August 07, 2025 by Amit Kumar
Under Section 2(1)(zb) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999:
A "trademark" means a mark capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others.
The term “mark” is further defined under Section 2(1)(m) to include:
A device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral, shape of goods, packaging, or combination thereof.
To qualify for registration, a trademark must:
Be capable of graphical representation
Be distinctive (inherent or acquired)
Not fall under grounds of refusal under Sections 9, 11, or 13
Not be prohibited under Section 12 unless conditions are met
Single words or combinations that function as brand names.
Examples:
Visual elements used as brand identifiers.
Examples
Phrases like “Yeh Dil Maange More” or “Think Different.” Registrable if they create brand distinctiveness.
Unique packaging or product shapes that distinguish a product.
Not allowed if the shape is functional (Section 9(3)).
E.g., Yahoo! yodel. Must be submitted in MP3 format and graphically represented in musical notation.
Registrable if proven to be strongly associated with the brand (e.g., Cadbury’s purple).
As technology evolves, so does the definition of what constitutes a “graphically representable” mark.
Used to indicate quality, origin, or group identity. E.g., AGMARK or ISRO logo for certified goods.
Section 9(3) of the Trade Marks Act lays out specific absolute grounds for refusal of shape-based trademarks. It prohibits trademarks that consist exclusively of:
Example: A Bread Loaf (Rectangular Block) — shape is natural to the method of baking and consumption
Example: Lego bricks – the interlocking studs serve a technical purpose/ Functional value
Example: Uniquely sculpted perfume bottles – the aesthetic itself adds value
Trademarks fall on a legal distinctiveness spectrum. The stronger the mark, the easier it is to register and enforce.
| Strength Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fanciful | Coined terms with no dictionary meaning | Xerox, Kodak |
| Arbitrary | Common words used in unrelated fields | Apple for computers |
| Suggestive | Suggests qualities without direct description | Netflix, Airbnb |
| Descriptive | Describes product features; requires proof of use | Cold & Creamy for ice cream |
| Generic | Common name of the product category; never registrable | Computer for computers |
Legal Note: Descriptive and generic marks are refused under Section 9(1)(a) and (b), unless secondary meaning (acquired distinctiveness) is proven.
When a mark that is not inherently distinctive becomes uniquely associated with a brand due to extensive and exclusive use, advertising, and consumer recognition.
Proviso to Section 9(1): Allows otherwise unregistrable marks to be accepted if they've acquired distinctiveness through long-term use.
Invoices, packaging samples
Advertising records
Sales figures
Social media engagement
User testimonials
Market surveys (if needed)
Even if your trademark isn’t registered, prior use can protect your rights.
Grants rights to a user who can prove use of a mark before the applicant of a conflicting registered mark.
Claim “user since” date while filing
Attach user affidavit with evidence
Use prior use in defense against oppositions or infringement claims
Section 12 allows registration of identical or similar trademarks for different proprietors in certain situations, if:
Honest concurrent use is established
No likelihood of confusion or deception exists
The Registrar is satisfied that it is in the public interest
To maximize trademark protection:
Choose inherently distinctive marks
Avoid generic or descriptive terms
Use and promote your mark consistently
Keep records to support acquired distinctiveness or prior use
File in the correct class with appropriate descriptions
Understand the scope of Section 12 for co-existence and defense
Pro Tip: Always conduct a prior public search, review classification guidelines, and take professional advice before filing.
Answer:
Yes, but only in limited circumstances. As per Section 2(1)(m) and Section 2(1)(zb) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the “shape of goods” is included under the definition of a “mark.” However, Section 9(3) carves out critical exceptions.
You cannot register a shape mark if it:
Results solely from the nature of the goods (e.g., a round ball for a cricket ball)
Is necessary to achieve a technical result (e.g., interlocking design of LEGO bricks)
Adds substantial value to the goods (e.g., artistically crafted perfume bottles)
Answer:
Acquired distinctiveness (also called secondary meaning) refers to a situation where a mark that is not inherently distinctive (e.g., descriptive or shape marks) becomes associated with your brand through prolonged and exclusive use.
How to Prove:
Extensive advertising and promotions
Sales data and market share reports
Media coverage and brand surveys
Invoices, packaging, labels showing the mark
User affidavit under Rule 25 of Trade Mark Rules, 2017
Legal Basis:
Proviso to Section 9(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 allows registration of otherwise non-distinctive marks if they have acquired distinctiveness.
Answer:
Yes, under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, you may be allowed to register the mark if you demonstrate:
Honest concurrent use of the mark
Substantial public recognition of your use
No likelihood of confusion or deception
Geographic or trade channel differentiation
You must file a detailed affidavit with evidence of use and request a hearing if the examiner objects.
Example:
Two unrelated entities using the same mark in different states or industries may be allowed to coexist under Section 12.
Answer:
Both have legal value, but they serve different purposes.
Registration gives you nationwide statutory rights under Section 28.
Prior Use offers protection under Section 34, which overrides even a later registration by another party.
Strategic Insight:
Even if your mark is unregistered, you can stop others from using it if you prove continuous and bona fide use prior to their application date.
Answer:
Descriptive marks are barred under Section 9(1)(b) unless they have acquired distinctiveness.
You must prove that your mark is recognized by the public as identifying your goods/services.
Not Registrable (without acquired distinctiveness):
“Cool Water” for bottled water
“Speedy Delivery” for courier services
Answer:
Yes, if it meets the criteria of distinctiveness and is used as a source identifier for your goods/services.
Requirements:
The domain/app name should not be generic (.e.g., "BookApp")
It should be capable of distinguishing your services
You must submit screenshots, downloads, and usage data
Tip: Always file in the correct class (e.g., Class 9 for downloadable apps, Class 42 for tech services)
Answer:
Yes, but only if it’s distinctive and not merely decorative.
Sound Mark: Must be submitted in MP3 format (<30 seconds) with a graphical representation (musical notations).
Color Mark: Must be a specific shade with evidence of long-term association with your brand (e.g., Tiffany Blue, Cadbury Purple)
Legal Standard: These are classified as non-conventional trademarks and must prove that the public recognizes them as source indicators.
Answer:
Trademark strength refers to the level of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of a mark and its enforceability.
| Type | Example | Registrability | Enforcement Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanciful | Kodak | Very High | Strong |
| Arbitrary | Apple (for phones) | High | Strong |
| Suggestive | Netflix | Moderate | Moderate |
| Descriptive | Fast Delivery | Weak (unless acquired distinctiveness) | Weak |
| Generic | Water (for water) | Not Allowed | No Protection |
Choosing a stronger mark increases your chances of successful registration, brand equity, and court protection.
Answer:
No. Common law rights under passing off still exist if you have used the mark extensively. However:
You cannot use ® (registered symbol)
You may face challenges in enforcement or commercial transactions (licensing, franchising)
You may lose priority in domain and international filings
Best Practice: Register your mark and maintain evidence of its use.
Answer:
Yes, under Section 2(1)(zb), personal names are valid trademarks if they are used in trade and capable of distinguishing.
Examples:
“SHAHRUKH KHAN” for entertainment services
“RAJIV GANDHI” for educational institutions
Note: Public figures may face additional scrutiny to avoid misappropriation.