Laxmi Mills Estate, Shakti Mills Lane, Off. Dr. E. Moses Road, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai 400 011.
Type
Word
State
Maharashtra
Country
Filing Mode
Branch Office
IP Office
MUMBAI
Used Since
07 December 1998
Valid / Upto
11 December 2018
Description
[Class : 1] Chemical Products For Industrial Purposes, Chemical Products For Printing, Photographic Plates, Aluminum Photosensitive Plates, Colour Photographic Plates, Ferrotype Photographic Plates, Chemical Compositions For Absorbing Moisture, Chemical Preparations For Photography, Compounds Of Chemical Products For Distributing, Printing Inks, Photographic Developing Preparations And Substances, Gallate Developer, Gums And Adhesives For Industrial Use Or Manufacturing Process, Scum Removers, Acid Proof Sensitizers Used In Photography Sensitized Paper, Films And Cloth Preservatives Included In Class 1, Chemicals For Positive Working Acid Development Deep Etch Platemaking, Chemicals For Negative Working Wipe On Platemaking Chemicals For Positive Working Water Development Deep Etch Platemaking Pressroom Chemicals Fountain Solutions, Washes Used In Printing Industry, Pre Sensitized Chemicals Included In Class 1.
PR Details
Registration Renewed For A Period Of 10 Years From 11 Th December, 2008 Advertised In Journal No. 1404
Sign In to Follow Application All Documents & Correspondence
Uploaded Documents
1
Additional Representation Sheet
12 Jun 1994
2
TM-1
11 Dec 1998
Correspondence and Notices
1
O3 NOTICE
6968768
3193326
11 Sep 2018
Frequently Asked Questions
Date on which the trademark application was filed with TMO?
Pop-pop was applied on 11 December 1998.
Who is the trademark proprietor?
Trademark application was filed by TECHNOVA IMAGING SYSTEMS.
Trademark application is filed under which trademark class?
Trademark application has been filed under classes 1.
Trademark application is at what stage of trademark process?
As per IP India, trademark application status is Registered.
What is the Listed Application ID of the Trademark?
Listed application Id of Pop-pop is 831960.
Who filed the trademark on behalf of the proprietor?