Sign In to Follow Application
View All Documents & Correspondence

Text Implication Assessment Device Text Implication Assessment Method And Computer Readable Recording Medium

Abstract: This text implication assessment device (2) is provided with: a vector generation unit (21) which with regard to each of a first and a second text for each predicate argument structure generates a vector using words other than words that indicate the type of a parameter of the predicate in the predicate argument structure; a combination identification unit (22) which compares the vectors generated for each predicate argument structure with regard to the first text and the vectors generated for each predicate argument structure with regard to the second text and on the basis of the results of the comparisons identifies combinations of a predicate argument structure of the first text and a predicate argument structure of the second text; and an implication assessment unit (23) which for each of the combinations obtains a feature value and on the basis of the feature value assesses whether the first text implies the second text.

Get Free WhatsApp Updates!
Notices, Deadlines & Correspondence

Patent Information

Application #
Filing Date
16 April 2014
Publication Number
36/2016
Publication Type
INA
Invention Field
COMPUTER SCIENCE
Status
Email
patent@depenning.com
Parent Application
Patent Number
Legal Status
Grant Date
2023-09-14
Renewal Date

Applicants

NEC CORPORATION
7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8001

Inventors

1. TSUCHIDAMasaaki
NEC Corporation, 7-1, Shiba 5-chome, Minatoku, Tokyo 108-8001
2. ISHIKAWAKai
c/o NEC Corporation 7 1 Shiba 5 chome Minato ku Tokyo 1088001
3. ONISHITakashi
c/o NEC Corporation 7 1 Shiba 5 chome Minato ku Tokyo 1088001

Specification

1. A textual entailment recognition apparatus (2) for determining whether a
first text entails a second text, comprising:
a vector generation unit (21) configured to acquire a predicate-argument structure that includes a predicate included in the first text or the second text, a word serving as an argument of the predicate, and a word indicating the type of argument, from each of the first text and the second text, and
generate, for each of the first text and the second text, by using the predicate included in the predicate argument structure and the word serving as an argument of the predicate, a vector whose dimension is the value obtained by subtracting the number of common character strings from a total value of character strings included in each predicate argument structure,
set a character string corresponding to each dimension in generating each of the vectors,
set a component in which the character string exists to 1 and a component in which the character string does not exist to 0;
a combination identification unit (22) configured to calculate the similarity between the vector generated for each predicate-argument structure for the first text and the vector generated for each predicate-argument structure for the second text, and identifies combinations of the predicate-argument structures of the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text based on the similarity; and
an entailment determination unit (23) configured to obtain for each of the combinations, one of a degree of word coverage and a degree of word matching for only the word serving as the argument between the predicate-argument structure of the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text, as a feature amount, based on a word other than a word indicating the type of argument of a predicate in the predicate-argument structure, and
determine whether the first text entails the second text based on the obtained feature amounts.
2. The textual entailment recognition apparatus as claimed in claim 1,

wherein the combination identification unit (22) performs normalization processing during calculation of the similarity, in accordance with an amount of information of the vector.
3. The textual entailment recognition apparatus as claimed in claim 1,
wherein the entailment determination unit (23) uses, in addition to the
feature amount, a structural feature of the predicate-argument structure to determine whether the first text entails the second text.
4. The textual entailment recognition apparatus as claimed in claim 3,
wherein the entailment determination unit (23) performs determination with
preference to one of the feature amount and the structural feature of the predicate-argument structure, in accordance with a structural similarity between the predicate-argument structure of the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text.
5. The textual entailment recognition apparatus as claimed in claim 1,
wherein the entailment determination unit (23) adds a weight to the feature
amount based on data obtained through machine learning, when obtaining the feature amount.
6. A textual entailment recognition method for determining whether a first text
entails a second text by an electronic device, comprising the steps of:
(a) acquiring a predicate-argument structure that includes a predicate included in the first text or the second text, a word serving as an argument of the predicate, and a word indicating the type of argument, from each of the first text and the second text,
generating, for each of the first text and the second text, by using the predicate included in the predicate argument structure and the word serving as an argument of the predicate, a vector whose dimension is the value obtained by subtracting the number of common character strings from a total value of character strings included in each predicate argument structure,

setting a character string corresponding to each dimension in generating each of the vectors,
setting a component in which the character string exists to 1 and a component in which the character string does not exist to 0;
(b) calculating the similarity between the vector generated for each predicate-argument structure for the first text and the vector generated for each predicate-argument structure for the second text, and identifying combinations of the predicate-argument structures of the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text based on the similarity; and
(c) obtaining for each of the combinations, one of a degree of word coverage and a degree of word matching for only the word serving as the argument between the predicate-argument structure of the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text, as a feature amount, based on a word other than a word indicating the type of argument of a predicate in the predicate-argument structure, and
determining whether the first text entails the second text based on the obtained feature amounts.
7. The textual entailment recognition method as claimed in claim 6,
wherein, in the step (b), normalization processing is performed during
calculation of the similarity in accordance with an amount of information of the vector.
8. The textual entailment recognition method as claimed in claim 6,
wherein, in the step (c), in addition to the feature amount, a structural feature
of the predicate-argument structure is used to determine whether the first text entails the second text.
9. The textual entailment recognition method as claimed in claim 8,
wherein, in the step (c), determination is performed with preference to one of the feature amount and the structural feature of the predicate-argument structure, in accordance with a structural similarity between the predicate-argument structure of

the first text and the predicate-argument structure of the second text.
10. The textual entailment recognition method as claimed in claim 7,
wherein, in the step (c), a weight is added to the feature amount based on data obtained through machine learning, when obtaining the feature amount.

Documents

Application Documents

# Name Date
1 2892-CHENP-2014.pdf 2014-04-17
2 Form 5.pdf 2014-04-21
3 1368-2014 OTHERS.pdf 2014-04-21
4 2892-CHENP-2014 FORM-13. 21-05-2014.pdf 2014-05-21
5 2892-CHENP-2014 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 21-05-2014.pdf 2014-05-21
6 2892-CHENP-2014 AMENDED CLAIMS 21-05-2014.pdf 2014-05-21
7 2892-CHENP-2014 FORM-3 14-10-2014.pdf 2014-10-14
8 2892-CHENP-2014 FORM-1 14-10-2014.pdf 2014-10-14
9 2892-CHENP-2014 CORRESPONDENCE OTHERS 14-10-2014.pdf 2014-10-14
10 2892-CHENP-2014-Form-13-210514.pdf 2016-11-08
11 Form 3 [20-12-2016(online)].pdf 2016-12-20
12 2892-CHENP-2014-FER.pdf 2019-07-12
13 2892-CHENP-2014-Verified English translation (MANDATORY) [23-10-2019(online)].pdf 2019-10-23
14 2892-CHENP-2014-OTHERS [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
15 2892-CHENP-2014-Information under section 8(2) (MANDATORY) [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
16 2892-CHENP-2014-FORM-26 [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
17 2892-CHENP-2014-FER_SER_REPLY [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
18 2892-CHENP-2014-DRAWING [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
19 2892-CHENP-2014-COMPLETE SPECIFICATION [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
20 2892-CHENP-2014-CLAIMS [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
21 2892-CHENP-2014-ABSTRACT [09-01-2020(online)].pdf 2020-01-09
22 2892-CHENP-2014-Form26_General Power of Attorney_13-01-2020.pdf 2020-01-13
23 2892-CHENP-2014-Correspondence_13-01-2020.pdf 2020-01-13
24 2892-CHENP-2014-abstract.jpg 2020-01-21
25 2892-CHENP-2014-PatentCertificate14-09-2023.pdf 2023-09-14
26 2892-CHENP-2014-IntimationOfGrant14-09-2023.pdf 2023-09-14

Search Strategy

1 2892chenp2014searchstrategy_12-07-2019.pdf

ERegister / Renewals