Claims:We claim:

1. A method for managing time-critical events associated with critical devices, the method comprising:
identifying, by a critical event managing system (101), one or more time-critical events from a plurality of events based on predetermined factors related to the plurality of events, wherein the plurality of events are determined from a first procedural sequences (201) identified from at least one of procedural narration by a practitioner and stored protocol manual;
determining, by the critical event managing system (101), at least one of, one or more missed and incorrect events from the identified one or more time-critical events, based on a comparison between reference and observed values associated with a plurality of parameters associated with the critical devices;
providing, by the critical event managing system (101), a revised execution plan (207) for the one or more missed and incorrect events iteratively, based on historical data, data provided by the practitioner, the first procedural sequences (201), and metadata associated with the plurality of parameters;
executing, by the critical event managing system (101), the one or more missed and incorrect events as second procedural sequences (209) within a predefined time frame based on the revised execution plan (207); and
combining, by the critical event managing system (101), outcome from the execution of the first procedural sequences (201) and the second procedural sequences (209) to manage the time-critical events associated with the critical devices.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the predetermined factors comprises one of minimum and maximum time gap of the one or more missed events of the plurality of time-critical events, a time duration for executing an event and dependency among plurality of events.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising determining the plurality of events by identifying one or more actions from the procedural narration by the practitioner and the stored protocol manuals and associating the one or more actions with a target object upon which the one or more actions is to be performed.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising querying the practitioner handling the critical devices to check if the missed event of the plurality of events is critical and depends on any other events in past and wherein while determining the at least one or more missed and incorrect events, subsequent events from the first procedural sequences are executed on identifying a match between the reference and the observed value on comparison.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein on identifying a mismatch between the reference and observed values during comparison, generation of the revised execution plan (207) is delayed for a specific time period within the predefined time frame to monitor whether values of the predetermined parameters come to a permitted range, without any changes in values of other predetermined parameters.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising discarding one or more non-critical activities associated with the one or more missed events to execute the one or more missed events within the predefined time frame, wherein the one or more non-critical activities are discarded based on importance of the one or more non-critical activities, smallest time period after which impact of the one or more non-critical activities diminishes, minimization of loss due to discarding and potential reversal of the discarded one or more non-critical activities.

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising alerting the practitioner regarding overstepping the predefined time frame if the revised execution plan (207) cannot be executed within the predefined time frame based on detection of a similar past situation of overstepping the predefined time frame by the practitioner, generation of correct type of caution and learning from response of the practitioner and performing correction for the discarded one or more non- critical activities.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising continuous learning based on inputs of the practitioner, previously revised execution plan and time taken by the practitioner to execute the plurality of events.

9. A critical event managing system (101) for managing time-critical events associated with critical devices, comprising:
a processor (113); and
a memory (111) communicatively coupled to the processor (113), wherein the memory (111) stores processor instructions, which, on execution, causes the processor (113) to:
identify one or more time-critical events from a plurality of events based on predetermined factors related to the plurality of events, wherein the plurality of events are determined from a first procedural sequences (201) identified from at least one of procedural narration by a practitioner and stored protocol manual and wherein the predetermined factors comprises one of minimum and maximum time gap of the one or more missed events of the plurality of time-critical events, a time duration for executing an event and dependency among plurality of events.

determine at least one of, one or more missed and incorrect events from the identified one or more time-critical events, based on a comparison between reference and observed values associated with a plurality of parameters associated with the critical devices;
provide a revised execution plan (207) for the one or more missed and incorrect events iteratively, based on historical data, data provided by the practitioner, the first procedural sequences (201), and metadata associated with the plurality of parameters;
execute the one or more missed and incorrect events as second procedural sequences (209) within a predefined time frame based on the revised execution plan (207); and
combine outcome from the execution of the first procedural sequences (201) and the second procedural sequences (209) to manage the time-critical events associated with the critical devices.

10. The critical event managing system (101) as claimed in claim 9, wherein the processor (113):
queries the practitioner handling the critical devices to check if the missed event of the plurality of events is critical and depends on any other events in past;
executes subsequent events from the first procedural sequences (201) on identifying a match between the reference and the observed value on comparison while determining the at least one or more missed and incorrect events;
delays generation of the revised execution plan (207) for a specific time period within the predefined time frame to monitor whether values of the predetermined parameters come to a permitted range, without any changes in values of other predetermined parameters, on identifying a mismatch between the reference and observed values during comparison; and

alerts the practitioner regarding overstepping the predefined time frame if the revised execution plan (207) cannot be executed within the predefined time frame based on detection of a similar past situation of overstepping the predefined time frame by the practitioner.

Dated this 26th day of December, 2018

Madhusudan S.T
Of K&S Partners
Agent for the Applicant
IN/PA-1297
, Description:TECHNICAL FIELD
The present subject matter is related in general to systems executing time critical activities, more particularly, but not exclusively to a method and system for managing time-critical events associated with critical devices.