Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Optical Output Device And Method For Controlling An Optical Transmitter

Abstract: Since it is difficult to emit a control a IQ modulator emitting modulated lightwave according to QAM format without signal degradation of said emitted signal due to low frequency dither used for the control of said modulator a method for controlling an optical transmitter according to an exemplary aspect of the invention includes: generating a multilevel electrical signal by means of combining two or more binary electrical signals where said multilevel signal is used to drive the modulator of. adding a low frequency dither signal on several of the binary electrical signals wherein the phase of the added dither signal depends on the value of the binary signal to which it is added; tapping a portion of light after the modulator and generating a monitor signal from the tapped light; controlling the modulator according to the monitor signal.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
20 March 2014
Publication Number
11/2015
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMMUNICATION
Status
Email
Parent Application

Applicants

NEC CORPORATION
7 1 Shiba 5 chome Minato ku Tokyo 1088001

Inventors

1. LE TAILLANDIER DE GABORY Emmanuel
c/o NEC Corporation 7 1 Shiba 5 chome Minato ku Tokyo 1088001

Specification

Description
Title of Invention: OPTICAL OUTPUT DEVICE AND METHOD
FOR CONTOROLLING AN OPTICAL TRANSMITTER
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates generally to optical communication technologies and
more particularly to optical communication technologies based on multi-level
modulation formats, which code more than one binary bit per symbol.
Background Art
[0002] In order to optimize the investment in optical fiber links, it is desirable to increase the
capacity of said links. This can be achieved by increasing the Spectral Efficiency (SE)
of the signals transmitted on said links, namely by using more efficient modulation
formats for the transmitted information. This can be used in conjunction with
Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM). Optical communication systems with
transmission rates up to lOGb/s mainly utilize On Off Keying (OOK) for modulation,
where the information is coded on two amplitude levels of the lightwave signal.
Besides, higher capacity systems utilize the modulation scheme based on Quadrature
Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), which codes the information on four phase levels.
Therefore, two binary bits can be coded per transmitted symbol. This is illustrated in
the non patent literature 1 (NPL1). In this manner, the necessary bandwidth of the
optical spectrum required to transmit information is used more efficiently, enabling the
transmission of more information on a fixed bandwidth.
[0003] Another way to increase even more the spectral efficiency per transmitted channel,
and therefore the link capacity, is to use Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM),
where symbols are coded on phase and amplitude levels, and are organized as a com
bination of multi-level amplitudes in quadrature phase. An example of QAM system is
disclosed in the non patent literature 2 (NPL2). In NPL2, the modulation format is
16QAM, where the information is coded into 16 levels, that is, 4 binary bits per
symbol. This enables to increase the spectral efficiency as compared to QPSK.
[0004] Information in QAM format can be modulated with an optical IQ modulator (In
phase - Quadrature phase modulator), sometimes called Cartesian modulator, vector
modulator, Dual Parallel modulator or nested modulator depending on the sources. In
an IQ modulator, the electric signals drive two independent Mach-Zehnder devices,
which can be called children Mach-Zehnder Modulators (MZM), or nested MZM
depending on the sources. The children MZM modulate the phase and amplitude of the
same optical carrier wave. The phase in one of their outputs is relatively delayed by 90
degrees before being recombined. The phase delay between the outputs of the children
MZM can be called an angle of quadrature and is ideally 90 degrees, modulo 180
degrees. Such IQ modulators are used in NPL2 for QAM format and also used in
NPL1 for QPSK modulation. Such IQ modulators offer an efficient and proven way to
perform QAM format.
[0005] More specifically for QAM format, the electrical signals used to drive the IQ
modulators are multilevel signals, as opposed to binary signals used for QPSK
modulation, such as in NPL1. For instance in NPL2, said multilevel signals are 4 level
signals, whose symbols are generated by two binary bits of independent data lanes. In
the case of NPL2, two bits, the Most Significant Bit (MSB) and the Least Significant
Bit (LSB) are combined by a scheme, which is called by some sources as Power
Digital to Analog Converter (DAC). The scheme of power DAC is detailed in non
patent literature 3 (NPL3) for two binary bits combined in a 4 level signal. The LSB
signal is attenuated, when compared to the MSB with an attenuator and both signals
are added with a power divider used as a power combiner. By extension, higher indices
QAM format can be obtained with power DAC generating multilevel electrical driving
signals with higher level count. For instance, in non patent literature 4 (NPL4),
64QAM is generated with a Power DAC, and 64QAM signal allows higher spectral e f
ficiency. The Power DAC used in NPL4 is described in non patent literature (NPL5)
and has the same functions of the Power DAC used in NPL3, with the addition of
binary signal regeneration, DC offset and active amplification. In the Power DAC of
NPL5, the amplitudes of the three binary signals are adjusted so that after combining
said binary signal, a 8-level signal is produced with proper level voltages. Power DAC
can be made of discrete RF (Radio Frequency) components, such as NPL3, or can be
integrated onto a single chip, as NPL5. The advantage of Power DAC over other
schemes used to generate QAM is that they are made with available and proven
components and technology, enabling lower costs and better reliability as well as
sooner availability, and require less power consumption.
[0006] Besides, it is known that there is a drift of DC (Direct Current) bias in IQ modulators
due to variation of the temperature or ageing of the device. There are three types of
affected biases, that is, the DC biases of each of the two children MZM and DC bias
used to set the angle at quadrature. This is already known about QPSK modulation and
also known about QAM format if it uses a modulator having the same structure. Drifts
in biases result in incorrectly setting the modulator, which causes a degradation of the
transmitted signal, and therefore results in degradation of the received signal quality or
in worst cases the impossibility to decode the received signal. This problem is likely to
be revealed in the characterization tests of the modulator at the production stage or at
the assembly stage of the transmitter in which it is used, and when the modulator is
used. This problem is solved for OOK, Phase Shift Keying (PSK) modulation and
QPSK by using Auto Bias Control (ABC) circuits, which controls the biases of the
modulators and to compensate for the DC bias change. In this manner, ABC
technology can manage the drift of DC bias drift of IQ modulators, enabling correct
modulation and optimal
[0007] For instance, patent literature 1 (PTL1) discloses a transmitter, which comprises an
ABC scheme, which can control biases of an IQ modulator, which emits optical signal
modulated with QPSK or even QAM format. The control mechanism of the ABC
circuit relies on a low frequency dither or dither signal imprinted onto the DC bias to
be controlled or onto the electrical signal driving the IQ modulator. Such methods
relying on low frequency dither signals for ABC control are cost and size effective and
have proven efficiency for modulation formats up to QPSK.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0008] PTL 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2008-249848
Non Patent Literature
[0009] NPL 1: L. Nelson et al., "Capabilities of Real-Time Digital Coherent Transceivers",
European Conference on Optical Communications (paper MolC5, 2010).
NPL 2: P. Winzer et al., "Generation and 1,200-km Transmission of 448-Gb/s ETDM
56-Gbaud PDM 16-QAM using a Single VQ Modulator", (ECOC 2010, PD2.2).
NPL 3: P. Winzer et al., "Spectrally Efficient Long-Haul Optical Networking Using
112-Gb/s Polarization-Multiplexed 16-QAM", (Journal of Lightwave Technology,
Vol. 28, NO. 4, February 15, 2010, p547)
NPL 4: A.H. Gnauck et al., "Generation and Transmission of 21.4 Gbaud PDM
64QAM Using a High-Power DAC Driving a Single VQ Modulator", OFC201 1,
PDPB2
NPL 5: A. Konczykowska et al., "42GBd 3-bit power-DAC for optical commu
nications with advanced modulation formats in InP DHBT", Electronics Letters 17th
March 2011 Vol. 47 No. 6
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0010] However, in the case of QAM format, data is generated by the IQ modulator when
the driving voltages of the children MZM are either near the top of the transmission
curve of the MZM, with a near zero slope (near null differential value) or either in
areas with high slope (high differential value) located between the top and bottom of
the transmission curve of the child MZM. In the case where the driving voltage is in
the high slope area, a low frequency dither signal will cause a much higher variation of
amplitude and phase of the emitted symbol, than it would cause when the voltage is in
the near the top of the transmission curve. Such variation cause degradation in the
signal quality, as the emitted signal is deviated from the ideal symbol. Consequently,
this will result in degradation of the quality of the received signal. Alternatively,
reducing the amplitude of the low frequency dither signal used for ABC control would
only result in a reduction of the monitor signal used to control ABC and in con
sequence in the loss of precision of the ABC control, causing further degradation of the
emitted signal. Therefore, as QAM modulation uses MZM driven at areas of their
transmission curve with different slopes, low frequency dither signals used for con
trolling modulator used to modulate QAM format cause additional signal degradations
when compared to the case of QPSK modulation format. Therefore there is a need for
improvement quality of QAM signal modulated with an IQ modulator controlled by
ABC.
[001 1] The object of the invention is to provide an optical transmitter, a device, and a
method of controlling an optical transmitter that improve quality of QAM signal .
Solution to Problem
[0012] According to the present invention, there is provided an optical output device
comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals and adding a
dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower than the bit rate of said binary electrical
signals, on said two or more binary electrical signals,
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical signals;
a modulating unit of modulating an optical signal by using said two or more binary
electrical signals.
[0013] According to the present invention, there is provided an optical module comprising:
an optical input device generating a electric signal from an inputted optical signal,
and
an optical output device generating a outputted optical signal,
said optical output device further comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals and adding a
dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower than the bit rate of said binary electrical
signals, on said two or more binary electrical signals,
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical signals;
a modulating unit of modulating said outputted optical signal by using said two or
more binary electrical signals.
[0014] According to the present invention, there is provided a device generating a multilevel
electrical signal, comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals;
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical signals;
an adding unit of adding a dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower than the bit rate
of said binary electrical signals, on said two or more binary electrical signals, wherein
the phase of said dither electrical signal depends on the value of said binary signal to
which it is added;
the phase of said dither electrical signal is susceptible to change for each bit of said
binary signal.
[0015] According to the present invention, there is provided a method for controlling an
optical transmitter, comprising:
generating a multilevel electrical signal by means of combining two or more binary
electrical signals, where said multilevel electrical signal is used to drive a modulator of
said transmitter, and adding a dither signal of frequency f, lower than the bit rate of
said binary electrical signals, on two or more of said binary electrical signals,
modulating a optical signal by using said two or more binary electrical signals.
Advantageous Effect of Invention
[0016] By this invention, an optical transmitter, a device, and a method of controlling an
optical transmitter that improve quality of QAM signal is provided.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0017] [fig.l]Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an optical transmitter including an IQ
modulator controlled with an ABC circuit.
[fig.2]Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a power DAC used in the transmitter of
FIG. 1.
[fig.3A]Figure 3A is an eye diagram of the binary electrical waveform used to generate
a multilevel signal according to the power DAC of FIG. 2.
[fig.3B]Figure 3B is an eye diagram of the multilevel signal generated by the power
DAC of FIG. 2.
[fig.3C]FIG. 3C is a curve representing the transmission characteristics of a MZM used
in the transmitter of FIG. 1.
[fig.3D]FIG. 3D is a constellation map of the lightwave signal generated by the
transmitter of FIG. 1 in different conditions
[fig.3E]FIG. 3E is a constellation map of the lightwave signal generated by the
transmitter of FIG. 1 in different conditions.
[fig.3F]FIG. 3F is a histogram summarizing the quality of the signal mapped on FIG.
3D and FIG 3E.
[fig.3G]FIG.3G is plot of a four level electrical signal combine with a low frequency
dither signal.
[fig.4]Figure 4 is a schematic representation of an optical transmitter according to the
first exemplary embodiment of the invention.
[fig.5]Figure 5 is a schematic representation of a power DAC according to the first
exemplary embodiment of the invention.
[fig.6]Figure 6 is a schematic representation of a circuit used by the power DAC of
FIG. 5.
[fig.7]Figure 7 is another schematic representation of a circuit used by the power DAC
of FIG. 5.
[fig.8]Figure 8 is a schematic representation of a circuit used by the power DAC of
FIG. 5.
[fig.9A]FIG. 9A is a waveform chart of the multilevel signal generated by the power
DAC of FIG. 5.
[fig.9B]FIG. 9B is a waveform chart of the multilevel signal generated by the power
DAC of FIG. 5.
[fig.9C]FIG. 9C is a waveform chart of the monitor signal used in the transmitter of
FIG. 4.
[fig.9D]FIG. 9D is a constellation map of the lightwave signal generated by the
transmitter of FIG. 4 for the respective signals of FIG. 9A.
[fig.9E]FIG. 9E is a constellation map of the lightwave signal generated by the
transmitter of FIG. 4 for the respective signals of FIG. 9B.
[fig.9F]FIG. 9F is a histogram summarizing the quality of the signal mapped on FIG.
9D and FIG 9E.
[fig. 10]Figure 10 is a schematic representation of a transmitter according to another
exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
[fig. 11]Figure 11 is a waveform chart of the monitor signal used in the transmitter of
FIG. 10.
[fig. 12]Figure 12 is a schematic representation of a transponder according to another
exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
[fig.l3]Figure 13 is a waveform chart of the monitor signals used in the transmitter of
FIG. 12.
[fig. 14]Figure 14 is a schematic representation of a power DAC used to generate
multilevel signals according to the invention.
[fig.l5]Figure 15 is a schematic representation of a transponder according to another
exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
[fig. 16A]FIG. 16A is a waveform chart of the multilevel signal generated by the power
DAC of FIG. 14 within the transponder of FIG. 15.
[fig.l6B]FIG. 16B is a waveform chart of the multilevel signal generated by the power
DAC of FIG. 14 within the transponder of FIG. 15.
[fig.l6C]FIG. 16C is a histogram summarizing the quality of the signal generated from
FIG. 16A and FIG. 16B.
[fig. 17]Figure 17 is a waveform chart of the output signal of the circuit of FIG. 6.
Description of Embodiments
[0018] (Base technology of embodiments)
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an optical transmitter 100 including an IQ
modulator 110 and an ABC (Auto Bias Control) circuit 120. The optical transmitter
100 represented on FIG. 1 emits a lightwave signal 199 modulated according to the
16QAM format by the IQ modulator 110 according to a logical binary data stream 198.
A serializer-deserializer 101 generates two binary signals for the I components and two
others for the Q components of the IQ modulator 110. The power DAC (Digital
Analog Converter) 102 transforms the two binary signals coming from serializer-de
serializer 101 into a 4-level signal, which is amplified by the driver 104, so that its
amplitude is optimal for the I child Mach-Zehnder Modulators (MZM) 111 of the IQ
modulator 110. Identically, the power DAC 103 generates a 4-level signal from the
two binary signals generated by 101. The 4-level signal emitted by the power DAC
103 is amplified by the driver 105 to drive the Q child MZM 112 of the modulator 110.
A laser 106 emits Continuous Wave (CW) light, which is modulated by the IQ
modulator 110 according to the driving signals generated by the power DAC 102 and
103 and respectively amplified by the drivers 104 and 105.
[0019] The IQ modulator 110 includes two child MZM 111 and 112 which are used for I
component and Q component, respectively. The IQ modulator 110 also includes a
phase shifting element 113 and an integrated monitor Photo-Detector (PD) 114. The
phase shifting element 113 enables to control the angle of the quadrature in the IQ
modulator 110. The monitor PD 114 generates an electrical signal proportional to the
intensity of the modulated light signal and can be used to monitor the conditions of the
IQ modulator 110.
[0020] The ABC circuit 120 controls DC biases of the children MZM 111 and 112, as well
as the bias controlling the angle of the quadrature through the phase shifting element
113, according to the monitor signal provided by the monitor PD 114. The ABC circuit
120 uses the dithers generated by oscillators 131, 132 and 133, which generate sine
signals at the respective independent frequencies fl, f2 and f3, to control the biases of
the I child MZM 111, the Q child MZM 112 and the phase shifting element 113, r e
spectively. These frequencies can be in a range from a few tens of hertz to a few
megahertz. The monitor signal generated by the monitor PD 114 is amplified by an
amplifier 121 and is subsequently split by a divider 122 into three equal signals.
[0021] A control circuit 140 generates the DC bias for the Ichild MZM 111 according to the
output of the divider 122 and the sine voltage at the frequency f1 generated by the oscillator
131. A band pass filter 141 has a central frequency f l and a bandwidth narrow
enough to eliminate other frequency components at f2 and f3. The amplitude of the
output of the band pass filter 141 is proportional to the frequency component at f l of
the monitor signal generated by the monitor PD 114. A phase comparator 142
generates an error signal proportional to the amplitude of the output of the band pass
filter 141 and to the phase difference between the signal extracted by the band pass
filter 141 around f l and the sine signal at f l generated by the oscillator 131. A bias
circuit 143 generates a DC voltage to control the bias of the I-child MZM 111 in order
to minimize the error signal generated by the phase comparator 142 and having a dither
component at the frequency fl.
[0022] Another control circuit 150 is identical to the control circuit 140 and has a band pass
filter with a central frequency f2. The control circuit 150 controls the DC bias of the Qchild
MZM 112 according to the output of the divider 122 proportional to the monitor
signal generated by the monitor PD 114, in the same manner as the control circuit 140.
[0023] The third output of the divider 122 is fed to an envelope detector 160, whose outputs
are filtered by a band pass filter 161 with a central frequency f3. The output of the
envelope detector 160 generates a signal reflecting RF power spectrum of the monitor
signal generated by the monitor PD 114. A locking circuit 162 generates an error
signal proportional to the output of the band pass filter 161 using the dither frequency
f3. Finally, an angular bias circuit 163 generates a voltage minimizing the error signal
generated by the locking circuit 162 and having a dither frequency f3. The voltage
generated by the angular bias circuit 163 controls the angle of the quadrature of the IQ
modulator 110 through the phase shifting element 113.
[0024] FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a power DAC noted 200, which can be used
for the power DAC 102 and 103 of the transmitter 100 of FIG. 1. The power DAC 200
has two inputs 201 and 202, respectively the MSB and the LSB, which are two binary
electrical signals. The output 203 of the power DAC 200 is a multilevel electrical
signal. In this case, the power DAC 200 is a 2 bit DAC, therefore output 203 is a
4-level signal. 210 is an attenuator, which reduces the amplitude of the signal 202.
Typically the attenuation of attenuator 210 is between 4dB and 6dB, but other values
are applicable. The amplifiers 220 and 230 amplify the binary signals and also avoid
reflections from the power divider 240, which improves the quality of the generated
output 203.220 and 230 are not necessary to the functionality of 200 but they improve
the performance of 200. The power divider 240 is composed of three resistors, 241,
242 and 243. The power divider 240 is used in a combiner scheme, where two binary
electrical signals are combined into the output signal 203. As the two binary inputs of
240 have different amplitudes, the output 203 has four levels. The four levels of 203
can be set through the choice of the value of the attenuator 210 and through the gain of
the amplifiers 220 and 230.
[0025] FIG. 3 is a collection of simulation result for the optical transmitter 100 of FIG. 1 for
32Gbaud 16QAM optical signal. The transmitter uses the power DAC 200 of FIG. 2
for the devices 102 and 103. The attenuator 210 of the power DAC 200(102 and 103)
is set to 4.5dB. FIG. 3A is the eye diagram of the electrical outputs of the serializerdeserializer
101. The binary signal plotted on FIG. 3A is applied to the inputs of the
power DAC 200. FIG. 3B is the eye diagram of the output of the power DAC 200(102
and 103). The signal of FIG. 3B has four levels, which consists in the combinations of
the two levels of the MSL and LSB inputs of power DAC 200(102 and 103).
[0026] FIG. 3C is the transmission curve of a MZM used as child MZM 111 and 112 of the
IQ modulator 110. The abscissa represents the input voltage normalized by Vpi, where
Vpi is the voltage difference between conditions for constructive interference and de
structives interferences of the MZM. The points 301 and 305 represent the constructive
interference points (maximum transmission) and have a difference of phase of 180
degrees. The point 303 corresponds to the destructive interference point of the MZM.
When used in the IQ modulator 110 of the transmitter 100, the child MZM 111 and
112 are DC biased so that the central voltage is located at Vpi and is driven with
electrical signals of amplitude equal to twice Vpi. When the child MZM 111 and 112of
110 are driven by a multilevel signal plotted on FIG. 3B after proper amplification by
drivers 104 and 105, the four levels correspond to the points 301, 302, 304 and 305 on
the curve of FIG. 3C.
[0027] First, on FIG. 3D, the ABC circuit 120 of the optical transmitter 100 is turned off, as
well as the low frequency dither signal generators 131, 132 and 133. The DC biases of
the IQ modulators are ideally set, i.e. the child MZM 111 and 112 are set at Vpi and
the quadrature phase is set at 90 degrees. The constellation map of FIG. 3D is
measured immediately after ideal setting, as the characteristics of the modulated signal
would deteriorate within few tens of minutes due to drift of the three DC biases of the
IQ modulator 110 because of change in temperature of the optical transmitter 100. The
plotted points are chosen at the center of the optical symbols. The 16 symbols of
16QAM signal are noted with consecutive numerals from 310 to 325, with attribution
chosen for convention only, with no relation to the coding and mapping operated
between the binary data stream 198 and the emitted signal 199. For the symbols 310,
314, 318 and 322, the child MZM 111 of the IQ modulator 110 is driven by electrical
symbols reaching the point 301 of the transmission curve. For the symbols 311, 315,
319 and 323, the child MZM 111 is driven by electrical symbols reaching the point 302
of the transmission curve. For the symbols 312, 316, 320 and 324, the child MZM 111
is driven by electrical symbols reaching the point 304 of the transmission curve. For
the symbols 313, 317, 321 and 325, the child MZM 111 is driven by electrical symbols
reaching the point 305 of the transmission curve. On the quadrature phase side, for the
symbols 310, 3 11, 312 and 313, the child MZM 112 of the IQ modulator 110 is driven
by electrical symbols reaching the point 301 of the transmission curve. For the symbols
314, 315, 316 and 317, the child MZM 112 is driven by electrical symbols reaching the
point 302 of the transmission curve. For the symbols 318, 319, 320 and 321, the child
MZM 112 is driven by electrical symbols reaching the point 304 of the transmission
curve. For the symbols 322, 323, 324 and 325, the child MZM 112 is driven by
electrical symbols reaching the point 305 of the transmission curve. On the con
stellation map of FIG. 3D, the symbols are very close to the ideal points of the con
stellation, which is expected from a transmitter with good characteristics. It is expected
that the ABC circuit 120 should preserve this signal quality.
[0028] Then, on FIG. 3E, the ABC circuit 120 as well as low frequency dither signal
generators 131, 132 and 133 is turned on and the ABC circuit 120 ensures that the DC
biases of the ABC circuit 120 are maintained in the optimal conditions, which were set
manually on FIG. 3D. For direct comparison reason, the symbols of the constellation
map of FIG. 3E are noted with the same numerals as the ones of FIG. 3D. It can be
observed that the symbols of FIG. 3E are spread due to the use of low frequency dither
signals of the ABC circuit 120. This means a degradation of the emitted signal quality,
resulting in a degradation of the received signal and additional errors. Alternatively,
the distance between symbols on the constellation of FIG. 3E will be reduced, which
means lower tolerance to noise and distortions of the emitted signal. The symbols 311,
312, 315, 316, 319, 320, 323 and 324 are affected by the low frequency dither signal
applied on the DC bias of the I child MZM 111. In the same manner, symbols 314,
315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320 and 321 are affected by the low frequency dither signal
applied to the DC bias of the Q child MZM 112. It can be understood that the low
frequency dither signal dither will degrade the quality of the symbols emitted when the
child MZM 111 and 112 when they electrical signal is in the high slope area of the
transmission curve of FIG. 3C. This problem is specific to QAM modulation, as QPSK
modulation does not use these points.
[0029] FIG. 3F quantifies and summarizes the signal quality of the constellation maps of
FIG. 3D and FIG. 3E by symbol with Error Vector Magnitude. Error Vector magnitude
represents the difference between the ideal constellation symbol and the emitted
symbol. It is defined as follows.
[0030]
(1)
[0031] where S de i is the ideal point on constellation map and Smeasured is the point emitted by
the transmitter. Whereas the ABC circuit 120 is supposed to preserve the emitted
signal quality despite DC bias voltage drifts, it causes additional penalty for QAM
modulation when the signals are generated with points in the high slope area of the
transmission curve of the transmission curve.
[0032] Alternatively, the low frequency dither signal f l and f2 emitted by generators 131
and 132 is combined to the I and Q electrical data driving the IQ modulator 110,
instead of being applied to the DC biases of the child MZM 111 and 112. A four level
electrical signal combine with a low frequency dither signal is plot on FIG. 3G. The
levels 330, 331, 332 and 333 represent the four levels with the dither signal imprinted
on them. For identical dither signal frequency and amplitudes, the obtained signal con
stellation is identical to FIG. 3E.
First Exemplary Embodiment
[0033] FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of an optical transmitter 400 including an IQ
modulator 410 and an Auto Bias Control (ABC) circuit 420. The optical transmitter
400 represented on FIG. 4 emits a lightwave signal 499 modulated according to the
16QAM format by the IQ modulator 410 according to a logical binary data stream 498.
The serializer-deserializer 401 is identical to the serializer-deserializer 101 of FIG. 1.
The power DAC 402 transforms the two binary signals coming from 401 into a fourlevel
signal, which is amplified by the driver 404, so that its amplitude is optimal for
the IQ modulator 410. Identically, the power DAC 403 generates a 4-level signal from
the two binary signals generated by the serializer-deserializer 401. Moreover, the
power DAC 402 and 403 imprints low frequency dither signals on their output
multilevel electrical signals, according to the low frequency dither signals generated by
the generators 431 and 432 of the ABC circuit 420. The driver amplifiers 404 and 405
are identical to the drivers 104 and 105 of FIG. 1. A laser 406 emits Continuous Wave
(CW) light, which is modulated by the IQ modulator 410 according to the driving
signals generated by the power DAC 402 and 403 and respectively amplified by the
drivers 404 and 405. The IQ modulator 410 is identical to the driver 110 of FIG. 1.
[0034] The ABC circuit 420 controls DC biases of the child MZM of the IQ modulator 410
as well as the bias controlling the angle of the quadrature of 410, according to the
monitor signal provided by the monitor PD integrated in the IQ modulator
410.Alternatively, a PD external to the IQ modulator 410, which receives a portion of
light tapped from the lightwave signal 499 can be used to generate the monitor signal
for the ABC circuit 420. The ABC circuit 420 uses the dithers generated by oscillators
431, 432 and 433, which generate sine signals at the respective frequencies fl, f2 and
f3. The dither signals of frequencies f l and f2 are used by the power DAC 402 and
403; the dither signal of frequency f3 is used to control the angle of quadrature of the
IQ modulator 410. These frequencies can be in a range from a few tens of hertz to a
few megahertz. The amplifiers 421 and the divider 422 are identical to 121 and 122 of
FIG. 1.
[0035] A control circuit 440 generates the DC bias for the I child MZM 111 according to the
output of the divider 422, filtered through the band pass filter 441. The band pass filter
441 has a central frequency f 1 and a bandwidth narrow enough to eliminate other fre
quencies different from f 1. The amplitude of the output of the band pass filter 441 is
proportional to the frequency component at f1 of the monitor signal used by the ABC
circuit 420. The circuit 442 generates an error signal proportional to the amplitude of
the output of the band pass filter 441 and to the phase difference between the signal
extracted by the band pass filter 441 around f 1 and the sine signal at f 1 generated by
the oscillator 431. A bias circuit 443 generates a DC voltage to control the bias of the I
child MZM 111 in order to minimize the error signal generated by the circuit 442. The
DC bias generated by 443 does not contain any low frequency dither signal.
[0036] Another control circuit 450 is identical to the control circuit 440 and has a band pass
filter with a central frequency f2. The control circuit 450 controls the DC bias of the Q
child MZM of 410 according to the output of the divider 422 proportional to the
monitor signal used by the ABC circuit 420, in the same manner as the control circuit
440.
[0037] The low frequency generator 433 is identical to the oscillator 133 of FIG. 1. The
control circuit 460 contains an envelope detector similar to the envelope detector 160,
a band pass filter centered on f3 similar to the band pass filter 161, a locking circuit
similar to the locking circuit 162, and a DC bias generator identical to the angular bias
circuit 163 of FIG. 1. The voltage generated by the control circuit 460 controls the
angle of the quadrature of the IQ modulator 110.
[0038] FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a power DAC noted 500 used in the first em
bodiment of the present invention. The power DAC 500 can be used for the devices
402 and 403 of the transmitter 400 of FIG. 4. The power DAC 500 has two inputs 501
and 502, respectively the MSB and the LSB, which are two binary electrical signals.
The output 503 of the power DAC 500 is a multilevel electrical signal. In this case, the
power DAC 500 is a 2 bit DAC, therefore the outpot 503 is a 4-level signal. 510 is an
attenuator, identical to the attenuator 210 of the power DAC 200 of FIG. 2. The am
plifiers 520 and 530 amplify the binary signals and also avoid reflections from the
power divider 540, which improves the quality of the generated output 503. A low
frequency sine wave 504 is provided to the amplifiers 520 and 530 through the divider
550. The amplifiers 520 and 530 imprint a the low frequency dither signal coming
from the divider 504 on their output RF signal. In addition, the phase of the imprinted
dither signal depends on the level of the binary input of the amplifiers 520 and 530. Al
ternatively, the polarity of the imprinted dither signal depends on the level of the
binary input of the amplifiers 520 and 530. The power combiner 540 is used to
combine the two binary electrical signals output by the amplifiers 520 and 530 into the
output signal 503. The power combiner 540 can be made of a power divider similar to
the power divider 240. As the two binary inputs of the power divider 540 have
different amplitudes, the output 503 has four levels. The 4 levels of the output 503 can
be set through the choice of the value of the attenuator 510 and through the gain of the
amplifiers 520 and 530. Moreover, as the outputs of the amplifiers 520 and 530 have a
low frequency dither signal which depends on the level of the amplified binary signals,
the output 503 also has a low frequency dither signal and this dither signal depends on
the level of the output 503.
[0039] The power DAC 500 can be made of discrete RF components. Alternatively, the
power DAC 500 can be made with an Integrated Circuit (IC) chip. Alternatively, the
input binary signal 502 can be amplified directly by the amplifier 520 and sequentially
attenuated by the attenuator 510, which corresponds to inversing the order of the at
tenuator 510 and of the amplifier 520; In this case, the power DAC 500 with in
inversed order of the attenuator 510 and the amplifier 520 is still applicable for the em
bodiment of the present invention.
[0040] In the optical transmitter 400 of FIG. 4, two power DAC similar to the power DAC
500 are used for the power DAC 402 and 403. The inputs of the power DAC 402 and
403 are two binary signals generated by 401. The power DAC 402 and 403 use re
spectively low frequency dither signals generated by the generators 431 and 432. The
dither signals are imprinted on the multilevel voltage driving the I and Q child MZM
of the IQ modulator 410. Therefore, frequency components at f l and f2 are monitored
by the internal PD of 410 and can be extracted by the ABC circuit 420, in order to
control the DC biases of the IQ modulator 410.
[0041] FIG. 6 is the schematic representation of an amplifier circuit 600, which can be used
for the amplifiers 520 and 530 used in the power DAC 500 of FIG. 5. The input signal
601 is a binary electrical signal with high frequency. The input 602 is a low frequency
sine signal. The input signal 601 passes through the condenser 620 and through the
amplifier 610. The amplifier 610 is biased with a Vd tension 609. The input 602 passes
through the condenser 622 and is added to the bias of the amplifier 610. The output of
the amplifier 610 passes through the condenser 621 and is output as the high speed
signal 603 from the circuit 600. The high speed signal 603 is the amplified signal from
the high speed input 601. However, due to the circuit 600, the high speed signal 603
has a low frequency dither signal with same low frequency as the input 602. Moreover,
when the input 601 is high, the added dither signal value is the opposite (opposite
amplitude is equivalent to opposite phase here) as when the input 601 is low.
Therefore, the high speed signal 603 is a binary electrical signal with a low frequency
dither signal, whose phase depends on the level of the input high speed signal 601.
[0042] FIG. 7 is the schematic representation of another amplifier circuit 700, which can be
used for the amplifiers 520 and 530 used in the power DAC 500 of FIG. 5. The input
signal 701 is a binary electrical signal with high frequency. The input 702 is a low
frequency sine signal. The input 702 passes through the Field Effect transistor (FET)
710 biased with the resistor 730. The output signal 703 is emitted by the FET 710. The
input signal 701 passes through the FET 711 biased with the tensions 708 and 709 and
the resistor 731. The output signal 703 is the amplified signal from the high speed
input 701. However, due to the circuit 700, the output signal 703 has a low frequency
dither signal with same low frequency as 702. Moreover, when the high speed signal
701 is high, the added dither signal value is the opposite (opposite amplitude is
equivalent to opposite phase here) as when the high speed signal 701 is low. Therefore,
the output signal 703 is a binary electrical signal with a low frequency dither signal,
whose phase depends on the level of the input high speed signal 701.
[0043] FIG. 8 is the schematic representation of another amplifier circuit 800, which can be
used for the amplifiers 520 and 530 used in the power DAC 500 of FIG. 5. The circuit
800 is differential, therefore it enables differential design for the power DAC 500 and
the optical transmitter 400 of FIG. 4. The input signals 801 and 802 are respectively
positive and negative binary electrical signals with high frequency. The input 803 is a
low frequency sine signal. The input 803 passes through the transistor 812 biased with
the voltage 809. The positive and negative output signals 804 and 805 are emitted by
the transistors 810 and 811. The input signals 801 and 802 pass through the transistors
810 and 811 biased with resistors 830 and 831. The output signals 804 and 805 are the
amplified signals from the high speed inputs 801 and 802. However, due to the circuit
800, the output signals 804 and 805 have a low frequency dither signals with same low
frequency as the input 803. Moreover, when the input signals 801 or 802 are high, the
added dither signal value is the opposite (opposite amplitude is equivalent to opposite
phase here) as when the input signals 801 or 802 are low respectively. Therefore, the
output signals 804 and 805 are binary electrical signals with low frequency dither
signals, whose phase depends on the level of the input high speed signals 801 and 802.
[0044] FIG. 17 is a waveform chart of the output signal 603 of the circuit 600 of FIG. 6 used
in the power DAC 500 of FIG. 5. The two levels of the signal 603 are noted 1701 and
1702 on FIG. 17. The level 1701 is a high level and it corresponds to bits where the
level of the input signal 601 is also high. The level 1702 is a low level and corresponds
to bits where the level of the input signal 601 is also high. Both levels 1701 and 1702
are binary levels but they also feature a low frequency dither, which frequency is equal
to the frequency of the input low frequency clock signal 602 of FIG. 6. However,
according to the circuit of FIG. 6, the phase of the low frequency component imprinted
on the level 1701 is opposite (difference of 180 degree) to the phase of the low
frequency component of the level 1702, as binary bits near peaks of the low frequency
component of the level 1701 are concomitant with binary bits near bottoms of the low
frequency component of the level 1702. Another and equivalent way to describe this is
to notice that the amplitude sign of the low frequency component imprinted on the
level 1701 is of opposite sign of the low frequency component imprinted on the level
1702.
[0045] FIG. 9 is a collection of simulation result for the optical transmitter 400 of FIG. 4 for
32Gbaud 16QAM optical signal. The transmitter uses the power DAC 500 of FIG. 5
for the power DAC 402 and 403. The attenuator 510 of the power DAC 500 is set to
4.5dB. The amplifiers 520 and 530 of the power DAC 500 are based on the amplifiers
700 of FIG. 7.
[0046] FIG. 9A is waveform chart of the output of the power DAC 402 in the transmitter
400 of FIG. 4. The four output level of the DAC 500 are noted as 900, 901, 902 and
903. On the levels 900 and 903, the levels of the MSB and LSB of 500 are equals, r e
spectively 0 and 1 and the low frequency dither signal is imposed on the output signal.
Noticeably, as the phase of the dither signal imposed on each binary signal is
dependant on the level of the binary signal, the phase of the dither signal level present
on the levels 900 and 903 have phase differences of 180 degrees. On the levels 901 and
902, the MSB and LSB are opposed (respectively 0 / 1 and 1 / 0), therefore the
resulting dither signal present on the output of 500 is the sum of two dither signals of
same frequency but opposite phases. Therefore, the resulting dither signal will have a
lower amplitude. In the case of FIG. 9A, the amplitude of the low frequency dither
signal on levels 901 and 902 is lower than for the levels 900 and 903. As the
degradation of the signal emitted from the transmitter results from the levels corre
sponding to the high slope region of the child MZM used in the transmitter, the penalty
will be reduced with the transmitter implementing the present invention.
[0047] FIG. 9B is waveform chart of the output of the power DAC 402 in the transmitter
400 of FIG. 4 for a different signal adjustment configuration. The four output level of
the DAC 500 are noted as 910, 9 11, 912 and 913. On the levels 910 and 913, the levels
of the MSB and LSB of 500 are equals, respectively 0 and 1 and the low frequency
dither signal is imposed on the output signal. Again, as the phase of the dither signal
imposed on each binary signal is dependant on the level of the binary signal, the phase
of the dither signal level present on 910 and 913 have phase differences of 180
degrees. On the levels 911 and 912, the MSB and LSB are opposed (respectively 0 / 1
and 1 / 0), therefore the resulting dither signal present on the output of the power DAC
500 is the sum of two dither signals of same frequency but opposite phases. In this
configuration, the gain of the amplifiers 520 and 530 as well as the amplitude of the
low frequency dither signals at the output of the divider 550 has been adjusted so that
the resulting dither signals at the output of the amplifiers 920 and 930 balance each
other. Therefore, the resulting dither signals have an amplitude equal to zero, so they
are no longer present on levels 912 and 913. Again, the penalty will be reduced with
the transmitter implementing the present invention in the dither signal balancing con
figuration.
[0048] FIG. 9C is the characteristics curve of the output of the band pass filter 441 of FIG.
4. The abscissa represents the difference between the DC bias applied to the child I
MZM of the modulator 410 and the optimal DC bias, represented as point 303 on FIG.
3C. The curves of FIG 9C are normalized on the abscissa by the value Vpi of the
modulator and are limited to the range of - 1 to + 1 in virtue of the periodicity of the
characteristics of the MZM. The curve 920 represents the amplitude of the output of
the band pass filter 441 and the curve 921 represents the phase of the output of the
band pass filter 441 the band pass filter when compared to the signal generated by the
low frequency dither signal generator 431. The low frequency dither signal has been
applied on the driving signal according to the power DAC 500, with waveform plot on
FIG. 9A. The amplitude characteristics has three maxima, one at the optimal value of
0, and two others at + 1 and -1. However, only the optimal value is in phase with the
signals generated by the low frequency dither signal generator 431, the other ones are
in opposite phase. Therefore, as the circuit 442 multiplies the amplitude by a
component proportional to the cosine of the signal phase, the overall maximum will be
the optimal point (Delta I =0). The two other maxima of the amplitude are minima of
the output of the circuit 442 as the phase is opposite. The circuit 443 generates a DC
component for the I child MZM of the modulator 410 in order to maximize the output
of the circuit 442. Therefore, in the present configuration, the ABC 420 controls the
DC bias of the I MZM of the modulator 410 so that it is in the optimal conditions. The
control circuit 450 controls the DC bias of the Q child MZM of the modulator 410 in
the same manner, with a frequency f2 different from fl. The control circuit 460
controls quadrature angle according to known methods, such as described in PTL1.
The modulator 410 is therefore controlled by the ABC 420 in the optimal conditions.
As the power DAC 500 reduces the amplitude of the low frequency dither signal for
cases where MSB and LSB are different, the penalty induced on signal 499 by the low
frequency dither signal will be reduced by the present invention.
[0049] In another aspect of the present invention, the output of the power DAC 402 is
plotted on FIG. 9B. Again, the modulator 410 is controlled by the ABC 420 in the
optimal conditions. As the power DAC 500 reduces the amplitude of the low frequency
dither signal for cases where MSB and LSB are different to null, the penalty induced
on signal 499 by the low frequency dither signal will be reduced by the present
invention.
[0050] First, on FIG. 9D, the ABC circuit 420 of 400 is turned on and the output of the
power DAC 402 and 403 is identical to FIG. 9A. For direct comparison reason, the
symbols of the constellation map of FIG. 9D are noted with the same numerals as the
ones of FIG. 3D, without any respect to the symbol mapping performed by transmitter
400. On the constellation map of FIG. 9D the symbols are very close to the ideal points
of the constellation. According to the present invention, the ABC circuit 420 preserves
this signal quality of transmitter 400.
[005 1] Then, on FIG. 9E, the ABC circuit 420 of 400 is turned on and the output of the
power DAC 402 and 403 is identical to FIG. 9B. For direct comparison reason, the
symbols of the constellation map of FIG. 9E are noted with the same numerals as the
ones of FIG. 3D and therefore FIG. 3D, without any respect to the symbol mapping
performed by transmitter 400. On the constellation map of FIG. 9E, the symbols are
very close to the ideal points of the constellation. According to the present invention,
the ABC circuit 420 preserves this signal quality of transmitter 400.
[0052] FIG. 9F quantifies with EVM and summarizes the signal quality of the constellation
maps of FIG. 9D and 9E, and compares it with the ideal constellation of FIG. 3D.
According to the present invention, the signal quality of the emitted signal 499 is
preserved, and almost no difference is can be noticed as for FIG. 9E with the optimal
conditions. The present invention enabled to restore signal quality that was degraded
by traditional method of FIG. 3E.
[0053] The present invention enables to control an IQ modulator, emitting a lightwave
signal modulated according to QAM format, with a low frequency dither signal and to
avoid the degradation of signal quality caused by said dither signal. Moreover, the im
plementation of the present invention is possible with simple off the shelf electronics,
therefore it is cost effective. The present invention can be implemented with little
footprint, therefore it is small sized.
Second Exemplary Embodiment
[0054] FIG. 10 is a schematic representation of an optical transmitter 1000, including an IQ
modulator 1010 and an Auto Bias Control (ABC) circuit 1020. The optical transmitter
1000 represented on FIG. 10 emits a lightwave signal 1099 modulated according to the
16QAM format by the IQ modulator 1010 according to a logical binary data stream
1098. The serializer-deserializer 1001 is identical to the serializer-deserializer 101 of
FIG. 1. The power DAC 1002 and 1003 are similar to the power DAC 402 and 403 of
FIG. 4. The amplifiers 1004 and 1005 are identical to the amplifiers 404 and 405 of
FIG. 4. The laser 1006 and the modulator 1010 are identical respectively to the laser
406 and the modulator 410 of FIG. 4.
[0055] The ABC circuit 1020 controls DC biases of the child MZM as well as the bias con
trolling the angle of the quadrature of the modulator 1010, according to the monitor
signal provided by the monitor PD integrated in the modulator 1010. The amplifier
1021 and the divider 1022 are respectively identical to the amplifier 421 and the
divider 422 of FIG. 4. A low frequency oscillator 1030 generates a low frequency, f,
sine wave, which is distributed by the ABC controller unit 1023. Alternatively, the low
frequency oscillator 1030 can be integrated within the ABC controller unit 1023. The
ABC controller unit 1023 can be realized with a microcontroller or a Digital Signal
Processing (DSP) unit. The low frequency sine wave is distributes by the ABC control
unit 1023 to the power DAC 1002 and 1003 in order to be imprinted on the driving
data for the modulator 1010 according to the schematics of FIG. 5. The low frequency
sine wave is also distributed to the control unit 1040 for control of the DC bias for the I
child MZM and to the control unit 1050 for the control of DC bias of the Q child
MZM. The control units 1040 and 1050 are similar to the control circuits 440 and 450
of FIG. 4 and have band pass filters centered around the frequency f . The control unit
1060 controls the DC bias changing the quadrature angle of the IQ modulator 1010.
The control unit 1060 has a band pass filter 1061 centered around the frequency f .
[0056] FIG. 11 is a curve representing the characteristics of the signal at the output of the
band pass filter 1061 of FIG. 10 against the angle of quadrature of the modulator 1010.
The curve of FIG. 11 has been simulated from the transmitter 1000 with a baud rate of
32Gbaud and an emitted signal as 16QAM. In a first implementation of the present
invention, the DC bias generator 1063 generates a voltage in order to maintain the
output of the band pass filter 1061 equal to 140mVpp, which corresponds to a
quadrature angle of 90 degrees modulo 180 degrees. Alternatively, the DC bias
generator 1063 generates a voltage in order to maintain the output of 1061 equal to
140mVpp with the condition of a positive slope around the control value, which cor
responds to a quadrature angle of 90 degrees modulo 360 degrees. In either imple
mentations, the angle of quadrature is optimally set and can be maintained in the
optimal condition in spite of drifts in the DC biases of the modulator 1010.
[0057] Finally, the working process of the ABC controller unit 1023 is explained. First,
during a duration Tl, the low frequency dither is distributed to the power DAC 1002,
generating the four level signal for the I MZM of the modulator 1010. During this
duration, the low frequency dither is not distributed to the Power DAC 1003.
Moreover, the feedback of the control units 1050 and 1060 are turned off, which means
that the DC bias generated by the control units 1050 and 1060 is kept constant. During
the duration Tl, the control unit 1040 generates a DC bias in order to maximize its
internal feedback signal, as explained with the transmitter 400 of FIG. 4. After the
duration Tl, the feedback of the control unit 1040 is turned off, which means that the
DC voltage generated by 1040 is kept constant. Then during the duration T2, the low
frequency dither is distributed to the power DAC 1003, generating the four level signal
for the Q MZM of the modulator 1010. During this duration, the low frequency dither
is not distributed to the Power DAC 1002. Moreover, the feedback of the control units
1040 and 1060 are turned off, which means that the DC bias generated by 1040 and
1060 is kept constant. During the duration T2, the control unit 1020 generates a DC
bias in order to maximize its internal feedback signal, as explained with the transmitter
400 of FIG. 4. After the duration T2, the feedback of the control unit 1050 is turned
off, which means that the DC voltage generated by the control unit 1050 is kept
constant. Then during the duration T3, the low frequency dither is distributed to the
power DAC 1002 and 1003. Moreover, the feedback of the control units 1040 and
1050 are turned off, which means that the DC bias generated by 1040 and 1050 is kept
constant. During the duration T3, the control unit 1063 generates a DC bias in order to
keep the output of the band pass filter 1061 according to the curve of FIG. 11. The
control unit 1023 produces cycles wherein each of the sequences the duration Tl, T2
and T3 are performed at least once.
[0058] Alternatively, the low frequency dither signal is distributed to both 1002 and 1003
during the duration Tl and T2, as well as the duration T3.
[0059] According to the present invention, the ABC circuit 1020 controls the three DC
biases of the IQ modulator 1010, which sets and maintains the IQ modulator 1010 in
the optimal conditions. Moreover, the QAM transmitter 1000 does not have additional
signal degradation due to the usage of low frequency dither signal to control the DC
biases of the modulator 1010.
[0060] The present invention enables to control an IQ modulator, emitting a lightwave
signal modulated according to QAM format, with a low frequency dither signal and to
avoid the degradation of signal quality caused by said dither signal. Moreover, the im
plementation of the present invention is possible with simple off the shelf electronics,
therefore it is cost effective. The present invention can be implemented with little
footprint, therefore it is small sized.
Third Exemplary Embodiment
[0061] FIG. 12 is a schematic representation of an optical transponder implementing the
present invention. The transponder 1200 is provided with an optical transmitter 1201,
which emits a lightwave signal 1291 accordingly to the data bit stream 1290 provided
to the transponder. 1200 also features an optical receiver 1202, which receives the
modulated lightwave signal 1292 and demodulates it to provide the data bit stream
1293. The transponder 1200 has a serializer-deserializer 1203, which reorganize the
stream 1290 to provide data to be modulated by the transmitter 1201. The serializerdeserializer
1203 also receives the data received by 1202 and serializes it into the bit
stream 1293. The serializer-deserializer 1203 can also perform coding, decoding and
error correction operations. The transmitter 1201 emits lightwave signal with
modulation format of polarization multiplexed (PM-) 16QAM and a baud rate of
32Gbaud, therefore a bit rate of 256Gb/s. In the same manner, the receiver 1202
receives 256Gb/s PM-16QAM signal.
[0062] The receiver 1202 features a coherent receiver 1250, which consists of a polarization
diversity 90 degree hybrid, four balanced detectors and subsequent linear amplifiers,
which are not detailed under the coherent receiver 1250. The coherent receiver 1250
mixes the received signal 1292 with the light of local oscillator 1251 in a coherent
detection scheme. The received signal from the coherent receiver 1250 is digitalized
with four analog to digital converters integrated in the DSP chip 1252. The DSP 1252
compensates for distortions and impairments encountered by the received signal 1292,
performs polarization demultiplexing, carrier phase and offset compensation and de
modulates the received signal.
[0063] The transmitter 1201 is equipped with a coder 1204, which generates 8 data lanes,
allocated to 2 bit coded the I and Q data channels of each X and Y polarization. 4
Power DAC 1205, 1206, 1207 and 1208 are identical to the devices described with 500
on FIG. 5. Each of them combines adds low frequency sine signal provided by the
ABC circuits 1220 and 1221 to two binary signals provided by 1204, with the phase of
the low frequency dither signal changing with respect to the level of the binary signal.
The two binary signal with imprinted low frequency dither signal are combined into a
four level electrical signal. The ABC circuits 1220 and 1221 are identical to the circuit
1020 of FIG. 10. The multilevel electrical signal is amplified with the drivers 1211,
1212, 1213 and 1214. These drivers feature a function of gain control and are adjusted
so that their output have an amplitude of 2*Vpi, where Vpi is defined from the p o
larization multiplexed IQ modulator 1210. The modulator 1210 includes two IQ
modulators similar to the modulator 1010 of FIG. 10, which modulate two lightwave
carriers tapped from the same input provided by the laser 1209, rotate one of the
lightwave signals and combine them in a polarization multiplexing scheme. The
modulator 1210 features two integrated PD, one for each polarization. The three DC
biases of the X polarization IQ modulator are controlled with the ABC circuit 1220 and
the three DC biases of the Y polarization IQ modulator are controlled with the ABC
circuit 1221. Moreover, according to the present invention, controlling the DC biases
based on a low frequency dither signal does not cause any degradation of the quality of
the signal 1291.
[0064] Furthermore, the amplitudes of the output signals of the drivers 1211, 1212, 1213 and
1214 are susceptible to vary depending on the ambient temperature or on the ageing of
the drivers. In order to avoid, additional signal degradation due to the change of the
output amplitude of the drivers, the gain of said driver is controlled by feedback,
relying on the present invention. The transmitter 1201 features two sorts of feedback to
control the gain of the drivers, one per polarization. Alternatively, a unique feedback
scheme may be implemented to control the gain of all drivers of all polarizations.
[0065] First, on the X polarization, the monitor signal provided by the integrated PD of the
modulator 1210 is split with the divider 1222. One of the output of 1222 is used by the
ABC circuit 1220. The other one passes through a band pass filter 1223 centered on the
low frequency f, which is equal to the low frequency generated by the ABC circuit
1220. The output of the band pass filter 1223 is split and each of the split output is
provided to identical gain control units 1224 and 1225. The output of the band pass
filter 1223 is plot on the characteristics curved 1301 of FIG. 13. The curve 1301 has a
maximum for the output voltage of the driver equal to 2*Vpi, which is the optimal
condition for the driving signal .According to this characteristics, the curve 1301, the
control units 1224 and 1225 controls the gain of the respective drivers 1211 and 1212
in order to maximize the output of the band pass filter 1223. It may be advantageous to
link the control units 1224 and 1225 as the use the same monitor signal, in order to
stop one of the units while one is optimizing the monitor signal, and stop the unit to
maximize the monitor signal with the other unit sequentially, repeating this cycle to
optimize the gain of the drivers 1211 and 1212 continuously. According to the present
invention, the gain of the drivers of the transmitter 1203 is controlled to the optimal
conditions using a low frequency dither signal, without causing any degradation to the
quality of the emitted signal.
[0066] Then, on the Y polarization, the output of the drivers 1213 and 1214 is respectively
tapped with the dividers 1230 and 1231. Alternatively, the divider 1230 and 1231 can
be integrated in the drivers 1213 and 1214 as a monitoring function. The tapped output
of the dividers 1230 and 1231 are filtered by the respective band pass filters 1232 and
1233 which are centered on the low frequency f, equal to the low frequency generated
by the ABC circuit 1221. The output of the band pass filter 1233 is plot by the curve
1302 of FIG. 13. As the curve 1302 varies monotonically with the output voltage of the
drivers, the control unit 1235 controls the gain of the driver 1214 in order to maintain
the monitor signal provided by the band pass filter 1233 at a constant value. In the case
of the optimal value of 2*Vpi, the monitor signal is kept constant at 97mV by the
control unit 1235, by varying the gain of the driver 1214. Identically, the control unit
1234 maintains the value of the output of the band pass filter 1232 constant by con
trolling the gain of the driver 1213. According to the present invention, the gain of the
drivers of the transmitter 1203 is controlled to the optimal conditions using a low
frequency dither signal, without causing any degradation to the quality of the emitted
signal.
[0067] FIG. 13 is a plot of the characteristics curves of the monitor signals generated by the
filters 1223 and 1233 of FIG. 12 and used by the transmitter 1201 of FIG 12 to control
the gain of the drivers of said transmitter.
[0068] The present invention enables to control an IQ modulator, emitting a lightwave
signal modulated according to QAM format, with a low frequency dither signal and to
avoid the degradation of signal quality caused by said dither signal. Moreover, the im
plementation of the present invention is possible with simple off the shelf electronics,
therefore it is cost effective. The present invention can be implemented with little
footprint, therefore it is small sized. Finally, the present invention enables to control
the gain of the driver amplifiers without causing additional damage.
Fourth Exemplary Embodiment
[0069] FIG. 14 is the schematic representation of the power DAC 1400. The power DAC
1400 has N+M inputs, where N and M are two integers, with N 3 2 and M3 0. The
power DAC 1400 transforms N+M binary electrical signals into a multilevel signal
with 2 (N+M) levels. The N first high speed binary signal inputs, noted by the con
secutive numerals starting from the input 1410 are attenuated by N respective at
tenuators noted by the consecutive numerals starting from the attenuator 1420. The
values of the attenuators may be different and are designed to obtain the desired
spacing between levels of the signal 1499. After said attenuators, the N respective
signals pass through N respective amplifiers circuits noted by the consecutive numerals
starting from the amplifier 1430. The amplifiers may be chosen as identical to the
amplifier circuit 600 of FIG. 6, the amplifier circuit700 of FIG. 7, or the amplifier
circuit800 of FIG. 8. The low frequency sine wave 1496 of frequency f is split into N
signals by the divider 1497, to be distributed to the N amplifier circuits noted by the
consecutive numerals from 1430. Said amplifiers amplify their respective inputs and
add a low frequency dither signal at the frequency f, which phase changes with the
level of the input high speed binary signal.
[0070] The following M inputs for high speed binary signals noted with consecutive
numerals from 1410+N also pass through M respective attenuators noted with con
secutive numerals from 1420+N. Said attenuators have proper attenuation values
chosen accordingly to the desired spacing between levels of the signal 1499. The r e
spective outputs of said attenuators are amplified by M respective amplifiers noted
with consecutive numerals from 1430+N. However, the M amplifiers do not imprint
low frequency dither signals. The power combiner 1498 combines the respective
outputs of the N amplifiers noted from 1430, which have a low frequency dither signal
imprinted, and the respective outputs of the M next amplifiers noted from 1430+N,
which do not have an imprinted low frequency dither signal. The signal 1499 output by
1498 is a 2 (N+M) level signal which has a low frequency dither signal component,
which amplitude depends on the level of the signal.
[0071] Considering the power DAC 1400 as a generalization of the power DAC 500, the
power DAC 500 is obtained by choosing N=2 and M=0 for 1400.
[0072] FIG. 15 is a schematic representation of an optical transponder implementing the
present invention. The transponder 1500 is provided with an optical transmitter 1501,
which emits a lightwave signal 1591 accordingly to the data bit stream 1590 provided
to the transponder. 1500 also features an optical receiver 1502, identical in structure to
the receiver 1202 of FIG. 12. The receiver 1502 receives the modulated lightwave
signal 1292 and demodulates it to provide the data bit stream 1593. The serializerdeserializer
1503 is identical to the serializer-deserializer 1203 of FIG. 12. The
transmitter 1501 is equipped with four power DAC 1505, 1506, 1507, 1508 identical to
the power DAC 1400 of FIG. 14. The power DAC transform (N+M) binary signals
into a 2 (N+M) level signal with a low frequency dither signal imprinted on it. The
coder 1504, generates 4*(N+M) data lanes, allocated to (N+M) bits coded the I and Q
data channels of each X and Y polarization of the transmitter 1501. The ABC circuits
1520 and 1521 are identical to the circuit 1220 of FIG. 12. The ABC circuits 1520 and
1521 provide a low frequency sine wave of frequency f to imprint a corresponding
dither signal on the multilevel signals generated by the power DAC 1505, 1506, 1507
and 1508. The multilevel electrical signals are amplified with the drivers 1511, 1512,
1513 and 1514. The modulator 1510 is identical to the modulator 1210 of FIG. 12. The
baud rate of the transponder 1500 is 32Gbaud.
[0073] First, the integers N and M defining the power DAC 1505, 1506, 1507 and 1508 are
chosen as N=2 and M=l. Attenuators in the power DAC are set as 2dB, 8 dB and OdB
with respect to the order of the inputs of FIG. 14. The signal emitted by the transmitter
1501 is 32Gbaud PM-64QAM, therefore with a bit rate of 512Gb/s. Accordingly, the
optical receiver 1502 receives and demodulates PM-64QAM signal. The ABC circuits
1520 and 1521 control the 6 DC biases of the modulator 1510. According to the
present invention, the DC biases are correctly set through a low frequency dither signal
imprinted on the high speed driving signal and the signal degradation caused by said
low frequency dither signal is reduced.
[0074] In a second implementation of the present invention, the integers N and M defining
the power DAC 1505, 1506, 1507 and 1508 are chosen as N=3 and M=0. Attenuators
in the power DAC are set as OdB, 2 dB and 8dB with respect to the order of the inputs
of FIG. 14. The signal emitted by the transmitter 1501 is 32Gbaud PM-64QAM,
therefore with a bit rate of 512Gb/s. Accordingly, the optical receiver 1502 receives
and demodulates PM-64QAM signal. The ABC circuits 1520 and 1521 control the 6
DC biases of the modulator 1510. According to the present invention, the DC biases
are correctly set through a low frequency dither signal imprinted on the high speed
driving signal and the signal degradation caused by said low frequency dither signal is
reduced.
[0075] FIG. 16 summarizes simulation results based on the transponder of FIG. 15. FIG.
16A displays the simulated waveform chart of output for the power DAC 1505 of FIG.
15 for the case where N=2 and M=l. The output signal is a 8-level signal generated
with the 3 binary signals generated by the coder 1504. The eight signal levels are
marked as 1600, 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1605, 1606 and 1607. As enabled by the
present invention, the amplitude of the imprinted low frequency dither signal depends
on the level. In this configuration, the levels 1601, 1603, 1604 and 1606 have no dither
signal present, while 1600, 1602, 1605 and 1607 have a low frequency dither signal.
[0076] FIG. 16B displays the simulated waveform chart of output for the power DAC 1505
of FIG. 15 for the case where N=3 and M=0. The output signal is a 8-level signal
generated with the 3 binary signals generated by the coder 1504. The eight signal
levels are marked as 1610, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1615, 1616 and 1617. As enabled
by the present invention, the amplitude of the imprinted low frequency dither signal
depends on the level. In this configuration, the outer levels 1610 and 1617 have
maximal amplitude for the low frequency dither signal whereas the inner levels 1611,
1612, 1613, 1614, 1615 and 1616 have reduced dither signal amplitudes.
[0077] FIG. 16C summarized the signal degradation for various types of transmitters
detailed by emitted symbol. The symbol index is fixed arbitrarily without any meaning
on the supposed data mapping operated by the transmitter. By pure convention, the
order is fixed in the same manner as for FIG. 3D, from left to right and bottom to up on
the constellation map of the emitted signal. The plotted value on FIG. 16C is the
difference between the EVM of the studied simulation and the EVM of the transmitter
set ideally and the dither signals and ABC circuits turned off. The conventional
convention corresponds to the dither signal imprinted directly on the DC biases, in the
manner of FIG. 1. The case N=2 / M=l corresponds to the configuration plot on FIG.
16A. The case N=3 / M=0 corresponds to the configuration plot on FIG. 16B. The con
ventional case illustrates the fact that on central symbols, dithers used for ABC control
cause important degradation on the emitted signals. In the case of the present invention
with N=3 and M=0, the degradation is kept below 20% for all symbols, which is an
improvement from the conventional method. In the case of the present invention with
N=2 and M=l, the degradation is kept below 8% for all symbols, which is an im
provement from the conventional method.
[0078] The present invention enables to control an IQ modulator, emitting a lightwave
signal modulated according to QAM format, with a low frequency dither signal and to
avoid the degradation of signal quality caused by said dither signal. Moreover, the implementation
of the present invention is possible with simple off the shelf electronics,
therefore it is cost effective. The present invention can be implemented with little
footprint, therefore it is small sized.
[0079] It is apparent that the present invention is not limited to the above described em
bodiments, which can be modified and changed without departing from the scope of
the invention.
Industrial Applicability
[0080] This invention can be applied to an optical communication system which utilizes
multi-level modulation schemes.
Reference Signs List
[0081] 100, 400, 1000, 1201, 1501 optical transmitters
104, 105, 220, 230, 404, 405, 520, 530, 610, 1004, 1005, 1211, 1212, 1213, 1214,
1430, 1511, 1512, 1513, 1514 electrical amplifiers
110, 410, 1010, 1210, 1510 IQ modulator
120, 420, 1020 ABC circuit
140, 440, 1060 Control units
198, 498, 1098, 1290, 1293 binary data streams
199, 499, 1099, 1291, 1292, 1591, 1592 Modulated lightwave signals
200, 500, 1400 Power DAC
201, 202, 501, 502, 601, 603, 701, 703, 801, 802, 804, 805, 1410 Binary electrical
signals
203, 503, 1499 Multilevel electrical signal
240 Power divider
241, 242, 243 Resistors
301, 302, 303, 304, 305 Point on the curve of transmission characteristics
310 to 325 Symbols on the constellation map of 16QAM signals
330, 331, 332, 333, 900, 901, 902, 903, 910, 911, 912, 913, 1600, 1601, 1602, 1603,
1604, 1605, 1606, 1607, 1610, 1611, 1612, 1613, 1614, 1615, 1616, 1617 levels of
electrical signals
504, 602, 702, 803, 1496 low frequency electrical sine signal
600, 700, 800 Amplifier circuits
609, 708, 709, 809 Fixed voltages
710, 7 11 Field Effect Transistors
810, 811 Transistors
620, 621, 622 Condensers
730, 731, 830, 831 Resistors
920, 921, 1301, 1302 Characteristic curve of monitor signal
1202, 1502 optical receiver
1200. 1500 optical transponder
WO 2013/042284 PCT/JP2012/001476
Claims
[Claim 1] An optical output device comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals
and adding a dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower than the bit
rate of said binary electrical signals, on said two or more binary
electrical signals,
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical
signals;
a modulating unit of modulating an optical signal by using said two or
more binary electrical signals.
[Claim 2] The optical output device according to claim 1, further comprising;
a generator generating the dither electrical signal.
[Claim 3] The optical output device according to claim 1, further comprising;
a monitor generating a electric signal proportional to said optical signal,
and
a band pass filter inputted said electric signal and outputting said the
dither electrical signal.
[Claim 4] An optical module comprising:
an optical input device generating a electric signal from an inputted
optical signal, and
an optical output device generating a outputted optical signal,
said optical output device further comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals
and adding a dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower than the bit
rate of said binary electrical signals, on said two or more binary
electrical signals,
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical
signals;
a modulating unit of modulating said outputted optical signal by using
said two or more binary electrical signals.
[Claim 5] A device generating a multilevel electrical signal, comprising:
a combining unit of combining two or more binary electrical signals;
an adjusting unit of adjusting the amplitude of said binary electrical
signals;
an adding unit of adding a dither electrical signal of frequency f, lower
than the bit rate of said binary electrical signals, on said two or more
binary electrical signals, wherein
WO 2013/042284 PCT/JP2012/001476
the phase of said dither electrical signal depends on the value of said
binary signal to which it is added;
the phase of said dither electrical signal is susceptible to change for
each bit of said binary signal.
[Claim 6] A method for controlling an optical transmitter, comprising:
generating a multilevel electrical signal by means of combining two or
more binary electrical signals, where said multilevel electrical signal is
used to drive a modulator of said transmitter, and adding a dither signal
of frequency f, lower than the bit rate of said binary electrical signals,
on two or more of said binary electrical signals,
modulating a optical signal by using said two or more binary electrical
signals.
[Claim 7] The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to claim
6, wherein
the phase of said dither electrical signal depends on the value of said
binary signal to which it is added,
the phase of said dither electrical signal is susceptible to change for
each bit of said binary signal, and
controlling said transmitter according to the component of frequency f
of said optical signal.
[Claim 8] The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to claim
7, wherein a bias of said modulator is controlled according to said
frequency component of said optical signal.
[Claim 9] The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to any
one of claims 6 to 8, wherein the output voltage of a driver amplifier
used for said multilevel electrical signal is controlled according to said
frequency component of said monitor signal.
[Claim 10] The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to any
one of claims 6 to 9, wherein
said optical transmitter has a plurality of modulator, each of said
modulator generates said optical signal,
different frequencies of said dither signals are used per said modulators.
[Claim 11] The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to any
one of claims 6 to claim 9, wherein
said optical transmitter has a plurality of modulator, each of said
modulator generates said optical signal,
a common frequency of said dither signals is used for said plurality of
modulator.
PCT/JP2012/001476
The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to any
one of claims 6 to claim 11, wherein the resulting dither signal on the
multilevel electrical signal is null on some of the levels of said
multilevel electrical signal.
The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to any
one of claims 6 to claim 12, wherein said transmitter is modulated
according to polarization multiplexed QAM format.
The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to claim
13, wherein
said transmitter is modulated according to polarization multiplexed
64QAM format,
said multilevel electrical signal has eight levels and is generated by
combination of three binary electrical levels,
DC biases of Mach-Zehnder modulators nested within a IQ modulator
are controlled according to said optical signal, and
the quadrature angle between said Mach-Zehnder modulators is
controlled according to said optical signal.
The method for controlling said optical transmitter according to claim
13, wherein
said transmitter is modulated according to polarization multiplexed
16QAM format,
said multilevel electrical signal has four levels and is generated by
combination of two binary electrical levels,
DC biases of Mach-Zehnder modulators nested within a IQ modulator
are controlled according to said optical signal, and
the quadrature angle between said Mach-Zehnder modulators is
controlled according to said optical signal.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2115-DELNP-2014.pdf 2014-03-27
2 NEC Corporation.pdf 2014-04-02
3 IB304.pdf 2014-04-02
4 FORM-5.pdf 2014-04-02
5 FORM-3.pdf 2014-04-02
6 11039-47-SPECIFICATION.pdf 2014-04-02
7 2115-delnp-2014-Correspondence-Others-(31-07-2014).pdf 2014-07-31
8 2115-delnp-2014-Form-3-(16-09-2014).pdf 2014-09-16
9 2115-delnp-2014-Correspondence-Others-(16-09-2014).pdf 2014-09-16
10 Form 3 [21-03-2017(online)].pdf 2017-03-21
11 2115-DELNP-2014-FER.pdf 2018-05-25
12 2115-DELNP-2014-AbandonedLetter.pdf 2019-11-05

Search Strategy

1 2115delnp2014_23-04-2018.pdf