When an application for trademark registration is opposed under Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Applicant must file a Counter-Statement to defend their rights and keep the application alive.
The trademark opposition mechanism under Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is one of the most potent tools available to brand owners to safeguard their marks from misuse, dilution, or confusion.
That’s where Section 11(6–10) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 comes in—it’s like their playbook for deciding if your brand’s a superstar. 1: Showing Off Your Brand’s Fame The Registrar’s like, “Alright, prove your brand’s a rockstar.”
That’s where Section 11(6–10) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 comes in—it’s like their playbook for deciding if your brand’s a superstar. 1: Showing Off Your Brand’s Fame The Registrar’s like, “Alright, prove your brand’s a rockstar.”
That’s where Section 11(6–10) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 comes in—it’s like their playbook for deciding if your brand’s a superstar. 1: Showing Off Your Brand’s Fame The Registrar’s like, “Alright, prove your brand’s a rockstar.”
Condonation of Delay & Extension of Time The Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Trade Marks Rules, 2017 provide limited situations where time can be extended: General Rule (Rule 109): Registrar may extend time for filing a counter-statement by up to 1 month on request.
Trademark opposition is a legal remedy available under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 that allows any aggrieved party to stop the registration of a trademark.
The Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides mechanisms to cancel, vary, or rectify entries in the Register of Trade Marks if they are wrongly made or wrongly remaining on the register.