the present invention is also applicable to other areas of software development Accordingly, the described embodiments of the present invention should be construed as illustrative m nature and not as limiting
FIGURE 1 is a block diagram of a computing device 100 configured in accordance with the prior art The computing device 100 may be any one of a variety of devices including, but not limited to, personal computing devices, server-based computing devices,
personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, other electronic devices havmg some type of memory, and the like For ease of illustration and because they are not important for an understanding of the present invention, FIGURE 1 does not show the typical components of many computing devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a printer or other I/O devices, a display, etc
The computing device 100 illustrated in FIGURE 1 includes a hardware platform 102, an operating system 104, and an application platform 106 For ease of illustration and because they are not important to an understanding of the present invention, FIGURE 1 does not show the components typically included in the hardware platform 102, such as a central processing unit, memory, hard drive, etc Also, for similar reasons, FIGURE 1 does not show any components of the operating system 104 or the application platform 106
As shown in FIGURE 1, the components of computing device 100 are layered with the hardware platform 102 on the bottom layer and the application platform 106 on the top layer The layering of FIGURE 1 illustrates that, preferably, the present invention is embodied in a hierarchical environment Each layer included in the computing device 100 is dependent on systems in lower layers More specifically, the application platform 106 runs on top of the operating system 104 and is not able to directly access components of the hardware platform 102 Instead, any access to the hardware platform 102 by the application platform 106 is managed by the operating system 104 As known to those skilled m the art and others, the operating system 104 provides an application programming interface ("API") to the application platform 106 that defines the services available to the application platform 106
FIGURE 2 is a block diagram suitable to illustrate the prior art process of providing antivirus software applications with access to data associated with an I/O request As known to those skilled in the art and others, computer users have on-going needs to read and write data to memory devices, such as hard drives, floppy disks, random access memory, compact disks ("CDs"), etc For example, a common operation provided by most software applications is to open a file stored on a memory device and display the contents of the file on a computer display However, since opening a file may cause malware associated with
the file to be executed, antivirus software applications typically perform a scan or other analysis of a file before the open operation is satisfied If malware is detected, the antivirus software application that performed the scan may prevent the malware from being executed, for example, by causing the open operation to fail Also, an antivirus software application may present a computer user with options for removmg the malware or placing the malware in a "quarantine"
As known to those skilled in the art and others, I/O requests made in a computing device are handled by a component of the operating system 104 (FIGURE 1) known as an I/O system In order to protect a computmg device against malware, antivirus software applications are notified when I/O requests are received With reference now to FIGURE 2, the known process of providing antivirus software applications with access to data associated with an I/O request will be described The computing device 100 illustrated in FIGURE 2 includes an I/O system 200, a local or remote I/O device 202, a user application 204, antivirus filters 206-210, and antivirus software applications/drivers 212-216 residing in either user or kernel mode When a request to perform I/O is generated from a user application, such as the user application 204, the I/O system 200 receives the request As illustrated in FIGURE 2, user applications operate in user mode and generate I/O requests that are satisfied by the I/O system 200 in kernel mode Prior to a request being satisfied, the antivirus filters 206, 208, and 210 may be notified that an I/O request is scheduled to be satisfied In response, the antivirus filters 206, 208, and 210, may each notify their respective antivirus software applications/drivers 212, 214, and 216 that data associated with the I/O request should be scanned If data associated with the I/O request is malware, the antivirus software application/driver may be configured to prevent the I/O request from bemg satisfied Conversely, if an I/O request does not involve malware, the I/O system 200 causes the I/O request to be satisfied For example, the I/O system 200 may cause data to be written to I/O device 202 that, in some systems, is a local hardware device such as a hard drive, floppy disk, flash memory, tape drive, compact disk ("CD"), etc Alternatively, the I/O device 202 may be a remote hardware device connected to the computing device 100 through a network connection
Unfortunately, the prior art process illustrated in FIGURE 2 of providing antivirus software applications access to data associated with an I/O request has the disadvantage of requiring antivirus software vendors to each develop a kernel mode filter As illustrated in FIGURE 2, antivirus filters 206, 208, and 210 may only be used in conjunction with specific antivirus software applications Moreover, since each antivirus software application maintains a kernel mode filter to perform essentially the same task, the computer system suffers the performance burden of having duplicative code simultaneously loaded in memory
Unfortunately, the prior art process illustrated in FIGURE 2 of providing antivirus software applications access to data associated with an I/O request also has the disadvantage of potentially hindering the removal of malware from a computing device When two or more antivirus software applications are installed on the same computing devices, data conflicts are known to occur For example, two antivirus software applications may determine that a file stored on a computing device is infected with malware The first antivirus software application may attempt to "disinfect" the file by deleting file data However, the second antivirus software application will typically be notified when the first antivirus software application makes the attempt to delete the file data In this instance, the second antivirus software application may be configured to prevent any access to the infected file Also, the first antivirus software application may be configured to prevent other applications, such as the second antivirus software application, from accessmg the infected file Obviously, in this situation, malware cannot be deleted by either the first antivirus software application or the second antivirus software application
FIGURE 3 is a block diagram suitable to illustrate the process of providing antivirus software applications with access to data associated with an I/O request in accordance with the present invention The following is intended to provide an exemplary overview of one suitable computing device 300 in which the present invention may be implemented The computing device 300 illustrated in FIGURE 3 includes several components that may operate in a similar manner as components of like name described above with reference to FIGURE 2 The computing device 300 includes an I/O system 302, an I/O device 304, a user application 306, antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312, a security service
application 314, and a generalized security filter 316 that includes a scan cache 318 and a data mapping module 320 The software implemented routines implemented by the present invention are contained m the security service application 314 and the generalized security filter 316 that includes the scan cache 318 and the data mapping module 320 As illustrated in FIGURE 3, the security service application 314 executes in user mode and the generalized security filter 316 executes in kernel mode Generally described, the routines implemented by the present invention provide a way for user-mode applications, such as antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312, to access data associated with I/O requests scheduled to be satisfied by the I/O system 302 As illustrated in FIGURE 3, antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312 may function without using a kernel mode filter Also, the computing device 300 may be used to aggregate the knowledge base of multiple antivirus software applications to scan data and determine if the data is infected with malware Even though FIGURE 3 and the accompanying text uses antivirus software applications to describe embodiments of the present invention, the software-implemented routines of the present invention may be used in conjunction with other types of applications Similarly, the software-implemented routines of the present invention may communicate with services that perform specific functions instead of applications Thus, components of the computing device 300 illustrated in FIGURE 3 should be construed as exemplary and not limiting
As mentioned above, some of the software implemented routines of the present invention are located in the generalized security filter 316 In general terms describing one embodiment of the present invention, the generalized security filter 316 intercepts I/O requests made from user applications, such as user application 306 In response, the generalized security filter 316 performs routines designed to prevent the spread or execution of malware in the computing device 300 More specifically, the generalized security filter 316 communicates with the security service application 314 (described below) to cause the antivirus software applications to analyze a file associated with the request and determine whether the file contains malware If malware is detected, the generalized security filter 316 is operative to communicate with the I/O system 302 and prevents a request from being satisfied
As illustrated in FIGURE 3, the generalized security filter 316 includes a scan cache 318 that improves the speed in which the present invention analyzes I/O requests intercepted from the I/O system 302 For example, as known to those skilled in the art and others, user applications will frequently make successive I/O requests directed to the same file In this instance, the present invention may intercept a first I/O request and cause the antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312 to scan the file and validate that the file is not infected with malware In instances when the file is not mfected, successive I/O requests do not trigger a scan of the file Instead, the scan cache 318 tracks the status of files with regard to whether the files are infected with malware so that unnecessary scans are not performed Files are categorized as being (1) known malware, (2) known safe, or (3) unknown Since scanning a file is a resource-intensive process, preventing unnecessary scans improves the speed of the present invention As will be described in further detail below, the scan cache 318 may be used in conjunction with other systems that track the state of files in addition to a system designed to prevent the spread or execution of malware For example, some software applications allow users to "back up" or save data to a secondary hardware device In this instance, the software application tracks the state of each file on a computing device with regard to whether the secondary hardware device has the most recent version of the file The scan cache 318 may be used in conjunction with this type of system to track the state of files on a computing device
The generalized security filter 316 includes a data mapping module 320 that improves the reliability and speed in which antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312 are able to scan a file Typically, when modern antivirus software applications intercept a file open operation, a second file handle is opened that is used to read file data However, as known to those skilled in the art and others, a file may be "locked" to prevent multiple applications from simultaneously accessing the file An antivirus software application may not be able to read the data in this instance when another application "locked" the file Further, opening a new handle may prevent another application from opening the file, which has caused application failure in the prior art However, the data mapping module 320 provides applications, such as antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312, with access to file data without requirmg the creation of a second file handle Instead, the data mapping
module 320 provides applications with access to a low-level object from which file data may be read Access to the low-level object is available regardless of whether another application has "locked" the file Also, creation of the second file handle requires substantial computational resources Thus, allowing antivirus software applications to read file data using a low-level object improves the speed in which the antivirus software applications are able to perform scans for malware As will be described in further detail below, the data mapping module 320 may be used m conjunction with other systems that read file data For example, some software applications encrypt a file before the file is stored on a hardware device and decrypt the file when retrieval from the hardware device occurs In this instance, the data mapping module 320 may be used to provide an efficient way for an encryption application to access data m the file
As illustrated in FIGURE 3, the computing device 300 includes a security service application 314 that, among other things, acts as an interface to antivirus software applications installed on the computing device 300 The security service application 314 allows antivirus software applications to register and create a scanning profile The scanning profile identifies the I/O requests that an antivirus application finds "interesting " For example, a scanning profile may indicate that an antivirus software application will perform a scan when an I/O request is directed to a file that has an "unknown" state with regard to being infected with malware Alternatively, a scanning profile may be defined so that an antivirus software application performs a scan when certain types of I/O requests are generated In any event, antivirus software applications register with the security service application 314 and create a profile that defines the circumstances in which a scan will be performed The security service application 314 is responsible for schedulmg scans between the different registered antivirus software applications
Implementations of the present invention are not limited to the exemplary computing device 300 shown in FIGURE 3 For example, FIGURE 3 and the accompanying text describe antivirus software applications 308, 310, and 312 that execute in user mode However, the software-implemented routines of the present invention may be configured to communicate with antivirus software filters that execute in kernel mode Also, the computing device 300 is shown as receiving I/O requests from the user application 306
However, as known to those skilled in the art and others, I/O requests may be received from other sources, such as protocols used for communication between remote computing devices Moreover, the I/O device 304 is illustrated as being a hardware device that is a component of the computing device 300 However, the I/O device 304 may be a remote hardware device connected to the computing device 300 through a network connection Alternatively, the I/O request may not be directed to a hardware device Instead, an I/O request may be directed to an object that is capable of being accessed using a create file command, including, but not limited to, pipes, communication resources, disk devices, consoles, mail slots, etc Thus, the components of the computing device 300 illustrated in FIGURE 3 should be construed as exemplary and not limiting
FIGURE 4 is a flow diagram of one exemplary method 400 designed to aggregate the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications In summary, the method 400 exposes antivirus software applications to I/O requests through a common information model When an I/O request is generated, the method 400 determines if a scan by one or more antivirus software applications installed on a computing device is necessary In instances where a scan is necessary, the method 400 identifies antivirus software applications that are "interested" in the type of I/O request that was generated Through the common information model, one or more antivirus software applications may perform a scan to determine if malware is associated with the I/O request With continuing reference to FIGURES 1-3 and the accompanying descriptions, an exemplary method 400 that aggregates the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications illustrated m FIGURE 4 will now be described
At decision block 402, the method 400 remains idle and waits for an I/O request that is typically received by a kernel mode component of an operating system, such as the I/O system 302 (FIGURE 3) As will be appreciated by those skilled m the art, I/O requests may be generated through a variety of different mechanisms For example, a user of a word processing program may cause an "open file" command to be issued from a drop-down menu or other graphically based input system To satisfy the "open file" command, the word processing program may issue an API call that requires obtaining file data from a memory device By way of another example, a user of a Web browser program may issue a command
to download a file from a remote computer To satisfy the command, the Web browser program may issue an API call to store a data stream on a hardware device, such as the I/O device 304 (FIGURE 3) When an I/O request is generated, the I/O system 302 interacts with hardware devices to satisfy the request However, the method 400 intercepts I/O requests before they are satisfied by the I/O system 302 to prevent the execution and/or spread of malware
At decision block 404, the method 400 determines whether the I/O request received at block 402 is a command that causes a new file to be created One type of I/O request that may be intercepted at block 402 causes a new file to be created This type of request cannot expose a computing device to malware As described below at block 422, a command that causes a new file to be created is handled differently than other I/O requests received by the method 400 A command that causes a new file to be created may be generated using any one of a number of different commands available from modern operating systems For example, in the context of a Windows® operating system, a new file may be created using APIs specifically designed to create a new file, such as the "CreateFile" API Alternatively, a new file may be created in certain circumstances using other APIs, such as the open, overwrite, and supersede APIs If the request received at block 404 is a command that causes a new file to be created, the method 400 proceeds to block 422 described below Alternatively, if the request is not a command that causes a new file to be created, the method 400 proceeds to block 406
At decision block 406, the method 400 determines whether the I/O request intercepted at block 402 has the potential to expose a computmg device to malware As known to those skilled in the art and others, certain I/O requests may not have the potential to expose a computing device to malware For example, if an I/O request is an "open file" command and the specified file does not contain any data, satisfying the command cannot expose a computing device to malware Similarly, the I/O request received at block 402 may be a command to open or close a directory In this instance, the I/O request cannot expose a computing device to malware It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that other types of I/O requests do not have the potential to expose a computing device to malware Therefore, the examples described above should be construed as exemplary and
not limiting If the request received at block 402 does not have the potential to expose a computing device to malware, the method 400 proceeds to block 426 described below Alternatively, if the request received at block 402 does have the potential to expose a computing device to malware, the method 400 proceeds to block 408
At block 408, the method 400 queries a database, such as the scan cache 318, and identifies the state of the file that is the object of the I/O request received at block 402 As described in further detail below, when one or more antivirus software applications scans a file for malware, a variable is associated with the file The variable represents one of three possible states, including (1) known malware, (2) known good, or (3) unknown
For illustrative purposes and by way of example only, the contents of a sample scan cache 318 is shown m FIGURE 5 As illustrated, the scan cache 318 consists of three columns, each of which contains multiple entries The columns are identified as FILEINDX502, FIRST BIT 504, and SECOND BIT 506 The FILEINDX 502 field contains a value that may be used to uniquely identify a file As known to those skilled m the art and others, memory devices are typically partitioned into logical units referred to as volumes Each volume has a central location where information about files on the volume is stored For example, the Windows® NT File System ("NTFS") maintains a master file table ("MFT") that contains a record for each file on a volume When a file is created, a new record for the file is stored m the MFT and a predetermined amount of space is allocated to store file attributes For example, each file is assigned a unique file index that represents the file's location m the MFT As described in further detail below, when a file is scanned by one or more antivirus software applications in accordance with present invention, the index value associated with the file in the MFT is entered in the FILEINDX 502 field of the scan cache 318 The FIRST BIT 504, and SECOND BIT 506 fields each store a value that collectively identifies the state of the file For example, both the FIRST BIT 504 and SECOND BIT 506 fields contain a value that is either a "0" or a "1 " In one embodunent of the present invention, if the FIRST BIT 504 field contains a "1" and the SECOND BIT 506 field also contains a "0," then the state of the file is "known malware " Alternatively, if the FIRST BIT 504 field contains a "0" and the SECOND BIT 506 field contains a "1," then the state of the file is "known good " Also, if the FIRST BIT 504 field contains a "0" and the
SECOND BIT 506 field contains a "0," then the state of the file is "unknown " Although FIGURE 5 illustrates a scan cache 318 that has specific attributes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the scan cache 318 may operate with more or fewer than all of the listed attributes
Conventional techniques for tracking the state of a file are error-prone and resource intensive when compared to the scan cache 318 For example, one known technique for tracking whether a file is infected with malware uses a hash table When an I/O request is intercepted, the hash table is searched using a string-based file name as the hash key However, file names do not always uniquely identify a file For example, a file may be associated with two or more file names when a user creates a "link" to reference the file In this instance, a hash table may contain multiple entries for the same file As a result, antivirus software applications may perform unnecessary scans when a file is referenced by two or more file names As described above, the scan cache 318 uses a unique file index obtained from the MFT to identify a file that prevents duplicative scans from occurring Also, computing a hash key or searching for a string-based file name is resource intensive when compared to querying bits from a bitmap For example, hash tables typically consume enough memory that entries in a hash table are eventually removed to accommodate new files However, entries in the scan cache 318 require a sufficiently small amount of memory that the entries will not be removed to accommodate new entries
As mentioned above, the scan cache 318 may be used in conjunction with other systems to track the state of one or more files By way of example only, the scan cache 318 may be implemented in conjunction with (1) "backup" applications to track the state of files with regard to their storage on a secondary hardware device, (2) encryption/decryption applications to track whether files are encrypted, (3) and content filtering applications to track whether files contain inappropriate content As known to those skilled in the art and others, bits for storing additional data may be added to the scan cache 318 to accommodate the needs of these types of systems
Returning to FIGURE 4, at decision block 410 the method 400 determines if the state associated with a file is "known good" or free from a malware infection In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the determination regarding whether a file is "known
good" is made by analyzing data contained in a database, such as bit information contained in the scan cache 318 Since querying a database and analyzing information associated with a file index may be performed using techniques generally known in the art, description of the technique used by the present invention is not provided here If a file is identified as "known good" the method 400 proceeds to block 426 described below Alternatively, if the file is associated with a different state than "known good" the method 400 proceeds to block 412
At decision block 412 the method 400 determines if the state associated with the file is "known malware" Similar to the instance where the file is identified as being "known good," the determination of whether a file is "known malware" is made by analyzing data contained m a database, such as bit information contained in the scan cache 318 If the file state is identified as "known malware" the method 400 proceeds to block 428 described below Alternatively, if the file is associated with an unknown state the method 400 proceeds to block 414
At block 414 the method 400 provides antivirus software applications executing m user mode with access to file data If block 414 is reached, the state associated with the file is "unknown" and the method 400 will cause one or more antivirus software applications to scan the file that is the object of the I/O request intercepted at block 402 The present invention provides antivirus software applications with an efficient way to access file data so that a scan for malware may be performed quickly One embodiment of a method for providing antivirus software applications with access to file data is described below with reference to FIGURE 6
At block 416, the method 400 selects an antivirus software application that will perform a scan of the file that is the object of the I/O request received at block 402 As described previously with reference to FIGURE 3, aspects of the present invention allow antivirus software applications to register and create a scanning profile The scanning profile defines I/O requests that are "interesting" to an antivirus software application The method 400 checks the scanning profile of antivirus software applications installed on a computing device and sequentially selects the antivirus software applications that are "interested" in the intercepted I/O request
At block 418, the method 400 causes the selected antivirus software application to scan data and determine if the file that is the object of the I/O request received at block 402 is infected with malware As described above, antivirus software applications typically match patterns of data to a malware "signature" when determining if an infection exists However, increasingly, antivirus software applications are using proactive malware detection techniques For example, some antivirus applications emulate program behavior by causing data to "execute" inside a virtual operating environment If the misuse/abuse of resources in the virtual operating environment is detected, then an antivirus software application determines that a file is infected with malware In any event, at block 418, the selected antivirus software application obtains file data and performs actions to determine if file data is infected with malware As described in further detail below with reference to FIGURE 6, file data may be obtained using a common information model that is available to registered antivirus software applications
In addition to making a determination whether a malware infection exists, an antivirus software application may perform corrective action at block 418 As known to those skilled in the art and others, modern antivirus software applications may be able to delete data identified as malware or otherwise correct a malware infection In the event that malware is detected at block 418, then the selected antivirus software application is allowed to take corrective action Since only one antivirus software application may be selected at a time, any corrective action taken at block 418 is performed without the possibility of data conflicts Stated differently, the method 400 schedules the corrective action taken by antivirus software application to occur sequentially, which means that data views are coherent with respect to other antivirus software applications
At decision block 420, the method 400 determines if any additional antivirus software applications will be selected As described previously, the method 400 may be used to aggregate the knowledge base of a plurality of antivirus software applications to detect the presence of malware If additional antivirus software applications will not be selected, the method 400 proceeds to block 422 discussed below Conversely, if additional antivirus software applications will be selected, the method 400 proceeds back to block 416 and
blocks 416 through 420 repeat until all of the antivirus software applications "interested" in the I/O request intercepted at block 402 are able to perform a scan
At block 422, the state of a file is stored in a database, such as the scan cache 318 As described above, in certain instances, the method 400 may cause antivirus software applications to scan file data and make a determination whether a file is infected with malware In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, if one or more antivirus software applications detects the presence of malware and is unable to correct the infection, the file is marked as "known malware" in the scan cache 318 In this embodiment, if none of the antivirus software applications detects the presence of malware, the file is marked as "known good" in the scan cache 318 It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art and others that there are other possible embodiments for making a determination that a file is infected with malware For example, the method 400 may require that a majority of antivirus software applications installed on a computing device detect malware before a file is identified as "known malware" in the scan cache 318 More generally, the method 400 may be implemented with a system that calculates a weighted value for the result set generated by the antivirus software applications In this instance, if the weighted value is over a threshold amount, then the file is marked as "known malware" in the scan cache 318 Since systems that calculate weighted values based on input received from an application are generally known in the art, further description of these systems is not provided here
As described above at block 404, the I/O request intercepted at block 402 may be a command that causes a new file to be created In this instance, the command can be satisfied without exposmg a computing device to malware At block 422, the state of the file that is the subject of the command is identified as "known good" in the scan cache 318 As described above at block 408, m one embodiment of the present invention, a unique file index value is obtained from the MFT and used to identify files m the scan cache 318 However, when a file is deleted from a computing device, the MFT may reassign the file index value associated with the deleted file to a new file The present invention does not change the state of a file as recorded in the scan cache 318 when a file is deleted Instead, when a command that causes a new file to be created is received, the method simply
overwrites the state of the deleted file with the state of the file that is the object of the command
As described above, the method 400 causes the state of a file to be stored in a database such as the scan cache 318 In some instances, additional administrative procedures may be performed at block 422 to enable the scan cache 318 to accommodate growth in the file system For example, in one embodiment of the present invention, when an I/O request is directed to a previously unidentified file that does not maintain an entry in the scan cache 318, a larger scan cache is created The contents of the smaller scan cache 318 are copied to the larger scan cache along with the state of the previously unidentified file An optimization of this embodiment causes the memory allocated to the scan cache 318 to grow by a predetermined percentage above the minimum required to accommodate the previously unidentified file for additional files that are yet to be the object of an I/O request
At decision block 424, the method 400 determines if the state associated with a file is "known malware " The method 400 reaches block 424 when a command that causes a new file to be created is intercepted or a file with a state that is "unknown" is scanned by one or more antivirus software applications In either instance, the state associated with the file is stored in a database such as the scan cache 318 Thus, determining if a file is mfected with malware at decision block 424 is made by recalling previously stored data If the file state is identified as malware, the method 400 proceeds to block 428 described below Alternatively, if the file is not identified as malware the method 400 proceeds to block 426
At block 426, the method 400 returns program execution back to a component of the operating system such as the I/O system 302 (FIGURE 3) As described previously, the method 400 intercepts I/O requests before they are satisfied to prevent the execution and/or spread of malware If block 426 is reached, the I/O request intercepted at block 402 is either not capable of infecting a computing device with malware or involves data that was scanned and identified as not being malware by antivirus software applications installed on a computing device In either instance, satisfying the I/O request will not result in the execution and/or spread of malware Thus, after program execution is returned to the I/O system 302, the I/O request is satisfied in accordance with the prior art Then, the method 400 proceeds to block 430, where it terminates
At block 428, the method 400 returns program execution back to a component of the operating system such as the I/O system 302 However, if block 428 is reached, the I/O request intercepted at block 402 may result in the execution and/or spread of malware Thus, after program execution is returned to the I/O system 302, the I/O request fails and the computer user is informed of the malware infection Then the method 400 proceeds to block 430, where it terminates
Implementations of the present invention are not limited to the exemplary method 400 shown in FIGURE 4 For example, the method 400 is illustrated as having a discrete beginning and end However, in actual embodiments of the present invention, I/O requests are mtercepted in a continuous process When sufficient information exists to believe that an I/O request will result in the execution and/or spread of malware, then the method 400 causes the I/O request to fail Also, the present invention is not limited to the examples provided above For example, the method 400 was primarily described in the context of scanning file data However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the method 400 may be used to scan other units of data without departing from the scope of the present invention
FIGURE 6 is a flow diagram of one exemplary access method 600 that may be used in conjunction with the method 400 described above with reference to FIGURE 4 to provide antivirus software applications with access to file data m a highly optimized manner In summary, the method 600 includes creating a section object that will be used by one or more antivirus software applications to perform a scan Then a user mode application that interfaces with the antivirus software applications is provided with information necessary to access the section object Finally, a view of the section object is created that allows one or more antivirus software applications to perform basic file system operations With continuing reference to FIGURES 1-5 and the accompanying descriptions, an exemplary access method 600 illustrated in FIGURE 6 will now be described
At decision block 602, the access method 600 remains idle until a scan request is received As described previously, the security service application 314 (FIGURE 3) acts as an interface to antivirus software applications installed on the computing device 300 An antivirus software application may create a scanning profile that defines the circumstances in
which the antivirus software application will perform a scan At block 602, the security service application 314 (FIGURE 3) receives a scan request from an antivirus software application Since communicating a request between two user mode applications may be implemented using techniques generally known in the art, further description of these techniques is not provided here
At block 604, a section object of the file that will be scanned by one or more antivirus software applications is created As known to those skilled m the art and others, section objects allow kernel and user mode applications to share data In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the security service application 314 makes a request to the generalized security filter 316 to create a section object of the file that will be scanned As illustrated in FIGURE 2, before the file mappmg section object is created, the operatmg system 104 changes from user mode to kernel mode More specifically, the operatmg system 104 changes from user mode to kernel mode after the security service application 314, which executes in user mode, makes the request to the generalized security filter 316 which executes m kernel mode When the change to kernel mode is complete, the generalized security filter 316 responds to the request by identifying the file that will be scanned and invoking a function that causes the file mapping section object to be created
At block 606, information necessary to access the file that will be scanned is made available to a user-mode application More specifically, the file mapping section object created at block 604 is inserted by the generalized security filter 316 into the object table of the security service application 314 As known to those skilled in the art and others, modern operating systems typically execute programs inside a predetermined domain For example, in some operating systems, a program is only able to access objects referenced m a data structure unique to the program known as an object table By inserting the section object created at block 604 into the object table associated with the security service application 314, the section object created at block 604 is made available to the security service application 314 As illustrated in FIGURE 2, after the file mapping section object is inserted into the object table of the security service application 314, the operatmg system 104 changes from kernel mode to user mode
At decision block 608, the access method 600 remains idle and waits for an antivirus software application to request file data As described previously, when an I/O operation is intercepted, one or more antivirus software applications may interact with a common information model to schedule a scan In order to complete the scan, an antivirus software application may need to perform basic file system operations For example, typically, an antivirus software application will "read" file data and compare the data to known malware signatures In accordance with the present invention, an antivirus software application is able to perform basic file system operations using a common information model available to applications registered with the security service application 314 In one embodiment of the present invention, the common information model is available to registered applications in the form of a set of APIs In any event, at decision block 608, the access method 600 remains idle and waits for an antivirus software to request file data
At decision block 610, the access method 600 determines if a view of the file that will be scanned needs to be mapped into the memory space of the security service application 314 To accomplish efficient use of the security service application's 314 virtual address space, especially as multiple scans of unique files may be occurring simultaneously, a "view" of a file may be mapped into the memory space of the application that allows an application to access portions of file data Smce all file data may not be loaded m the memory space of an application at one time, new views are mapped when data not available from the current view is requested If the data requested at block 608 is not available from a view mapped in the memory space of the security service application 314, then the access 600 method determines that a new view needs to be mapped and proceeds to block 612 Conversely, if the data requested at block 608 is accessible from a view mapped into the memory space of the security service application 314, then the access method 600 proceeds to block 614 described below
At block 612, a view of the section object created at block 604 is mapped, allowing a user-mode application, such as the security service application 314, to satisfy requests for file data The security service application 314 obtains data provided by the generalized security filter 316 that identifies the file that will be scanned If a view is already mapped in the memory space of the security service application 314 the access method 600 makes an API
call to the operating system 104 that causes the current view to be removed Then, the security service application 314 makes another API call to the operating system 104 that causes a new view to be mapped In response, the operating system 104 maps a view for the file from which the requested data may be accessed In the context of Wmdows® operating systems, files may be mapped in and out of an application's memory space using the "MapViewOfFileO" and "UnMapViewOfFile()" APIs However, the example provided herein should be construed as exemplary and not limiting
At block 614, the data requested at block 608 is communicated to the antivirus software application where the request originated When the necessary view is mapped (at block 612) into the memory space of the security service application 314, systems are able to transmit the data to the requesting antivirus software application using methods generally known in the art
At decision block 616, the access method 600 determines if the antivirus software application that generated the scan request received at block 602 has completed accessing file data As described previously, the security service application 314 serves as an interface by providmg a basic set of file system operations to antivirus software applications installed on a computing device When an antivirus software application finishes scanning a file, the application communicates to the security service application 314 that the scan is complete and the access method 600 proceeds to block 618, where it terminates Conversely, if the antivirus software application has not finished scanning the file and continues accessing file data, then the access method 600 proceeds back to blocks 608 through 616 until the antivirus software application has finished scanning the file
The access method 600 may be used in conjunction with other systems to provide a very fast way to perform basic file system operations By way of example only, the access method 600 may be implemented in conjunction with (1) encryption/decryption applications to read and write data to a file, and (2) content filtering applications to read file data and determine if the file data contains inappropriate material However, since the access method 600 may be used by any type of application to perform basic file system operations, the examples provided herein should be construed as exemplary and not limiting
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

We Claims :-

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows
1 In a computing device that includes a plurality of antivirus software
applications, a computer-implemented method of aggregating the knowledge base of the
antivirus software applications to prevent the execution or spread of malware, the method
comprising
(a) intercepting a request before the request is satisfied,
(b) providing the antivirus software applications with access to a file associated with the request,
(c) causing the antivirus software applications to analyze the file associated with the request to determine if the file contains malware, and
(d) if the file contains malware, preventing the request from being satisfied

2 The method of Claim 1, further comprising if the file does not contain malware, allowing the request to be satisfied
3 The method of Claim 1, further comprising creating a database for tracking the state of the file that was analyzed by the antivirus software applications
4 The method of Claim 3, wherein the database associates a file index value with a variable that represents the state of the file
5 The method of Claim 4, wherein associating the file index value with a variable in the database includes

(a) determining if the file index value is entered in the database, and
(b) if the file index value is not in the database
(l) obtaining the file index value from a data structure that maintains a unique file index value for each file on a volume, and
(n) entering the file index value in the database
6 The method of Claim 5, further comprising
(a) if the file contains malware, associating a variable with the file index value in the database that indicates the file contains malware, and
(b) conversely, if the file does not contain malware, associating a variable with the file index value in the database that indicates the file does not contain malware

7 The method of Claim 6, further comprising returning the variable associated with the file index value in response to a query
8 The method of Claim 6, wherein the variable associated with the file index value in the database consists of two bits
9 The method of Claim 5, wherein the data structure that maintains a unique file index value for each file on a volume is a master file table
10 The method of Claim 1, wherein intercepting the request includes determining whether the request has the potential to expose a computing device to malware
11 The method of Claim 10, wherein requests that do not have the potential to expose a computing device to malware include

(a) a command that causes a new file to be created,
(b) an open file command directed to a file that does not contain data, and
(c) a command directed to a directory
12 The method of Claim 1, wherein providing the antivirus software applications
with access to a file associated with the request includes
(a) creating a file mapping section object, and
(b) making the file mapping section object accessible to a service application, and
(c) creating a view of the file based on the file mapping section object that is accessible to the antivirus software applications
13 The method of Claim 12, wherein the view of the file is accessible to one antivirus software application at a time
14 The method of Claim 12, wherein the service application schedules requests to access the file by the virus software applications
15 The method of Claim 12, wherein making the file mapping section object accessible to a service application includes inserting the file mapping section object into the object table associated with the service application
16 The method of Claim 1, wherein the antivirus software applications access the file associated with the request without implementing a kernel mode filter
17 The method of Claim 1, wherein the antivirus software applications access the file associated with the request without creating a file handle
18 The method of Claim 1, wherein causing the antivirus software applications to analyze the file associated with the request to determine if the file contains malware includes

(a) creating a service application that communicates with the antivirus software applications that execute in user mode, and
(b) allowing the antivirus software applications to register with the service application and create a scanning profile

19 The method of Claim 18, wherein the scanning profile defines when an antivirus software application will access the file
20 The method of Claim 18, wherein the scanning profile defines when an antivirus software application will disinfect the computing device of malware
21 The method of Claim 1, wherein the determination that the file contains malware is made when all of the antivirus software applications that analyzed the file identified a signature characteristic of malware
22 The method of Claim 1, wherein the determination that the file contains malware is made when a majority of the antivirus software applications that analyzed the file identified a signature characteristic of malware
23 The method of Claim 1, wherein the determination that the file contains malware is made by calculating a weighted value for the result set generated by the antivirus software applications and determining if the weight value is higher than a predetermined threshold
24 A system for aggregating the knowledge base of antivirus software applications to prevent the execution or spread of malware, the system comprising

(a) a program module capable of satisfying an input or output request,
(b) a kernel mode service application operative to prevent the request from being satisfied when the antivirus software applications detect malware, and
(c) a user mode service application operative to schedule scans between the antivirus software applications

25 The system of Claim 24, further comprising a data-mapping module that provides the antivirus software applications with access to a file associated with the request
26 The system of Claim 25, wherein the data mapping module allows one antivirus software application to access the file at a time
27 The system of Claim 24, wherein the kernel mode service application communicates with the user mode service application to intercept the request and cause the antivirus software applications to analyze the file and determine whether the file contains malware
28 The system of Claim 27, further comprising a scan cache capable of tracking the state of the file analyzed by the antivirus software applications
29 The system of Claim 24, wherein an antivirus software application registers with the user mode service application and defines the requests that will cause the antivirus software application to analyze the file
30 In a computing device that includes a volume and a database that associates file index values with vanables, a computer-implemented method of tracking the state of a file in response to receiving notice that the state of the file was identified, the method comprising
(a) determining if a file index value for the file is contained in the
database,
(b) if a file index value for the file is not contained in the database
(l) obtaining a file index value for the file,
(n) inserting the file index value in the database, and
(c) setting the value of the variable associated with the file index value to
represent the state of the file
31 The method of Claim 30, wherein the variable may represent one of three
states including
(a) infected with malware,
(b) free from a malware infection, and
(c) unknown with regard to being infected with malware

32 The method of Claim 31, further comprising if the state of the file is unknown with regard to being infected with malware causing antivirus software applications to analyze the file and determine if the file contains malware
33 The method of Claim 32, further comprising
(a) if the antivirus software applications determine that the file contains malware, setting the value of the variable associated with the file mdex value in the database to a value representative of being infected with malware, and
(b) conversely, if the antivirus software applications determine that the file does not contain malware, setting the value of the variable associated with the file index value in the database to a value representative of being free from a malware infection
34 The method of Claim 30, wherein obtaining a file index value for the file includes querying a data structure that tracks the attributes of files stored on the volume
35 The method of Claim 30, wherein inserting the file index value in the database includes copying entries m the database to a larger database that is allocated additional memory
36 The method of Claim 35, wherein the additional memory allocated to the larger database is a percentage of the memory allocated to the database
37 The method of Claim 30, wherein the database contains file index values associated with deleted files and wherein a vanable associated with deleted files is changed to a value representative of being free from a malware infection in response to intercepting a command that causes a new file to be created
38 A computer-readable medium bearing computer-executable instructions that, when executed in a computing device that includes a volume and a database that associates file index values with variables, carries out a method of providing the user mode application with access to data in the file, comprising
(a) determining if a file index value for the file is contained in the
database,
(b) if a file index value for the file is not contained in the database
(I) obtaining a file index value for the file,
(n) inserting the file index value m the database, and
(c) setting the value of the variable associated with the file index value to
represent the state of the file
39 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, wherein the variable
may represent one of three states including
(a) infected with malware,
(b) free from a malware infection, and
(c) unknown with regard to being infected with malware

40 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, further comprising if the state of the file is unknown with regard to bemg infected with malware causing antivirus software applications to analyze the file and determine if the file contains malware
41 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 40, further comprising

(a) if the antivirus software applications determine that the file contains malware, setting the value of the variable associated with the file index value in the database to a value representative of being infected with malware, and
(b) conversely, if the antivirus software applications determine that the file does not contain malware, setting the value of the variable associated with the file index value in the database to a value representative of being free from a malware infection

42 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, wherein obtaining a file index value for the file includes querying a data structure that tracks the attributes of files stored on the volume
43 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, wherein inserting the file index value in the database includes copying entries in the database to a larger database that is allocated additional memory
44 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, wherein the additional memory allocated to the larger database is a percentage of the memory allocated to the database
45 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 38, wherein the database contains file index values associated with deleted files and wherein a variable associated with
deleted files is changed to a value representative of being free from a malware infection in response to intercepting a command that causes a new file to be created
46 In a computing device that includes a user mode application, a kernel mode
application, and a file, a computer-implemented method of providing the user mode
application with access to data in the file, the method comprising
(a) creating an interface for the user mode application,
(b) causing the kernel mode application to create a file mapping section object,
(c) providing the interface with information necessary to access the file mapping section object, and
(d) creating a view of the file

47 The method of Claim 46, further comprising transmitting file data to the user mode application in response to a request, wherem the request is made as an application program interface call
48 The method of Claim 47, wherein the user mode application gains access to file data without a data conflict
49 The method of Claim 46, wherein the user mode application is an antivirus software application
50 The method of Claim 49, wherein the interface allows the antivirus software application to create a scanning profile
51 The method of Claim 15, wherein the scanning profile defines mstances when the antivirus software application will read data in the file
52 The method of Claim 50, wherein the scanning profile defines instances when the antivirus software application will disinfect the computing device of a malware infection
53 The method of Claim 49, wherein the antivirus software application compares data in the file to signatures characteristic of malware
54 The method of Claim 46, wherein causing the kernel mode application to create a file mapping section object includes making an application program interface call to an operating system
55 The method of Claim 54, wherein providing the mterface with information necessary to access the file mapping section object includes inserting the section object into the object table associated with the mterface
56 The method of Claim 46, wherein creating a view of the file includes removing the current view in the memory space available to the interface
57 A computer-readable medium bearing computer-executable instructions that, when executed in a computing device that includes a user mode application, a kernel mode application, and a file, carries out a method of providing the user mode application with access to data in the file, comprising

(a) creating an interface for the user mode application,
(b) causing the kernel mode application to create a file mapping section object,
(c) providing the interface with information necessary to access the file mapping section object, and
(d) creating a view of the file

58 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 57, further compnsmg transmitting file data to the user mode application m response to a request wherein the request is made as an application program interface call
59 The computer-readable medium as recited m Claim 58, wherem the user mode application is provided with exclusive access to file data when a request is made
60 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 57, wherein the user mode application is an antivirus software application
61 The computer-readable medium as recited m Claim 60, wherem the interface allows the antivirus software application to create a scanning profile
62 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 61, wherem the scanning profile defines instances when the antivirus software application will read data in the file
63 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 61, wherem the scanning profile defines instances when the antivirus software application will dismfect the computmg device of a malware infection
64 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 60, wherem the antivirus software application compares data in the file to signatures characteristic of malware
65 The computer-readable medium as recited m Claim 57, wherem causing the kernel mode application to create a file mapping section object mcludes making an application program mterface call to an operating system
66 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 65, wherem providing the mterface with mformation necessary to access the file mapping section object mcludes inserting the section object into the object table associated with the mterface
67 The computer-readable medium as recited in Claim 57, wherem creatmg a view of the file mcludes removing a view in the memory space available to the mterface.

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date
Section 15 B P SINGH 2019-05-31
Section 15 B P SINGH 2019-05-31

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-270617.pdf 2017-06-29
1 2304-DEL-2005-GPA-(14-06-2010).pdf 2010-06-14
2 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-Others-(14-06-2010).pdf 2010-06-14
2 2304-DEL-2005-Power of Attorney-270617.pdf 2017-06-29
3 Written submissions and relevant documents [23-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-23
3 2304-DEL-2005-Form-1-(09-12-2010).pdf 2010-12-09
4 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-Others-(09-12-2010).pdf 2010-12-09
4 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-140617.pdf 2017-06-19
5 2304-DEL-2005-Power of Attorney-140617.pdf 2017-06-19
5 2304-del-2005-gpa.pdf 2011-08-21
6 Written submissions and relevant documents [12-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-12
6 2304-del-2005-form-5.pdf 2011-08-21
7 Correspondence to notify the Controller [07-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-07
7 2304-del-2005-form-3.pdf 2011-08-21
8 Form 13 [16-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-16
8 2304-del-2005-form-2.pdf 2011-08-21
9 2304-del-2005-form-18.pdf 2011-08-21
9 Other Document [16-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-16
10 2304-del-2005-form-1.pdf 2011-08-21
10 Other Patent Document [01-11-2016(online)].pdf 2016-11-01
11 2304-del-2005-drawings.pdf 2011-08-21
11 2304-DEL-2005_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
12 2304-del-2005-description (complete).pdf 2011-08-21
12 Abstract-revised-Clean.pdf 2015-07-23
13 2304-del-2005-correspondence-others.pdf 2011-08-21
13 details under sec 8.pdf 2015-07-23
14 2304-del-2005-claims.pdf 2011-08-21
14 FORM 1-cs.pdf 2015-07-23
15 2304-del-2005-assignment.pdf 2011-08-21
15 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Amended claims Clean.pdf 2015-07-23
16 2304-del-2005-abstract.pdf 2011-08-21
16 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Amended claims marked up-DB-21Jul'15.pdf 2015-07-23
17 MTL-GPOA - PRS.pdf 2015-03-13
17 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Response.pdf 2015-07-23
18 Details under section 8.pdf 2015-04-27
18 MS to MTL Assignment.pdf 2015-03-13
19 FORM-6-501-600(PRS).88.pdf 2015-03-13
19 new covering letter.pdf 2015-04-27
20 new covering letter.pdf_31.pdf 2015-04-27
21 FORM-6-501-600(PRS).88.pdf 2015-03-13
21 new covering letter.pdf 2015-04-27
22 Details under section 8.pdf 2015-04-27
22 MS to MTL Assignment.pdf 2015-03-13
23 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Response.pdf 2015-07-23
23 MTL-GPOA - PRS.pdf 2015-03-13
24 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Amended claims marked up-DB-21Jul'15.pdf 2015-07-23
24 2304-del-2005-abstract.pdf 2011-08-21
25 MS-PD000828IN-SC-Amended claims Clean.pdf 2015-07-23
25 2304-del-2005-assignment.pdf 2011-08-21
26 2304-del-2005-claims.pdf 2011-08-21
26 FORM 1-cs.pdf 2015-07-23
27 2304-del-2005-correspondence-others.pdf 2011-08-21
27 details under sec 8.pdf 2015-07-23
28 2304-del-2005-description (complete).pdf 2011-08-21
28 Abstract-revised-Clean.pdf 2015-07-23
29 2304-del-2005-drawings.pdf 2011-08-21
29 2304-DEL-2005_EXAMREPORT.pdf 2016-06-30
30 2304-del-2005-form-1.pdf 2011-08-21
30 Other Patent Document [01-11-2016(online)].pdf 2016-11-01
31 Other Document [16-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-16
31 2304-del-2005-form-18.pdf 2011-08-21
32 Form 13 [16-05-2017(online)].pdf 2017-05-16
32 2304-del-2005-form-2.pdf 2011-08-21
33 Correspondence to notify the Controller [07-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-07
33 2304-del-2005-form-3.pdf 2011-08-21
34 Written submissions and relevant documents [12-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-12
34 2304-del-2005-form-5.pdf 2011-08-21
35 2304-DEL-2005-Power of Attorney-140617.pdf 2017-06-19
35 2304-del-2005-gpa.pdf 2011-08-21
36 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-Others-(09-12-2010).pdf 2010-12-09
36 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-140617.pdf 2017-06-19
37 Written submissions and relevant documents [23-06-2017(online)].pdf 2017-06-23
38 2304-DEL-2005-Power of Attorney-270617.pdf 2017-06-29
39 2304-DEL-2005-Correspondence-270617.pdf 2017-06-29