Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Trademark Information

Application ID
Status
Sub Status
Date of Application
06 October 2009
Classes
17
Proprietor
5 Th Floor, Satyanarayan Prasad Commercial Centre, Dayaldas Road, Behind State Bank Of India, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai 400 057
Agent
Sajeev Kumar S. Nair[32269]
Gopakumar Nair Associates, 3 Rd Floor, Shivmangal, Next To Big Bazaar, Akurli Road, Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400 101
Type
Device
State
Maharashtra
Country
Filing Mode
Branch Office
IP Office
MUMBAI
Used Since
30 September 2009
Valid / Upto
06 October 2029
Description
[Class : 17] High Density Polythylene Bottles
PR Details
Pursuant To A Request On Form Tm 34 Dated 08/10/2015 And Order Thereon Dated 15/09/2017 Registered Proprietor(s) Trade Or Business Address Is Altered To 5 Th Floor, Satyanarayan Prasad Commercial Centre, Dayaldas Road, Behind State Bank Of India, Off. Nehru Road, Vile Parle (E), Mumbai 400 057.
Pursuant To A Request On Form Tm P Dated 24/07/2018 And Order Thereon Dated 24/07/2018 The Address For Service Is Altered To Nair Sajeev Kumar S. , Gopakumar Nair Associates, 3 Rd Floor, Shivmangal, Next To Big Bazaar, Akurli Road, Kandivali (E), Mumbai 400 101 ,Gopanair@Gnaipr.Net
Registration Renewed For A Period Of 10 Years From 06/10/2019 Advertised In Journal No. 1874

Image (DEVICE)

Sirmaxo Device mark 1870034 Trademark

Frequently Asked Questions

Date on which the trademark application was filed with TMO?
Pop-pop was applied on 06 October 2009.
Who is the trademark proprietor?
Trademark application was filed by SIRMAXO CHEMICALS.
Trademark application is filed under which trademark class?
Trademark application has been filed under classes 17.
Trademark application is at what stage of trademark process?
As per IP India, trademark application status is Registered.
What is the Listed Application ID of the Trademark?
Listed application Id of Pop-pop is 1870034.
Who filed the trademark on behalf of the proprietor?
Trademark attorney of the Pop-pop is Sajeev Kumar S. Nair.