Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence
Trademark Information
Application ID
Status
Sub Status
Date of Application
09 February 2017
Classes
9,42
Proprietor
Guardsquare Nv
Tervuursevest 362/1
B 3000 Leuven
Be
Type
Device
State
State Not Specified
Country
Filing Mode
International Bureau
IP Office
IR DIVISION
Used Since
Valid / Upto
Description
[Class : 9] Computer Software For Building Applications, Namely Software Development Tools For The Creation Of Secure Mobile Applications; Computer Application Software For Providing Security, Namely, Software For Computers And Mobile Communication Devices In The Nature Of Application Protection Software, Obfuscation Software And Anti Tamper Software; Software For Protection Of Software Applications Against Reverse Engineering And Hacking; Software For Assessing, Reporting And Preventing The Security Risks And Privacy Risks Of Installing Software Designed For Mobile Communication Devices.[Class : 42] Consultancy In The Field Of Software For The Protection And Security Of Mobile Applications; Maintenance And Updating Of Software For The Protection And Security Of Mobile Applications; Designing And Developing Software For The Protection And Security Of Mobile Applications; Research And Development Of Technology In The Field Of Protection Of Software Applications.
Image (DEVICE)
Sign In to Follow Application All Documents & Correspondence
Uploaded Documents
1
Birth
12 May 2017
2
Journal Copy
03 Jul 2017
Frequently Asked Questions
Date on which the trademark application was filed with TMO?
Pop-pop was applied on 09 February 2017.
Who is the trademark proprietor?
Trademark application was filed by GUARDSQUARE NV.
Trademark application is filed under which trademark class?
Trademark application has been filed under classes 9,42.
Trademark application is at what stage of trademark process?
As per IP India, trademark application status is Protection Granted.
What is the Listed Application ID of the Trademark?
Listed application Id of Pop-pop is 3551523.
Who filed the trademark on behalf of the proprietor?