Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Use Of Alpha Amino Ethers For The Removal Of Hydrogen Sulfide From Hydrocarbons

Abstract: The invention provides a method of removing hydrogen sulfide from hydrocarbon fluids. The method involves using an alpha-amino ether as a hydrogen sulfide scavenger. This allows for the introduction of an oil soluble scavenger in lieu of water-soluble scavengers.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
14 January 2013
Publication Number
27/2013
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
CHEMICAL
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

NALCO COMPANY
1601 W. Diehl Road, Naperville, Illinois 60563-1198, United States of America

Inventors

1. COMPTON, Dennis R.
739 Rolling Mill Drive, Sugar Land, Texas 77498, United States of America
2. STRICKLAND Byron J.
4500 Holt Street Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States of America
3. GARCIA, Juan, M. III
2015 Cypress Run Drive Sugar Land, Texas 77478, United States of America

Specification

USE OF ALPHA-AMINO ETHERS FOR THE REMOVAL OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE
FROM HYDROCARBONS
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
None.
Statement Regarding Federally Sponsored Research or Development
Not Applicable.
Background of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the treatment of sour gas and liquid
hydrocarbon to remove or reduce the levels of hydrogen sulfide therein. The toxicity of hydrogen
sulfide in hydrocarbon fluids is well known in the industry. This has caused considerable
expense and efforts to be expended annually to reduce its content to a safe level.
In large production facilities, it s generally more economical to install a
regenerative system for treating sour gas streams. These systems typically employ a compound
used in an absorption tower to contact the produced fluids and selectively absorb the hydrogen
sulfide and possibly other toxic materials such as carbon dioxide and mercaptans. The absorption
compound is then regenerated and reused in the system. Typical hydrogen sulfide absorption
materials include alkanolamines, PEG, hindered amines, and other species that can be
regenerated.
Nonregenerative scavengers for small plant hydrogen sulfide removal fa l into four
general categories: 1) aldehyde based, 2) metallic oxide based, 3) caustic based, and 4) other
processes. In the removal of hydrogen sulfide by nonregenerative compounds, the scavenger
reacts with the hydrogen sulfide to form a nonlethal compound or a compound, which can be
removed from the hydrocarbon. For example, when formaldehyde reacts with hydrogen sulfide a
chemical compound known as formthionals (e.g., trithiane) is formed.
Prior Art aldehyde scavengers typically include low molecular weight aldehydes
and ketones and adducts thereof. The low molecular weight aldehydes may also be combined
with an alkyl or alkanolamine as disclosed in US Patent 4,748,01 1. Other aldehyde derived
scavengers include the reaction product of low molecular weight alkanolamines and aldehydes as
disclosed in US Patent 4,978,5 12. PCT Application WO 92/0148 1 discloses a method of
reducing sulfides in different applications using certain tri-substituted-hexahydro-s-triazines.
German reference DE4027300 discloses a regenerative solvent for removing ¾ S and
mercaptans. US Patent 5,347,004 discloses the use of 1,3,5 alkoxyalkylene hexahydro triazines.
PCT Application WO 9 1 US 5232 discloses hydroxyalkyl triazine scavengers, specifically an
N,N',N"-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)hexahydro-s-triazine. US Patent 5,774,024 discloses the
combination of an alkyl triazine scavenger and quaternary ammonium salt, where the quaternary
ammonium salt enhances the effectiveness of the alkyl-triazine.. These prior art attempts
however are frequently water-based chemicals and require significant mixing to allow the
scavenger to effectively contact the hydrocarbon fluid and remove the hydrogen sulfide.
Thus there is clear need and utility for an improved method of scavenging
hydrogen sulfide from hydrocarbon fluids using scavengers that are soluble in the fluid that is
being treated. The art described in this section is not intended to constitute an admission that any
patent, publication or other information referred to herein is "prior art" with respect to this
invention, unless specifically designated as such. In addition, this section should not be construed
to mean that a search has been made or that no other pertinent information as defined in 37 CFR
§ 1.56(a) exists.
Brief Summary of the Invention
At least one embodiment of the invention is directed towards a method for
removing hydrogen sulfide from a hydrocarbon fluid. The method comprises contacting the fluid
with an effective amount of a composition comprising a hydrogen sulfide scavenger. The amount
of hydrogen sulfide scavenger is sufficient to react with the hydrogen sulfide to reduce the
amount hydrogen sulfide released into the vapor space . The reaction product of the hydrogen
sulfide scavenger and the hydrogen sulfide remain soluble in the hydrocarbon fluid. The
hydrogen sulfide scavenger contains at least one alpha-amino ether.
The composition may include one item selected from the list consisting of:
N,N' -oxybis(methylene)bis(N,N-dibutylamine)
N,N'-(methylenebis(oxy)bis(methyIene))bis(N,N-dibutylamine),
and any combination thereof.
The reaction product of the sulfide scavenging formulation and the hydrogen
sulfide may not form a separate fluid layer. The method may also further comprise the step of
reacting a secondary amine with a formaldehyde equivalent to form at least some of the
scavenging formulation. The hydrocarbon fluid may be a liquid.
Detailed Description of the Invention
For purposes of this application the definition of these terms is as follows:
"Alpha-amino ether" means a molecule according to the formula:
Where: Rl R2, R3, , are carbon containing side chains containing 1- 20 carbon atoms and
includes cyclic and acyclic compounds. The cyclic compounds can be aromatic or non-aromatic.
Examples include but are not limited to, methyl, ethyl, propyl, tert-butyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl,
morpholino, and phenyl, and they all can be the same group or one or more different groups. B is
an ether group, which is either an oxygen atom or a group having an oxygen atom at both ends
(such as -OCH 0 - or - OC O-).
"Formaldehyde equivalent" means a composition of matter containing at least one
group according to the formula: ( ¾0) in which n is an integer greater than or equal to 1,
and/or a composition of matter including formaldehyde or related molecules such as
paraformaldehyde, and/or s-trioxane.
"Hydrocarbon fluid" means a liquid or gas predominantly comprising organic
material including but not limited to kerosene, crude oil, crude oil emulsions, oilfield condensate,
petroleum residua, refined fuels, distillate fuels, fuel oil, heating oils, diesel fuel, gasoline, jet
fuel, bunker fuel oils, and any combination thereof.
"Non-Regenerative Scavenger" means a scavenger, which is consumed by the
process of scavenging.
"Regenerative Scavenger" means a scavenger, which is not consumed by the
process of scavenging.
"Scavenger" means a composition of matter, such as but not limited to alphaamino
ethers, useful in reducing the amount of or mitigating the effects of some other
composition of matter, such as but not limited to hydrogen sulfide, in a fluid medium.
In the event that the above definitions or a description stated elsewhere in this
application is inconsistent with a meaning (explicit or implicit) which is commonly used, in a
dictionary, or stated in a source incorporated by reference into this application, the application
and the claim terms in particular are understood to be construed according to the definition or
description in this application, and not according to the common definition, dictionary definition,
or the definition that was incorporated by reference. In light of the above, in the event that a term
can only be understood if it is construed by a dictionary, if the term is defined by the Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5th Edition, (2005), (Published by Wiley, John & Sons,
Inc.) this definition shall control how the term is to be defined in the claims.
In at least one embodiment, the hydrogen sulfide in a hydrocarbon fluid is reduced
by the introduction of an alpha-amino ether scavenger into the fluid.
In at least one embodiment the alpha-amino ether is a portion of a scavenging
formulation is used in a hydrocarbon fluid. The formulation comprises alpha-amino ether and
can consist of a carrier liquid as well. The formulation can be introduced into the hydrocarbon
fluid by mechanical means including but not limited to injection pumps or any mechanism
disclosed in US Patents 5,744,024 and 5,840,177. In the context of gaseous hydrocarbon fluids,
the gas may be passed through an absorption tower containing a scavenging formulation.
One advantage of the use of the alpha-amino ether scavenger over other
scavengers is that the alpha-amino ether scavenger is soluble in hydrocarbon fluids, since it is not
a water-based product.
As illustrated in FIG. 1, in at least one embodiment the hydrogen sulfide
scavenger is produced by reacting a secondary amine with formaldehyde or other formaldehyde
equivalents such as paraformaldehyde or s-trioxane. This produces a composition of matter that
predominantly comprises two forms of alpha-amino ethers (compounds B and C). 10%-25% of
the composition is a mono oxygen ether (compound B) and 50%-80% of the composition is a bis
oxygen ether with a single carbon atom between the ether oxygens (compound C). The reaction
product also comprises 10-25% of the non-ether diamine (compound A). Compound A is an
unavoidable side product of the reaction mixture. The reaction can be performed by mixing the
reactants in solvents such as but not limited to Naphtha (Petroleum) Heavy Aromatic Solvents
(such as Aromatic 150 and Solvesso by ExxonMobil) or Naphtha Light Aromatic Solvents (such
as (Aromatic 100 by Americhem Sales Corporation).
In at least one embodiment the ratio of amine to formaldehyde in the reaction
mixture is inclusively within the range of 1.5:1 to 1:1.5 and is preferably between 1.2:1 and 1:1.2.
In at least one embodiment any of the R and R' groups correspond to any of the
Ri, R , R , and R4, groups described in the definition of "alpha-amino ether".
In at least one embodiment when R is n-butyl and R' is H then:
Compound A is N N,N' ,N'-tetrabutylmethanediamine,
Compound B is N,N'-oxybis(methylene)bis(N,N-dibutylene), and
Compound C is N N'-(methylenebis(oxy)bis(methylene))bis(N,N'-dibutylamine).
At least some contemplated scavenging compositions include formulations
comprising:
(Compound A, B, and C), (A and B), (A and C), (B and C), (C alone), and (B alone).
EXAMPLES
The foregoing may be better understood by reference to the following
example, which is presented for purposes of illustration and is not intended to limit the
scope of the invention.
Samples of hydrocarbon fluids were tested to determine the efficiency of
the scavenger. Table 1 compares the inventive composition in naphtha at 22 degrees C,
Table 2 kerosene at 22 degrees C, and Table 3 slurry oil (such as carbon black oil, decant
oil, and clarified slurry oil produced in a refinery) at 97 degrees C. The samples
contained variable levels of hydrogen sulfide and were comparatively treated with various
dosages of alpha-amino ether scavenger or left untreated, and the amounts H S reduced in
each sample was recorded.
!
Table 1: Naphtha 22 'C
H2S
ppm 2S Percent Dose
Treatment p ) Reduced Reduction Ratio Time
Untreated 800
Compounds A- C 20 780 97.5 0.2 2 h
Compounds A- C 6 794 99.2 0.3 2 h
Compounds A- C 3 797 99.6 0.2 24 h
Compounds A- C <1 >799 99.9 0.3 24h
ί
Compounds A- C 12 (4) 788 (796) 98.5 (99.5) 0.2 (24h)
: te s 22 °C
ppm H2S Percent Dose
Treatment (ppm) Reduced Reduction Ratio Time
Untreated 1400
Compounds A - C 400 1000 71 0.1 2 h
Compounds A - C 220 1180 84 0.2 2 h
Compounds A - C 95 1305 93 0.3 2 h
Table 3: Slurry oil 97 C
H2S
ppm H2S Percent Dose
Treatment ( pm) Reduced Reduction Ratio Time
Untreated 1300
Compounds A - C 450 850 65 0.1 2.5 h
Compounds A - C 240 1060 82 0.2 2.5 h
Compounds A - C 180 1120 86 0.3 2.5 h
Compounds A - C 140 1160 89 0.4 2.5 h
Compounds A - C 90 1210 93 0.5 2 5 h
The amount of H S present in the vapor space was determined by
measuring the vapor space hydrogen sulfide levels according to ASTM D5705-03.
test procedure was modified by running at temperatures other than 60°C. A one-gallon
sample was divided into multiple 500 milliliter samples for testing. The treated containers
were pre-dosed with Compounds A-C and then the fluid being tested was poured into the
container.
In each example, the dose ratio was the number used to determine the ppm
treat rate for the sample. For table 1 the untreated sample resulted in a vapor space
hydrogen sulfide measurement of 800 ppm. A dose ratio of 0.2 indicates the sample was
treated with 160 ppm of additive. A dose ratio of 0.3 indicates that the sample was
treated with 240 ppm of additive.
This data demonstrates that the presence of the alpha-amino ether
scavenger reduced the H S in the hydrocarbon fluids in a relatively short amount of time
and continued to reduce the H2S the longer the sample was exposed to the alpha-amino
ether prior to testing.
While this invention may be embodied in many different forms, there are
shown in the drawings and described in detail herein specific preferred embodiments of
the invention. The present disclosure is an exemplification of the principles of the
invention and is not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiments
illustrated. All patents, patent applications, scientific papers, and any other referenced
materials mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Furthermore,
the invention encompasses any possible combination of some or all of the various
embodiments described herein and incorporated herein.
The above disclosure is intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. This
description will suggest many variations and alternatives to one of ordinary skill in this art. All
these alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims where
the term "comprising" means "including, but not limited to". Those familiar with the art may
recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein which equivalents are
also intended to be encompassed by the claims.
All ranges and parameters disclosed herein are understood to encompass any and
all subranges subsumed therein, and every number between the endpoints. For example, a stated
range of " 1 to 10" should be considered to include any and all subranges between (and inclusive
of) the minimum value of 1 and the maximum value of 10; that is, all subranges beginning with a
minimum value of 1 or more, (e.g. 1to 6.1), and ending with a maximum value of 10 or less,
(e.g. 2.3 to 9.4, 3 to 8, 4 to 7), and finally to each number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 contained
within the range.
This completes the description of the preferred and alternate embodiments of the
invention. Those skilled in the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiment
described herein which equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto.
Claims
1. A method of reducing the amount of hydrogen sulfide in a hydrocarbon fluid by
contacting that fluid with an effective amount of a composition comprising a hydrogen sulfide
scavenger, wherein the amount of hydrogen sulfide scavenger is sufficient to react with the
hydrogen sulfide to reduce the hydrogen sulfide found in the vapor phase., the reaction product of
the hydrogen sulfide scavenger and the hydrogen sulfide remain soluble in the hydrocarbon fluid,
the hydrogen sulfide scavenger contains at least one alpha-amino ether.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the composition includes one item selected from the list
consisting of:
N,N'-oxybis(methylene)bis(N,N-dibutylamine),
N,N'-(methylenebis(oxy)bis(methyIene))bis(N,N-dibutylamine),
and any combination thereof that may include N,N, 'N'-tetrabutylmethanediamine.
3. The method of claim 1 in which the reaction product of the sulfide scavenging
formulation and the hydrogen sulfide do not form a separate fluid layer.
4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of reacting a secondary amine with a
formaldehyde equivalent to form at least some of the scavenging formulation.

Documents

Orders

Section Controller Decision Date

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)PCT SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf 2013-01-14
1 122-KOLNP-2013-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [27-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-27
2 122-KOLNP-2013-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2018-07-13
2 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION.pdf 2013-01-14
3 122-KOLNP-2013-CLAIMS [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
3 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-5.pdf 2013-01-14
4 122-KOLNP-2013-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
4 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-3.pdf 2013-01-14
5 122-KOLNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
5 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-2.pdf 2013-01-14
6 122-KOLNP-2013-FER_SER_REPLY [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
6 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-1.pdf 2013-01-14
7 122-KOLNP-2013-OTHERS [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
7 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-01-14
8 122-KOLNP-2013.pdf 2013-01-18
8 122-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
9 122-KOLNP-2013-FER.pdf 2017-12-21
9 122-KOLNP-2013-(28-02-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-02-28
10 122-KOLNP-2013-(28-02-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-02-28
10 122-KOLNP-2013-FORM-18.pdf 2014-10-13
11 122-KOLNP-2013-(22-04-2013)-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2013-04-22
11 122-KOLNP-2013-(22-04-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-04-22
12 122-KOLNP-2013-(22-04-2013)-ASSIGNMENT.pdf 2013-04-22
12 122-KOLNP-2013-(22-04-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-04-22
13 122-KOLNP-2013-(28-02-2013)-CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-02-28
13 122-KOLNP-2013-FORM-18.pdf 2014-10-13
14 122-KOLNP-2013-(28-02-2013)-PA.pdf 2013-02-28
14 122-KOLNP-2013-FER.pdf 2017-12-21
15 122-KOLNP-2013-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
15 122-KOLNP-2013.pdf 2013-01-18
16 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)CORRESPONDENCE.pdf 2013-01-14
16 122-KOLNP-2013-OTHERS [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
17 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-1.pdf 2013-01-14
17 122-KOLNP-2013-FER_SER_REPLY [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
18 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-2.pdf 2013-01-14
18 122-KOLNP-2013-CORRESPONDENCE [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
19 122-KOLNP-2013-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
19 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-3.pdf 2013-01-14
20 122-KOLNP-2013-CLAIMS [28-03-2018(online)].pdf 2018-03-28
20 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)FORM-5.pdf 2013-01-14
21 122-KOLNP-2013-HearingNoticeLetter.pdf 2018-07-13
21 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION.pdf 2013-01-14
22 122-KOLNP-2013-Written submissions and relevant documents (MANDATORY) [27-08-2018(online)].pdf 2018-08-27
22 122-Kolnp-2013-(14-01-2013)PCT SEARCH REPORT & OTHERS.pdf 2013-01-14

Search Strategy

1 SearchStrategy_21-12-2017.pdf