Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

The Recovery Of Alumina Trihydrate During The Bayer Process Using Scleroglucan

Abstract: The invention provides methods and compositions for improving the production of alumina. The invention involves adding a product containing one or more polysaccharides to liquor within the fluid circuit of the production process, where one of the polysaccharides is scleroglucan. The use of scleroglucan can impart a number of advantages including at least some of: greater flocculation effectiveness, increasing the maximum effective dosage, faster settling rate. The production process can be a Bayer process.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
01 February 2013
Publication Number
27/2013
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
CHEMICAL
Status
Email
kolkatapatent@lsdavar.in
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2018-10-09
Renewal Date

Applicants

NALCO COMPANY
1601 West Diehl Road, Naperville, Illinois 60563-1198, United States of America

Inventors

1. CHESTER Ryan
46 King Edward Drive, Heathridge, Western Australia 6027, Australia
2. KILDEA John D.
8 Loxley Place Baldivis, Western Australia 6171, Australia
3. WANG Jing
2974 Savannah Drive, Aurora, Illinois 60502, U.S.A.
4. BODE Heinrich E.
1130 Hull Court Aurora, Illinois 60504, U.S.A.
5. LI Xiaojin Harry
1043 S. Plum Tree Lane, Palatine, Illinois 60067, U.S.A.

Specification

THE RECOVERY OF ALUMINA TRIHYDRATE DURING THE BAYER
PROCESS USING SCLEROGLUCAN
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
None.
Statement Regarding Federally Sponsored Research or Development
Not Applicable.
Background of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for improving the Bayer process for the
production of alumina from bauxite ore. The invention concerns the use of scleroglucan to
improve the performance of unit operations within the Bayer process, specifically to enhance the
settling of fine alumina trihydrate crystals.
In the typical Bayer process for the production of alumina trihydrate, bauxite ore is
pulverized, slurried with caustic solution, and then digested at elevated temperatures and
pressures. The caustic solution dissolves oxides of aluminum, forming an aqueous sodium
aluminate solution. The caustic-insoluble constituents of bauxite ore are then separated from the
aqueous phase containing the dissolved sodium aluminate. Solid alumina trihydrate product is
precipitated out of the solution and collected as product.
As described at least in part, among other places, in US Patent 6,814,873, the
Bayer process is constantly evolving and the specific techniques employed in industry for the
various steps of the process not only vary from plant to plant, but also are often held as trade
secrets. As a more detailed, but not comprehensive, example of a Bayer process, the pulverized
bauxite ore may be fed to a slurry mixer where aqueous slurry is prepared. The slurry makeup
solution is typically spent liquor (described below) and added caustic solution. This bauxite ore
slurry is then passed through a digester or a series of digesters where the available alumina is
released from the ore as caustic-soluble sodium aluminate. The digested slurry is then cooled, for
instance to about 220° F, employing a series of flash tanks wherein heat and condensate are
recovered. The aluminate liquor leaving the flashing operation contains insoluble solids, which
solids consist of the insoluble residue that remains after, or are precipitated during, digestion. The
coarser solid particles may be removed from the aluminate liquor with a "sand trap", cyclone or
other means. The finer solid particles may be separated from the liquor first by settling and then
by filtration, if necessary.
The clarified sodium aluminate liquor is then further cooled and seeded with
alumina trihydrate crystals to induce precipitation of alumina in the form of alumina trihydrate,
Al(OH)3. The alumina trihydrate particles or crystals are then classified into various size fractions
and separated from the caustic liquor. The remaining liquid phase, the spent liquor, is returned to
the initial digestion step and employed as a digestant after reconstitution with caustic.
Within the overall process one of the key steps is that of precipitation of the
alumina trihydrate from the clarified sodium aluminate liquor. After the insoluble solids are
removed to give the clarified sodium aluminate liquor, also referred to as "green liquor", it is
generally charged to a suitable precipitation tank, or series of precipitation tanks, and seeded with
recirculated fine alumina trihydrate crystals. In the precipitation tank(s) it is cooled under
agitation to induce the precipitation of alumina f om solution as alumina trihydrate. The fine
particle alumina trihydrate acts as seed crystals which provide nucleation sites and agglomerate
together and grow as part of this precipitation process.
Alumina trihydrate crystal formation (the nucleation, agglomeration and growth of
alumina trihydrate crystals), and the precipitation and collection thereof, are critical steps in the
economic recovery of aluminum values by the Bayer process. Bayer process operators strive to
optimize their crystal formation and precipitation methods so as to produce the greatest possible
product yield from the Bayer process while producing crystals of a given particle size
distribution. A relatively large particle size is beneficial to subsequent processing steps required
to recover aluminum metal. Undersized alumina trihydrate crystals, or fines, generally are not
used in the production of aluminum metal, but instead are recycled for use as fine particle
alumina trihydrate crystal seed. As a consequence, the particle size of the precipitated trihydrate
crystals determines whether the material is to be ultimately utilized as product (larger crystals) of
as seed (smaller crystals). The classification and capture of the different sized trihydrate particles
is therefore an important step in the Bayer process.
This separation or recovery of alumina trihydrate crystals as product in the Bayer
process, or for use as precipitation seed, is generally achieved by settling, cyclones, filtration
and/or a combination of these techniques. Coarse particles settle easily, but fine particles settle
slowly. Typically, plants will use two or three steps of settling in order to classify the trihydrate
particles into different size distributions corresponding to product and seed. In particular, in the
final step of classification a settling vessel is often used to capture and settle the fine seed
particles. Within the settling steps of the classification system, flocculants can be used to
enhance particle capture and settling rate.
The overflow of the last classification stage is returned to the process as spent
liquor. This spent liquor will go through heat exchangers and evaporation and eventually be used
back in digestion. As a result, any trihydrate particles reporting to the overflow in this final
settling stage will not be utilized within the process for either seed or product. Effectively such
material is recirculated within the process, creating inefficiencies. Therefore, it is important to
achieve the lowest possible concentration of solids in the overflow of the last stage of
classification to maximize the efficiency of the process.
As described for example in US Patent 5,041,269, conventional technology
employs the addition of synthetic water soluble polyacrylate flocculants and/or dextran
flocculants to improve the settling characteristics of the alumina trihydrate particles in the
classification process and reduce the amount of solids in the spent liquor. While various
flocculants are often used in the trihydrate classification systems of Bayer plants, it is highly
desirable to reduce as far as possible, the loss of solids with the spent liquor.
Thus there is clear need and utility for a method of improving the classification
and flocculation of precipitated alumina trihydrate in the Bayer process. Such improvements
would enhance the efficiency of the production of alumina from bauxite ore.
The art described in this section is not intended to constitute an admission that any
patent, publication or other information referred to herein is "prior art" with respect to this
invention, unless specifically designated as such. In addition, this section should not be construed
to mean that a search has been made or that no other pertinent information as defined in 37 CFR
§ 1.56(a) exists.
Brief Summary of the Invention
At least one embodiment of the invention is directed towards a method for settling
alumina trihydrate in the Bayer process. The process comprises adding to the system an effective
amount of scleroglucan. The use of such a scleroglucan results in improved settling of alumina
trihydrate when compared to the use of conventional flocculants employed in this process.
At least one embodiment of the invention is directed towards a method for
producing alumina comprising the addition of a composition containing one or more
polysaccharides, one of which is scleroglucan to liquor of a Bayer process fluid stream. The
composition may be added to said liquor in a trihydrate classification circuit of said alumina
production process. The composition may be added to said liquor at one or more locations in
said process where solid-liquid separation occurs. The addition locations may facilitate inhibiting
the rate of nucleation of one or more alumina trihydrate crystals in said process. The addition
location may facilitate reducing the rate of scale formation in said process. The composition may
improve the yield of alumina trihydrate sequestration.
At least one embodiment of the invention is directed towards a composition
comprising scleroglucan and Bayer liquor.
Detailed Description of the Invention
For purposes of this application the definition of these terms is as follows:
"Scleroglucan" is a polysaccharide consisting of beta-1,3-D-glucose residues with
one beta-1,6-D-glucose side chain every three main residues
"Liquor" or "Bayer liquor" is liquid medium that has run through a Bayer process
in an industrial facility.
In the event that the above definitions or a description stated elsewhere in this
application is inconsistent with a meaning (explicit or implicit) which is commonly used, in a
dictionary, or stated in a source incorporated by reference into this application, the application
and the claim terms in particular are understood to be construed according to the definition or
description in this application, and not according to the common definition, dictionary definition,
or the definition that was incorporated by reference. In light of the above, in the event that a term
can only be understood if it is construed by a dictionary, if the term is defined by the Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5th Edition, (2005), (Published by Wiley, John & Sons,
Inc.) this definition shall control how the term is to be defined in the claims.
In at least one embodiment, a process for extracting alumina trihydrate comprises
the digestion of pretreated bauxite ore in an alkaline liquor to produce a slurry of red mud solids
and aluminate in suspension in the alkaline liquor then decanting the red mud solids from the
alkaline liquor suspension to produce the decanting liquor; the passing of said decanting liquor
through security filtration to remove all solids, precipitation and production of a slurry containing
alumina trihydrate solids which then are flocculated and settled with the addition of a
polysaccharide. Larger trihydrate particles are put through the calcination process to produce
purified alumina while finer particles are re-used as seed for the precipitation process.
In at least one embodiment the preferred flocculant of the trihydrate solids in the
process is scleroglucan or a blend of scleroglucan with one or more other polysaccharides such as
dextran. The flocculant is added in the range of 0.1 to 100 ppm. The most preferred dose range
for the flocculant is 0.1to 10 ppm.
As described at least in US Patents 6,726,845, 3,085,853, 5,008,089, 5,041,269,
5,091,159, 5,106,599, 5,346,628 and 5,716,530 and Australian Patents 5310690 and 737191,
polysaccharides such as dextran have previously been used in the Bayer Process. However, use
of scleroglucan results in superior and unexpected improvements in the activity when compared
to conventional polysaccharides or other reagents.
In at least one embodiment the composition is added to liquor in a trihydrate
classification circuit of said alumina trihydrate production process. The composition can be
added to said liquor at one or more locations in a Bayer process where solid-liquid separation
occurs.
In at least one embodiment the composition can be added to said liquor at one or
more locations in a Bayer process where it inhibits the rate of nucleation of one or more alumina
hydrate crystals in said process.
In at least one embodiment the composition can be added to said liquor at one or
more locations in a Bayer process where it reduces the rate of scale formation in said process.
In at least one embodiment the composition can be added to said liquor at one or
more locations in a Bayer process where it facilitates red mud clarification in the process.
In at least one embodiment the composition can be added in combination
with or according to any of the compositions and methods disclosed in commonly owned
and at least partially co-invented co-pending patent application having an attorney docket
number of 8326 and a title of "THE RECOVERY OF ALUMINA TRIHYDRATE
DURING THE BAYER PROCESS USING CROSS-LINKED POLYSACCHARIDES."
EXAMPLES
The foregoing may be better understood by reference to the following
examples, which are presented for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit
the scope of the invention.
Within the examples given below a range of solutions containing
scleroglucan and dextran in various ratios were used. The performance of these blends
was compared to the performance of scleroglucan and/or dextran when used alone. The
compositions of the combined formulations tested are given in table 1. When doses of
such blends are quoted, this refers to the combined amount of scleroglucan plus dextran
added to the process.
Table 1. Ratio of components in blended formulations used within the examples
Example 1.
Secondary thickener (ST) overflow from an operating Bayer plant was collected
just prior to the test, divided into 1L aliquots in clear 1L measuring cylinders and placed in a
waterbath at 75°C. Each cylinder contained approximately 83 g/L of alumina trihydrate. The
products tested were added as dilute solutions one after another to the surface of the slurry and
mixed well using a gang plunger. The settling rate was measured by recording the time taken for
the solids interface to reach the 600 mL mark of the cylinder from when the mixing ceased. The
result of the settling rate is converted to meters per hour (m/hr) in Table 2.
Table 2. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 1.
The data in table 2 indicate that a significantly faster settling rate can be achieved
with scleroglucan as the flocculant compared to an equivalent dose of dextran.
Example 2:
The same method as that used in example 1 was employed. The only difference
was the solids content of this slurry collected was 45 g/L. After settling the samples were left to
settle for 15 minutes followed by removal of 50 mL of slurry from the surface of the slurry using
a syringe. This aliquot was filtered through a pre-weighed Supor®-450 membrane filter paper.
Solids were then washed with hot deionized water and dried at 100°C. The filter paper and solids
were then reweighed and the mass of solids calculated. This mass is listed as "overflow solids
(g/L)" in Table 3. The results are displayed in Table 3 and again show the increase in settling rate
when scleroglucan is used or included in combination with dextran in a formulation.
Additionally, superior (lower) overflow solids are observed when scleroglucan or formulations
containing scleroglucan
Table 3. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 2 .
Example 3:
The same method as in example 2 was used. The solids content of the slurry
collected for this test was 67 g/L.
Table 4. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 3.
Example 4.
The same method as in example 2 was used. Two separate sets of data were
collected in two experimental runs. The solids content of the slurry for the individual runs in this
example was 79 g/L in both cases. The top 50 mL of the slurry was sampled after minutes of
settling instead of 15 minutes as in example 2.
Table 5. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 4 run 1
Table 6. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 4 run 2
Example 5:
Bayer plant spent liquor (200 mL) and air dried plant seed (16 g) was combined in
a bottle and heated to 65°C in a rotating water bath. Once the slurry had reached equilibrium it
was transferred to a 250 mL measuring cylinder that was suspended in a water bath at 65°C. The
slurry was then dosed with product, mixed thoroughly and allowed to settle for three minutes
followed by removal of 50 mL of slurry from the surface of the slurry using a syringe. This
aliquot was filtered through a pre-weighed Supor®-450 membrane filter paper. Solids were then
washed with hot deionized water and dried at 100°C. The filter paper and solids were then
reweighed and the mass of solids calculated. This mass is listed as "overflow solids (g/L)" in
Table 7.
Table 7. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example .
Example 6.
The same method as in example 5 was used in this example except that 500 ml of
liquor and 40 g of seed was used for each treatment. The sampling of the slurry was conducted
after 5 minutes of settling time. The settling rate was measured by the time taken for the solid
interface to reach the 350 mL graduation on the cylinder once mixing had ceased.
Table S. Alumina trihydrate settling results of Example 6.
Example 7
The same method as in example 6 was used except the solids content of the slurry
in this example was increased to 120 g/L.
Table 9. Alumina trihydrate settling results for Example 7.
Example 8.
Plant spent liquor ( 1 L) and air dried plant seed (80 g) was combined in a bottle
and heated to 65°C in a rotating water bath. Once equilibrium was established the slurry was
dosed with flocculant (as appropriate) mixed well and poured into a 1 L Imhoff cone. The slurry
was allowed to settle in the cone for twenty minutes before allowing the slurry to discharge
through the bottom hole. The discharge time was measured from when the plug was removed
after the twenty minutes of settling to when all the contents of the cone had been discharged.
Table 10. Example 8 discharge times for settled alumina trihydrate slurries using Imhoff cones.
Example 9.
The same method as in example 8 was used but the slurry in this example was
plant secondary classification overflow slurry collected from the plant just prior to the test. The
solids content of this slurry was 62 g/L.
Table 11. Example 9 discharge times for settled alumina trihydrate slurries using Imhoff cones.
Example 10.
The same method as in example 9 was used in this example. The solids content of
this slurry was 100 g/L.
Table 12. Example 10 discharge times for settled alumina trihydrate slurries using Imhoff cones.
Treatment Dose (ppm) Imhoff Cone
discharge time (seconds)
Untreated 0 127
Dextran 0.7 114
(I) 0.8 112
The results from examples 8, 9 and 10 indicate that scleroglucan has an
unexpected impact on the flow of settled alumina trihydrate solids.
When applied at the same dose rates as dextran, scleroglucan provides a faster
settling rate, more desirable rheological properties in the settled bed and maintains similar or
better performance in overflow clarity. The use of scleroglucan is effective when applied either
alone, or as a blend with other polysaccharides such as dextran.
While this invention may be embodied in many different forms, there are
shown in the drawings and described in detail herein specific preferred embodiments of
the invention. The present disclosure is an exemplification of the background and
principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the particular
embodiments illustrated. All patents, patent applications, scientific papers, and any other
referenced materials mentioned anywhere herein, are incorporated by reference in their
entirety. Furthermore, the invention encompasses any possible combination of some or
all of the various embodiments described herein and incorporated herein.
The above disclosure is intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. This
description will suggest many variations and alternatives to one of ordinary skill in this art. All
these alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims where
the term "comprising" means "including, but not limited to". Those familiar with the art may
recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein which equivalents are
also intended to be encompassed by the claims.
All ranges and parameters disclosed herein are understood to encompass any and
all subranges subsumed therein, and every number between the endpoints. For example, a stated
range of " 1 to 10" should be considered to include any and all subranges between (and inclusive
of) the minimum value of 1 and the maximum value of 10; that is, all subranges beginning with a
minimum value of 1 or more, (e.g. 1 to 6.1), and ending with a maximum value of 10 or less,
(e.g. 2.3 to 9.4, 3 to 8, 4 to 7), and finally to each number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 contained
within the range.
This completes the description of the preferred and alternate embodiments of the
invention. Those skilled in the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiment
described herein which equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto.
Claims
1. A method of producing alumina comprising the addition of a composition containing one
or more polysaccharides, one of which is scleroglucan to liquor of a Bayer process fluid stream.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition is added to said liquor in a trihydrate
classification circuit of said alumina production process.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition is added to said liquor at one or more
locations in said process where solid-liquid separation occurs.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition is added to said liquor at one or more
locations and thereby inhibits the rate of nucleation of one or more alumina trihydrate crystals in
said process.
5. The method of claim 1wherein the composition is added to said liquor at one or more
locations and thereby reduces the rate of scale formation in said process.
6. The method of claim 1wherein the composition addition improves the yield of alumina
trihydrate sequestration from an alumina trihydrate process by adding the composition of claim 1
to said liquor of said process.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprising the addition of at least one cross-linked
polysaccharide.
8. A composition comprising: scleroglucan and Bayer liquor.

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-PCT SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf 2013-02-01
1 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [03-10-2023(online)].pdf 2023-10-03
2 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-02-01
2 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [24-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-24
3 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [28-07-2021(online)].pdf 2021-07-28
3 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-02-01
4 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [27-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-27
4 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-2.pdf 2013-02-01
5 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [17-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-17
5 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-02-01
6 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [26-03-2019(online)].pdf 2019-03-26
6 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-02-01
7 289-KOLNP-2013.pdf 2013-02-08
7 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [25-03-2019(online)].pdf 2019-03-25
8 289-KOLNP-2013-IntimationOfGrant09-10-2018.pdf 2018-10-09
8 289-KOLNP-2013-(08-03-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-03-08
9 289-KOLNP-2013-(08-03-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-03-08
9 289-KOLNP-2013-PatentCertificate09-10-2018.pdf 2018-10-09
10 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-FORM-13.pdf 2014-06-16
10 289-KOLNP-2013-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [10-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-10
11 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2014-06-16
11 289-KOLNP-2013-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [10-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-10
12 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-CLAIMS.pdf 2014-06-16
12 289-KOLNP-2013-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2018-08-06
13 289-KOLNP-2013-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [18-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-18
13 Other Patent Document [02-06-2016(online)].pdf 2016-06-02
14 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [18-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-18
14 Other Patent Document [01-08-2016(online)].pdf 2016-08-01
15 289-KOLNP-2013-CLAIMS [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
15 289-KOLNP-2013-FER.pdf 2018-01-02
16 289-KOLNP-2013-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
16 289-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
17 289-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [11-06-2018(online)]-1.pdf 2018-06-11
17 289-KOLNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
18 289-KOLNP-2013-FER_SER_REPLY [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
18 289-KOLNP-2013-OTHERS [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
19 289-KOLNP-2013-FER_SER_REPLY [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
19 289-KOLNP-2013-OTHERS [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
20 289-KOLNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
20 289-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [11-06-2018(online)]-1.pdf 2018-06-11
21 289-KOLNP-2013-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
21 289-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
22 289-KOLNP-2013-CLAIMS [11-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-11
22 289-KOLNP-2013-FER.pdf 2018-01-02
23 Other Patent Document [01-08-2016(online)].pdf 2016-08-01
23 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [18-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-18
24 289-KOLNP-2013-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [18-06-2018(online)].pdf 2018-06-18
24 Other Patent Document [02-06-2016(online)].pdf 2016-06-02
25 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-CLAIMS.pdf 2014-06-16
25 289-KOLNP-2013-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2018-08-06
26 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2014-06-16
26 289-KOLNP-2013-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [10-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-10
27 289-KOLNP-2013-(16-06-2014)-FORM-13.pdf 2014-06-16
27 289-KOLNP-2013-Changing Name-Nationality-Address For Service [10-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-10
28 289-KOLNP-2013-(08-03-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-03-08
28 289-KOLNP-2013-PatentCertificate09-10-2018.pdf 2018-10-09
29 289-KOLNP-2013-(08-03-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-03-08
29 289-KOLNP-2013-IntimationOfGrant09-10-2018.pdf 2018-10-09
30 289-KOLNP-2013.pdf 2013-02-08
30 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [25-03-2019(online)].pdf 2019-03-25
31 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [26-03-2019(online)].pdf 2019-03-26
31 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-02-01
32 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [17-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-17
32 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-1.pdf 2013-02-01
33 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [27-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-27
33 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-2.pdf 2013-02-01
34 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [28-07-2021(online)].pdf 2021-07-28
34 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-3.pdf 2013-02-01
35 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [24-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-24
35 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-FORM-5.pdf 2013-02-01
36 289-KOLNP-2013-(01-02-2013)-PCT SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf 2013-02-01
36 289-KOLNP-2013-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [03-10-2023(online)].pdf 2023-10-03

Search Strategy

1 289KOLNP2013Searchstrategy_02-01-2018.pdf
1 DocumentuploadedduringFER_02-01-2018.pdf
2 289KOLNP2013Searchstrategy_02-01-2018.pdf
2 DocumentuploadedduringFER_02-01-2018.pdf

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2013 - To 03/08/2014

4th: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2014 - To 03/08/2015

5th: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2015 - To 03/08/2016

6th: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2016 - To 03/08/2017

7th: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2017 - To 03/08/2018

8th: 21 Nov 2018

From 03/08/2018 - To 03/08/2019

9th: 13 Jun 2019

From 03/08/2019 - To 03/08/2020

10th: 18 Jun 2020

From 03/08/2020 - To 03/08/2021

11th: 09 Jun 2021

From 03/08/2021 - To 03/08/2022

12th: 23 Jun 2022

From 03/08/2022 - To 03/08/2023

13th: 19 Jun 2023

From 03/08/2023 - To 03/08/2024

14th: 25 Jun 2024

From 03/08/2024 - To 03/08/2025

15th: 17 Jun 2025

From 03/08/2025 - To 03/08/2026