Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Trademark Information

Application ID
Status
Sub Status
Date of Application
06 June 2019
Classes
5
Proprietor
802, Advent Atria, Chincholi Bunder Road, Malad West, Mumbai 400064, Maharashtra, India
Attorney
Adv. Payal Jain[21573]
218, Second Floor, B Wing, Building No. 3, Mittal Industrial Estate, Marol, Andheri East, Mumbai 400059
Type
Word
State
Maharashtra
Country
Filing Mode
e-Filing
IP Office
MUMBAI
Used Since
Valid / Upto
Description
[Class : 5] Pharmaceutical Preparations, As Covered Under Class 5.
Sign In to Follow Application
All Documents & Correspondence

Uploaded Documents

1 TM-A(TRADE MARKS APPLICATION) 06 Jun 2019
2 TM-M(REQUEST SUBMITTING AUTHORISATION OF AGENT) 08 Nov 2019
3 Reply to Exam Report (MIS-R) 08 Nov 2019
4 Authorization Letter 10 Jun 2021
5 Documents in support of Show cause Hearing (SCH) 10 Jun 2021
6 Authorization Letter 12 Aug 2021
7 Journal Copy 27 Sep 2021
8 TM-O(NOTICE OF OPPOSITION) 17 Dec 2021

Correspondence and Notices

1 EXAMINATION REPORT 8708692   02 Aug 2019
2 Hearing Notice (Show Cause) 9902709   11 Mar 2020
3 Hearing Notice (Show Cause) 11447065   03 May 2021
4 Hearing Notice (Show Cause) 11660637   16 Jun 2021
5 Tribunal Accepted Notice for : 4198436 11987069 5275838 12 Aug 2021
6 Opposition Notice 13052570 5504215 19 Feb 2022
7 Order Form of 21(2) 15860098 6132776 18 Aug 2023

Frequently Asked Questions

Date on which the trademark application was filed with TMO?
Pop-pop was applied on 06 June 2019.
Who is the trademark proprietor?
Trademark application was filed by ARCHERCHEM HEALTHCARE.
Trademark application is filed under which trademark class?
Trademark application has been filed under classes 5.
Trademark application is at what stage of trademark process?
As per IP India, trademark application status is Abandoned.
What is the Listed Application ID of the Trademark?
Listed application Id of Pop-pop is 4198436.
Who filed the trademark on behalf of the proprietor?
Trademark attorney of the Pop-pop is Adv. Payal Jain.