Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Hydrotreating Catalyst, Process For Preparing The Same And Use Thereof

Abstract: HYDROTREATING CATALYST, PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME AND USE THEREOF Abstract Of The Invention The present invention relates to a hydrotreating catalyst. More particularly the catalyst of present invention comprises of Group VIB and Group VIII metals impregnated on non-refractory oxide as a catalyst support and process for preparing and its use thereof.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
07 December 2012
Publication Number
30/2014
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
CHEMICAL
Status
Email
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2019-06-03
Renewal Date

Applicants

Indian Oil Corporation Limited
G-9  Ali Yavar Jung Marg  Bandra (East)  Mumbai-400 051  India

Inventors

1. RAJESH  Muniaswamy
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
2. SAU  Madhusudan
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
3. KUMAR  Balam Harish
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
4. KUMAR  Brijesh
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
5. RAJAGOPAL  Santanam
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
6. MALHOTRA  Ravinder Kumar
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
7. SHARMA  Durlubh Kumar
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India
8. CHRISTOPHER  Jayaraj
c/o Indian Oil Corporation Limited  R&D Centre  Sector-13  Faridabad-121007  Haryana  India

Specification

DESC:FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a hydrotreating catalyst. More particularly the catalyst of present invention comprises of Group VIB and Group VIII metals impregnated on non-refractory oxide as a catalyst support and process for preparing and its use thereof.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION:
Globally, there is an increasing demand for biofuels as an alternative to diesel fuel. due to environmental reasons. Biofuel such as biodiesel are made from non-edible oils such as Jatropha, Karanjia, rubber seed oil, cotton seed oil, waste restaurant oil, etc. Chemically, these oils have similar triglyceride structure with different fatty acid composition. Cleavage of carbon –oxygen bonds from these oils can produce high quality (with respect to Cetane number) diesel range components which are fully compatible with conventional diesel produced from crude oil refining.

Many processes such as transesterification, enzyme hydrolysis, supercritical methanol, hydrotreating, etc. exists to produce biodiesel from vegetable oil in which hydrotreating is one of the important processes being used in refineries mainly to produce low sulphur diesel from gas oil feed stocks to meet diesel fuel specification. Hydrotreating catalysts comprise of a carrier (also referred as catalyst support) wherein metals from Group VI B and Group VIII are impregnated. Major catalyst support materials being employed for hydrotreating of gas oil are alumina, silica, silica-alumina, magnesia, zirconia, titania as well as mixtures thereof. Such conventional catalyst systems are being used in refineries for hydrotreating of different streams produced from refining of petroleum or Oil derived from Coal. The physical characteristics of feed stock such as viscosity, metals, molecular size and boiling range has a lot of impact for choosing hydrotreating catalysts for particular application. It has been well established that hydrotreating catalyst systems are working well with feed stocks containing low amount of metal content and trace amount of oxygen content.

Non-edible oil generally contains 10-12% wt of oxygen and metals (sodium, potassium, calcium, iron, magnesium, etc.) in the range of 100-500 ppm. These metals in vegetable oils are to be removed prior to processing in hydrotreating.

Hydrotreating catalysts are generally comprises metals such as Molybdenum, Cobalt or Nickel supported on Alumina.

Over the years, hydroprocessing catalysts are exclusively being developed for dealing with the elimination of sulphur and nitrogen hetero atoms from petroleum streams and presently researchers are using the same for conversion of highly oxygen rich high molecular weight vegetable oil into fuels, which might affect catalyst life. Since vegetable oil are bulky in nature in comparison to gas oil molecules which therefore need wide range of pores on the support systems to process bulky molecules. The major problem associated with hydrotreating of vegetable oil is its high coke formation tendency, which leads to blockage of catalyst active sites. Therefore, support for the preparation of catalyst should have high surface area in order to accommodate catalyst particles very well along with varying pore size distribution essentially consists of micro and meso pore range which helps the bulky vegetable oil molecules can easily move within the catalyst systems, along with less prone to coke formation would be preferred. Therefore, there is a continuing need in the art of making new catalyst systems which can perform better for hydrodesulphurization and also are capable of eliminating simultaneously oxygen and sulphur.

In light of the above mentioned prior arts, there is a need to provide for an improved catalyst which is more suited for preparing diesel-range hydrocarbons from feed comprising vegetable oils. Also, there is a need to provide for a process for preparation of the aforesaid catalyst. Also, there is a need to provide for a method of producing diesel-range hydrocarbons from vegetable oils using the aforesaid catalyst.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides a hydrotreating catalyst comprising:
• a non-refractory oxide as a catalyst support;
• a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support; and
• a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

In another aspect the present invention provides a process for preparing a hydrotreating catalyst, said process comprising the steps of:
• impregnating a non-refractory oxide catalyst support with an aqueous solution comprising a source of Group VIB metal and a source of Group VIII metal to obtain wet impregnated support;
• drying the wet-impregnated support for about 1 to 5 hours at a temperature in the range of about 100 to 120oC to obtain impregnated support; and
• calcining the impregnated support at a temperature in the range of about 500 to 600oC for a time period in the range of about 1 to 5 hours to obtain the hydrotreating catalyst;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 10 to 18 wt% of the Group VIB metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of the Group VIII metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

In yet another aspect the present invention provides a process for producing diesel range hydrocarbons from a feed comprising vegetable oil and or vegetable oil with gas oil , said process comprising the steps of:
a. contacting the feed within a hydrotreatment reaction zone with a gas comprising hydrogen under hydrotreatment conditions in presence of a hydrotreating catalyst comprising a non-refractory oxide catalyst support, a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support and a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
b. removing a hydrotreated product stream; and
c. separating diesel range hydrocarbons from the hydrotreated product stream
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. As used in the specification, and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, “the”, include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

The present invention pertains to a catalyst composition for preparing diesel-range hydrocarbons from feed comprising vegetable oil, a process for preparing the same and its use thereof in producing diesel-range hydrocarbons.

According to the present invention the catalyst is a hydrotreating catalyst, wherein the metals are impregnated on a non-refractory oxide catalyst support. The catalyst herein comprises a Group VIB metal such as Molybdenum and a Group VIII metal such as Cobalt or Nickel being impregnated on a support. The support according to the invention is porous activated carbon.

According to the invention, the catalyst composition is having Group VIB metal content in the range of about 10-18 wt% and Group VIII metal content of about 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on the total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

In a preferred embodiment, the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum. In yet another preferred embodiment the Group VIII metal is selected Cobalt or Nickel. The catalyst of the present invention may further comprise a Group IIIA element impregnated on the support. In case the catalyst comprises Group IIIA element, the same may be preferably chosen as phosphorous and can be present in the range of about 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on the total weight of the finished catalyst composition. In a particular embodiment, when the catalyst comprises Nickel impregnated on the support along with Molybdenum, the catalyst does not contain any added Group IIIA element and/or Group VA element. In still another preferred aspect of the invention, an amount of porous activated carbon is in the range of about 70-85 wt% based on the total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

The catalyst has a BET surface area in the range of about 50 to 300 m2/g; average pore diameter of 12 to 100 Å; and pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g

Further the present invention provides a process for preparing the hydrotreating catalyst comprising the steps of:
(a) impregnating a non-refractory oxide catalyst support with an aqueous solution comprising a source of Group VIB metal and a source of Group VIII metal to obtain wet impregnated support;
(b) drying the wet-impregnated support for about 1 to 5 hours at a temperature in the range of about 100 to 120oC to obtain impregnated support; and
(c) calcining the impregnated support at a temperature in the range of about 500 to 600oC for a time period in the range of about 1 to 5 hours to obtain the hydrotreating catalyst.

The amount of Group VIB metal source, the Group VIB metal being preferably Molybdenum, present in the aqueous solution is such that 10 to 18 wt% of the Group VIB metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support and the amount of Group VIII metal source, the Group VIII metal being preferably Cobalt or Nickel, present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of the Group VIII metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

According to an embodiment, ammonium hepta molybdate may be chosen as source of molybdenum. According to an embodiment, cobalt nitrate hexahydrate may be chosen as cobalt source. According to another embodiment, Nickel nitrate hexahydrate may be chosen as Nickel source.

According to an embodiment, the aqueous solution further comprises a Group IIIA element source. An amount of Group IIIA element source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 of the Group IIIA element based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support. The Group IIIA element in a preferred aspect of the invention is Phosphorous. In a preferred aspect, the Group IIIA element source also acts as Group VIB metal source and is Phosphomolybdic acid.

In a preferred aspect of the invention, the porous activated carbon has BET surface area in the range of 500 to 1500 (1500 m2/g; Bulk density in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 g/cc; average pore diameter in the range of 12 to 100 Å; and Pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

Further, the present invention provides a process for producing diesel range hydrocarbons from a feed comprising vegetable oil and or vegetable oil with gas oil, said process comprising the steps of:
a. contacting the feed within a hydrotreatment reaction zone with a gas comprising hydrogen under hydrotreatment conditions in presence of a hydrotreating catalyst comprising a non-refractory oxide catalyst support, a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support and a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
b. removing a hydrotreated product stream; and
c. separating diesel range hydrocarbons from the hydrotreated product stream.

In an embodiment, the vegetable oil is selected from a group comprising of Jatropha Oil, Karanjia Oil, Rubber seed oil, Cotton Seed oil, waste restaurant oil and or mixtures thereof. In a preferred aspect, the feed comprises a mixture of vegetable oil and gas oil with up to about 20 wt% of vegetable oil.

In the process described above, the hydrotreatment in step (a) is carried out at a temperature from about 350° C to about 400° C. The hydrotreatment reaction zone has an LHSV (Liquid Hour Space Velocity) from 0.5 hr-1 to 2 hr-1 a hydrogen partial pressure from about 60 bar to about 120 bar. Also, hydrotreatment reaction zone has H2 gas to feed ratio from about 400 Nm3/m3 to 600 Nm3/m3.

It has been observed that the catalyst provided in the present invention removes oxygen from vegetable oils, removes sulphur from various petroleum feed stocks, more preferably enables deep desulphurization and aromatic saturation of neat gas oil and also simultaneously functions in hydrodesulphurization and hydrodeoxygenation of blended feed stocks such as mixture of vegetable oil and high sulphur gas oil. Accordingly, the catalyst of the present invention is used to convert feedstocks into diesel range hydrocarbons with high Cetane index and low density.

The performance of the catalyst is evaluated for simultaneous functions of hydrodesulphurization, hydrodearomatization and hydrodeoxygenation of feed stock. In accordance with the present invention the catalyst results in more than 99% sulphur reduction in neat gas oil. In accordance with the present invention the catalyst results in 100% oxygen removal from vegetable oil such as Jatropha oil.

In accordance with the present invention the catalyst simultaneously removes sulphur more than 99% and oxygen 100% from composite feed containing vegetable oil up to 20wt%.

According to the invention, before being used in hydrotreating, the catalyst is presulfided to convert the metal oxides into corresponding metal sulphides using Dimethyl disulphide (DMDS) as sulfiding agent.

The additional by products such as CO2, H2O, CO formed during vegetable oil co-processing with gas oil by hydrotreating, in addition to H2S and NH3, does not alter the catalyst activity in the duration of study with respect to sulphur and oxygen removal efficiency. Further, the hydrotreated diesel is been less prone to rancidification than biodiesel produced from transesterification of vegetable oil.

Following example further illustrates the present invention without limiting the scope of the invention:

Example 1: Process for preparing catalyst having Cobalt and Molybdenum impregnated on activated carbon

Activated carbon having a BET surface area at least about 1100m2/g was obtained from commercial sources. The catalyst support was employed in the form of extrudates. Molybdenum source i.e. Phosphomolybdic acid was dissolved in distilled water was added to carbon support. This mixture was slowly stirred for 1 hr at room temperature. To this, aqueous solution of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate was added and stirring continued slowly for 12 hrs. After stirring was over, the resultant solution was slowly evaporated on a hot plate at 80°C with heating rate of 0.3?C/minute. After that it was kept in an oven for 12 hrs at 110°C with heating rate of 0.3?C/minute. Subsequently, the material was taken in platinum crucible covered with lid, calcined at 500°C for 1 hr in an inert atmosphere. The resultant material was kept in muffle furnace at 350°C for 2 hrs to obtain the final catalyst. XRD spectra of the catalyst have shown that the active species of the catalyst was obtained in the form of CoMoO4/CoMoO3.The detail of this catalyst is given below in Table 1. Surface area of the final catalyst was found to be 223m2/g. The catalyst thus prepared was sulphided in situ in order to convert metal oxides into metal sulphides by any known sulphidation method in the art, such as passing a mixture of Dimethyl disulphide dissolved in any gas oil in presence of hydrogen gas over the catalyst at elevated temperature up to, but not limited to 400?C at high hydrogen partial pressure for 2-24 hrs, say 5 hrs.

The performance of the catalyst prepared in example 1 after sulphidation was studied for hydrotreating of neat gas oil (Example 2) neat Jatropha oil (Example 3) and Jatropha oil blended with gas oil (Example 4).

Table 1:Final Catalyst properties
Support material Activated carbon
Active metals Molybdenum, Cobalt
BET Surface area,m2/g 223
Catalyst shape Cylindrical
Active species CoMoO4/CoMoO3
Approximate catalyst composition Cobalt 0.5wt%
Molybdenum 13wt%

Note: BET stands for Brunauer, Emmet, Teller

Example 2:Catalyst performance in Neat gas oil

Neat gas oil was hydrotreated using the catalyst prepared in Example 1 above. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3.The results of the same are given in table2.

Table 2: Properties of Feed gas oil and hydrotreated gas oil product
Feed (Gas oil) Hydrotreated Product
Specific Gravity 0.8452 0.8146
Sulphur, ppm 13, 600 30
Nitrogen, ppm 106 1
Cetane Index 51.5 62.4
ASTM D-86 (%Vol. vs. Temp(°C)
IBP (Initial Boiling Point) 182 137
5 213 176
10 230 198
20 253 227
30 267 248
40 279 261
50 289 273
60 300 284
70 312 297
80 326 312
90 345 333
95 363 353
FBP(Final Boiling Point) 374 362

It has been found that the performance of the developed catalyst for hydrotreating of gas oil under the said reaction conditions is found to meeting the diesel product specifications.

Example 3: Catalyst performance in neat non-edible oil (Jatropha)

Further, experiments have been conducted with neat non-edible oil (Jatropha) using the developed catalyst of example 1. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results are shown in table 3.

Table 3: Properties of neat Jatropha oil and product of hydrotreated Jatropha oil
Feed (Jatropha Oil) Hydrotreated product
Specific Gravity 0.9204 0.7967
Sulphur, ppm Nil Nil
Nitrogen, ppm Nil Nil
Cetane Index 75.6
Total Acid Number (mgKOH/g) 19.2 0.05
ASTM D-86 (% Vol. vs. Temp (°C))
IBP 163
5 196
10 216
20 245
30 261
40 274
50 284
60 293
70 302
80 313
90 332
95 355
FBP (Final Boiling Point) 373

Boiling range of neat Jatropha oil is 380°C+ (Ref: Green Chemistry., 2010, 12, 2232-2239)

It can be seen that vegetable oil has been converted into diesel range hydrocarbons with high Cetane Index and low density. The high Cetane index and low density and zero sulphur will provide a scope of adding various low value streams in the refineries into diesel pool for meeting BS-IV and higher specification. Further, it has been found that the removal of oxygen from the feed predominantly occurs via hydrodeoxygenation/decarboxylation route. FT-IR spectra have shown no ester/acid functional group in the product thus confirms 100% conversion of triglycerides has occurred.

Example 4: Catalyst performance in a blend of Jatropha oil and gas oil

Experiments were conducted for co-processing of blends of Jatropha oil and gas oil with up to 20% with Jatropha oil. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results are shown in table 4.

Table 4: Properties of neat gas oil, products from neat gas oil, 5, 10 and 20% Jatropha oil with gas oil

Feed (gas oil) Hydrotreated Product (from gas oil feed) Hydrotreated Product (from 5% Jatropha oil in gas oil feed) Hydrotreated Product (from 10% Jatropha oil in gas oil feed) Hydrotreated Product (from 20% Jatropha oil in gas oil feed)
Specific gravity 0.8452 0.8146 0.8143 0.8136 0.8122
Sulphur 13, 600 30 15 5 3
Nitrogen 106 1 1 1 1
Cetane Index 51.5 62.4 63.1 64.4 66
ASTM D-86 (%Vol. vs. Temp(°C)
IBP 182 137 143 147 142
5 213 176 182 183 185
10 230 198 202 206 208
20 253 227 231 236 238
30 267 248 250 255 257
40 279 261 264 267 270
50 289 273 275 278 280
60 300 284 286 288 290
70 312 297 297 299 301
80 326 312 312 313 312
90 345 333 333 333 331
95 363 353 353 354 355
FBP 374 362 364 367 370

The above results indicate that up to 20% Jatropha oil can be easily co-processed with gas oil using the developed catalyst. Further the results have shown that reduction in density and sulphur was occurred when Jatropha oil concentration was increased. Thus catalyst was found to have excellent catalytic activity for simultaneous elimination of sulphur and oxygen.

Example 5: Comparative analysis

A study was undertaken to compare the performance of the catalyst prepared in accordance with Example 1 with a commercially available catalyst which contained Co-Mo/Al2O3. The analysis was performed on two types of Feeds, wherein Feed 1 comprised of 10% Jatropha Oil in Gas Oil and Feed 2 comprised of 20% Jatropha Oil in Gas Oil. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results are shown in Table 5.

Table 5: Comparative results
Hydrotreated products obtained from Feed 1 using commercial catalyst Hydrotreated products obtained from Feed 1 using catalyst of Ex. 1 Hydrotreated products obtained from Feed 2 using commercial catalyst Hydrotreated products obtained from Feed 2 using catalyst of Ex. 1
Specific gravity 0.8194 0.8136 0.8184 0.8122
Sulphur 25 5 10 3
Nitrogen 1 1 1 1
Cetane Index 61.3 64.4 62.6 66
ASTM D-86 (%Vol. vs. Temp(°C)
IBP 127 147 125 142
5 174 183 178 185
10 195 206 201 208
20 226 236 229 238
30 253 255 256 257
40 267 267 271 270
50 279 278 283 280
60 290 288 292 290
70 302 299 305 301
80 315 313 318 312
90 340 333 343 331
95 368 354 368 355
FBP 375 367 370 370

It may be noted that Feed 1 had Density of 0.8527 g/cc; sulphur content of 11,900 ppm and nitrogen content of 95 ppm, while Feed 2 had Density of 0.8604 g/cc; sulphur content of 9000 ppm and nitrogen content of 85 ppm.

Example 6: Catalyst performance in a blend of Karanjia oil and gas oil

Experiments were conducted for co-processing of blended oil having 20 wt% Karanjia oil and the remaining being gas oil. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results are shown in table 6.

Table 6: Properties of 20% Karanjia oil with gas oil and products obtained therefrom
Characteristics 20% Karanjia in gas oil feed Hydrotreated products of 20% Karanjia in gas oil
Density, g/cc 0.8611 0.8127
Sulphur, ppm 9300 3
Nitrogen, ppm 85 1
TAN, mg KOH/g 0.03
Cetane Index 67
D-86 (% vol. vs. Temp(?C)
IBP 163
5 236
10 250
20 262
30 271
40 279
50 287
60 295
70 304
80 315
90 338
95 364
FBP 370

Example 7: Process for preparing catalyst having Nickel and Molybdenum impregnated on activated carbon

Step 1: 4 gm of ammonium hepta molybdate (AHM) was dissolved in deionized water. The aqueous mixture from step 1 was poured onto around 10 gm of activated carbon taken in a beaker. The mixture was stirred well for 1 hr.
Step 2: About 2 gm of Nickel (II) Nitrate hexahydrate was dissolved in deionized water. The aqueous mixture of step 2 was added to the product material of step 1 and stirring was continued for 10-15 hrs, say 8 hrs.
Step 3: The impregnated material from step 2 was heated slowly in oven at 100-120oC with heating rate of 0.3oC/min for 1-5 hrs, say 4 hrs.
Step 4: The dried material obtained from step3 was heated in an inert atmosphere at 500oC for 1 hr. The resulting material was referred as Nickel–Molybdenum/Activated Carbon supported Catalyst.
The detail of this catalyst is given below in Table 7.

Table 7: Final Ni-Mo/Carbon Catalyst properties
Support material Activated carbon
Active metals Molybdenum, Nickel
BET Surface area,m2/g 250

Example 8: Ni-Mo/Carbon Catalyst’s performance in Jatropha oil blended with gas oil

The performance of the Ni-Mo/Carbon catalyst prepared in example 7 was studied for hydrotreating of Jatropha oil blended with gas oil. For doing so, two feeds namely a feed comprising 5 wt% Jatropha Oil blended with gas oil and a feed comprising 10 wt% Jatropha Oil blended with gas oil were taken. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results of the same are given in table 8.

Table 8: Hydrotreating properties of Ni-Mo/Carbon catalyst on Jatropha oil blended with gas oil

Characteristics 5% Jatropha in gas oil feed Hydrotreated products of 5 % Jatropha in gas oil 10% Jatropha in gas oil feed Hydrotreated products of 10% Jatropha in gas oil
Density, g/cc 0.8487 0.8230 0.8527 0.8225
Sulphur, ppm 12,900 25 11,900 10
Nitrogen, ppm 95 1 95 1
TAN, mg KOH/g
Cetane Index 59.2 59.8
D-86 (% vol. vs. Temp(?C)
IBP
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
95
FBP

155
207
226
244
257
267
277
288
300
314
335
356
363

112
206
223
244
256
268
279
288
300
313
335
363
370

Example 9: Comparative analysis

A study was undertaken to compare the performance of the catalyst prepared in accordance with Example 1 and the catalyst prepared in accordance with Example 7 with a commercially available catalyst which contained Co-MO/Al2O3. The analysis was performed on pure Jatropha oil feed. The operating conditions included H2 partial pressure: 90 bar, Temperature: 370°C, LHSV: 1hr-1 and Gas to Oil ratio: 500 Nm3/m3. The results are shown in Table 9.

Table 9: Comparative Results

Characteristics Pure Jatropha oil feed Hydrotreated Jatropha oil
Commercial
Co-Mo/Al2O3 Inventive
Co-Mo/Carbon Inventive
Ni-Mo/Carbon
Density, g/cc 0.9204 0.7990 0.7967 0.7993
Sulphur, ppm NIL NIL NIL NIL
Nitrogen, ppm NIL NIL NIL NIL
TAN, mg KOH/g 24 0.05 0.05 0.05
Cetane Index 78.7 75.6 77.1
D-86 (% vol. vs. Temp(?C)
IBP
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
95
FBP

141
251
271
286
292
295
300
304
306
310
335
356
372

163
196
216
245
261
274
284
293
302
313
332
355
373

144
259
275
282
289
293
295
298
301
307
333
350
372

While the present invention has been described and illustrated by reference to particular embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention lends itself to variations not necessarily illustrated herein. For this reason, then, reference should be made solely to the appended to claims for purposes of determining the true scope of the present invention.

WE CLAIM:
1. A hydrotreating catalyst comprising:
• a non-refractory oxide catalyst support;
• a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support; and
• a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

2. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

3. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the Group VIII metal is Cobalt or Nickel.

4. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst further comprises 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of a Group IIIA element impregnated on the support.

5. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 4, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

6. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein an amount of porous activated carbon is in the range of 70 to 85 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

7. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has a BET surface area in the range of 50 to 300 m2/g.

8. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100Å.

9. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

10. A process for preparing a hydrotreating catalyst, said process comprising the steps of:
• impregnating a non-refractory oxide catalyst support with an aqueous solution comprising a source of Group VIB metal and a source of Group VIII metal to obtain wet impregnated support;
• drying the wet-impregnated support for about 1 to 5 hours at a temperature in the range of about 100 to 120oC to obtain impregnated support; and
• calcining the impregnated support at a temperature in the range of about 500 to 600oC for a time period in the range of about 1 to 5 hours to obtain the hydrotreating catalyst;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 10 to 18 wt% of the Group VIB metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of the Group VIII metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

11. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

12. The process as claimed in claim 11, wherein the source of Group VIB metal is ammonium hepta molybdenum.

13. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the Group VIII metal is Coblat or Nickel.

14. The process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the source of Group VIII metal is selected from the group comprising of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate and Nickel (II) Nitrate hexa hydrate.

15. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the aqueous solution further comprises a Group IIIA element source, an amount of Group III A element source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 of the Group IIIA element based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

16. The process as claimed in claim 15, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

17. The process as claimed in claim 15, wherein the Group IIIA element source also acts as Group VIB metal source.

18. The process as claimed in claim 17, wherein the Group IIIA element source acting as Group VIB metal source is Phosphomolybdic acid.

19. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the porous activated carbon has:
a. BET surface area in the range of 500 to 1500 (1500) m2/g;
b. Bulk density in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 g/cc;
c. Average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100 Å; and
d. Pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

20. A process for producing diesel range hydrocarbons from a feed comprising vegetable oil and or vegetable oil with gas oil , said process comprising the steps of:
a. contacting the feed within a hydrotreatment reaction zone with a gas comprising hydrogen under hydrotreatment conditions in presence of a hydrotreating catalyst comprising a non-refractory oxide catalyst support, a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support and a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
b. removing a hydrotreated product stream; and
c. separating diesel range hydrocarbons from the hydrotreated product stream
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

21. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the vegetable oil is selected from a group comprising of Jatropha Oil, Karanjia Oil, Rubber seed oil, Cotton Seed oil, waste restaurant oil and or mixtures thereof.

22. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the feed comprises a mixture of vegetable oil and gas oil with up to about 20 wt% of vegetable oil.

23. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment in step (a) is carried out at a temperature from about 350° C to about 400° C.

24. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has an LHSV from 0.5 hr-1 to 2 hr-1.

25. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has hydrogen partial pressure from about 60 bar to about 120 bar.

26. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has H2 gas to feed ratio from about 400 Nm3/m3 to 600 Nm3/m3.

27. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

28. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the Group VIII metal is Cobalt or Nickel.

29. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst further comprises 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of a Group IIIA element impregnated on the support.

30. The process as claimed in claim 29, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

31. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein an amount of porous activated carbon is in the range of 70 to 85 w5% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

32. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has a BET surface area in the range of 50 to 300 m2/g.

33. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100 Å.

34. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

,CLAIMS:WE CLAIM:
1. A hydrotreating catalyst comprising:
• a non-refractory oxide catalyst support;
• a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support; and
• a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

2. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

3. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the Group VIII metal is Cobalt or Nickel.

4. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst further comprises 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of a Group IIIA element impregnated on the support.

5. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 4, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

6. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein an amount of porous activated carbon is in the range of 70 to 85 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

7. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has a BET surface area in the range of 50 to 300 m2/g.

8. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100Å.

9. The hydrotreating catalyst as claimed in claim 1, wherein the catalyst has pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

10. A process for preparing a hydrotreating catalyst, said process comprising the steps of:
• impregnating a non-refractory oxide catalyst support with an aqueous solution comprising a source of Group VIB metal and a source of Group VIII metal to obtain wet impregnated support;
• drying the wet-impregnated support for about 1 to 5 hours at a temperature in the range of about 100 to 120oC to obtain impregnated support; and
• calcining the impregnated support at a temperature in the range of about 500 to 600oC for a time period in the range of about 1 to 5 hours to obtain the hydrotreating catalyst;
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 10 to 18 wt% of the Group VIB metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of the Group VIII metal based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

11. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

12. The process as claimed in claim 11, wherein the source of Group VIB metal is ammonium hepta molybdenum.

13. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the Group VIII metal is Coblat or Nickel.

14. The process as claimed in claim 13, wherein the source of Group VIII metal is selected from the group comprising of cobalt nitrate hexahydrate and Nickel (II) Nitrate hexa hydrate.

15. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the aqueous solution further comprises a Group IIIA element source, an amount of Group III A element source present in the aqueous solution is such that 0.1 to 5.0 of the Group IIIA element based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition is incorporated in the support.

16. The process as claimed in claim 15, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

17. The process as claimed in claim 15, wherein the Group IIIA element source also acts as Group VIB metal source.

18. The process as claimed in claim 17, wherein the Group IIIA element source acting as Group VIB metal source is Phosphomolybdic acid.

19. The process as claimed in claim 10, wherein the porous activated carbon has:
a. BET surface area in the range of 500 to 1500 (1500) m2/g;
b. Bulk density in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 g/cc;
c. Average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100 Å; and
d. Pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

20. A process for producing diesel range hydrocarbons from a feed comprising vegetable oil and or vegetable oil with gas oil , said process comprising the steps of:
a. contacting the feed within a hydrotreatment reaction zone with a gas comprising hydrogen under hydrotreatment conditions in presence of a hydrotreating catalyst comprising a non-refractory oxide catalyst support, a Group VIB metal impregnated on the support and a Group VIII metal impregnated on the support;
b. removing a hydrotreated product stream; and
c. separating diesel range hydrocarbons from the hydrotreated product stream
characterized in that:
• the support comprises porous activated carbon;
• an amount of Group VIB metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 10 to 18 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition; and
• an amount of Group VIII metal impregnated on the support is in the range of 0.1 to 5.0 wt% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

21. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the vegetable oil is selected from a group comprising of Jatropha Oil, Karanjia Oil, Rubber seed oil, Cotton Seed oil, waste restaurant oil and or mixtures thereof.

22. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the feed comprises a mixture of vegetable oil and gas oil with up to about 20 wt% of vegetable oil.

23. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment in step (a) is carried out at a temperature from about 350° C to about 400° C.

24. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has an LHSV from 0.5 hr-1 to 2 hr-1.

25. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has hydrogen partial pressure from about 60 bar to about 120 bar.

26. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the hydrotreatment reaction zone has H2 gas to feed ratio from about 400 Nm3/m3 to 600 Nm3/m3.

27. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the Group VIB metal is Molybdenum.

28. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the Group VIII metal is Cobalt or Nickel.

29. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst further comprises 0.1 to 5.0 wt% of a Group IIIA element impregnated on the support.

30. The process as claimed in claim 29, wherein the Group IIIA element is Phosphorous.

31. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein an amount of porous activated carbon is in the range of 70 to 85 w5% based on a total weight of the finished catalyst composition.

32. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has a BET surface area in the range of 50 to 300 m2/g.

33. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has average pore diameter is in the range of 12 to 100 Å.

34. The process as claimed in claim 20, wherein the catalyst has pore volume in the range of 0.3 to 1.4 cc/g.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2603-MUM-2012-FORM 4 [29-12-2023(online)].pdf 2023-12-29
1 Form 3 [11-08-2016(online)].pdf 2016-08-11
2 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-29
2 OnlinePostDating.pdf 2018-08-11
3 complete specification.pdf 2018-08-11
3 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [23-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-23
4 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-07
4 2603-MUM-2012-FORM 1(25-2-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
5 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [16-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-16
5 2603-MUM-2012-FER.pdf 2018-08-11
6 2603-MUM-2012-IntimationOfGrant03-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-03
6 2603-MUM-2012-CORRESPONDENCE(25-2-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
7 2603-MUM-2012-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
7 2603-MUM-2012-PatentCertificate03-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-03
8 2603-MUM-2012-OTHERS [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
8 2603-MUM-2012-CLAIMS [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
9 2603-MUM-2012-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
9 2603-MUM-2012-FER_SER_REPLY [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
10 2603-MUM-2012-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
10 2603-MUM-2012-FER_SER_REPLY [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
11 2603-MUM-2012-CLAIMS [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
11 2603-MUM-2012-OTHERS [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
12 2603-MUM-2012-PatentCertificate03-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-03
12 2603-MUM-2012-PETITION UNDER RULE 137 [01-09-2018(online)].pdf 2018-09-01
13 2603-MUM-2012-CORRESPONDENCE(25-2-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
13 2603-MUM-2012-IntimationOfGrant03-06-2019.pdf 2019-06-03
14 2603-MUM-2012-FER.pdf 2018-08-11
14 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [16-03-2020(online)].pdf 2020-03-16
15 2603-MUM-2012-FORM 1(25-2-2013).pdf 2018-08-11
15 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [07-10-2021(online)].pdf 2021-10-07
16 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [23-09-2022(online)].pdf 2022-09-23
16 complete specification.pdf 2018-08-11
17 2603-MUM-2012-RELEVANT DOCUMENTS [29-09-2023(online)].pdf 2023-09-29
17 OnlinePostDating.pdf 2018-08-11
18 Form 3 [11-08-2016(online)].pdf 2016-08-11
18 2603-MUM-2012-FORM 4 [29-12-2023(online)].pdf 2023-12-29

Search Strategy

1 2603MUM2012(1)search_15-02-2018.pdf

ERegister / Renewals

3rd: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2014 - To 07/12/2015

4th: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2015 - To 07/12/2016

5th: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2016 - To 07/12/2017

6th: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2017 - To 07/12/2018

7th: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2018 - To 07/12/2019

8th: 11 Jun 2019

From 07/12/2019 - To 07/12/2020

9th: 01 Dec 2020

From 07/12/2020 - To 07/12/2021

10th: 25 Nov 2021

From 07/12/2021 - To 07/12/2022

11th: 29 Nov 2022

From 07/12/2022 - To 07/12/2023

12th: 29 Dec 2023

From 07/12/2023 - To 07/12/2024

13th: 25 Nov 2024

From 07/12/2024 - To 07/12/2025